Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

download Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

of 29

Transcript of Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    1/29

    SCOPE OF WORK

    Phase I Environmental Site Assessments

    Date: July 12, 2004

    NOMURACREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    2 WORLD FINANCIALCENTER, BUILDINGB

    NEWYORK, NEWYORK 10281-1198

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    2/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    i

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    1.0 Introduction.............................. ........................................................ ...................................... 1

    1.1 Objective ................................................. ....................................................... ........... 11.2 The Consultant.................................................. ........................................................ . 21.3 Updated Report.............................. ........................................................ .................... 2

    2.0 Scope of Work......................... ........................................................ ...................................... 3

    2.1 Document Review and Interviews... ........................................................ .................... 32.1.2 General................................................. ........................................................ . 32.1.3 Government Agency Provided Information................................... .................... 42.1.4 Use and Ownership History ........................................................ .................... 62.1.5 Physical Setting Sources .................................................... ............................. 82.1.6 Zoning Designation................................................... ...................................... 9

    2.2 Walk-Through Survey............................................................................. .................... 9

    2.2.1 General................................................. ........................................................ . 92.2.2 General Site Setting .................................................. .................................... 102.2.3 Interior and Exterior Observations ............................................... .................. 122.2.4 Interior Observations ................................................ .................................... 142.2.5 Exterior Observations ........................................................ ........................... 15

    3.0 Special Criteria ..................................................... ....................................................... ......... 16

    3.1 Asbestos .................................................. ....................................................... ......... 163.2 Lead.............................................. ........................................................ .................. 173.3 Radon...................................................... ....................................................... ......... 173.4 Vehicle Lifts ..................................................... ....................................................... 183.5

    Dry Cleaners..................................................... ....................................................... 18

    3.6 Mold......... ........................................................ ....................................................... 19

    4.0 Interviews............. ........................................................ ....................................................... 21

    4.1 Site Personnel................................................... ....................................................... 214.2 Federal, State Provincial and Local Officials............................................. .................. 224.3 Third Party Personnel............................................................................. .................. 224.4 Prior Assessment Usage ....................................................... .................................... 22

    5.0 Preparation of a Report..................................................................... .................................... 22

    5.1 Executive Summary................................................................................ .................. 235.1.1 General Description...................... ....................................................... ......... 23

    5.1.2 Conclusions .................................................... .............................................. 235.1.3 Project Summary Schedule.. ........................................................ .................. 235.1.4 Recommendations .................................................... .................................... 235.1.5 Operations and Maintenance Plans ....................................................... ......... 245.1.6 Cost Estimates ............................................... .............................................. 24

    5.2 Salient Building Facts................................ ....................................................... ......... 245.3 Purpose and Scope ..................................................... .............................................. 245.6 Exhibits...................................................................... .............................................. 25

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    3/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    ii

    5.6.1 Photographs ................................................... .............................................. 255.6.2 Additional Supporting Documentation............................................................. 255.6.3 Questionnaire................................................. .............................................. 26

    Appendix

    Sample Pre-Survey Questionnaire

    Sample Dry Cleaner Checklist

    Recommended Scope of Work for Phase II ESA involving Dry Cleaners

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    4/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    1

    1.0 Introduction

    The purpose of this guide is to define expected and customary practice for conducting Phase I

    Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) on behalf of Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc. Nomura

    Credit & Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, NCCI), its successors and assigns, ratingagencies and certain investors involved in the Securitization (as defined below) or other disposition,

    will use and rely upon this Report in connection with a planned securitization involving the Subject,

    or a whole loan sale or other disposition of the related loan (collectively the Securitization),

    NCCI, may at its option elect to include selected information in the Report in the offering

    memorandum or other disclosure materials relating to the Securitization.

    The minimum criteria shall be American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 1527-00

    Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments:

    Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, which have been enhanced to meet NCCI

    requirements. The specific enhancements are described below. For specific clarification, refer to

    the published ASTM guidelines. The report shall be prepared in connection with the proposedrefinancing or financing of all property types (herein referred to as Subject). All ESAs

    submitted by Consultant shall comply with the Scope of Work.

    1.1 Objective

    The purpose of the ESA is to observe and report, to the extent feasible pursuant

    to the processes prescribed herein, recognized environmental conditions in con-

    nection with the Subject and identify those areas of environmental uncertainty that

    warrant further investigation or clarification. The Report will identify those areas

    that will require remedial repair work and will assign them an associated esti-

    mated remedial cost.

    The ESA will be based upon six components:

    Documentation Review

    Walk-Through Survey

    Special Criteria (Asbestos, Lead, Radon, Dry Cleaners, Vehicle Lifts, Mold,

    etc.)

    Interviews

    Preparation of a Report

    Without limiting the foregoing, the purpose of a Phase I Environmental Site As-sessment (ESA) is to determine the likelihood that environmental contamination

    exists at the Subject due to current or previous activities on or in the vicinity of the

    Subject. Based on the results of the ESA, the Consultant will state their conclu-

    sions concerning potential environmental liability, the likelihood of any environ-

    mental contamination at or surrounding the Subject and compliance with environ-

    mental and health and safety laws and regulations. The Consultant will make a

    recommendation regarding the need for any additional due diligence (e.g., soil

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    5/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    2

    and/or groundwater sampling). The ESA shall be completed subject to the most

    current ASTM standards and this Scope of Work.

