FERRUM SUBSTATION TO GARONA SUBSTATION 400kV OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE

FERRUM SUBSTATION TO GARONA SUBSTATION 400kVOVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE

DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

JUNE 2013

NEAS Reference: DEA/EIA/0001481/2012DEA Reference: 14/12/16/3/3/2/422

COMPILED BY:

Envirolution Consulting (Pty) Ltd

PO Box 1898

Sunninghill

2157

Tel: (0861) 44 44 99

Fax: (0861) 62 62 22

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: www.envirolution.co.za

PREPARED FOR:

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd.

Eskom Transmission

P.O.Box 1091

Johannesburg

20001

Tel: (011) 800 2706

Fax: 086 662 2236

COPYRIGHT WARNING

With very few exceptions the copyright of all text and presented information is the exclusive property of Envirolution

Consulting (Pty) Ltd. It is a criminal offence to reproduce and/or use, without written consent, any information, technical

procedure and/or technique contained in this document. Criminal and civil proceedings will be taken as a matter of

strict routine against any person and/or institution infringing the copyright of Envirolution Consulting (Pty) Ltd.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

2

Date 24 April 2012

ProjectFerrum Substation To Garona Substation 400kvOverhead Transmission Line

Document Title Draft Basic Assessment Report

Author Dirk Prinsloo

Document Revision Draft

Reviewed by

Approved


3

CONTENTS

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION............................................................................................. 81. PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................... 8

PROJECT BACKGROUND........................................................................................................ 8LOCATION.............................................................................................................................. 11SPECIALIST STUDIES............................................................................................................ 11ROUTE SELECTION............................................................................................................... 12SERVITUDE............................................................................................................................ 13CONSTRUCTION PHASE ....................................................................................................... 14OPERATIONAL PHASE .......................................................................................................... 15

2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES .................................................................... 163. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY ........................................................................................ 204. SITE ACCESS......................................................................................................................... 205. LOCALITY MAP ...................................................................................................................... 216. LAYOUT/ROUTE PLAN........................................................................................................... 227. SENSITIVITY MAP .................................................................................................................. 228. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ............................................................................................................ 229. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION....................................................................................................... 2310. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION.......................................................................................................... 2311. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES ............................................. 2712. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT................................................ 2813. WATER USE........................................................................................................................... 3114. ENERGY EFFICIENCY............................................................................................................ 31SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ..................................................................... 331. GRADIENT OF THE SITE........................................................................................................ 342. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE.................................................................................................... 353. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE .................................. 354. GROUNDCOVER.................................................................................................................... 375. SURFACE WATER.................................................................................................................. 396. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA ............................................................. 407. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES..................................................................................... 428. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTER .......................................................................................... 43

INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................................... 44BASIC SERVICES....................................................................................................................... 44TOURISM SECTORS .................................................................................................................. 44PROFILE OF THE REGIONAL ECONOMY.................................................................................. 44

9. BIODIVERSITY ....................................................................................................................... 46VEGETATION TYPES............................................................................................................. 49AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM.......................................................................................................... 49AVIFAUNA .............................................................................................................................. 50FAUNA.................................................................................................................................... 50

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION............................................................................................ 521. ADVERTISEMENT AND NOTICE ............................................................................................ 522. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES................................................................ 523. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES .............................................. 534. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT................................................................................ 53


4

5. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................ 536. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................. 54SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................. 551. Impacts that may result from the planning and design, construction, operational, decommissioningand closure phases as well as proposed management of identified impacts and proposed mitigationmeasures......................................................................................................................................... 552. Environmental impact statement .............................................................................................. 60SECTION E: RECOMMENDATIONS OF PRACTITIONER................................................................ 63SECTION F: APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 64

Appendix A: Maps........................................................................................................................ 65Appendix B: Photographs............................................................................................................. 66Appendix C: Facility illustration(s) ................................................................................................. 67Appendix D: Specialist reports (including terms of reference) ........................................................ 68Appendix D 1: Avifauna................................................................................................................ 69Appendix D 2: Fauna & Flora ....................................................................................................... 70Appendix D 3: Geotechnical ......................................................................................................... 71Appendix D 4: Heritage ................................................................................................................ 72Appendix D 5: Social.................................................................................................................... 73Appendix D 5: Visual.................................................................................................................... 74Appendix E: Public Participation ................................................................................................... 75Appendix F: Impact Assessment .................................................................................................. 76Appendix G: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) ...................................................... 77Appendix H: Details of EAP and expertise .................................................................................... 78Appendix I: Specialist’s declaration of interest............................................................................... 79Appendix J: Additional Information................................................................................................ 80

ABREVIATIONS

BAR Basic Assessment ReportCEMPr Construction Environmental Management ProgrammeDEA Department of Environmental Affairs (previously Department of Environmental Affairs

and Tourism)DoE Department of EnergyEAP Environmental Assessment PractitionerEMPr Environmental Management ProgrammeEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentERA Electricity Regulation Act (No. 4 of 2006)GN Government Noticeha HectaresHIA Heritage Impact AssessmentI&AP’s Interested and Affected PartiesIPP Independent Power ProducerMW MegawattsNEMA National Environmental Management Act (No. 107 of 1998) (as amended)NHRA National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999)NWA National Water Act (No 36 of 1998)OEMP Operational phase Environmental Management ProgrammeSAHRA South African Heritage Resources Agency


5

SACNASP South African Council for Natural Scientific ProfessionsSDF Spatial Development Framework


6

(For official use only)File Reference Number:Application Number:Date Received:

Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010,promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), asamended.

Kindly note that:

1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authorityin terms of the EIA Regulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make surethat it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being appliedfor.

2. This report format is current as of 1 September 2012. It is the responsibility of the applicant toascertain whether subsequent versions of the form have been published or produced by thecompetent authority

3. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces providedis not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form ofa table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing.

4. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report.

5. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.

6. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used inrespect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing theapplication, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.

7. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by eachauthority.

8. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.

9. The signature of the EAP on the report must be an original signature.

10. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner.

11. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt bythe competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the informationcontained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process.

12. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations onlyparts of this report need to be completed.

13. Should a specialist report or report on a specialised process be submitted at any stage for any partof this application, the terms of reference for such report must also be submitted.


7

14. Two (2) colour hard copies and one (1) electronic copy of the report must be submitted to thecompetent authority.

15. Shape files (.shp) for maps must be included on the electronic copy of the report submitted to thecompetent authority.


8

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION

Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO√If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for thespecialist appointed and attach in Appendix I.

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

a) Describe the project associated with the listed activities applied for

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd is proposing to construct a 400kV transmission power line, approximately155km in length, between Ferrum (Kathu) and Garona (Groblershoop) Substations within the NorthernCape Province. The project aims to strengthen the Transmission network capacity as well as toimprove the quality of electricity supply in the region and the national electricity grid as a whole.

In terms of the NEMA EIA Regulations, 2010: GN544 promulgated under Chapter 5 of the NationalEnvironmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998) (“NEMA”), and published in Government Gazette33306 on 18 June 2010; a Basic Assessment Report (BAR) is required for this project.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd has appointed Envirolution Consulting as independent environmentalconsultants, to undertake the Basic Assessment and EMPr process. The main objective of the BasicAssessment and EMPr is to identify and assess potential environmental impacts associated with theproposed project, and to compile appropriate mitigation measures. An application was submitted toDEA and acknowledgement of receipt was received on 10 October 2012. The following referencenumbers were allocated;

• NEAS Reference: DEA/EIA/0001481/2012• DEA Reference : 14/12/16/3/3/2/422

It is to be noted that a Scoping and EIA and EMP was previously conducted by Bohlweki Environmental(Pty) Ltd and the Record of Decision ((RoD), Ref No 12/12/20/752) was granted on the 16th November2007. Eskom was unable to commence with the construction process due to delays in finalizing theland owner’s negotiation agreements. The delays resulted in the lapsing of the RoD and in terms ofNEMA and a new Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process must be carried out. The routealternative that received Environmental Authorisation in 2007 is the preferred alternative for the 2013Basic Assessment. The preferred route is adjacent to the existing 275kV Ferrum to Garona line, exceptat the Sishen Mine.

In addition, Eskom has applied for exemption from certain provisions of Regulations in terms ofRegulation 50 as published in Government Notice No. R. 543 (Government Gazette No. 33306 of 18June 2010). The DEA granted permission in terms of Regulation 20(4), to apply for a BasicAssessment Reporting Process, instead of a Scoping and Environmental Impact Reporting process.

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Electricity cannot be stored and therefore South Africa requires thousands of kilometres of high voltagetransmission power lines from generation facilities to major substations, where the voltage is downrated for distribution to industry, businesses, homes and farms all over the country. The main source of


9

electricity to the Cape Region Network is the generation pool of power stations located in Mpumalanga.Koeberg Nuclear power station, Palmiet pumped storage scheme and Ankerlig peaking power plantprovide limited amounts of the power to the Cape Region Network. The transmission network betweenAlpha Main Transmission System (MTS) substation near Standerton in Mpumalanga and Koebergforms the backbone of the Cape Network (See Figure 1). Although it allows for the distribution ofelectricity in both directions, it has developed as a result of the fact that most of the country's power isgenerated in Mpumalanga. Koeberg can supply up to 1840MW of power locally, but might not alwaysbe available. Similarly some of the 765kV or 400kV lines may have faults on it, be out for maintenancepurposes or switched out because of veld fires. This impacts on the reliability of the electricity to allcustomers, due to limitations in line capacities. This is why the Transmission network in the CapeRegion is planned holistically to provide adequate and reliable electricity to all customers.

Figure 1. Cape Load Network

The Cape Transmission System also serves to export power to Namibia for a large portion of the year.The first 400 kV inter-connector between South Africa and Namibia was commissioned in 1999.Indications are that Namibia will continue to rely on energy import from South Africa to meet the bulk oftheir energy requirements in the short to medium term. The loading on the Cape Transmission Systemis therefore likely to increase as a result of increased energy demand by NamPower.

