Federal Aviation Administration 1 TERPS Airport Obstruction Standards Committee (AOSC) AC...

Federal AviationAdministration 1

TERPS

Airport Obstruction Standards Committee (AOSC)

AC 150/5300-13 Change 9 and 10

Airport and Aeronautical SurveysPresentation to:Penn State Airports Conference, Hershey, PA.

Name:Timothy Roe

Date: 03/01/2006


Overview• Introduction (Obligatory Joke)

• AOSC Overview

• TERPS Change 9 and 10 to AC 150/5300-13

• Airport and Aeronautical Surveys

• Questions


Airport Obstructions Standards Committee (AOSC)

• Chartered May 2003

• The AOSC works across allworks across all FAA lines of business to transform outdated, to transform outdated, inconsistent obstruction standards, inconsistent obstruction standards, and practicesand practices to future policy that optimally balancesbalances operational safety, effectiveness, and economic benefit


AOSC Steering Group

• Reports to Deputy Administrator, ADA-1

• AOSC Steering Group Membership• Ruth Leverenz, ARC-1• Kate Lang, ARP-1 (Acting)• Russ Chew, ATO-1• Nick Sabatini, AVS-1


AOSC Web Site - http://www.aosc.faa.gov/

Airports RepRobert Bonanni

(AAS-100)

ATO Rep.Jesse Gaines

(Terminal Safety and Operations

Support)


AOSC Decision Documents

• DD01 - POFA and Runway Separation, dated 12/18/03DD01 - POFA and Runway Separation, dated 12/18/03

• DD02 - 40:1 Departure Surface, dated 9/13/04DD02 - 40:1 Departure Surface, dated 9/13/04

• DD03 - Atlanta End-Around Taxiway (Departure Only), dated 7/12/04

• DD04 - Runway/Parallel Taxiway Separation Standards , DD04 - Runway/Parallel Taxiway Separation Standards ,

dated 3/21/05dated 3/21/05

• DD05 - Airport Traffic Control Tower Interim Siting Guidance, dated 6/08/05

• DD06 - DFW End-Around Taxiway(Departure Only), dated 6/08/05


Current AOSC Efforts

•End-Around Taxiways•National Standards

• Departure Case• Arrival Case?

• Updating Safety Assessment Toolset• Airport Surveying-GIS Program • NLA – TERPS Requirements Document• 62.5:1 One Engine Inoperable (OEI) guidance


• POFA was renamed POFZ and included in Chg 8 to AC 150/5300-13 sent out September 30th, 2004. Same surface different name

• New POFZ marking/signage standards became effective December 2004. (Standard ILS Signs)

• FAA issued guidance for controllers to ensure POFZ is clear when weather is below 250 feet and ¾ mile and an aircraft is within 2 nautical miles final.

• POFZ is required no later than

January 2007January 2007

Decision Document 01Decision Document 01POFA and Runway POFA and Runway

SeparationSeparation


Decision Document #02 40:1 Departure Surface

• Decision document #02 committed the Agency to…

• Establish a consistent 40:1 OCS standard

• Provide departure obstacle information to aircraft operators for all 40:1 penetrations

• Revise both the internal coordination procedures and the policy criteria governing the circularization process in the OE/AAA program.


Change 9 to AC 150/5300-13

• Added a New Departure Surface :

• Consistent with TERPS and FAR guidance• Added to Appendix 2 • Applicable to all instrument runways with departure

procedures

• Added a New One Engine In-Operable(OEI) Survey Surface:

• Applicable at all runway ends used for air carrier departures• Surface to be included in the ALP and made available to all air

carriers at the airport• Does not take effect until January 1,2008Does not take effect until January 1,2008


AC 150/5300-13 Change 10 • ARP will include 40:1 OCS clarification in change 10 of AC 150/5300-13

Departure Surfaces For Designated Runways

• The applicability of the surface table A2-1 is dependant on the designation of primary runway(s) for departure. The Airport Sponsor The Airport Sponsor through ARP to the RAPTthrough ARP to the RAPT, will identify runway end(s) intended identify runway end(s) intended primarily for instrument departures.primarily for instrument departures. The determination of primary runway(s) for departure does not prohibit or negate the use of other runways . It only identifies the applicability of the A2-1 surface to the runway end(s).


40:1 Departure Surface

STARTS ATDEPARTURE ENDOF RUNWAY (DER)

15°

15°

500 FEET

1,000 FEET

TERPS (40:1)

10,200 FEET

SURFACE STARTSAT END OF CLEARWAY IF ONE IS INPLACE

LC

3,233 FEET

3,233 FEET

10,200 FEET


OEI Departure Surface

OIS (62.5:1)

OIS (62.5:1)STARTS ATDEPARTURE ENDOF RUNWAY (DER)

600± FEET

15°

OIS SURFACESTARTS AT END OF CLEAR WAYIF ONE IS IN PLACE

6,000 FEETOBSTACLE IDENTIFICATION

SURFACE (OIS)62.5:1

6,000 FEET15°

50,000 FEET

300± FEET

300± FEET

CL


Action Plan • ARP:

• Develop guidance consistent with this decision

• ATO:• Work with airports to develop operational guidance using existing

infrastructure (e.g., outer taxiways) • AVS:

• Provide guidance to supercede TIL 02-005A and emphasize that draft TIL 03-040 has been withdrawn

• Provide guidance to National Flight Procedures Group exempting the application of the above guidance during the bi-annual review process for existing procedures

• Update and refine the Safety Assessment Toolset • Review standards based on updated toolset


Decision Document 04 Runway to Parallel Taxiway Separation

• In support of Agency’s commitment to ensure safe precision approach and landing operations, policy clarification is needed, and the Airports Design A/C, TERPS and other guidance must be consistentguidance must be consistent (i.e., taxiing, parked and holding aircraft are obstacles)


Construction of New Runways/Parallel Taxiways

• All CAT I operations• 400 ft separation(500 ft for Group VI)

• CAT II/III Operations

• Groups I-IV aircraft - 400 ft separation• Group V aircraft - 500 ft separation*• Group VI aircraft - 550 ft separation*

*if Airport elects to proceed with construction


Existing Infrastructure

• The Agency will work with airports to develop operational guidance where compliance can be achieved utilizing existing infrastructure without significant impact on airport efficiency.

• Note that Airport improvement projects where a

Draft Environmental Impact Statement was issued prior to approval of AOSC DD01 on December 18, 2003 will be treated as existing infrastructure.


Airport Surveying-GIS Program Overview

FAA Survey Initiative

• LPV (WAAS)

• Questions


FAA Survey Initiative Airport Surveying-GIS Program (e-ALP)


Airport Surveying – GIS Program Purpose

• Reduce the FAA’s use of NGS for field surveys and Transition the Survey to Private Contractors

• Allow surveys conducted by commercial enterprises/surveyors to use

Federal Grants as well as other State & Local Aviation Resources.

• Standardize the Survey Process in a Cost-Effective and Expedited Manner

• Increase the Number of Surveys Conducted Annually

• Provide data for a standard GIS database capable of producing Digital ALPs and OC Drawings.


Airport Surveying-GIS Program Objectives

• Create a Standardized Process for Conducting Aeronautical Surveys – Advisory Circulars

• Create an Airport Geographic Information (GIS) System Website and Database

• Develop Technical Guidance, Instructions and Templates on contracting out and/or conducting Aeronautical Surveys for Airport Sponsors

• Develop Tools for Airports and Surveyors to Capture and Provide Survey Data in Digital Form (ADCAT Program)

• Consolidate all FAA Airport Data Requirements into a New Standard for Airport Layout Data to support FAA and Industry


Aeronautical Surveys

AirportSponsorRequest

AIPGrant

3rd PartySurvey

Data LoggerChecks andFormats Data

AVNNACO

DataAcceptable NGS

Validation

DataNot Acceptable

ADCAT

GISDatabase

E-NASR


LPV Implementation

• FAA Program Goals• 150 approaches to be implemented in FY-05, 300

approaches in FY 06, FY-07, FY-08• WAAS Office funds most surveys in FY-05, FY-06• ARP Survey Program transitions in FY-07 to fund

surveys through third parties.

• Selection of R/W Ends• Led by ATO and ARP • Input from Airport Sponsors, and user groups


FY 07 and Beyond• Runway ends surveyed by airport/contractor

or NGS• Survey completed with Federal, state, and local funds

at eligible airports

• Selection of R/W Ends• Led by ARP and ATO• Airport sponsor-driven process• Input from WAAS Office, AVN, and AOPA


FY 07 LPV Implementation

• Criteria Used• Established by ARP with input from WAAS Office• Requests from airport sponsor• Guidance in Appendix 16 of AC 150/5300-13• Shown on ALP• Availability of FY 06/07 funding to implement• Environmental issues addressed• Non-NPIAS airports not considered

• Submitted to RAPT (Regional Airspace and Procedures Team), including Airports Division


New Process: FY07 & Beyond

Survey Request

Grant Application

Schedule Survey

Conduct Survey

Data Validation

Obstruction Chart

AVNApproach Procedure

National Geodetic SurveyAviation Systems Standards

AIP Grant Award

Airports GISData

NGS

WAASProgram

Goals

WAASProgram

Goals

-Processes controlled by FAA -Processes controlled by NGS -Processes controlled by the Airport

Airport Planning Process

Airport Planning Process

Note: State grants, PFC, andlocal funding are also possible

This is th

e

eALP Project

This is th

e

eALP Project


Robert Bonanni, P.E.

Office of Airports – Airport Engineering (AAS-100)

202.267.8761

[email protected]

Timothy Roe

Innovative Solutions International Inc.

supporting the

Office of Airports - Airport Engineering (AAS-100)

202-267-8785

[email protected]

? Questions ?

Federal Aviation Administration 1 TERPS Airport Obstruction Standards Committee (AOSC) AC...

Documents

Transcript of Federal Aviation Administration 1 TERPS Airport Obstruction Standards Committee (AOSC) AC...