    1.2 The Consultant

    Approved Consultants will be selected by NCCI based upon the firms experience

    with conducting ESAs for securitizations, national recognition, and a consistent

    track record of providing a high quality product that is generally well-received by

    NCCI, the rating agencies, and investors that rely on these reports. It is our intent

    to obtain a consistent level of reporting and standard formatting from a limited list

    of approved Consultants. It is recognized, however, that the qualifications of the

    Consultant are highly dependent on many factors that may include professional

    education, training, experience, certification or professional licensing/registration

    of both the Consultants field observers and the ESA reviewer. It is further rec-

    ognized that the Consultant has the responsibility to select, engage, or employ the

    field observer and the ESA reviewer with appropriate credentials. Notwithstand-

    ing, the Consultant shall carry the following minimum insurance coverage:

    Type of Coverage Coverage Amount

    Workers Compensation Statutory Limits

    General Liability $1,000,000 per claim / $2,000,000 aggregate

    Umbrella $2,000,000

    Automobile $1,000,000

    Professional Liability (E&O) $2,000,000 per claim and aggregate

    Approved Consultants will be asked to execute a Standard Master Agreement

    with NCCI and to provide evidence of the foregoing coverage. All Consultants

    will be retained directly by NCCI.

    Although, it is NCCIs intent to obtain a consistent level of reporting and standard

    formatting from a limited list of approved Consultants, from time-to-time, NCCI

    may accept an existing report prepared by a Consultant not on NCCIs approved

    list at the time such report is prepared, provided: (i) the report conforms with the

    Scope of Work identified in this guide, (ii) the Consultants qualifications and insur-

    ance coverage meet NCCI criteria, (iii) the report is certified to NCCI, including

    NCCIs standard reliance language, (iv) the report is reviewed by a Consultant

    from NCCIs approved list for conformance with NCCIs Scope of Work and

    customary industry standards, (v) the existing report was prepared by prior to

    NCCI considering financing, and preparation a new report would cause unduecost or hardship to the property owner, and (vi) the existing report was prepared

    within the past six(6) months.

    1.3 Updated Report

    Updated reports are not acceptable. The ESA must be completed in

    accordance with this scope of work. Worthy of note; however, the use of prior

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    6/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    3

    reports in connection with preparation of this ESA is acceptable, and there is no

    need to re-do work presented in a previous report, provided that the information

    contained in the reports are reliable and proper supporting documentation is

    provided so that the Consultant would come to the same independent conclusion.

    For example, if the Consultant is relying on historical photographs from a previous

    report, the photos must be included and in sufficient detail so the Consultant wouldreasonably come to the same independent conclusion. Previous reports

    referenced in the ESA must be included in the report.

    2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

    2.1 Document Review and Interviews

    2.1.2 General

    The objective of the document review and interviews is to augment the

    walk-through survey and to assist the Consultants understanding of the

    Subject and identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection

    with the Subject. Prior to conducting the walk-through survey, the Con-

    sultant is to provide the borrower with a Questionnaire, which are to be

    completed by the borrower or its representative and forwarded to the

    Consultant. The Questionnaire will be included as an Exhibit to the Con-

    sultants report.

    The Consultant should make appropriate inquiries and review only such

    record information that is reasonably ascertainable from standard

    sources. If information is not practically reviewable or not provided to

    the Consultant in a reasonable time for the Consultant to formulate an

    opinion and complete the ESA, such fact should be stated in the ESA and

    the Consultant is to have no further obligation of retrieving such docu-

    mentation or reviewing it if it is subsequently provided. Nevertheless, if

    pursuant to the Consultant's appropriate inquiry, material information is

    received by the Consultant contemporaneous to the preparation of the

    ESA, but too late to be included in the report, the Consultant should for-

    ward it to the NCCI with a cover letter clearly defining the assessed

    property and a description of the attached information..

    Information typically requested from the borrower, or the borrowers rep-resentative include:

    Previously Prepared ESAs

    Safety Inspection Reports

    Asbestos Surveys

    Lead Paint Surveys of Inspection Reports

    Operation & Maintenance Plans for Lead or Asbestos

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    7/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    4

    Underground/Aboveground Storage Tank Registrations

    Waste Disposal Records

    Environmental Permits

    Deed Restrictions or Environmental Liens

    Historical and Current Tenants Listing

    Outstanding citations for environmental violations Chain-of-Title

    Leasing literature, listing for sale, marketing/promotion literature, floor

    plans, etc.

    Building and Site Plan

    2.1.3 Government Agency Provided Information

    Consultant shall solicit and obtain information or other record information

    from government agencies or from commercial services. Records per-

    taining to the Subject site as well as adjacent and surrounding propertiesshall be reviewed and an evaluation of potential impacts to the Subject

    site shall be performed.

    2.1.3.1 Database Review

    A database search including a review of all applicable federal,

    state and local agency files shall be conducted in order to identify

    potential environmental concerns or public health concerns asso-

    ciated with the Subject site as well as adjacent and surrounding

    properties within the approximate minimum search distances as

    outlined in the ASTM Standard E 1527-00 or the most recent re-

    vision.

    The database search shall include a compilation, summary and

    reduction of data and an evaluation of the potential impacts to the

    Subject. Orphaned (also known as unplottable) sites must be ad-

    dressed within the contents of the report.

    The Consultant must determine the potential impact on the

    Subject from hazardous waste activities at neighboring properties.

    The Consultant must review the most recent information

    available on waste sites within one mile of the Subject. This

    information may be obtained from state and federal

    environmental protection agencies. The Consultant mustcomment on the impact of these sites on the Subject and explain

    the rationale for Consultant's opinion.

    The Consultant must review at least the following data sources.

    Search radii must comply with ASTM 1527-2001:

    Federal National Priorities List (NPL or Superfund).