The Eskom Transmission Development Plan (TDP 2013 – 2022) highlights that there are currently notransmission lines that connect the Kimberley CLN to the Namaqua and West Coast CLN. See Figure2.


10

Figure 2. Transmission Development Plan

The following projects are planned to link the transmission lines that connect the Kimberley CLN

to the Namaqua and West Coast CLN.

WEST COAST Customer Load Networks (CLN)The West Coast, Namaqualand, and parts of the Peninsula CLN are supplied via the Hydra-Aries-Aurora power corridor. It is proposed to create a new Ferrum-Aries 400kV power corridor once both theMercury-Ferrum and Epsilon-Ferrum 400kV corridors have been established

The strengthening projects within the West Coast CLN are as follows:

Construct the Ferrum-Nieuwehoop 400kV line 2016/2017

NAMAQUALAND CLNThe Namaqualand CLN is supplied via the Aggeneis Main Transmission Substation (MTS). All thestations in this CLN have single in-feeds. A number of projects are included to bring it into compliancewith the minimum security standard of N-1 redundancy. The projects within the Namaqualand CLN areas follows:

Northern Cape Reinforcement Ferrum–Garona–Nieuwehoop 400kV

Construct Ferrum–Garona first 400kV line 2017Construct Garona–Nieuwehoop first 400kV line


11

LOCATION

The proposed transmission line is located between the towns of Kathu and Groblershoop, NorthernCape. The Ferrum Substation is situated approximately 10 km southeast of Kathu and 5 km northeastof the Sishen Mine and west of the N14. The Garona Substation is situated 20 km northeast ofGroblershoop adjacent the Orange River. Land is mainly used for farming except the areas where theSishen Iron Mine is located. The area is scarcely populated with the majority of the populationconcentrated in the urban nodes of Kathu, Olifantshoek and Groblershoop. See Figure 3. Location.

Figure 3. Location

SPECIALIST STUDIES

The specialists presented below (Table 1: Specialist Studies), have undertaken relevant specialiststudies to provide more detailed information on the environment that may be affected by the proposedproject.

Table 1: Specialist Studies

Name Organisation InputAndrew Pearson Endangered Wildlife

TrustAvifauna

Martin vd Walt Martin vd Walt Geology and GeotechCobus Dreyer Cobus Dreyer Heritage Heritage Impact AssessmentIngrid Snyman Batho Earth Social Impact AssessmentLourens du Plessis MetroGIS Visual Impact AssessmentProf Johann du Preez ECO Care Consultancy Vegetation Study and Fauna


12

ROUTE SELECTION

A route selection process was undertaken by Eskom in 2006 and two feasible route alternatives wereidentified. The route selection criteria to identify potential route alternatives usually includes assessingthe following:

Cadastral Boundaries;Physical environment, including terrain, accessibility for construction and maintenance, natural

features;Land use, including identification of high potential agricultural land, existing buildings and

structures;Visible heritage resources such as graves; andExisting services such as electricity transmission and distribution lines and bulk services

infrastructure.

400KV TRANSMISSION LINE INFRASTRUCTURE

It is important to note that the proposed Ferrum to Garona 400kV may not require turn-in lines into theGarona substation. It is possible that the lines will bypass the substation and run directly to theNieuwehoop substation. The line from Garona to Nieuwehoop and the Nieuwehoop turn-in lines havereceived Environmental Authorisation.

The proposed 400 kV Transmission power line is to be constructed between the existing Ferrum andGarona Substations, a distance of approximately 155 km, depending on the preferred final alignment.

Towers that may be used for the 400 kV Transmission power line include: compact cross-rope suspension towers( Figure 4) , and strain towers or self-supporting towers ( Figure 5).

+ ++

+++

+ + + + +

++

++ +

+ +

+

++

++

+

++

+

++

+

+ + +

++ +

+ ++

++

+

++

+

++

+

+ +

++

++

SERVITUDE AND CONDUCTOR CLEARANCE

suspension typeCross-Rope

+

+

400kV TRANSMISSION LINE

8.5m

Min.

Conductor

clearance

Servitude

21.0m55.0m

28.0

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

36.0m(average)

+ ++

Figure 4. Cross-rope Suspension Tower


13

+

Minimum

Conductor

clearance

SERVITUDE AND CONDUCTOR CLEARANCE400kV TRANSMISSION LINE

47.0m

7.8m++ +

++ + +

++ +

+

+ + +

+ + +

+ + +

+ + +

++

+ +++

+ + + + +

++ + +

+ + + +

+ + ++

+

Servitude

30.0m(average)

20.0m

+

8.8m

++

+

Self-Supporting type

Figure 5. Self Supporting Tower

The final design and technical detail will be completed once the preferred route Alternative has beendecided upon through the environmental investigations (including both biophysical and social). It isexpected that the towers forming part of the Ferrum-Garona Transmission line are to be 30 m to 40 min height and will extend over a total footprint area of 80 m x 50 m, which is required for each tower.The average span between two towers is 300-400 m. The land beneath the overhead lines cancontinue to be used, as normal, by the landowners. Eskom, however, will stipulate that no dwellings orvegetation/crops higher than 3 m be established within the servitude. No temporary or permanentstructures may be constructed on the registered Eskom servitude. Some sections of the proposedtransmission line could be double circuit transmission lines and assessment criteria, such as heighthave been taken into consideration.

SERVITUDE

A single 55 m wide servitude will required to accommodate the towers upon which the proposed 400 kVtransmission line is to be strung. It is important to note that depending on terrain and infrastructurerequired for towers, some of the anchor cables may be outside the 55m servitude and separate 10mservitudes will be required. The proposed 400 kV Transmission power line is to be constructedbetween the existing Ferrum and Garona Substations, a distance of approximately 155 km, dependingon the preferred final alignment. An 8 m-wide strip is generally cleared of all trees and shrubs down thecentreline of a Transmission line servitude for stringing purposes only. Any vegetation in other areasthat could interfere with the operation and/or reliability of the Transmission line must be trimmed orcompletely cleared. See the Eskom Transmission Vegetation Management Guideline (2009) inAppendix J. Vegetation clearance for the proposed Ferrum-Garona 400 kV Transmission power linewill be minimal due to the characteristic low-growing plant species predominant in the study area.

The Eskom Standard and specifications for bush clearance and invasive alien plant management fornew power line construction specifications have been incorporated into the Environmental Management


14

Programme (EMPr), which will guide the construction, operational and maintenance phases of theproject. See Appendix G .

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

The Eskom specification for The Transmission Line Towers and Line Construction (March 2001) guidesthe construction process (See Appendix J). . The following steps are followed during the constructionof Transmission lines:

Vegetation clearance and gate erection;Establishment of construction camp, pegging of structures;Construction of access roads (where required);Construction of foundationsAssembly and erection of structuresStringing of conductorsRehabilitation of disturbed area and protection of erosion sensitive areas

Services Required During Construction Phase

Access RoadsFor construction purposes most areas along the two routes are accessible via the existing gates andservice roads to the existing 275kV Ferrum to Garona line. In addition, the Transnet service road forthe Sishen to Saldanha Railway line provide good access.

Storm water will be managed according to the Eskom Guidelines for Erosion Control and VegetationManagement as well as the Environmental Management Programme (EMPr), which will be compiled forthe construction phase.

Construction Site CampsThe power line construction contractor would need to set up at least one site camp but this does notnecessarily need to be near the power line route. The contractor may however prefer to use a fullyserviced site at another location. The contractor will be encouraged to utilised already disturbed areasfor construction camp purposes, in order to minimise cumulative impacts. It is likely that a number ofconstruction camps would need to be established for the construction period.

SewageA negligible sewage flow is anticipated for the duration of the construction period. Chemical toilets willbe utilised during construction, and the contactor will ensure regular treatment of these facilities. Thetoilets will be serviced regularly , as specified by the final site specific EMPr.

Solid Waste DisposalAll solid waste will be collected at a central location at each construction site and will be storedtemporarily until removal to an appropriately permitted landfill site in the vicinity of the construction site.

Concrete BatchingConcrete batching will be required for the foundations of the transmission line towers. The followingguidelines are contained in the Eskom specification For The Transmission Line Towers and LineConstruction:

a) The Contractor shall be responsible for negotiating the site of his batching plant (if required) and the


15

conditions under it may be established, with the landowner. The Contractor shall be responsible for theproper management of the batching plant.b) Upon completion of works, the ground of the batching plant area shall be rehabilitated and the sitecleaned and left as it was found and to the satisfaction of the Supervisor and landowner.c) The use of local water for concrete must first be negotiated with the landowner and the appropriateauthorities. Such water is to be analysed and accepted by the Project Managerbefore use

FoundationsThe excavations shall be kept covered or barricaded in a manner accepted by the Supervisor toprevent injury to people or livestock. Failure to maintain proper protection of excavations may result inthe suspension of excavation work until proper protection has been restored.

StringingOnce towers have been erected, cables will be strung between the towers.

Bird Flight DivertersIf required Bird flight deflectors will be fitted during the construction phase.

OPERATIONAL PHASE

Vegetation will be maintained by Eskom in the operational phase of the project.

b) Provide a detailed description of the listed activities associated with the project asapplied for

Listed activity as described in GN R.544, 545and 546

Description of project activity

GN No. R544 2010 (Listing Notice 1) - Activity22 (ii)

The proposed development would involve widening ofroads or multiple roads wider than 8 metre for accessto ensure the ease of construction and maintenance ofthe proposed power line.

GN No. R544 2010 (Listing Notice 1) – Activity38

There will be an expansion of the existing Garona andFerrum substations used for the distribution ofelectricity to accommodate the increased capacity of(400 kilovolts).


The proposed development would involve widening ofexisting access roads to ensure the ease ofconstruction and maintenance of the proposed powerline.


The proposed development would also involve theinstallation of a telecommunication mast that would beused for communication purposes at the affectedsubstations

GN No. R546 2010 (Listing Notice 3) Activity4(ii):- (aa), (bb), (cc) & (gg): of Listing notice 3 of2010

The proposed development would involve constructionof roads to ensure the ease of construction andmaintenance of the proposed power line.

