Final Report Industrial Energy E˜ciency Project in Thailand

Final ReportIndustrial Energy E�ciency Project in ThailandPrepared byProject Management Unit

Contents IEE Project in Brief 03 - 08

Chapter 1 09 Project Management

1.1 Background 11 1.2 Project Design 12 1.3 Project Activities 13 1.4 Project Management Structure 16 1.5 GrantandCo-financing 17 1.6 EquipmentandAssets 17 1.7 ProjectIndicatorsandAchievement 18 1.8 Conclusion 22

Chapter 2 23 Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency

2.1 CapacityBuildingApproach 25 2.2 TrainingMaterialDevelopment 25 2.3AwarenessRaisingofEnergyEfficiencyintheIndustry 26 2.4BuildingCapacityofFactoryPersonnel 29 2.5ScalingUptheLocalImpactsthroughNationalExperts 31 2.6EnhancingtheCapacityofFinancialInstitutionsandBanks 33 2.7 ClosingtheLoopwithTrainingforotherrelevantstakeholders 35 2.8 CommunicationChannelsforPeer-to-PeerNetwork 37 2.9LessonsLearned 38

Chapter 3 39 Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization

3.1 EnMSImplementationinParticipatingFactories 41 3.2 System Optimization Assessment 42 3.3ImplementationImpactsofEnMSCapacityBuilding 44 3.4ImplementationImpactsofSOCapacityBuilding 44 3.5LessonsLearned 44

Chapter 4 45 Project Sustainability

4.1 KnowledgeSharing 47 4.2 Project’sContributiontoReplication 52 4.3 Market Transform for EnMS and SO 52

Chapter 5 53 Project Monitoring

5.1 Mid-termEvaluation 55

IEE Project in Brief

4


5


6


7


8


9

Chapter 1Project Management

Chapter 1

Project Management

10


In Chapter 1 the project background is described to provide the rationale of the project initiation. The project design, includ-ing its project activities and project management structure, is also explained. Insights to the project budget and co-financing from the project partners are provided. Lastly, the achievements of the pro-ject are illustrated based on the key performance indicators stated in the project document.

11


1.1Background

In Southeast Asia, Thailand has been a leaderin the promotion of energy efficiency. The Thaigovernment has been proactive in fostering anenergy efficiency culture and industry has beena receptive and active participant. Taking stock oftheenergysituationinthecountryintermsofhighenergy usage, import bills, energy security andenvironmental concerns, the Thai governmentstructured its energy policy, legal and regulatoryframeworks in line with the promotion of energyefficiencyandrenewableenergystartingfromtheearly1990’s.

Althoughenergyefficiencyhasbeenpromotedwiththe support from Thai government through policyand relevant funds, and adopted by Thai industrywith some investments, the level of achieve-ment was still limited based on three significantobservations, namely the low rate of industry’sparticipation to implement energy efficiencymeasures, the focus on component-based ener-gyefficiencymeasures,and thead-hocpracticeofEnergyManagementSystemwithinThaiindustry.

Overtime,theThaiindustryhasmadesomeinvestments in energy efficiency supported by several major initiatives such as the energy conservationfund,energyefficiencyrevolvingfund,utility-basedDSM,TotalEnergyManagement(TEM)programand active ESCO industry. In spite of this, realizationof energyefficiency initiativesby the industries toaddressthehighenergyconsumptionsituationhasbeenratherlow.Thisissupportedbytheindustrialinformationfromthe2007IndustrialCensusWholeKingdom (National Statistical Office) that only1,445 enterprises (5.5%) out of about 26,100medium and large factories have participated inthegovernmentinitiatives.

Thai industriesalso tendto focusmoreon individ-ualsystemcomponentssuchasmotors,pumps,orboilers, rather than on thewhole system. Currentpracticesshowmoreemphasisonthereplacementof components than on equipment maintenancepractices.Mostofthesereplacementsandalsotheoriginal design of the system are not taking intoaccount the energy optimization aspects and areoversizedormismatchedtothe loadrequirements,which are likely to remain for the lifetime of equipment.Moreover,itisobservedthatduringtheclassic energy audit, the typical energy efficiencymeasures such as efficient lighting, leak detections and insulationwere preferred by Thai

industry. There is limited penetration of energy efficientmeasures and technologies at the system levelstocapturehigherlevelofenergysavings.

During the PPG phase, the survey results showedthat only 18.8% of the respondent factories hadone person full time on energy management andabout44%ofthefactoriessurveyedspentlessthan10 hours per week on energy management. Itreflects that energy management is still ad-hocpracticeinThaiindustryasitisnotintegratedwiththemanagementsystem.For themediumto largeindustry, Thailand has introduced national energymanagement standards targeted towards designat- ed factories and buildings with power demand of morethan1,000kWand/orthatconsume20,000GJper year. This is a government initiative rooted inenergyconservationlawsandregulation.Whilethebasic notions of energy management has beenaccounted for in the regulation, the approach haslimited traction in terms of incorporating energy management in the current management structure,asopposed toother ISOstandardsadoptedby theindustriessuchasISO9000andISO14000.

In spite of present practices of energy efficiencyimprovements,thereisageneralconcernatthegov-ernment level about the inefficiency improvementfrom energy usage in Thai industry. The energyefficiency programs and initiatives in the countryhavenotdeliveredcomprehensivecapacitybuildingfocusedontheThaiindustrialsectorfortheuptakeofenergyefficiencyatthesystemlevels.Therefore,the Department of Industrial Promotion (DIP),Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI), and theDepartmentof IndustrialWorksunderMinistryofIndustry have cooperatedwith theDepartment ofAlternative Energy Development and Efficiency(DEDE)underMinistryofEnergytoaccessfundingfrom the Global Environment Facility (GEF) toimplement the Industrial Energy Efficiency (IEE)Project.TheUnitedNationsIndustrialDevelopmentOrganization (UNIDO), GEF’s executing agency,hasworkedcloselywithThaigovernmentpartnersin designing the Project, developing the projectproposalandfinallyimplementingtheIEEProject.

12


1.2Project Design

Initially,theIEEprojectwasa5-yearprojectstartingon 6 March 2012. However, during the projectimplementation, a 1-year extensionwas requestedandtheprojectistoterminateon30June2018.

The project partners are shown below.•DepartmentofIndustrialPromotion(DIP)•ThaiIndustrialStandardsInstitute(TISI)•DepartmentofIndustrialWorks(DIW)•DepartmentofAlternativeEnergy DevelopmentandEfficiency(DEDE)•SmallandMediumEnterprise DevelopmentBankofThailand•CIMBThai

Theobjectiveoftheprojectistopromoteindustrialenergy efficiency through adoption of ISO basedenergy management standards and systemoptimization approach for improvement of energyperformance of industries to make its operationsmorereliableandcompetitive.

Based on the review during the project initiationphase, theprojectwasdesigned to focuson threeareas, which supplement each other and areimperative in mobilizing the industry toward thesustainable practice of energy efficiency. Theseareas consist of:

1 Energy Management System (EnMS): Oneofthekeybarrierstosustainenergysavings infactoriesistheintermittentimplementationof energyefficiencymeasures.Thereisalsolimited monitoringon the implementedmeasures.Asa result, the energy savings in the factories are fluctuating.EstablishinganEnMSinthefactories isoneofthepotentialapproachestoincorporate energy efficiency as a regular working practice andsustainthesavingresultsintheorganization. For that reason, the Project promotes EnMS implementation to enhance the industry’s competitivenessthroughthereductionofenergy consumption,whichinturncontributestolower GHGemissions.

2 System Optimization (SO): The typical energymeasures emanate from the component-based assessment of, for example, boilersandaircompressors.Byconsideringonly onecomponent inthesystem,e.g.boiler inthe steam system, the energy efficiency measures implementedmaycauseanegativeimpactonthe otherpartsofthesystemandreducethepotential savings.TheProjectpromotesasystemapproach toenhancetheenergysavingopportunitiesand capture alternative perspectives of energy efficiency assessment. The concept of system optimization,which includes the assessment of fourareas-generation, distribution, end use and recovery -, is introduced to Thai industry. In additiontothetypicalenergyaudit,thefactories with EnMS implemented can use the system optimizationassessmenttoidentifytheimprove- ment opportunities during the energy planning process.

3 Financial evaluation of energy efficiency projects: The investment for energyefficiencyopportuni- ties may vary from no investment to high investments. It is a good practice to financially evaluate the opportunities before preparing the actionplanand implementing themeasures.To facilitatetheimplementationofenergyefficiency measures,theProjectprovidestheknowledgeof financial evaluation at two levels, the project evaluation for internal approval and theproject evaluationforloansubmission.

13


To promote the three knowledge areas – EnMS,SOandfinancialevaluation, theprojectdecided todeployacapacitybuildingapproachfollowedbytheimplementation of demonstration projects, whichshowcase the EnMS and SO implementation insome selected factories. For technical transferprojectslikethisone,ithasbeenshownthatskillstransfer through education is more effective andsustainable than solely transferring the technologies/ approach. Enhancing the knowledge and capacitiesatthelocallevelensuresthatsolutionsare not justapplied once, but will continuously be adapted to the future and local context. The capacity building activities in the project are designed to provide different level of knowledge and practices to different stakeholders by considering their involvement in EnMS and SOimplementation.

To supplement the capacity building, the demon-stration of EnMS and SO implementation providemore information and act as the evidence toconvince other factories to adopt the approach.Theconsultancyservices for these implementation projects were carried out by the National Experts(NEs)trainedwithintheProject’scapacitybuildingprogram. Thereby, the NEs could apply theknowledgeacquiredandformpartofanetworkforthedisseminationofEnMSandSOimplementationinthefuture.

The linkage of these three areasis shown in Figure 1.1

Figure 1.1 Linkage of EnMS, System Optimization

and financial evaluation

FinancialEvaluation

EnMSSystem

Optimization

1.3Project Activities

The project activities have been carefully designed to integrate the focus areas and implementationapproaches.ThetechnicaltransferfrominternationalexpertstoThaiexperts,factorypersonnelandrelevantstakeholders has been carried out with adaptation to the Thai context. The project activities are grouped intofourcomponentsasshownbelow.

1 ISO compliant energy management systems: ThiscomponentisdesignedtoincreasethenationalawarenessonISO50001,todeliverthe ISO50001trainingtonationalexperts,factorymanagementandpersonnel,andtoestablish apeer-to-peernetworkamongindustrialenterprises.

2 Industrial energy systems optimization: Theenergysystemsoptimizationtraining,consistingofsteam,compressedair,fan,and pumpsystem,isdeliveredtonationalexperts,factorymanagementandpersonnelaswell as manufacturers and vendors.

3 Enhancement of industrial EE financing capacity: Theindustrialenergyefficiencyfinancingcapacitywillbeenhancedthroughtraining forbanks/financialinstitutionsandfactorymanagement.

4 Implementation of energy management and systems optimization projects: Toincreasetheadoptionofenergymanagementstandardsandsystemsoptimization, theprojectwillfacilitatetheimplementationofenergymanagementsystem(ISO50001) andenergysystemoptimizationprojectsinselectedfactories.

14


The detailed activities of each component are described in Table 1.1.

Component 1: ISO compliant energy management system

Component 2: Industrial energy systems optimization

Table 1.1 Summary of project activities

Output Project Activities

Output 1.1:Trainingmaterialandtoolsonenergymanagementdeveloped

Output 1.2:NationalawarenesscampaignlaunchedonISO50001

Output 1.3:Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrained on energy management systems

Output 1.4: Peer-to-Peer network betweenindustrialenterprisescreatedandoperational

Output 2.1:Trainingmaterials,softwareandtoolsonsystemsoptimizationdeveloped

Output 2.2: Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrainedonoptimizationofsteam,compressedair,fan and pumping systems

Output 2.3: Equipmentvendors/supplierstrainedonsystemsoptimization

•Reviewofexistingenergymanagementactivities andidentificationofindustryneeds•Preparation,development,andproductionof trainingmaterialsandtoolsinEnglishandThai

•Productionofpromotional/mediamaterialto promotetheISO50001standard•ProductionofarticlestointroduceISO50001in standardnewspapers,journalsandmagazines•EventlaunchofthestandardISO50001/ thelaunchofUNIDO’sIEEproject•Organizationofseminarroadshowsinthe country tointroduceISO50001toentrepreneurs, membersofThaiindustryassociations/organizations

•Selecttraineestobecomenationalexpertson energy management based on agreed criteria•Providelogisticssupportforthetraining• Conduct trainings on energy management systemfornationalexperts• Conduct trainings on energy management forfactorypersonnel

•Exchangeinformationwithindustriesand establishapeer-to-peernetwork

•Preparation,development,andproductionof trainingmaterialandtoolsinEnglishandThai

•Selecttraineestobecomenationalexpertson systems optimization based on agreed criteria•Providelogisticssupportforthetraining• Conduct trainings on system optimization fornationalexperts•Selectfactoriesandconducttrainingsonsystem optimizationforfactorypersonnel

•Selectequipmentsuppliersandconduct trainingsfor50vendorseachonsystems optimizationofpumping,steam,fan,and compressed air systems

15


Component 3: Enhancement of industrial EE financing capacity

Component 4: Implementation of energy management and systems optimization projects

Output 3.1:Harmonizedprojectevaluationcriteria

Output 3.2:Capacityofbanks/FIsenhancedonEEprojectsfinancing

Output 3.3:Trainingmaterialdevelopedandindustrymanagerstrainedonthedevelopmentoffinancialproposals

Output 4.1: Energy managementsystemsimplemented

Output 4.2: Documented systemoptimization demonstration projects

Output 4.3:Recognitionprogramdevelopedandimplemented

•Developandharmonizecriteriaforevaluationof industrialenergyefficiencyprojectsforfinancial institutions

•Developguidelinesforenergyefficiencyprojects evaluationbythefinancialinstitutions•Disseminateenergyefficiencyprojectevaluation criteriaandguidelinesamongfinancialinstitutions

•Compileanddisseminateinformationon financialincentives/schemesavailableforinvest- mentsinenergyefficiencyprojectsinThailand•Developtrainingmaterialandtoolsonbankable energyefficiencyprojectsforindustrialfacility personnel•Trainfactorypersonnelonenergyefficiency financingandbankableenergyefficiency projectsproposalsdevelopment

• 200industrialenterprisesimplementoperational improvement projects after receiving energy management trainings• 50industrialenterprisesimplementactivities towardconformancewithISO50001•Registrationofenterpriseswhoimplemented projectsinthepeer-to-peernetworks

• 75assessmentsundertakentoidentifysystems optimizationopportunitiesintheindustrial facilities• 50industrialenterprisesimplementsystems optimization projects

• Set up energy performance indicators for recognizingimprovementonenergyefficiency inthepeer-to-peernetworks•DIPandDEDErecognizesindustriesthroughthe awardsbasedontheenergysavingperformance indicators

TheprojectactivitiesaimtosupportThaiindustries,especiallythetargetsectorsidentifiedduringtheproject’sPPGstudy.Theinitialsixindustrysectorswereselectedbasedonthecountryneedsandpriorities.Thetargetsectorsregroup48.3%oftheestablishmentsinthemanufacturingsector.Therewereabout12,600mediumandlargeenterprisesinthesesectors.Thelistofthetargetsectorsisshownbelow.

1 Foodproductsandbeverages

2 Textiles

3 Chemicals

4 Rubberandplasticproducts

5 Non-metallicandmineral

6 Basicmetal

Duringthe2ndprojectsteeringcommittee(PSC)meetingon14May2013,thecommitteehasdecidedtoaddthePulpandPapersectorinthelistoftargetsectors.Therefore,therearetotally7targetsectorsintheproject.

16


Figure 1.2 Structure of Project Steering Committee Figure 1.3 Structure of Working Group

Chairperson(DG of DIP)

Chairperson(DIP)

Vice Chair(DDG of DIP)

Vice Chair(DSG of TISI)

Sceretary (PMU)

Member(DIP)

Member(SME BANK)

Member(TISI)

Member(CIMB)

Member(DEDE)

Member(FTI)

Member(DIW)

Member(OIE)

Member(UNIDO)

For theday-to-day operation of theproject, theProjectManagementUnit (PMU)was in charge. ThePMUprepared reports to fulfillGEF’s andUNIDO’s requirements. Themembers ofPMUconsistedof aNationalProjectCoordinator(NPC),aProjectAssistant,ProjectEngineers,andaDriver

1.4 Project Management Structure

TheimplementationofallactivitiesplannedundertheprojectwillbesupervisedbyDIPthroughtheProjectSteeringCommittee(PSC).Initially,thePSCconsistedofhighlevelrepresentativesfromtheDIP,TISI,DEDE,DIW,participatingfinancialinstitutions,industryassociationsandUNIDO.UndertheguidanceofDIPduringthesetupofthePSC,therepresentativeofOfficeofIndustrialEconomics(OIE)wasinvitedtojointhePSC.ThestructureofPSCisshowninFigure1.2andthelistofPSC’smembersisinSessionA.1ofAnnexA.

TheprimaryrolesofthePSCaretoprovideoverallguidancetotheimplementationoftheprojectandtoensuregood coordination among participating agencies and other organizations. The PSCwill meet every year tomonitorimplementationprogressandconfirmtheworkplanforthesubsequentyear.

TherewerefivePSCmeetingsheldduringtheprojectimplementation.TheminutesofmeetingofPSCcanbefoundinSessionA.2toA.7ofAnnexA.

SincethePSC’smeetingwasorganizedonceayear,thePSCagreedtosetupaWorkingGroup(accordingtothedecisionmadeatthePSCmeetingon19February2014),whichwouldberepresentedbythefocalpointsofeachgovernmentpartners,tofacilitatethemanagementoftheprojectandworkcloselywithPMUasassignedbythePSC.Thestructureof theWorkingGroup isshown inFigure1.3andtheWorkingGroup’smembers arelistedinSessionA.1ofAnnexA.

Vice Chair(TISI)

Member(DIP)

Member(TISI)

Member(DEDE)

Member(DIW)

Sceretary(DIP, PMU)

17


1.6Equipment and Assets

One of the identified barriers to energy efficiencyimplementationisthelackofequipmenttomeasurethe energy data, which is used to analyze theperformance indicators of the energy system. Forthat reason the project has allocated part of itsbudget to procure equipment,whichwas used fortrainingandsupportingtheparticipatingindustriesduringtheEnMSimplementationandSOassessment.At the end of the project, the equipment wastransferred to the project’s partners according tothe PSC’s decision made at the 5th PSC meetingon 17 January 2017. The list of equipment andthe receiving partner is shown in Session C.1 of AnnexC.

Inaddition,theprojecthasprocuredofficefurniture,computers, phones, office supplies, and vehicle tosupporttheoperationoftheproject.Attheendofthe project, these assets were transferred to DIPaccording to the PSC’s decision made at the 5thPSCmeetingon17January2017.ThelistofassetsisshowninSessionC.2ofAnnexC.

1.5Grant and Co-financing

TheGEFgrantfortheprojectwas$3,620,000.Theco-financing contribution from Thai partner statedintheprojectdocumentis$15,645,000intermsofcash,in-kindandloan.

The GEF grant of $3,620,000 was utilized forthe project implementation. Since the projectemphasized on the technical knowledge transfer,about 39% of the grant was used for the inter-national experts. The national experts and staffswere accounted for 20% of the expenditure.The cost of subcontracts for workshop/trainingorganizing and other relevant studies was about15%.Theexpenditurefortheequipmenttosupporttrainingandimplementationwasabout10%ofthegrant. The details of budget allocation and grantutilizationareshowninSessionB.1ofAnnexB.

Duringtheprojectimplementation,thePMUtrackedthe co-financing made by the Project’s partners(detail is inSessionB.2ofAnnexB).TheMinistryofIndustrycontributedabout$1,708,600(70%ofthe co-financing stated in the project document).The DEDE contributed $1,633,885, which morethan the amount stated in the project document.Theindustriesparticipatingintheprojectactivitiesused$1,328,605(27%oftheco-financingstatedintheprojectdocument)offinancialsupportproductsprovidedbyDEDE.Theindustrialsector,whichwasnotincludedintheprojectdocument,hasalsomadeagreatcontributiontotheprojectwiththeamountof$1,825,893. This reflects thewillingness of the industry tomanage their energy and reduce theirenergy costs.

18


1.7Project Indicators and Achievement

Byfollowingagoodpracticeofprojectplanning,theprojecthasestablishedtargetsattheproject leveland theactivitylevel.ThemonitoringoftheresultshasbeenplannedwiththeguidancefromPSCandtheproject’spartners.At the terminationphase, it canbe concluded that the results of theproject implementationhassuccessfully achieved the targets stated in the project document, except for one activity, which will be describedlater.

Fortheprojectimplementationperiod,thefollowingproject’stargetshavebeenset.• 83,712MWhofelectricitysaving• 1,914,142GJoffuelsaving• 196,757tCO2ofGHGemissionreduction

Based on the energy savings information of 129 factories participating in the implementation supportedactivities, the project andwilling to share such informationwith the project, itwas found that the energysaving and GHG emission reduction of the energy efficiency measures implemented by the participatingfactorieshavewellachievedtheproject’starget.Theelectricitysavingsamountto111,307MWh.Thefuelsavingis2,713,001GJ, and theGHGemission reduction is equivalent to247,047 tCO2. Thecomparisonof surveyresultsandtargetisshowninFigure1.4.Thedetailsoftheimplementedmeasuresandthecalculationofenergysaving can be found in AnnexD.

Tokeeptrackoftheproject’sactivities,theindicatorsandtargetshavebeenincludedintheprojectdocument.Mostactivitieshavewellachievedtheirtargets.Theindicators,targetsandachievementofeachcomponentisshowninTable1.2.

Figure 1.4Energy savings and the GHG reduction of the energy efficiency measures implemented

by the participating factories compared with the project’s targets

Target 83,712 1,914,142 196,756

Electricity Savings (MWh) Fuel Savings (GJ) GHG Reduction (tCO2)

Project’sachievement 111,307 2,713,001 247,047

19


Component 1: ISO compliant energy management systems

Component 2: Industrial energy systems optimization

Table 1.2 Indicators, target and achievement of each component

Output TargetIndicators Achievement

Output 1.1: Trainingmaterialandtoolsonenergy managementdeveloped

Output 1.2: Nationalawareness campaign launchedonISO50001

Output 1.3:Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrainedonenergy managementsystems

Output 1.4: Peer-to-Peer network betweenindustrialenterprisescreatedandoperational

Output 2.1: Trainingmaterials,softwareandtoolsonsystemsoptimizationdeveloped

Output 2.2: Nationalexperts/factorypersonneltrainedonoptimizationofsteam,compressedair,fan and pumpingsystems

Output 2.3: Equipmentvendors/supplierstrained on systemsoptimization

Availabilityoftranslatedmaterialsandtools

Promotionalliteraturedistributed to industriestopromotetheadoptionofISO50001

• 500factorymanagers attendthemanagement workshop

•300factoriessendtheir personneltoEnMSuser training

• 50NationalExperts trained on EnMS

Allparticipatingenterprisessharetheirimplementationplanonenergymanagementonthenetworkandlearnfromothers’experienceandresults

Availabilityoftranslatedmaterialsandtools

•400factorypersonnel attended SO user training

• 50NationalExperts trained on SO

Trainingof50equipmentsuppliers/vendorsofenergyefficientproductsinSO

Done

Done

100%(612managers)

100%(364factories)

100%(62NEs)

Done

Done

100%(1,126personnel)

96%(48NEs)

100%(60companies)

Trainingmaterialon EnMS provided toindustrialenterprises

Nationalcampaignprovided informationto industry to adoptISO50001

Numberoftrainednationalexpertsandfactorypersonnel

Networkestablishedandused to support program recognition and presentsavingsresultfromenergy management

TrainingmaterialonSOprovidedtoindustrialenterprises

Numberoftrainednationalexpertsandfactorypersonnel

Numberoftrainedequipmentvendors/suppliers

20


Component 3: Enhancement of industrial EE financing capacity


Output 3.1:Harmonizedprojectevaluationcriteria

Output 3.2:Capacityofbanks/FIsenhancedonEEprojectsfinancing

Output 3.3:Trainingmaterialdevelopedandindustrymanagers trained onthedevelopmentoffinancialproposals

CriteriaforevaluatingEEprojectsaredevelopedandharmonizedbymainfinancialinstitutionsinThailand

StrengthenedcapacityoffinancialinstitutionsandlocalbanksonEEprojectsevaluation

AvailabilityoftranslatedmaterialsandguidelinesspecificallysupportingthedevelopmentoffinancialproposalsforEEprojects

Industrialfacilitymanagers/personnelhavethecapacitytoanalyzeSOandenergymanagement projects anduse energy and O&M costs reduction project

ReportCompleted

Done

Done

Done

EvaluationcriteriaareharmonizedwithinthefinancialinstitutionstohelpthemselectbestEE projects

Numberoffinancialinstitutionsandlocalbankspersonneltrainedto understand mainfeatures of EE projectsand better appraiseEEprojectsproposals.

Trainingmaterialrelatingtofinancingofenergyefficiencyprojectdevelopmentarepro-vided to industries

Numberoftrainedfacilitymanagers/personnelinindustrialenergyefficiencyprojectdevelopment

Table 1.2 Indicators, target and achievement of each component (cont.)

21



Component 4: Implementation of energy management and systems optimization projects

Output 4.1:Energy managementsystemsimplemented

Output 4.2:Documentedsystem optimizationdemonstration projects

Output 4.3: Recognitionprogramdevelopedandimplemented

200factoriesadoptedenergymanagementplansandcompletedoperationalimprovement projects

50factoriesadoptedandimplementedISO50001

Participating factoriesregisteredwiththepeer-to-peer networkreport energy savings

75systemassessmentsconducted

50completedsystemsoptimization projects

25casestudiesshowingGHGemissionreductions

Formalrecognitionoffactoriesachievingpower/fuelconsumptionreductionsreflectedingovernment reports

100%(200factories)

100%

Done

100%(76assessment)

100%(74projects)

100%

Done

Numberoffactorieswithenergymanagementplansimplemented

Numberofcase studies

Numberoffactoriesregistered for peer-to-peer network

Numberofcompletedsteam,pumping,fanand compressed airsystems assessments

Numberofcompletedsystems optimizationprojects

Recognition program for participating companiesestablishedbasedonsuccessfulachievements

Table 1.2 Indicators, target and achievement of each component (cont.)

22


1.8Conclusion

The project has been under implementation for 6.5years.Theactualimplementationwascompleted within 6 years. The 6 months of terminationphase were used for report preparation and finalevaluation.

The project has achieved all the indicators set at theactivitylevel,exceptforthenumberofNational Experts on System Optimization, which onlycounted48NEsfromthetargetof50NEs.

The project has achieved the targets in terms of energy savings and GHG emission reduction. The electricity savings amount to 111,307 MWh. The fuel saving is 2,713,001 GJ, and the GHG emission reduction is equivalent to 247,047 tCO2.

23


Chapter 2

Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency

24

Chapter 2Capacity Building on Industrial Energy Efficiency

This chapter describes the capacity building activi-ties conducted during the project. It starts with the description of the capacity building approach originally used and its change as a results of participant’s feedback and gap analysis. The next sections present the training materialsdeveloped during the pro-ject implementation, the training activities conduct-ed, and the communication channels for the peer-to-peer network. Finally, the lessons learned from the capacity building program are reported.

25


2.1Capacity Building Approach

Theaimofcapacitybuildingprogramistodevelopand enhance the capacity of the relevant stake-holderswhoplaymajorrolesintheimplementationof energy management system and systemoptimization. The program is designed to providedifferent levels of knowledge from overview toin-depth technical trainingwith different learningapproaches such as through lectures, workshopsand on-the-job training to ensure its suitability torelevant stakeholders. The relevant stakeholderstargetedbythecapacitybuildingprogramincludedfactorymanagement,factorypersonnel,researchers,lecturers, government officers, consultants, bankpersonnel, and equipment vendors/suppliers.Additionalstakeholders,namelyESCOs,equipmentservice providers, certification body (CB) and accreditation body (AB),were added at the imple-mentation start as a result of the stakeholder analysis.

After conducting several trainings andworkshops,the feedback from theparticipantswereanalyzed.The project has revised two existing trainings,awareness workshop and vendor training, anddesigned 6 new training courses consisting of CBTraining, AB Training, EnMS Intensive Training,SSO Technical Training, CaSO Technical Training,BiomassBoiler’sOperatorsTraining.

The detail of capacity building program and itsadjustmentundertheproject is in Session E.1 andE.2ofAnnexE.

2.2 TrainingMaterial Development

Todevelopthetrainingmaterial,theprojectstartedwith reviewing the trainingmaterials used by theproject’spartnersandotheragenciestounderstandwhat has been delivered for industries andwhat has been left out. The review results werecommunicatedtotheinternationalexpertsinorderto adjust UNIDO’s training materials and tools tosuit the Thai context. The training materials forthe awareness workshop and 2-day user training,whichwereinEnglish,havebeentranslatedtoThailanguage. All training materials were printed anddisseminatedduringthetrainingsandworkshops.

The materials and tools allowed industrial facility managers and personnel to understand the importance of energy management systems/standardsandsystemoptimization,andactas thesources for industry to start implementing EnMSand/or conduct system optimization assessmentthemselves.

Forthefinancingcomponent,thetrainingmaterialswere developed based on the training need assessment results conducted with banks andindustries. Interviews and questionnaires/surveyswere used to collect data. Two sets of materialsand tools were developed, one for banks and onefor industries.

Detail of trainingmaterials and tools is inSessionE.3ofAnnexE.

26


2.3Awareness Raising of Energy Efficiency in the Industry

2.3.1 Inception Workshop

The project’s partners and UNIDO co-organized the inception workshop on 6 June 2012 to announce thestartingoftheprojectandhighlightingtheprojectactivitiestothetarget industriesandotherstakeholders.TheMinisterofIndustry,H.E.Mr.PongsvasSvasti,gavethekeynotespeechandwelcomedtheaudience.ThemanagementofDIP,TISI,DEDEandCIMBThaijoinedthediscussionpanelandemphasizedtheircooperationundertheprojecttosupporttheindustrytoachievetheirenergyefficiencytarget.Therewere146participantsattending the inception workshop. The group picture of the high-level management participating in theinceptionworkshopisshowninFigure2.1.

Figure 2.1 The Minister of Industry and other management in the project

2.3.2 Awareness Campaign

The national awareness campaign providedinformation on ISO 50001 energy managementstandards to industries, equipment suppliers,and service providers by highlighting the benefitsof shifting from current operations to energymanagement practices. The introduction to thesystemapproachwasalsoincludedinthecampaignto promote system optimization. The campaignconsistedof3elementsasdescribedbelow.

1 Project’s awareness raising: To increase the awarenessandreliabilityoftheIEEproject,the project distributed a bag and pen with the project’stitleandwebsiteduringtheworkshops and trainings.Manyparticipants used the bag andpenafterattendingtheproject’sactivities, whichhelppromotetheprojecttoothers.

2 Information dissemination: The information materialsdisseminatedbytheprojectconsisted of a leaflet, a notebook, roll-ups, and articles. Theprojectdevelopedthe leafletandnotebook toexplainwhattheprojectisabout,theconcept ofEnMSandSO,and thecontactdetails.The leafletandnotebookshown inFigure2.2 were distributedduringtheworkshopsandtrainings. The leaflet was also used to introduce the projectduringthemeetingwithindustries.

The roll-upmaterialswere installed during the workshops and trainings to allow the partici- pantstolearnmoreabouttheproject.

InApril 2017, anEnMSarticlewritten by the PMU was published in the quarterly journal producedbytheOfficeofIndustrialEconomics. 3

27


Figure 2.2 Project leaflet

3 Awareness workshop: Theawarenessworkshopsinthefirstyearofprojectimplementationwerecarried out by international experts with a half-day presentation. The translators were used to translate from English to Thai. The presentation covered the global and Thai energy situation, climate change threat, challenges of energy management, role of EnMS in improving competitiveness, overview of energy managementsystemanditsbenefit,introductionofsystemoptimization,andhowtoinitiateEnMS.After theNationalTrainersfromthe1stbatchofEnMSexpert trainingwereready, theNationalTrainerstook over the role of speakers for the awareness workshops. The afternoon session was added to include the sharing of experiences from the representatives of host facilities. 18 awareness workshops were carried out from 2012 to 2016 with the attendance of 604 factory managers from 535 target factories.Thetargetintheprojectdocumentstated500factorymanagers.Thus,theactualperformance achieved is equivalent to 121% of the target. The details of the awareness workshops is shown in SessionE.4ofAnnexE.

28


2.3.3 Final Seminar

To disseminate the project’s results, the projectpartners, together with the PMU, arranged thefinal seminar on 20 December 2017. There were169participants,39femaleand122male,attendingthefinalseminarconsistingof111factorymanagersand personnel, 4 consultants, 3 representatives from institutes, 16 government officers, 16 repre-sentatives from equipment vendors and service providers,18representativesfromCBs,and1from theothercategory.

TheseminarstartedbyawelcomespeechgivenbyMr. Stein Hansen, Regional Director and UNIDORepresentative in Thailand. Then, Mr. SanjayaShrestha, project manager, provided brief infor-mation about the project and its achievements.Although the project was approaching thetermination phase, the project partners wouldcontinue to provide their support to the industry.The presentation of what will be provided waspresented by the representatives of project’s part-ners. One of the objectives of the final seminarwas to convince additional factories to implementEnMS and system optimization. Therefore, thelessons learned from industries and success casesfrom the selected factories were presented to theparticipants by the national experts and thefactories’ management. Lastly, the recognition ofthefactoriessuccessfully implementingtheenergyefficiency measures was carried out through thecase study award competition. One company received the award for best case study and 3companies received awards for outstanding case study.Theawardandcertificateswerehandedoverto the companies’ management by Mr. SakolThinakul, representative of the Thai GEF FocalPoint. Pictures of the final seminar are shown inFigure2.3.