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    8/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    5

    Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,

    Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS).

    Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities list.

    Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list. Federal

    ERNS list.

    State lists of hazardous waste sites identified for investigationor remediation; State-equivalent NPL.

    State-equivalent CERCLIS.

    State landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists State

    registered UST lists for the Subject and adjoining properties.

    State leaking UST lists. For identified LUSTs, the Consultant

    should note (i) if it is up-gradient, down-gradient, or

    cross-gradient to the Subject; (ii) the current status of

    remediation; and, (iii) the probability of contamination to the

    Subject.

    2.1.3.2 Agency F il e Review

    Reasonably ascertainable files pertaining to the Subject site shall

    be reviewed. Reasonably ascertainable files pertaining to adja-

    cent and surrounding sites identified as showing evidence of po-

    tential environmental concern shall be reviewed to evaluate po-

    tential impacts to the Subject site. This information may include

    the following: distance from Subject site, hydraulic gradient from

    the Subject site, type and extent of known contamination,

    groundwater flow direction, regulatory status of issue, type of

    remediation activities being performed or proposed, the status of

    any remedial activities, and the likelihood of impact to the Subjectsite, etc.

    2.1.3.3 Envir onmental Records Main tained On-Site

    Environmental records maintained at the Subject site or available

    from the site contact shall be reviewed. These records shall in-

    clude, but may not necessarily be limited to: asbestos surveys,

    Phase I or Phase II Assessments; contamination assessment re-

    ports, remedial action workplans; underground storage tank regis-

    tration; leak detection monitoring; construction materials; system

    design details; installation details; installation dates; closuredocumentation; vehicle lift and other equipment maintenance re-

    cords, frequency of maintenance, removal/decommissioning

    documentation including any analytical results; previous environ-

    mental site assessments; oil-water separator and/or similar drain-

    age unit service records including draining, cleaning, and inspec-

    tion records; waste disposal documentation; environmental com-

    pliance, etc.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    9/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    6

    2.1.3.4 Envir onmental Records Obtained From Other Sources

    Pertinent environmental records from sources other than those

    discussed above may be available and shall be reviewed. These

    other sources may include, but may not necessarily be limited to:

    previous site owner/operator(s); site with business associations tothe Subject site (i.e., headquarters site, another dealership with

    the same owner as the Subject site, etc.); adjacent and surround-

    ing property owner/operator(s), etc.

    2.1.3.5 Additi onal Environmental Record Sources

    One or more additional state or local source of environmental re-

    cords should be checked, if readily available, in accordance with

    ASTM Guidelines, to enhance and supplement federal and state

    sources identified above. Some types of records and sources

    that may be reviewed include: Department of

    Health/Environmental Division; Fire Department; Engineering

    Department; Planning Department; Building Department; Tax

    Assessor; Local Pollution Control Agency; Local Water Quality

    Agency; and Local Electric Utility Company.

    2.1.4 Use and Ownership History

    2.1.4.1 General

    All obvious uses of the Subject and surrounding properties shall

    be established from the present back to the Subjects obvious

    first developed use or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. The

    purpose of this review will be to identify potential sources of

    contamination from historic site or neighboring site usage.

    Particular attention should be focused on identifying past owners

    or operations at the site that may have generated, treated, stored

    or disposed of solid, hazardous or radioactive wastes, substances

    or materials.

    All relevant information sources should be investigated to come

    to a definitive determination. The following is a list of

    recommended information sources to be used in making thisdetermination.

    Chain of Title

    A chain of title search dating back to at least 1940 or a review of

    readily accessible ownership records shall be performed at the

    Subject site, if this information is reasonably ascertainable. Re-

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    10/29

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    11/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    8

    Readily available historic maps such as Bromley Maps, Real

    Property Maps and 7.5 Minute Series USGS Topographic Maps

    should be reviewed as part of the assessment.

    Prior Assessments

    Standard Historical sources reviewed as part of a prior environ-

    mental site assessments do not need to be searched or reviewed

    again, provided the information is determined to be reliable and

    the adequate supporting documentation is provided to reproduce

    the same result, if the research was independently conducted by

    the Consultant. However, uses of the Subject since the prior

    assessment should be identified either through standard historical

    sources.

    Other H istorical Sources

    Other credible sources can be used to identify the prior uses of

    the Subject . The category includes, but is not limited to miscel-

    laneous maps, newspaper archives, and the records in the files

    and/or personal knowledge of the property owner and/or occu-

    pants.

    2.1.5 Physical Setting Sources

    2.1.5.1 Topographi cal Map

    A current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographical Map (or equivalent)

    showing the area on which the Subject is located shall be re-

    viewed. One or more additional physical setting sources may be

    reviewed.

    2.1.5.2 F lood Zones

    The Consultant is to note whether the Subject encroaches upon

    the 100-year flood area designated as Special Flood Hazard Ar-

    eas Inundated by 100-Year Flood on FEMA maps, as amended.

    2.1.5.3 Soil Maps

    If maps are readily available, a discussion should be included of

    the soil information, including, soil types, slope, drainage, texture,

    depth, permeability, soil reaction, and depth to the seasonal water

    table.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    12/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    9

    2.1.5.4 Bedrock/surf icial Geology maps

    If maps are readily available, a discussion should be included of

    the geology including physiographic province, formation, material

    type, and thickness.

    2.1.5.5 Groundwater Maps

    If maps are readily available, a discussion should be included of

    the hydrology including source, aquifer formation, and estimated

    ground water level. The local and site specific expected

    groundwater flow direction and depth shall be determined or in-

    ferred based on existing data specific to the Subject site or local

    area data. If site specific or local data is not available, the

    groundwater flow direction and depth shall be estimated.