GN No. R546 2010 (Listing Notice 3) Activity 9(a):of Listing notice 3 of 2010

The proposed construction of a 400kV power linewould inherently involve the use of above groundcabelways for electricity transmission between Ferrumand Garona substations.


16

GN No. R546 2010 (Listing Notice 3) Activity 13(i)-: (aa), (bb), (cc) & (ff), (ii)-(bb) & (dd) of

During construction of a 400kV power line there will beclearing of vegetation along the line and also withinthe 2km corridors of 1 hectare or more.

2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES

“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the generalpurpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to—

(a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity;(b) the type of activity to be undertaken;(c) the design or layout of the activity;(d) the technology to be used in the activity;(e) the operational aspects of the activity; and(f) the option of not implementing the activity.

Describe alternatives that are considered in this application as required by Regulation 22(2)(h) ofGN R.543. Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose andneed of the proposed activity (NOT PROJECT) could be accomplished in the specific instance takingaccount of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases beincluded in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternativesare assessed.

The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes, etc.) or both is appropriateneeds to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt ofthis report the, competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives thatcould possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realisticalternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.

The identification of alternatives should be in line with the Integrated Environmental AssessmentGuideline Series 11, published by the DEA in 2004. Should the alternatives include different locationsand lay-outs, the co-ordinates of the different alternatives must be provided. The co-ordinates shouldbe in degrees, minutes and seconds. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84spheroid in a national or local projection.

a) Site alternatives

Route Alternative 1 begins at Ferrum Substation, which is situated approximately 10km to thesoutheast of Kathu and 5km to the northeast of Sishen Mine. The route follows that of the existing 275/ 200kV transmission line. It then deviates (See from the existing line in a westerly direction along thererouted Kalahari Manganese Fields railway line. It passes 5km to the east of Olifantshoek. It followsthe existing 275/22kV line and is in close proximity to the Sishen Saldanha Railway line for most of thealignment.

Alternative 2 initially follows the same route as Alternative 1 but veers off to the north of Alternative 1shortly before crossing the border between Kgalagadi and Siyanda District Municipalities. It is routed


17

along the N14 highway for some 20km before entering the NCDMA08 District Management Area.ending at Garona Substation in the vicinity of Groblershoop.

Figure 6. Sishen Mine Deviation

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)Substation Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

Alternative 2Substation Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

Alternative 3Substation Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

In the case of linear activities:

Distribution Line Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):400kV Alternative S1 (preferred)

Starting point of the activity 27° 43.931’ 23° 3.404’

Middle/Additional point of the activity 28° 12.869’ 22° 35.692’

End point of the activity 28° 44.487’ 21° 59.823’400kV Alternative S2

Starting point of the activity 27° 43.931’ 23° 3.404’


18

Middle/Additional point of the activity 28° 12.869’ 22° 35.692’

End point of the activity 28° 44.487’ 21° 59.823’

Alternative S3

Starting point of the activity Middle/Additional point of the activity

End point of the activity

For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates takenevery 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment.

In the case of an area being under application, please provide the co-ordinates of the corners of the siteas indicated on the lay-out map provided in Appendix A.

b) Lay-out alternatives

The project specialists assessed a route corridor 4 kilometres wide for the route alternatives. Two (2)feasible alternative route corridors for the construction of the proposed 400 kV Transmission line wereidentified for investigation within the EIA studies from Ferrum Substation to Garona Substation. Theenvironmental feasibility of these two alignment alternatives are assessed in this Basic AssessmentReport.

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

Alternative 2Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

Alternative 3Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)


19

c) Technology alternatives

Various technology alternatives are considered. The technology alternatives will only be finalisedonce a site specific geotechnical study is completed for precise placement of towers. The geologicalconditions will dictate technology alternative. Based on similar projects, it is anticipated that thefollowing types of towers may be used on this project:

Cross rope suspension tower; Compact cross rope suspension tower; Guyed-V suspension tower; Self-supporting suspension tower; Self-supporting strain tower; or Guyed strain structures.

Double circuit towers could be utilised on certain sections of proposed lines.Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)

Alternative 2

Alternative 3

d) Other alternatives (e.g. scheduling, demand, input, scale and design alternatives)

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)

Alternative 2

Alternative 3

e) No-go alternative

The No-go option implies that the Project does not proceed, and Eskom does not go ahead with theconstruction of the 400 kV power line. The implications of No-go alternative include:

The is no change to current landscape; Electricity supply to the area will be negatively affected; and Terms of National initiatives such as the SDP will not be met.

Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.


20

3. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY

a) Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternativeactivities/technologies (footprints):

Alternative: Size of the activity:Alternative A11 (preferred activity alternative) m2

Alternative A2 (if any) m2

Alternative A3 (if any) m2

or, for linear activities:Alternative: Length of the activity:Alternative A1 (Alternative 1, Preferred) 160 kmAlternative A2 162 kmAlternative A3

b) Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprintswill occur):

Alternative: Size of the site/servitude:Alternative A1 (Alternative 1, Preferred) Distance x 55 m servitude 8 800 000 m2

Alternative A2 Distance x 55 m servitude 8 900 000 m2

Alternative A3 Distance x m servitude m2

4. SITE ACCESS

Does ready access to the site exist? YES √ NO√If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built m

1 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.


21

Describe the type of access road planned:

The preferred alternative, (alternative 1) is in close proximity to the existing Transnet Sishen Saldanharailway line and the Hotazel railway line, which has a dedicated service road. The Transnet serviceroad will provide access to the general area and farm roads will provide further access. The proposedroute from the northern substation of the proposed lines would utilise the existing access roads as theywould run in parallel with the existing transmission lines. Existing service roads for the existing 275kVline will be utilized, as it is adjacent to the proposed 400kV line.

Approximately 18km of maintenance tracks (See Figure 7. Access Roads) would be required for thenew deviation at Sishen mine. The maintenance tracks will be approximately 4m in width but notexceeding 8m and would need to be constructed to allow access along sections of the servitude notaccessible from existing roads .

Figure 7. Access Roads

Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of theroad in relation to the site.

5. LOCALITY MAP

An A3 locality map must be attached to the back of this document, as Appendix A. The scale of thelocality map must be relevant to the size of the development (at least 1:50 000. For linear activities ofmore than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g. 1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated onthe map.). The map must indicate the following:

an accurate indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the alternative sites, ifany;

indication of all the alternatives identified;


22

closest town(s;) road access from all major roads in the area; road names or numbers of all major roads as well as the roads that provide access to the site(s); all roads within a 1km radius of the site or alternative sites; and a north arrow; a legend; and locality GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the

centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimalminutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. Theprojection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection).

6. LAYOUT/ROUTE PLAN

A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It mustbe attached as Appendix A to this document.

The site or route plans must indicate the following:

the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site; the current land use as well as the land use zoning of the site; the current land use as well as the land use zoning each of the properties adjoining the site or sites; the exact position of each listed activity applied for (including alternatives); servitude(s) indicating the purpose of the servitude; a legend; and a north arrow.

7. SENSITIVITY MAP

The layout/route plan as indicated above must be overlain with a sensitivity map that indicates all thesensitive areas associated with the site, including, but not limited to:

watercourses; the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA); ridges; cultural and historical features; areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or infested with alien species); and critical biodiversity areas.

The sensitivity map must also cover areas within 100m of the site and must be attached in Appendix A.

8. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compassdirections with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B tothis report. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, ifapplicable.


23

9. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION

A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of at least 1:200 as Appendix C foractivities that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic imageof the planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity.

10. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION

Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):

1. Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existingland use rights?

YES√ NO Please explain

The area is currently used for agriculture. Once constructed the area servitude will still be used foragriculture.

2. Will the activity be in line with the following?

(a) Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES √ NO Please explain

The infrastructure network of the Province is a strategic, socio-economic and bulk infrastructureinvestment and includes: transport and logistics (including roads, rail and air), Information andCommunication and e Technologies, schools, hospitals, clinics, libraries, universities (if applicable),electricity services (energy), water reticulation services, sewage and sanitation services, wastemanagement services, and so forth. Thus the provision of provision of electrical infrastructure is inline with SDF.

(b) Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES NO√ Please explain

The proposed transmission lines fall outside the built up area of Kathu and Sishen. However,electricity distribution infrastructure is required for areas outside the urban edge. The project willstrengthen the electricity distribution network in the area, which is both inside and outside the urbanedge.

(c) Integrated Development Plan (IDP) and SpatialDevelopment Framework (SDF) of the Local Municipality(e.g. would the approval of this application compromisethe integrity of the existing approved and crediblemunicipal IDP and SDF?).

YES NO√ Please explain

The Gamagara Local Municipality SDF will not be compromised by the development. The servitudefor the existing 275kV transmission line has been zoned as open space. The servitude of theproposed Ferrum Garona 400kV line will contribute to additional Open Space for the Municipality.

(d) Approved Structure Plan of the Municipality YES√ NO Please explain

The proposed project entails electricity infrastructure, which is compatible with Provincial and LocalMunicipality objectives.


24

(e) An Environmental Management Framework (EMF)adopted by the Department (e.g. Would the approval ofthis application compromise the integrity of the existingenvironmental management priorities for the area and ifso, can it be justified in terms of sustainabilityconsiderations?)


No EMF for study area. The project will not compromise the integrity of the environment

(f) Any other Plans (e.g. Guide Plan) YES NO√ Please explain

No other plans applicable.

3. Is the land use (associated with the activity being applied for)considered within the timeframe intended by the existingapproved SDF agreed to by the relevant environmentalauthority (i.e. is the proposed development in line with theprojects and programmes identified as priorities within thecredible IDP)?


The proposed development is in line with the National Development Plan, which related to theprovision of infrastructure such as electricity supply.

4. Does the community/area need the activity and the associatedland use concerned (is it a societal priority)? (This refers tothe strategic as well as local level (e.g. development is anational priority, but within a specific local context it could beinappropriate.)


The area requires additional electricity capacity for economic growth and creation of jobs.

