Final Year Project 2017/2018 - Universiti Malaysia...

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING

Final Year Project

2017/2018

INTRODUCTION TO FYP AND LOGBOOK GUIDELINE

By Madam Maisara Azad Bt Mat Akhir

FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2017/2018

• Introduction

• Problem Statement

• Objective

• Literature review

• Methodology

• Introduction

• Problem Statement

• Objective

• Literature review

• Methodology

FYP 1-ERT445

2 Credits

Proposal Report &

Proposal Defense

FYP 1-ERT445

2 Credits

Proposal Report &

Proposal Defense

Introduction

Problem Statement

Objective

Literature review

Methodology

Data Collection & Data Analysis

Results & Discussion

Conclusion

Introduction

Problem Statement

Objective

Literature review

Methodology

Data Collection & Data Analysis

Results & Discussion

Conclusion

FYP 2- ERT446

4 Credits

Final Thesis & Viva Voce

FYP 2- ERT446

4 Credits

Final Thesis & Viva Voce

SEM 1 SEM 2

What is FYP?

FYP is a structured research activity relevant to the School ofBioprocess Engineering’s area of specialization and it isCOMPULSORY for final year students to undertake andcomplete a project as part of the requirement for theconferment of the bachelor’s degree in engineering

The Final Year Project (FYP) consists of an individual piece of work of 15,000-20,000 words in length, on a subject of

the student’s own choosing.

AIM

• The main aim of the FYP is to expose and to enhancestudent’s knowledge and competency in solving a problemthrough academic research in order to produce competentengineers/ technologists in the 21st century in line withUniMAP’s Mission and Vision.

OBJECTIVES

• After completing the FYP, students are required to show theability to:

• modulate and utilize academic knowledge and practicalexperience in conducting an academic project

• think objectively, analytically and critically in identifying andsolving problems in a systematic manner

• work independently in conducting and completing anacademic project

• present the final results orally and graphically

COURSE OUTLINE OF FYP

• Ability to conduct literature review to justify the importance of research and to support development of coherent methodology using standard references including journals, policies, field data, etc,

CO 1

• Ability to analyze scenario and compose the problem statements and the research objectives of the project.CO 2

• Ability to formulate research methodology incorporating clear fundamentals, theories and benchmarked against standard practices governing the research project.

CO 3

• Ability to communicate through clear research writing conform to standard thesis format and performs verbal presentationCO 4

MARKS DISTRIBUTION

No Evaluator Component % Total %

1 Supervisor Problem statement & Research

objective report

10

40Literature review report 15

Methodology report 15

2 Internal

examiner

Proposal report 3050

Proposal presentation 20

3 Coordinator Log book 10 10

TOTAL 100 100

FYP DISTRIBUTION

Supervisor (Lecturer)

1. Prof. Ir. Dr. Ibni Hajar Bin Hj Rukunudin (019-282 9878)2. Prof. Ir. Dr. Ayob Katimon (017-728 6742)3. Prof. Madya Dr. Mahamad Nor B. Jaafar (019-410 2024)4. Dr. Sam Sung Ting (012-683 8636)5. Dr. Muhamad Firdaus Abdul Muttalib (019-457 0349)6. En. Hirun Azaman Bin Ismail (0124700157)7. Pn. Samera Bt. Samsuddin Sah (016-414 4537)8. Pn. Fathin Ayuni Azizan (019-305 1788)9. En. Mohd Khairul Rabani Hashim (013-318 9760)10.Pn. Aimi Athirah Aznan (013-536 2813)11.En. Muhammad Nur Aiman Uda (019-471 8844)12.Pn. Maisara Azad Bt Mat Akhir (0148405247 – Office

hour only unless for urgent matters)13.En. Firdaus Ibrahim (013-461 9461)14.Dr. Nor Hidawati Binti Haji Elias (011-3416 7393)15.En. Zainal Abidin Arsat (019-603 3415)16.Pn Nur Hadijah Bt Zainal Abidin (016-507 8254)

Student – Supervisor Distribution

Student must be supervised by a lecturer or fellow

from Biosystems lecturers as main supervisor.