    2.1.6 Zoning Designation

    The Consultant is to identify the zoning designation of the Sub-

    ject.

    2.2 Walk-Through Survey

    2.2.1 General

    The Consultant shall perform a complete walkthrough of the entire prop-

    erty and a representative number of tenant spaces or apartments. The

    Consultant shall make appropriate attempts to obtain access to all portionsof the Subject site and shall note any limitations of access to the Subject

    site.

    For complexes with multiple buildings, the exterior envelopes of all resi-

    dential buildings should be surveyed. For complexes built in phases, each

    construction phase should be surveyed. Representative observation of

    the interiors should include a mix of units, which are occupied, vacant,

    damaged, and under renovation or repair. Representative observation of

    the interiors of each construction phase should include a sufficient num-

    ber of top and bottom floors. Generally, a representative number of units

    shall consist of 10% of all occupied, 100% vacant, and 100% damaged ordown units. The consultant may use their professional judgement for lar-

    ger properties, greater than 200 units, if it is determined that the units are

    typical, based upon their inspection of at least 5% of the occupied units.

    All vacant and down units should be observed.

    For non-residential properties or buildings built in phases, each construc-

    tion phase should be surveyed. For a property that contains multiple

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    13/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    10

    buildings, the concept of representative observations extend to each build-

    ing individually and not to all buildings as a whole. Representative obser-

    vations should include a mix of tenants (occupied and unoccupied) and

    common areas. The Consultant shall include a tabular list of the tenants

    names and use of the Project. Operational activities of environmental

    concern should be discussed, such as industrial processes, dry cleaning,etc. Industrial processes should be discussed from raw material stage to

    the finished product. Any required permits should also be discussed.

    To the extent that the following items are visually and/or physically ob-

    served on the site visit, or identified in the interviews or records review,

    they shall be identified in the report.

    2.2.2 General Site Setting

    2.2.2.1 Curr ent Use of the Subject PropertyThe current use(s) of the Subject shall be identified in the report.

    Any current uses of the Subject likely to involve the use, storage,

    treatment, disposal, or generation of hazardous substances or

    petroleum products shall be identified. Unoccupied spaces should

    be noted. In identifying the current uses of theSubject, more

    specific information is more helpful than less specific information.

    2.2.2.2 Past Use of the Subject Property

    To the extent that past uses of properties are visually and/or

    physically observed on the site visit or are identified in theinterviews or records review, they shall be identified in the report.

    Current uses identified shall be described in the report if they are

    likely to indicate a recognized environmental condition.

    2.2.2.3 Cur rent use of Adjoini ng Properti es

    To the extent that current uses of adjoining properties are visually

    and/or physically observed on the site visit, or are identified in the

    interviews or records review, they shall be identified in the report.

    Current uses so identified shall be described in the report if they

    are likely to indicate a recognized environmental condition.

    2.2.2.4 Past use of Adjoin ing Properties

    To the extent that past uses of adjoining properties are visually

    and/or physically observed on the site visit, or are identified in the

    interviews or records review, they shall be identified in the report.

    Past uses identified shall be described in the report if they are

    likely to indicate a recognized environmental condition.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    14/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    11

    2.2.2.5 Cur rent or Past Uses of the Sur rounding Ar ea

    To the extent that current and past uses of the surrounding area

    is visually and/or physically observed on the site visit, or are

    identified in the interviews or records review, they shall be

    identified in the report. Past uses identified shall be described in

    the report if they are likely to indicate a recognized environmentalcondition.

    2.2.2.6 Geologic, Hydrogeologic, Hydrauli c, and Topographi cal

    Conditions

    The topographic conditions of the Subject shall be noted to the

    extent visually and/or physically observed or determined through

    interviews, as well the general topography of the surrounding

    area. If any information obtained shows there are likely to be

    hazardous substances of petroleum on the property or on nearby

    properties and those hazardous substance may migrate,topographic observations should be analyzed in connection with

    geologic, hydrogeologic, and topographic information obtained

    pursuant to the Record Review and Interviews to evaluate

    whether hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to

    migrate to the Subject, or within or from the Subject, into

    groundwater or soil.

    2.2.2.7 General Description of the Structures

    The report shall generally describe the structures or other

    improvements on the property, for example: number of buildings,

    stories, age, ancillary structures, heating and cooling systems, etc.

    2.2.2.8 Roads

    Public streets adjoining the Subject shall be identified in the report

    and any roads, streets, and parking facilities on the property shall

    be described in the report.

    2.2.2.9 Potable Water Supply

    The Consultant must identify the drinking water supplier and

    verify with the supplier that the water quality is acceptable ac-

    cording to federal and/or local guidelines as described below. If

    the Subject is on a municipal system, the drinking water does not

    need to be tested for lead or other impurities unless lead piping is

    utilized (including water fountain supply lines).

    If the Subject is not provided with municipal water or if lead

    piping is utilized, drinking water samples for the Subject must be

    obtained, tested and compared to State drinking water quality

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    15/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    12

    standards to determine whether compliance is currently being

    achieved. If a State program does not exist, Federal Safe

    Drinking Water Act standards apply.

    2.2.10 Sewage Disposal Systems

    The sewage disposal system shall be identified in the report.

    Inquiry shall be made as to the age of the system, specific

    mention to on-site treatment facilities or septic systems should be

    made.

    2.2.3 Interior and Exterior Observations

    2.2.3.1 Cur rent Use of the Subject

    The current use(s) of the Subject shall be identified in the report.