5. Are the necessary services with adequate capacity currentlyavailable (at the time of application), or must additionalcapacity be created to cater for the development?(Confirmation by the relevant Municipality in this regard mustbe attached to the final Basic Assessment Report asAppendix I.)


The proposed project is the construction of a 400Kv transmission line. It will not require any capacity

for services such as water and sanitation from relevant Municipalities. It will however provide

additional electricity capacity to the Northern Cape.

6. Is this development provided for in the infrastructureplanning of the municipality, and if not what will theimplication be on the infrastructure planning of themunicipality (priority and placement of services andopportunity costs)? (Comment by the relevant Municipality inthis regard must be attached to the final Basic AssessmentReport as Appendix I.)


The proposed project is the construction of a 400Kv transmission line. It will not require any capacity

for services such as water and sanitation from relevant Municipalities. It will however provide

additional electricity capacity to the Northern Cape.


25

7. Is this project part of a national programme to address anissue of national concern or importance?

YES √ NO Please explain

The proposed development is in line with the National Development Plan, which related to theprovision of infrastructure such as electricity supply.

8. Do location factors favour this land use (associated with theactivity applied for) at this place? (This relates to thecontextualisation of the proposed land use on this site withinits broader context.)


The preferred alternative is adjacent to the existing 275kV power line between Ferrum and Garona

substations. It is also in close proximity to the Sishen Saldanha railway line and service road. The

servitude underneath the proposed power line will still be used for commercial stock farming

activities.

9. Is the development the best practicable environmental optionfor this land/site?


The proposed transmission lines will be located in an area used primarily for livestock production.

Once the construction phase of the proposed transmission line is completed, the servitude area will

continue to be used for grazing of livestock

10. Will the benefits of the proposed land use/developmentoutweigh the negative impacts of it?


The proposed 400kV transmission line will be beneficial to the local economy.

11. Will the proposed land use/development set a precedent forsimilar activities in the area (local municipality)?


The preferred alternative is adjacent to the existing 275kV power line between Ferrum and Garona

substations. It is also in close proximity to the Sishen Saldanha railway line and service road. The

servitude underneath the proposed power line will still be used for commercial stock farming

activities.

12. Will any person’s rights be negatively affected by theproposed activity/ies?


The proposed transmission line will not negatively affect any persons rights. Servitude agreements

have been signed with most land owners post Environmental Authorisation in 2007.

13. Will the proposed activity/ies compromise the “urban edge”as defined by the local municipality?


The project is the proposed construction of an electricity transmission line. Areas outside of the

urban edge and rural areas do require electricity.


26

14. Will the proposed activity/ies contribute to any of the 17Strategic Integrated Projects (SIPS)?


The project will conform to the objectives of the following SIPS:

SIP 6: Integrated Municipal Infrastructure Project

Develop a national capacity to assist the 23 least resourced districts (17 million people) to address all

the maintenance backlogs and upgrades required in water, electricity and sanitation bulk

infrastructure.

SIP 10: Electricity Transmission and Distribution for all

Expand the transmission and distribution network to address historical imbalances, provide access to

electricity for all and support economic development. Align the 10-year transmission plan, the

services backlog, the national broadband roll-out and the freight rail line development to leverage off

regulatory approvals, supply chain and project development capacity.

15. What will the benefits be to society in general and to the localcommunities?

Please explain

The provision of a reliable electricity network and provision of capacity for new users.

16. Any other need and desirability considerations related to the proposedactivity?

Please explain

The proposed project will ensure that economic growth continues in the Northern Cape Region.


27

17. How does the project fit into the National Development Plan for 2030? Please explain

The following NDP sections area relevant:

ELEMENTS OF A DECENT STANDARD OF LIVING

Electricity

WOMEN AND THE PLAN

Access to safe drinking water, electricity and quality early childhood education, for example, couldfree women from doing unpaid work and help them seek jobs

Due to a reduction in capital spending from effect, South Africa has missed a generation of capitalinvestment in roads, rail, ports, electricity, water, sanitation, public transport and housing. To growfaster and in a more inclusive manner, the country needs a higher level of capital spending.

Chapter 4:

ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE

Objectives

The proportion of people with access to the electricity grid should rise to at least 90 percent by2030, with non-grid options available for the rest.

Actions

21. Revise national electrification plan and ensure 90 percent grid access by 2030 (with balancemet through off-grid technologies).

18. Please describe how the general objectives of Integrated Environmental Management asset out in section 23 of NEMA have been taken into account.

In order to comply with NEMA Section 23 (National Environmental Management Act) principles ofIntegrated Environmental Management a Basic Assessment Report was completed. A publicparticipation process (PPP) was undertaken for the proposed transmission line to investigate andassess any potential environmental impacts associated with the development prior to construction.As part of the BA process several specialist studies were conducted to evaluate potential impact thatthe proposed development could have on the study area.

19. Please describe how the principles of environmental management as set out in section 2of NEMA have been taken into account.

NEMA Section 2 (National Environmental Management Act) principles of environmental managementrequire that environmental management must place people and their needs at the forefront ofdevelopment and that development must be socially, environmentally and economically sustainable.These principles have been taken into account during the PPP in order to ensure that all Interestedand Affected Parties (I&APs) are given the opportunity to be involved in the process. I&AP’scomments are thus taken into consideration by the DEA when reviewing the application. Specialiststudies were conducted.

11. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES

List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to theapplication as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:


28

Title of legislation, policy orguideline

Applicability to the project Administeringauthority

Date

National EnvironmentalManagement Act, No. 107 of1998 (NEMA), as amended& NEMA EIA Regulations,2010: GN544, published inGovernment Gazette 33306on 18 June 2010

a Basic Assessment Report(BAR) is required for thisproject.

Department ofEnvironmental Affairs(DEA)

1998

National Water Act, No. 36 of1998

The proposed transmissionlines may trigger a section21(C and/or i) water use.

Department ofWater Affairs(DWA)

1998

National Heritage ResourcesAct (Act No 25 of 1999)

Resources could be identifiedduring construction phase

South African HeritageResourcesAgency

1999

Northern Cape NatureConservation Act (Act 9 of2009)

Protected Camel Thorn treesare located in servitude area ofproposed route alignment.

Department ofEnvironment andNature Conservation(DENC)

2009

National Forests Act (Act 84of 1998)

Protected Camel Thorn treesare located in servitude area ofproposed route alignment.

Department ofAgriculture, Forestryand Fisheries (DAFF

1998

12. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT

a) Solid waste management

Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiationphase?

YES√

NO

If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? +/- 6 m3

Small quantities of solid waste will be generated during the construction phase of the project. Thiswaste will be disposed at a licensed waste facility by the contractor..

How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

Solid waste will be generated during the construction phase of the project will be disposed at alicensed waste facility by the contractor.

Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?


29

This waste will be disposed at a licensed waste facility by the contractor.. The Municipalities in the study areahave existing waste facilities. As a mitigatory measure the contractor will be responsible for ensuring that allwaste is disposal at a licensed Waste facility .

Licensed facilities in the study area include:

Permit Number

WasteDisposalSite

Classification DateIssued

PermitHolder

PO Box Town Code

B33/2/350/18/P116 116 Kathu G:M:B- 28/03/1994 KathuMunicipality

P. O. Box1001

Kathu 8446

16/2/7/C251/D2/P287 287 Kheis G:C:B- 04/12/1997 LeliefonteinTransitionalCouncil

P. O. Box34

Garies 8220

16/2/7/V301/B2/Y2/P479 479 Prieska G:C:B- 14/04/2003 SiyathembaMunicipality

P. O. Box16

Prieska 8940

12/9/11/L176/8 MikrogolfDumpingSite

G:C:B- 02/02/2010 Sishen IronOre

PrivateBagX5066

Kathu 8446

12/9/11/L218/8 SishenSouthHazardousWasteStorage

H:H 31/3/2010 SishenSouth IronOreCompany(Pty) Ltd

P.O. Box9679Centurion

Kathu

Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES NO √If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3

How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

If the solid waste will be disposed of into a municipal waste stream, indicate which registered landfillsite will be used.

Where will the solid waste be disposed of if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)?

If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill siteor be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competentauthority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the NEM:WA? YES NO √If YES, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA. Anapplication for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application.


30

Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment facility? YES NO√If YES, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it isnecessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in termsof the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application.

b) Liquid effluent

Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposed ofin a municipal sewage system?

YES NO √If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3

Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? YES NO√If YES, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessaryto change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at anotherfacility?

YES NO√If YES, provide the particulars of the facility:Facility name:Contactperson:Postaladdress:Postal code:Telephone: Cell:E-mail: Fax:

Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

No water will be used during operational phase

c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere other that exhaust emissionsand dust associated with construction phase activities?

YES NO √

If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO√If YES, the applicant must consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary tochange to an application for scoping and EIA.If NO, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:During the construction phase, dust and vehicular emissions will be released as a result of vehiclemovements. However these emissions will have a short term impact on the immediate surroundingarea and thus no authorisation will be required for such emissions. Appropriate dust suppressionmeasures must be implemented (e.g. removal of vegetation in a phased manner and using recycledwater for spraying dust to reduce the impacts).

Dust generated during construction will not exceed limits proposed Notice 309 of 2011 NationalEnvironmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004. (Act 39 0f 2004), Draft National Dust ControlRegulations


31

d) Waste permit

Will any aspect of the activity produce waste that will require a waste permit in termsof the NEM:WA?

YES NO√

If YES, please submit evidence that an application for a waste permit has been submitted to thecompetent authority

e) Generation of noise

Will the activity generate noise? YES NO √If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO√If YES, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessaryto change to an application for scoping and EIA.If NO, describe the noise in terms of type and level:A limited amount of noise would be generated during the construction phase by construction vehiclesand construction activities. It will however be short term, localised and will last during theconstruction phase. In order to minimise the impacts of noise during the construction phase,construction activities should be restricted to between 07H00 and 17H00 Monday to Friday. This isrequired in order to avoid noise and lighting disturbances outside of normal working hours. Allconstruction equipment must be maintained and kept in good working order to minimise associatednoise impacts. If required, adequate noise suppression measures (i.e. screens, etc) must be erectedaround the point source of construction and/or operational noise pollution to reduce noise to anacceptable level.

