Feature-level Compensation & Control

30
Feature-level Compensation & Control FLCC Process Integration April 5, 2006 A UC Discovery Project

description

F LCC. Feature-level Compensation & Control. Process Integration April 5, 2006. A UC Discovery Project. Year 2 Milestones. Si/Ge-on-insulator and Strained Si-on-insulator Substrate Engineering (M28 YII.13) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Feature-level Compensation & Control

Page 1: Feature-level Compensation & Control

Feature-level Compensation & Control

FLCCProcess IntegrationApril 5, 2006

A UC Discovery Project

Page 2: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

2

FLCC

Year 2 MilestonesSi/Ge-on-insulator and Strained Si-on-insulator Substrate Engineering (M28

YII.13) Increase thermal robustness of GeOI by using nitrogen and ammonia plasma

for bonding. Use of pseudo-MOSFET structure to evaluate transferred layer electronic properties. Develop a thermal-mechanical model to predict transferred layer thickness and structural stability. Work with industrial sponsors to initiate SOI research.

Diffusion of oxygen in germanium (M29 YII.14) Determine the diffusion coefficient for the diffusion of oxygen in germanium,

including the temperature dependence and the activation energy of the diffusion. Investigate the effect of an SiO2 cap on the diffusion of Si in Ge. Initial experiments on interaction of fine patterns with diffusion.

Transient enhanced diffusion of B in Ge (Milestone added) Investigate the effect of ion implantation damage on the diffusion of B in Ge. Intermixing of germanium in SOI films (YII.15) Develop a process for selectively forming strained Si1-xGex-in-SOI by

intermixing Ge & Si

Page 3: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

3

FLCC

Year 3 MilestonesSi/Ge-on-insulator and Strained Si-on-insulator Substrate Engineering (DEV Y3.1)

Prototype GeOI MOSFET performance evaluation. Demonstrate GeSiOI layer transfer using GeSi epi wafers. Investigate interfacial quality with high-K dielectric as buried insulator.

Effect of surface on diffusion in germanium (DEV Y3.2)

Utilize the test mask for the growth of thermal oxide and thermal nitride on Ge to systematically study the effects of the surface layers on diffusion in Ge.

Effect of implantation damage on the diffusion of dopants in Ge (DEV Y3.3)

Study the effect of ion implantation, in particular, end of range damage on the diffusion of common dopants in Ge. Determine if ion implantation damages have any transient effect on diffusion in Ge.

Characterization of Si1-xGex formed with Ge/Si intermixing process (DEV Y3.4)

Characterize the resistance of boron-doped Si1-xGex-on-insulator formed by the Ge/Si intermixing process. Characterize metal-to-Si1-xGex-on-insulator contact resistance and explore ways of lowering this to below 10-8 -cm2.

Page 4: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

4

FLCC

Advanced Source/Drain Technology

FLCC Research Theme:• Low-resistance source/drain technology for thin-body FETs

– Si1-xGex source/drain to lower parasitic resistances

– Impact of dopant pile-up and strain on contact resistance

Nano-scale CMOS devices & technology• Materials & processes to improve performance and/or scalability of logic & memory ICs

Pankaj KalraTsu-Jae King

Source/drain design & process technology for nano-scale CMOS• Joined FLCC program in Year 2

Page 5: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

5

FLCC

Si1-xGex Si1-xGexSi1-xGex Si1-xGex

Silicon Substrate

Source Drain

SiO2

SOI

GateGate

Silicon Substrate

Source Drain

SiO2

SOI

GateGate

Si1-xGex in the S/D regions will be

needed for thin-body PMOSFETs to• enhance mobility via strain • lower parasitic resistance

– S/D series resistance– contact resistance

Motivation

compressive strain 30% Idsat increase

Intel’s 90nm CMOS TechnologySi1-xGex in PMOS S/D regions to enhance on-state drive current without increasing off-state leakage

T. Ghani et al., 2003 IEDM Technical Digest

Substrate

Gate

Source Drain

Substrate

Gate

Source DrainLeff

Nsub

Xj

LgTox

Planar Bulk-Si Structure Thin-Body Structure

So

urc

e

Dra

in

Gate 2Gate 2

Fin Width Wfin = TSi

Fin Height = Hfin = W

Gate Length = Lg

Current Flow

Gate 1Gate 1

So

urc

e

Dra

in

Gate 2Gate 2

Fin Width Wfin = TSi

Fin Height = Hfin = W

Gate Length = Lg

Current Flow

Gate 1Gate 1

MOSFETscaling to Lg < 10nm Double-Gate “FinFET”

Page 6: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

6

FLCC

Impact of Process Variations

Bulk-Si SRAMBeta-ratio = 1.5Mean=135mVSigma=16mV

FinFET SRAM6-T DG – 1-Fin Mean=175mVSigma=5mV

FinFET SRAM4-T w/ FeedbackMean=285mVSigma=6mV FinFET SRAM

6-T w/ FeedbackMean=300mVSigma=6.6mV

0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

SNM (V)