    Any current uses of the Subject likely to involve the use storage,

    treatment, disposal, or generation of hazardous substances orpetroleum products shall be identified. Unoccupied spaces should

    be noted. In identifying the current uses of the Subject, more

    specific information is more helpful than less specific information.

    2.2.3.2 Past Use of the Subject

    To the extent that past uses of properties are visually and/or

    physically observed on the site visit, or are identified in the

    interviews or records review, they shall be identified in the report,

    and current uses so identified shall be described in the report if

    they are likely to indicate a recognized environmental condition.

    2.2.3.3 Hazardous Substances

    To the extent that present uses are identified that store, treat or

    dispose of or generate hazardous substances and petroleum

    products on the property, hazardous substances and petroleum

    products shall be identified in the report and the approximate

    quantities involved, container, and storage condition described in

    the report. Conditions that do not appear to conform with good

    commercial, customary practice, or regulation should be noted.

    2.2.3.4 Storage Tanks

    Aboveground

    The Consultant shall observe and note the presence and location

    of all aboveground storage tanks and storage areas.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    16/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    13

    The Consultant shall observe and note the presence of secondary

    containment around each aboveground storage tank and storage

    area.

    The Consultant shall visually inspect and note the integrity of

    each aboveground storage tank, container and secondary con-tainment structure (if present) in each storage area.

    The Consultant shall visually inspect each tank and container and

    the surface beneath each tank and container for evidence of

    staining or a release that may indicate a potential environmental

    impact. If staining or a release is observed, the Consultant shall

    visually inspect and note the integrity and type of the pavement

    material including the presence of cracks, expansion joints, de-

    grading material and floor drains that may indicate a potential re-

    lease to the subsurface.

    Underground

    The Consultant shall observe and note the locations of all under-

    ground storage tanks at the Subject . This shall include the loca-

    tions of all currently operating, inactive, temporarily out of ser-

    vice, abandoned and removed underground storage tanks.

    The Consultant shall evaluate the operational status or closure

    status of each tank. If the tank is active, the Consultant shall

    opine as to the tanks expected useful life. If the tank is inactive,

    the Consultant shall, if possible, evaluate if the tank has remaining

    product or has been filled with concrete, grout, sand, etc.

    The Consultant shall evaluate the regulatory compliance of each

    underground storage tank. This shall include, but may not neces-

    sarily be limited to, the following: review of tank registration

    documents; visually inspecting and noting the presence or ab-

    sence of overfill protection; leak detection; corrosion protection,

    etc.

    The Consultant shall visually inspect and note the condition of the

    soil and pavement surrounding each tank for evidence of staining

    and overfilling which may indicate a potential environmental im-pact. If staining or evidence of overfilling is present, the Consult-

    ant shall note the integrity and type of the pavement material in-

    cluding the presence of cracks, degrading material and expansion

    joints that may indicate a release to the subsurface environment.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    17/29

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    18/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    15

    2.2.4.2 Stains or Corrosion

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews, stains or corrosion on floors, wall, and ceilings shall be

    described in the report, except staining from water.

    2.2.4.3 Drains or Sumps

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews, floor drains and sumps shall be described in the

    report.

    2.2.5 Exterior Observations

    2.2.5.1 Pits, Ponds or lagoons

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews or records review, pits, pond, and lagoons on the

    property shall be described in the report, particularly if they are in

    connection with waste disposal or waste streams.

    2.2.5.2 Stained Soil or Pavement

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews, stained soil or pavement shall be described in the

    report.

    2.2.5.3 Stressed Vegetation

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews, material stressed vegetation shall be described in the

    report.

    2.2.5.4 Solid Waste

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews or records, areas that are apparently filled or graded

    by non-natural causes suggesting trash or other solid waste

    disposal, or mounds or depressions suggesting trash or other solid

    waste disposal, shall be described in the report. In addition thelocation of trash dumpsters, compactors, or disposal areas should

    be identified, including any indication of improper storage.

    2.2.5.5 Waste Water

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews or records review, waste water or other liquid

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    19/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    16

    (including storm water) or any discharge into a drain, ditch, or

    stream on or adjacent to the property shall be described in the

    report.

    2.2.5.6 Wells

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews or records review all wells (including dry wells,

    irrigation wells, injection wells, abandoned wells, other wells, or

    irrigation wells shall be described in the report.

    2.2.5.7 Septic Systems

    To the extent visually and/or physically observed or identified in

    interviews or records review all indications of on-site septic

    systems or cesspools should be described in the report.

    3.0 SPECIAL CRITERIA

    3.1 Asbestos

    If warranted by the age of the related building(s), the Consultant must inspect the

    Subject for asbestos-containing materials (ACM). The purpose of the

    inspection is to discover whether significant quantities of ACM were used in the

    construction of the building or added subsequently and to determine the

    approximate quantity and condition of such materials. As discussed in "Guidance

    for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings," EPA 56015-85-024(June 1985) ("Purple Book"), particular attention during the inspection must be

    focused on identifying asbestos-containing pipe and boiler insulation,

    texture-finished ceiling and wall materials (popcorn type) and sprayed or

    troweled-on structural coverings. Friable ACM (that is, material that releases

    fibers when subjected to finger pressure) is of greatest concern.

    Samples of materials suspected of containing asbestos must be collected, if

    possible, by methods that do not show visible destruction, and should be analyzed

    by a qualified professional utilizing polarized light microscopy and dispersion

    staining. The number and quantity of samples must be sufficient to provide

    meaningful results. For all Subjects, the number of samples taken must be basedon the number of suspected materials observed. If the Consultant determines the

    Subject to be free of ACM, the Consultant will so certify such within the report.