13. WATER USE

Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriatebox(es):

Municipal Water board GroundwaterRiver, stream,dam or lake

OtherThe activity will

not use water √

If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any othernatural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month:

Zero litres

Does the activity require a water use authorisation (general authorisation or wateruse license) from the Department of Water Affairs?

YES NO√If YES, please provide proof that the application has been submitted to the Department of WaterAffairs.

14. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energyefficient:


32

The project is the construction of a distribution line and does not use energy. Eskom however hasintroduced and champions the 49m campaign which aims to reduce National energy usage by 10%,which would be as effective as the construction of a new power station, without the potential carbonemission or cost. .

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design ofthe activity, if any:

The project is the construction of a distribution line and does not use energy. Eskom however hasintroduced and champions the 49m campaign which aims to reduce National energy usage by 10%,which would be as effective as the construction of a new power station, without the potential carbonemission or cost. .


33

SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Important notes:1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be

necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly differentenvironment. In such cases please complete copies of Section B and indicate the area, which iscovered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.

Section B Copy No. (e.g. A):

2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.

3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES√ NO

If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for eachspecialist thus appointed and attach it in Appendix I. All specialist reports must be contained inAppendix D.

Propertydescription/physical address:

Province Northern CapeDistrictMunicipality

The eastern section of the study area around Kathu fallsunder the jurisdiction of the John Taolo GaetseweDistrict Municipality (formerly known as the KgalagadiDistrict Municipality). The central and western area fallswithin the Siyanda District Municipality.

Local Municipality Gamagara Local Municipality;Tsantsabane Local Municipality; and!Kheis Local Municipality

Ward Number(s)Farm name andnumber

See Appendix E 5

Portion number See Appendix E 5SG Code See Appendix E 5

Where a large number of properties are involved (e.g. linear activities), pleaseattach a full list to this application including the same information as indicatedabove.See Appendix E 5

Current land-usezoning as perlocal municipalityIDP/records:

Industrial and mining around the Kathu and Sishen Areas. Agriculture rest ofroute alternative alignments.

In instances where there is more than one current land-use zoning, pleaseattach a list of current land use zonings that also indicate which portions eachuse pertains to, to this application.

Is a change of land-use or a consent use application required? YES NO√


34

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE

Indicate the general gradient of the site.

Alternative S1: 400kV Transmission line:Flat 1:50 – 1:20

√1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10

√1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper

than 1:5

Alternative S2: 400kV Transmission line:Flat 1:50 – 1:20

√1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10

√1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper

than 1:5


35

Alternative S3:Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper

than 1:5

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE

Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:

2.1 Ridgeline 2.4 Closed valley 2.7 Undulating plain / low hills2.2 Plateau 2.5 Open valley √ 2.8 Dune

2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain √ 2.6 Plain √ 2.9 Seafront

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE

Is the site(s) located on any of the following?400kV Route AlternativesAlternative S1: Alternative S2 Alternative S3:

Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep) YES NO√ YES NO√ YES NO

Dolomite, sinkhole or doline areas YES

√NO

YES

√NO YES NO

Seasonally wet soils (often close to waterbodies)

YES

√NO

YES

√NO YES NO

Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes withloose soil

YES NO√ YES NO√ YES NO

Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water) YES NO√ YES NO√ YES NO

Soils with high clay content (clay fraction morethan 40%)

YES NO√ YES NO√ YES NO

Any other unstable soil or geological feature YES

√NO

YES

√NO YES NO

An area sensitive to erosion YES

√NO

YES

√NO YES NO

If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may bean issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in thecompletion of this section. Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of theproject information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scaleRegional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted.

Geology and Soil:


36

AEOLIAN DUNESM. J. van der Walt Engineering Geologist CC (2013) describes that Aeolian sand covers significantportions of the proposed route alignments. Extensive areas covered by dunes are located either side ofthe Skurweberge (Fig 2). These longitudinal dunes are orientated in a northwest-southeast direction,the prevailing wind direction. Loss of vegetation cover in these areas will be associated withaccelerated wind erosion.

The ARC table below indicates that the study area has very little high potential land, and although largeareas of deep sandy soils occur, they are not regarded as being of high potential, due either to theirrapid drainage and/or the presence of dunes. In addition it can be seen that the soils in the areaconsist mainly of red and yellow sands, mainly of the Hutton (Hu) and Clovelly (Cv) forms, occasionallywith dunes, especially in the south. Smaller areas of shallow, lithosols of the Mispah (Ms), Glenrosa(Gs) and Hutton (Hu) forms, along with rock, also occur.

Property

Land type

Dominant soils Sub-dominant soils Slopes Agricultural

Potential (%)

Ae4 Hu33/34 Ms10/22 (100-250 1-2% H: 0.0

(450-1000 mm), mm), Sa, 41% M: 47.0

Sa, 42% Sw11/21 (20-200 mm), ClLm-

Cl, 10%

L: 53.0

Ae5 Hu30/31/33/34 Hu32/35/36 (>1200 mm) 1-2% H: 24.4

(>1200 mm), mm), M: 74.1


37

Sa-LmSa, 48% Sa, 44% L: 1.5

Ae6 Hu30/31/33/34 Hu32/35/36 (>1200 1-2% H: 24.4

(>1200 mm), mm), M: 74.1

Sa-LmSa, 48% Sa, 44% L: 1.5

Ae7 Hu36 Hu33/36 (100-300 3-12% H: 0.0

(300-1200 mm), mm), M: 53.3

SaLm-SaClLm,

39%

LmSa-SaLm, 30%

Rock, 18%

L: 46.7

Ae210 Hu30/31/33/34 Rock & lithosols (<300 1-2% H: 0.0

(900-1200 mm), mm), 18% M:82.4

Sa-LmSa, 71% L: 17.6

Af7 Hu30/33/34 Hu30/31 (>1200 mm), 1-2% H: 0.0

(600-1200 mm), Sa (dunes), 40% M:58.0

Sa, 58% L: 42.0

Af29 Hu30/31/33/34 Hu30/31 (>1200 mm), 1-2% H: 0.0

(600-1200 mm), Sa (dunes), 28% M:58.3

Ag110 Hu30/33 Ms10/12/20/22 (<300 1-2% H: 0.0

(<300 mm), mm), Sa-LmSa, 26% M: 18.5

Sa, 55% Hu33/36 (450-900 mm), LmSa-

SaClLm, 18%

L:81.5

Ah1 Hu33/Cv33 Hu30/Cv30 (>1200 mm), 1-2% H: 0.0

(>1200 mm), Sa, 36% M: 100.0

Sa-LmSa, 54% L:0.0

Ic2 Rock, 86% Hu30/33/34 (50-250 2-50% H: 0.0

mm), Sa-LmSa, 8% M: 4.1

L:95.9

Ic2 Rock, 80% Hu30/Ms10 (50-250 mm), 4-60% H: 0.0

Sa-LmSa, 11% M: 8.0

L: 91.0

Figure 8. Agriculture Potential

4. GROUNDCOVER

Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site. The location of all identified rare or endangeredspecies or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s).Natural veld -good condition E

√

Natural veld withscattered aliensE

√

Natural veld withheavy alieninfestationE

Veld dominatedby alien speciesE

Gardens

Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Building or other Bare soil


38

structure

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in thecompletion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessaryexpertise.

The majority of the two route alternatives are located in the savanna biome. Du Preez states thatnumerous savanna – types can be distinguished in the savanna biome. These variations are the resultof variations in climate (mainly a rainfall gradient), topography as well as substrate (geology and soiltype). These different savanna units can be distinguished on structure (height of trees and shrubs), andspecies composition (Van Rooyen & Bredenkamp 1996). Tree layers may be absent or presentdepending mainly on dep sand deposits as well as availability of moisture. The shrub layer is fairly welldeveloped and individuals of Black Thorn (Acacia mellifera), Weeping Candle Thorn (Acaciahebeclada), Karee-thorn (Lycium hirsutum), Raisin bush (Grewia flava), Camphor bush (Tarchonanthuscamphoratus), (Acacia tortilis) and Vaal Camel Thorn (Acacia haematoxylon) dominate this layer (VanRooyen & Bredenkamp 1996

Figure 9. Biomes

Du Preez describes that tree layers may be absent or present depending mainly on deep sand depositsas well as availability of moisture. The shrub layer is fairly well developed and individuals of BlackThorn (Acacia mellifera), Weeping Candle Thorn (Acacia hebeclada), Karee-thorn (Lycium hirsutum),Raisin bush (Grewia flava), Camphor bush (Tarchonanthus camphoratus), (Acacia tortilis) and VaalCamel Thorn (Acacia haematoxylon) dominate this layer (Van Rooyen & Bredenkamp 1996).


39

The grass layer is relatively well-developed in places the cover depends on the amount of rainfallduring the growing season. Lehman’s Love grass (Eragrostis lehmanniana), Sour Bushman grass(Schmidtia kalahariensis), Silky Bushman grass (Stipagrostis ciliata) and Stipagrostis obtusa candominate areas (Van Rooyen & Bredenkamp 1996). Due to the palatability of the vegetation, presenceof sweet grasses and sometimes relatively high livestock densities, grazing and browsing could have amajor influence on the vegetation structure. Black Thorn (Acacia mellifera) tends to encroach intodegraded areas and sometimes forms very dense impenetrable stand

5. SURFACE WATER

Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites?

Perennial River YES NO√ UNSURE

Non-Perennial River YES√ NO UNSURE

Permanent Wetland YES NO√ UNSURE

Seasonal Wetland YES NO√ UNSURE

Artificial Wetland YES√ NO UNSURE

Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland YES NO √ UNSURE

If any of the boxes marked YES or UNSURE is ticked, please provide a description of the relevantwatercourse.

The proposed route alternative alignments cross two watercourses west of Sishen, namely the Ga-Mogara River and the Olifantsloop near Olifantshoek The Ga-Mogara River and Olifantsloop are non-perennial stream and are tributaries of the Orange River.

