FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010...

17
DRADRAFTDRAFT Not-spots research Impacts, causes and potential solutions for areas of poor coverage, not-spots Appendices (Part 2) FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 30 April 2010

Transcript of FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010...

Page 1: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

DRADRAFTDRAFT

Not-spots researchImpacts, causes and potential solutions for areas of poor coverage, not-spots

Appendices (Part 2) FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2)

30 April 2010

Page 2: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding
Page 3: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 1 30 April 2010

Contents

Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) 2

C.17 Train routes 2

Page 4: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010

Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding measurements and analyses for study sites in towns and villages are provided in a separate appendix (part 1).

C.17 Train routes Map scales are such that only gross effects are seen; call failure statistics are in the main report.

C.17.1 East coast mainline - 2G coverage

The figures shows 2G coverage is patchy along the east coast mainline, with most operators showing multiple areas of poor coverage (indicated in blue), even at this scale where only gross effects are seen. The measurements are taken inside the train so that areas of red indicate that it should be possible to sustain a call in those areas.

Page 5: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 3 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 1: Snapshot of 2G coverage between London and Edinburgh for operator A and B

Page 6: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 4 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 2: Snapshot of 2G coverage between London and Edinburgh for operator C and D

Page 7: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 5 30 April 2010

The measurements have been repeated several times on different trains. Figure 3 provides one example showing the repeatability. There is a good degree of consistency in the coverage bands (the different spacing of data points just reflects the speed of the train in different directions).

Figure 3: Illustration of a repeat measurement for one operator (southbound then northbound) around Huntingdon

C.17.2 East coast mainline - 3G coverage

Signal strength requirements for data transmission are more complex than for voice signal and, simplistically, depend on data rate and number of users. The measurement bands of CPICH power provide an indication of the ability to provide a basic service (red signal i.e. reliable voice coverage) to higher capacity signal (silver banding - 10 times higher rate than voice).

The following figures show there is relatively little 3G coverage along the east coast mainline - with just one operator providing a strong signal along virtually the whole route; coverage from a second is almost continuous, especially when the tolerance of data communications to short interruptions is considered. However one operator's coverage is good (i.e. mainly silver in the snapshots) suggesting good data rates can be expected.

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Page 8: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 6 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 4: Snapshot of 3G coverage between London and Edinburgh for operators F and G

Page 9: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 7 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 5: Snapshot of 3G coverage between London and Edinburgh for operators H and I

Page 10: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 8 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 6: Snapshot of 3G coverage between London and Edinburgh for operator J

Page 11: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 9 30 April 2010

C.17.3 West coast mainline - 2G coverage

The figures shows 2G coverage is generally excellent along the west coast mainline, with most operators showing extensive areas of high signal level (indicated in silver),. The measurements are taken inside the train so that areas of red indicate that it should be possible to sustain a call in those areas.

(Map scales are such that only gross effects are seen; call failure statistics are in the main report.)

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 7: Snapshot of 2G coverage between London and Glasgow for operators A and B

Page 12: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 10 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 8: Snapshot of 2G coverage between London and Glasgow for operators C and D

Page 13: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 11 30 April 2010

C.17.4 West coast mainline - 3G coverage

Signal strength requirements for data transmission are more complex than for voice signal and, simplistically, depend on data rate and number of users. The measurement bands of CPICH power provide an indication of the ability to provide a basic service (red signal i.e. reliable voice coverage) to higher capacity signal (silver banding - 10 times higher rate than voice).

The following figures show one operator provides good 3G coverage along most of the line (shown in silver) but that from the others is limited in many places (areas of blue or black). The measurements were taken inside the train so that the signal strength should be sufficient in areas shown in red for a call to be sustained.

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 9: Snapshot of 3G coverage between London and Glasgow for operators F and G

Page 14: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 12 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 10: Snapshot of 3G coverage between London and Glasgow for operators H and I

Page 15: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 13 30 April 2010

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed power

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Minimal observed powerMinimal observed power

Figure 11: Snapshot of 3G coverage between London and Glasgow for operator J

Page 16: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 14 30 April 2010

C.17.5 Edinburgh to Glasgow - 2G coverage

A small amount of trial data was collected between Edinburgh and Glasgow in a preliminary measurement. The figures suggest that there are many areas of poor 2G coverage along the route between Edinburgh and Glasgow, with most operators showing multiple patches of low signal level (indicated in blue). The measurements are taken inside the train so that areas of red indicate that it should be possible to sustain a call in those areas.

Operator C Operator D

Operator A Operator B

Operator C Operator D

Operator A Operator B

Figure 12: Snapshot of 2G coverage between Edinburgh and Glasgow for all operators

Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey: Good indoor coverage Poor outdoor coverageMid-range coverageKey:

Page 17: FIN-10-0064-D E Final Report Appendices Part 2...FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 2 30 April 2010 Appendix C: Site Criteria and summary of characteristics (Part 2) The corresponding

FIN-10-0064-D_E Appendices (Part 2) 15 30 April 2010

Los Angeles

Buenos Aires

Beijing

CopenhagenStockholm

Oslo

Dublin

LondonCambridgeBelfastBirminghamEdinburghManchester

UK:

Bangalore

Denver

New Delhi

Utrecht

FrankfurtMunich

Wellington

BostonNew YorkPrinceton

Madison

Washington, DC

Abu DhabiDoha

Los Angeles

Buenos Aires

Beijing

CopenhagenStockholm

Oslo

Dublin

LondonCambridgeBelfastBirminghamEdinburghManchester

UK:

Bangalore

Denver

New Delhi

Utrecht

FrankfurtMunich

Wellington

BostonNew YorkPrinceton

Madison

Washington, DC

Abu DhabiDoha

At PA Consulting Group, we transform the performance of organisations.

We put together teams from many disciplines and backgrounds to tackle the most complex problems facing our clients, working with leaders and their staff to turn around organisations in the private and public sectors. Clients call on us when they want:

an innovative solution: counter-intuitive thinking and groundbreaking solutions

a highly responsive approach: we listen, and then we act decisively and quickly

delivery of hard results: we get the job done, often trouble-shooting where previous initiatives have failed.

We are an independent, employee-owned firm of talented individuals, operating from offices across the world, in Europe, North America, Middle East, Latin America, Asia and Oceania. We have won numerous awards for delivering complex and highly innovative assignments, run one of the most successful venture programmes in our industry, have technology development capability that few firms can match, deep expertise across key industries and government, and a unique breadth of skills from strategy to IT to HR to applied technology.

• defence • energy • financial services • government and public services • international development • life sciences and healthcare • manufacturing • postal services • retail • telecommunications • transportation

• strategic management • innovation and technology • IT • operational improvement • human resources • complex programme delivery

Delivering business transformation

PA offices worldwide

Corporate headquarters 123 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 9SR United Kingdom Tel: +44 20 7730 9000 Fax: +44 20 7333 5050 E-mail: [email protected]

www.paconsulting.com

This document has been prepared by PA on the basis of information supplied by the client and that which is available in the public domain. No representation or warranty is given as to the achievement or reasonableness of future projections or the assumptions underlying them, management targets, valuation, opinions, prospects or returns, if any. Except where otherwise indicated, the document speaks as at the date hereof.

© PA Knowledge Limited 2010. All rights reserved.

This document is confidential to the organisation named herein and may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise without the written permission of PA Consulting Group. In the event that you receive this document in error, you should return it to PA Consulting Group, 123 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9SR. PA accepts no liability whatsoever should an unauthorised recipient of this document act on its contents.