    The Consultant shall develop and provide, upon request, an operations and

    maintenance (O&M) program to maintain in place any ACMs that are

    determined to be in good condition. All recommendations are to be made in light

    of existing local asbestos handling regulations and must include the cost for

    additional testing or remediation, if any.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    20/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    17

    The report must include tabulations of the type of material, exact location of the

    sample, condition and approximate quantity of the material, and asbestos

    concentration. If samples are positive, photographs of typical conditions of the

    areas tested must be included. A copy of the laboratory analytical report must be

    appended to the ESA.

    3.2 Lead

    For multifamily projects, residential properties, schools, churches, and day care

    centers only, the Consultant must test assets built before 1978 for the presence of

    LBP.

    An adequate number of samples must be collected commensurate with the

    Subjects size to establish the content and condition of lead based paint. If the

    Subject was a multi-phased project, all phases should be covered in the sampling.

    However, if certain phases were constructed post 1978 it is not necessary to test

    them. Between a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 30 samples must becollected, at a minimum of 10 samples per 100 units. In addition, the Subject shall

    be tested in one of the following forms depending upon which form shall be more

    suitable: 1) chemical reaction swabs (which indicate a presence of lead in excess

    of .5% lead by dry weight), 2) XRF (X-ray Fluorescence Technology) and/or 3)

    laboratory analysis of chip samples using Atomic Absorption Spectrometer in

    accordance with ASTM D3335-85a. Set forth below are suggested surfaces to

    be analyzed:

    Doors and door frames

    Painted woodwork

    Stair railings

    Chair rails

    Window frames, wells and sills

    Walls

    Any areas of flaking and chipping paint

    Exterior hand railings and playground equipment

    Other painted surfaces that could be identified as chewable to a child

    (typically within 4 feet of the finished floor)

    The results of the testing are to be included in the written report along with

    recommendations for either no further action, additional testing, remediation or

    implementation of a lead based paint O&M program. All recommendations are tobe made in light of existing local lead based paint regulations and must include the

    cost for additional testing, remediation of the implementation of an O&M

    program.

    3.3 Radon

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    21/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    18

    Record searches must be completed for multifamily projects, residential proper-

    ties, schools, churches, and day care centers only, to determine extent of radon

    gas in the Subjects geographical area. If the Subject is in an area of known pro-

    pensity of accumulation and exposure, based upon review of records, testing must

    be completed to determine if the Subject is experiencing radon levels above the

    maximum allowable level, as established by the EPA, of 4 Pci/L per million. If itis determined that the Subject is experiencing higher than maximum allowable

    levels of radon gas than the Consultant shall recommend additional investigation

    or a probable solution to the problem along with the costs to cure.

    3.4 Vehicle Lifts

    The Consultant shall observe and note the presence, location and type of all

    currently operating and former vehicle lifts. The Consultant shall determine if

    these vehicle lifts are underground hydraulic lifts or aboveground lift units and if

    any subsurface components are associated with each type of these vehicle lifts.

    The Consultant shall visually observe and note areas of patched concrete or pav-

    ing in the buildings that may potentially indicate locations of former vehicle lifts.

    3.5 Dry Cleaners

    NCCI shall be advised by the Consultant, through its due diligence, as to the exis-

    tence or former existence of on-site dry cleaning operations. If operations are or

    were found to exist on site then the following scope of work shall apply and be

    initiated after first consulting with NCCI. The review of all current and past ten-

    ants must be performed to determine the existence of current or previous dry

    cleaning activities.

    In an effort to establish a uniform approach to dry cleaning issues, NCCI recom-

    mends the following approach with regard to the performance of on-site dry

    cleaning. The purpose is to make sure our liability is limited, to a reasonable extent

    without going overboard with Phase II recommendations. In each case, a dry

    cleaning Checklist should be completed for each operational dry cleaner.

    Operational dry cleaning facilities which have either been present on a prop-

    erty for more than 5 years and/or have had more than one owner/operator

    will be considered a recognized environmental condition and warrant further

    evaluation. Additionally, if a dry cleaner operated on the property and is nolonger present, this would be considered a recognized environmental condition

    and further evaluation would be warranted.

    It should be noted that this policy is NOT intended to exempt dry cleaning fa-

    cilities which have not been present for more than five years from scrutiny

    and independent conclusions and recommendations. A recent (< 5 yrs.) dry

    cleaning operation will be expected to have appropriate secondary contain-

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    22/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    19

    ment, identification and appropriate disposal of all hazardous waste streams,

    and appropriate training/maintenance records for all dry cleaning equipment

    that use PCE. The Consultant should affirmatively state these conditions ex-

    ist in the report.

    The Consultant will verify that the dry cleaner is operating in compliance with allapplicable Federal, State and Local laws. This includes, but is not limited to, any

    dry cleaning program that each State may have.

    Based upon a thorough field investigation of the surrounding area and examination

    of waste manifests, etc. the Consultant shall make a determination as to whether

    or not it is evident the dry cleaning establishment has conducted business without

    incident or detriment to the environment.

    If it is determined, through thorough investigation, that the dry cleaning establish-

    ment has not apparently contaminated the environment then no further action is

    required by NCCI. Notwithstanding, NCCI may require dry-cleaning establish-

    ments to maintain an acceptable secondary containment system for storage drumsand any dry-cleaning equipment if deemed necessary by federal, state or local or-

    dinances.