Figure 10. Surface Water


40

ENDORHEIC PANSM. J. van der Walt Engineering Geologist CC (2013) describes these pans are circular or oval inshape and shallow, even when fully inundated, and usually less than 3m deep. Endorheic pans arereferred to as “small closed basins” due to no “outlet” present of the drainage system. Inundation ischaracteristically ephemeral and in the most arid regions pans can stand dry for years betweentemporary flooding. Water loss from pans is largely due to evaporation, and with the low precipitationcontributes to the pans usually desiccated state.

No large or significant pans are present along any of the routes. Several small pans may be affectedby the proposed alignments. Pans and their associated environs need to be excluded and/or avoidedas possible locations for pylons in terms of the National Water Act (NWA). If the construction of apylon in one of these areas is unavoidable, permission will have to be obtained from the Departmentof Water Affairs.

6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA

Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site andgive description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:

Natural area √ Dam or reservoir √ Polo fields

Low density residential Hospital/medical centre Filling station H

Medium density residential School Landfill or waste treatment site √High density residential √ Tertiary education facility Plantation

Informal residential A √ Church Agriculture √Retail commercial & warehousing Old age home River, stream or wetland √Light industrial Sewage treatment plant A√ Nature conservation area

Medium industrial AN √ Train station or shunting yard√ N Mountain, koppie or ridge √Heavy industrialAN √ Railway line √ N √ Museum

Power station Major road (4 lanes or more) N Historical buildingOffice/consulting room Airport N Protected AreaMilitary or policebase/station/compound

Harbour Graveyard

Spoil heap or slimes damA √ Sport facilities Archaeological site

Quarry, sand or borrow pit √ Golf course Other land uses (describe)

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by theproposed activity?

The proposed transmission line will not have any impact or be impacted upon by the SishenSaldanha Railway line


41

If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by theproposed activity? Specify and explain:

The proposed transmission line will not have any impact or be impacted upon by the Sishen Iron Mineor other mining activities in the area.

Map 7 Section 1 of the updated Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) states that the alignment appears tocross over a section of the informal settlement located immediately west of the Shelela Village and aminor deviation is suggested for this section of the power line, in order to avoid the aforementionedbuilt-up area. The route alignment does NOT cross over the informal settlement.

Map 7 Section 2 of the updated VIA mentions that the landowners of farm Fritz 540 expressed concernover the construction of the transmission line across their property. These coments were made duringthe 2006 Public Participation Process. Subsequent to these concerns being raised, the landowner,Sishen Mine has signed a servitude agreement with Eskom for the proposed 400kV line. Mostlandowners have signed servitude agreements with Eskom for the proposed Ferrum Garona 400kVline. Negotiations with landowner of farm Commissie 649 are underway. Thus all affected landownersconsent to proposed line. See Figure 11.

Figure 11. Signed Servitude Agreements

If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by theproposed activity? Specify and explain:

No heritage resources identified in proposed transmission line route alternatives by specialist report.


42

Does the proposed site (including any alternative sites) fall within any of the following:

Critical Biodiversity Area (as per provincial conservation plan) YES NO√Core area of a protected area? YES NO √Buffer area of a protected area? YES NO √Planned expansion area of an existing protected area? YES NO √Existing offset area associated with a previous Environmental Authorisation? YES NO √Buffer area of the SKA? YES NO √

The Ferrum – Garona transmission line does not fall within the proposed Karoo Central AstronomyAdvantage Area (1, 2 or 3). See Figure 12

Figure 12. SKA area

If the answer to any of these questions was YES, a map indicating the affected area must be includedin Appendix A.

7. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined insection 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999),including Archaeological or paleontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to thesite? If YES, explain:

YES NO √

Uncertain


43

If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field (archaeology orpalaeontology) to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Brieflyexplain the findings of the specialist:

No sites, features or objects of cultural heritage significance were identified in the study area by thespecialist, Cobus Dreyer. The Kathu Townlands, Kathu pan, Hartnolls 458 and Uitkoms 463archaeological sites are in the Kathu area but outside the 4 kilometre corridor that is being assessedfor this Basic Assessment Report. Mitigation measures and methodology is provided in EMPr ifunidentified heritage resources are found during construction phase.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO √ Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage ResourcesAct, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO √If YES, please provide proof that this permit application has been submitted to SAHRA or the relevantprovincial authority.

8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTER

a) Local Municipality

Please provide details on the socio-economic character of the local municipality in which the proposedsite(s) are situated.

Level of unemployment:

The 2011 Census data indicates the following:

DISTRICT AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN THE STUDYAREA

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENTRATE

Kgalagadi District Municipality (now John Taolo GaetseweDistrict Municipality)

29.7 % 37.2 %

Gamagara Local Municipality 17.7 % 22.4 %

Siyanda District Municipality 19.2 % 22.7 %

Tsantsabane Local Municipality 26.1 % 32.3 %

!Kheis Local Municipality 28 % 34.3 %

It appears that, from the date of the previous SIA, the overall unemployment levels within the studyarea have increased. It should, however, be noted that sources where the information was obtainedcould interpret the definition of unemployment slightly different and therefore different figures couldprevail. However, from the above figures it is still evident that there is a serious challenge in creatingemployment opportunities within the study area.Unskilled occupations also account for the largest share of employment (54%) followed by skilled(26%) and semi-skilled (20%) in the Gamagara LM. As the major employers are mining andagriculture, diversification of the economic base would also be required. The lack of skills andunemployment rates would further have some direct impacts on the income levels and theseindividuals’ ability to pay for services.Based on the above poverty levels as well as income levels in the area are also expected to be high.


44

Economic profile of local municipality:

Infrastructure

The main roads through the study area are the N14 connecting Upington, Kathu and Kuruman, aswell as the N10 connecting Upington and Groblershoop. The rest of the connecting roads in the areaconsist of smaller tarred roads or gravel roads, which are often in an unsatisfactory condition. Thesepoor road conditions cause poor access and usage of all modes of transport and associated facilities.Various projects are planned to address this issue. The railway line from Sishen to Saldanha Bay isused to transport iron ore to its export market.

Basic Services

The majority of the households in the study area have access to electricity for lighting purposes.Although many now have access to the flushing sewer system, major developments in this regard isstill required especially within the !Kheis Local Municipal area. From the table below it is also clearthat the provision of water and sanitation services thus remains important in the study area. Anoutline of the level of basic services provided to households within the District and LocalMunicipalities within the study area, is provided below:

BASIC SERVICES TO HOUSEHOLDS: 2011 STATISTICS

DISTRICT AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITIESWITHIN THE STUDY AREA

FLUSH TOILETCONNECTED TO

SEWERAGE

WEEKLYREFUSE

REMOVAL

PIPED WATERINSIDE DWELLING

ELECTRICITYFOR LIGHTING

Kgalagadi District Municipality (now JohnTaolo Gaetsewe District Municipality)

26.2 % 26 % 22.6 % 87 %

Gamagara Local Municipality 77.6 % 90.6 % 59.1 % 87.9 %Siyanda District Municipality 63.9 % 70.3 % 48.5 % 86.6 %

Tsantsabane Local Municipality 66.7 % 57.4 % 45.3 % 83.5 %!Kheis Local Municipality 27 % 53.3 % 16.7 % 74 %

Tourism Sectors

The main tourist attractions of the Northern Cape Province are the Augrabies Falls National Park, 120km west of Upington along the Orange River, as well as the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park on theborder with Namibia and Botswana which fall outside the study area. The most prominent attractionin the study area is the Sishen Mine which is one of the largest open pit cast iron ore mines in theworld, although it does not necessarily attract large numbers of tourists to the area.

Tourist related establishments in the region (not on route alternative alignments) are the WitsandNature Reserve (to the south of the alignment), individual game farms where hunting mainly takesplace within the winter months, as well as 4 x 4 routes and the development of water related tourismaround the Orange River and at the Boegoeberg Dam. Thuru Lodge Private Game Reserve is alsosituated near Groblershoop.

Profile of the Regional Economy

Although mining and agriculture are the main industries in the Northern Cape Province, this provincehas the smallest economy of the nine provinces. As with the province’s economy, the economies of


45

the District and Local Municipalities are largely dominated by mining, quarrying and agriculture.Recent expansions at the Sishen Iron Ore Mine and the establishment of the Khumani Minecontributed to the growth in the local economy.

Furthermore, the agricultural sector’s share in the local economy is also growing due to the promisinggrape production for export purposes, as well as the development taking place in the livestock andgame farming sectors. Tourism is also fast becoming an important contributor to the local economyas more tourists are attracted to the distinguished desert landscape with relative accessibility.

Level of education:

The education profiles within the District and Local Municipalities within the study area are as follows(2011 statistics):

DISTRICT AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN THESTUDY AREA

NO SCHOOLING MATRIC HIGHEREDUCATION

Kgalagadi District Municipality (now John TaoloGaetsewe District Municipality)

14.6 % 7.9 % 21.1 %

Gamagara Local Municipality 10.5 % 11.3 % 27.8 %

Siyanda District Municipality 9.5 % 6 % 21.9 %

Tsantsabane Local Municipality 13.7 % 6 % 25.6 %

!Kheis Local Municipality 13.5 % 4.4 % 14.1 %

b) Socio-economic value of the activity

What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? RWhat is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of theactivity?

R

Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES√ NO

Is the activity a public amenity? YES√ NO

How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development andconstruction phase of the activity/ies?What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during thedevelopment and construction phase?

R

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? %How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during theoperational phase of the activity?What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during thefirst 10 years?

R

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? %


46

9. BIODIVERSITY

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of thebiodiversity occurring on the site and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. To assist with theidentification of the biodiversity occurring on site and the ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.orgor [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GISUnit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used. A map of the relevant biodiversityinformation (including an indication of the habitat conditions as per (b) below) and must be provided asan overlay map to the property/site plan as Appendix D to this report.

a) Indicate the applicable biodiversity planning categories of all areas on site and indicatethe reason(s) provided in the biodiversity plan for the selection of the specific area aspart of the specific category)

Systematic Biodiversity Planning CategoryIf CBA or ESA, indicate the reason(s) for itsselection in biodiversity plan

CriticalBiodiversityArea (CBA)

EcologicalSupport

Area(ESA)

OtherNatural

Area

(ONA) √

No NaturalArea

Remaining(NNR)

b) Indicate and describe the habitat condition on site

Habitat Condition

Percentage ofhabitat

conditionclass (addingup to 100%)

Description and additional Comments andObservations

(including additional insight into condition, e.g. poorland management practises, presence of quarries,

grazing, harvesting regimes etc).