Figure 2.3 Final seminar

29


2.4Building Capacityof Factory Personnel

Toimproveenergyefficiency,thefactorypersonnelplay a critical role as they are the ones whoimplement EnMS and optimize the systems suchassteam,compressedair,pumping,orfansystem.Although trainings on EnMS and energy conser-vationwere available in themarket, it was foundthat the contents of the courses offered by theprojectweredifferentfromothertrainingsastheyemphasized practical knowledge and the use ofcalculation tools to support the assessments. Thetrainingcoursesespeciallydesignedforthefactorypersonnel consisted of EnMS 2-day user training,SO 2-day user trainings, and financial evaluationof industrial energy efficiency projects. Therewere three more advanced courses available forthe factory personnel who wanted to learn moretechnical-oriented knowledge and practice onmeasurement,namelytheEnMSintensivetraining,theSSOtechnicaltrainingandtheCASOtechnicaltraining.

2.4.1 EnMS 2-day User Training

The existingEnMS trainingwasprovided by TISI.ThecoursecontentfollowedtheISO50001standard,clause by clause. After the project started, TISIandtheprojectagreedtousetheEnMS2-dayusertraining as a standard EnMS course for TISI. TISIsupported the project by arranging 3 to 4 EnMStrainings per year. TISI and the project have intotalco-organized24EnMSusertrainingstocoverall regions in Thailand. There were 796 factorymanagementandpersonnelfrom364targetfactoriesattending the user training. The target in projectdocument is300target factories.Thus, theactualperformance achieved 121% of the target. ThedetailsoftheEnMS2-dayusertrainingisshowninSessionE.5ofAnnexE.

2.4.2 SO 2-day User Training

DIP has provided energy-related trainings underthe Total Energy Management (TEM) projectsince 2004. In the TEM project, both public andin-housetrainingswereofferedfortheparticipatingfactories. However, the TEM’s training mostlyfocused on awareness raising. Therefore, DIP andthe project agreed to co-organize SO trainings forfour systems consisting of Steam System Optimi-zation (SSO),CompressedAirSystemOptimization(CASO), Pumping System Optimization (PSO) andFan SystemOptimization (FSO). Each SO trainingwasorganizedfor2dayswithamixoflecturesandexercisesusingcomputersandcalculators.DIPandthe project have in total co-organized 31 SO usertrainingstocoverallregionsinThailand.Therewere1,126 factory personnel from 344 target factoriesattendingtheusertraining.Thetargetintheprojectdocumentstated400factorypersonnel.Thus, theactualperformanceachievedis282%ofthetarget.Thedetailsofthe2-daySOusertrainingisshownin SessionE.6ofAnnexE.

2.4.3 EnMS Intensive Training

In2016,TISIandtheprojectagreedtodevelopthenew EnMS intensive courses consisting of 4-dayclassroom training, homework, and teleconferenceto discuss issues with international experts. Thiscourse was intended to provide more technically-oriented knowledge on EnMS implementation.The training was divided into 2 modules with2-dayclassroomtrainingeach.Thehomeworkwasassigned after the 1st module with the monthlyteleconference support from the internationalexperts. The 1st module was organized during29-30June2016andthe2ndmodulewasorganizedduring 12-13 September 2016. There were 36participants, 10 female and 26male, fromvariousindustrial sectors, CBs, TISI, consultancies, andacademia. The certificates were granted to theparticipantswhopassed the exam,whichwas satonavoluntarybasis.Therewere22participantswhosattheexamand16outof22gotthecertificate.

30


2.4.4 SO Technical Training

Basedonthereviewoffeedbackfromparticipantsand the vendor’s brainstorm session, DIP and theproject added new technical courses on SSO andCASO. The 2-day technical trainings with 2-hourwebinarsweredesignedtofillthegapbetweentheuser trainingandexpert training.Theyweremoreadvancedthantheusertraining,however,theydidnotincludetheopportunitytoconductassessmentwiththehostfacility.Tocompensatethishands-onexperience, the participants would learn fromexercises based on actual cases and the demon-stration of equipment usage. The certification ofcompletion was awarded to participants whoattended the whole training session and success-fullypassedtheexam.Alltechnicaltrainingsweredeliveredbytheinternationalexpertsandnationaltrainers.

The 1st SSO technical training was conductedduring6-7 June2016. Therewere23participants,4 female and 19 male, attending the training. 14outof23participantssattheexamwithasuccessrateof57%or8participants.The2ndSSOtechnicaltrainingwasconductedduring11-12October2016.Therewere18participants,6 femaleand12male,attending the training. 15 out of 18 participantssat the exam with a success rate of 80% or 12participants. The CASO technical training wasconducted during 22-23 September 2016. Therewere 31 participants, 6 female and 25 male,attending the training. 18 out of 31 participantssat the exam with a success rate of 72% or 13participants.

2.4.5 Biomass Boiler’s Operator Training

In2017,DIPandtheprojectidentifiedthetrainingneedofbiomassboileroperatorsfromthestudyofbiomassboilersanditssteamsystemimprovement.Thebiomassoperator’strainingcoursewasthereforedeveloped to provide a better understanding ofbiomass boiler operation and how to optimize itssteam system. Four trainings were organized inSamut Sakhon, Nakhon Ratchasima, Surat Thani,andBangkok.Therewereatotal206participants,28 female and 178 male, attending the trainings.122 out of 206 participants were from the targetsectors.

2.4.6 Training on Financial Evaluationof Industrial Energy Efficiency Projectsfor Industries

The 2-day training on financial evaluation ofindustrial energy efficiency project for industrieswasdesignedtofamiliarizethefactory’spersonneltothebank’sunderwritingprocessandintroducingthe toolsand ratios thatare typicallyused for theconsideration process. The workshop on financingand ratio calculationof corporate cashflow in thecase energy efficiency project implementationwasconducted on the second day of the training toallow theparticipants topracticewith actual caseinformation. DEDE and the project co-organizedthreetrainingsduring2-3March2015,23-24March2015 and 23-24 April 2015 in Bangkok with 87participants,10femaleand77male,from40targetfactories.

31


2.5Scaling Up the Local Impacts through National Experts

The UNIDO international expert team providedtraining for Thai experts. These individuals sub-sequently assumed the roles of National EnMSexperts and National SO experts. They became asource of national energy management and SOexpertise, and served as multipliers for projectimpacts such as trainers and consultants availableto the industry. To build up the training capacityand ensure the consistency of training delivery,the selected national trainers were specificallytrainedtodelivertrainingsinthreestages:observingthe international experts teaching, co-teachingwith the international experts, and teaching withinternational experts observing and commentingonteachingtechniques. Inadditiontothesesteps,a train-the-trainer session was organized betweentheinternationalexpertsandtheselectednationaltrainers to go through the training materials,exercisesandtrainingactivities.

To recruit candidates for the expert trainingprogram, the PMU prepared the announcementanddistributeditthroughDIP’s,TISI’sandDEDE’snetwork. The applicantswere requested to submitCVs and attend an interview session with theinternational experts. The successful applicantswere thereafter invited to attend the expert training.

The EnMS expert training was divided into 3modulesdeliveredwithin 10 to 12months.During the1st and 2ndtrainingmodule,thetraineesworkedcloselywiththeassignedhostfacilitytoimplementEnMS.The trainees and international expertshadmonthlyteleconferencestosharetheprogressanddiscuss problems and issues faced in the imple-mentation phase. Inmodule 3, the trainees had achance to practice the internal audit at the host facilityundertheinternationalexperts’supervision.In order to earn the title ofUNIDO’s national ex-perts, the traineeshad to submitafinal reportontheEnMS implementation in thehost facility andsuccessfullypasstheEnMSexpertexamination.

Therewere twobatchesofEnMSexpert trainingsorganized during the course of theproject. The 1st

trainingwasorganizedduring2012and2013,andthe2ndbatchwasorganizedduring2014and2015.Forthe1stbatch,therewere38participantswith29successfulnationalexperts,4femaleand25male.Forthe2ndbatch,therewere46participantswith33 successful national experts, 11 female and 22male.Intotal,therewere62qualifiedEnMSnationalexperts, which account for 124% of the project’starget. The list of all EnMS national experts is showninSessionE.7ofAnnexE.

The typicalmodel of SO expert training consistedof 1-2 days classroom training, 2-3 days on-sitetraining, system optimization assessment with acandidate plant, and examination. To be entitledas a qualified SO national expert, the traineeshad to attend all training sessions, complete theassessmentreportandsuccessfullypassSOexpertexamination.

ThereweretwobatchesofSSOexperttraining,twobatches of CASO expert training, two batches ofPSOexpert training,andonebatchofFSOexperttraining. The details of each SO expert training isshowninTable2.1.Intotal,therewere48qualifiedSOnationalexperts,6 femaleand42male,whichaccount for96%of theproject’s target.The list ofallSOnationalexperts is shown inSessionE.8ofAnnexE.

32


Table 2.1 Detail of SO expert training

The PMU identified the potential barriers causingalowernumberofnationalexpertsthanexpected.Theanalysis isbasedonthediscussionwithsomecandidates, feedback from the participants, andobservationduringtrainings.Thepotentialbarriersinclude:

• Thelongerperiodbetweenthelastdayoftraining andexaminationdate,thelargerthedropoutof thecandidates.Onaverage,76%ofcandidatessat theexamination.ThecandidatesfromPSOexpert trainingbatch1andbatch2attendedtheexam onlyattherateof65%and27%,respectively.It tookmorethanayearafterthelasttrainingday beforetheexaminationcouldbearranged.

• OnlyonegroupfromPSOexperttrainingbatch2 couldfindcandidateplantstocarryoutthePSO assessment. Although pumping system is a typicalutilitysysteminplants,itisverydifficult toidentifyapumpingsystemwithsuitablemotor sizesandtheirusagetobecomeastudycase.As aresult,othercandidateshesitatedtoattendthe examination because theywould not be able to submittheassessmentreport.

• Theexpert trainingonPSObatch2wascarried out in2016and the examinationwasorganized in 2017. Some of the experts did not see the benefitofearningthecertificatesincetheproject wasapproachingitsfinalphase.

No.Number

ofTrainees

Number of Qualified

National ExpertsTraining

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

19

11

18

14

17

15

15

109

11

6

9

11

5

0

6

48

SSOexperttrainingbatch1

SSOexperttrainingbatch2

CASOexperttrainingbatch1

CASOexperttrainingbatch2

PSOexperttrainingbatch1

PSOexperttrainingbatch2

FSOexperttraining

Total

TheprojecttrainedatotalofsevennationaltrainersonEnMS,sixnationaltrainersonSSO,sixnationaltrainers onCASO, threenational trainers onPSO,andonenationaltraineronFSO.

Before being entitled as national trainers, theselected candidates had to prove themselves byco-teaching together with international expertsand deliver the training themselves under thesupervision of international experts. They wererequired to attend a train-the-trainer session, inwhich the international experts explained thebackground of the course design, materials usedforthetraining,andhowtocarryouttheworkshopsandexercisesessionsinthetraining.

The availability of national trainers provided theflexibilityoftheprojecttodelivertrainingsinotherregionsandremovedthelanguagebarriersincethetrainingcouldbeprovidedinThailanguage.

33


Based on the analysis, the key findings andobservationsareshownbelow.

• Six energy efficiency loan/credit programs are available in the market from 4 major banks, namelyKbank,BangkokBank,KTBandCIMB.

• Most of the banks do not usually consider financingofenergyefficiencyprojectsasproject finance. It is commonly considered as corporate finance, which increases the bank’s transaction cost and require more information from the projects’ owner.

• Most of the banks pay attention to the Ability to Repay Ratio especially DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio), which is calculated from a corporatecashflow,notaprojectcashflow.

• Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return(IRR),whicharefrequentlyusedtoevaluate the energy efficiency project at the plant level, are not used by banks as a direct consideration of repayment capacity.

• Fromthebanks’pointsofview, theobstruction of energy efficiency credit growth in Thailand liesonthedemandside,which implies that the project owners have less interest in investment comparedtothesupplyside,sincethebanksare ready to provide the energy credit for their current customers.

2.6Enhancing the Capacityof Financial Institutionsand Banks

Toenhancetheindustrialenergyefficiencyfinancing capacity, the project started with the study ofexisting project evaluation criteria used by themajorbanksinThailand,theassessmentoftrainingneeds for both bank’s personnel and factorypersonnel, and the design and development oftrainingcoursestosuittheirneeds.

2.6.1 Study ofExisting Project Evaluation Criteria

The study of existing project evaluation criteriaaimed to understand the bank’s perspectives andcriteria used to evaluate energy efficiency projectswhen factories submit their loan requests. DEDEandtheprojectagreedtohireaThaiconsultantfirmtostudythistopic.Thestudyprocess includedthereviewoflocalbank’scriteriaandpracticesusedinthe financial industry, and interview with the bank’s representatives. The representatives of 13relatedcommercialbanksandspecializedfinancialinstitutions were interviewed consisting of:

1 BankofAyudhaya(BAY)

2 CIMBThai(CIMB)

3 Export-ImportBankofThailand(EXIM)

4 GovernmentSavingBank(GSB)

5 IslamicBankofThailand(IBank)

6 KasikornBank(Kbank)

7 KrungThaiBank(KTB)

8 SiamCommercialBank(SCB)

9 SmallandMediumEnterpriseDevelopment BankofThailand(SMEBank)

10 ThaiInvestmentandSecuritiesCompany Limited(TISCO)

11 ThaiMilitaryBank(TMB)

12 ThanachatBank(Tbank)

13 UnitedOverseasBank(Thai)(UOB)

34


2.6.2 Training on FinancialEvaluation of Industrial EnergyEfficiency Project for Banks

The training on financial evaluation of industrialenergy efficiency project for banks was designedto familiarize the banks’ personnel to the basicindustrial utility systems and the common energyefficiency projects. The 2-day training consists ofin-classtrainingonday1andthevisittotheEnergyConservationBuildinginHonourofHisMajestytheKingforon-sitelearningonday2.Thetrainingforfinancial institutes were organized 2 times during26-27February2015and26-27March2015with34participants,13femaleand21male,from9banks.Theparticipatingbanksincluded:

1 Bangkok Bank

2 BankofAyudhaya

3 CIMBThai

4 EXIMBank

5 IslamicBankofThailand

6 SME Bank

7 TMB Bank

8 ThanachartBank

9 TISCOBank

Itwasfoundthatthebankshavetheirownprocessand criteria, which the project was unable tochange. Therefore, the consultant proposed keyrecommendations for reducing the credit processconstraintsasdescribedbelow.

1 Capacity building: Provide training courses designedonEEcharacteristics.Itmightpossible toincreasethebanks’potentialcapacitytocredit consideration by changing their perception fromCorporateFinancetoProjectFinance.

2 Credit product development: Provide EE credit with key features to motivate the owners to investmoreintensivelyinenergyprojects.

3 Overall credit consideration: Work with the banks to change their mindset to regard EE project loan requests as project finance,which takes less time in the credit consideration process. (The implementation of this direct recommendation is very difficult and depends onthebank’spolicy.)

4 Support from government organizations and energy network agencies:Cooperatewithenergy agencies and institutions to provide a capacity buildingprogram;providesoftloanforfinancial institutions similar to Energy Revolving Fund; provide the verification process of ESCO’s result; and request the cooperation to adjust thecreditriskreservemeasuresforEEprojects.

For the industry, the key recommendations forstrengtheningthepotentialtoaccessthecreditbythefactory’sownersaredescribedbelow.

1 Proposal preparation: Consider changing the outlinefromstrategicbusinessplantofeasibility studyoftheproject,whichwouldbepreferable tothebanksduetoshortandprecisecontent.

2 Financial projection preparation: Prepare financial projection proposals to the banks. Although the projection could be concise and pertinent, the preparation requires data from varioussources,whichcanaffectitscredibility.

3 Costbenefitevaluationoftheproject: Preparing feasibility study of the EE projects,whichwill enhancethereliability.

4 Support from government organizations and network: Arrange awareness raising activities fortheowners;andprovidebudgettemplatefor development of proposal preparation, financial projection and decision- making in equipment selection

35


2.7Closing the Loopwith Training for otherrelevant stakeholders

The original project design aimed at building thecapacity of the key players in energy efficiency,namely,enterprisemanagersandpersonnel,energyexperts and consultants and financial institutions.Additionally, equipment vendors and suppliers,as well as those providing support for technicalequipmentat the factory level,werealso includedasrelevantstakeholders.However,overthecourseof the project several further stakeholders weredeemedtoberelevant,namelythecertificationandaccreditationbodies (CB andAB) aswell asESCOcompanies. Therefore, the project developed twonew trainings for CBs and ABs, and incorporatedESCOsinthevendortraining.

TheEnMSimplementationhasbeenwidelyadoptedin Thailand, especially amongst large companies.However, theproject foundthat therewas limitedtechnicalknowledgeamongtheauditors.Therefore,the project carried out a two-day, technically-orientedCBtraining,(tobeprovidedtotheauditors),and one-day AB training to support TISI’s office.he breakdown of the participants of both the CBandABtrainingisshownbelow.

• 1st CB Training (19-20May 2014): A total of 39 participants attended, of which 17 were female and 22 male. 25 of the 39 participants were representatives of 12 CBs, and 14 participants wereTISI’sofficers.

• 2ndCBTraining(01-02September2015):Atotalof 37participantsattended,ofwhich13werefemale and 24 male. 32 of the 37 participants were representativesof14CBs,and5participantswere TISI’sofficers.

• AB training (03 September 2015): A total of 19 participants attended, of which 8 were female and11male.15ofthe19participantswereTISI’s officersand4participantswereDEDE’sofficers.

The original vendor training was designed as a½-dayoverviewofsystemsoptimization.Followingthe completion of the first SO vendor training,participants expressed interest for additional,technical-based training in SO. As a result, theprojectredesignedthevendortrainingtoa1½-daytraining using consisting of a curriculum thatincluded relevant aspects from both user- andexpert-level training materials. A two-hour brain-storming session was added to the second day’safternoon to facilitate discussions on the types ofsupporttheprojectcouldprovidesoastostimulateEEimplementationinThailand.Finally,inordertoengage more relevant market players, the projectexpanded to include both energy system designcompanies and ESCOs.

A total of 60 enterprises - consisting of vendors,suppliers, energy system design companies andESCOs–sentrepresentativestoattendthevendortraining (23forSSO,10forCASO,14forPSOand13forFSO).ThedetailedbreakdownofeachvendortrainingisshowninTable2.2.

36


Table 2.2 Breakdown of vendor training

Following the various training sessions conducted, the participants provided the following comments andsuggestions in their feedback:

• TheprojectshouldinvitethesteamsystemmanufacturerandthefuelsuppliertoattendtheSSO-related traininggiventhattheytooareinvolvedininfluencingtheenergyusageofsteamsystems;

• Thesuccessstoriesandcasestudiesshouldbedisseminatedacrosstheindustrialsectorforpromotional purposes;

• AdditionalSSATtrainingintheformofworkshopsshouldbeprovidedtoenhancetheparticipants’ understandingandconfidenceinusingthesoftware;

• Theadvanced-level,technically-orientedtrainingcourse,ratherthanthesimplifieduser-levelcourse, shouldbeprovidedtovendorsandsupplierssoastoincreasetheircapacityinandtechnical understandingofthesystemsapproach;

• Althoughtheinitialcostofequipmentislow,incomparisontothecostofenergyinthelongterm, itisfrequentlythemostimportantfactoraffectingthefactory’sdecisionwhenbuyingnewequipment. Therefore,thelife-cyclecostapproachshouldbepromotedtoindustryasamoreappropriatemethod forevaluatingdifferenttypesofequipment;

• Theenergyperspectiveofsystemsoptimization(particularlywithrespecttofan,pumpandcompressed airsystems)hasnotbeensufficientlyemphasizedintheacademicsphere.Instead,itshouldbepromoted tobothuniversitiesaswellasotherrelevantacademicinstitutions;and

• Incorrectmeasurementsledtounreliabledataandconsequently,resultedininaccurateanalyses. Qualifiedexpertsthatareabletoprovideguidanceortraininginappropriatemeasurementtechniques mightbebeneficial.

No.No. of

participants

No. of

companies Female MaleDate System

Gender

1

2

3

4

5

20

34

26

29

21

130

2

2

3

7

1

15

18

32

23

22

20

115

29Aug14

13-14Nov14

9-10Sep15

1-2Feb16

23-24Feb16

Total

SSO

SSO

CASO

PSO

FSO

10

18

10

14

13

37


2.8Communication Channels for Peer-to-Peer Network

Theprojecthassetupseveralcommunicationchannelstofacilitatetheaccessibilityofprojectinformationandexchangeofenergyefficiencyexperienceandlessonslearned.Bothparticipantsaswellasotherstakeholderssuch as factory personnel registered for the peer-to-peer network and are currently able to access suchinformation.Thecommunicationchannels for thepeer-to-peernetworkconsistedofe-mailcommunications,thebasecampprogram,theprojectwebsiteandaFacebookpage.

2.8.1 E-mail

E-mail communicationwasused as one of thekey channels to disseminate information to theparticipantsregarding, among others, details of up-coming trainings and workshops, the publication of promotionaland educational projectmaterial, and technical support for EnMS implementation and SO assessment. Allparticipantsofallworkshopsandtrainingsconductedbytheprojectwereregisteredintheproject’smailinglistwhichconsistedofmorethan900individuale-mailaddresses.

2.8.2 Basecamp

Basecampisanonlineprojectmanagementtoolaccessiblevia internetbrowserorthroughaspecificmobileapplication(showninFigure2.4).Thecandidatesoftheexperttrainingprogramswereinvitedtojointhegroupand to shareanddiscuss informationwithothers inanonline forum.The international expertsweremadeavailabletoanswerthequestionsraisedbytheparticipants.Intotal,therewere159memberswith10basecampprojectscreatedbrokendownasfollows:2fortheEnMSexperttraining,2fortheSSOexperttraining,2fortheCASOexpert training, 2 for thePSO expert training, 1 for theFSOexpert training, and 1 for theSSOtechnicaltrainingdevelopment.311discussionswereinitiatedand421fileswereshared.

Figure 2.4 Basecamp for IEE Project

38


2.8.3 Social media

To support remote access of the project’s infor-mation, thePMUcreatedaprojectwebsite (www.ieeproject.com shown in Figure 2.5). The websitecontained information pertaining to EnMS, SO,financial evaluation, training, publications, and ameans of contacting the website administrators.The training webpage was used to advertise up-comingtrainingsandprovidedthemostup-to-datetrainingagendaaswell as relevant applications indownloadable format directly from the website.With respect to thepublicationswebpage, variousmaterials, such as the SSAT application in Thai,a project leaflet and a case study were publishedandavailablefordownloadonly,however,forusersregistered to thewebsite. Additionally, video clipsofvariousspeakerswerepostedonthehomepageincluding a video containing factory personnelsharing their successful experiences with EnMSimplementationandan internationalexpertbrieflydiscussing various aspects of systems optimization. Intotal,morethan240memberswereregisteredtotheprojectwebsite.

By2015,giventhewidespreaduseofFacebook inThailand, the project created a Facebook accounttitled“IEEProjectThailand”soastosharetheshortinformation with factory personnel as well as thegeneralpublic.TheFacebookpagewasalsousedforannouncingup-comingtrainingactivitiesaswellasotherprojectevents.AsnapshotofFacebookpageisshowninFigure2.6.

In addition to the project’s formal communicationchannels,someparticipantsalsocreatedtheirownindividual networks with other participants usingother tools, such as group in Line Application forparticipants who attended the EnMS experttraining sessions.

Figure 2.6 IEE Project Thailand - Facebook Account

Figure 2.5 IEE Project website

2.9 Lessons Learned

The country context is very important especially for the technical knowledge transfer project like the IEEproject.SinceinThailand,theenergyefficiencyhasbeenpracticedandpromotedformorethantwodecades,the baseline situation and existing knowledge has to be considered and incorporated to the training ofemergingconceptspromotedintheprojectnamelyEnMSandSOtogether.TheadditionalvalueofEnMSandSOdifferent from theproject-based and component-based energy savingpractice is the keymessage to beemphasizedinallworkshopandtrainingcourses.

Thecontinuousimprovementisappliedintheproject.Thetraining’sfeedbackandupdatedindustry’ssituationwas analyzed to identify the improvement opportunities of the capacity building program. Therefore, newcoursesweredesignedtorespondtothenewtraining’sneeds.

39


Chapter 3

Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization

40

Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System and System Optimization

Along with capacity build-ing, the implementation of EnMS and SO is one of the project’s key elements. This chapter reports on the results of the EnMS implementation and SO as-sessment in the factories receiving technical support from the project. To mon-itor the impacts of the capacity building program, the project tracked both actual implementation of projects as well as the number of experts quali-fied by companies and the services they provide to industries for the factories participating in the train-ing program.

41

Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System

and System Optimization

Figure 3.1 Participated factories with EnMs in-placed and with ISO 50001 certification

ISO 50001(25 Fac)

EnMS(25 Fac)

50 factories have completedEnMS implementations.

25 factories have certified ISO 50001.25 Factories have EnMS in place.

UnderExpert Training

TLC

Implementation support program

The factories got the supports from three channels.

ISO 50001(9 Fac)

ISO 50001(8 Fac)

ISO 50001(8 Fac)

EnMS(7 Fac)

EnMS(6 Fac)

EnMS(12 Fac)

3.1 EnMS Implementation in Participating Factories

Atthebeginningoftheprojectin2012,onlyafewcompaniesinThailandimplementedtheEnMSfollowingtheISO50001standard.Therefore,theprojectonlyprovideddirectsupporttoatotalof50factoriestherebyenablingthemtoconformtoISO50001.Therewerethreeapproachestosupportthefactories,namely:

1 Support through EnMS Expert Training: Anumberoffactorieswereselectedtobehostfacilitiesfor theEnMStraining.StaffrepresentativesweresenttoattendtheEnMSExpertTrainingtogetherwithother expertcandidateswhohavepreviouslyworkedinthefieldsofstandardizationandenergymanagement. The candidates and the factory’s representatives worked together to implement EnMS under the internationalexperts’supervision.

2 Support through the TLC project funded by TISI: TheTLCprojectwasinitiatedbyTISItosupport theindustriesimplementingISOstandards,includingISO9001,ISO14001andISO50001.TheTLCproject wasopenedforallindustriesandnotjusttargetedsectorsaswasthecaseintheIEEproject.Theconsultants workingontheTLCprojectvarieddependingonthebiddingresults.TISIinvitedconsultantstoparticipate intheEnMSExperttrainingandtoreceivequalificationsasNationalExperts.TheIEEprojectthenworked withtheNationalExpertsoftheTLCprojecttosupportindustriesbyusingconsultantsthathavereceived the expert-level training course. Since 2012, 40 companies received support through the TLC project; however,only14companieswerecountedundertheIEEproject.

3 EnMS implementation support program under the IEE project: TheEnMSNationalExperts, alongwithsupportfromtheproject,providedtheon-siteassistancetotheparticipatingfactories.Before joining thissupportprogram, the factorieshadtodemonstrate intentandcommit to implementing the recommendedEnMSmeasuresaswellasset-upateamtosupporttheNationalExperts.Theinternational experts visited the participating factories and were made available for further guidance to the NationalExperts,asneeded.

Intotal,76factoriesreceivedsupportfromTISIandtheproject,however,only50werecountedtowardstheproject’scontribution,basedontherespectivetargetsectorsaswellascriteriasetoutbythenationalexperts.Ofthese50,19camefromthefoodandbeveragessector,1fromthetextilesector,1fromthepulpandpapersector,10fromtherubberandplasticsector,13fromthechemicalssector,4fromthebasicmetalssector,and2 from the non-metals sector; all 50 participating factories successfully implemented EnMS measures asrecommended.25outof50factorieshavealreadyreceivedcertification inISO50001fromthecertificationbody.ThedetailsofparticipatingfactoriesaresummarizedinFigure3.1.Thefulllistofparticipatingfactoriesis in SessionF.1ofAnnexF.

42


3.2System OptimizationAssessment

In Thailand, energy saving projects have beenpromoted by several government agencies formany years.Most of those projects emphasized acomponent-based assessment and awareness-raisingactivitiesinfactories.Therefore,toillustratethe differences between the component-basedapproach typically used in the market and thesystemapproachpromotedbytheIEEproject,theDIP and IEE projects provided direct technicalsupport to conduct system optimization assessmentsin the targeted factories. The implemented energyefficiencymeasuresresultingfromtheassessmentswere tracked, for the most part, with some out-standing cases still to be published as case studies. There were four approaches to support thefactories:

1 Support through SO Expert-Level Train- ing: Targetedfactorieswereselectedtobehost facilitiesforthetrainingcourses.TheSOexpert- level training course was attended by the factorystaffaswellasbyotherexpertcandidates with previous experience in energy efficiency assessment. After finishing the training, the candidates and the factories’ representatives will conduct an independent or group assessment of the candidate plant under the internationalexperts’supervision.

2 Support through the TEM project funded by DIP: TheTEMprojectwasinitiated byDIPtosupporttheindustriesimplementing energysavingmeasures.TheTEMprojectwas open to all industries, not just the sectors targetedundertheIEEproject.Theconsultants workingwiththeTEMprojectvarieddepending on the bidding results. Some of TEM’s consultants successfully became National Experts following completion of the expert training. Since 2012, 364 companies received support from the TEMproject, however, only 26 companies were counted towards IEE project’s contribution.

3 SO implementation support program under the IEE project: The National SO Experts along with support from the project provided the on-site assistance to the participating factories. Before joining the support program, the factories had to demonstrate intent and commit to implementing the recommended SO measures as well as set-up a team to support the National Experts. The international experts visited the participating factories and were made available for further guidance to the NationalExperts,asneeded.

4 Support through the Biomass Boiler Study Program: To complement the optimization of steam systems, the project conducted a study aimed at improving and maintaining the efficiency of biomass boilers andtheirsteamsystems.Asapartofthestudy, the National SSO Experts, with the support from the project, carried out the assessments of 9 factories containing biomass boiler operations to identify opportunities for improvement. In addition to the assessment reports, the results of the study have been complied to create guidelines for the improvementinabiomassboileroperations.

The systems optimization assessment under theproject consisted of the assessment of steam,compressedair,pumping,andfansystems.Althoughthese systems are quite common in the targetedsectors, the factories showed greater interest inassessing the steam and compressed air systemsas opposed to the pump and fan systems. Underthe project, 76 system optimization assessmentswere carried out: 47 SSO, 22 CASO, 4 PSO and 3FSOassessments.

The breakdown of the assessments carried outin the project is shown in Figure 3.2. The list ofparticipating factories conducting systemsoptimization assessments is in Session F.3 ofAnnexF.

43

Chapter 3Implementation of Energy Management System

and System Optimization

To identify the actual level of implementation of SO improvements proposed in the assessment reports,the project conducted a survey of all host facilities and candidate plants. The results showed that 74 SOimprovements were implemented. The list of implementedmeasures is shown in Session F.3 in Annex F.The total electricity saving is 13,862MWh/year, total fuel saving is 226,939 GJ/year. The calculated CO2reductionis21,897kgCO2/year.

Figure 3.2 System optimization assessment conducted through the project’s support

SSO47

SSO,18

SSO17

SSO12

CaSO22

CaSO,11

CaSO7

CaSO4

PSO4

PSO2

PSO2

FSO3

FSO3

In total, 76 systemoptimization assessments

carried out.

UnderExpert Training

TEM

Implementation support

44


3.3Implementation Impactsof EnMS Capacity Building

In addition to tracking results from the project’sdirect support activities with regards to theimplementation of operational improvements,the project also tracked results of enterprisesparticipating in the energymanagement trainings.The project conducted a survey by sending thequestionnaires to the participants of the two-dayEnMS user-level training, and following up bye-mailandphonecall.However,someparticipantsmoved to new organizations not the project’stargeted sectors. There were also some factories reported back that they have completed the energy management plan without stating the measures implemented.Consequently, the impacts of the training provided by the project can be grouped into two categories: the general impacts andthespecificimpactscountedforproject’starget.

Therefore, 200 factories successfully implementedthe EE improvements as stated in their EnergyManagement Plan. The list of factories and themeasures implemented is shown inSessionF.2 ofAnnexF.

3.4Implementation Impactsof SO Capacity Building

The project conducted a survey for SO imple-mentation by sending the questionnaires to theparticipants of the two-daySOuser-level training,and following up by e-mail and phone call. Thesimilar problems faced during the EnMP trackingwere found including of the organization’s changeof trained personnel. Some factories also replied back theirapplicationof trainingcontentswithoutidentifyingthemeasuresimplemented.115factorieshave returned the questionnaire; however, 39factories have partly reported their savings intheEnMPtracking.Aftereliminate the redundantmeasures,only105measuresfrom43factorieswerecounted for the impacts of SO capacity building.ThelistoffactoriesandthemeasuresimplementedisshowninSessionF.4ofAnnexF.

3.5Lessons Learned

The demonstration of implementing project is oneofthecriticalapproachestomobilizetheemergingconcepts like EnMS and SO. The implementationresultscanbepresentedascasestudiestoconvinceotherfactoriestoimplementtheEnMSandSO.

Thetrackingofproject’simpacttotheparticipatingfactoriesisdifficultandtimeconsuming.Thereareseveraluncontrolledfactorssuchastheresignationof personnel attending training, the change ofpositionwithnolongerinchargeofenergyrelatedproject,andthechangeoffactory’spolicy.Anotherissue is the timing of following-up. Since it takestime to implement the energyefficiencymeasuresespeciallywiththemediumtohighinvestment,thetooearlyfollowingupmaynotprovideanyresults,whilethetoolatefollowingupmayfacethehigherrisksofuncontrolledfactors.

45


Chapter 4

Project Sustainability

46

Chapter 4Project Sustainability

The sustainability of the project’s impact is one of the major focuses of the project. Some activities were included already in the design phase to ensure the sustainability beyondthe project’s duration, whereas other activitieswere initiated during theproject implementationphase. This chapter willdescribe the knowledgesharing approaches de-ployed consisting of the promotion of videos, case studies and fact sheets, self-learning platform, in-tegration into universities’ curriculum, and the training materials. The replication of EnMS and SO due to the project’s contribution will also be discussed in terms of sustainability enhancement.