    If identifiable risks are found to be evident with the handling practices, age, or

    day to day operations of the dry cleaning establishment and, in the Consultants

    opinion, those practices or operations may have detrimentally affected the envi-

    ronment then a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment may be warranted.

    3.6 Mold

    A limited Mold Screening evaluation must be performed. The purpose of this task is

    to provide limited property investigation to allow the NCCI to evaluate the potential

    impacts of mold-related issues concerning the Property. The screening involves a

    visual assessment for water-damaged areas, and a visual inspection for mold coloni-

    zation and areas of amplification (Scope Abelow). Additionally, consultant will rec-

    ommend response actions based on the results of visible observations and sampling,

    if performed. It should be noted that a recommendation for additional investigation

    and sampling may be warranted in certain situations.

    As an option, NCCI may request non-culturable sampling to be performed that will

    allow identification of genus, and relative density of mold spores on the area affected

    (Scopes Aand B, below). As there are currently no regulatory guidelines concerning

    exposure to mold, these sampling results can provide useful information regarding

    the aggressiveness of mold growth.

    A) V isual I nspection: Consultant will inspect interior building components for con-

    spicuous visual indications of mold growth and/or water damage.

    For multi-family properties, consultant will inspect the following building

    components/areas in the representative number of units inspected (typically 10%):

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    23/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    20

    - Interior walls and ceilings (bathrooms, kitchens and bedrooms);

    - In-unit and common mechanical closets;

    - Areas under kitchen and bathroom sinks;

    - Flat roofs (for evidence of water ponding);

    - Operative status of ventilation equipment (kitchen and bathroom fans).

    For retail, office and industrial properties, consultant will inspect the following

    building components/areas:

    - Interior walls and ceilings;

    - Mechanical rooms;

    - Flat roofs (for evidence of water ponding).

    Additionally, for both property types, consultant will perform the following tasks:

    1) Interview the site contact for information related to water damage/intrusion,

    mold growth, and tenant complaints;

    2) Interview the site contact for information related to maintenance responsibility

    (outsourced or in-house staff) history of HVAC equipment, and whether any

    operational problems related to moisture accumulation have been identified;

    3) Note the presence of olfactory indications of mold (musty odors);

    4) Photograph all affected areas observed.

    The following activities are excluded from the scope of this limited mold screening.

    These activities should not be construed as all-inclusive, nor is it implied that any

    exclusion not specifically noted below is a requirement of this screening:

    Providing an opinion on the health effects of mold;

    Identifying the source of moisture or water leaks conducive to mold growth and

    amplification;

    Entering of crawl or confined space areas, or determination of previous sub-

    structure flooding or water penetration unless easily visible or if such informa-

    tion is provided;

    Walking on pitched roofs, or any roof areas that appear to be unsafe, or roofs

    with no built-in access;

    Observation of flue connections, interiors of chimneys, flues or boiler stacks, or

    tenant owned or maintained equipment;

    Removing or relocating materials, furniture, storage containers, personal effects,

    debris material or finishes that obstruct access or visibility;

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    24/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    21

    Conducting exploratory probing or testing of materials or equipment, or disman-

    tling or operating of equipment or appliances;

    Reporting on the condition of subterranean or concealed conditions, as well as

    items or systems that are not permanently installed or are tenant owned and

    maintained;

    Entering or accessing any area of the Property deemed by consultants inspec-

    tor to pose a threat to the safety of any individual or to the integrity of any build-

    ing system or material.

    B) Sampling Option: When the conspicuous presence of mold growth is observed

    through visual analysis (as described in Scope A, above), consultant may con-

    duct limited non-culturable bulk sampling, via tape lift method of each affected

    area, or recommend further investigation by a mold remediation specialist

    4.0 INTERVIEWS

    Interviews shall be conducted in person, by phone or in writing. Proper supporting

    documentation should be provided for all interviews, which should be included in the ESA

    report. Questions shall pertain to current and historical activities and events that indicate

    potential environmental concerns at the Subject site and adjacent and surrounding proper-

    ties. This information shall be used to supplement information obtained through the

    Records Review and Site Visit.

    In the case of referrals made to other people or agencies, the Consultant shall make

    follow-up inquiries, when appropriate. To the extent practical, persons interviewed as a

    result of previous environmental site assessments shall be questioned again about newinformation learned since the prior assessment.

    The following list of sources and types of information to be investigated is not intended to

    be a complete list and only serves as a guide for the completion of this task.

    4.1 Site Personnel

    Site personnel interviewed shall include, but may not necessarily be limited to, the

    site manager, maintenance personnel, employees, occupants, tenants, etc. At a

    minimum, the Consultant shall request information concerning the following:

    Location, age, and construction materials of all former and current above and be-

    low ground storage tanks, in addition to staining and leaks associated with any and

    all tanks on the subject property.

    Location, age and installation design of all former and current vehicle lifts, opera-

    tion and maintenance records of vehicle lifts including frequency, amounts of flu-

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    25/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    22

    ids added, reported leaks, and decommissioning and removal activities including

    analytical results.

    Information concerning historical or current releases to the environment for the

    subject site and adjacent and surrounding properties.

    Pertinent information regarding the construction, modification and renovation of

    the facility, the presence of former and current utilities and other processes or ac-

    tivities which may indicate evidence of potential releases to the environment.

    Location, age, construction materials, maintenance and operation information of

    all former and current product/waste storage areas and drainage systems.

    4.2 Federal, State Provincial and Local Officials

    Officials interviewed shall include, but may not necessarily be limited to, representativesof the local fire department, representatives from the local health agency, representatives

    from the building, planning, utilities departments, etc., and representatives from the agency

    is responsible for environmental matters (i.e., concerning spills, releases, violations,

    permits, etc.).