Natural 90%Agricultural land. Mainly used for grazing

Near Natural(includes areas with

low to moderate levelof alien invasive

plants)

5%

Areas with infestation with alien Mesquite (Prosopis spp.)

Degraded(includes areas

heavily invaded byalien plants)

1%

Alien invested mining areas

Transformed(includes cultivation,

dams, urban,plantation, roads, etc)

4%

Mining areas close to Kathu and Sishen.

The SANBI National list of threatened terrestrial ecosystems for South Africa (2011) shows that theentire study is in a “ Least Threatened area. See Figure 13 below.

http://bgis.sanbi.org/

mailto:[email protected]


47

Figure 13. Ecosystem Status

The South African Land Cover Atlas shows the area is used mostly for agriculture. See Figure 14below.

Figure 14. Land Use


48

c) Complete the table to indicate:(i) the type of vegetation, including its ecosystem status, present on the site; and(ii) whether an aquatic ecosystem is present on site.

Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems

Ecosystem threatstatus as per the

NationalEnvironmentalManagement:

Biodiversity Act (ActNo. 10 of 2004)

Critical Wetland (including rivers,depressions, channelled andunchanneled wetlands, flats,

seeps pans, and artificialwetlands)

Estuary CoastlineEndangered

Vulnerable

Least

Threatened√ YES√ NO UNSURE YES NO√ YESNO

√


49

d) Please provide a description of the vegetation type and/or aquatic ecosystem present onsite, including any important biodiversity features/information identified on site (e.g.threatened species and special habitats)

VEGETATION TYPES

Mucina & Rutherford identified the following vegetation types in the study area: Kathu Bushveld Koranna-Langeberg Mountain Bushveld Olifantshoek Plains Thornveld Gordonia Plains Shrubland Kalahari Karroid shrublan

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM

Du Preez (2013) discusses that the Acacia karroo – Ziziphus mucronata riparian community, whichoccurs along the banks of the Gamagara River is in a relatively moderate state of degradation due tograzing and human impacts (See Figure 15) . The riparian shrub community forms narrow strips alongthe river banks. A number of footpaths and vehicle tracks were also noted. No tree layer exists. Theshrub layer is dominated by Sweet Thorn (Acacia karroo) (D) and Buffalo Thorn (Ziziphus mucronata)(D) shrubs. The grass layer is dominated by Red grass (Themeda triandra) (D) and Love grass(Eragrostis spp) (D). A few alien plants were also noted in the area (Prosopis velutina, Schinus molle).


50

Figure 15. Acacia karroo – Ziziphus mucronata riparian community.

AVIFAUNA

The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT, 2006& 2013) specialist report found that the proposed Ferrum-Garona line is faced with a somewhat unique situation in that the existing 275kV line is usedextensively by several bird species to nest in. Sociable Weavers make their nests in the waist of theexisting towers and some of these nests are in turn used by a variety of raptors as nesting substrate bynesting on top of it. Some of the nests chambers themselves are used by Pygmy Falcons to breed in.

The EWT report also highlights that construction activities of the new 400kV line next to the existing275kV line will have an impact on the breeding population of large raptors on the 275kV line. Thebreeding season for the large raptor species is from March to November. The most critical period withinthis time span is from April to May in the beginning when the eggs are incubated. Another sensitiveperiod is from October to November at the end when the young birds are almost ready to fledge. Earlyin the breeding season the risk of desertion by the adults if disturbed are bigger than later, when theyoung bird is on the nest and being fed by the adults. At the end of the breeding season the young birdmay be tempted to jump out of the nest and fly prematurely if disturbed, resulting in injury or evendeath. Every attempt will have to be made to restrict the disturbance of these birds to a minimum duringconstruction

FAUNA

Terrestrial mammals

List of Red Data some Terrestrial Mammals that could be found in the study area (Smithers 1986):

• Aardwolf Proteles cristatus


51

• African Striped weasel Poecilogale albinucha

• African Wild Cat Felis lybica

• Antbear Orycteropus afer

• Honey Badger Mellivora capensis

• Small spotted Cat Felis nigripes

• South African Hedgehog Artelerix frontalis

• White-tailed mouse Mystromys albicaudata

• Brown hyena Hyanena brunnea

Most of the above-mentioned animals are free roaming animals and could be present in the study area.

They are not very habitat restricted and could occur in any of the above mentioned major plant

communities. In those areas accessed during the survey by du Preez (2006) no signs of the presence

of these animals were found .

.


52

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

1. ADVERTISEMENT AND NOTICE

Publication name VolksbladDate published 15 February 2013. Invitation to comment

7 June 2013. Public Review of Draft BARSite notice position Latitude Longitude

27° 41.971’ 23° 3.003’27° 43.729’ 23° 3.420’27° 56.314’ 22° 44.262’28° 53.654’ 21° 58.921’28° 51.375’ 22° 1.301’

Date placed 14 February 2013

Include proof of the placement of the relevant advertisements and notices in Appendix E1.

2. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES

Provide details of the measures taken to include all potential I&APs as required by Regulation 54(2)(e)and 54(7) of GN R.543.

Key stakeholders (other than organs of state) identified in terms of Regulation 54(2)(b) of GN R.543:

Title, Name andSurname

Affiliation/ key stakeholderstatus

Contact details (tel number or e-mailaddress)

Letladi Maisela Environmental ManagerKumba Iron OreSishen Mine

053 – 739 3675; 083 304 0547;[email protected] van Eck Street, Kathu, 8446,South Africa

Werner Voigt Project Leader (Air Quality;EIA;s; Biodiversity):Kumba Iron OreSishen Mine

053 – 739 2821; 083 417 8306;[email protected] van Eck Street, Kathu, 8446,South Africa

Jacky Sterrenberg Kumba Iron Ore [email protected]




53

Sishen Mine

Include proof that the key stakeholder received written notification of the proposed activities asAppendix E2. This proof may include any of the following:

e-mail delivery reports; registered mail receipts; courier waybills; signed acknowledgements of receipt; and/or or any other proof as agreed upon by the competent authority.

3. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

Summary of main issues raised by I&APs Summary of response from EAPNo Comments to date. No Comments to date.

4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT

The practitioner must record all comments received from I&APs and respond to each comment beforethe Draft BAR is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments andresponse report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to the Final BAR as Appendix E3.

5. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION

Authorities and organs of state identified as key stakeholders:

Authority/Organof State

Contactperson (Title,Name andSurname)

Tel No FaxNo

e-mail Postaladdress

Mac GregorMuseum,ArchaeologyHead ofDepartment -David Morris

David Morris [email protected]

Siyanda (ZFMgcawu) DistrictMunicipality

MunicipalManagerMr EricNgxanga

[email protected]

Department ofTourism,Environment and

Director:EnvironmentalManagement

[email protected]




54

Conservation Adv JuliusMutyorauta

Department ofTourism,Environment andConservation

Dineo Moleko 0538077467

[email protected]

Gamagara localMunicipality

EnvironmentalManagerMr PierreBurger

[email protected]

Gamagara localMunicipality

Town PlanningManager MrJohann Burger

[email protected]

SANRAL Rene de Kock [email protected]

DepartmentAgriculture,Forestry &Fisheries

Jacolien Mans [email protected]

Include proof that the Authorities and Organs of State received written notification of the proposedactivities as appendix E4.

In the case of renewable energy projects, Eskom and the SKA Project Office must be included in the listof Organs of State.

6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

Note that, for any activities (linear or other) where deviation from the public participation requirementsmay be appropriate, the person conducting the public participation process may deviate from therequirements of that sub-regulation to the extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by thecompetent authority.

Proof of any such agreement must be provided, where applicable. Application for any deviation fromthe regulations relating to the public participation process must be submitted prior to thecommencement of the public participation process.

A list of registered I&APs must be included as appendix E5.

Copies of any correspondence and minutes of any meetings held must be included in Appendix E6.



55

SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2010,and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affectedparties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts.

1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSEDMANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

Provide a summary and anticipated significance of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impactsthat are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design phase, construction phase, operationalphase, decommissioning and closure phase, including impacts relating to the choice ofsite/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures that may eliminate or reduce thepotential impacts listed. This impact assessment must be applied to all the identified alternatives to theactivities identified in Section A(2) of this report.

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigationConstruction PhaseAlternative 1 (preferred alternative)Impacts onAgriculture

Direct impacts: Loss of highpotential agricultural land.

Low No infrastructure to be placedin high potential agriculturalland.

Indirect impacts: Loss of grazing Low

Cumulative impacts: Loss ofviable agriculture units

Low

Impacts onAvifauna

Direct impacts: Disturbance andhabitat destruction

Medium Strict control should bemaintained over all activitiesduring construction, inparticular heavy machinery andvehicle movements, and staff.Ensure that the constructionEnvironmental ManagementPlan is adhered to.

Indirect impacts: Potential impacton breeding raptors

Medium Identification of high risk towerson existing line to ascertainwhere mitigation will be needed

Cumulative impacts: Preferredroute alternative is located awayfrom potential avifaunal habitat. Nosignificant cumulative impactsanticipated

Medium

Impacts onAquaticHabitats

Direct impacts: No direct Impactsanticipated.

Low No infrastructure planned inaquatic habitats

Indirect impacts: None Low No infrastructure planned in


56

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigationanticipated aquatic habitats

Cumulative impacts:None anticipated


Impacts onFauna

Direct impacts: Potential Loss offauna

Low Ensure that no animals areharmed during constructionphase.

Indirect impacts: Low

Cumulative impacts: Low

Impacts onFlora

Direct impacts: Loss ofendangered and protected plants.Erosion, and spread of alieninvasive plants.