Student can be co-supervised by a lecturer or fellow

from Biosystems and Bioprocess lecturers.

The distribution will be based on: student interest,

CGPA and lecturer availability.

Student can propose a project title or choose an

interest project title provided by supervisors. Own

project title is allowed after the proposal was

accepted and student assigned to a supervisor.

Project title will distributed by FYP coordinator after

FYP committee meeting.

Student – Supervisor Distribution

The main supervisor is determined by FYP

meeting.

Co-supervisor is determined by student or main

supervisor.

Students should meet with supervisor starting

from today to discuss your project.

FYP DISTRIBUTION

The main supervisor will be same for FYP1 and

FYP2.

Students may change their title with approval

from the main supervisor at latest before 15th

September 2017.

The changing of supervisor are not allowed

unless have a concrete reason.

REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT

Students must have completed at least 90 credits of other

courses.

FYP 1 (ERT445) and FYP 2 (ERT446) registration must be done

in 2 consecutive semesters.

No “rest” semester is allowed.

PASS REQUIREMENT

Students must meet with supervisor minimum 8 times in one

semester (Will be assess through rubric and minutes of meeting)

Student should follow the regulation for implementation and

grading scheme of FYP.

Students need to have grade C (mark=50) to pass the FYP.

11

FYP 1 Typical Activities (10 hours / week)

• Problem formulation

• Project planning

• Literature study

• Equipment study

• Software study

• Data gathering

• Project planning optimization

12

FYP Implementation

• System setup

• Hardware Design

• Programming

• Preliminary testing

• Analysis

• Seminar

• Thesis 1 writing

(Final proposal)

FYP 2 Typical Activities (20 hours/week)

• Hardware realization

• Software realization

• Testing

• Analysis

• Optimization

• Seminar

• Demo

• Thesis writing

• Paper writing

13

IMPORTANT DATESDESCRIPTION DATE REMARK

Submission of Changing of FYP Title Form Due date: 15 September 2017

Submission of Chapter 1 & 2 (Problem statement,

research objective, literature review)

*Attach together with references.

Due date: 25 September 2017 1 copy

Submission of Chapter 3 (Research methodology) report

*Attach together with references. Due date: 6 October 2017 1 copy

Submission of full proposal report 23 October 2017 2 copies

Proposal Defence 30 October - 3 November 2017

Reviva 15 or 16 November 2017

Submission of corrected final full proposal report based on panel’s

comments to the coordinator to be reviewed.

13 November 2017 (Pass)

20 November 2017 (Reviva)1 copy

FYP Class

Students are compulsory to attend library visit and the first four class:

1st week: Introduction to FYP and how to write Introduction section (Chapter 1)

2nd week: Library visit (No class)

3rd week: Writing a literature review (Chapter 2)

4th week: How to construct methodology section (Chapter 3) and Introduction to Design of Experiment (DOE).

5th week: Proposal format and presentation skill for proposal defence.

FYP PROPOSAL

WHAT IS PROPOSAL?

At the required date, students must submit their Project

Proposal which consists of : the proposed project title, executive

summary, background of study, problem statement, objective,

scope for FYP1 and FYP2, literature review, methodology

(Experimental design, requirement of equipment, tool, software,

data), expected output, references, gantt chart and milestone

The project proposal must be typed using the APA format of

citation. Project draft report (Chapter 1 & 2 and Chapter 3) and

draft proposal must be submitted to Coordinator according to the

dateline given.

After proposal defence, students need to do correction based

on panel’s comments and suggestions and submit to coordinator.

Then, students are allowed to start their experimental lab work.

Must have:1. Title page 2. Executive summary – max of 1 page3. Table of content4. List of Figure5. List of Table6. List of symbol, nomenclatures7. Chapter 1: Background of study – 2-3 pages8. Chapter 1: Problem statement – max of 1 page9. Chapter 1: Objective (At least 3 objectives, max of 4 objective),

Research Questions and Scope of Study – 1-2 page10. Chapter 2: Literature review – 8-10 pages11. Methodology – 3- 5 pages12. Gantt chart – 1 page13. Milestones – 1 page14. Expected result – max 1 page15. Reference - min of 10 latest ref within 5 years (2012-2017)

PROPOSAL WRITING GUIDELINE

Times New Roman

12

1.5 Spacing

Maximum 25 pages

20

Submit

23/10/17 – before 5.00 PM

2 copies

TAPE binding

PROPOSAL WRITING GUIDELINE

D:/UniMAP Teaching Stuffs/SEM I 1718/ERT445/Full-Proposal Format.docx

D:/UniMAP Teaching Stuffs/SEM I 1718/ERT445/Full-Proposal Format.docx

Proposal Defence

Proposal Defence

In the Proposal Defence, students are required to present their

FYP background of study, problem statement, objectives,

project scope, literature review, methodology, expected result,

gantt chart and milestones to a panel of evaluators.

The panel members will test the students on matters related to

the project. In the Proposal defence session, students need to

give an overall view of the FYP and the proposed method to

achieved the objectives.

Outcome: Pass/ proceed with the experiment procedure or

reviva/ re-proposal defence.

Students are required to attend re-viva session if the panel decide to do so.

Among the relevant things to include in the

presentation are:

Background of study, problem statement,

objective and scope

Literature review

Methodology and experimental design

Expected result analysis

Project plan

Proposal Defence

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE

STUDENT

1. To agree on a schedule of meetings with the supervisor and to attend such meetings.

2. To take the initiative in raising problems.

3. To maintain the progress of the work in accordance with the milestones and objectives agreed with the supervisor.

4. To contribute to plan the project and monitoring progress against the plan.


STUDENT

5. To keep a project log for recording results,ideas, references etc. acquired as the projectprogresses.

6. To determine the contents of the report andof oral presentations.

7. To present draft chapters to the supervisorbefore the semester end.


SUPERVISOR

1. To give guidance about the nature of the projectand the standard expected, the planning of theproject, literature and sources, techniques andmethods and about any problems of plagiarism.

2. To maintain contact via regular supervisionmeetings.

3. To be accessible within reason at other times forgiving advice to the student.

4. To give detailed advice on milestones.


SUPERVISOR

5. To request written work as appropriate andreturn such work with constructive criticismwithin a reasonable time.

6. To ensure that a student is made aware of anyinadequacy of progress, or of standards of workbelow those expected.

7. To encourage the student to produce early draftchapters, to comment on them critically andreturn the comments promptly. If the studentdoes not do so, this is the student's responsibility.

THINGS TO DO FROM NOW

• Understand the objectives of your project.

• Prepare a Gantt chart.

• Prepare an outline of the content of your thesis.

• Get the materials i.e. books or relevant literatures as much as possible from now.

• Keep in touch & clear doubts with your supervisors.

• Read journals everyday and summaries it.

• Keep Log Book - Keep all your works (research, design, experimental result, … etc) Bring along to meet supervisor.

SCHOOL OF BIOPROSES ENGINEERING

FINAL YEAR PROJECT LOGBOOK

ERT

445/446

School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis

Ilmu, Keikhlasan, Kecermelangan

NAME :_________________________________________

MATRIC NO. :_________________________________________

PROGRAMME :_________________________________________

SESSION :_________________________________________

PROJECT TITLE :_________________________________________

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

FYP LOG BOOK

• The FYP log book is a combination of generalguidelines for the FYP and also a journal torecord all FYP activities throughout the twosemesters.

• This book is an important mechanism for theCoordinator/Supervisor to evaluate astudent's attitude and ability and also tomonitor the status of the student's projectthroughout the semester.

• Students are required to write clearly and honestly allactivities performed and then to summarize their workevery week.

• This is essential since part of the final marks receivedby the students on their FYP will be based on whatthey have recorded in this log book.