    4.3 Third Party Personnel

    Interviews with third party personnel shall include, but may not necessarily be lim-

    ited to, former site owners, nearby property owners, former employees, tenants,

    etc.

    4.4 Prior Assessment Usage

    Persons interviewed as part of a prior Phase I Environmental Site assessments

    consistent with this Scope of Work and ASTM Standard 1527 do not need to be

    questioned again about the contents of their answers they provided at the time.

    However, they should be questioned about new information learned since that

    time, or other questions about conditions since the prior Phase I Environmental

    Site Assessment.

    5.0 PREPARATION OF A REPORT

    Consultant shall prepare a report describing the procedures, observations, and recommen-

    dation. It is the desire of NCCI to obtain similar report formats for ease of use and

    consistent reporting. Accordingly, NCCI recommends using ASTM Standard 1527 as a

    guide. Notwithstanding, the format, each report must contain the following essential

    elements.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    26/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    23

    5.1 Executive Summary

    5.1.1 General Description

    The opening paragraph should identify the Subject, and provide pertinentinformation such as use, size, age, location, construction type, design style,

    and apparent occupancy status.

    5.1.2 Conclusions

    The Executive Summary shall include a conclusion that summarizes all

    recognized environmental conditions connected with the Subject and the

    impact of these recognized environmental conditions on the property.

    The report shall include one of the following statements:

    We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in con-

    formance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 and

    NCCI Securities International, Inc. for the (Subject). Any exception to,

    or deletions from, this practice are described in this report. This assess-

    ment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in

    connection with the Subject, or This assessment has revealed no evi-

    dence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Sub-

    ject except for the following (to be listed).

    5.1.3 Project Summary Schedule

    A table of the salient aspects of the investigation should be included in theExecutive Summary.

    5.1.4 Recommendations

    Recommendations for further investigation must be provided in the ESA

    if it is determined that further investigation may provide additional clarifi-

    cation of a Recognized Environmental Condition, or quantification. In ad-

    dition, recommendation for further investigation should be provided for

    any areas of environmental uncertainty that warranted further investiga-

    tion.

    Recommendations may include a file review, Phase II Environmental Site

    Assessments, obtain additional supporting documentation from the bor-

    rower or third parties, etc.

    In making recommendations for additional investigation, the consultant

    must recognize that their recommendation must be practical, and give a

    clear direction for NCCI.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    27/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    24

    When no recognized environmental conditions and no further action is

    warranted, a statement must be included in the report.

    5.1.5 Operations and Maintenance Plans

    Is some instances, typically encountered areas of environmental concern

    can be addressed with a routine solution, such as Asbestos and Lead. In

    those cases, it is appropriate to recommend the implementation of an op-

    erations and maintenance plan.

    5.1.6 Cost Estimates

    General cost ranges should be provided, which correspond to recommen-

    dations.

    5.2 Salient Building Facts

    Following the Executive Summary, the consult should provide a one page

    summary of the salient building facts, such as Name, Location, Size of

    Buildings, Rentable Square Footage, Units, Acreage, Parking, Construc-

    tion Type, Mechanical Systems, Borrower name, Site Contact, Date of

    Walk Through Survey, Person Conducting Site Visit, On-site Contact,

    etc.

    5.3 Purpose and Scope

    Provide a short paragraph specifically stating the purpose of the report.

    Subsequently, a general description of the methodologies utilized. This

    section should also identify the date of authorization, any supporting

    documentation provided by the borrower of their representative, i.e. plans,

    rent roll survey, etc., and person interviewed for the ESA.

    This section should also describe any material deviations from this scope

    of work.

    NCCI standard reliance language identified below must be included in this

    section of the report.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    28/29

    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS NOMURA CREDIT & CAPITAL, INC.

    SCOPE OF WORKVersion 3 (May 14, 2002)

    25

    Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (collec-

    tively, NCCI), its successors and assigns, rating agencies and certain

    investors involved in the Securitization (as defined below) or other dispo-

    sition, may use and rely upon this Report in connection with a planned se-

    curitization involving the loan secured by the Subject or a whole loan sale

    or other disposition of the related loan (collectively, the Securitization).NCCI, at its option, may elect to include selected information contained in

    the Report in the Offering Memorandum or other disclosure materials re-

    lating to the Securitization and the Consultant agrees to cooperate in an-

    swering questions by any of the above parties in connection with the Se-

    curitization.

    5.6 Exhibits

    5.6.1 Photographs

    Photographic documentation of the site shall include, but shall not be lim-

    ited to, the following:

    Typical views of the exterior and interior

    Typical views of the surrounding properties

    Typical views or representative environmental issues investigated by the

    consultant (USTs, ASTs, Transformers, Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, Dry

    Cleaner Equipment, Mechanical Rooms, etc.)

    All material concerns and/or areas of environmental uncertainty dis-

    cussed in the text of the report.

    5.6.2 Additional Supporting Documentation

    The following additional supporting documentation should be included in

    the report, if available:

    Database Reports

    Topographical Map

    Aerial Photographs

    Site Plans

    Laboratory Results

    References

    Rent role

    Leasing literature, listing for sale, marketing/promotion literature, floor

    plans, etc.

  • 8/14/2019 Final Phase I Scope - Nomura Standard.pdf

    29/29

    Environmental Permits or Registrations

    Previous Reports

    Any addition information deemed relevant to the report

    5.6.3 Questionnaire

    Copies of the completed (or incomplete) checklist should be included in

    this section.