Medium Search and rescue of protectedplants where possible. A fewprotected species occur in thearea and include:Nerine laticoma,Harpagophyum procumbens,Acacia erioloba,Acacia haematoxylon andBoscia albitrunca.During construction a searchand rescue exercise must beundertaken. If any protectedAcacia species (Camel thorn)are to be cut or removed, apermit must be obtained fromDept of Forestry.

Indirect impacts: Potential loss ofprotected species and associatedhabitat.

As for Direct Impacts

Cumulative impacts: Potentialloss of protected species andassociated habitat.


GeotechnicalImpacts

Direct impacts: None anticipated Low None anticipated

Indirect impacts: Noneanticipated

Low None anticipated

Cumulative impacts: Noneanticipated


Impacts onHeritageResources

Direct impacts: No heritageresources identified in proposedroute alternatives

Low No heritage resourcesidentified. However if anyresources are found duringexcavations, the EMPrprovides guidance

Indirect impacts: No heritageresources identified in proposed

Low No heritage resourcesidentified. However if any


57

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigationroute alternatives resources are found during

excavations, the EMPrprovides guidance

Cumulative impacts: No heritageresources identified in proposedroute alternatives


SocialImpacts

Direct impacts: Inflow ofJobseekers, Impact on Daily Livingand Movement Patterns, Impacton land use and futuredevelopments, Impact on Sense ofPlace, Impact on Tourism

Low

Indirect impacts: Inflow ofJobseekers, Impact on Daily Livingand Movement Patterns, Impacton land use and futuredevelopments, Impact on Sense ofPlace, Impact on Tourism

Low

Cumulative impacts: Inflow ofJobseekers, Impact on Daily Livingand Movement Patterns, Impacton land use and futuredevelopments, Impact on Sense ofPlace, Impact on Tourism

Low

VisualImpacts

Direct impacts: Low



Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation

Construction PhaseAlternative 2Impacts onAgriculture

Direct impacts: Loss of highpotential agricultural land.

Low No infrastructure to be placedin high potential agriculturalland.

Indirect impacts: Loss of grazing Low

Cumulative impacts: Loss ofviable agriculture units

Low

Impacts onAvifauna

Direct impacts: Disturbance andhabitat destruction

Medium Strict control should bemaintained over all activitiesduring construction, inparticular heavy machinery andvehicle movements, and staff.


58

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigationEnsure that the constructionEnvironmental ManagementPlan is adhered to.

Indirect impacts: Potential impacton breeding raptors

Medium Identification of high risk towerson existing line to ascertainwhere mitigation will be needed

Cumulative impacts: Preferredroute alternative is located awayfrom potential avifaunal habitat. Nosignificant cumulative impactsanticipated

Medium

Impacts onAquaticHabitats

Direct impacts: No direct Impactsanticipated.




Cumulative impacts:None anticipated


Impacts onFauna

Direct impacts: Potential Loss offauna

Low Ensure that no animals areharmed during constructionphase.



Impacts onFlora

Direct impacts: Loss ofendangered and protected plants.Erosion, and spread of alieninvasive plants.

Medium Search and rescue of protectedplants where possible. A fewprotected species occur in thearea and include:Nerine laticoma,Harpagophyum procumbens,Acacia erioloba,Acacia haematoxylon andBoscia albitrunca.During construction a searchand rescue exercise must beundertaken. If any protectedAcacia species (Camel thorn)are to be cut or removed, apermit must be obtained fromDept of Forestry.

Indirect impacts: Potential loss ofprotected species and associatedhabitat.


Cumulative impacts: Potentialloss of protected species and



59

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigationassociated habitat.

GeotechnicalImpacts

Direct impacts: None anticipated Low None anticipated



Cumulative impacts: Noneanticipated


Impacts onHeritageResources

Direct impacts: No heritageresources identified in proposedroute alternatives


Indirect impacts: No heritageresources identified in proposedroute alternatives


Cumulative impacts: No heritageresources identified in proposedroute alternatives


SocialImpacts

Direct impacts: Inflow ofJobseekers, Impact on Daily Livingand Movement Patterns, Impacton land use and futuredevelopments, Impact on Sense ofPlace, Impact on Tourism

Low

Indirect impacts: Inflow ofJobseekers, Impact on Daily Livingand Movement Patterns, Impacton land use and futuredevelopments, Impact on Sense ofPlace, Impact on Tourism

Low

Cumulative impacts: Inflow ofJobseekers, Impact on Daily Livingand Movement Patterns, Impacton land use and futuredevelopments, Impact on Sense ofPlace, Impact on Tourism

Low

VisualImpacts

Direct impacts: Low



No-go option


60

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigationDirect impacts:

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

A complete impact assessment in terms of Regulation 22(2)(i) of GN R.543 must be included asAppendix F.

2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impactstatement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on theenvironment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, withspecific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actuallyoccurring and the significance of impacts.

Alternative A (preferred alternative)AvifaunaThe EWT confirmed that the proposed project changes do not present any change in the significanceof the impacts on relevant species as previously assessed. The status quo remains and the findingsand recommendations of the original avifaunal report are still valid. Therefore Alternative 1 will bethe preferred option from a bird collision point of view”. Alternative 1 (which follows an existing275kV line) remains the preferred option from an avifaunal perspective, if the mitigation andmanagement measures described in the original report are adhered to.

Fauna and FloraThe results reveal that Alternative 1 & 2 are very similar as far as site specific results are concerned.However Alternative 1 poses a lower impact as it is situated along the existing power line. Theresults of the vegetation and terrestrial animal assessment reveal that Alternative 1 and 2 areacceptable routes

GeotechnicalThe proposed route alternatives are comparable in terms of their potential impacts on the landscape.Alternative 1 however follows an existing transmission line and therefore a maintenance track isalready in place.

HeritageThe proposed route alternatives are comparable in terms of their potential impacts on heritageresources.

Social Impact The majority of the negative social impacts are anticipated to respond to mitigation. The possible negative impacts on the visual environment and sense of place remain of

concern. Safety and security concerns, and possible health related impacts should be pro-actively

addressed.


61

As indicated in the initial SIA, the alignment should avoid dwellings, tourist establishments,sensitive receptors and mining activities.

The proposed transmission line with the deviation section can be implemented. It must,however, be ensured that the mitigation measures proposed in the initial SIA and as stated inthis document are strictly implemented.

Visual ImpactThe results of the visual impact assessment (VIA) and the subsequent selection of transmission linealternative 1 as the preferred alignment reflects the basic distinction between "brown fields" and“green fields" developments. The existing transmission line and the railway line create aninfrastructure corridor within which the proposed transmission line should ideally be located. Thebenefits of utilising existing infrastructure, such as access roads, servitudes, etc. ensure thecontainment of the transmission line's visual impact within the region.

Alternative B

AvifaunaThe EWT analysis is clear that Alternative 2 has a higher risk in terms of the bird collision risks posedby the proposed power line.

GeotechnicalThe proposed route alternatives are comparable in terms of their potential impacts on the landscape,although the cumulative impacts (tower footprints and maintenance track) associated with the longer(Alternative 2) would be greater. Alternative 2 follows an existing road through the Langeberge andhence should not require the construction of a maintenance track.

HeritageThe proposed route alternatives are comparable in terms of their potential impacts on heritageresources.

Social Impact The majority of the negative social impacts are anticipated to respond to mitigation. The possible negative impacts on the visual environment and sense of place remain of

concern. Safety and security concerns, and possible health related impacts should be pro-actively

addressed. As indicated in the initial SIA, the alignment should avoid dwellings, tourist establishments,

sensitive receptors and mining activities. The proposed transmission line with the deviation section can be implemented. It must,

however, be ensured that the mitigation measures proposed in the initial SIA and as stated inthis document are strictly implemented.

Fauna and FloraThe results reveal that Alternative 1 & 2 are very similar as far as site specific results are concerned.The results of the vegetation and terrestrial animal assessment reveal that Alternative 1 and 2 areacceptable routes

Visual ImpactThe proposed alternative 2 would break new ground whilst the first alternative succeeds in complying


62

with the principle of consolidating linear infrastructure. The second alternative would contribute to thespreading of both the primary and secondary visual impacts.

Alternative C

No-go alternative (compulsory) The environmental status-quo will remain the same in the No-go scenario The No-go option will have a negative impact on the electricity supply to the Northern Cape

Region and will impact negatively on economic growth.


63

SECTION E: RECOMMENDATIONS OF PRACTITIONER

Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached heretosufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of theenvironmental assessment practitioner)?

YES√ NO

If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA processbefore a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment).

If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should beconsidered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respectof the application.See mitigation measures in impacts tables (Appendix F) and EMPr

Is an EMPr attached? YES√ NOThe EMPr must be attached as Appendix G.

The details of the EAP who compiled the BAR and the expertise of the EAP to perform the BasicAssessment process must be included as Appendix H.

If any specialist reports were used during the compilation of this BAR, please attach the declaration ofinterest for each specialist in Appendix I.

Any other information relevant to this application and not previously included must be attached inAppendix J.

___________D W Prinsloo___________________NAME OF EAP

________________________________________ ___19 June 2013______________SIGNATURE OF EAP DATE


64

SECTION F: APPENDICES


65

Appendix A: Maps


66

Appendix B: Photographs


67

Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)


68

Appendix D: Specialist reports (including terms of reference)


69

Appendix D 1: Avifauna


70

Appendix D 2: Fauna & Flora


71

Appendix D 3: Geotechnical


72

Appendix D 4: Heritage


73

Appendix D 5: Social


74

Appendix D 5: Visual


75

Appendix E: Public Participation


76

Appendix F: Impact Assessment


77

Appendix G: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)


78

Appendix H: Details of EAP and expertise


79

Appendix I: Specialist’s declaration of interest


80

Appendix J: Additional Information


81

FERRUM SUBSTATION TO GARONA SUBSTATION 400kV OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE

Documents

Transcript of FERRUM SUBSTATION TO GARONA SUBSTATION 400kV OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE