Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

31
Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals

Transcript of Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Page 1: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Fiber Optic GyroscopesInstrumentation: Sensors and Signals

Page 2: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

History

•Developed in the 1980s as an alternative to Laser Ring Gyroscopes.▫More compact▫Less sensitive

Page 3: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Comparison and applications

Page 4: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

WHOI Puma

Page 5: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

How does a RLG work?

•Based on the Sagnac effect, like the FOG

Page 6: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Basic FOG configuration

Page 7: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Classical explanation

Δ k=kvc v=Ω×r d 𝜙=Δ k ⋅d s

•Basics

Variation in wave vector Wave vector Phase shift

Page 8: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Classical explanation

•Phase difference

d 𝜙=[Ω×r ⋅ d s ] k

cd 𝜙=( kc )Ω cosΨ rsin χds

Using Geometry

Page 9: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Classical explanation• Integrating phase difference along the path length

∫ rsin 𝜒 ds=2 AN Δ𝜙=( kc )Ω cosΨ 2 AN

Page 10: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

FOG Equation

Δ𝜙=( kc )Ω cosΨ 2 AN

𝜙 s=8𝜋 AN Ω p

𝜆c

𝜙 s=2 Δ𝜙 k=2𝜋 /𝜆 Ωp=ΩcosΨAngular wavenumber

Page 11: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Relativistic Explanation

•*

*Only correct if the detector is moving with the gyroscope

Page 12: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Open loop configuration with phase modulation

Page 13: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Analog signal implementation

Page 14: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Analog circuit implementation

• Issues:▫Fluctuations in offset voltages lower bias stability.▫Detectable angular velocity is limited to ▫Linearity and scale factor stability are easily

deteriorated by fluctuations in photodetector intensity.

II 0

=1+[J 0 (Φm )+2∑k − 1

J 2k (Φm ) cos 2k𝜔mt ]cos𝜙 s+[2∑k −1

J 2k −1 (Φm ) cos (2k −1)𝜔mt ]sin 𝜙s

Page 15: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Signal Processing Used

Page 16: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Digital circuit implementation

Digital signal processing apparatus. First to forth heterodyne mixers (2, 3, 4 and 5), an ADC (6), a timing pulse generating unit (7), a cosine/sine signal generating unit (8), first and second digital multipliers (9, 10), first and second digital filters (11, 12), a quadrant discriminating unit (13), an angular velocity computing unit (15), a phase modulation index computing unit (14) and a reference signal generating circuit (1).

Page 17: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Digital circuit implementation

Digital signal processing apparatus. First to forth heterodyne mixers (2, 3, 4 and 5), an ADC (6), a timing pulse generating unit (7), a cosine/sine signal generating unit (8), first and second digital multipliers (9, 10), first and second digital filters (11, 12), a quadrant discriminating unit (13), an angular velocity computing unit (15), a phase modulation index computing unit (14) and a reference signal generating circuit (1).

3

2

1

4

Isolate different harmonics

Page 18: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Digital circuit implementation

Digital signal processing apparatus. First to forth heterodyne mixers (2, 3, 4 and 5), an ADC (6), a timing pulse generating unit (7), a cosine/sine signal generating unit (8), first and second digital multipliers (9, 10), first and second digital filters (11, 12), a quadrant discriminating unit (13), an angular velocity computing unit (15), a phase modulation index computing unit (14) and a reference signal generating circuit (1).

4

5

Digital Filter Low pass => DC component kept

Page 19: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Digital circuit implementation

Digital signal processing apparatus. First to forth heterodyne mixers (2, 3, 4 and 5), an ADC (6), a timing pulse generating unit (7), a cosine/sine signal generating unit (8), first and second digital multipliers (9, 10), first and second digital filters (11, 12), a quadrant discriminating unit (13), an angular velocity computing unit (15), a phase modulation index computing unit (14) and a reference signal generating circuit (1).

Page 20: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Digital circuit implementation

Digital signal processing apparatus. First to forth heterodyne mixers (2, 3, 4 and 5), an ADC (6), a timing pulse generating unit (7), a cosine/sine signal generating unit (8), first and second digital multipliers (9, 10), first and second digital filters (11, 12), a quadrant discriminating unit (13), an angular velocity computing unit (15), a phase modulation index computing unit (14) and a reference signal generating circuit (1).

Page 21: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Digital circuit implementation

Digital signal processing apparatus. First to forth heterodyne mixers (2, 3, 4 and 5), an ADC (6), a timing pulse generating unit (7), a cosine/sine signal generating unit (8), first and second digital multipliers (9, 10), first and second digital filters (11, 12), a quadrant discriminating unit (13), an angular velocity computing unit (15), a phase modulation index computing unit (14) and a reference signal generating circuit (1).

Page 22: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Quantum Theoretical Performance Limit

,

, ,

Theoretically

Page 23: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Sources of nonidealities

•Nonreciprocity – differences in the optical paths of the counter propagating waves

•Polarization•Backscattering•Magneto-optical Faraday

effect

Page 24: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Case Study: RA2100 (KVH Industries)

Page 25: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Case Study: RA2100 (KVH Industries)

Source: ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/Hardware/KVH/ec2k-b.pdf

Page 26: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.
Page 27: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Case Study: RA2100 (KVH Industries)

Page 28: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Case Study: RA2100 (KVH Industries)

Page 29: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Case Study: RA2100 (KVH Industries)

Page 30: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Case Study: RA2100 (KVH Industries)

Page 31: Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Instrumentation: Sensors and Signals.

Questions?