47


4.1Knowledge Sharing

During the project implementation, knowledgehavebeengathered,managedandshared throughvarious channels such as workshops, trainings,event booths, leaflet, website and Facebook page.However, these activities would no longer beavailable after the project closure. Therefore, theproject has prepared several knowledge-sharingapproaches to continue reaching out to targetgroups and other potential players in the future.These approaches consisted of producingpromotion videos, preparing case studies and factsheets, creating e-learning platform for somecourses, integrating the EnMS and SSO into theuniversities’ curriculum, and making the trainingcoursesavailablefortheengineeringinstitutions.

4.1.1 Promotion Video

ThepromotionvideoaimedtoconveythemessagesfromthemanagementofDIPandTISIaswellasthemanagement of participating factories about theimportanceofenergyefficiencyinindustryandthesuccess stories from the implementation of EnMSand SO. The project achievements including thenumber of participating factories were presented toconvince other factories to implement EnMS andSO in their own factories. There are three sets ofvideosasdescribedbelow.

VideoNo.1Benefitsofenergyefficiencyandthe • project’sachievement • IntroductionbyDGofDIP • Project’s components •Benefitsofenergyefficiencyintheindustrial sectorandthecooperationbetweenDIPand theprojectbyDGofDIP •BenefitsofISO50001implementationand thecooperationbetweenTISIandtheproject bySGofTISI •Project’sachievements • Success story by Deputy Managing Director ofEasterPolypackCo.,Ltd. • Success story by Managing Director ofAeroflexCo.,Ltd. • Contact information

Video No. 2 Concept of EnMS and the success of participating companies •BriefintroductionoftheIEEproject •WhatisISO50001? • PDCA • 6 key concepts of Energy Management System • Key concept 1: Management commitment •Keyconcept2:Significantenergyuses(SEUs) • Key concept 3: Energy performance indicators (EnPIs) •Keyconcept4:Improvementopportunity •Keyconcept5:Operationalcontrol • Key concept 6: Management review • Success story by Managing Director ofAeroflexCo.,Ltd. • Success story by Deputy Managing Director ofEasterPolypackCo.,Ltd. • Contact information

Video No. 3 Concept of SO and the success ofparticipating companies •BriefintroductionoftheIEEproject •Whatissystemoptimization? • Steam system optimization • Pumping system optimization • Compressed air system optimization • Success story by Deputy Managing Director ofBangkokIronandSteelWorksCo.,Ltd. •SuccessstorybyFactoryDirectorof F&NDairies(Thailand)Co.,Ltd. • Contact information

Duringtheprojectimplementation,thesetofvideoswaspostedon theproject’swebsiteandFacebookpage, and shown before the start of the trainingsand workshops. The videos can be used beyondthe project closure since most of the contentemphasizes the promotion of energy efficiency intheindustryandtheillustrationoftheconceptsofEnMSandSO.UNIDO can also use the videos inotherenergy-relatedGEFprojects.Thevideocouldbe given to the project’s partners and UNIDO’sRegionalOfficeinBangkokfortheirusage.

48


4.1.2 Disseminating Case Studies and Fact Sheets

One of the effectiveways to convince factories to implement energy efficiencymeasures is to show themthe evidence of successful implementation. Therefore, the project prepared 25 case studies on EnMS andSO implementation. Each case study illustrated the benefits of implementing either EnMS or SO, theirimplementationapproach,keysuccessfactors,andsavingsfromtheimplementation.Thelistofcasestudiesisshown inTable4.1. Inadditionto the improvementopportunities,whicharethecommonfocusarea, thespecialfocusedareasofeachcasearelistedinthetable.TheexamplesofcasestudiesareinFigure4.1 andthecopiesofeachcasestudycanbefoundinAnnexG.

Table 4.1 List of case studies

No. Factory Focused AreaSector Topic

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

CharoenPokphandFoods

SahaviriyaPlateMill

C.P. Rice

Aeroflex

EasternPolypack

Cerebos

Tong Siang

ThaiMMA

Kulwong

Innolatex

FuengFuAnant

BeerThip

ImprovementofEnPIsBenefitsImprovementmeasures

OperationalcontrolLessonslearned

Energy performance improvementPower of data

HowtoidentifySEUsP-D-C-AcycleChallenges

RegressionAnalysisTrainingBenefits

BenefitsObjectives,targets,actionplanMetricsOvercoming barriers

HumanangleofthesystemSEUsLifecyclecost

Management systemBarrierBenefit

SMEsData issues

KeepitsimpleAwareness raising programBenefits

Staff engagementEnergy awarenessInternalauditOpportunities for improvement

HowtoidentifySEUsP-D-C-AcycleOtherbenefits

Food

Basicmetal

Food

Rubber

Plastic

Food

Textiles

Chemical

Chemical

Rubber

Beverage

Beverage

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

EnMS

49


In addition to case studies, the project has prepared fact sheets about EnMS, SO and biomass boilerimprovement to provide a brief overview and information on those areas including their implementationbenefits.ThelistoffactsheetsisshowninTable4.2andthefactsheet’sdetailsareinAnnexG.

Table 4.2 List of fact sheet

No.

No.

Factory

Factsheet

Focused Area

Focused Area

Sector Topic

Topic

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1

2

CharoenPokphandFoods

Aeroflex

EasternPolypack

UenoFineChemicalsIndustry

F&NDairies

Tong Siang

BangkokLab&Cosmetic

ThaiNipponRubberIndustry

FuengFuAnant

LeeFeedMill

ThaiUnionFrozenProducts

ChanCharoen

ApexPlastech

WhywouldyouimplementanEnMS?

Guidelinesforbiomassboiler’sefficiencyimprovement measures

CentralizedcompressedairsystemAutomaticcontrolinstallation

Insulationoffurnace

Compressedairleakage

Installationofnewboiler

Flashsteamrecovery

Fuelswitching

LEDreplacement

Energysourceswitching

Blowdownreduction

ExcessairreductionCombustionchambercleaning

Economizerinstallation

Pipeinsulation

Highefficiencyaircompressorreplacement

BenefitofEnMsimplementationSixkeyconcepts

FundamentalofcombustionBiomasstypesandcharacteristicsBoilerefficiencycalculationExampleofimprovementmeasures

Food

Rubber

Plastic

Food

Food

Textiles

Chemical

Rubber

Beverage

Food

Food

Plastic

Plastic

CASO

EnMS

CASO

SSO

SSO

SSO

EnMS

EnMS

SSO

SSO

SSO

SSO

CaSO

EnMS

SSO

50


4.1.3 Increasing the Accessibilityof Training by Using E-learning

Although the project cannot provide any in-classtrainingbeyond itsduration,factorypersonnelcankeep learning about energy management systemandfinancialevaluationofenergyefficiencyprojectby accessing the self-learning course. These self-learning courses are available in bothEnglish andThai. The explanation of each course is shownbelow.

Energy ManagementSystem Self-Learning Course

The objective of the EnMS self-learning course isto provide a step-by-step guidance to the factory personnelonhowtoestablishtheeffectiveenergy managementsystem.Thelengthofcourseisabout10 to 12 hours depended on the learner’s speed.Therearefivemodulesinthecourse;namelyintro-duction,plan,do,checkandact.Tobepractical,duringthe studying, the factory personnel can click thelinktotheEnMPtrackingprogramtorecordtheiractual activities such as announcement of energypolicyandassignmentofenergymanagementteam.

Financial Evaluation of EnergyEfficiency Project Self-Learning Course

There are two sessions in the financial evaluationof energy efficiency project self-learning course,one for industry and one for financial institutions.The course for industrywas designed towalk thefactory personnel through the basic financialanalysis, and also provide an overview of banks’creditunderwritingprocessand thebanks’projectproposal content requirements. For the course forfinancial institute, it was designed to provide thebasic information of industrial energy system andcommonutilities,theconceptoflifecyclecost,andtheenergysavingmeasurementandverification.

The self-learning courses can be accessed throughthe self-learning platform as shown in Figure 4.2.Thelearnercanselectbetweenthe“trainingcoursefor industrial sector” and the “training course forfinancialinstitutions”.

Therearesixchaptersfortheindustrialsector’strainingcourseandfivechaptersforthefinancialinstitution’strainingcourse.ThedetailsoftrainingcoursesareinSessionH.2ofAnnexH.

Theaudiencecanalsodownloadthefullguidelineinpdfandconnecttothereferencesourcesandrelevantwebsitesbyfollowingthelinkprovidedinthecomputerprogram.

Figure 4.2 Home screen of the financial evaluation of energy efficiency project self-learning course

51


4.1.4 Integrating EnMS and SSO into Universities’ Curriculum

Oneof thekeyqueries fromthemidtermreview ishowtosustain theknowledge-sharingafter theproject closure.TheprojectpartnersandUNIDOagreedthatintegratingEnMSandSOintouniversities’curriculumis oneoftheapproaches,whichisdoablewiththeexistingresources.Byconsideringthetimeandbudgetavailable, the project decided to prepare thematerial package for theEnMS and SSO course. To develop the course materials,theprojectfollowedtheprocessshowninFigure4.4,whichincludesfocusgroupmeeting,reviewof existingmaterials,questionnairesurvey,preparationofdraftmaterials, reviewby lecturers,andpreparation offinalmaterials.

4.1.5 Making the Training Courses Available to the Institutes

Inadditiontotheself-learningmaterialsanduniversitycourse,theprojectismakingthe2-dayusertrainingcourseavailableforthefactorypersonnelwhowanttolearnaboutEnMSandsystemoptimization.Therefore,theprojecthas revised theThaiversionof the2-dayuser trainingand theuserguidelinesandmade themavailabletotheinstitutes.However,aspartofqualityassurancepolicy,theinstituteshavetosendaformalrequesttoUNIDOforthepermissiontoarrangethetrainingcourses,whichcanonlybedeliveredbyUNIDO’snationaltrainers.

DetailonEnMSandSOcoursedesignisinAnnexH

DetailonSOcoursematerialsisinSessionI.2ofAnnexI.

EnMS Course Materials

Sincethecourseisdesignedforthe3rd and 4th yearundergraduatestudent,itassumesthatthestudenthasabackgroundontheenergy-relatedterminologyandbasic calculation skills. The studentmayhaveno direct experience in utility and productionprocesses, but should have some basic under-standingoftheseprocesses.DetailonEnMScoursematerialsisinSessionI.1ofAnnexI.

Thematerialpackagecontainsthefollowingitems: • InstructionofusingEnMScoursematerial •Syllabus •Presentationfor11weeks(inpptandinpdf) •Casestudypapermillanddatafileinexcel •Casestudykaolinplantanddatafileinexcel •Workshopsandassignment •25casestudiesfromIEEproject •EnMSinbriefflyer

Figure 4.4 Course material development process

SSO Course Materials

Theprojecthasreviewedandanalyzedthetrainingmaterials for theSSOuser training,SSO technicaltraining and SSO expert training. Based on thereview,theavailabletrainingmaterialsshouldcoverallaspectsofSSO.However,additionalcontentonthe system should be added to guide the non-experiencedstudents.

Thematerialpackagecontainsthefollowingitems: • InstructionofusingSSOcoursematerial •Syllabus •Presentationfor11weeks(inpptandinpdf) • Case study •Workshopsandassignment •SSSTexcelfile(inThai)

Focusgroup

meeting

Preparedraft course

materials

Reviewexisting

materials

Reviewby

lecturers

Questionnairesurvey

Preparecourse

materials(final)

52


4.2Project’s Contributionto Replication

Thenationalexpertswhoweretrainedandcertifiedintheprojectwillbeanimportantresourcefortheknowledgedissemination and replicationofEnMSand SO implementation. Most of the nationalexperts are the consultants in the field of energyaudit and ISO 14001. A few of them are factorypersonnel. According to the survey, about 35national experts have provided the trainings onEnMSand/orSOaftercertifiedasnationalexpert.It shouldbenoted that the factorypersonnelwhoare the national experts have actively transferredthe EnMS knowledge by providing almost 60internal trainings. They also supported the EnMSimplementation in their corporate, which resultedof 15 additional factories certified ISO 50001 andfourfactorieswithEnMSinplace.

Duringthesurveyofcontributiontoreplication,thePMUaskedforthelistoffactoriesthatthenationalexperts supported the EnMS/SO implementation.Based on the compiled list, the national expertsprovided the consultancy service or support to40factoriesforEnMSimplementation,52factoriesforSSOassessment,20factoriesforCaSOassessmentand two factories forPSOassessmentwithout theproject’s support.

Thesurveyresultsshowedthatthecertainnumberof national expertswere capable to deliver EnMSandSOtrainings,whichisimportantforknowledgedisseminationaftertheprojecttermination.

4.3Market Transformfor EnMS and SO

Atthebeginningoftheproject,EnMSin-linewithISO50001 standardwasanemerging concept forThailand. There was only one factory in ThailandwithISO50001certificationin2012.In2016,therewere 255 certificates of ISO 50001 in Thailandaccording to the survey conducted by ISO. TheprojecttogetherwithTISIandDEDE,IEEproject’spartners, have promoted the ISO 50001 imple-mentationforseveralyears.AlthoughtheISO50001is currentlywellknown toThai industry,TISIandDEDEwill continue their activities to support thefactoriestostandardizetheirEnMSimplementationtomeettheISO50001.

The74SOassessmentindependentlycarriedoutbythe national expertswithout the financial supportfrom the project reflected the adoption of SOconcept by the national experts. The backgroundof national experts is mixed. Most of them areconsultants,whilesomeofthemarelecturerswhoalsoprovide theconsultingservice.Manyof themarestillactive.Theykeepprovidingtheconsultingservices either directly to the industry or throughthe technical support projects funded by Thaigovernment.

The national expertswhowork in the universitieshave already incorporated the EnMS and SO intheir class. They help the project to cultivate theprinciplesofEnMSandSOtothestudentswhowillbe theengineerworking in the industryorbe theconsultantsupportingtheindustryinthefuture.

53


Chapter 5

Project Monitoring

54

Chapter 5Project Monitoring

In addition to the regular monitoring by the Project Steering Committee, the project was also evaluatedby the independent evalua-tors according to the GEF’s requirements. In this chapter, the result of midterm evaluation is presented.

55


5.1Mid-term Evaluation

A mid-term evaluation was undertaken on-sitebetween11and16May2015,namely3yearsand2 months into the project. The internationalevaluator, Mr. Johannes Van den Akker and thenationalevaluator,Ms.ThareeKamuang,interviewedtheproject’skeypartnersandvisitedtwofactoriesparticipatingintheproject.

Theevaluatorsfoundthattheprogressmadeontheproject’soutputswassignificant,withmostplannedoutputsbeingachievedbythetimeofthemid-termreviewor on track to be completed by the end of2015.The industriesshowedstrong interest in theproject,particularlythelargerindustrialcompanies.Thedirectly relevant feedback from theevaluatorsandtheactionstakenbytheprojectaredescribedinthefollowingsections.

5.1.1 Institutionalization of training

Feedback from the review

OneaspectofsustainabilityistheinstitutionalizationoftheEnMSandSOtrainingcourses.Thetrainingsthemselves contain a wealth of information andall training materials and documents shouldbe transferred to DEDE’s Energy Training andLearningCenterwhich could simultaneously serveas a focal point for e-learning on EnMS- and SO-relatedissues.ThisissuewouldneedtobediscussedandagreeduponbytheProjectSteeringCommitteebeforeexecution.

In a country the size of Thailand and a marketconsisting of tens of thousands of small, mediumand large enterprises, the number of trainednational experts envisaged (about 80) and thenumberofcompaniestargeted(about200inEnMSand 50 in SO) is comparably small. Even if theproject could be up-scaled, it would only coverof small section of the vast number of companiesin the country.We suggest diverting someprojectresourcestothefollowing:a)integratingtheEnMSandSOinthecurriculumofrelevantundergraduateprograms of prominent universities and/or b)organizingshortintroductionandrefreshercoursesor seminars at relevant engineering or businesstraining institutes, or by relevant industry andprofessionalassociations.

Theformeroptionisenvisagedmoreforthemedium-term, while the latter option could probably beimplementedintheshortterm.Pilotingboththeseprogramsduring theproject’sdurationwouldbeadesirable(new)output.Itwassuggestedduringtheevaluationmission that recognition in the form ofanofficialUNIDOcertificatetothetrainednationalexpertsfortheirworkdoneincompanieswouldbeusefulfortheirprofessionalworkinthefuture.

Actions taken

Although the feedback from the evaluators wasuseful in termsof sustaining thecapacitybuildingprogram,theexistingsituationinThailandaswellasthelimitationsoftheprojectneedtobeaddressed.Currently, there aremany organizations (includinggovernment agencies, engineering institutes,certification bodies and consulting companies)providing the energy-related trainings to industry.These organizations have their own trainingmaterialsandtrainers.Inordertousetheproject’straining materials, the national trainers must bethe ones to deliver the training, thereby ensuringguaranteed quality. Consequently, it is difficultto force these organizations to adopt the UNIDOcourse and trainers. However, the project realizedthe usefulness of disseminating the knowledgegathered during the implementation phase. Theproject then decided to make the two-day user-leveltrainingpackageavailableforthegovernmentagenciesandengineeringinstitutes.However,theseorganizations have to submit a formal requestto UNIDO addressed to the HQ office in Vienna.Nevertheless,thetrainersmustbepartofthepoolofnational trainersorat leastbeapprovedby thenationaltrainersandUNIDO.

In the last year of the implementation phase, theproject developed two courses for undergraduatestudents and made course materials available forlecturerstousetheintheirclassrooms.Thedetailsrelating to thedevelopment of the course are laidout in section 4.1.4.

56


5.1.2 Post-project action plan


Towards the end of the project, the PMU willcommission a sound analysis of the situation,remainingbarriersandstepstobetakenthatensurethe policy-institutional, technical and financial-conomic sustainability of theProject in theperiodaftertheprojecthascometoanend.

The project document foresees the transfer of themaintenance of the peer-to-peer database andreportingtoolstotherelevantgovernmentagency.Thus, the institutionalization of the P2P networkshould be looked into, as well as the post-projectrole of existing industrial associations, chambersof commerce and industry and professional associations of engineers. The formation of aWorkingGroup (with representatives ofDIP, TISI, DIWandDEDE) isanimportantfirststeptowardsa post-project cooperation between these govern-ment entities. The post-project action plan shouldprovide some details on objectives, plans andactionstobetakenbytheWorkingGroup.

For example, the Working Group can play animportantroleinmakinginformationandknowledgeonSOandEnMSavailable throughvariousmeansincluding toolkits on CDs and in printed form aswell as web-based tools and info made availablethroughe-learningportal.Theequipmentprocuredunder the project and used during the audits andmeasurementsmustalsobedisposedofappropriately;itwassuggested to theevaluators that itcouldbeusedbytheDIPforfutureassistancetoSMEs.

These issuesshouldbeaddressed towards theendof the project by commissioning a sound ‘post-project action plan’. Such an ‘action plan’ shouldhave the following elements: a) overview chapteronstatusofEnMS,SOandEE,b)identificationofmitigated and outstanding barriers, c) conclusionand recommendations to the Government andprivate sector institutions for post-project suppor-tive actions.

Actions taken

Aftertheproject’scompletion,theinformationandknowledge on SO and EnMS was made availablethroughtheprojectwebsite,whichwillbeavailableforanother2years,aswellasinotherGEFprojectsin Thailand executed byUNIDO. TheCDs on self-learning were given to the project’s partners fordissemination.

Theequipmentusedduring theenergyaudits andmeasurements were transferred to DIP, DIW andDEDEforfutureusetosupportThaiindustry.

5.1.3 Finance


Itisnotexactlycleartowhatextentthereexistsaneed for external financing of industrial energyefficiencyimprovements(resultingfromEnMSandSOanalyses)evenregardinglargerinvestmentswitha largeenergyefficiency improvementcomponent. In this respect, SMIs could possibly be in more needoffinancetoundertakeEEimprovements.Itisrecommendedthatsurveysconductedamongstthetargeted (and potential) industries should includequestions on the financing needs and supportrequired. This information should feed into theabove-mentioned post-project action plan with a section on financing issues (if any) and options.Inthisrespect,itwouldbeusefultoaskquestionsto the company regarding fuel, power and corres-ponding monetary savings, as well as estimatedinvestment cost. This provides useful insightsregardingpaybackperiods aswell as theneed foradditionalfinancingtofundinvestments.

Actions taken

Theprojecthas incorporatedquestions targetedatthe financing needs of factories when organizingworkshops.However, limited information is sharedregarding the financing sources and the cost ofinvestment in EE improvements. Nevertheless, itis quite obvious that many factories are targetingDEDE’sfinancialsupportprogram.

5.1.4 Gender


Tomakethegenderdimensioninthevariousprojectactivities more pronounced, gender-disaggregatedindicators could be included in future companysurveys to be able to measure the contributionsoftheprojecttowardsgendermainstreaming.

Actions taken

Theprojecthas included thegenderdisaggregatedindicators in the survey of energy managementplanimplementation.

cover inside

2

Annex AProject Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting

content

3


Annex A

Project Management Structure and Minutes of Meeting

4


A.1 Project Management Structure

The implementation of all activities planned under the project will be supervised by DIP through the Project Steering Committee (PSC) as shown in Table a.1.

Table a.1 List of PSC’s members

Title Organization Role in PSC

Director General Department of Industrial Promotion Chairperson

Deputy Director General Department of Industrial Promotion Vice Chair no. 1

Deputy Secretary General Thai Industrial Standards Institute Vice Chair no. 2

Director of Division II of Sectorial Industries Development

Department of Industrial Promotion Member

Director of Safety Technology Bureau Department of Industrial Works Member

Representative Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Member

Representative SME Development Bank Member

Representative CIMB Thai Member

Representative The Federation of Thai Industries Member

Representative Office of Industrial Economics Member

Project Manager UNIDO Member

National Project Coordinator UNIDO Secretary and Member

Since the PSC’s meeting was organized once a year, the PSC agreed to set up a Working Group (according to the decision made at the PSC meeting on 19 February 2014), which would be represented by the focal points of each government partners, to facilitate the management of the project and work closely with PMU as assigned by the PSC. The Working Group Members are listed in Table a.2.

Table a.2 List of Working Group members

Title Organization Role in WG

Director of Division II of Sectorial Industries Development

Department of Industrial Promotion Chairperson

Representative Thai Industrial Standards Institute Vice Chair

Representative Department of Industrial Works Member

Representative Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Member

Representative Department of Industrial Promotion Secretary and Member

National Project Coordinator UNIDO Secretary and Member

5


A.2 Key Decisions made by Project Steering Committee

Table a.3 Key decisions made by Project Steering Committee

PSC Meeting Key Decisions Actions

1st PSC meeting27 March 2012

The project would organize the inception workshop in June 2012.

Inception workshop was organized on 6 June 2012.

The project would invite the Minister of Industry to give the welcome speech in the inception workshop.

Minister of Industry gave the welcome speech in the inception workshop.

NPC would later send the project document with details on the amount of co-financing contribution committed by each project partner.

Documents circulated

Deputy Secretary General of TISI, Mr. Virat, was nominated for Vice Chair of PSC by the committee.

The structure of PSC has been revised.

The committee unanimously approved The Federation of Thai Industries (F.T.I.) and industry Office of Industrial Economics to be additional committee.

The structure of PSC has been revised.

The work operation should be as follows. PMU would be the center of coordinator and TISI would be the leader of for ISO implementation. DEDE would be the leader in financing capacity. DIP and DIW would be responsible for SO implementation. The leader of each component would assign focal point and contact person for UNIDO in order to coordinate with each component.

Focal point of each agency has been assigned.

2nd PSC meeting14 May 2013

The PSC unanimously approved to add pulp and paper to be IEE project target industries.

PMU has added the pulp and pa-per in the target sector list.

3rd PSC meeting19 February 2014

The PSC has agreed to set up the working group to coordinate among the project’s partners.

DG of DIP as a chairperson of PSC has signed the order to set up the working group.

4th PSC meeting24 February 2015

The PSC approved that the working group would invite the committee to attend the midterm evaluation result presentation and then circulated draft result within the committee.

The midterm evaluation has been conducted during 12 to 15 May 2015. The evaluator presented the initial findings to the PSC on 15 May 2015. The draft and final version of evaluation report was circulated.

5th PSC meeting17 January 2017

The PSC unanimously approved to extend the project closing date to 28 February 2018.

The extension letter to UNIDO has been signed by the DG of DIP and sent to UNIDO on 8 May 2017.

The PSC approved to organize Case Study Awards and working group would discuss in details about the awards criteria.

The case study award competition has been carried out during 7 February to 10 April 2017.

The PSC approved to coordinate with representative from project partners on equipment transfer and allocation.

The project partners has agreed on the equipment allocation list.

6


A.3 Project Steering Committee Meeting 1/2012

Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Venue: Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power

Presiding: Mr. Pasu Loharjun Director General Department of Industrial PromotionMembers Present: Mr. Virat Aja-Apisit Deputy Secretary-General Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mrs. Sirinthorn Vongsoasup Energy Efficiency Expert Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Mr. Prasong Norajit Director of Safety Technology Bureau Department of Industrial

Mrs. Rachada Rukpongpibul First Vice President Commercial Banking Financial Analytics and Support Team, CIMB Thai

Mr. Tanit Onnuch Vice President Commercial Banking Service and Support Section CIMB Thai

Mr. Pornchai Jirasopon SME Bank

Mr. Chin-Pen Chua Representative and Director UNIDO Regional Office

Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha Project Manager, UNIDO (IEE Project)

Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai National Project Coordinator, UNIDO (IEE Project)

Observers Present: Mr. Vuttichai Tangam Director of Bureau of Target Industries Development Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Samakki Pocharoen Director of Energy and Environmental Development Division Department of Industrial Promotion

Mrs. Wilaiporn Champrasit Senior Industrial Technical Officer Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Aditad Vasinonta Industrial Technical Officer Department of Industrial Promotion

7


Observers Present: Mrs. Sompit Naennar Public Sector Development Officer Department of Industrial Promotion

Miss Angsana Somabha Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Noppadol Janya-Adisai Dissemination Technical Officer Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Standard Officer Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mrs. Ampornpan Wongtharua Office of Industrial Economics

Mr. Sarun Panyatham Manager Commercial Banking Service and Support Section CIMB Thai

Mr. Chanin Nidhiprabha SME Bank

Mrs. Sooksiri Chamsuk Programme Officer UNIDO Regional Office

Miss Kulsiri Sakprasith Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Miss Atchareeya Pongput Project Administrative Assistant UNIDO (IEE Project)

Absent: Mr. Supakit Boonsri Department of Industrial Works Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Pasu Loharjun, Chairperson, at 9:30 a.m.

8


Session 1 Committee’s Report:

Mr. Pasu, Chairperson, reported to the meeting that on March 6, 2012 the Council of Ministers unanimously approved the joint project between Ministry of Industry, Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency of Ministry of Energy and UNIDO under the coordination of Department of Industrial Promotion to implement the Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE). He also informed that there were several comments from Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board that the project should concern the involvement of SMEs, and clearly specify indicators, results and effects in terms of quantity and quality. The monitoring and evaluation should also proceed continuously.

Session 2 Information:

Mr. Sanjaya, Project Manager, introduced the overview and concept of the Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE). He started with the history of the project, the barriers to industrial energy efficiency, the project objective and financial plan. The detailed document was attached in Appendix 1.

Ms. Uma, National Project Coordinator, then described the IEE project work plan, project activities, project management and implementation in 2012. The project objectives were to promote industrial energy efficiency through ISO 50001 energy management standards and system optimization. The project activities were divided into 4 components consisting of 1) ISO Compliant Management Systems, 2) Industrial Energy Systems Optimization, 3) Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity, and 4) Implementation of Energy Management and Systems Optimization Projects. Please find details enclosed in Appendix 2.

Session 3 Consideration Issues:

Session 3.1 Discussion of project activities, work plan and budgeting

Ms. Sirinthorn offered the training venue of Bureau of Human Resource Development of DEDE, which is located in Klong Ha area, for Energy Systems Optimization training. Mr. Sanjaya confirmed that the project would share the training documents to all project partners and the committee could give some comments before it would be translated.

Mr. Virat submitted a question why there was no working group chart in the presentation and how the working structure of the project would be. He also inquired if the projects had drawn any working structure. Ms. Uma responded that the current management chart was approved by GEF and initially there was no working group in the working structure, but after meeting with the related organizations, there was an idea of establishing working groups to coordinate with project management unit. Ms. Sirinthorn commented that it was necessary to have working group for each activity because the PMU would focus on overall activity and the PSC would be too large to proceed the activities.

Ms. Rachada questioned whether the timeline for management workshop in August 2012 would be too late to organize other activities or not. Ms. Uma explained that the management workshop would be held after the inception workshop, which would be organized in June, and the project had to wait for confirmation from international experts. However, the project would consider the date for management workshop again. Mr. Pasu submitted the question why the inception workshop would be held in June. Ms. Uma replied that there were many holidays during April and May therefore in order to avoid the delay in sending out the invitation letters to the factories and managing the workshop venue during the holidays, the workshop initially was planned to be held in June.

Mr. Prasong commented that the project had to demonstrate the clear goal and the expected outcome of the project. He also expressed that he was not sure if four selected systems for system optimization would be enough for basic metal industry, especially for SMEs smelting factories which normally did not have boiler, pumping, and fan systems. He shared his experience from the project with small aluminum and steel smelting factories that if the project had not focused on the furnace system, it would not have been possible to receive the clear result on energy saving. He also was concerned that whether ESO national experts had to sign an agreement

9


after receiving the training and how to recruit the candidate that can work for the project with long term. Mr. Pasu asked if there is any possibility to show outcome of the project. Mr. Sanjaya agreed that the system optimization might not be a measure for basic metal industry but for some of metal industry such as steel industry, he believed that there was an opportunity to improve pumping system. He mentioned that it was not necessary to improve every system in every industry. The project could select the available industry. He also explained that improving in furnace design or typical component level is not in the scope of the project. Regarding the training, he thought that it might be one month before or after August as it was summer time in Europe therefore it was difficult to find an expert to work in summer. Therefore he recommended not to fix the date yet. Ms. Uma confirmed to send the project documents which stated the output and outcome of the project to the committee. She also emphasized that it was necessary to have the agreement with the national experts. She mentioned that if the PSC could recommend the potential consultants so that they could maintain the long-term relationship with the government agency after the project terminated. Mr. Prasong shared his experience from the previous project which had also debate on whether or not to issue the certificate for the successful trainees. However, in that project the committee decides not to issue the certificate.

Mr. Vutthichai mentioned that Department of Industrial Promotion also had Total Energy Management Project (TEM) which was similar to IEE. That project had a clear goal to annually reduce 5% energy but practically it could reduce upto 5-10%. He suggested that IEE had to set the clear objective and make the project different from TEM. He also expressed that he was not worried about consultant training because he had been informed from the consultant firms that the professional energy experts were still in demand. Mr. Sanjaya explained that IEE also targeted on the improvement of factories supported by TEM to save more energy. He explained that IEE had the different system from energy management in Thailand. Ms. Sooksiri clarified that both project had the same goal and objective. However, she ensured that IEE would work closely with TEM and if the factories supported by TEM applied the use of ESO then it would be more helpful to save more energy.

Ms. Sirinthorn suggested that the objective of the ESO implementation was to improve the energy saving in the common operating system so that the project could magnify the project outcomes to other unselected industrial sectors. However, since the project had selected four operating systems in six industrial sectors, but each industrial sector had specific machines and equipments. The project should also provide some recommendation or guideline on those specific machines; therefore the factories would be able to improve the system beside those four selected systems. Mr. Sanjaya answered that those industrial sectors were selected based on the survey results. If some industries would be interested in joining the project then the project could make the decision later and the project might use the same training material to support them.

Ms. Angsana asked whether the national experts and the factories could participate both ISO and ESO components. Ms. Uma answered that the factories can join both components but the national experts could not involve in both components because the project had planned to train 50 experts for each component. Also, the selection criteria of these two groups of expert were different. The experts on ESO would require the technical background while the experts on ISO Management System would require more general management knowledge.

Ms. Uma asked for the advice for the pattern of activity in inception workshop, the protocol and who the speaker would be. Mr. Sanjaya shared some experience in inception workshop in Philippines and Vietnam that it had been held to promote the project. They had invited Secretary, who is the Minister in Thai system, or Deputy Secretary to be the speaker. Ms. Sirinthorn suggested that the speaker should be Minister of Industry or Permanent Secretary of Minister of Industry. She also recommended that beside six selected industries, the project should invite other potential industries, SMEs, other government agencies that could support the project, energy consultants and the universities that could promote the knowledge from the project. Mr. Pasu said that it was possible that Minister of Industry would be the speaker otherwise Permanent Secretary of Minister of Industry would be assigned by the Minister. Ms. Uma would find the workshop venue and propose to the PSC later.

Ms. Uma also confirmed to send the project document with details on the amount of co-financing contribution committed by each project partner.

Ms. Sirinthorn said that DEDE was pleased to promote the project and offered that if the customer needed to invest in the replacement, then DEDE could support.

10


Decision

3.1.1 The project would organize the inception workshop in June 2012.

3.1.2 The project would invite the Minister of Industry to give the welcome speech in the inception workshop. However, if the Minister would not be available, normally he would assign the Permanent Secretary of Minister of Industry to present on behalf of the Minister. The choice of workshop venue would be proposed to the PSC later.

3.1.3 Ms. Uma would later send the project document with details on the amount of co-financing contribution committed by each project partner.

Session 3.2: Discussion of project structure

Mr. Pasu recommended Mr. Virat to be Vice Chair of PSC. Mr. Sanjaya shared the experience that in other countries the additional members of PSC were from academic or universities to discuss particular issue. Those were not full time members of the committee on an ad hoc basis but they would receive some benefits from this involvement. The full time members could be from industry association but if they would not attend the activities strongly, those members could likely to fail as the members because the committee needed to encourage the association to involve in the PSC. However, the committee could decide which association would be invited.

Mr. Pasu recommended that the project should invite the organization in industrial field that could coordinate the project to be additional committee, for example, The Federal of Thai Industries (F.T.I) and Office of Industrial Economics. Mr. Chua proposed Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion (OSMEP) but Mr. Pasu commented that now the Ministry tried to adjust the role of OSMEP to focus on the policy for SMEs so it was not related to the project directly.

Ms. Uma explained that there were 3 working components which consisted of ISO, ESO and Financing capacity. The leader of each component could set the working group and coordinated PMU then PMU would report to PSC with the conference proceedings. Ms. Sirinthorn inquired whether UNIDO could be the center of PMU and DEDE would support and coordinate in each activities and Mr. Pasu suggested that UNIDO would be the administrative support. Mr. Sanjaya proposed that each department could send the relevant expert to work within PMU. Once the project terminated, those people could continue provide support to the department. Ms. Uma clarified that the idea of establishing working group was to motivate other organizations that were not the core partner of the project to join the activities. However, the working group could be formal or informal. Mr. Virat also suggested forming the informal working group.

Decision

3.2.1 Mr. Virat was nominated for Vice Chair of PSC by the committee.

3.2.2 The committee unanimously approved F.T.I and industry Office of Industrial Economics to be additional committee.

3.2.3 The committee had come together to form the informal working group. PMU would be the center of coordinator and TISI would be the leader of for ISO implementation. DEDE would be the leader in financing capacity. DIP and DIW would be responsible for ESO implementation. The leader of each component would assign focal point and contact person for UNIDO in order to coordinate with each component.

Announcement: The next meeting will be in September or October. It will include the presentation of inception workshop report.

Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m.

11



Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Venue: Function Room, Vie Hotel Bangkok

Presiding: Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion

Members Present: Mr. Surayuth Boonmatat Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Mr. Tanit Onnuch CIMB Thai

Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha UNIDO

Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai IEE Project

Observers Present: Mr. Thanate Makelai Department of Industrial Promotion

Mrs. Wilaiporn Champrasit Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mrs. Siripen Kusalanon Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mr. Noppadol Janya-Adisai Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mrs. Ruangporn Thanyasiri Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mr. Sarun Panyatham CIMB Thai

Mr. Nutthaklit Nidhiprabha Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand

Mrs. Sooksiri Chamsuk UNIDO

Miss Atchareeya Pongput IEE Project

12


Absent: Mr. Prasong Norajit Department of Industrial Works

Miss Ampornpan Wongtharua Office of Industrial Economics

Representative from Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand

Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Tuesday, May 14, 2013, in Function Room in Vie Hotel Bangkok. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas, Chairperson, at 9:30 a.m.


Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas informed that Mr. Sophon Pholprasit, Chairperson, had occupied by government duty therefore he was authorized to be in charge as Chairperson. Mr. Kobchai requested for approval to be in charge as chairperson in case Mr. Sophon could not preside over the meeting.

Mr. Virat Aja-Apisit authorized Surayuth Boonmatat to act as Vice Chair of Project Steering Committee. Mr. Kobchai requested for approval to be in charge as chairperson in case Mr. Sophon could not preside over the meeting.

The Committee unanimously approved Mr. Kobchai to act as Chairperson.

Session 2 Secretary’s Report:

The minutes of the March 27, 2012, meeting was approved as read.


Ms. Uma reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2012 as follow: - Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Inception Workshop on June 6, 2012 with 146 participants - Energy Management System Awareness Workshop on July 10 and September 10, 2012 with total 151 participants - Energy Management System User Training on July 12-13, September 3-4, 2012 and February 18-19, 2013 with total 256 participants - Steam System Optimization User Training - Pumping System Optimization User Training - Compressed Air System Optimization User Training - Energy Management System National Expert Training - Thai Experts would be trained how to implement and write report from International Experts - Equipment Procurement for Industrial Energy Systems Optimization - Thai Experts would use equipment to evaluate energy efficiency of candidate plants.

IEE Project would report the progress of project activities every 3 along with UNIDO activities progress report to Office of Industrial Economics

In 2013, IEE would open the bidding to seek organizer to arrange Energy Management System Awareness Workshop in order to guarantee the invitation of management level participants.

Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity would be commenced in the 3rd quarter of 2013. DEDE would lead this component.

13


Mr. Kobchai suggested to repeat the activities therefore IEE Project would know the factories needs. Mr. Surayuth Boonmatat expressed that the project activities should respond to the factories benefits.

Mr. Sanjaya commented that normally the project would give an evaluation to the training participants therefore the project could improve the next trainings.


Ms. Uma discussed about co-finance and recommended that the co-finance could be in in-kind such as printing materials, training venues including training promotion. Ms. Uma also asked for the advice how to record and report the co-finance activities.

Mr. Kobchai suggested that the project could use the meeting rooms in DIP Office in Rama 4 to organize the trainings and DIP had already changed the air condition closing time to opening hours

Mr. Sanjaya commented that Thai experts would receive intensive training by International experts. They would be trained through a training session and on-site process. Each expert would also consult and access support from international experts. They also had to pass the exam in order to be registered as National Experts

Mr. Kobchai also suggested that IEE project should request the training activities plan from DIP so the project could plan to promote the project activities with DIP’s activities. The project also could plan the activities for the next year and Mr. Kobchai would sign for it so the project could coordinate with other departments in order to promote the activities.

Mr. Thaned suggested that The Institute of Industrial Energy of The Federation of Thai Industries would hold the energy symposium on August 8, 2013 and he would suggest to put IEE project activities in the agenda.

Ms. Uma asked for suggestion for adding pulp and paper in the targeted industries of the project. Mr. Kobchai suggested to add ethanol and pulp and paper.

The meeting unanimously approved to add pulp and paper to be IEE project targeted industries.

Session 5 Other Issues:

Mr. Kobchai suggested that the PSC committee should be listed by position name therefore the chairperson could authorize any delegate to be in charge as chairperson for the efficiency of the PSC working.

The Committee unanimously approved that the project and DIP should form the list formal PSC committee

Announcement: The next meeting will be held in 2014


14



Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Venue: Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power

Presiding: Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion

Members Present: Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Thanate Makelai Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Prasong Norajit Director of Safety Technology Bureau Department of Industrial Works

Mrs. Sutavadee Techajunta Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Engineer, Experienced Level Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Miss Ampornpan Wongtharua Office of Industrial Economics

Mr. Chalerm Sampanthanaruk The Federation of Thai Industries

Mrs. Rachada Rukpongpibul CIMB Thai

Miss Nanthawan Janprateep Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand

Mr. Chin-Pen Chua Representative and Director UNIDO Regional Office

Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha Project Manager, UNIDO

Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai National Project Coordinator, IEE Project

Observers Present: Mr. Aditad Vasinonta Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Samakki Pocjaroen Department of Industrial Promotion

Mrs. Wilaiporn Champrasit Department of Industrial Promotion

15


Observers Present: Mr. Worawit Jirattiticharoean Department of Industrial Promotion

Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Thai Industrial Standards Institute



Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Wednesday, February 19, 2014, in Alpha Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power. The meeting was called to order by Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang, Chairperson, at 10:00 a.m.


Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang, Chairperson, would be occupied by government duty therefore she would authorize Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas to be in charge as Chairperson

The committee unanimously approved Mr. Kobchai to act as Chairperson.


The minutes of the May 14, 2013, meeting was approved as read.

Session 3 Old Business:

Ms. Uma Wirutskulshai, National Project Coordinator, informed that according to Project Steering Committee meeting on May 14, 2013, the committee unanimously approved to form formal Project Steering Committee in order to support and monitor project activities. Reference letter No.168/2555, creation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Steering Committee.

The committee unanimously resolved to acknowledge.


Ms. Uma informed that in 2014, the project would arrange project activities as per project core components.

Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation Project were expected to start in June 2014.

Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity would be commenced by developing documents on Evaluation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project and organizing training.

16



Ms. Uma reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2013 as follow:

ISMED was selected to be organizer to arrange Energy System Management Workshop. The workshops were held follow: - September 25, 2013 in Bangkok, November 16, 2013 in Nakorn Ratchasrima, November 20, 2013 in Kanchanaburi and November, 27 2013 in Rayong with total 352 participants. 258 participants from 133 factories were from targeted industries.

Coordinated with TISI to arrange Energy Management User Training. The trainings were held as follow: - February 18-19, 2013 in Bangkok, June 3-4, 2013 in Cholburi and September 26-27, 2013 in Bangkok with total 172 participants 138 participants from 68 factories were from targeted industries.

Energy System Optimization National Expert Training Module 2 and 3 on February 20-22 and June 5-7, 2013 with 8 government personnel, 22 National Expert Candidates and 7 host factory representatives

Coordinated with DIP to arrange System Optimization User Trainings. The trainings were held as follow: - March 18-19 and May 20-21, 2013 Pumping System Optimization - April 22-23, 2013 Steam System Optimization - June 17-18, 2013 Compressed Air System Optimization - Total 227 participants were trained from System Optimization Trainings. 166 participants from 71 factories were from targeted industries - Steam System Optimization National Expert Training on April 24-26, 2013 with 1 government personnel, 18 National Expert Candidates and 18 host factory/candidate plant representatives - Pumping System Optimization National Expert Training on May 14-17, 2013 with 3 government personnel, 14 National Expert Candidates and 3 host factory/candidate plant representatives - Compressed Air System Optimization National Expert Training on June 11-14, 2013 with 3 government personnel, 15 National Expert Candidates and 7 host factory/candidate plant representatives

Mr. Kobchai commented that PMU should demonstrate energy saving result of host facility/candidate plant before and after participating the project and also the training evaluations. Ms. Uma informed that PMU would start monitoring host facility/candidate plant implementation results in 2014

Mr. Sanjaya informed that there would be internal audit in the 3rd - 4th quarter of 2014 in order to monitor the progression of the project activities and financial cooperation.


17


Session 6 Other Issues:

Adding targeted industries

Ms. Uma asked for suggestion for adding targeted industries in the project. Mr. Sanjaya suggested that the project could add more targeted industries by creation working group to consider the studies and the reason and propose to the committee.

The committee unanimously approved that the project could add more targeted industries but should form the working group to consider the studies and the reason and propose to the committee again

Certification Distribution Ceremony for Qualified National Experts

Ms. Uma asked for opinion to hold a Certification Distribution Ceremony for candidates who were qualified as National Experts on DIP anniversary event.


Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation Project

Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on the number of Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation Project. The target was 50 factories on Energy Management System and 75 projects on System Optimization. Each year there should be 15 factories participating Energy Management System and 75 projects on System Optimization. Energy Management System could coordinate with TLC project and System Optimization could coordinate with TEM project.

The committee unanimously approved that the project should coordinate

Creation of working group

Mr. Kobchi suggested forming the working group in order to coordinate between project partners

The committee unanimously approved that the project should create working group and propose to director general.

Announcement: The next meeting will be held in 2015


18



Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Venue: Epsilon Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power

Presiding: Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion

Members Present: Mrs. Supa Tangkittikhun Department of Industrial Promotion

Mrs. Sutavadee Techajunta The Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mr. Prasong Norajit Department of Industrial Works

Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Mr. Pongsak Laoswatchaikul Office of Industrial Economics

Mrs. Rachada Rukpongpibul CIMB Thai


Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha UNIDO

Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai IEE Project

Observers Present: Mr. Samakki Pocharoen Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Worawit Jirattiticharoean Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Witawat Jainatee Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Sorawids Chailertwanitkul UNIDO



19


Absent: Representative from the Office of Industrial Economics

Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Tuesday, February 24, 2015, in Epsilon Room, Pullman Bangkok King Power. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas, Chairperson, at 10:00 a.m.


Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas informed that Mrs. Atchaka Sribunruang, Chairperson, was occupied by govern-ment duty therefore Mr. Kobchai Sungsitthisawas was authorized to be in charge as Chairperson

The committee unanimously approved Mr. Kobchai to act as Chairperson.


The minutes of the February 19, 2014, meeting was approved as read.

Session 3 Old Business:

Ms. Uma Wirutskulshai, National Project Coordinator, informed that according to Project Steering Committee meeting on February 19, 2014, the committee unanimously approved to form working group in order to support and monitor project activities. Reference letter No.1/2557, creation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Working Group.

Ms. Uma reported that referring to the letter no. 30/2558, the project steering committee member had changed from Director of Bureau of Targeted Industries Development to Director Division of Sectoral Industries Development 2


Session 4 Information

Project Steering Committee Representative Assignment

Mrs. Sutavade Techajunta, Director of Inspection Body Accreditation Group, Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI) informed that Mr. Virat Aja-Apisit, Deputy Secretary-Generals, was retired. The new Deputy Secretary- General position was in assignment process.

Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan, representative from Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE) informed that Mrs. Sirinthorn Vongsoasup was retired. The department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency assigned Mrs. Amaraporn Achawangkul, Energy Conservation Expert, to be representative.


Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2014

Ms. Uma reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2014 as follows:

20


Energy System Management Workshops were held as follow: - September 15, 2014 in Khonkaen, September 29, 2014 in Songkhla, October 8, 2014 in Ayuthaya, October 13, 2014 in Bangkok and October 17, 2014 in Samutsakorn. - The total number of participants since the implementation was 408 out of 500 targeted participants or 82%.

Energy Management User Trainings in coordination with TISI were held as follow: - February 26-27 and March 11-12, 2014 in Bangkok, May 14-15, 2014 in Rayong, July 23-24, September 10-11 and November 24-25, 2014 in Bangkok. - The total number of factories since the implementation was 144 out of 300 targeted factories or 48%.

Energy System Optimization National Expert Training Batch 2, Module 1 and 2 on May 21-23 and September 3-5, 2014 with 7 government personnel, 21 National Expert Candidates and 9 host factory representatives

System Optimization User Trainings in coordination with DIP were held as follow: - February 17-18 and June 17-18, 2014 Compressed Air System Optimization - July 1-2 and December 2-3, 2014 Pumping System Optimization - July 21-22 and December 11-12, 2014 Steam System Optimization - Total 612 participants were trained from 400 targeted participants or 153% - Steam System Optimization National Expert Training Batch 2 on August 25-27, 2014 with 11 National Expert Candidates and 11 host factory/ candidate plant representatives - Compressed Air System Optimization National Expert Training Batch 2 on September 22-26, 2014 with 9 National Expert Candidates and 4 host factory/ candidate plant representatives

Certification Distribution Ceremony for Qualified National Experts was held at the celebration of Department of Industrial Promotion’s 72nd anniversary on August 28, 2014. 29 Energy System Optimization National Experts Batch 1 and 30 System Optimization National Experts Batch 1 attended the event.

Steam System Optimization vendor seminar and trainings as follow: - August 29, 2014 and November 13-14, 2014 in Bangkok. - The total number of vendors attended the trainings was 22 out of 50 targeted vendors or 45%

Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity was studied by delivering questionnaire to 13 factories representatives and financial institutions. Group meeting and interview were organized to brainstorm the scope of financial capacity building training for financial institutions and factories.

The study showed that creditability was the first criteria used in the credit underwriting process for loan approval. Moreover, the financial institutions did not have any special method for any loan application for energy efficiency project. However, IEE project could strengthen and support both factories and financial institutions to understand the financial criteria for industrial energy efficiency project and financial proposal preparation.

Financial Capacity Building training would start in 2015 and would be held at least 4 trainings.

There was no target number of participant in this component but IEE Project would continue to organize the training to support factories and financial institutions.

The estimate energy savings were based on Energy Management System and System Optimization assessment reports. The potential results delivered 25,990 MWh of electricity savings or 31% from target 83,723 MWh, and 630,900 GJ of fuel savings or 33% from target 1,914,142 GJ. Total potential emission reduction was 46,000 tCO2 or 23% from target 196,757 tCO2.


Mid-term Evaluation

21


Mr. Sanjaya informed that during April to May, international evaluator and national evaluator would meet with DIP executives and other project partners. The objective of the evaluation was to monitor project activities execution and co-financing in order to improve project activities. The report would be circulated to the committee when it was done.

Mr. Kobchai suggested that there should be an extra evaluation focusing on project activities monitoring since it could be a guideline for other projects in the future and PMU should organize another project steering committee meeting to monitor the evaluation results.

Mr. Sanjaya informed that the mid-term evaluation was a part of activity to comply with GEF regulations. However, the committee could give feedback to the evaluator and attend the overview evaluation result on the last day.

The committee unanimously approved that the working group would invite the committee to attend the evaluation result presentation and then circulated draft result within the committee.

Session 5: Consideration Issue

Link the existing government’s energy reward to the recognition program stated in the project document

Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on linking the existing government’s energy reward to the recognition program.

Mr. Kobchai commented that qualified national experts could suggest factory representatives to participate energy efficiency projects from Ministry of Industry and Ministry of Energy. For the factories that did not qualify the energy reward, the project could invite them to attend extra trainings in order to support and enhance their energy efficiency in their factories.

The committee unanimously approved that the working group would coordinate with TISI and DIP focal point to start the framework on recognition program.

Use the existing mechanism to support the peer-to-peer network

Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on using the existing mechanism to support the peer-to-peer network between the training participants.

Mr. Kobchai suggested that the qualified national experts could help forming the network between training participants and factory representatives.

Ms. Supa also commented that IEE Project activities could combine with Division of Sectoral Industries Development 2’s activities and Ministry of Energy’s activities.

The committee unanimously approved that the PMU would coordinate with the working group to create the framework and establish the peer-to-peer network.

Guidance in term of sustainability after project’s termination

Ms. Uma asked for opinion on framework to be prepared on energy Management System and System Optimization training activities after the project terminated.

Mr. Kobchai suggested that PMU should organize a seminar for training participants to magnify the results before and after participating the project activities and also an extra training or a consultation from national experts to enhance energy efficiency in their factories

22


The committee unanimously approved that the PMU would coordinate with the working group to plan the activities.

Promote the System Optimization Approach to other relevant agencies

Ms. Uma asked for advice on how to promote System Optimization Approach to other relevant agencies.

Mr. Kobchai suggested that the project should create System Optimization e-learning course and promote it and other System Optimization activities through project partner’s websites to expand targeted participants.

The committee unanimously approved that the working group would coordinate with DIP focal point to discuss the framework on e-learning course and activity promotion.

Announcement: The next PSC meeting will be held in 2016


23



Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Venue: Kamonporn Room, Sukosol Hotel

Presiding: Mrs. Anong Paijitprapapon Deputy Director-General Department of Industrial Promotion

Members Present: Mr. Jaruphan Jarayophat Director of Division 2 of Sectoral Industries Development Department of Industrial Promotion

Mrs. Sutavadee Techajunta Acting Expert on Technical Regulations The Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Mr. Pongpan Vorasayan Engineer, Experienced Level Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

Mr. Panotson Sujayanont Mechanical Engineer, Senior Level Department of Industrial Works

Mrs. Luckana Thitithamrongchai Office of Industrial Economics

Miss Woranart Meepoomroo The Federation of Thai Industries


Mr. Sanjaya Man Shrestha Project Manager, UNIDO

Miss Uma Wirutsakulshai National Project Coordinator, IEE Project

Observers Present: Miss Kitsiri Kaewpipat Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Industry

Mr. Worawit Jirattiticharoean Department of Industrial Promotion

Miss Salita Sinlapabodin Department of Industrial Promotion

Mr. Sorawids Chailertwanitkul UNIDO

24


Observers Present: Miss Praweenaporn Arunrad Office of Industrial Economics

Mr. Nuttawut Chuenarom IEE Project


Absent: Representative from CIMB Bank

Call to Order: The meeting of Project Steering Committee of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE) was held on Monday, January 17, 2017, in Kamonporn 1 Room, Sukosol Hotel. The meeting was called to order by Mrs. Anong Paijitprapapon, Chairperson, at 10:30 a.m.


Mrs. Anong Paijitprapapon greeted the committee and opened the annual Industrial Energy Efficiency Project Steering Committee meeting.


The minutes of the February 24, 2015, meeting was approved as read.

Session 3 Information

Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2016

Ms. Uma Wirutskulshai, National Project Coordinator, reported the progress of Industrial Energy Efficiency Project (IEE)’s activities in 2016. According to project document, there were four components to deliver outcomes from the achievement of outputs and implementation of the activities as followed: ISO Compliant Energy Management Systems, Industrial Energy Systems Optimization, Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity and Implementation of Energy Management and Systems Optimization Projects. IEE project was implemented on 6 March 2012 and had completed 87% of activities. The project was expected to complete all activities within 30 June 2017. IEE project was granted 3,620,000 USD from Global Environment Facility. By that time, the funding had been spent 3,255,646 USD. The main expenses were the cost of national and international expert, training and instrument etc.

Co-financing for the project was divided into cash and in-kind. In-kind included time the management and staffs spent in project activities and training venue etc. Cash included utility cost, meeting and training expense and consultant fees etc. For industrial sector, in-kind co-financing included time and expense the factories spend for project activities and training, and cash co-financing included training registration fees, implementation fees and certification fees.

Ms. Uma informed that project partners could inform PMU if they had additional information and figures on co-financing.

1,012 factories from 50 provinces (Bangkok and industrial estate areas) attended project activities. 7 target industrial sectors consisted of food and beverages, textiles, paper and paper products, chemicals and chemical products, rubber and plastics products, non-metallic mineral products and basic metals. The objectives and expected outcomes identified in project document were thermal savings, electricity savings and greenhouse gas reductions. PMU had evaluated the implementation reports from national experts and found that factories that

25


implemented energy management system and system optimization had potential to save thermal energy and reduce greenhouse gas more than the expected savings (1,914,142 GJ and 196,757 CO2 tons of emissions), and also electricity usage at 94% of expected savings (93,714 MWh). However, PMU had subcontractor to assess the actual savings for 150 factories for energy management system and 150 factories for system optimization. The progress was currently ongoing.

Component 1: ISO Compliant Energy Management Systems

PMU in coordination with TISI organized system optimization trainings and the activities outputs were as follow: - Publish and distribute more than 2,700 training manuals in Thai and English along with 1,150 copies of ISO 50001 standard and 4,500 sets of promotional materials such as bag, notebook and pen. - Website, basecamp project management program and membership registration were created to establish peer to peer network among training participants. - 62 qualified national experts/ factory personnel trained on energy management systems - 364 factories out of 300 targeted factories attended 2 days Energy Management User Trainings. - Awareness workshop with total number of representatives from management level of 604 out of 500 target participants.

Component 2: Industrial Energy Systems Optimization

PMU in coordination with DIP organized system optimization trainings and the activities outputs were as follow: - Publish and distribute more than 3,000 copies of training manual on Steam, Pumping, Fan and Compressed Air. - 60 vendors/ suppliers from 50 target vendors attended system Optimization vendor training were - System Optimization National Expert training were held and there are 39 out of 50 qualified experts. At that time, Fan system optimization expert training was still ongoing and Fan system optimization expert examination would be held in February. System Optimization National Expert training and examination were expected to complete by June 2017. - 1,126 out of 400 targeted participants attended system Optimization User Training

Component 3: Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity

PMU in coordination with DEDE organized component 3: Enhancement of Industrial EE Financing Capacity as follow: - Study on Industrial EE Financing Capacity was finished and the report was circulated to project partners. - Total 34 participants from 9 financial institutions attended 2 Financial Capacity Building trainings for financial sector. - Total 97 participants from 40 factories attended 3 Financial Capacity Building trainings for industrial sector.

Component 4: Implementation of Energy Management and Systems Optimization Projects

The estimate energy savings were based on Energy Management System and System Optimization assessment reports. The progress was determined as below: - Energy management survey for 150 factories was being conducted. - ISO 50001 Energy Management System Implementation was conducted by qualified national experts. 38 out of 50 factories were completed; 23 factories were certified, 15 factories had been completed but not yet certified. 12 factories were on process of implementation. - 57 out of 75 targeted systems assessments were completed. 10 systems under TEM and biomass project were under the process of handling assessment reports. However, there were a number of assessments that PMU had not received the reports from national experts yet. - 50 system optimization implementation projects were on progress. - 3 out of 25 targeted case studies were completed.

26


Ms. Uma informed that according to midterm review that was conducted in 2015, there were comments from international evaluator as below: - The sustainability of training activities. After the project closure, project partners would use the training contents and materials, and PMU would consider delivering the contents to other institutes. - The possibility to integrate training content to university curriculum. The purpose of the integration was to incorporate the study of energy management system and system optimization in university level.

Ms. Uma added that working group meeting was conducted on 7 September 2016 and the solutions about training content integration were as follow: - Deliver training material to project partners - PMU had discussed with qualified national experts who also were university lecturers and they concluded that PMU should adjust some of training contents to be more suitable for university curriculum. PMU would focus on Energy Management System in conformance with ISO 50001 and Steam System Optimization. When the new contents completed, PMU would distribute to project partners and university without any expenses.

IEE Project activities in 2017

Ms. Uma informed the committee about the planned activities in 2017 as follow: - PMU in coordination with TISI would organize 2 Energy Management System User trainings on February and June. - PMU in coordination with DIP would organize awareness workshop, Biomass operator training, and 2 steam system optimization assessments. - PMU in coordination with DEDE would develop E-learning program on financial evaluation content to be fully interactive. Currently it is under bidding process.

Moreover, PMU would create promotional video on Energy Management System and System Optimization, organize curriculum integration with university, focus group meeting to promote project activities and outcomes, and project closure event.


Session 4: Consideration Issue

Extension of project end date

Ms. Uma proposed to extend the project end date from 31 August 2017 to 28 February 2018.

Since there was some delay in some factories under Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation program therefore, this component would be expected to complete within June 2017. After that the project would need to prepare for final review, document management, project asset and equipment transfer to project partners.

Mr. Sanjaya added that the reason the project needed to extend the closing date for 6 months was to follow up on the outcomes of Energy Management System and System Optimization Implementation. This information would be benefit for project partners and GEF as a donor. Moreover, the process of final review were expected to finish on the new closing date.

The committee unanimously approved to extend the project closing date to 28 February 2018.

Industrial Energy Efficiency Achievement Awards

Ms. Uma asked for suggestion on Industrial Energy Efficiency Achievement Awards. Factories that had participated in project activities could send their case studies and the winner would be invited to present their case in the conference abroad. The objective of this award was to obtain case studies as per stated in project document.

27


Mrs. Sutavadee agreed to organize the event but concerned if it would duplicate with Energy Awards of Ministry of Industry.

Mr. Jaruphun commented that there were similar competitions under Ministry of Industry. If possible, PMU should propose other kind of activity for committee to consider.

Ms. Woranart agreed to organize the awards and added that industrial sector could benefit from the event such as the winner would be guest interviewee in project partner events, or the winning factory would allow site visit.

Mr. Pongpan also agreed to organize the event and suggested to categorize the prizes into systems as in project document.

Mrs. Luckana agreed with other committee and suggested that PMU should have clear award rule and criteria for transparency. PMU should also promote and demonstrate that industrial sector would benefit from this activity.

Ms. Nantawan suggested that PMU should be aware of confidential information from the factories.

Ms. Uma informed that PMU would send documents out to be filled by factories and the working group would discuss about the awards criteria.

Mr. Panotson agreed that the awards would motivate the factories and added that PMU should select factories to compete in the international level, therefore the project could extend the outcome of project activities.

Mr. Sanjaya informed that the project needed information on energy saving, technique, energy investment and commitment to share with industrial sector. However, the project were willing to follow the committee resolutions.

Mr. Worawit suggested that the PMU needed clear criteria and fair awards judges. The application duration should not too short to avoid any complaint from the factories

Mr. Jaruphun advised that the working group should start discussing the criteria and details of the awards to avoid rush application duration.

Ms. Uma added that the awards would be held under Industrial Energy Efficiency Project name.

The committee unanimously approved to organize Achievement Awards and working group would discuss in details about the awards criteria.

Transfer of assets and instruments to project partners

Ms. Uma informed that after the project closure phase, PMU would transfer assets and office equipment to DIP. Instruments would be transferred to DIP, DEDE and DIW. TISI did not request to obtain the instrument since there was no need to use in the field work. Each representative from project partners had already discussed about instrument distribution.

Mr. Worawit informed that 53 instrument would be distributed based on usage in the field. However, some instruments had other equipment attached therefore PMU would arrange groups of instrument and circulate letter to inform project partners again.

The committee unanimously approved to coordinate with representative from project partners on equipment distribution.

Announcement: The next PSC meeting will be held before final review which is expected to be in September or November 2017


29

Annex BGrant and Co-financing

Annex B

Grant and Co-financing

30


B.1 GEF’s Grant

The GEF grant of $3,620,000 was utilized for the project implementation. The details of budget allocation and grant utilization are shown in Table b.1.

Table b.1 GEF’s grant utilization

Budget Line GEF Grant Disbursed (US$)

1100 - International Experts 1,378,691.30

1500 - Project Travel 81,518.16

1700 - National Experts 733,479.36

2100 - Subcontracts 545,227.27

3000 - Trainings/Fellowships/Study Tours 248,412.52

3500 - International Meetings 19,996.68

4300 - Premises 2,350.30

4500 - Equipment 350,437.03

5100 - Sundries 189,356.30

Total 3,549,469

Table b.2 Explanation of budget line

Class Nature of expense

1100 Long-term and short-term international experts.

1500 Travel of international and national staff holding contracts with UNIDO.Travel expenditures away from duty station

1700 National experts/ Consultants

2100 All costs relating to subcontracts up to 20,000 EURO of contract service

3000 All costs of individual fellowship/ delegate programme/ study tours/ in-service training

3500 All costs related to the meeting excluding UNIDO staff travel

4300 Office rent, office cleaning, maintenance and repairs, including garage and related costs.

4500 All equipment, non-expendable and expendable equipment, freight charges for non-expendable equipment, major repairs to non-expendable equipment. Clearing forwarding and insurance charges

5100 Vehicle maintenance, insurance, repairs and operations including fuels and lubricantsDocuments printing, photocopying, translating Miscellaneous costs

31


B.2 Co-financing

Table b.3 Detail of co-financing (exchange rate = 31.54 Baht/$ as of 1 February 2018)

Co-financier Type Estimated Amount ($) Contribution during implementation ($)*

Ministry of Industry- Department of Industrial Promotion- Thai Industrial Standards Institute

Cash and In-kind 2,445,000 1,708,563

Ministry of Energy- Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency

In-kindLoan

200,0005,000,000

1,633,8851,328,605

SME Development Bank Loan 3,000,000 Not specified

CIMB Thai Loan 5,000,000 Not specified

Industrial Sector Cash and In-kind Not specified 1,825,893

Total co-financing 15,645,000 6,496,946

*Based on calculation of the actual contribution and participation in the project activities

The basis of calculation for co-financing is shown in Table b.4.

Table b.4 Description of co-financing

Type of co-financing

Project’s Partners Industry

Cash utility’s cost, organizing training, printing of training materials, consultant fee

registration cost of training (industry), investment for improvement project, certification cost

In-kind Management’s and staff’s time, premises facilities

personnel’s time and costs incurred from attending trainings and implementing EnMS and SO projects in participating industries

Loan Loan amount provided to the factories participated in the project activities

33

Annex CList of Project’s Equipment and Assets

Annex C

List of Project’s Equipment and Assets

34


C.1 Equipment

During the implementation phase, the IEE project procured the equipment to support the energy assessment and monitoring. After the project termination, all equipment was transferred to the project partners as suggested by the PSC. The list of equipment and the recipients is shown in Table c.1.

Table c.1 List of equipment

No. Items Amount Transfer to

DIP DEDE DIW

1 Flue gas analyzer, BACHARACH PCA3 5 3 0 2

2 Flue gas analyzer, TESTO350 1 1 0 0

3 Infrared camera, FLIR E40 5 2 2 1

4 TDS/Conductivity analyzer, Amprobe WT-60 3 1 1 1

5 Ultrasonic flow meter, GE PT878 3 1 1 1

6 Tachometer, Extech 3 1 1 1

7 Ultrasonic leak detector, UE System 3 2 1 0

8 Ultrasonic leak detector, Amprobe ULD-300 5 5 0 0

9 Temperature gun, Fluke 561 5 4 1 0

10 Digital thermometer, Fluke 51 5 3 2 0

11 Temperature probe for Fluke 51 4 3 1 0

12 Power clamp meter, Extech 5 4 1 0

13 Power Quality Analyzer, Fluke 43B 3 1 1 1

14 Pressure transducer PV350 3 2 1 0

15 TrakAIR 4 Channel data logger (DP3040) 10 8 2 0

16 TrakAIR 8 Channel data logger (DP3080) 10 6 4 0

17 TrakAIR Compressed Air Flow transducer (DP3100-U2430) 10 7 3 0

18 TrakAIR Pressure Transducer 0-200 psig (DP3920-0200) 40 32 8 0

19 TrakAIR Pressure Transducer 0-1000 psig (DP3920-0200) 4 2 2 0

20 TrakAIR Current Transducer Input 0-5 AAC / Output 4-20 ma DC (DP3830-U5420)

20 12 8 0

21 TrakAIR Current Clamp (DP3850-1000M) w / Output Loop connector (DP3850-LC01)

34 24 10 0

22 TrakAIR KW Transducer 6 4 2 0

23 TrakAIR Universal Transducer cable (DP3351-0050) (50 ft.)

72 52 20 0

24 Glove class O 5 4 1 0

25 Heat resistant duck tape 5 5 0 0

26 Stop watch 5 5 0 0

27 Troche 5 3 0 2

28 Digital camera, Cannon powershot A3400 5 5 0 0

29 TrakAir CA flow transducer FKT-3DP1A-5-80-400 2 1 1 0

30 Stroboscope Shimpo DT-311A-2 2 1 1 0

35


No. Items Amount Transfer to

DIP DEDE DIW

31 Outdoor/Industrial data logger 3 2 1 0

32 H0B0 Current Transducer [CTV-C] 100A 3 2 1 0

33 H0B0 Current Transducer [CTV-D] 200A 3 2 1 0

34 H0B0 warePro : Graphing&Analysis software 3 2 1 0

35 Onset U12-001 (HOBO U12 Temp) 2 1 1 0

36 Onset TMC6-HD 6 ft Air/Water / Soil Temp (waterproof) 3 2 1 0

37 Onset TMC20-HD 20 ft Air/Water / Soil Temperature Probe 3 2 1 0

38 Onset T-VER-PXU-L Differential air pressure transducer sensor

2 1 1 0

39 Onset AC-SENS-1 CABLE-ADAP5 12V 400mA sensor AC power adapter

2 1 1 0

40 Onset CABLE-4-20mA 4-20 mA input adapter cable 4 3 1 0

41 Onset CABLE-2.5-STEREO 0 to 2.5Vdc input adapter cable 4 3 1 0

42 Onset CABLE-ADAP5 0 to 5Vdc input adapter cable 4 3 1 0

43 FlowKintetics: S-Type Universal length pitôt tube attaches to pipe and tubing Rated to 450 deg F (232 deg C)

1 1 0 0

44 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160-18 (Stainless steel Pitot tube, 5/16" dia., 18-5/8" insertion length)

5 5 0 0

45 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-02 (Ellipsoidal tip Pitot tube, 0.48 meter insertion length)

2 2 0 0


2 2 0 0


2 2 0 0


2 2 0 0

49 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160E-U (Ellipsoidal tip Universal Pitot tube, attaches to any length of 3/4" sch. 40 pipe)

2 2 0 0

50 Dwyer Pitot tube model 166-6 2 2 0 0

51 Dwyer Pitot tube model 166-12 2 2 0 0

52 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160S-48 ("S" type stainless steel Pitot tube, 1.21 meter insertion length)

2 2 0 0

53 Dwyer Pitot tube model 160S-60 ("S" type stainless steel Pitot tube, 1.52 meter insertion length)

2 2 0 0

36


C.2 Project’s Assets

The project procured a vehicle, computers and accessories, office furniture, and office supplies to use for the day-to-day operation. After the project termination, the project’s assets were transferred to DIP according to the PSC’s suggestion. The list of project’s assets is shown in Table c.2.

Table c.2 List of assets

Description Amount

1 Toyota Innova 2.0 1

2 Cabinet CB-72 Blue 3

3 Cabinet with glass door 3

4 Cabinet with glass door 4

5 Chair Furradec SR2-AC 2

6 Chair Furradec TARIS Black/Blue 9

7 Desk L shape 160 × 60 cm. 1

8 Desk 200 × 87 × 74.5 cm. 1

9 Desk Furradec ST150D 1

10 Meeting table Furradec ETC 180 1

11 Drawer Modernform SOHO 2

12 Small shelf 1

13 Phone 2

14 Iphone 4s 16GB 2

15 Samsung S5360 1

16 Samsung A5 1

17 Desktop HP Pavillion p6-2172L 2

18 Desktop Hp Pavillion 1

19 Monitor HP W1972b LED 18.5” 1

20 Monitor Samsung LED 18.5” 1

21 Toshiba Protege R830 1

22 Toshiba Protege R930 1

23 Sony VAIO T 13.3” 1

24 Logitech Keyboard K120-920-002582 1

25 Logitech wireless mouse 1

26 Server system 1

27 HP Laserjet Pro M1212nf 1

28 HP Laserjet Pro M12W 1

29 HP Color Laserjet Pro CP1025 1

30 Projector Panasonic LB2VEA LCD 1

31 Camera Sony HDR-CX190E Full HD 1

32 Camera Canon Powershot A2300 IS 16 MP 1

37


Description Amount

33 Camera Canon EOS 600DKIT 18-55IS 1

34 Whiteboard Fuji OA 90 × 150 cm. 1

35 Whiteboard OA 80 × 120 cm. 1

36 Flipchart 1

37 Amplifier with speaker Deccon 2

38 Extension cord 10

39 Cupboard Furradec 120 1

40 Table 127. 2 × 40 × 76.5 cm. 1

41 Table 121.9 × 61 × 74.3 cm. 1

42 Fan 2

43 Water storage RW0336 9 l 1

44 Electric Hot Pot Toshiba PLK-GF22S 1

45 Microwave Electrolux 1

46 Refrigerator Sharp 1

39

Annex DEnergy Saving Calculation

Annex D

Energy Saving Calculation

40


Tab

le d

.1 E

ner

gy s

avin

g ca

lcu

lati

on o

f all

mea

sure

s im

ple

men

ted

wit

h t

he

IEE

Pro

ject

’s d

irec

t su

pp

ort

Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Aero

flex

1

Surv

ey e

nerg

y sa

ving

2015

214

10

942

8

217

2Re

duce

Sys

tem

Lea

kage

2015

152

7730

415

4Am

pol F

ood

Proc

essi

ng

3St

eam

leak

mai

nten

ance

pro

gram

2015

48

620

97

240

4Re

duce

leak

age

(Com

pres

sed

Air)

2015

375

189

750

379

Apex

Pla

stec

h

5Re

duce

leak

age

2015

262

13

252

4

265

6Ai

r Com

pres

sor S

eque

nce

Cont

rol S

yste

m20

1529

014

758

029

37

Inst

all h

igh

effic

ienc

y ai

r com

pres

sor

2015

6533

130

668

Redu

ce A

ir in

let T

empe

ratu

re20

1536

818

673

637

3Ba

ngko

k Iro

n an

d St

eel

Wor

k 9

Turn

Off

the

pum

p20

1522

12

44

2310

Inst

alle

d VS

D c

ontr

olle

r20

1526

613

453

226

9Be

er th

ip b

rew

ery

(1991

)

11O

ptim

ize

Set P

oint

Gly

col s

yste

m B

for

ferm

enta

tion

proc

ess

2015

10

520

10

12Im

prov

e Ef

ficie

ncy

Biog

as P

roce

ss

2015

158

3015

13In

crea

sing

% C

onde

nsat

e Re

turn

2015

490

460

980

9314

Repl

ace

light

s in

war

ehou

se20

151.5

13

215

Chan

ge b

oile

r's fu

el to

Bitu

min

ous

coal

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

16Co

nden

sate

retu

rn im

prov

emen

t20

15n/

an/

an/

an/

a17

Redu

ce le

akag

e in

the

syst

em20

1681

4181

41BS

Met

al18

Redu

ce le

akag

e20

1526

13

52

27C.

P. R

ice

19Re

duce

unl

oad

time

of P

olish

er20

1533

1

167

662

33

520

Redu

ce le

akag

e in

Air

com

pres

sion

sys

tem

2015

195

9939

019

821

Ener

gy e

ffici

ent A

ir co

nditi

on re

plac

emen

t20

158.

214

168

22Re

plac

e Fl

uore

scen

t with

LED

ligh

ting

2015

9.48

519

1023

Inst

all V

SD in

blo

wer

sys

tem

2015

340

172

680

344

24Re

duce

air

com

pres

sor p

ress

ure

from

8 to

5 b

ar20

1521

110

742

221

4

41


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Cere

bos

(Lae

m C

haba

ng)

25Im

prov

e co

nden

sing

uni

t of c

hille

rs20

1517

4

8834

8

176

26Im

prov

e co

nden

sing

uni

t of c

hille

d an

d fr

eeze

pr

oces

s20

1533

1766

34

27Re

duce

load

sto

red

in fr

eeze

r20

156.

463

137

28Re

duce

leak

from

com

pres

sed

air

2015

3618

7237

29Be

tter

con

trol

for C

T-60

020

1521

310

842

621

630

Hea

t rec

over

y fr

om C

onde

nsat

e20

151,

580

973,

160

193

31CI

P im

prov

emen

t20

156,

320

387

12,6

4077

4Ce

rebo

s (P

inth

ong)

32St

op u

sing

Dia

phra

gm p

ump

2015

148

75

296

15

033

Usi

ng h

eat

pum

p to

red

uce

stea

m d

eman

d fr

om

boile

r20

157,

403

453

14,8

06

906

34Re

duce

hot

wat

er c

onsu

mpt

ion

in C

IP P

roce

ss20

156,

629

406

13,2

5881

1Ch

an C

ha R

ern

Foam

35In

sula

tion

impr

ovem

ent

2015

11

66

23

212

36Fi

x St

eam

trap

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

37Cl

ean

boile

r com

bust

ion

room

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Char

oen

Pokp

hand

Foo

ds(M

ahac

hai P

lant

)38

Incr

ease

Con

dens

ate

Reco

very

2016

1.7

60

.17

1.76

0.17

39D

ecre

ase

Blow

dow

n20

16

0.2

0.0

2

0.2

00

.02

Char

oen

Pokp

hand

Foo

ds

(Non

gjok

Pla

nt)

40Fi

t VSD

to b

oile

r fan

2013

3.5

2

14

7.0

841

Redu

ce c

hille

r con

dens

ing

pres

sure

2013

4.5

218

9.0

842

Redu

ce le

akag

e20

1556

528

61,

130

571

43Li

nk a

ll co

mpr

esso

r hou

ses

by n

ew p

ipin

g an

d in

stal

l new

VSD

Air

Com

pres

sor.

2015

187

9537

419

0

44Re

duce

tem

pera

ture

at c

ompr

esso

r hou

se20

1518

936

19Ch

aroe

n Po

kpha

nd F

oods

(S

arab

uri P

lant

)45

Leak

redu

ctio

n20

1626

0

131

260

13

1

Cosm

os46

chan

ge b

oile

r blo

w d

own

rate

2016

1,

250

97

1,25

097

CP R

am47

Feed

wat

er E

cono

miz

er20

15

1,78

413

8

3,56

827

6

42


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

CP R

am (L

adkr

aban

g pl

ant)

East

ern

Poly

pack

48Le

ak re

duct

ion

2016

20

1020

1049

Com

pres

sed

air l

eake

d im

prov

emen

t20

1588

0

445

1,76

0

889

50Ch

iller

impr

ovem

ent

2015

515

260

1,0

3052

0Ea

ster

n Po

lypa

ck

(Pla

nt N

o.2)

51Re

duce

Com

pres

sor I

nlet

Tem

pera

ture

(F

rom

36.

7 C

to 3

5.5

C )

2015

23

1246

24

52Re

duce

Gen

erat

ion

Pres

sure

from

8.2

Bar

s to

7.9

0 B

ars

2015

5628

112

57

East

ern

Poly

pack

(P

lant

No.

3)53

Chan

ge C

ompr

esso

r Run

ning

Ord

er20

1529

2

128

584

25

554

Redu

ce S

yste

m L

eaka

ge20

151,

271

642

2,54

21,

285

F&N

Dai

ries

55Re

duce

exc

ess

air

2015

n

/a n

/a

n/a

n/a

56Re

duce

blo

wdo

wn

rate

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

57Fl

ash

stea

m re

cove

ry20

15n/

an/

an/

an/

a58

Cond

ensa

te re

cove

ry20

15n/

an/

an/

an/

a59

Redu

ce s

team

leak

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

60St

eam

trap

fix

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

61Re

duce

pre

ssur

e (2

015

)20

1540

2080

4162

Redu

ce S

yste

m L

eaka

ge (2

015

)20

1536

1972

3763

Leak

redu

ctio

n (2

016

)20

1667

3467

34Fr

iend

ship

Cor

n St

arch

64D

ecre

ase

Blow

dow

n20

16

0.2

50

.02

0.0

00

.25

0.0

2Fr

iesl

and

Cam

pina

65D

ecre

ase

Blow

dow

n ra

te20

16

195

15

195

15Fu

engf

uana

nt

66Su

rvey

ene

rgy

savi

ng (E

lec)

2015

287

14

557

4

290

67Su

rvey

ene

rgy

savi

ng (T

herm

al) B

ioga

s20

1511

,954

23,9

08

Gov

ernm

ent P

harm

aceu

tical

O

rgan

izat

ion

68In

crea

se %

RH in

pro

duct

ion

area

2015

195

99

390

19

869

Chan

ge s

witc

hing

per

iod

of b

oile

r20

15

192

384

Hw

afon

g Ru

bber

(T

haila

nd)

70Im

prov

e fe

ed w

ater

qua

lity

(RO

sys

tem

)20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n

/a71

Redu

ce le

akag

e on

6 b

ars

line

2015

7840

156

7972

Redu

ce le

akag

e on

8 b

ars

line

2015

398

201

796

403

73Re

duce

leak

age

on 1

8 ba

rs li

ne20

1513

468

268

136

74Ch

ange

to h

igh

effic

ient

air

com

pres

sor

2015

1,31

066

22,

620

1,32

4

43


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Inno

late

x75

redu

ce li

ghtin

g at

the

wal

k w

ay20

155.

68

311

6

76

rem

odel

Gas

sta

tion

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

77

Inst

all v

apor

izer

2015

354

2270

843

78

Repl

ace

fluor

esce

nt la

mp

with

LED

2015

1.71

32

79

Incr

ease

Tem

p fr

om 2

4C to

26C

in E

T ar

ea20

158.

414

179

IRPC

80D

evel

op p

rost

eam

for r

eal t

ime

mon

itorin

g th

eir s

yste

m20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n/

a

JBF

81D

ecre

ase

Blow

dow

n20

16

240

15

240

15Ka

naya

ma

Kase

i82

Impr

ove

Insu

latio

n20

15

154

9

308

17Ku

lwon

g

83Re

plac

e lig

hts

from

T8

to L

ED20

1517

9

34

1884

Redu

ce o

pera

ting

time

of th

e ai

r con

ditio

ners

2015

7438

148

7585

Redu

ce p

ress

ure

of c

ompr

esse

d ai

r sys

tem

2015

1.97

14

286

Rota

te th

e he

at s

ink

of c

ompr

esse

d ai

r sys

tem

2015

1.61

32

Mon

key

King

Foo

d

87im

prov

e st

eam

leak

2016

27

2

272

88ch

ange

boi

ler b

low

dow

n ra

te20

1610

87

108

7N

atio

nal S

tarc

h &

Che

mic

al

89Sw

itch

off o

ne s

et o

f ins

trum

ent '

s ai

r dry

er20

1537

19

74

3890

Redu

ce S

yste

m L

eaka

ge20

1512

061

240

122

91Co

mpr

esso

r con

trol

on

trim

com

pres

sor

2015

9347

186

95PI

Indu

stry

92Tr

im p

ump

impe

ller

2015

123

62

246

12

5Pr

emie

r Can

ning

Indu

stry

93st

eam

leak

s m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

ams

2016

925

8892

588

PTT

Glo

bal C

hem

ical

(P

lant

5)

94To

tal E

nerg

y Sa

ving

in 2

014

Y20

14

42,0

00

3,45

812

6,0

00

10,3

7595

Tota

l Ene

rgy

Savi

ng in

20

15Y

2015

26

7,0

00

15,5

3753

4,0

00

31,0

7596

Tota

l Ene

rgy

Savi

ng in

20

16Y

2016

31

3,0

00

18,17

331

3,0

00

18,17

3Re

d Bu

ll 19

88

97Re

duce

Sys

tem

Lea

kage

2015

102

52

204

10

498

Redu

ce G

ener

atio

n Pr

essu

re20

158

416

8

44


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Saha

viriy

a Pl

ate

Mill

99Co

ntro

l ope

ratio

n m

ain

mot

or a

t lev

eler

2013

604

30

52,

416

1,

222

100

Cont

rol t

ime

for T

urn

on/o

ff o

f mot

or h

ydra

ulic

pu

mp

at c

oolin

g be

d20

1388

0.16

352

0.6

4

101

Cont

rol m

otor

of c

oolin

g to

wer

by

VSD

2013

4312

172

4910

2In

stal

l VSD

mot

or fo

r Hot

wat

er p

ump

2014

5729

171

8710

3In

stal

l Hig

h ef

ficie

ncy

Air-

cond

ition

ing

2014

2111

6333

104

Bett

er c

ontr

ol fo

r bal

l rol

ling

proc

ess

2015

6,44

03,

253

12,8

806,

506

105

redu

ce m

otor

's RP

M20

1510

252

204

104

Saha

viriy

a St

eel I

ndus

trie

s

106

Redu

ce d

isch

argi

ng te

mpe

ratu

re o

f sla

b to

124

0 C

(Cha

nge

oper

atio

n pr

actic

e)20

13

40,19

33,

101

16

0,7

7212

,40

4

107

Inst

all h

igh

effic

ienc

y re

cupe

rato

r at

furn

ace

no. 2

2013

84,7

826,

562

339,

128

26,2

49

Sura

bang

yika

n

108

Redu

ce s

team

in b

ottle

was

hing

pro

cess

20

13

5,78

844

8

23,15

21,

792

109

Inst

all

VSD

(Va

riabl

e Sp

eed

Driv

e) 2

00

kW

for

St

ack

& B

ag F

ilter

no.

1 Bl

ower

20

1361

130

92,

444

1,23

6

110

Chan

ging

ligh

ting

to L

ED (1

50 W

to L

ED 5

0 W

) 20

1359

3023

612

011

1Ch

angi

ng t

rans

pare

nt r

oof

for

bott

le p

lant

(re

-du

cing

usi

ng li

ghtin

g en

ergy

) 20

1391

4636

418

4

112

Impr

ove

Inci

nera

tor n

o.1

2013

15,6

071,

208

62,4

284,

832

113

Exce

ss a

ir re

duct

ion.

2015

18,6

201,

441

37,2

402,

883

114

blow

-dow

n ra

te re

duct

ion

2015

23,7

941,

842

47,5

883,

683

115

Stea

m le

ak m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am20

1519

,263

1,49

138

,526

2,98

2Te

p Ki

nsho

Foo

ds

116

Redu

ce E

lect

ricity

in F

REEZ

ER R

oom

2015

303

15

360

6

306

117

Mai

nten

ance

Spl

it ty

pe A

ir Co

nditi

on20

1544

422

488

844

9Th

ai C

onta

iner

s G

roup

11

8Fi

ne tu

ne %

O2

(Yea

rly S

ervi

ce b

y Su

pplie

r)20

15

2,39

418

5

4,78

837

111

9In

stal

l ins

ulat

ion

on n

aked

pip

e20

1520

516

410

32Th

ai M

MA

120

Inst

all A

PC s

yste

m fo

r MM

A#2

plan

t20

15n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

121

Chan

ge L

ED P

roje

ct20

1517

689

352

178

122

Chan

ge c

oolin

g fa

n bl

ade

2015

4925

9850

45


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Thai

Nip

pon

Rubb

er In

dust

ry

123

Inst

all t

imer

for a

ir-co

nditi

oned

2015

6.96

4

14

712

4In

stal

l Coo

ling

Tow

er G

el M

achi

ne20

1510

520

1112

5In

stal

l VSD

at D

ippi

ng s

uppl

y pu

mp

2015

2111

4222

126

Preh

eat W

ash

wat

er b

y Co

nden

sate

wat

er20

1570

635

71,

412

713

Thai

Rua

m Ja

i Kor

at

127

Redu

ce id

le o

f Air

Com

pres

sor 1

2015

414

20

982

8

419

128

Redu

ce e

nerg

y in

take

blo

wer

725

120

1518

936

1812

9Cl

ose

redu

ce fa

n Co

olin

g 1

cell

2015

3418

6835

130

Redu

ce th

e am

ount

of e

xces

s ai

r 20

1593

836

1,87

673

131

Blow

-dow

n co

ntro

l20

1599

338

1,98

677

132

Preh

eat a

ir in

let

2015

1,76

368

3,52

613

6Th

ai U

nion

Fro

zen

Prod

ucts

133

Clea

n bo

iler

heat

tra

nsfe

r su

rfac

es –

boi

ler

B1

and

B720

15

1,10

285

2,

204

171

134

Inst

all E

cono

miz

er o

n bo

iler N

o. C

320

153,

255

252

6,51

050

413

5PR

V c

ontr

ol :

Fluc

tuat

ing

load

redu

ctio

n20

15n/

an/

an/

an/

a13

6TD

S co

ntro

l : C

ontr

ol b

low

dow

n ra

te20

15n/

an/

an/

an/

a13

7St

eam

trap

mai

nten

ance

pro

gram

2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Tong

Sia

ng

138

Surv

ey e

nerg

y sa

ving

(Ele

c)20

1522

7

115

454

23

013

9Su

rvey

ene

rgy

savi

ng (T

herm

al) P

alm

She

ll20

15n/

an/

an/

an/

a14

0Fi

ne tu

ne %

O2

2015

7,59

031

115

,180

623

141

Retu

rn c

onde

nsat

e20

1516

,751

687

33,5

021,

374

142

Impr

ove

stea

m tr

ap le

aks

and

mac

hine

leak

age

2015

4,32

617

78,

652

355

TPI P

olen

e

143

Redu

ce d

eman

d of

Com

pres

sed

air

2015

129

65

258

13

114

4Re

mov

e Cu

rve

Belt

6.10

.02

2015

4.66

29

514

5Re

mov

e Cu

rve

Belt

6.10

.03

2015

4.66

29

514

6Re

mov

e Cu

rve

Belt

7.37

2015

4.66

29

5

46


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

Beg

inM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

UEN

O F

ine

Chem

ical

In

dust

ry14

7In

stal

l New

boi

ler &

Eco

nom

izer

2015

12

,159

682

24

,318

1,36

414

8Re

duce

blo

wdo

wn

rate

2015

975

194

1114

9Re

duce

exc

ess

air

2015

n/a

n/

an/

a

n/a

21,7

5492

1,82

968

,543

46,1

661,

862,

651

Rem

ark:

1. Th

e di

rect

sup

port

from

the

proj

ect c

onsi

sted

of t

he e

xper

t tra

inin

g fo

r hos

t fac

ility

and

can

dida

te p

lant

, the

EnM

S im

plem

enta

tion

and

the

syst

em o

ptim

izat

ion

asse

ssm

ent.

2. n

/a =

not

ava

ilabl

e, th

e co

mpa

ny d

escr

ibed

wha

t the

y ha

ve d

one

to im

prov

e en

ergy

effi

cien

cy, b

ut th

ey d

id n

ot p

rovi

de th

e qu

antit

ativ

e da

ta fo

r cal

cula

tion.

3. T

he c

alcu

latio

n of

the

redu

ctio

n of

GH

G e

mis

sion

use

the

follo

win

g co

-effi

cien

t.

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r grid

ele

ctric

ity

: 0

.505

1 tC

O2 /

MW

h

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r fue

l oil

:

77.4

tC

O2 /

TJ

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r coa

l :

94.6

tC

O2 /

TJ

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r nat

ural

gas

:

56.1

tCO

2 /TJ

–

Emis

sion

s Fa

ctor

for L

PG

: 61

.2

tCO

2 /TJ

–

Emis

sion

s Fa

ctor

for B

iom

ass

: 0

.693

tC

O2 /

ton

4. T

he d

urat

ion

for

GH

G r

educ

tion

calc

ulat

ion

is f

rom

the

impl

emen

ting

year

to

the

end

of p

roje

ct (2

017

). Fo

r ex

ampl

e, a

mea

sure

impl

emen

ted

in 2

015

wou

ld b

e co

nsid

ered

for 2

yea

rs o

f dire

ct im

pact

dur

ing

the

IEE

proj

ect i

mpl

emen

tatio

n. It

has

bee

n as

sum

ed th

at th

e sa

ving

wou

ld b

e co

nser

vativ

ely

coun

ted

for 2

016

and

20

17.

47


Tab

le d

.2 E

ner

gy s

avin

g ca

lcu

lati

on o

f all

mea

sure

s im

ple

men

ted

by

the

fact

orie

s at

ten

din

g th

e 2

-day

use

r tr

ain

ings

Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Adity

a Bi

rla C

hem

ical

s1

Inst

alle

d VS

D c

ontr

olle

r20

16n/

a

n/a

n/a

n/

a 2

Inst

all h

igh

effic

ienc

y m

otor

20

16n/

a

n/a

n/a

n/

a Ai

r Liq

uide

Tha

iland

3In

stal

led

VSD

con

trol

ler

2015

148

75

296

15

04

Inst

all r

eflec

tion

pane

l at l

ight

ing

2015

37

1974

37

Alph

atex

Indu

strie

s5

Resc

hedu

le S

uppl

y-Re

turn

ope

ratio

n20

1521

9

111

438

22

26

insu

latio

n im

prov

emen

t20

15

306

1761

233

Apex

Pla

stec

h

7Ch

ange

old

inje

ctio

n no

. 7 to

All

Elec

tric

In

ject

ion

Mac

hine

2015

193

97

386

19

5

8Ch

ange

old

inje

ctio

n no

. 13

to A

ll El

ectr

ic

Inje

ctio

n M

achi

ne20

1516

2

8232

4

164

9Ch

ange

old

inje

ctio

n no

. 14

to A

ll El

ectr

ic

Inje

ctio

n M

achi

ne20

1516

2

8232

4

164

10Ch

ange

Flu

ores

cent

T8

to L

ED20

1575

38

150

76

Asia

Fib

er11

Clea

n 2

cond

ensi

ng u

nit

2015

300

15

260

0

303

12In

sula

tion

impr

ovem

ent

2015

42

224

84

447

Bang

kok

Alco

hol

Indu

stria

l13

Fix

stea

m tr

ap le

aks

2015

10

66

21

212

14In

stal

led

VSD

con

trol

ler

2015

n/a

n/

a n/

a

n/a

Bang

kok

Iron

and

Stee

l W

orks

15Re

duce

leak

age

2016

n/a

n/

a n/

a

n/a

16In

stal

l rin

g-lo

op p

ipe

2016

n/a

n/

a n/

a

n/a

17In

stal

l seq

uenc

e co

ntro

ller

2016

n/a

n/

a n/

a

n/a

18U

se h

igh

effic

ienc

y ai

r com

pres

sor

2016

n/a

n/

a n/

a

n/a

19In

stal

l VSD

of F

an o

f mot

or N

o.1

2015

139

70

278

141

Berg

soe

Met

als

20In

stal

l VSD

of F

an o

f mot

or N

o.2

2015

139

70

278

141

21Ch

ange

new

bur

ner a

t Fur

nace

120

15

1,44

311

2

2,88

622

322

Chan

ge n

ew b

urne

r at F

urna

ce 2

2015

1,

443

112

2,

886

223

23Co

mpr

esse

d ai

r sys

tem

effi

cien

cy im

prov

emen

t20

1524

12

48

24Be

tagr

o24

Chan

ge n

ew ro

of s

heet

Whi

ch th

e su

nlig

ht

can

pass

thro

ugh

2015

30

1560

30

48


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Beta

gro

Hol

ding

25In

stal

l VSD

con

trol

ler t

o ai

r com

pres

sor

2015

58

2911

6

5826

Inst

all E

cono

miz

er20

15

2,71

217

1

5,42

434

2Ca

rdin

al H

ealth

222

27

Use

hig

h ef

ficie

ncy

mot

or20

1529

2

148

584

29

6

Carp

ets

Inte

rnat

iona

l Th

aila

nd

28Re

duce

exc

ess

air

2015

n/a

n/

a n

/a

n/a

29Bl

owdo

wn

rate

redu

ctio

n20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a30

Flas

h st

eam

reco

very

2015

n/

a n/

a

n/a

n/a

31Re

duce

exc

ess

air

2016

1,

516

96

1,51

696

32Re

duce

boi

ler's

wor

king

hou

rs20

16

2,72

117

2

2,72

117

2

Cere

bos

(Pin

thon

g pl

ant)

33Re

duce

str

eam

pre

ssur

e20

16

109

7

109

7 34

Impr

ove

prod

uctiv

ity a

t Ret

ort p

roce

ss20

16

157

10

157

1035

Impr

ove

prod

uctiv

ity b

y re

duce

hea

ting

time

2016

60

138

60

138

36Im

prov

e In

sula

tion

2016

13

69

13

69

37In

stal

l hig

h ef

ficie

ncy

mot

or (3

15 k

W)

2017

82

41n/

cn/

c

Char

oen

Pokp

hand

Fo

ods

(Sar

abur

i Pla

nt)

38In

stal

l hig

h ef

ficie

ncy

mot

or (2

50 k

W)

2017

72

36n/

cn/

c 39

Min

i Pel

let M

ill20

1711

5

58n/

cn/

c 40

Impr

ove

com

bust

ion

cham

ber a

t boi

ler 1

2017

4,

921

269

n/

cn/

c 41

Fix

the

com

bust

ion

cham

ber

2017

38

817

n/

cn/

c Ch

usin

conc

rete

42Ai

r-co

mpr

esso

r sys

tem

2016

3

13

1

43re

duce

set

poi

nt o

f air

com

pres

sor

2016

7

37

3

44Im

prov

e Po

wer

fact

or v

alue

by

inst

all C

apac

itor

2016

22

1122

11

45Im

prov

e po

wer

fact

or o

f tra

nsfo

rmer

2016

33

1733

17

46Im

prov

e po

wer

fact

or o

f EV

G m

otor

2016

94

4894

48

47Im

prov

e po

wer

fact

or o

f con

cret

e cu

tter

mot

or20

1642

21

42

21Co

smos

Bre

wer

y 48

Redu

ce e

xces

s ai

r20

16

9,05

285

6

9,05

285

649

Impr

ove

effic

ienc

y : r

educ

e fu

el u

sage

2016

18

,526

1,0

390

18,5

261,

039

CP-M

eiji

50In

stal

l VSD

air

com

pres

sor

2016

459

23

245

9

232

CPRA

M51

Inst

alle

d VS

D c

ontr

olle

r20

1565

33

130

66

52Se

t run

ning

seq

uenc

e by

sel

ectin

g hi

gh

effic

ienc

y pu

mp

first

2016

n/a

n/

an/

a

n/a

49


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

East

Wat

er53

Inst

alle

d VS

D c

ontr

olle

r20

16n/

a

n/a

n/a

n/

a 54

Inst

all h

igh

effic

ienc

y m

otor

20

16n/

a

n/a

n/a

n/

a 55

inst

all V

SD c

ontr

olle

r to

air c

ompr

esso

r (10

0 h

p)20

1511

0

5522

0

111

56Ch

ange

Flu

ores

cent

to L

ED

2015

10

520

10

Forw

ard

Free

land

57Ch

ange

ligh

ting

syst

em fr

om 4

00

W

to L

ED 1

8 W

2015

24

1248

25

58In

stal

l new

air

cond

ition

er 1

2,0

00

Btu

20

152

1

4

259

Redu

ce le

akag

e20

1512

6

24

1260

Blow

dow

n ra

te re

duct

ion

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

61

Impr

ove

Insu

latio

n20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a Fu

engf

uana

nt62

Flas

h st

eam

reco

very

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

63Co

nden

sate

reco

very

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

64Fi

x St

eam

leak

s20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a G

J St

eel

65Re

duce

com

pres

sed

air s

et p

oint

2015

328

16

665

6

331

Giff

arin

e Sk

ylin

e La

bora

tory

& H

ealth

Car

e

66Ad

just

coo

ling

wat

er fl

ow ra

te20

1612

3

6212

3

6267

Adju

st c

hille

r sch

edul

e20

1665

33

65

3368

Redu

ce s

team

wor

king

pre

ssur

e (B

oile

r)20

16

206

1520

615

Haa

d Th

ip (S

urat

than

i)69

Chan

ge H

ibay

to L

ED

2016

61

3161

31

70Co

nden

sate

reco

very

2016

30

319

303

19

Imco

Pac

k Co

rpor

atio

n

71Ch

ange

Ven

tilat

ion

fan

to E

vapo

rativ

e Co

olin

g Sy

stem

2016

1,34

0

677

1,34

0

677

72Ch

ange

Wat

er C

ool C

hille

r to

Air C

ool C

hille

r20

161,

633

82

51,

633

82

573

VSD

Con

trol

for C

oolin

g Pu

mp

2016

618

31

261

8

312

Inte

rpro

file

74Re

duce

leak

age

2016

59

3059

30

75Re

duce

inle

t air

tem

pera

ture

2016

n/a

n/

an/

a

n/a

76Re

duce

com

pres

sed

air w

orki

ng p

ress

ure

2016

10

510

5

77In

stal

l VSD

air

com

pres

sor

2016

17

917

9

50


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

IPD

Pac

kagi

ng78

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

16

W @

4,35

0 u

nit

2016

229

11

622

9

116

IRPC

(BTX

Pla

nt)

79H

eat i

nteg

ratio

n of

Uni

t10

0 &

400

at B

TX P

lant

2016

18

6,53

710

,464

18

6,53

710

,464

Kanc

hana

sing

korn

80Co

olin

g to

wer

impr

ovem

ent

2016

331

16

733

116

781

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

20

1660

30

6030

82Ch

ange

Dist

iller

y sy

stem

from

dire

ct to

indi

rect

2016

1,

314

102

1,31

410

283

Inst

all 2

nd p

late

hea

t exc

hang

er20

16

1,0

01

771,

00

177

Kim

berly

-Cla

rk84

Chan

ge n

ew 2

air

com

pres

sors

2015

316

16

063

2

320

King

Mill

ing

(Sur

atth

ani)

85Pr

oduc

tivity

impr

ovem

ent :

redu

ce e

nerg

y us

age

2015

20

811

41

623

86Re

duce

leak

age

2016

1,05

8

535

1,05

8

535

87Re

duce

com

pres

sed

air w

orki

ng p

ress

ure

2016

350

17

735

0

177

88U

se b

oost

er d

evic

e at

the

high

pre

ssur

e w

ith

low

dem

and

proc

ess

2016

117

59

117

59

89In

stal

l seq

uenc

e co

ntro

ller

2016

899

45

489

9

454

90In

stal

l VSD

air

com

pres

sor

2016

95

4895

48

Kohl

er (T

haila

nd)

91M

aint

enan

ce a

ir-co

mpr

esso

r20

1510

1

5120

2

102

92Sw

itch

off l

ight

dur

ing

lunc

h br

eak

2015

246

12

449

2

249

93M

easu

re c

ombu

stio

n ef

ficie

ncy

at A

HU

Pla

nt

no. 1

-720

15

2,53

214

25,

064

284

94Pr

e-he

at th

e ai

r at P

lant

520

15

1,89

910

73,

798

213

95Re

duce

runn

ing

hour

s fr

om 13

hou

rs

to 1

1 ho

urs

2015

84

447

1,68

895

Krab

i veg

etab

le o

il96

Blow

dow

n ra

te re

duct

ion

2016

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

97Re

duce

leak

age

2016

77

3977

39

Kura

shik

i Sia

m R

ubbe

r98

Redu

ce in

let a

ir te

mpe

ratu

re20

1697

49

97

4999

Redu

ce c

ompr

esse

d ai

r wor

king

pre

ssur

e20

1682

42

82

4210

0Re

duce

pre

ssur

e se

t poi

nt o

n sh

ut d

own

perio

d20

1533

17

66

3310

1Re

duce

ele

ctric

al c

onsu

mpt

ion

of li

ghtin

g sy

stem

2015

1

0.3

82

1

51


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

LPN

Pla

te M

ill P

ublic

102

Redu

ce a

ir-co

nditi

oner

con

sum

ptio

n in

can

teen

2015

7

414

7

103

Redu

ce M

otor

Exh

aust

Blo

wer

usa

ge20

1566

34

132

67

104

Redu

ce e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n at

sta

rt-u

p re

heat

furn

ace

2015

2,

506

194

5,

012

388

105

Chan

ge n

ew m

etho

d to

con

trol

tem

pera

ture

at

ove

n20

15

41,7

593,

232

83

,518

6,46

4

106

chan

ge b

ulb

250

W to

LED

Low

Bay

150

W20

1563

32

126

63

Luck

y St

ar W

eavi

ng10

7Re

duce

ope

ratio

n tim

e of

Con

vers

ion

Mac

hine

2015

153

77

306

15

510

8Re

duce

com

pres

sed

air l

eaka

ge20

1513

5

6827

0

137

Map

Ta

Phut

Ole

fins

109

Redu

ce e

xces

s ai

r20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a M

C To

wa

Inte

rnat

iona

l Sw

eete

ners

110

Inst

alle

d VS

D c

ontr

olle

r20

1627

6

140

276

14

0

MSC

PR

Two

111

Use

7.5

kW

air

com

pres

sor f

or 3

7 kw

in

nig

ht ti

me

2015

56

2811

2

56

112

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

20

1511

6

22

11N

atio

nal S

tarc

h &

Che

mic

al11

3Fi

x th

e im

pelle

r pum

p (W

earin

g co

nditi

on)

2016

62

3162

31

Naw

arat

Pat

anak

arn

114

Redu

ce o

ffice

ele

ctric

al c

onsu

mpt

ion

2015

43

2286

43

New

Bio

dies

el11

5In

sula

tion

impr

ovem

ent

2016

4,

438

243

4,43

824

3

Nis

sen

Chem

itec

116

inst

all n

ew L

ED20

1521

4

108

428

21

611

7Ch

ange

to n

ew L

ED20

1563

32

126

63

NYC

Indu

srtr

y

118

Chan

ge H

ibay

to L

ED H

ibay

20

0W

2015

68

3513

6

6911

9Ch

ange

T8

46W

to In

duct

ion

Lam

p 12

0W

2015

2

14

2

120

Chan

ge F

lood

Lig

ht 4

00

W to

20

0W

2015

6

312

6

Oka

mot

o Te

xtile

121

Chan

ge 2

00

W to

120

W b

ulb

2015

5

310

5

122

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

18

Wat

t20

1561

9

313

1,23

8

625

123

Insu

latio

n im

prov

emen

t at p

lant

420

15

188

15

376

29

52


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Poly

foam

Kab

inbu

ri12

4Bl

owdo

wn

rate

redu

ctio

n20

15

n/a

n/a

n

/an/

a 12

5Im

prov

e In

sula

tion

2015

n/

a n/

a

n/a

n/a

12

6Fi

x St

eam

leak

s20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a 12

7Fi

x St

eam

trap

s20

15

n/a

n/a

n

/an/

a

Pram

uanp

hol

128

Inst

all V

SD a

ir co

mpr

esso

r20

1615

8

15

812

9Ch

ange

Flu

ores

cent

to L

ED

2015

99

5019

8

100

130

Ener

gy re

duct

ion

activ

ity a

t lun

ch b

reak

2015

134

68

268

13

5Pr

emiu

m F

oods

131

Ener

gy re

duct

ion

in c

ompr

esse

d ai

r sys

tem

2015

86

4317

2

87

Prim

e Pr

oduc

t Ind

ustr

y13

2Ch

ange

fuel

from

LPG

to B

iom

ass

2015

2,

827

178

05,

654

357

133

Redu

ce e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n of

Hig

hbay

ligh

ting

2016

31

1531

15

PTT

Glo

bal C

hem

ical

(P

lant

2)

134

Repa

ir In

stru

men

t air

leak

age

2014

175

88

525

26

513

5A-

110

A/B

oper

atin

g tim

e op

timiz

atio

n20

1411

9

6035

7

180

136

P-20

5 Im

pelle

r coa

ting

2014

17

851

25

137

Blow

dow

n ra

te re

duct

ion

2016

4

0.2

2

40

.22

138

chan

ge n

ew ty

pe o

f air

com

pres

sor

2016

552

27

955

2

279

139

stop

A-0

301

2016

142

72

142

72

140

adju

st lo

ad C

-030

2,C-

088

1 du

ring

TRSD

2016

1

0.3

81

0

.38

PTT

Glo

bal C

hem

ical

(P

lant

4)

141

Add

BRS

Supp

ly -8

to -7

2016

80

4080

40

142

stop

A-0

201

and

A-02

21 in

TRS

per

iod

2016

1

0.3

81

0

.38

143

EPP-

stea

m-1

: Brin

g cr

ude

HX

to p

urify

at

T-1

704

by p

ass

thro

ugh

T-17

03

2016

26

615

26

615

144

Redu

ce e

xces

s ai

r20

16

n/a

n/a

n

/a n

/a

145

Flas

h st

eam

reco

very

2016

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

146

Cond

ensa

te re

cove

ry20

16

n/a

n/a

n

/a n

/aPT

T G

loba

l Che

mic

al

(Pla

nt 1

2)14

7ER

P-El

ec-1

:Cha

nge

new

type

of A

ir Co

mpr

esso

r20

1652

2

264

522

26

4

148

Redu

ce p

ower

con

sum

ptio

n at

refr

iger

atio

n un

it20

1626

3

133

263

13

3

53


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

149

Redu

ce N

G c

onsu

mpt

ion

at fl

are

2016

3,

329

187

3,

329

187

PTT

Phen

ol15

0Re

duce

Ste

am c

onsu

mpt

ion

at D

ipp

colu

mn

2016

6,

068

340

6,

068

340

15

1Fl

ash

stea

m re

cove

ry20

16

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a15

2Fi

x St

eam

leak

s20

16

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a

PTT

Rayo

ng G

as

Sepa

ratio

n Pl

ant

153

Redu

ce fl

owra

te b

y tr

im im

pelle

r20

1593

0

470

1,86

0

939

154

Opt

imiz

e pu

mpi

ng s

yste

m20

151,

290

65

22,

580

1,

303

155

Non

-Met

allic

Wea

r rin

g20

157

4

14

8Ru

ey T

ay F

ibre

Indu

stry

156

Chan

ge 3

6W fl

uore

scen

t @

100

uni

t20

1516

8

32

16

Saha

thai

Prin

ting

and

Pack

agin

g15

7Fi

x St

eam

leak

s20

15

141

28

215

8Ch

ange

fuel

from

Fue

l Oil

to L

PG20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a

Saha

viriy

a St

eel

Indu

strie

s

159

Redu

ce e

xces

s ai

r20

15n/

a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

160

Impr

ove

Insu

latio

n20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a16

1Fi

x St

eam

leak

s20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n

/a

Siam

Che

mic

al

Indu

stry

162

Redu

ce c

ompr

esse

d-ai

r lea

kage

2015

24

1248

24

163

Impr

ove

air-

cond

ition

er v

entil

atio

n20

1525

13

50

2516

4in

stal

l aut

omat

ic v

alve

2015

120

61

240

12

116

5Re

duce

chi

ller c

oolin

g w

ater

flow

2015

23

1246

24

166

Cont

rol c

oolin

g w

ater

flow

for p

rodu

ctio

n20

1528

7

145

574

29

016

7in

sula

tion

impr

ovem

ent a

t ho

t oil

and

Stea

m p

ipe

2015

14

58

29

016

168

Chan

ge n

ew B

urne

r of h

ot o

il he

ater

2015

77

243

1,

544

87Si

am C

oate

d Ab

rasi

ve16

9Co

nden

sate

reco

very

2016

25

014

25

014

Siam

Mits

ui P

TA17

0Tu

rn-o

ff o

ne p

ump

(Ove

r dem

and)

2016

282

14

228

2

142

Siam

Naw

aloh

a Fo

undr

y17

1im

prov

e ai

r-co

mpr

esso

r sys

tem

2016

40

2040

20

172

Set r

unni

ng o

rder

of a

ir co

mpr

esso

r to

mat

ch w

ith p

rodu

ctio

n de

man

d20

1523

3

118

466

23

6

Siam

Ste

el In

tern

atio

nal

173

Chan

ge m

ercu

ry li

ghtin

g to

Flu

ores

cent

lig

htin

g20

1551

26

102

51

54


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

174

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

20

152

1

4

217

5Tu

rn o

ff a

ir co

nditi

oner

at l

unch

bre

ak20

158

4

16

817

6ch

ange

to L

ED20

1510

5

20

1017

7In

stal

l Air

Knife

+ B

low

er

2015

88

4417

6

89Si

am Y

achi

yo17

8In

sula

te B

arel

inje

ctio

n m

achi

ne 2

20 to

n,

180

ton

2015

3

26

3

Sura

pon

Nic

hire

i Foo

d

179

Impr

ove

Air

supp

ly s

yste

m fo

r Pro

duct

ion1

2015

76

3815

2

7618

0Re

sche

dule

Air

Hou

sing

Uni

t on-

off t

ime

2015

37

1974

38

181

Adju

st c

ompr

esso

r of c

hille

r20

1518

9

36

1818

2Im

prov

e co

olin

g to

wer

/Con

dens

er s

yste

m20

1572

36

144

73

183

redu

ce s

team

leak

age

2015

1,

972

124

3,94

424

918

4Ch

ange

the

light

ing

syst

em to

LED

2015

171

86

342

17

3Su

rat T

hani

Bev

erag

e18

5In

sula

tion

impr

ovem

ent a

t boi

ler

2015

7

1

141

186

Hea

t pum

p20

15

520

40

1,0

4081

Sure

tex

187

Hea

t rec

over

y fr

om h

ot w

ater

2015

53

2710

6

54

188

cent

raliz

e al

l the

chi

llers

to m

ake

a co

mm

on

chill

er w

ater

sys

tem

2015

2,75

1

1,38

95,

502

2,

779

189

Impr

ovem

ent o

ven

insu

latio

n20

1524

12

48

25Th

ai D

aizo

Aer

osol

190

Redu

ce e

lect

rical

con

sum

ptio

n20

1515

1

7630

2

153

Thai

MM

A 19

1Re

duce

inle

t air

tem

pera

ture

2015

4

28

4

Thai

Sty

reni

cs19

2U

se h

igh

effic

ienc

y ai

r com

pres

sor

2015

0.2

5

0.13

0.5

0

0.2

6

Thai

Nip

pon

Rubb

er

Indu

stry

19

3Re

duce

exc

ess

air

2015

4

0.2

7

80

.54

194

Cond

ensa

te re

cove

ry20

15

482

30

964

61Th

ai P

olye

thyl

ene

195

Com

bine

HD

PE#4

/PP#

3 ai

r com

pres

sor s

yste

m20

161,

398

70

61,

398

70

6

Thai

Pol

yeth

ylen

e

Plan

t 1

196

Repl

ace

new

coo

ling

fan

(W-7

951A

,B)

2015

440

22

288

0

444

197

Com

bine

HD

PE#4

/PP#

3 ai

r com

pres

sor s

yste

m20

151,

398

70

62,

796

1,

412

198

Mod

ified

line

CW

at S

L co

oler

to re

duce

CW

us

age

2015

106

54

212

10

7

199

Opt

imiz

e C-

330

1 Lo

ad20

151,

242

62

72,

484

1,

255

55


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Thai

Pol

yeth

ylen

e Pl

ant 3

200

Sing

le s

lurr

y co

oler

of b

oth

reac

tors

H

100

0P

grad

e20

1566

33

132

66

201

Redu

ce te

mpe

ratu

re a

t eth

ylen

e pr

ehea

ter

(30

to 2

3 C)

2015

1,

00

456

.31

2,

00

811

3

202

Redu

ce re

flux

ratio

of d

istill

atio

n co

lum

nT-

570

3 (2

5 to

20

%)

2015

7,

830

439

15

,660

879

203

Redu

ce te

mp

ethy

lene

pre

heat

er

(from

30

to 2

3C)

2015

2

0.0

9

40

.18

204

Mas

s Co

lor

2015

2,90

7

1,46

85,

814

2,

936

Thai

Pol

yeth

ylen

e

Plan

t 7

205

C-50

2, C

-50

3A/B

Inst

all p

ress

ure

tran

smitt

er

(Suc

tion

Filte

r)20

1513

0

6626

0

131

206

VV

VF

to o

ptim

ize

elec

tric

al c

onsu

mpt

ion

for C

901

2015

73

3714

6

74

207

Redu

ce p

ower

con

sum

ptio

n by

pum

p co

atin

g (P

130

0A/

B/C)

2015

95

4819

0

96

208

C-25

02, C

-250

3A/B

Inst

all p

ress

ure

tran

smitt

er (S

uctio

n Fi

lter)

2015

142

72

284

14

3

209

VV

VF

to o

ptim

ize

elec

tric

al c

onsu

mpt

ion

for C

290

120

1595

48

190

96

210

Incr

ease

LS

flash

ste

am fr

om D

851

from

mod

ifica

tion

2015

2,

211

124

4,

422

248

211

Redu

ce S

team

con

sum

ptio

n of

deg

assi

ng p

urge

ai

r hea

ter b

y us

ing

ambi

ent t

empe

ratu

re

purg

e ai

r par

t red

uce

time

hot p

urge

2015

31

318

62

635

Thai

Rua

m Ja

i Kor

at

212

Redu

ce e

xces

s ai

r20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n

/a21

3Bl

owdo

wn

rate

redu

ctio

n20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n/

a21

4Im

prov

e In

sula

tion

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

215

Cond

ensa

te re

cove

ry20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n/

a21

6Pr

e-he

at a

ir be

fore

sup

ply

to c

ombu

stio

n ch

ambe

r20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n/

a

217

Redu

ce s

trea

m p

ress

ure

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

218

Fine

tune

%O

2 20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

a n/

a

56


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

Thai

Sili

cate

Che

mic

al21

9Re

duce

Nat

ural

gas

at F

urna

ce E

and

F

2016

3

0.3

3

0.3

220

Redu

ce N

atur

al g

as a

t Dry

ing

Proc

ess

2016

68

438

68

438

Thai

Tak

eda

Lace

(131

31)

221

Chan

ge to

LED

18

wat

t @1,

100

uni

t20

1574

37

148

75

Thai

Tak

eda

Lace

(139

99)

222

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

20

1530

4

153

608

30

7Th

ai T

oray

Syn

thet

ics

223

Impr

ove

com

pres

sor a

nd c

oolin

g to

wer

of

chi

ller

2015

350

17

770

0

354

224

Inst

all S

olar

cel

l 10

kw

p +

Chan

ge

to L

ED 1

8 w

att b

ulb

2015

9

518

9

225

Chan

ge F

luor

esce

nt to

LED

20

1511

0

5522

0

111

226

Redu

ce s

uctio

n pr

essu

re to

Com

pres

sor

2015

262

13

252

4

265

227

Inst

all C

hille

r aut

omat

ic c

ontr

ol20

151,

975

99

83,

950

1,

996

228

Ball

clea

ning

2015

47

2494

48

Thai

Uni

on F

roze

n Pr

oduc

ts22

9Ch

ange

to L

ED 2

0W

Pla

nt F

ish 2

2015

262

13

252

4

265

230

Inst

all H

ibay

LED

150

W20

1518

9

36

18

231

Boos

ter p

ump

SCM

2015

891

45

01,

782

90

0

Thai

Uni

ted

Awa

Pape

r

232

Blow

dow

n ra

te re

duct

ion

2016

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

233

Cond

ensa

te re

cove

ry20

16

n/a

n/a

n

/an/

a23

4Re

duce

inle

t air

tem

pera

ture

2016

n/a

n/

an/

an/

a23

5Re

duce

com

pres

sed

air w

orki

ng p

ress

ure

2016

n/a

n/

an/

a

n/a

236

Use

hig

h ef

ficie

ncy

air c

ompr

esso

r20

16 n

/a

n/a

n/a

n/

a23

7In

stal

l VSD

air

com

pres

sor

2016

n/a

n/

an/

a

n/a

Thai

food

s G

roup

238

Chan

ge T

8 to

LED

14 W

2015

159

80

318

16

123

9W

ashi

ng m

achi

ne c

hang

e en

ergy

sou

rce

from

el

ectr

icity

to s

team

and

Clo

thes

dry

ers

from

G

as to

Ste

am

2015

58

3

116

6

Thai

-Ger

man

Cer

amic

In

dust

ry24

0In

stal

led

VSD

con

trol

ler

2015

135

68

270

13

7

241

Inst

all n

ew h

igh

effic

ienc

y H

eat E

xcha

nger

20

15

1,24

797

2,

494

193

Than

apak

di24

2Fi

x St

eam

Tap

and

cha

nge

new

By

Pass

val

ve20

15

857

17

013

243

Cond

ensa

te re

cove

ry20

15

400

31

800

62

57


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

The

Siam

Con

stru

ctio

n St

eel

244

Redu

ce w

ater

con

sum

ptio

n20

151,

00

0

505

2,0

00

1,

010

245

Redu

ce le

akag

e20

1540

5

205

810

41

024

6Re

duce

inle

t air

tem

pera

ture

2015

23

1246

24

247

Redu

ce w

orki

ng h

ours

of M

illin

g m

achi

ne20

1519

2

9738

4

194

248

Inst

all t

imer

to tu

rn-o

n an

d tu

rn-o

ff

elec

tric

al H

eate

r cla

mp

2015

26

1352

27

249

Canc

el a

tran

sfor

mer

50

0 K

VA

2015

11

622

11

Tipc

o As

phal

t25

0Ch

ange

ligh

ting

syst

em fr

om 3

Uni

ts

to 2

Uni

ts (3

6W e

ach)

2015

4

28

4

251

Inst

all n

ew a

ir co

nditi

oner

tota

l 16

units

2015

40

2080

41

252

Redu

ce ru

nnin

g ho

urs

of m

illin

g m

achi

ne20

15

399

310

798

62

Toka

i Eas

tern

Rub

ber

(Tha

iland

)25

3Ch

ang

stre

et li

ght t

o LE

D

2015

18

936

18

254

Chan

g to

LED

bul

b20

1521

2

107

424

21

5

TPI P

olen

e

255

Fix

Expa

nsio

n Jo

int a

nd c

rack

ed tu

be

at T

ertia

ry a

ir du

ct 1

2016

14

1,48

113

,384

14

1,48

113

,384

256

Fix

Expa

nsio

n Jo

int a

nd c

rack

ed tu

be

at T

ertia

ry a

ir du

ct 2

2016

15

3,0

3414

,477

15

3,0

3414

,477

257

Fix

Expa

nsio

n Jo

int a

nd c

rack

ed tu

be

at T

ertia

ry a

ir du

ct 3

2016

16

1,32

615

,262

16

1,32

615

,262

U.R

. Che

mic

al25

8Re

duce

leak

age

2015

10

520

10

259

Cont

rol b

low

dow

n ra

te o

f air

drye

r20

150

.22

0

.110

.44

0

.22

Uen

o Fi

ne C

hem

ical

s In

dust

ry26

0Ch

ange

to h

igh

effic

ienc

y m

otor

s20

1672

36

72

3626

1Ch

ange

Flu

ores

cent

to L

ED

2016

83

4283

42

Uni

ted

Farm

er

& In

dust

ry26

2Co

ntro

l pro

duct

ion

proc

ess

23 k

Wh/

Tc20

162,

450

1,

238

2,45

0

1,23

8

Uni

ted

Win

ery

and

Dist

iller

y26

3Co

nden

sate

reco

very

2016

64

219

60

642

196

264

Redu

ce le

akag

e20

1638

19

38

19U

SAM

Inte

r gro

up26

5U

se b

oost

er d

evic

e at

the

high

pre

ssur

e w

ith lo

w d

eman

d pr

oces

s20

1612

6

12

6

58


Fact

ory

No.

Imp

lem

ente

d m

easu

res

Year

En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 /

yr)

Tota

l En

erg

y sa

vin

gs

Tota

l GH

G

Red

uct

ion

(to

n C

O2 )

Sta

rtM

Wh

/yr

GJ/

Yr

MW

hG

J

266

Inst

all r

ing-

loop

pip

e20

1680

41

80

4126

7Re

duce

exc

ess

air

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

268

Blow

dow

n ra

te re

duct

ion

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

Uto

pian

269

Impr

ove

Insu

latio

n20

15

n/a

n/a

n/

an/

a 27

0Co

nden

sate

reco

very

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

271

Fix

Stea

m le

aks

2015

n/

an/

a

n/a

n/a

272

Fix

Stea

m tr

aps

2015

n/

a n

/a

n/a

n/a

Y.T.

Rubb

er

273

Impr

ove

Was

te W

ater

Tre

atm

ent P

lant

El

ectr

ical

Con

sum

ptio

n20

1540

20

80

41

274

Redu

ce fr

ee-r

un o

f mac

hine

2015

101

51

202

10

227

5Im

prov

e lig

htin

g co

ntro

l20

1511

6

22

1127

6Ad

just

con

trol

val

ve a

t Bur

ner o

f Dry

er20

15

1,66

310

5

3,32

621

0To

tal

39,8

7477

7,33

683

,019

65,1

4185

0,3

5010

1,0

23

Rem

ark:

1. Th

e fa

ctor

y pe

rson

nel a

tten

ded

the

2-da

y us

er tr

aini

ngs

and

appl

ied

the

know

ledg

e to

impr

ove

thei

r ene

rgy

usag

e.

2. n

/a =

not

ava

ilabl

e. T

he c

ompa

ny d

escr

ibed

wha

t the

y ha

ve d

one

to im

prov

e en

ergy

effi

cien

cy, b

ut th

ey d

id n

ot p

rovi

de th

e qu

antit

ativ

e da

ta fo

r cal

cula

tion.

n/c

= no

t cou

nt.

The

com

pany

impl

emen

ted

ener

gy e

ffici

ency

mea

sure

s in

20

17. T

here

fore

, the

sav

ings

per

yea

r are

sho

wn,

but

the

tota

l sav

ings

are

not

cou

nted

.

3. T

he c

alcu

latio

n of

the

redu

ctio

n of

GH

G e

mis

sion

use

the

follo

win

g co

-effi

cien

t.

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r grid

ele

ctric

ity

: 0

.505

1 tC

O2 /

MW

h

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r fue

l oil

: 77

.4

tCO

2 /TJ

–

Emis

sion

s Fa

ctor

for c

oal

: 94

.6

tCO

2 /TJ

–

Emis

sion

s Fa

ctor

for n

atur

al g

as

: 56

.1 tC

O2 /

TJ

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r LPG

:

61.2

tC

O2 /

TJ

– Em

issi

ons

Fact

or fo

r Bio

mas

s

: 0

.693

tC

O2 /

ton

4. T

he d

urat

ion

for G

HG

redu

ctio

n ca

lcul

atio

n is

from

the

impl

emen

ting

year

to th

e en

d of

pro

ject

(20

17).

For e

xam

ple,

a m

easu

re im

plem

ente

d in

20

15 w

ould

be

cons

ider

ed

fo

r 2 y

ears

of d

irect

impa

ct d

urin

g th

e IE

E pr

ojec

t im

plem

enta

tion.

It h

as b

een

assu

med

that

the

savi

ng w

ould

be

cons

erva

tivel

y co

unte

d fo

r 20

16 a

nd 2

017

.

59

Annex ECapacity Building Program

Annex E

Capacity Building Program

60


E.1 Original Workshop and Training Program

Originally, the capacity building program was designed to provide training/workshops for five categories as illustrated in Figure e.1.

Figure e.1 Original design of capacity building program

The detail of each training/workshop is described below.

0.5-day awareness workshop

Objective: awareness raisingMain target: factory management (in target sectors)Other targets: factory personnel, consultants, government officers, researchers, lecturers, equipment vendors/suppliers, service providers, and ESCOsInstructor: international experts (for the first few workshops) and national expertsContent: overview of energy management system (ISO 50001) and introduction of system optimizationTraining time: 0.5 day

0.5-day training for vendor/supplier

Objective: provide overview of system optimization (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system)Main target: equipment vendors/suppliers, service providers, and ESCOsInstructor: international experts Content: overview of system optimization (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system)

1.5-day training for bank personnel

Objective: enhance the understanding of the bank personnel on energy efficiency measuresMain target: bank personnelInstructor: Thai expertsContent: basic information about energy systems and energy efficiency measures, site visit to the Energy Efficiency Demonstration Building

61


2-day user training on EnMS

Objective: support the factory intending to implement EnMS Main target: factory personnel (in target sectors)Other targets: consultants, government officers, researchers, lecturers, CBsInstructor: international experts (for the first few workshops) and national expertsContent: step-by-step on how to implement EnMS

2-day user training on SO

Objective: provide the SO self-assessment basic and best practices to improve the systemMain target: factory personnel (in target sectors)Other targets: consultants, government officers, researchers, lecturers, equipment vendors/suppliers, service providers, and ESCOsInstructor: international experts (for the first few workshops) and national expertsContent: Fundamental of system approach and how to assess the system (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system)

2-day training on Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for industries

Objective: provide the information of EE related financial loan available and guide the factory personnel on the bankable financial proposal developmentMain target: factory personnel (in target sectors)Instructor: Local experts Content: EE related financial loan in Thailand, underwriting process, and step-by-step on how to prepare the bankable financial proposal

Expert training on EnMS

Objective: train experts who can support the factory to implement EnMS in the future and be the national trainers for the project Main target: consultants, certification body (CB), factory personnelOther targets: government officersInstructor: international expertsContent: advance EnMS course divided into 3 modules (3-4 days/modules) at the interval of 3-4 months, and the on-the-job training with host facilities under the international experts’ supervision

Expert training on SO

Objective: train experts who can conduct the SO assessment and be the national trainers for the projectMain target: consultants, equipment vendors/service providers, ESCOsOther targets: government officersInstructor: international expertsContent: advance SO assessment (steam, compressed air, pumping and fan system) and the individual assessment with host facilities under the international experts’ supervision

62


E.2 Modification of Workshop and Training Program

After conducting several trainings and workshops, the feedback from the participants were analyzed. The gap analysis of the original capacity building program found that:

- The participants of the awareness workshops would like to learn from other factories that have successfully implemented EnMS.

- The CB participants of 2-day EnMS training would like to learn more about technical parts of EnMS such as energy review, energy performance indicators, baseline setup, and the fundamentals of basic utilities in the factory. It would ensure that the CB would learn about the basic energy perspectives of EnMS and have common understanding of the technical clauses in the standard.

- In addition to the EnMS, TISI officers who act as Accreditation Body would like to learn about the transition of EnMS and lessons learned from other countries.

- There is a technical gap between the user and expert training. The user training offers the fundamentals of EnMS and SO by emphasizing the techniques that can be applied on site, while the expert training provides more in-depth technical knowledge, hands-on exercises, and the practice in host factories. There is a need for a more technically-oriented course than the typical user training requested by the factory personnel, consultants, CB, and equipment/service providers; however, they did not have enough time to attend a long training like the expert training.

- One of the feedbacks from the expert training participants is the long training period. The project has taken note of the dropout rate of the EnMS expert training’s participants. 8% of the total participants or 7 persons could not finish the 3 training modules within the 10-month duration.

- Some potential candidates hesitate to participate in the expert training because they were afraid of failing the exam. There is a significant rate of absence to attend the examination, 15% for EnMS expert training and 24% for SO expert training. Moreover, the rate of SO participants of the 1st batch who failed the exam is quite high at 33%. This makes it more difficult to convince the participants of the 2nd batch to partake in the examination.

- The 0.5-day vendor training presents too basic content in the suppliers’/vendors’ perspective. There is a request to provide more technical content, by for example using the SSAT program during the vendor training.

- The factory personnel who attended a 2-day user training would like to learn more technical details, but did not want to attend the full expert training due to too long training period.

Based on the above feedback and analysis, the project has revised two existing trainings and designed 6 new training courses as described below.

- Revised awareness workshop: The discussion panel with the representatives from host facilities was added in the afternoon session to make it almost a 1-day workshop. In some workshops where the host facility’s representative could not attend, the records of his or her experience were sharing with the participants.

- Revised vendor training: The 2-day user training material was revised integrating some parts of the expert training to become the new course content for the vendor training. The training was 1.5 day with an additional 2-hour brainstorming session.

- CB training: CB training was developed as a technically-oriented course for CBs who were familiar with ISO standards, but did not have a strong background on energy systems. The 2-day training provided the information of some common utilities and their performance indicators such as boiler, compressed air, pump, chiller and air conditioning unit. The participants also learned about the energy review and baseline generation using regression analysis. The exercises and case studies were used to ensure that the participants could do the simple calculation themselves. TISI officers were also invited to join this training.

63


- AB training: The transition of ISO 50001 and other related issues were explained and discussed during this 1-day training.

- EnMS intensive training: The intensive training is a 4-days training in 2 months intervals for the shorter version of expert training and case-based exercises. The training was catered to factory personnel who wanted to learn and practice more on EnMS implementation. Some consultants and CBs who missed the expert training also joined the intensive training. The examination was provided on a voluntary basis for the participants who wanted to get the certificate of completion.

- SSO technical training: The SSO technical training was a combination of a 2-hour webinar as a pre-requisite and a 2-day classroom training focused on the technical analysis and case-based exercises with equipment demonstration. The examination was provided on a voluntary basis for the participants who wanted to get the certificate of completion.

- CASO technical training: The CASO technical training was a combination of a 2-hour webinar as a pre-requisite and a 2-day classroom training focused on the technical analysis and case-based exercises with equipment demonstration. The examination was provided on a voluntary basis for the participants who wanted to get the certificate of completion.

- Biomass boiler’s operators training: During the study of biomass boiler and its steam system improvement, the project found that the biomass boilers’ efficiency could be improved by changing the practice of the biomass operators. The operators highly influence the efficiency of biomass boilers by simple operations such as closing the opening of the boiler and maintaining good housekeeping for biomass storage. However, operators have limited access to the training course since most of the courses targeted engineers and focused on theory and calculation. Therefore, the project designed a new training course for biomass boilers’ operators. This 2-day training focused on the good practice of biomass boiler operation, improvement measures, and demonstration of simple measurements to calculate boilers efficiency.

These revised and newly developed courses reflected the flexibility of the program and continuous improvement of the program itself to fulfill the stakeholders’ needs and to close the loop of the supply chain for improving the efficiency of energy usage in the industry.

64


E. 3 Training Materials and Tools

The list of training materials and tools in the project is shown in Table e.1.

Table e.1 List of training materials and tools

Training Materials and Tools Language

1. Awareness Raising

1.1 Presentation

1.1.1 A new day in energy management English, Thai

2. Energy Management System

2.1 Presentation

2.1.1 EnMS 2-day user training English, Thai

2.1.2 Expert training (3 modules) English

2.1.3 CB training English

2.1.4 AB training English

2.1.5 Intensive training presentation English

2.2 Guideline

2.2.1 Energy management system implementation English, Thai

2.3 Tools

2.3.1 EnMS tool English, Thai

3. System Optimization

3.1 Presentation

3.1.1 SSO 2-day user training English, Thai

3.1.2 CASO 2-day user training English, Thai

3.1.3 PSO 2-day user training English, Thai

3.1.4 FSO 2-day user training English, Thai

3.1.5 SSO technical training English

3.1.6 CASO technical training English

3.1.7 Biomass boiler’s operator training Thai

3.2 Guideline

3.2.1 SSO guideline for user training English, Thai

3.2.2 CASO guideline for user training English, Thai

3.2.3 PSO guideline for user training English, Thai

3.2.4 FSO guideline for user training English, Thai

3.2.5 SSO guideline for expert training English

3.2.6 CASO guideline for expert training English

3.2.7 PSO guideline for expert training English

3.2.8 FSO guideline for expert training English

65


Training Materials and Tools Language

3.3 Tools

3.3.1 Steam System Scoping Tool (SSST)(Permission from Us DoE for UNIDO to translate to Thai)

English, Thai

3.3.2 Steam System Assessment Tool (SSAT) English

3.3.3 Pumping System Assessment Tool (PSAT) English

3.3.4 Fan System Assessment Tool (FSAT) English

4. Financing Energy Efficiency Project

4.1 Presentation

4.1.1 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for financial institutes English, Thai

4.1.2 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for industries English, Thai

4.2 Guideline

4.2.1 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for financial institutes English, Thai

4.2.2 Evaluation of industrial energy efficiency project for industries English, Thai

66


E.4 Details of the Awareness Workshops

The details of the awareness workshops is shown in Table e.2.

Table e.2 List of awareness workshops (Target in project document = 500 factory managers)

No. Date Location No. of participants Gender No. of factory

Management Personnel Other Female Male

1 10 Jul 12 Bangkok 16 19 77 24 88 24

2 10 Sep 12 Bangkok 14 16 9 6 33 18

3 25 Sep 13 Bangkok 26 26 23 18 57 28

4 6 Nov 13 Nakhon Ratchasima 13 39 42 8 86 25

5 20 Nov 13 Kanchanaburi 26 44 18 16 72 33

6 27 Nov 13 Rayong 39 52 6 20 77 47

7 15 Sep 14 Khon Kaen 29 2 9 2 38 16

8 29 Sep 14 Songkhla 33 5 6 7 37 21

9 8 Oct 14 Ayutthaya 45 2 20 12 55 19

10 13 Oct 14 Bangkok 64 7 56 15 112 49

11 17 Oct 14 Samut Sakhon 60 3 8 11 60 36

12 26 Jun 15 Prachin Buri 30 22 9 12 49 27

13 23 Jul 15 Ratchaburi 39 22 3 8 56 36

14 27 Aug 15 Surat Thani 22 16 4 6 36 25

15 2 Oct 15 Chiang Mai 32 36 0 12 56 32

16 3 Feb 16 Bangkok 50 29 10 13 76 47

17 7 Apr 16 Nakhon Si Thammarat 38 30 0 18 50 38

18 20 Apr 16 Chonburi 28 34 8 21 49 41

Total 604 404 308 229 1,087

67


E.5 Detail of the EnMS User Training

The details of the EnMS 2-day user training is shown in Table e.3.

Table e.3 List of EnMS 2-day user training (Target in project document = 300 target factories)

No. Date Location No. of participants Gender No. of factory

Target industries

Other Female Male

1 12-13 Jul 12 Bangkok 44 71 30 85 23

2 3-4 Sep 12 Bangkok 58 25 13 70 29

3 18-19 Feb 13 Bangkok 33 20 14 39 18

4 3-4 Jun 13 Chon Buri 54 2 13 43 29

5 26-27 Sep 13 Bangkok 48 12 16 44 23

6 26-27 Feb 14 Bangkok 20 35 13 42 10

7 11-12 Mar 14 Bangkok 22 31 20 33 8

8 14-15 May 14 Rayong 27 28 14 41 11

9 23-24 Jul 14 Bangkok 14 37 15 36 3

10 10-11 Sep 14 Bangkok 11 45 12 44 9

11 24-25 Nov 14 Bangkok 5 16 9 12 5

12 14-15 Jan 15 Bangkok 21 22 14 29 10

13 20-21 May 15 Bangkok 4 34 9 29 4

14 25-26 Jun 15 Nakhon Ratchasima 81 7 17 71 40

15 15-16 Jul 15 Surat Thani 75 13 14 74 39

16 5-6 Aug 15 Bangkok 10 29 11 28 5

17 17-18 Sep 15 Prachin Buri 60 11 11 60 30

18 15-16 Oct 15 Chiang Mai 66 14 20 60 38

19 17-18 Dec 15 Bangkok 28 21 13 36 13

20 17-18 Feb 16 Bangkok 29 23 9 43 16

21 16-17 Mar 16 Ayutthaya 59 2 18 43 28

22 14-15 Jun 16 Bangkok 11 41 14 38 9

23 15-16 Nov 16 Bangkok 7 11 10 8 5

24 15-16 Feb 17 Bangkok 9 4 4 9 6

Total 796 554 333 1,017

68


E.6 Detail of the SO User Training

The details of the SO 2-day user training is shown in Table e.4.

Table e.4 List of SO 2-day user training (Target in project document = 400 factory personnel)

No. Date System Location No. of participants Gender No. of factory

Target industries

Other Female Male

1 31 Jul-1 Aug 12 SSO Bangkok 20 13 2 31 10

2 2-3 Oct 12 PSO Bangkok 29 29 9 49 16

3 6-7 Nov 12 SSO Rayong 35 13 8 40 20

4 27-28 Nov 12 CASO Bangkok 40 35 8 67 28

5 18-19 Mar 13 PSO Bangkok 27 20 4 43 16

6 22-23 Apr 13 SSO Bangkok 17 14 2 29 11

7 20-21 May 13 PSO Ayuthaya 17 6 5 18 5

8 17-18 Jun 13 CASO Bangkok 56 15 3 68 28

9 30-31 Oct 13 SSO Bangkok 46 9 5 50 26

10 17-18 Feb 14 CASO Bangkok 41 14 8 47 26

11 22-23 Apr 14 SSO Bangkok 20 23 5 38 13

12 17-18 Jun 14 CASO Bangkok 19 50 9 60 11

13 1-2 Jul 14 PSO Rayong 52 26 2 76 29

14 21-22 Jul 14 SSO Samut Prakan 33 5 4 34 13

15 28-29 Oct 14 CASO Samut Prakan 72 5 5 72 38

16 2-3 Dec 14 PSO Samut Sakhon 52 3 7 48 26

17 11-12 Dec 14 SSO Bangkok 34 17 3 48 18

18 24-25 Feb 15 FSO Bangkok 9 32 3 38 5

19 2-3 Jun 15 FSO Bangkok 24 17 3 38 13

20 21-22 Sep 15 SSO Chonburi 25 3 2 26 14

21 24-25 Sep 15 CASO Rayong 40 3 2 41 22

22 29-30 Sep 15 PSO Bangkok 30 22 3 49 18

23 11-12 Feb 16 PSO Bangkok 53 13 7 59 18

24 18-19 Feb 16 FSO Bangkok 30 9 4 35 17

25 25-26 Feb 16 SSO Krabi 65 26 13 78 30

26 7-8 Mar 16 CASO Bangkok 47 20 7 60 21

27 12-13 May 16 SSO Samut Prakan 39 16 6 49 17

28 16-17 May 16 CASO Samut Prakan 26 13 5 34 9

29 31 May-1 Jun 16 PSO Bangkok 37 11 6 42 16

30 9-10 Jun 16 SSO Samut Prakan 35 9 1 43 18

31 14-15 Jun 16 CASO Bangkok 56 4 2 58 29

Total 1,126 495 153 1,468

69


E.7 National Experts on EnMS

Table e.5 List of qualified national experts on EnMS

No. Name Status

1 Miss Ajchamapun Kirdsawas Factory personnel

2 Mr. Atthapong Laiudomsin Consultant

3 Miss Bussaba Saelim Government officer

4 Mr. Chakrit Jarrusbussarakam Factory personnel

5 Mr. Chirasak Boonrowd Consultant

6 Mr. Chokchai Anamtawach Consultant

7 Dr. Chonlakarn Wongkhorsub* Consultant

8 Mr. Ekachai Boonchana Factory personnel

9 Mr. Gowit Uttaboon Factory personnel

10 Mr. Jakkarin Nakrai Consultant

11 Ms. Kanchanit Lakhakoon Factory personnel

12 Ms. Kanokkan Imjai Consultant

13 Mr. Kitsanapong Laiuksorn Consultant

14 Mr. Kosid Keawtao Consultant

15 Ms. Manchima Chatsrirung Consultant

16 Miss Nadnicha Sangkate Consultant

17 Ms. Nadtaya Sirisomboon Factory personnel

18 Mr. Nahtorn Arunphu Consultant

19 Mr. Nattapong Thipayawat Factory personnel

20 Mr. Natthapong Suwanasang Government officer

21 Dr. Nopporn Patcharaprakiti Consultant

22 Mr. Nopwarin Duangdee Factory personnel

23 Mr. Nueng Klubtavee Consultant

24 Mr. Paisan Jiranuntarat Consultant

25 Mr. Paisarn Khongphasarnkaln Consultant

26 Dr. Paitoon Temsinvanich* Consultant

27 Miss Pakawan Kamonchaivanich Factory personnel

28 Mr. Pasakorn Thungkanont Consultant

29 Miss Phanida Chalangsut Consultant

30 Mr. Phongjaroon Srisovanna Consultant

31 Mr. Phooben Phunwesh Consultant

32 Mr. Pisit Pitayacharoenwong* Consultant

33 Dr. Pisit Yongyingsakthavorn Consultant

34 Mr. Pitoon Junthip* Consultant

35 Ms. Prarudee Donmok Factory personnel

70


No. Name Status

36 Mr. Raththa Sricharoen Government officer

37 Dr. Sadudee Supanpai Factory personnel

38 Miss Saipin Tuansawad Consultant

39 Mr. Saran Prabpairin Consultant

40 Mr. Saravut Phayoongtham* Consultant

41 Mr. Sarun Udakarn Government officer

42 Mr. Singhanart Mettakhun* Consultant

43 Mr. Siravit Laocharoenpongsang Factory personnel

44 Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul* Consultant

45 Mr. Somchai Pongsaran Consultant

46 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien Consultant

47 Mr. Suporn Kulwattanantachai Consultant

48 Mr. Suradech Phattaravichien Consultant

49 Dr. Sutavadee Techajunta Government officer

50 Mr. Suthat Rattanasakulchon Factory personnel

51 Mr. Sutipong Nakavidhaya Government officer

52 Miss Suwimol Krisanasuwan Government officer

53 Mr. Terapong Samot Factory personnel

54 Dr. Thanakom Soontornchainacksaeng Consultant

55 Mr. Thanakrit Wangdumrongwong Consultant

56 Mr. Thapakon Mokkaraphan Factory personnel

57 Mr. Thirayu Chaiyasit Factory personnel

58 Mr. Viboolpong Angkhala Factory personnel

59 Mr. Wichein Phachayamai Consultant

60 Miss Witchar Pichainarong Government officer

61 Mr. Woraphot Rattanasaengsakulthai Consultant

62 Mr. Yostana Jintamakul Consultant

Note: * = National trainer

71


E.8 National Experts on SO

Table e.6 List of qualified national experts on SO

No. Name Status

Steam System

1 Mr. Ampol Somboonphokaphan Project engineer

2 Dr. Atikorn Wongsatanawarid* Consultant


4 Mr. Khongsit Apiwong Consultant


6 Mr. Manit Koothanapath Consultant

7 Mr. Nueng klubtavee* Consultant

8 Dr. Paitoon Temsinvanich Consultant


10 Mr. Preecha Preedavichit Consultant

11 Mr. Rawit Thaweesub* Consultant

12 Mr. Sayan Pansang Consultant

13 Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul* Consultant

14 Dr. Surachai Sanitjai* Consultant

15 Dr. Wasan Yoksenakul* Consultant

16 Miss Wipawan Thammachataree Consultant


Compressed Air System

18 Dr. Jaytawee Pukrushpan Consultant


20 Mr. Kitsanapong Laiuksorn Consultant

21 Mr. Kran Rakchareon* Consultant


23 Miss Nadtaya Sirsomboon Factory personnel

24 Mr. Nueng klubtavee Consultant

25 Dr. Paitoon Temsinvanich* Consultant

26 Mr. Pasakorn Thungkanont Consultant

27 Mr. Phai Sornsakda Factory personnel


29 Mr. Tanatid Pongpit Factory personnel

30 Mr. Pisit Pitayacharoenwong Consultant

31 Dr. Pisit Yongyingsakthavorn Consultant

32 Dr. Somchai Dechapanichkul Consultant

33 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien* Consultant

72


No. Name Status

34 Mr. Viboolpong Aungkhala Factory personnel

35 Miss Wanlapa Charoonthum Consultant


37 Mr. Yongyuth Sroimori Consultant

Pumping System



40 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien* Consultant

41 Miss Umpawan Pongsittisak Consultant

42 Dr. Wasan Yoksenakul* Consultant

Fan System

43 Mr. Ampol Somboonphokaphan Project engineer

44 Mr. Nuttawut Chuenarom Project engineer

45 Mr. Pisit Pitayacharoenwong Consultant



48 Mr. Suchai Pongpakpien Consultant

Note: * = National trainer

73

Annex FFactories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization

Annex F

Factories Implementing EnMS and System Optimization

74


F.1 Factories Implementing EnMs with TISI’s and IEE Project’s Support

Table f.1 List of factories implementing EnMS

No. Factory Province Sector Supporting Channel

National Expert

Certified ISO 50001

1 Royal Can Industries Samut Sakhon Rubber and plastic

Expert training NE’s team

2 PTT Global Chemical Rayong Chemical Expert training NE’s team

3 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Nongjok

Bangkok Food and beverage


4 Sura Bangyikhan Pathum Thani Food and beverage


5 Aeoflex Rayong Rubber and plastic


6 Beer Thip Brewery (1991) Ayutthaya Food and beverage


7 Eastern Polypack Rayong Rubber and plastic


8 Fueng Fu Anant Prachin Buri Food and beverage


9 Tong Siang Samut Sakhon Textiles Expert training NE’s team

10 Thai Cold Rolled Steel Sheet (TCRSS)

Prachuap Khiri Khan

Basic metal TLC

Dr.Somchai

11 Thai MFC Rayong Chemical TLC Pitoon

12 Thai Pet Resin Rayong Chemical TLC Pitoon

13 Theppadungporn Coconut Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage

TLC Dr.Somchai

14 Leed Feed Mill, Saraburi Saraburi Food and beverage

TLC Dr.Somchai

15 Siam Mitsui PTA Rayong Chemical TLC Pitoon

16 Siam United Steel Rayong Basic metal TLC Pitoon

17 Thai Pigeon Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic

TLC Dr.Somchai

18 Thai MMA – MMA Plant Rayong Chemical Support program Chokchai

19 Thai MMA – CCS Plant Rayong Chemical Support program Chokchai

20 Cerebos (Thailand) – Lamchabang Chon Buri Food and beverage

Support program Dr.Somchai

21 Cerebos (Thailand) – Pinthong Chon Buri Food and beverage


22 Innolatex (Thailand) Songkhla Rubber and plastic

Support program Saravut

75



National Expert

23 Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Chon Buri Rubber and plastic

Support program Paitoon

24 The Government Pharmaceutical Organization

Pathum Thani Chemical Support program Saravut

25 Lee Feed Mill, Phetchaburi Petchaburi Food and beverage


EnMS in placed

26 Sahaviriya Steel Industries Prachuap Khiri Khan

Basic metal Expert training NE’s team

27 Sahaviriya Plate Mill Chachoengsao Basic metal Expert training NE’s team

28 CP-Meiji Saraburi Food and beverage


29 Khao C.P. (Wang Dang) Ayutthaya Food and beverage


30 Kulwong Pathum Thani Chemical Expert training NE’s team

31 Red Bull Distillery (1988) Samut Sakhon Food and beverage


32 TPI Polene Saraburi Non-metallic Expert training NE’s team

33 British Dispensary (L.P.) Samut Prakan Chemical TLC Dr.Somchai

34 Mahaphant Fiber Cement Lop Buri Non-metallic TLC Dr.Somchai

35 Thai Silicate Chemical Chon Buri Chemical TLC Pitoon

36 Wiik and Hoeglund Chon Buri Rubber and Plastic

TLC Pitoon

37 Thainitrate Rayong Chemical TLC Kosit

38 Ferro (Thailand) Saraburi Chemical TLC Dr.Somchai

39 Tep Kinsho Foods Samut Sakhon Food and beverage

Support program Wichien

40 Thai Ruam Jai Korat Nakhon Ratchasima

Food and beverage

Support program Wichien

41 Sangsom 2 Kanchanaburi Food and beverage

Support program Pisit

42 Nateechai Surat Thani Food and beverage

Support program Krisanapong

43 Korn Thai Ratchaburi Food and beverage

Support program Paisarn

44 Bangkok Lab & Cosmetic Ratchaburi Chemical Support program Pisit

45 Lactasoy Prachin Buri Food and beverage

Support program Woraphot

46 Charoen Pokphand Produce Lop Buri Food and beverage

Support program Dr.Pisit

76



National Expert

47 The Pet Pathum Thani Rubber and plastic

Support program Paitoon

48 Rianthai Interplas, Bangphli Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic


49 Rianthai Interplas, Wellgrow Chachoengsao Rubber and plastic


50 Sahathai Printing and Packaging Pathum Thani Pulp and paper Support program Dr.Somchai

Table f.2 Energy savings from the factories implementing EnMS under the project’s support (direct savings)

Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction

MWh GJ

Aeroflex 1 Survey energy saving 428 2172 Optimize Set Point Glycol system B

for fermentation process20 10

Beer thip brewery (1991)

3 Improve Efficiency Biogas Process 30 154 Increasing % Condensate Return 980 935 Replace lights in warehouse 3 2

Charoen Pokphand Foods

6 Fit VSD to boiler fan 14 7.087 Reduce chiller condensing pressure 18 9.088 Reduce unload time of Polisher 662 3359 Reduce leakage in Air compression

system390 198

C.P. Rice10 Energy efficient Air condition

replacement16 8

11 Replace Fluorescent with LED lighting 19 1012 Install VSD in blower system 680 34413 Reduce air compressor pressure

from 8 to 5 bar422 214

14 Improve condensing unit of chillers 348 17615 Improve condensing unit of chilled

and freeze process66 34

Cerebos (Laem Chabang)

16 Reduce load stored in freezer 13 717 Reduce leak from compressed air 72 3718 Better control for CT-600 426 21619 Heat recovery from Condensate 3,160 19320 CIP improvement 12,640 774

Cerebos (Pinthong)

21 Stop using Diaphragm pump 296 15022 Using heat pump to reduce steam

demand from boiler 14,806 906

23 Reduce hot water consumption in CIP Process

13,258 811

Eastern Polypack24 Compressed air leaked improvement 1,760 88925 Chiller improvement 1,030 520

77



MWh GJ

Fuengfuanant26 Survey energy saving (Elec) 574 29027 Survey energy saving (Thermal) Biogas 23,908

Government Pharmaceutical Organization

28 Increase %RH in production area 390 19829 Change switching period of boiler 384

Innolatex

30 reduce lighting at the walk way 11 631 remodel Gas station n/a n/a32 Install vaporizer 708 4333 Replace fluorescent lamp with LED 3 234 Increase Temp from 24C to 26C

in ET area17 9

Kulwong

35 Replace lights from T8 to LED 34 1836 Reduce operating time of the air

conditioners148 75

37 Reduce pressure of compressed air system

4 2

38 Rotate the heat sink of compressed air system

3 2

PTT Global Chemical (Plant 5)

39 Total Energy Saving in 2014Y 126,000 10,37540 Total Energy Saving in 2015Y 534,000 31,07541 Total Energy Saving in 2016Y 313,000 18,173

Sahaviriya Plate Mill

42 Control operation main motor at leveler 2,416 1,22243 Control time for Turn on/off of motor

hydraulic pump at cooling bed352 0.64

44 Control motor of cooling tower by VSD 172 4945 Install VSD motor for Hot water pump 171 8746 Install High efficiency Air-conditioning 63 3347 Better control for ball rolling process 12,880 6,50648 reduce motor's RPM 204 104

Sahaviriya Steel Industries

49 Reduce discharging temperature of slab to 1240 C (Change operation practice)

160,772 12,404

50 Install high efficiency recuperator at furnace no. 2

339,128 26,249

Surabangyikan

51 Reduce steam in bottle washing process 23,152 1,79252 Install VSD (Variable Speed Drive) 200 kW

for Stack & Bag Filter no.1 Blower 2,444 1,236

53 Changing lighting to LED (150 W to LED 50 W)

236 120

54 Changing transparent roof for bottle plant (reducing using lighting energy)

364 184

55 Improve Incinerator no.1 62,428 4,832

Tep Kinsho Foods56 Reduce Electricity in FREEZER Room 606 30657 Maintenance Split type Air Condition 888 449

Thai MMA58 Install APC system for MMA#2 plant59 Change LED Project 352 17860 Change cooling fan blade 98 50

78



MWh GJ

Thai Nippon Rubber

61 Install timer for air-conditioned 14 762 Install Cooling Tower Gel Machine 20 1163 Install VSD at Dipping supply pump 42 2264 Preheat Wash water by Condensate water 1,412 713

Thai Ruam Jai Korat

65 Reduce idle of Air Compressor 1 828 41966 Reduce energy intake blower 7251 36 1867 Close reduce fan Cooling 1 cell 68 3568 Reduce the amount of excess air 1,876 7369 Blow-down control 1,986 7770 Preheat air inlet 3,526 136

Tong Siang 71 Survey energy saving (Elec) 454 230

TPI Polene

72 Reduce demand of Compressed air 258 13173 Remove Curve Belt 6.10.02 9 574 Remove Curve Belt 6.10.03 9 575 Remove Curve Belt 7.37 9 5

Total 32,304 1,635,712 124,127

Remark:1. The direct support from the project consisted of the expert training for host facility and candidate plant, the EnMS implementation.2. n/a = not available, the company described what they have done to improve energy efficiency, but they did not provide the quantitative data for calculation. 3. The calculation of the reduction of GHG emission use the following co-efficient. – Emissions Factor for grid electricity : 0.5051 tCO2 /MWh – Emissions Factor for fuel oil : 77.4 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for coal : 94.6 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for natural gas : 56.1 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for LPG : 61.2 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for Biomass : 0.693 tCO2 /ton4. The duration for GHG reduction calculation is from the implementing year to the end of project (2017). For example, a measure implemented in 2015 would be considered for 2 years of direct impact during the IEE project implementation. It has been assumed that the saving would be conservatively counted for 2016 and 2017.

79


F.2 Factories with EnMP Implemented

Table f.3 List of factories with EnMP implemented (from survey)

No. Factory Sector

1 A.F.E. Co.,Ltd. Food

2 Actu-Lum Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

3 Aditya Birla Chemicals (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Chemical

4 AeroFlex Co., Ltd. Rubber and plastic

5 Ajinomoto (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food

6 Alphatex Industries Co.,Ltd. Textiles

7 Apex Plastech Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

8 Asia Fiber Public Company Limited Chemical

9 Asian Seafoods Coldstorage Co.,Ltd. (Suratthani Branch) Food

10 Bangkok Iron and Steel Works Co.,Ltd. Basic metals

11 Bangkok Lab & Cosmetic Co.,Ltd Chemical

12 Beer Thip Brewery (1991) Co., Ltd Beverage

13 Bergsoe Metals Co., Ltd Basic metals

14 Betagro Holding Co.,Ltd. Food

15 Betagro Public Co.,Ltd. Food

16 British Dispensary (L.P.) Chemical

17 C.P. Meiji Food

18 C.P. Rice Co., Ltd. Food

19 Cardinal Health 222 (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

20 Cargill Meats Thailand Limited Food

21 Cerebos (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Leamchabang Food

22 Cerebos (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Pintong Food

23 Chang Awards (1959) Co.,Ltd. Food

24 Chaodee Modified Starch Co.,Ltd. Food

25 Charoen Pokphand Foods Food

26 Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited ( Cheese Plant) Food

27 Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited ( Saraburi Plant) Food

28 Charoen Pokphand Northeastern Public Co.,Ltd. Food

29 Chef's Choice Foods Manufacturer Co.,Ltd. Food

30 Chiang Mai Beverage Co.,Ltd. Food

31 Chiangmai Frozen Foods Public Co.,Ltd. Food

32 Chusinconcrete Co.,Ltd Non-metallic

33 Comform Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper

34 Cosmos Brewery (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Beverage

35 DIC Graphics (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Chemical

36 DZ Card (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

37 Eastern Polypack Co., Ltd. Certified Rubber and plastic

38 Eiamheng Tapioca Industry Co.,Ltd. Food

80


No. Factory Sector

39 Eiamrungruang Industry Co.,Ltd. Food

40 F&N Dairies (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food

41 Ferro (Thailand) Chemical

42 Forward Freeland Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

43 Fuengfuanant Co.,Ltd. Beverage

44 G J Steel Public Company Limited Basic metals

45 Giffarine Skyline Laboratory & Health Care Co.,Ltd. Chemical

46 Guangken rubber (Thai southern) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

47 Haad Thip (Suratthani) Public Company Limited Beverage

48 Healthy Bee Co.,Ltd. Food

49 Imco Pack Corporation Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

50 Innolatex (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

51 IPD Packaging Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

52 IRPC Public Company Limited Chemical

53 IRPC Public Company Limited (BTX Plant) Chemical

54 IRPC Public Company Limited (PS Plant) Chemical

55 J-Gourmet Co.,Ltd. Food

56 Jong Stit Co.,Ltd. Textiles

57 Kanchanasingkorn Co.,Ltd. Beverage

58 Kasisuri Co.,LTD Food

59 Khonburi Sugar Public Company Limited Food

60 King Milling (Suratthani) Co.,Ltd. Food

61 Kohler (Thailand) Public Company Limited Non-metallic

62 Korn Thai Co., Ltd. Food

63 Kulthorn Kirby Foundry CO.,LTD Basic metals

64 Kulwong Co., Ltd. Chemical

65 Kurashiki Siam Rubber Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

66 LACTASOY CO.,LTD. Beverage

67 Laiyamas Co.,Ltd. Food

68 Lee Feed Mill (Saraburi) Food

69 Lee Feed Mill Public Co.,Ltd., Food

70 LPN Plate Mill Public Co.,Ltd. Basic metals

71 Lucky Star Weaving Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

72 Magnequench (Korat) Co.,Ltd Basic metals

73 Mahaphant Fiber Cement Non-metallic

74 Maneemongkol Import-Export Co.,Ltd., Rubber and plastic

75 Mead Johnson Nutrition (Thailand) Ltd. Food

76 Modern Dyestuffs & Pigments Co.,Ltd. Chemical

77 MSC PR Two Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

78 Nateechai Co.,Ltd. Beverage

79 Nawarat Patanakarn Public Company Limited Non-metallic

81


No. Factory Sector

80 NEP Realty And Industry Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic

81 Nestle (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food

82 NEW BIODIESEL CO.,LTD Chemical

83 Nishikawa Tachaplalert Cooper Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

84 Nissen Chemitec (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

85 Nisshin-STC Flour Milling Company Limited Food

86 North East Tapioca Flour Co.,Ltd. Food

87 Nova Steel Co.,Ltd. Basic metals

88 NYC Industry Co.,Ltd Rubber and plastic

89 Oji Label (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic

90 Oji Paper (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper

91 Okamoto Textile (THAILAND) Co.,Ltd. Textiles

92 Osotspa Co.,Ltd. Chemical

93 P.P. TEXTILE PRINTING & DYEING Co.,Ltd. Textiles

94 P.S. Wongcharoen Co.,Ltd. Food

95 PANDS Nakornluang Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic

96 Park Chong Jute Mill Co.,Ltd. Textiles

97 PB Pipe (THAILAND) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

98 Pepsi-Cola (Thai) Trading Co.,Ltd. Food

99 PET Pak CO.,LTD Rubber and plastic

100 Phiphatanakit Textile Co.,Ltd. Textiles

101 Premium Foods Co.,Ltd. Food

102 Primaham (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food

103 Prime Product Industry Co.,Ltd. Food

104 PTT Global Chemical Chemical

105 PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (Branch 2) Chemical

106 PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (Plant 4) Chemical

107 PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited (Plant12) Chemical

108 PTT Phenol Co.Ltd. Chemical

109 PTT Tank Terminal Co.,Ltd. Chemical

110 Red Bull Distillery (1988) Co., Ltd. Beverage

111 Rianthai Interplas Co.,Ltd bangplee Rubber and plastic

112 Rianthai Interplas Co.,Ltd wellgrow Rubber and plastic

113 Royal Can Industries Rubber and plastic

114 Ruampornmitr Pokphand Co.,Ltd. Food

115 Ruey Tay Fibre Industry Co.,Ltd. Textiles

116 Rung Silp Printing Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper

117 Saha Thai Printing & Packaging Pulp and paper

118 Sahaviriya Plate Mill Basic metals

119 Sahaviriya Steel Industries Basic metals

120 Sampran Weaving Co.,Ltd. Textiles

82


No. Factory Sector

121 SangSom Co., Ltd.(SangSom 2) Beverage

122 Sanguan Wongse Industries Co.,Ltd. Food

123 Santiphab Trading Co.,Ltd Food

124 Sermsuk Public Company Limited Beverage

125 Siam Brothers Corp., Ltd Textiles

126 Siam Chemical Industry Co.,Ltd. Chemical

127 Siam Fukoku (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

128 Siam Keeper Manufacturing Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

129 Siam Mitsui PTA Chemical

130 Siam Nawaloha Foundry Co.,Ltd. Basic metals

131 Siam Steel International Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic

132 Siam United Steel Basic metals

133 Siam Yachiyo Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

134 Sriprasit Pharma Co.,Ltd. Chemical

135 Srithai Superware Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic

136 SSDC (Tigertex) Co.,Ltd. Textiles

137 Starcore Co.,Ltd. Basic metals

138 Sumitomo Rubber Thailand Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

139 Surabangyikan Beverage

140 Surapon Nichirei Food Co.,Ltd Food

141 Surat Thani Beverage Company Limited Beverage

142 Suretex Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

143 Tanyarungroengchai Rice Mill (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food

144 Tawanna Packaging Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper

145 TCRSS Basic metals

146 Teck Bee Hang (Yang Thai Paktai) Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

147 Tep Kinsho Foods Co., Ltd. Food

148 Thai Central Chemical Public Company Limited Chemical

149 Thai Daizo Aerosol Co.,Ltd. Chemical

150 Thai Identity Sugar Factory Co.,Ltd. Food

151 Thai Industries Development Co.,Ltd., Textiles

152 Thai MFC Chemical

153 Thai Mitsuwa Public Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

154 Thai MMA Co., Ltd. CCS Plant Chemical

155 Thai MMA Co., Ltd. MMA Plant Chemical

156 Thai Nam Tapioca Co., Ltd Food

157 Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. Rubber and plastic

158 Thai PET Resin Chemical

159 Thai Pigeon Rubber and plastic

160 Thai Polyethylene Co.,Ltd. Plant 1 Chemical


83


No. Factory Sector


163 Thai Ruam Jai Korat Co., Ltd. Food

164 Thai Silicate Chemical Chemical

165 Thai Stanley Electric Public Company Limited Rubber and plastic

166 Thai Takeda Lace Co., Ltd (Plant1) Textiles

167 Thai Takeda Lace Co., Ltd (Plant2) Textiles

168 Thai Toray Synthetics Company Limited Chemical

169 Thai Union Frozen Products Public Company Limited Food

170 Thai Wah Starch Public Company Limited Food

171 Thaifoods Group Public Company Limited Food

172 Thainamthip Manufacturing Co.,Ltd Food

173 Thainitrate Chemical

174 Thaitallow And Oil Co.,Ltd. Food

175 Thanapakdi Co.,Ltd. Beverage

176 The CPAC roof tile Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic

177 The Government Pharmaceutical Organization Chemical

178 THE PET CO.,LTD. Rubber and plastic

179 The Siam White cement Co.,Ltd. Non-metallic

180 Theppadungporn Coconut Food

181 Tia Ngee Hiang (Chao Sua) Co.,Ltd. Food

182 Tipco Asphalt Public Company Limited Non-metallic

183 Tokai Eastern Rubber (Thailand), Ltd. Rubber and plastic

184 Tong-Siang Co.,Ltd. Textiles

185 TPI Polene Public Company Limited Non-metallic

186 TPN FlexPak Co.,Ltd. Pulp and paper

187 Trio Plastic Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

188 U.R. Chemical Co,.ltd. Chemical

189 Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry, Ltd. Chemical

190 Unichamp Co.,Ltd. Food

191 United Farmer & Industry Co.,Ltd. Food

192 United Paper Public Company Limited Pulp and paper

193 Vara Food & Drink Co.,Ltd. Food

194 Vinythai Public Company Limited Chemical

195 Von Bundit CO., LTD Rubber and plastic

196 Wiik and Hoeglund Rubber and plastic

197 Y.T.Rubber Co.,Ltd. Rubber and plastic

198 Yakult (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Food

199 Yan Wal Yun Corporation Group Co.,Ltd. Food

200 Yearrakarn Co.,Ltd. Food

84


Table f.4 Energy savings measures implemented according to EnMP in placed (indirect savings)

Factory No. Implemented measures Total Energy savings Total GHG Reduction (ton CO2)MWh GJ

Alphatex Industries1 Install reflection panel at lighting 74 37

2 Reschedule Supply-Return operation 438 222

3 insulation improvement 612 33

4 Change old injection no. 7 to All Electric Injection Machine

386 195

Apex Plastech


324 164


324 164

7 Change Fluorescent T8 to LED 150 76

8 Clean 2 condensing unit 600 303

Asia Fiber 9 Insulation improvement 844 47

10 Fix steam trap leaks 212 12

11 Install VSD of Fan of motor No.1 278 141

12 Install VSD of Fan of motor No.2 278 141

Bergsoe Metals 13 Change new burner at Furnace 1 2,886 223

14 Change new burner at Furnace 2 2,886 223

Betagro

15 Compressed air system efficiency improvement

48 24

16 Change new roof sheet Which the sunlight can pass through

60 30

Betagro Holding17 Install VSD controller to air compressor 116 58

18 Install Economizer 5,424 342

Charoen Pokphand Foods (Saraburi Plant)

19 Install high efficiency motor (315 kW) n/c n/c

20 Install high efficiency motor (250 kW) n/c n/c

21 Mini Pellet Mill n/c n/c

22 Improve combustion chamber at boiler 1 n/c n/c

23 Fix the combustion chamber n/c n/c

24 Air-compressor system 3 1

25 reduce set point of air compressor 7 3

Chusinconcrete26 Improve Power factor value by install

Capacitor22 11

27 Improve power factor of transformer 33 17

28 Improve power factor of EVG motor 94 48

29 Improve power factor of concrete cutter motor

42 21

85



Forward Freeland 30 install VSD controller to air compressor (100 hp)

220 111

31 Change Fluorescent to LED 20 10

32 Change lighting system from 400 W to LED 18 W

48 25

33 Install new air conditioner 12,000 Btu 4 2

34 Reduce leakage 24 12

G J Steel 35 Reduce compressed air set point 656 331

Giffarine Skyline Laboratory & Health Care

36 Adjust cooling water flow rate 123 62

37 Adjust chiller schedule 65 33

38 Reduce steam working pressure (Boiler) 206 15

Haad Thip (Suratthani)

39 Change Hibay to LED 61 31

40 Condensate recovery 303 19

Imco Pack Corporation

41 Change Ventilation fan to Evaporative Cooling System

1,340 677

42 Change Water Cool Chiller to Air Cool Chiller

1,633 825

43 VSD Control for Cooling Pump 618 312

IPD Packaging 44 Change Fluorescent to LED 16 W @4,350 unit

229 116

IRPC (BTX Plant) 45 Heat integration of Unit100 & 400 at BTX Plant

186,537 10,464

46 Cooling tower improvement 331 167

Kanchanasingkorn


48 Change Distillery system from direct to indirect

1,314 102

49 Install 2nd plate heat exchanger 1,001 77

King Milling (Suratthani)

50 Productivity improvement : reduce energy usage

416 23

51 Maintenance air-compressor 202 102

52 Switch off light during lunch break 492 249

Kohler (Thailand) 53 Measure combustion efficiency at AHU Plant no. 1-7

5,064 284

54 Pre-heat the air at Plant 5 3,798 213

55 Reduce running hours from 13 hours to 11 hours

1,688 95

86



LPN Plate Mill Public

56 Reduce pressure set point on shut down period

66 33

57 Reduce electrical consumption of lighting system

2 1

58 Reduce air-conditioner consumption in canteen

14 7

59 Reduce Motor Exhaust Blower usage 132 67

60 Reduce energy consumption at start-up reheat furnace

5,012 388

61 Change new method to control temperature at oven

83,518 6,464

Lucky Star Weaving

62 change bulb 250W to LED Low Bay 150W

126 63

63 Reduce operation time of Conversion Machine

306 155

64 Reduce compressed air leakage 270 137

MSC PR Two65 Use 7.5 kW air compressor for 37 kw

in night time112 56


Nawarat Patanakarn 67 Reduce office electrical consumption 86 43

New Biodiesel 68 Insulation improvement 4,438 243

Nissen Chemitec 69 install new LED 428 216

70 Change to new LED 126 63

71 Change Hibay to LED Hibay 200W 136 69

NYC Indusrtry72 Change T8 46W to Induction Lamp 120W 4 2

73 Change Flood Light 400W to 200W 12 6

74 Change 200W to 120W bulb 10 5

Okamoto Textile75 Change Fluorescent to LED 18 Watt 1,238 625

76 Insulation improvement at plant 4 376 29


Premium Foods78 Energy reduction activity at lunch break 268 135

79 Energy reduction in compressed air system

172 87

80 Change fuel from LPG to Biomass 5,654 357

Prime Product Industry

81 Reduce energy consumption of Highbay lighting

31 15


82 Repair Instrument air leakage 525 265

83 A-110A/B operating time optimization 357 180

84 P-205 Impeller coating 51 25

87




85 change new type of air compressor 552 279

86 stop A-0301 142 72

87 adjust load C-0302,C-0881 during TRSD 1 0.38

88 Add BRS Supply -8 to -7 80 40

89 stop A-0201 and A-0221 in TRS period 1 0.38

90 EPP-steam-1: Bring crude HX to purify at T-1704 by pass through T-1703

266 15


91 ERP-Elec-1:Change new type of Air Compressor

522 264

PTT Phenol 92 Reduce power consumption at refrigeration unit

263 133

93 Reduce NG consumption at flare 3,329 187

94 Reduce Steam consumption at Dipp column

6,068 340

Ruey Tay Fibre Industry

95 Change 36W fluorescent @100 unit 32 16

Siam Chemical Industry

96 Reduce compressed-air leakage 48 24

97 Improve air-conditioner ventilation 50 25

98 install automatic valve 240 121

99 Reduce chiller cooling water flow 46 24

100 Control cooling water flow for production 574 290

101 insulation improvement at hot oil and Steam pipe

290 16

102 Change new Burner of hot oil heater 1,544 87

Siam Nawaloha Foundry

103 improve air-compressor system 40 20

104 Set running order of air compressor to match with production demand

466 236

Siam Steel International

105 Change mercury lighting to Fluorescent lighting

102 51


107 Turn off air conditioner at lunch break 16 8

Siam Yachiyo

108 change to LED 20 10

109 Install Air Knife + Blower 176 89

110 Insulate Barel injection machine 220 ton, 180 ton

6 3

111 Improve Air supply system for Production1

152 76

Surapon Nichirei Food

112 Reschedule Air Housing Unit on-off time 74 38

113 Adjust compressor of chiller 36 18

114 Improve cooling tower/Condenser system 144 73

115 reduce steam leakage 0 3,944 249

116 Change the lighting system to LED 342 173

88



Surat Thani Beverage

117 Insulation improvement at boiler 14 1

118 Heat pump 1,040 81

119 Heat recovery from hot water 106 54

Suretex 120 centralize all the chillers to make a common chiller water system

5,502 2,779

121 Improvement oven insulation 48 25

Thai Daizo Aerosol 122 Reduce electrical consumption 302 153

123 Replace new cooling fan (W-7951A,B) 880 444

Thai PolyethylenePlant 1

124 Combine HDPE#4/PP#3 air compressor system

2,796 1,412

125 Modified line CW at SL cooler to reduce CW usage

212 107

126 Optimize C-3301 Load 2,484 1,255

Thai Polyethylene Plant 3

127 Single slurry cooler of both reactors H1000P grade

132 66

128 Reduce temperature at ethylene preheater (30 to 23 C)

2,008 113

129 Reduce reflux ratio of distillation columnT-5703 (25 to 20%)

15,660 879

130 Reduce temp ethylene preheater (from 30 to 23C)

4 0.18

131 Mass Color 5,814 2,936

132 C-502, C-503A/B Install pressure transmitter (Suction Filter)

260 131

133 VVVF to optimize electrical consumption for C901

146 74

134 Reduce power consumption by pump coating (P1300A/B/C)

190 96

Thai Polyethylene Plant 7

135 C-2502, C-2503A/B Install pressure transmitter (Suction Filter)

284 143

136 VVVF to optimize electrical consumption for C2901

190 96

137 Increase LS flash steam from D851 from modification

4,422 248

138 Reduce Steam consumption of degassing purge air heater by using ambient temperature purge air part reduce time hot purge

626 35

Thai Takeda Lace (13131)

139 Change to LED 18 watt @1,100 unit 148 75

Thai Takeda Lace (13999)


89



Thai Toray Synthetics

141 Improve compressor and cooling tower of chiller

700 354

142 Install Solar cell 10 kwp + Change to LED 18 watt bulb

18 9


144 Reduce suction pressure to Compressor 524 265

145 Install Chiller automatic control 3,950 1,996

Thai Union Frozen Products

146 Ball cleaning 94 48

147 Change to LED 20W Plant Fish 2 524 265

148 Install Hibay LED 150W 36 18

149 Booster pump SCM 1,782 900

150 Install Economizer C3 4,154 393

Thaifoods Group

151 Change T8 to LED 14 W 318 161

152 Washing machine change energy source from electricity to steam and Clothes dryers from Gas to Steam

116 6

Thanapakdi

153 Install new high efficiency Heat Exchanger

2,494 193

154 Fix Steam Tap and change new By Pass valve

170 13


156 Reduce working hours of Milling machine 384 194

157 Install timer to turn-on and turn-off electrical Heater clamp

52 27

Tipco Asphalt158 Cancel a transformer 500 KVA 22 11

159 Change lighting system from 3 Units to 2 Units (36W each)

8 4

160 Install new air conditioner total 16 units 80 41

161 Reduce running hours of milling machine 798 62

Tokai Eastern Rubber (Thailand)

162 Chang street light to LED 36 18

163 Chang to LED bulb 424 215

U.R. Chemical164 Reduce leakage 20 10

165 Control blowdown rate of air dryer 0.44 0.22

Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry

166 Change to high efficiency motors 72 36


United Farmer & Industry

168 Control production process 23 kWh/Tc 2,450 1,238

90



Y.T.Rubber

169 Improve Waste Water Treatment Plant Electrical Consumption

80 41

170 Reduce free-run of machine 202 102

171 Improve lighting control 22 11

172 Adjust control valve at Burner of Dryer 3,326 210

Total 50,427 363,262 48,315

Remark:1. The factory personnel attended the 2-day user trainings and applied the knowledge to improve their energy usage.2. n/a = not available. The company described what they have done to improve energy efficiency, but they did not provide the quantitative data for calculation. n/c = not count. The company implemented energy efficiency measures in 2017. Therefore, the savings per year are shown, but the total savings are not counted.3. The calculation of the reduction of GHG emission use the following co-efficient. – Emissions Factor for grid electricity : 0.5051 tCO2 /MWh – Emissions Factor for fuel oil : 77.4 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for coal : 94.6 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for natural gas : 56.1 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for LPG : 61.2 tCO2 /TJ – Emissions Factor for Biomass : 0.693 tCO2 /ton4. The duration for GHG reduction calculation is from the implementing year to the end of project (2017). For example, a measure implemented in 2015 would be considered for 2 years of direct impact during the IEE project implementation. It has been assumed that the saving would be conservatively counted for 2016 and 2017.

91


F.3 Factories Implementing SO with DIP’s and IEE Project’s Support

Table f.5 List of system optimization assessment


National Expert

Steam System

1 Ampol Food Processing Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage

Expert training Preecha



Expert training Manit

3 Krungthai Feedmill, Prapadang

Samut Prakan Food and beverage

Expert training Dr.Atikorn

4 Thai Union Frozen Products Samut Sakhon Food and beverage

Expert training Rawit

5 Surabangyikan Pathum Thani Food and beverage

Expert training Dr.Paitoon


Expert training Dr.Wasan

7 Tong Siang (Palm Shell) Samut Sakhon Textiles Expert training Dr.Surachai

8 Thai Containers Group Chon Buri Pulp and paper

Expert training Khongsit

9 IRPC Rayong Chemical Expert training Dr.Somchai

10 Thai Toray Synthetics Bangkok Chemical Expert training Manchima

11 Hwafong Rubber Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic

Expert training Nueng

12 CPRAM Pathum Thani Food and beverage

Expert training Phongjaroon

13 Suksomboon Palm Oil Chon Buri Food and beverage

Expert training Sayan

14 Kanayama Kasei Chon Buri Rubber and plastic

Expert training Wipawan

15 Thai Asia Rice Product Prae Food and beverage

Expert training Yongyuth*

16 MMP International Samut Sakhon Food and beverage

Expert training Woraphot

17 F&N Dairies Ayutthaya Food and beverage

Expert training Chirasak

18 Chan Cha Rern Foam Ayutthaya Rubber and plastic

Expert training Ampol

19 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Ratchaburi

Ratchaburi Food and beverage

TEM Nueng

20 Thai Tallow and Oil, Saikherng

Surat Thani Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Surachai

21 Thai Tallow and Oil, Bangsawan

Surat Thani Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Atikorn

22 Taksinpalm (2521) Surat Thani Food and beverage

TEM Rawit

23 Palm Tongkum Surat Thani Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Wasan

92



National Expert

24 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Mahachai

Samut Sakhon Food and beverage

TEM Nueng

25 Friendship Corn Starch Samut Prakan Food and beverage

TEM Phongjaroon

26 Thai Nisshin Seifun Samut Prakan Food and beverage

TEM Chirasak

27 Premier Canning Industry Samut Prakan Food and beverage

TEM Chirasak

28 Surapon Foods Samut Prakan Food and beverage

TEM Chirasak

29 Friesland Campina Fresh Bangkok Food and beverage

TEM Phongjaroon

30 Chumpol Food Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage

TEM Phongjaroon

31 Cosmos Brewery Ayutthaya Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Paitoon

32 JBF Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage

TEM Phongjaroon

33 K.R.S. Spicy Food Pathum Thani Food and beverage

TEM Chirasak

34 Asian Superior Foods Ratchaburi Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Paitoon

35 Monkey King Food Pathum Thani Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Paitoon

36 Tong Siang (Wood pallet) Samut Sakhon Textiles Biomass boiler study

Dr.Surachai Dr.Wasan

37 Otaco Trang Food and beverage

Biomass boiler study


38 Chumporn Palm Oil Chumphon Food and beverage



39 Pitak Palm Trang Food and beverage



40 Kean Chareon Kamphaeng Phet Food and beverage



41 Kaset Thai International Nakhon Sawan Food and beverage



42 Rajburi Sugar Ratchaburi Food and beverage



43 Samo Thong Palm 2 Surat Thani Food and beverage



44 Nam Hong Palm Oil Krabi Food and beverage



45 Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry

Samut Prakan Chemical Support program Dr.Atikorn

46 Atimart Buri Ram Food and beverage

Support program Phongjaroon

47 Cerebos Chon Buri Food and beverage


93



National Expert

Compressed Air System

48 Ampol Food Processing Nakhon Pathom Food and beverage

Expert training Dr.Jaytawee Suchai



Expert training Dr .Pa i toon Kran Manchima

50 Apex Plastech Bangkok Rubber and plastic

Expert training Passakorn

51 Hwafong Rubber Samut Prakan Rubber and plastic

Expert training Nueng

52 BS Metal Chachoengsao Basic metal Expert training Dr.Pisit

53 Eastern Polypack (plant no.3)

Rayong Rubber and plastic

Expert training Kritsanapong

54 Eastern Polypack (plant no.2)

Rayong Rubber and plastic

Expert training Viboolpong Nadtaya Tanatid Phai

55 Aeroflex Rayong Rubber and plastic

Expert training PhongjaroonWoraphot

56 F&N Dairies Ayutthaya Food and beverage

Expert training Chirasak Pis-it

57 Red Bull 1988 Samut Sakhon Food and beverage

Expert training Yongyuth

58 PTTGC Rayong Chemical Expert training Dr.Somchai

59 Thai Nippon Rubber Chon Buri Rubber and plastic

TEM Manchima

60 CPRAM, Ladkrabang Bangkok Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Paitoon

61 Thai Glico Ratchaburi Food and beverage

TEM Dr.Paitoon

62 Thai Better Foods Pathum Thani Food and beverage

TEM Chirasak

63 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Ban Bueng

Chon Buri Food and beverage

TEM Suchai

64 Charoen Pokphand Foods, Nong Khae

Saraburi Food and beverage

TEM Suchai

65 Ajinomoto Samut Prakan Food and beverage

TEM Suchai

66 National Starch and Chemical

Rayong Food and beverage

Support program Wanlapa


Support program Pisit

68 Songkla Canning Songkhla Food and beverage


69 Cerebos Chon Buri Food and beverage


94



National Expert

Pumping System

70 Bangkok Iron and Steel Works, Direct cooling line

Samut Prakan Basic metal Expert training Chirasak Suchai

71 Bangkok Iron and Steel Works, Indirect cooling line

Samut Prakan Basic metal Expert training Rawit Dr.Wasan Umpawan

72 PI Industry Rayong Rubber and plastic

TEM Chirasak

73 Creative Polymers Rayong Rubber and plastic

TEM Suchai

Fan System

74 Thai Ruam Jai Vegetable Oil, System no. 1

Ayutthaya Food and beverage

Expert training Phongjaroon

75 Thai Ruam Jai Vegetable Oil, System no. 2

Ayutthaya Food and beverage

Expert training Pisit Suchai Ampol Nuttawut

76 Siam Cement Group, Ta Luang

Saraburi Non-metallic Expert training Rawit

Note: *Mr. Yongyuth did not pass the SSO expert exam, but his report has been supervised and approved by the international experts.

Table f.6 Energy savings from the factories conducting system optimization assessment under the project’s support (direct savings)


MWh GJ

Aeroflex 1 Reduce System Leakage 304 154

Ampol Food Processing

2 Steam leak maintenance program 972 40

3 Reduce leakage (Compressed Air) 750 379

Apex Plastech


5 Air Compressor Sequence Control System 580 293

6 Install high efficiency air compressor 130 66

7 Reduce Air inlet Temperature 736 373

Beer thip brewery (1991)

8 Change boiler's fuel to Bituminous coal n/a n/a

9 Condensate return improvement n/a n/a

10 Reduce leakage in the system 81 41

BS Metal 11 Reduce leakage 52 27

12 Insulation improvement 232 12

Chan Cha Rern Foam 13 Fix Steam trap n/a n/a

14 Clean boiler combustion room n/a n/a

Charoen Pokphand Foods (Mahachai Plant)

15 Increase Condensate Recovery 1.76 0.17

16 Decrease Blow down 0.20 0.02

95



MWh GJ

Charoen Pokphand Foods (Nongjok Plant)

17 Reduce leakage 1,130 571

18 Link all compressor houses by new piping and install new VSD Air Compressor.

374 190

19 Reduce temperature at compressor house 36 19

Charoen Pokphand Foods (Saraburi Plant)

20 Leak reduction 260 131

Cosmos 21 change boiler blow down rate 1,250 97

CP Ram 22 Feedwater Economizer 3,568 276

CP Ram (Ladkrabang plant)

23 Leak reduction 20 10

Eastern Polypack (Plant No.2)

24 Reduce Compressor Inlet Temperature (From 36.7 C to 35.5 C )

46 24

25 Reduce Generation Pressure from 8.2 Bars to 7.90 Bars

112 57

Eastern Polypack (Plant No.3)

26 Change Compressor Running Order 584 255

27 Reduce System Leakage 2,542 1,285

F&N Dairies

28 Reduce excess air n/a n/a

29 Reduce blowdown rate n/a n/a

30 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a

31 Condensate recovery n/a n/a

32 Reduce steam leak n/a n/a

33 Steam trap fix n/a n/a

34 Reduce pressure (2015) 80 41

Friendship Corn StarchFriesland Campina

35 Reduce System Leakage (2015) 72 37

36 Leak reduction (2016) 67 34

37 Decrease Blow down 0.25 0.02

38 Decrease Blow down rate 195 15

39 Improve feed water quality (RO system) n/a n/a

Hwafong Rubber (Thailand)

40 Reduce leakage on 6 bars line 156 79



43 Change to high efficient air compressor 2,620 1,324

IRPC 44 Develop prosteam for real time monitoring their system

n/a n/a

JBF 45 Decrease Blow down 240 15

Kanayama Kasei 46 Improve Insulation 308 17

Monkey King Food47 improve steam leak 27 2

48 change boiler blow down rate 108 7

National Starch & Chemical

49 Switch off one set of instrument 's air dryer 74 38

50 Reduce System Leakage 240 122

51 Compressor control on trim compressor 186 95

96



MWh GJ

PI Industry 52 Trim pump impeller 246 125

Premier Canning Industry

53 steam leaks maintenance programs 925 88

Red Bull 198854 Reduce System Leakage 204 104

55 Reduce Generation Pressure 16 8

Surabangyikan

56 Excess air reduction. 37,240 2,883

57 blow-down rate reduction 47,588 3,683

58 Steam leak maintenance program 38,526 2,982

Thai Containers Group59 Fine tune %O2 (Yearly Service by Supplier) 4,788 371

60 Install insulation on naked pipe 410 32

Thai Union Frozen Products

61 Clean boiler heat transfer surfaces – boiler B1 and B7

2,204 171

62 Install Economizer on boiler No. C3 6,510 504

63 PRV control : Fluctuating load reduction n/a n/a

64 TDS control : Control blowdown rate n/a n/a

65 Steam trap maintenance program n/a n/a

The Bangkok Iron and Steel Work

66 Turn Off the pump 44 23

Tong Siang

67 Installed VSD controller 532 269

68 Survey energy saving (Thermal) Palm Shell n/a n/a

69 Fine tune %O2 15,180 623

70 Return condensate 33,502 1,374

71 Improve steam trap leaks and machine leakage

8,652 355

UENO Fine Chemical

72 Install New boiler & Economizer 24,318 1,364

73 Reduce blowdown rate 194 11


Total 13,862 226,939 21,897

97


F.4 Factories Implementing SO by sending the personnel to attend SO trainings

Table f.7 Energy savings measures implemented by the factories sending their personnel to attend SO trainings (indirect savings)


Aditya Birla Chemicals1 Installed VSD controller n/a n/a

2 Install high efficiency motor n/a n/a

Air Liquide Thailand 3 Installed VSD controller 296 150

Bangkok Alcohol Industrial

4 Installed VSD controller n/a n/a

5 Reduce leakage n/a n/a

Bangkok Iron and Steel Works

6 Install ring-loop pipe n/a n/a

7 Install sequence controller n/a n/a

8 Use high efficiency air compressor n/a n/a

Cardinal Health 222 9 Use high efficiency motor 584 296


Carpets International Thailand

11 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a


13 Reduce excess air 1,516 96

Cerebos (Pinthong plant)

14 Reduce boiler's working hours 2,721 172

15 Reduce stream pressure 109 7

16 Improve productivity at Retort process 157 10

17 Improve productivity by reduce heating time

601 38

18 Improve Insulation 136 9

Cosmos Brewery 19 Reduce excess air 9,052 856

CP-Meiji20 Improve efficiency : reduce fuel usage 18,526 1,039

21 Install VSD air compressor 459 232

CPRAM 22 Installed VSD controller 130 66

East Water23 Set running sequence by selecting

high efficiency pump firstn/a n/a

24 Installed VSD controller n/a n/a

25 Install high efficiency motor n/a n/a


Fuengfuanant

27 Improve Insulation n/a n/a



30 Fix Steam leaks n/a n/a


98



Interprofile 32 Reduce inlet air temperature n/a n/a

33 Reduce compressed air working pressure 10 5


Kimberly-Clark 35 Change new 2 air compressors 632 320

Kohler (Thailand)

36 Reduce leakage 1,058 535

37 Reduce compressed air working pressure

350 177

38 Use booster device at the high pressure with low demand process

117 59

39 Install sequence controller 899 454


Krabi vegetable oil 41 Blowdown rate reduction n/a n/a

Kurashiki Siam Rubber


43 Reduce inlet air temperature 97 49

44 Reduce compressed air working pressure

82 42

Map Ta Phut Olefins 45 Reduce excess air n/a n/a

MC Towa International Sweeteners


National Starch & Chemical

47 Fix the impeller pump (Wearing condition)

62 31

Polyfoam Kabinburi




51 Fix Steam traps n/a n/a

Pramuanphol 52 Install VSD air compressor 15 8


53 Blowdown rate reduction 4 0.22





PTT Phenol 57 Flash steam recovery n/a n/a


PTT Rayong Gas Separation Plant

59 Reduce flowrate by trim impeller 1,860 939

60 Optimize pumping system 2,580 1,303

61 Non-Metallic Wear ring 14 8

Sahathai Printing and Packaging

62 Fix Steam leaks 28 2

63 Change fuel from Fuel Oil to LPG n/a n/a

99



Sahaviriya Steel Industries




Siam Coated Abrasive 67 Condensate recovery 250 14

Siam Mitsui PTA 68 Turn-off one pump (Over demand) 282 142

Thai MMA 69 Reduce inlet air temperature 8 4

Thai Styrenics 70 Use high efficiency air compressor 0.50 0.26

Thai Nippon Rubber Industry

71 Reduce excess air 8 0.54


Thai Polyethylene 73 Combine HDPE#4/PP#3 air compressor system

1,398 706




Thai Ruam Jai Korat77 Condensate recovery n/a n/a

78 Pre-heat air before supply to combustion chamber

n/a n/a

79 Reduce stream pressure n/a n/a

80 Fine tune %O2 n/a n/a

Thai Silicate Chemical81 Reduce Natural gas at Furnace E and F 3 0.3

82 Reduce Natural gas at Drying Process 684 38

Thai United Awa Paper



85 Reduce inlet air temperature n/a n/a

86 Reduce compressed air working pressure n/a n/a

87 Use high efficiency air compressor n/a n/a

88 Install VSD air compressor n/a n/a

Thai-German Ceramic Industry


The Siam Construction Steel

90 Reduce water consumption 2,000 1,010


92 Reduce inlet air temperature 46 24

TPI Polene

93 Fix Expansion Joint and cracked tube at Tertiary air duct 1

141,481 13,384


153,034 14,477


161,326 15,262

100



United Winery and Distillery



USAM Inter group 98 Use booster device at the high pressure with low demand process

12 6

99 Install ring-loop pipe 80 41



Utopian102 Improve Insulation n/a n/a



105 Fix Steam traps n/a n/a

Total 14,714 491,242 53,102

101

Annex GCase Study

Annex G

Case Study

102

Annex GCase Study

G.1 Case Study

Table g.1 List of case study

No. Factory Sector Topic

1 Charoen Pokphand Foods Food EnMS

2 Sahaviriya Plate Mill Basic metal EnMS

3 C.P. Rice Food EnMS

4 Aeroflex Rubber EnMS

5 Eastern Polypack Plastic EnMS

6 Cerebos Food EnMS

7 Tong Siang Textiles EnMS

8 Thai MMA Chemical EnMS

9 Kulwong Chemical EnMS

10 Innolatex Rubber EnMS

11 FuengFuAnant Beverage EnMS

12 Beer Thip Beverage EnMS

13 Charoen Pokphand Foods Food CASO

14 Aeroflex Rubber EnMS

15 Eastern Polypack Plastic CASO

16 Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry Food SSO

17 F&N Dairies Food SSO

18 Tong Siang Textiles SSO

19 Bangkok Lab & Cosmetic Chemical EnMS

20 Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Rubber EnMS

21 FuengFuAnant Beverage SSO

22 Lee Feed Mill Food SSO

23 Thai Union Frozen Products Food SSO

24 Chan Charoen Plastic SSO

25 Apex Plastech Plastic CaSO

103

Annex GCase Study

(add case studies 25 cases) 1

104

Annex GCase Study

105

Annex GCase Study

3

106

Annex GCase Study

107

Annex GCase Study

5

108

Annex GCase Study

109

Annex GCase Study

7

110

Annex GCase Study

111

Annex GCase Study

9

112

Annex GCase Study

113

Annex GCase Study

11

114

Annex GCase Study

115

Annex GCase Study

13

116

Annex GCase Study

117

Annex GCase Study

15

118

Annex GCase Study

119

Annex GCase Study

17

120

Annex GCase Study

121

Annex GCase Study

19

122

Annex GCase Study

123

Annex GCase Study

21

124

Annex GCase Study

125

Annex GCase Study

23

126

Annex GCase Study

127

Annex GCase Study

25

128

Annex GCase Study

G.2 Fact Sheet

Table g.2 List of fact sheet

No. Factsheet Topic

1 Why would you implement an EnMS? EnMS

2 Guidelines for biomass boiler’s efficiency improvement measures EnMS

129

Annex HSelf-learning Courses

Annex H

Self-learning Courses

130


H.1 Energy Management System Self-Learning Course

To develop the course materials, the project followed the process shown in Figure 4.4, which includes focus group meeting, review of existing materials, questionnaire survey, preparation of draft materials, review by lecturers, and preparation of final materials.

(2-3 pages)

131


132


133


H.2 Financial Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Project Self-Learning Course

Financial Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Project Self-Learning Course for Industrial Sector

There are six chapters in the training course for the industrial sector. The details of each chapter are shown below.

- Chapter 1 - Energy situation in Thailand: Thailand energy situation and the relevant policies have been described in this chapter.

- Chapter 2 - Energy conservation measures by industrial sector: The overview and characteristics of energy use in the industry are explained. Then, the energy saving potential and its examples are illustrated. Several case studies on the consideration of energy efficiency projects are also included to provide the guidance and consideration factors when evaluating a project. The last section of the chapter describes the life cycle cost concept together with an example of how to calculate life cycle cost.

- Chapter 3 - Financial sources of energy conservation projects: The chapter starts by describing the different types of energy savings project in the industry and highlighting the difference between energy efficiency projects and renewable energy projects. In the next section, the various financial sources are described such as funding schemes provided by agencies under the Ministry of Energy, and the energy-related financial products offered by the major banks in Thailand.

- Chapter 4 - Loan system of commercial banks in Thailand: In addition to their own financial resources, the factories, especially SMEs, may take up loans from commercial banks in Thailand to implement their energy efficiency project. The chapter provides an overview of the credit approval and underwriting process. The general credit underwriting tools including the 5C’s of credit and criteria are explained to increase the factory personnel’s understanding of the requirements for successful loan approval.

- Chapter 5 - Business information required for credit underwriting of banks: The key information required for preparing a classic business plan is explained in detail. This type of business plan is typically required by the bank for their consideration and approval of loans.

- Chapter 6 - Financial feasibility study: The chapter walks the audience through the 2 steps of developing a project financial feasibility study. In the first step, the financial projection of the “before implementation” and “when implementing energy efficiency project” is explained. The second step, assessment of financial feasibility, consists of assessment of financial return and assessment of ability to replay loan (solvency) are explained. The description, equation, and examples are provided to show the audience how to calculate the key parameters themselves.

134


Financial Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Project Self-Learning Course for Financial Institutions

There are five chapters in the training course and the details of each chapter are shown below.

- Chapter 1 - Energy situation in Thailand: Thailand energy situation and the relevant policies are described in this chapter.

- Chapter 2 - Financial mechanisms to support energy efficiency projects: The chapter starts by describing the different types of energy savings project in the industry and highlighting the difference between energy efficiency projects and renewable energy projects. The various financial sources are described such as the funding schemes provided by agencies under the Ministry of Energy, and the energy-related financial products offered by the major banks in Thailand. The last section shows oversea examples of financial products to support energy efficiency projects, which consist of LEAP, Siemens energy efficiency financing, green bank, green for growth fund, property assessed clean energy (PACE), clean energy finance corporation (CEFC), loan loss reserve (LLR), loan guarantee, energy efficiency cluster, the utility bill as a loan repayment mechanism, and EBRD regional energy efficiency program (REEP).

- Chapter 3 - Energy conservation measures by industrial sector: The overview and characteristics of energy use in the industry are explained. Then, the energy saving potential and its examples are illustrated. Several case studies on the consideration of energy efficiency projects are also included to provide guidance and consideration factors for the evaluating of projects.

- Chapter 4 - Energy saving measurement and verification (M&V): The chapter is based on the International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol (IPMVP). The objectives, scope and benefits of energy saving M&V are described. The overview of frequently used options for energy saving M&V is also provided. The last section of the chapter describes the life cycle cost concept as well as how to calculate the life cycle cost.

- Chapter 5 - Assessment of EE project financial feasibility: the financial projection of the “before implementation” and “when implementing energy efficiency project” is explained. Apart from the NPV, IRR and payback period commonly used by industry, additional tools, which can be used to evaluate energy-related projects in financial terms, are described. Such tools consist of discount payback period, life cycle cost analysis, levelized cost of energy (LCOE), and saving to investment ratio.

135

Annex ICourse for University

Annex I

Course for University

136


I.1 EnMS Course for University



To learn from other perspectives and discuss the idea of course integration, the project organized a small focus group meeting with active participants who are also university lecturers. The half-day meeting was conducted on 8 October 2016. The list of participants is shown in Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 List of participants of focus group meeting

Name University

1. Dr. Surachai Sanitjai King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

2. Dr. Atikorn Wongsatanawarid King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

3. Dr. Pisit Yongyingsakthavorn King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok

4. Dr. Chonlakarn Wongkhorsub King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok

5. Dr. Cheema Sorlump Kasetsart University

6. Mr. Rawit Thaweesub Rangsit University

All of the participants supported the idea of producing standard course materials that the lecturers can use freely with granted permission from UNIDO. It was also suggested to disseminate the course materials to other universities in the region to promote EnMS and SO practices.

137


EnMS Course Materials

The project has reviewed and analyzed the training materials for EnMS user training, EnMS technical training and EnMS expert training. Based on the review, the available training materials should cover all aspects of EnMS. However, additional content on the facilities may be required to guide the non-experienced students on the energy components of the factories and how things work in the factory environment.

To gain the lecturer’s perspective on the EnMS course for the undergraduate level, the project conducted an initial survey of the course content. The questionnaire was developed by using the review results of existing training materials and the feedback from the focus group meeting. The primary target group of the initial survey was the lecturer who attended the EnMS training organized by the IEE project. There were 21 participants who identified themselves as lecturers. Consequently, the project sent the questionnaire to them via e-mail. Nine participants returned the filled questionnaires. The project also got the filled questionnaires from two additional lecturers who did not participate in the EnMS training. The analysis of the respondents’ answers was used to design the course structure and content.

Since the course is designed for the 3rd and 4th year undergraduate student, it assumes that the student has a background on the energy-related terminology and basic calculation skills. The student may have no direct experience in utility and production processes, but should have some basic understanding of these processes.

The full content of the course are divided into 6 modules as shown below. - Module 1: Introduction and overview of Energy Management System (EnMS) – 8% - Module 2: Management commitment – 8% - Module 3: Energy Planning – 38% - Module 4: Implementation – 8% - Module 5: Monitoring and evaluation – 30% - Module 6: Management review – 8%

The instructors can either use all 6 modules or some specific modules in their class. The course is designed for a full semester course with 2 to 3 hours per class and one class per week. However, shorter teaching duration is feasible by decreasing the teaching time of each module or selecting only some modules matching the instructor’s objective.

The mixed teaching approaches such as lecture, discussion group and report writing are encouraged to increase the student’s learning experience. The discussion questions and exercises will be included in the slide presentation. Because of the student’s limited experience, the exercise and case study will be designed to facilitate the student through the significant step of energy management system by using the applied information from an actual factory.

The material package contains the following items: - Instruction of using EnMS course material - Syllabus - Presentation for 11 weeks (in ppt and in pdf) - Case study paper mill and data file in excel - Case study kaolin plant and data file in excel - Workshops and assignment - 25 case studies from IEE project - EnMS in brief flyer

138


I.2 SO Course for University



To gain the lecturer’s perspective on the SSO course for the undergraduate level, the project conducted an initial survey of the course’s content. The questionnaire was developed by using the review results of existing training materials and the feedback from the focus group meeting. The primary target group of the initial survey is the lecturer who has attended the SSO training organized by the IEE project. There are 9 participants who identified themselves as the lecturers. Therefore, the project sent the questionnaire to them via e-mail. Five participants returned the filled questionnaire. The analysis of the respondents’ answers was used to design the course structure and content. The draft course outline was sent to an international expert for review. Finally, the course materials were designed by three national trainers.

The material package contains the following items: - Instruction of using SSO course material - Syllabus - Presentation for 11 weeks (in ppt and in pdf) - Case study - Workshops and assignment - SSST excel file (in Thai) - Short video to demonstrate the equipment usage

Final Report Industrial Energy E˜ciency Project in Thailand

Documents

Transcript of Final Report Industrial Energy E˜ciency Project in Thailand