• Every meeting with supervisor need to have aminutes of meeting and date of the minutes meetingmust be tally with “report on meeting date betweenstudent and supervisor” (Page 6-8, log book)

• Students are highly encouraged to maintain aseparate file/folder to compile all theirfindings/printouts/datasheets as a complement to thislog book.

A REMINDER TO STUDENTSA REMINDER TO STUDENTS

Log book must be presented to your supervisor to be revised at least

EVERY TWO WEEK.

..\..\lOGBOOK\FYP UniMAP Logbook .pdf

../../lOGBOOK/FYP UniMAP Logbook .pdf

FYP ASSESSMENT

mETHODS:

RUBRICS

CO PO Rubric Marks

CO1 – Ability to conduct literature review to justify

the importance of research and to support

development of coherent methodology using

standard references including journals, policies,

field data, etc,

PO4 Rubric 1

Literature Review15% (Supervisor)

CO2 – Ability to analyze scenario and compose the

problem statements and the research objectives of

the project.

PO2 Rubric 2

Problem Statements and

Research Objectives

10% (Supervisor)

CO3 – Ability to formulate research methodology

incorporating clear fundamentals, theories and

benchmarked against standard practices governing

the research project.

PO1 Rubric 3

Methodology

15% (Supervisor)

CO4 – Ability to communicate through clear

research writing conform to standard thesis

format and performs verbal presentation

PO10 Rubric 4

Log Book

Rubric 5

Written Proposal

Rubric 6

Proposal Defense

10% (Coordinator)

30% (Examiner)

20% (Examiner)

Total = 100%

ERT 445/2 FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1EVALUATION

Name of Student : Matric No:

Project Title:

Name of Supervisor:

NO CRITERIAEXEMPLARY PROFICIENT ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

SCORE10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

1 Review of previous

findings

Excellent comparison and

analysis of previous research

results related to research

topic

Good comparison and

analysis of previous

research results related to

research topic

Fair comparison and analysis

of previous research results

related to research topic

Poor or no comparison

and analysis of previous

research results related

to research topic

2 Structure of the review The structure is extremely

organized, demonstrates

logical sequencing and

structure. Transitions tie

sections together, as well as

adjacent paragraphs.

Good organization of

structure, demonstrates

logical sequencing and

structure. All sections or

paragraphs follow in a

natural or logical order.

Fair organization of structure

and flow, but not all sections

or paragraphs follow in a

natural or logical order.

Poor or no organization,

with no logical sequence.

3 Methodology review Demonstrate thorough review

on various experimental

methods used from previous

studies and make strong

recommendation on the

appropriate methodology to

be adopted.

Demonstrate good review


methods used from

previous studies and make


appropriate methodology

to be adopted.

Demonstrate shallow review


methods used from previous

studies and make


appropriate methodology to

be adopted.

Limited review on

experimental methods

use from previous

studies and no

recommendation on

method to be adopted

4 Credible reference

(Eg: Journal, conference

paper, book, thesis etc.)

Minimum of 80% citations are

from credible references.

Minimum of 60% citations

are from credible

references.

Minimum of 40% citations are

from credible references.

Minimum of 20%

citations are from

credible references.

5 Sources used More than 10 latest published

articles (within past 5 years).

At least 10 latest published

articles (within past 5

years).

Less than 5 articles (within

past 5 years).

Less than 3 articles

(within past 5 years).

6 Critical review

(Summary of the literature

review)

Demonstrate strong concluding

remarks either on the respective

subject matters reviewed or

provide an overall summary.

Demonstrate good concluding

remarks either on a few

subject matters reviewed or

provide an overall summary.

Demonstrate fair concluding

remarks either on a few subject

matters reviewed or provide an

overall summary.

Lack of concluding remarks

either on a few subject

matters reviewed or

provide inadequate overall

summary.

TOTAL SCORE /60

TOTAL MARKS = 60× 15% =

PROPOSAL PROGRESS RUBRICRUBRIC 1

PO4 - Ability to Conduct Investigation (To be Evaluated from Literature Review)


Project Title:

Name of Supervisor:


SCORE10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

1 Concise description

of research

background

Provides thorough, relevant,

clear and concise description

of research issues with

excellent variety of sources

used. The information is

articulated in a smooth and

logical manner.

Provides a good background

to the research issues using

considerable number of

sources. The information flow

is sufficient.

Provides a fair background to the

research issues using considerable

number of sources. The

information flow is acceptable.

Demonstrate incoherent description of research issues. Poorly written and the information flow is haphazard.

2 Specific statement

of problems

Clarity in the statement of

problem with clear focus on

research issue.

Demonstrate good statement

of problem based on the

specific research issue.

Demonstrate fair statement of

problem based on the vaguely

identified research issue.

Lack of focus in the statment of

problem and not connected to

research issue.

X2

3 Clarity of research

questions

Provide at least 3 strong and

clear statement of research

questions.

Provide 3 good statement of

research questions.

Provide 3 fair statement of

research questions.

Most of the 3 statement of

research questions are not clearly

stated.

4 Clarity of objectives

statement

Provide at least 3 strong and

clear statement of research

objectives with higher

taxonomy level (C5/C6 level).

Provide 3 good statement of

research objectives with

higher taxonomy level (C5/C6

level).

Provide 3 fair statement of

research objectives comprising of

high/low taxonomy levels

Most of the 3 statement of

research objectives are not clearly

stated and do not meet high

taxonomy level (C5/C6 level).

5 Clarity of scope of

study.

Clarity in the statement of the

scope of study with clear focus

on research work.

Demonstrate good

statement of the scope of

study with clear focus.

Demonstrate fair statement of the

scope of study with vague focus.

Lack of focus in the statment of

the scope of study.

TOTAL SCORE /60



PO2 - Ability to Identify and Formulate Problem (To be Evaluated from Problem Statements and Research Objectives)


Project Title:

Name of Supervisor:


SCORE10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

1 Clarity in the research

process

Excellent research

procedures flow chart

Excellent description and

flow of research procedures

Good research procedures

flow chart

Good description and flow

of research procedures

Fair research procedures

flow chart

Moderate description and

flow of research procedures

Poor research procedures

flow chart

Poor description and flow

of research procedures

__ x1 =

2 Rational Research

Techniques Meeting

Research Objectives.

Concrete experimental

procedures fully meet the

research objectives.

Sufficient experimental

procedures meeting the


Fair experimental

procedures partly meet the


Insubstantial experimental

procedures and mostly not

meeting the research

objectives.

__ x1 =

3 Understanding of Research

Procedures

(e.g.: theories, equations and

calculations ).

In-depth understanding of

scientific / fundamental

knowledge in research

method

Sufficient understanding of



method

Moderate understanding of



method

Poor understanding of



method

__ x1 =

4 Use of analytical tools and

materials

Clear description of tools

(eg: brand, model no,

location) and laboratory

supplies chosed including

the used of experimental

design

Sufficient description of

tools (eg: brand, model no,



brief explanation on the

experimental design

Moderate description of

tools (eg: brand, model no,



fair explanation on the

experimental design

Poor description of tools

(eg: brand, model no,


supplies chosed and failed

to highlight the

experimental design

__ x1 =

5 Use of statistical techniques

in data analysis.

Sub-section at the end of

Methodology Chapter

(Modelling, DOE, statistical

software)

Excellent identification of

statistical techniques used

in data analysis to generate

valid and reliable data.

Good identification of




Adequate identification of




Poor identification of




__ x2 =

TOTAL SCORE /60



PO1 - Ability to Apply Knowledge of Mathematic, Science and Engineering (To be Evaluated from Methodology)


Project Title:

Name of Supervisor:


SCORE10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

1 Information Logbook is exceptionally details,providing an in depth look intothe project, providing properdiagrams and clear description

Logbook is well details,providing an in depth lookinto the project, providingproper diagrams but no cleardescription

An appropriate amount of detailis used to explain the activitieslogged/ observed, somediagrams and fair description

Details is missing or insufficientlyillustrates what activities werelogged/observed etc, no diagramand description is provided

2 Organization Information is presented in a

variety of different ways

including all of the following

methods: mind maps, charts,

diagrams, tables and graphs.

Information is presented in a


including most of the

following methods: mind

maps, charts, diagrams,

tables and graphs.

Information is presented in a


including a few of the following

methods: mind maps, charts,

diagrams, tables and graphs.

Information is presented only one

or two of the following methods:

mind maps, charts, diagrams,

tables and graphs.

3 Presentation ofinformation

Information is presented in avariety of different waysincluding all of the followingmethods:Mind maps, charts, diagrams,tables and graphs.

Information is presented in avariety of different waysincluding most of thefollowing methods:Mind maps, charts, diagrams,tables and graphs.

Information is presented in avariety of different waysincluding a few of the followingmethods:Mind maps, charts, diagrams,tables and graphs.

Information is presented only oneor two of the following methods:Mind maps, charts, diagrams,tables and graphs.

4 Verification oncommunicationwith supervisor

(Items discussed /signature)

Clear description of issuesdiscussed with supervisor.

Every meeting is varified withsignature and dated.

Good description of issuesdiscussed with supervisor.

Most of the meeting arevarified with signature anddated.

Fair description of issuesdiscussed with supervisor.A few meeting are nothighlighted

Some of the meeting are varifiedwith signature and dated.

Poor description of issuesdiscussed with supervisor.Most of the meeting are nothighlighted

Most of the meeting are notvarified with signature and dated.

5 Compliance to logbook format

At least 90% compliance withdirections.



Less than 70% compliance with

directions.

TOTAL SCORE /50


LOG BOOK RUBRICRUBRIC 4

PO10 – Communication Skill (To be Evaluated from Log Book)


Project Title:

Name of Supervisor:


SCORE10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

1 Organization & Style Excellent flow of information

according to the UniMAP standard

format and guidelines.

Good flow of information according to

the UniMAP standard format and

guidelines.

Moderate flow of information

according to the UniMAP standard

format and guidelines.

Poor flow of information

according to the UniMAP

standard format and guidelines.

2 Content & Knowledge Fully meet the level of knowledge

required by the course.

Sufficiently fulfil the level of

knowledge required by the course.

Partially meet the level of

knowledge required by the course.

Insufficient level of knowledge

required by the course.

3 Executive Summary The executive summary is professional

and creates a curiosity in the reader to

go further in the report.

The executive summary is just a

correct compounding of the report

content.

One of the important information

about the project is missing (e.g.

problem statement, solution

procedure, deliverables)

The executive summary lacks a

lot of relevant information about

the project.

4 Compose problem

statement

Clearly defined and state concise the

problem statement sentence to

address the issue.

Adequately define and state problem

statement to address the issue

Inadequate problem statement

and not addressing the real issues

Fail to identify and state the

problem statement

5 Rational of

techniques used

All techniques used during the

experiment very well explained.

All techniques used during the

experiment were explained.

Some techniques used during the

experiment were not explained

clearly.

Some techniques used during the

experiment were not explained.

6 Findings /Result

[Expected finding]

Thorough comparison and contrast of

findings are provided and relate to the

main discussion points in the order of

their appearance in the purpose

statement.

Focus is on research findings rather

than research methods.

Comparison and contrast of findings

are sufficiently provided

thoroughness.

Discussion of findings sufficiently

relates to the main discussion points in

the purpose statement.

Comparison and contrast of

findings are provided but lack

thoroughness.

Discussion of findings could relate

better to the main discussion

points in the purpose statement.

Comparison and contrast of

findings are lacking.

Discussion of findings does not

relate well to main discussion

points in the purpose statement.

7 Grammar & Spelling Rare errors in grammar and spelling

are observed in the report.

Seldom errors in grammar and spelling

are observed in the report.

Frequent errors in grammar and

spelling are observed in the report.

Abundance of errors in grammar

and spelling are observed in the

report.

8 References Optimum number current references

citation.

APA format is used accurately and

consistently in the paper and on the

“References” page.

Sufficient number current references

citation

APA format is used with minor errors.

Partially sufficient number current

references citation

There are frequent errors in APA

format.

Inadequate number current

references citation

Format of the document is not

recognizable as APA.

TOTAL SCORE /80

TOTAL MARKS = × 30% =

PROPOSAL DEFENSE RUBRICRUBRIC 5

PO10 – Communication Skill (To be Evaluated from Written Proposal)


Project Title:

Name of Supervisor:


SCORE10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

1 Eye Contact Holds attention of entire audience

with the use of direct eye contact,

seldom looking at notes.

Consistent use of direct eye

contact with audience, but still

returns to notes.

Displayed minimal eye contact

with audience, while reading

mostly from notes.

No eye contact with audience, as

entire report is rad from notes.

2 Body language Movements seem fluid and help

the audience visualize.

Made movements or gestures that

enhance articulation.

Very little movement or

descriptive gesture.

No movement or descriptive

gestures.

3 Poise Student displays relaxed, self-

confident nature about self, with

no mistakes.

Makes minor mistakes, but quickly

recovers from them; displays little

or no tension.

Displays mild tension; has

trouble recovering from

mistakes.

Tension and nervousness is

obvious; has trouble recovering

from mistakes.

4 Enthusiasm Demonstrates a strong, positive

feeling about topic during entire

presentation.

Occasionally shows positive

feelings about topic.

Shows some negativity toward

topic.

Shows absolutely no interest in

topic presented.

5 Elocution Student uses a clear voice and

correct, precise pronunciation of

terms so that all audience

members can hear presentation.

Student’s voice is clear. Student

pronounces most words correctly.

Most audience members can hear

presentation.

Student’s voice is low. Student

incorrectly pronounces terms.

Audience members have

difficulty hearing presentation.

Student mumbles, incorrectly

pronounces terms, and speaks

too quietly for a majority of the

audience members to hear.

6 Subject

knowledge

Student demonstrates full

knowledge by answering all

questions with explanations and

elaborations.

Students is at ease with expected

answers to all questions, without

elaboration.

Student is uncomfortable with

information and is able to

answer only rudimentary

questions.

Student does not have grasp of

information; student cannot

answer questions about subject. ____X2

7 Organization Student presents information in

logical, interesting sequence

which audience can follow.

Student presents information in

logical sequence which audience

can follow.

Audience has difficulty

following presentation because

student jumps around.

Audience cannot understand

presentation because there is no

sequence of information. ____X2

8 Mechanics Presentation has no misspellings

or grammatical errors.

Presentation has no more than

two misspellings and/or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has three

misspellings and/or

grammatical errors.

Student’s presentation has four

or more spelling and/or

grammatical errors.

TOTAL SCORE /80


PROPOSAL DEFENSE RUBRICRUBRIC 6

PO10 – Communication Skill (To be Evaluated from Proposal Defense)

GANTT

CHART &

MILESTONE

GANTT CHART (EXAMPLE)

Table 1: Table of Milestones

Milestone Date

Submission of Complete Proposal (Examiner) October 2015

Submission of Finalized Proposal October 2015

Completion of Fungi Isolation and Sample Collection November 2015

Completion of Sample Extraction December 2015

Completion of Sample Extract Isolation

Completion of Antifungal Test Analysis

February 2016

March 2016

Completion of Phytochemical Screening March 2016

Completion of Thesis Writing April 2016

Submission of Complete Thesis for Viva May 2016

Submission of Finalized Thesis May 2016

Table 2: Table of Milestones

MILESTONES (EXAMPLE)

Wish you all the best, Aware about your safety and other’s, Work Hard, Be Punctual, Be

productive, Be Polite, Be enthusiastic and have a

pleasant FYP journey ahead…

GOOD LUCK!

ALLPPT.com _ Free PowerPoint Templates, Diagrams and Charts

http://www.free-powerpoint-templates-design.com/free-powerpoint-templates-design

Final Year Project 2017/2018 - Universiti Malaysia...

Documents

Transcript of Final Year Project 2017/2018 - Universiti Malaysia...