Funding our Schools: February 2013 Levies Community Engagement Meetings September 20, 24, 27, 2012
February 2010 – Seattle Public School Levies October 20, 2009.
-
Upload
isis-wortley -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of February 2010 – Seattle Public School Levies October 20, 2009.
February 2010 – Seattle Public School Levies
October 20, 2009
State Education Funding Crises
State Biennial budgets for K-12 are a moving target: 2007- 09 Budget: Plus $1.2 Billion for K-12 2009-11 Budget: Minus $1.4 Billion for K-12 Cuts for K-12 included:
Compensation – no COLA, delayed pensions I-728 – Student Achievement/Small Classroom
size Professional Development WASL Efficiencies and more
2
WA Per-Student Funding Compared to US Average - WA now 45th
Current Ranking (Jan. 2009) by Ed Week Per pupil, adjusted for
regional cost differences: WA RANKS #45
3
Seattle School Annual Revenue Sources
4
Seattle – Mission Critical Protect the schools budget from further cuts
in this downturn economy PASS THE LEVIES -- #1 Priority
Operations Levy accounts for 24% of SPS budget Building, Technology & Academics (BTA) is 100% of
the capital improvement budget GET OUT THE VOTE – only 30% of parents vote
5
The children of Seattle need a safe, nurturing and positive classroom experience and building
environment – levies provide this.Levies are not new taxes but renewals.
Seattle – Mission Critical Reject tax lids and restraints that affect Basic Ed -- Tim
Eyman’s Initiative 1033 Reduces State General Fund revenues by an estimated $5.9 billion by
2015 -Cuts to education, social, health and environmental services 41% of the General Fund goes to K-12 -- that’s $2.4 billion – on top of
the $1.4 billion that was just slashed Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management
Vote “NO” endorsed by: Washington State PTA, Seattle Council PTA, Schools First Board, League of
Education Voters, AARP, League of Women Voters, Seattle School Board Directors and 210+ other organizations.
More info: No campaign: www.no1033.com Yes campaign: www.permanet-offense.org
6
School Funding Election Cycle
1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
OperatingLevy
X X X X X
CapitalLevy – BuildingExcellence(BEX)
X X X
Capital Levy –Buildings,Tech. &Academics(BTA)
X X X
7
Proposed 2010 3-Year Operations Levy
2011 $140.3 M
2012 $147.4 M
2013 $160.4 M
Total $448.1 Million
8
Renewal of Operating Levy:24% of total SPS budget Teachers, which also include:
6th period in middle and high school, and foreign
language not state funded
Textbooks and classroom supplies
Student activities: Sports, music, drama
Counselors, librarians
Bilingual and special education services
Transportation, Utilities, Custodial support
Technology & Security support
9
Proposed 2010 6-Year Capital Levy (BTA III)
Potential levy levels: $270 Million
Pays for hundreds of building,
technology and academic projects all across the district and to implement the new assignment plan. Pays for 100% of capital improvements.
10
BTA III – School Board Guidance and Principles Align projects with the future Building Excellence IV (BEX
IV) Capital Levy and the Facilities Master Plan, Use the Facilities Condition Index (MENG report), Align with the New Student Assignment Plan, Capacity
Management and School Consolidation, Make progress in managing the maintenance backlog of
repairs, Create a category of energy efficient, sustainable projects Use an inclusive process which included early school
surveys and prioritized rankings utilizing cross departmental teams
Projects that can be completed within the 6 year life of the levy.
11
12121212
Summary: $270 million BTA Levy
Buildings 42% $ 113 million Technology 13% $ 34.9 million Academics 35% $ 94.1 million Construction
Inflation* 10% $ 27.2 million Total: $ 269.3 million
12* Calculated at 4% per year for 6 years
13
BTA III – Building Component42%* of Total BTA III Levy: $113,031,765
Major Preventative Maintenance
Waterline Replacement (13)**
Replace Roofs/Seismic Diaphragm (17)
Communication/Security Systems (3)
Exterior Wall Repair (3)
Fire Suppression – Sprinklers (11)
Electrical Services (4)
* Based on $252 million BTA Levy, **Number of projects/schools
m= Millions
$ 18m$ 4m
$ 116.4m
$ 236,000
$ 84,000$ 10.7m
$849,000
14
BTA III – Building Component (cont.)42%* of Total BTA III Levy:$113,031,765
Exterior Window Repair (1)**
Seismic/Unreinforced Masonry (7)Heat Ventilation Cooling Systems (8)Energy Efficiency & Green Projects (6)Capital Program Costs (BEX IV Planning)
Nutritional Services EquipMaintenance Grounds & Custodial Equipment* Based on $270 million BTA Levy, **Number of projects/schools
m= Millions
$ 219,000
$ 17.9 m
$ 13.8m
$ 21.6m
$ 5.2m
$2m
$2m
15
Opening Buildings Proposed Building Timing
Sand Point 2010
Old Hay (students at Lincoln in 2010-11) 2011
Viewlands 2011
Rainier View 2011
McDonald (students at Lincoln in 2010-11) 2012
16
BTA III — Technology Component13%* of Total BTA III Levy: $34,885,000
Students and TeachersStudent information systems; instructional technology; library services; data warehouse;STEM computer hardware and technology
Schools and SystemsWeb upgrades to improve communication with all constituents; electronic records management; support business services; IT Disaster Recovery
Technology Infrastructure for Schools and DistrictReplace aging PCs, projectors; sound systems and infrastructure; increase network bandwidth*Based on $270 million BTA Levy
$ 10,865,500
$ 8,800,000
$ 15,220,000
BTA III – Academics Component 35%* of the Total BTA III Levy: $94,110,630
STEM at ClevelandScience, Technology, Engineering and Math school: capital work to support implementation
Meany building upgradeTo support changes in use
Capacity Planning & ManagementOpen buildings to support enrollment growth in specific geographic areas
Athletics: Fields, Turf, Lighting Routine replacements and increased lightingefficiencies at 12 sites
Skills Center
Future Program Moves & Portables*Based on $270 million BTA levy
$ 1.6m
$ 5m
$48.1m
$19.2m
$2m
$2.4m
17
BTA III – Academics Component (cont.)
35%* of the Total BTA III Levy: $94,110,630
MAP AssessmentMeasures of Academic Progress:Computer labs, test licenses
Special EducationBuilding modifications to support changes inservice delivery at all levels
Core 24 Grad RequirementsAdd science/computer labs at all high schools Early Learning ClassroomsModifications to support preschool atfour Title I Schools
*Based on $270 million BTA levy
$ 4.3m
$ 4.8m
$ 3.5m
$ 3.2m
18
Subject WA
State
Min for 4 year
College
Meaningful HS Diploma CORE 24
English 3 4 4
Math 2 3* 3
Science 2 3 (2 lab) 3 (2 lab)
Social Studies 2.5 3 3
World Lang 0 2 2
Arts 1 1 2
Health/Fitness 2 2
OC ED 1 3
Electives 5.5 2
Total 19 24
Current and Proposed State Graduation Requirements
Seattle requires 20 credits for graduation 19
2009 Total Levy Rates
20
February Levies Schedule Community meetings Sept. 22, 24, 28 Board Work session October 7, 2009 Levy resolutions - introduction November 4, 2009 Public hearing November 12, 2009 Levy resolutions – review November 18, 2009 Levy resolutions – adoption December 2, 2009 Last day or mail & online voter
registration January 11, 2010 Ballots mailed January 22, 2010 Last day for in-person
registration February 1, 2010 Levy election February 9, 2010
21
February Levies Next Steps
For more information go to: www.SchoolsFirstSeattle.org www.SeattleSchools.org
Have every PTA donate to the campaign $500 - $5000 or what your PTA can afford
Minimum of 2% of your annual fundraising
Every school needs “Levy Captain” Dec. to Feb 9 -- short commitment Distribute signs, recruit for phone banks, distribute information
Only 30% of parents vote – we need to reach more VOTERS Contact your PTA Legislative Chair or SCPTA
[email protected] or 206-781-5566
Levy election February 9, 2010
22
APPENDIX
10%
53%19%
18%
Property Tax
Sales & Use
Bus. & Occ.
Misc
General Fund Revenue Sources
Misc. includes: Cigarette, estate, public utility taxes, etc., plus Timber and Lottery Revenues.
24
SCPTSA Resolution for a NO on Initiative 1033 A RESOLUTION of the Seattle Council PTSA General Membership, PTSA 6.15, Seattle ,
Washington against Initiative 1033. WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 would establish new limits on the growth in Washington State general
fund revenues, of which approximately 42 percent currently supports K-12 education; and WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 will reduce state revenue by an estimated $5.9 billion by 2015 (as
estimated by the Office of Financial Management), and thereby further erode K-12 funding by an estimated $2.4 billion in the State of Washington; and
WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 is on the ballot in a year when the Washington Legislature reduced funding for K-12 public schools by $1.5 billion, cuts that have negatively impacted our local schools, staff and students; and
WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 will lock in the current budget cuts for years and likely force further cuts to public services resulting in additional job losses, more hard times for Washington families and a longer delay before our economy recovers; and
WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 will likely prevent the State from making progress towards revamping the State’s K-12 education finance system by revising the way the State defines and pays for basic education; and
WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 would clearly hurt the State’s efforts to promote student learning, achievement and school accountability, and
WHEREAS, Initiative 1033 will undoubtedly have a devastating impact on K-12 education in our local community and in the State of Washington.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Seattle Council General Membership PTSA l shall join with the Washington State PTA, Washington Education Association, Seattle Council PTSA Board, Shoreline PTA General Membership, and others, in opposing the passage of Initiative 1033 and endorse a “No-Vote on I-1033”.
25
Promise of HB 2261
“Redefines basic education as the opportunity for students to graduate with a meaningful high school diploma. Prepared for college and/or a family-wage job”. Passed into law May 2009, to take effect by 2018
Create a “prototypical school” funding model Core 24 – This aligns high school requirements with college and
employer requirements. Increased instructional hours -- Six periods in middle and high
school. Roll-out, all-day Kindergarten and reduced class size K-3 Enhanced allocations for low income, bilingual and highly capable. Implementation by specific Council, Boards and Groups
Quality Educational Council (QEC), Funding Formulas Working Group (Directed by OFM with OSPI), State Board of Education (SBE), Professional Education Standards Board (PESB), OSPI to establish a K-12 Data Governance Group
26
27
Estimated Annual School Property Taxes Based on Various Assessed Home Values
Assumption:Operating - $448.1 M ; BTA III - $270.0 M, rev 10-20-09
Estimated Total Property TaxesAssessed Home
Value - 12/31/10 2011 2012 2013
$ 200,000 $ 411 $ 409 $ 420 $ 300,000 $ 616 $ 614 $ 630 $ 400,000 $ 822 $ 818 $ 840 $ 500,000 $ 1,027 $ 1,023 $ 1,050 $ 600,000 $ 1,233 $ 1,227 $ 1,260
28
Estimated Levy Amount per $1,000 Assessed Value – Based on $252m OLD info
Assumptions:• Operating - $448.1 M ; BTA III - $253.0 M• 2010 assessed value based on King County Assessment Office while 2011-2013 assessed values use growth rates projected by Community Attributes
2929
Capacity Management – Opening Buildings InformationBuilding Name
Project Total by Building
Year Closed
Proposed Functional Capacity 2015
Total Number of Teaching Stations
Sand Point $7,046,000 1988 225w/ptbls. 325
13W/ptbls. 17
Viewlands $11,098,000 2007 420 25
Old Hay $7,513,000 n/a 350 17
McDonald $14,980,000 1981 370 21
Rainier View $7,435,000 2007 305 19
2929
3030
Building Age 2008: Average age of buildings District wide
is 43 years old Over ½ of the District’s buildings were
constructed earlier than 1960 Average age of elementary, K-8 and middle
school existing buildings differ by cluster with north and northeast buildings significantly older than the average