Feature VBA Calculator Excel Tool Set 2

7/30/2019 Feature VBA Calculator Excel Tool Set 2

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/feature-vba-calculator-excel-tool-set-2 1/17

CS Core featu re VBA

Navigator

Copyright Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights reserved. This model isprovided for use together and in co-operation with Nokia SiemensNetworks. This model may not be presented or used with any thirdparty without the prior written permission from Nokia SiemensNetworks.

Disclaimer: Techno-economic business modeling is used to simulatea hypothetical business situation based on data generated fromvarious sources. Actual results in a real business environment maydiffer materially from results achieved by modeling. Nokia SiemensNetworks makes no representation as to the accuracy of the dataused and disclaims any and all liability for the actual results achieved.



2G Customer base 3,000,000

MO 2G Calls during BH /subscriber 1.50 calls / hour simultaneous

Average (successfull) call length [sec] 120 calls

MGW internal call ratio 20% => 900,000 30,0002G - 2G Call ratio in IP Backbone 50% => 2,250,000 75,000

2G - PSTN/PLMN Call ratio in IP Backbone 30% => 1,350,000 45,000

Total 100% => 4,500,000 150,000

Bandwith per call without TrFO [kbps] 84.80 => 10,176,000

Bandwith per call with TrFO [kbps] 33.20 => 3,984,000

Bandwith saving per call with TrFO [kbps] 51.60 =>

Total bandwith saving in IP-Backbone: 6,047 Mbps = 60.8%

* => Effects on Backbone troughput

900,000

1,125,000

1,350,000

MGW M

intra in2G (A)

IP/MPLS

BICC

PSTN/PLMN

Simultaneous 2G OriginatedCalls per Access type

MGW



Codec Bandwith need with headers

EFR 33.2 kbps

G.711 20ms 84.8 kbps

G.711 5ms 147.2 kbps

Less

1,125,000W

tra 2G (A)BICC



3G Customer base 600,000



MGW internal call ratio 10% => 90,000 3,000

3G - 3G Call ratio in IP Backbone 30% => 270,000 9,0003G - 2G Call ratio iin IP Backbone 30% => 270,000 9,000

3G - PSTN/PLMN Call ratio in IP Backbone 30% => 270,000 9,000

Total 100% => 900,000 30,000

Bandwith per call without TrFO [kbps] 84.80 => 2,289,600

Bandwith per call with TrFO [kbps] 33.20 => 896,400


Total bandwith saving in IP-Backbone: 1,361 Mbps = 60.8%


15,000 27,000

4,500

9,000

MGW M

intra int

3G (Iu-cs)

2G (A)

IP/MPLS

BICC

PSTN/PLMN


MGW



Example Example

TCU's without TCU's with

TrFO (G.711) TrFO (AMR)

24 16

141 47 * Codec Bandwith need with headers141 94 * AMR 4.75 25.6 kbps

141 94 * AMR 12.2 33.2 kbps

447 251 G.711 20ms 84.8 kbps

44% less G.711 5ms 147.2 kbps

60.8% Less

Less

15,000

4,500W

ra

3G (Iu-cs)

2G (A)BICC



Multipoint A or Iu interface

Common network info

Subscriber base

Network growth

Ratio of commuters

CS Core inputs

Cost of CS core HW/sub

Cost of CS core SW/sub

Capacity of one CS core NE

Cost of site/sqrM for CS Core

sqrM/ CS core element

BSC/RNC inputsCost of BSC/RNC HW/sub

Cost of BSC/RNC SW/sub

Capacity of one BSC/RNC

Cost of site/sqrM for BSC/RNC

sqrM/ BSC/RNC

Number of BSC/RNC

Feature investment

CS core feature

BSC/RNC feature

Without Multipoint

CS Core inputsNumber of NE

Loading of NE

Site investment

Site cost CS core (Cummulative)

System investment

Cost of system (Cummulative)

BSC/RNC inputs

Utilasition ratio of BSC/RNC

Number of BSS/RNC

Site investment

Site cost for BSC/RNC (Cummulative)

System investment

Cost of BSC/RNC system (Cummulative)Total system cost

Yearly investment

Cummulative investment

With Multipoint

CS Core inputs

Number of NE

Loading of NE

Site investment



Site cost for CS core (Cummulative)

System investment

Cost of system (Cummulative)

SW investment

CS Core feature cost (Cummulative)

BSC/RNC inputs

Utilasition ratio of BSC/RNC

Number of BSS/RNC

Site investment

Site cost for BSC/RNC (Cummulative)

System investment

Cost of BSC/RNC system (Cummulative)

SW investment

BSC/RNC feature cost (Cummulative)

Total system cost

Yearly investment

Cummulative investment

Comparison

W/O Multipoint

With Multipoint

Difference

0 €

20,000,000 €

40,000,000 €

60,000,000 €

80,000,000 €

100,000,000 €

120,000,000 €

140,000,000 €

160,000,000 €

180,000,000 €

2007



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

5,000,000 5,100,000 5,355,000 5,462,100 5,680,584 # of Subs

2% 5% 2% 4% 6% Growth rati

35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Ration of s

5.00 € 5.00 € 5.00 € 5.00 € 5.00 €

9.00 € 9.00 € 9.00 € 9.00 € 9.00 €

2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Max VLR c

2,500.00 € 2,500.00 € 2,500.00 € 2,500.00 € 2,500.00 €

15 15 15 15 15 Needed flo

2.00 € 2.00 € 2.00 € 2.00 € 2.00 €

6.00 € 6.00 € 6.00 € 6.00 € 6.00 €

600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Max numb

1,750.00 € 1,750.00 € 1,750.00 € 1,750.00 € 1,750.00 €

8 8 8 8 8 Needed flo

9 9 9 10 10 Max loadin

0.30 €

0.30 €

2007 2008 2009 2010 20114 4 4 4 5 Dependent

75% 75% 75% 75% 75% Max loadin

150,000 € 0 € 0 € 0 € 37,500 €

150,000 € 150,000 € 150,000 € 150,000 € 187,500 €

95,000,000 € 900,000 € 2,295,000 € 963,900 € 14,466,356 €

95,000,000 € 95,900,000 € 98,195,000 € 99,158,900 € 113,625,256 €

100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

9 9 9 10 10

126,000 € 0 € 0 € 14,000 € 0 €

126,000 € 126,000 € 126,000 € 140,000 € 140,000 €

43,200,000 € 0 € 0 € 4,800,000 € 0 €

43,200,000 € 43,200,000 € 43,200,000 € 48,000,000 € 48,000,000 €

138,476,000 € 900,000 € 2,295,000 € 5,777,900 € 14,503,856 €

138,476,000 € 139,376,000 € 141,671,000 € 147,448,900 € 161,952,756 €

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

3 3 3 3 3

90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Max loadin

112,500 € 0 € 0 € 0 € 0 €



112,500 € 112,500 € 112,500 € 112,500 € 112,500 €

82,500,000 € 900,000 € 2,295,000 € 963,900 € 1,966,356 €

82,500,000 € 83,400,000 € 85,695,000 € 86,658,900 € 88,625,256 €

1,500,000 € 30,000 € 76,500 € 32,130 € 65,545 €

1,500,000 € 1,530,000 € 1,606,500 € 1,638,630 € 1,704,175 €

65% 65% 65% 65% 65%

14 14 14 15 15

193,846 € 0 € 0 € 21,538 € 0 €

193,846 € 193,846 € 193,846 € 215,385 € 215,385 €

49,015,385 € 0 € 0 € 5,446,154 € 0 €

49,015,385 € 49,015,385 € 49,015,385 € 54,461,538 € 54,461,538 €

1,500,000 € 30,000 € 76,500 € 32,130 € 65,545 €

1,500,000 € 1,530,000 € 1,606,500 € 1,638,630 € 1,704,175 €

134,821,731 € 960,000 € 2,448,000 € 6,495,852 € 2,097,446 €

134,821,731 € 135,781,731 € 138,229,731 € 144,725,583 € 146,823,029 €

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

138,476,000 € 139,376,000 € 141,671,000 € 147,448,900 € 161,952,756 €

134,821,731 € 135,781,731 € 138,229,731 € 144,725,583 € 146,823,029 €

3,654,269 € 3,594,269 € 3,441,269 € 2,723,317 € 15,129,727 €

2008 2009 2010 2011

Cost comparison

W/O Multipoint

With Multipoint



o

bscribers commuting between 2 points

MGW 2,2€/sub + MSS 0.8

apacity of one switching unit Needes 2 MGWs to reach 2Msubs

or space for NE For MSC serve us 15sqrM

r of subscriber a NE element can handle

or space for NE

g is 75% of total capacity

on commuter ratio

g is 75%

g is 90% due to smaller mobility management margin



Data Retention

Year

Network size

Network growth ratio

Commuter ratio

Number of commuters

Intersystem handovers/commuter/day

Number of ISHO/day

Amount of data for one ISHO w/o DR

Amount of data for one ISHO with DRCapacity of one signalling link

Number of network nodes



2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

5,000,000 5,250,000 5,512,500 5,788,125 6,077,531

5% 5% 5% 5%

45% 45% 45% 45% 45%

2,250,000 2,362,500 2,480,625 2,604,656 2,734,889

2 2 2 2 2

4,500,000 4,725,000 4,961,250 5,209,313 5,469,778



3G Customer base 450,000



MGW internal call ratio 33% => 222,750 5,569

3G - 3G Call ratio in IP Backbone 67% => 452,250 11,306Total 100% => 675,000 16,875

Bandwith per call without TrFO [kbps] 84.80 => 958,770

Bandwith per call with TrFO [kbps] 33.20 => 375,368


Total bandwith saving in IP-Backbone: 570 Mbps = 60.8%


8,438 #REF!

MGW M

intra int

3G (Iu-cs)

2G (A)

IP/MPLS

BICC

PSTN/PLMN


MGW



Example Example

TCU's without TCU's with

w/o WB AMR with WB AMR

44 30

177 59 * Codec Bandwith need with headers221 89 AMR 4.75 25.6 kbps

59.7% less AMR 12.2 33.2 kbps

G.711 20ms 84.8 kbps

60.8% Less G.711 5ms 147.2 kbps

Less

8,438

W

ra

3G (Iu-cs)

2G (A)BICC

Feature VBA Calculator Excel Tool Set 2

Documents

Transcript of Feature VBA Calculator Excel Tool Set 2