SN

M D

istr

ibu

tio

n D

en

sit

y

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

Mixed-mode & MC simulations:

FinFET variations are due to parameter variations 3Lg = 3TSi = 10%Lg

Bulk-Si MOSFET variations are due to random dopant fluctuations only

Comparison of SRAM SNM Distributions

Z. Guo et al., Int’l Symp. Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005

Page 7: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

7

FLCC

The Problem

• Contact Scaling– Due to reductions in active

area, silicide-to-Si contact resistance is now an issue

CONTACT AREA

Si

WPlugMSix

• High Rseries in p-channel thin-body FETs limits performance

TSi=10nm

F.-L. Yang et al., 2004 Symp. VLSI Technology

CMOS FinFET I-V Characteristics

Page 8: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

8

FLCC

Approaches to Lowering c

• Material engineering– Si1-xGex source/drain

• Fermi-level de-pinning by interface passivation

• Image-force barrier lowering

• Strain-induced B reduction

K. Uchida et al., 2004 IEDM

BendingApparatus:

metal pad

active area

metal pad

active area

Kelvin Test Structure(plan view)

N

m Bc

*4exp

4

aN

si

qB

Page 9: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

9

FLCC

Formation of Epitaxial Si1-xGex

• The conventional approach (epitaxial growth in a UHV-CVD tool) is difficult for ultra-thin body FETs Thin Si is etched away during the hydrogen pre-bake step!

• An alternative approach is to selectively deposit Ge by conventional LPCVD, then diffuse it into Si– GeH4 gas, 340oC, 300mT

high process throughput

Ge Source Ge Drain

TSi = 3 nm

Gate

SiO2Si

XTEM of UTB MOSFET w/ raised Ge S/D

Ge Source Ge Drain

TSi = 3 nm

Gate

SiO2Si

XTEM of UTB MOSFET w/ raised Ge S/D

GeGe

Silicon Substrate

TBOX

TSiSiO2

SOIGeGeGeGe SiO2SiO2 GeGe

Silicon Substrate

TBOX

TSiSiO2

SOIGeGeGeGe SiO2SiO2

Test Structure to study the intermixing of Ge with Si

(cross-section view)

Page 10: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

10

FLCC

Milestones

Y2: Formation of Si1-xGex by intermixing Ge with Si– Process variables: anneal temperature, time, Ge doping

Y3: Characterization of Si1-xGex formed by intermixing– Parameters: Ge and B profiles, resistivity, contact resistance

– Investigation of approaches to lower c to <10-8 -cm2.

Y4: Fabrication of ultra-thin-body SOI PMOSFETs with Si1-xGex source/drain– Impact on hole mobility and parasitic resistance– Impact on variability (in on-state and off-state currents)

Page 11: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

11

FLCC

Diffusion Studies in Ge and SiGe

Chris Liao, Judy Liang, and Prof. Eugene E. Haller

University of California at Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

Page 12: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

12

FLCC

Motivation

Substrate

Gate

Source Drain

Substrate

Gate

Source DrainLeff

Nsub

Xj

LgTox

Courtesy of Pankaj Kalra and Prof. Tsu-Jae King

Planar Bulk-Si MOSFET Structure

• SiGe and Ge are utilized in current and new generations of electronic devices to enhance performance

• Due to aggressive scaling of MOSFET, precise dopants profile control is crucial– Xj < 10 nm by 2008*– Extension lateral abruptness < 3

nm/decade by 2008*

• Advanced modeling and control of diffusion requires an improved basic understanding of diffusion processes in SiGe and Ge

*International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), 2005

Page 13: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

13

FLCC

Current Milestones

• Year 3 Milestone (2006): Investigate transient enhanced diffusion (TED) effects in Ge

– Determine the temperature dependent equilibrium diffusivity of B in Ge (in progress)

– Study the effect of ion implantation damage on B diffusion in Ge (in progress)

Page 14: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

14

FLCC

The Problems

• Equilibrium diffusion and non-equilibrium diffusion effects are not well understood in Ge and SiGe

• Large discrepancies of diffusivity values of common dopants in Ge exist in the literature

• Non-equilibrium defect concentrations have been shown to enhance (or retard) dopant diffusion in Si

• Non-equilibrium transient effects on diffusion in Ge and SiGe are in progress

Page 15: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

15

FLCC

Equilibrium Diffusion in Ge

• Diffusion in Ge is believed to be mostly vacancy-mediated (contrary to Si, where both vacancies and interstitials are involved)

• Interstitials and their effects in Ge have not been observed experimentally

Vacancy mechanism

Page 16: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

16

FLCC

Contribution of Interstitial-Assisted Mechanism

• According to theory, for diffusion via the vacancy mechanism, the activation energy for impurity diffusion should be smaller than that for self-diffusion*

• Experiments show for Boron in Ge:

• An interstitial-assisted mechanism may need to be considered***Hu. Phys. Status Solidi B 60, 595 (1973).**Uppal et al. JAP 96, 1376, (2004).***Fuchs et al. Phy. Rev. B. 51, 16817 (1995).

123 )3.065.4(exp1097.1

scm

Tk

eVD

BB

123 05.00.3exp102.1

scm

Tk

eVD

BGe

**

***

Page 17: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

17

FLCC

MBE-grown Boron Doped Multilayer Structure

Ge Substrate

B-doped layers

•B-doped multilayer structure is used to study equilibrium and non-equilibrium transient effects of B diffusion in Ge•Alternating layers of 100 nm Ge spacer and 10 nm B-doped layer •Grown by Dr. Stefan Ahlers and Prof. G. Abstreiter at the Walter-Schottky Institut, Munich

Page 18: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

18

FLCC

Preliminary SIMS Results

0 200 400 600 8001016

1017

1018

1019

1020

As grown SIMS: 900C 18 min with Ge imp SIMS: 900C 18 min without Ge imp

Con

cent

ratio

n (a

tom

s/cc

)

Depth (nm)

• Samples were annealed at 900°C for 18 min

• Sample with Ge implantation shows slightly enhanced diffusion

• However, effects of implantation damage are still inconclusive from the preliminary results

Page 19: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

19

FLCC

Future Milestones

Year 4 Milestone:

Self-diffusion in strained and relaxed isotopically enriched SiGe layers

Si substrate

SiGe graded buffer layer

100 nm nat. Si1-yGey

100 nm nat. Si1-yGey

200 nm 28Si1-x70Gex

• By varying x and y, compressive and tensile strains can be introduced

• This structure will be used to study effect of strain on Si and Ge self-diffusion in SiGe

Page 20: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

20

FLCC

GSR: Eric Liu

Faculty PI: Prof. Nathan Cheung

Department of EECSUC-Berkeley

Fabrication and characterization of GeOI

Page 21: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

21

FLCC

Motivations

High channel carrier mobility

Low metal contactresistance

High channel carrier mobility

Low metal contactresistance

GeOI p-MOS shows 3x mobility improvementNakahari et al, SSDM 2005

Ge

Si

•Ultra-short channel ballistic transport: initial velocity (“low field mobility”) is important

•Advantageous for low supply voltage

Page 22: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

22

FLCC

2005 milestones:• Increase thermal robustness of GeOI• Use of pseudo-MOSFET structure to evaluate

transferred layer electronic properties2006 milestones:• Prototype GeOI MOSFET performance evaluation• Demonstrate GeSiOI layer transfer using GeSi epi wafers• Investigate interfacial quality with high-k

dielectric as buried insulator

Achievements GeOI shows good thermal robustness at 550oC Model analysis of GeOI pseudo-MOSFET Forming gas annealing reduces fixed interface

charges Qf but generates interface traps Qit

Page 23: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

23

FLCC

2005-2006 Accomplishments

Ge donor wafer

Si Substrate

ImplantedHydrogen

GeOI

Pseudo MOSFET Characterization

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5a s - b on d ed

a nn e ale d

G e (1 0 0 ) f r a c tu r e e n e r g y 1 .8 4 J /m 2

N2/SiO

2,220°C

P la s m a -A s s is te d B o n d in g S tre n g th

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5a s - b on d ed

a nn e ale d

G e (1 0 0 ) f r a c tu r e e n e r g y 1 .8 4 J /m 2

N2/SiO

2,220°C

P la s m a -A s s is te d B o n d in g S tre n g th

G e (1 0 0 ) f r a c tu r e e n e r g y 1 .8 4 J /m 2

N2/SiO

2,220°C

P la s m a -A s s is te d B o n d in g S tre n g th

Eric Liu, UCB

The bonding interface charge < Qf ~1011/cm2, positive

Page 24: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

24

FLCC

GeOI after 550oC, 1 hr annealing

The imperfections found

( Density: <10/cm2 )After annealing at sequential T:360°C, 500°C, 550 °Cfor 1 hour, respectively. No color change, blistering,peeling, etc.

•GeOI shows good thermal robustness

Page 25: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

25

FLCC

Chemical-Mechanical-Polishing Set-up

Slurry

Platen

Pad

Wafer Fixture

CMP Set-Up: Lapping machine

Pad: (SBT Company)Polishing cloth Rayon-Fine 8” Diameter PSA P/N PRF08A-10Slurry: 0.2µm SiO2 particle mixed with KOH

Page 26: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

26

FLCC

GeOI surface smoothing with CMP

•GeOI surface can be smoothed down to RMS =0.3nm by CMP•GeOI substrates are ready for device fabrication

Page 27: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

27

FLCC

Pseudo-MOSFET : 4-probe-configuration

Heavily doped Si substrate

SiO2

I interface

Depletion region

I bulk

I surface

1234

p-Ge

xd

tGe-xd

VG

V2,3

Page 28: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

28

FLCC

Forming gas annealing effects

VFBext=-6V

VText=+1V

VFBext=0V

VText=+7V

•Forming gas improves hole accumulation at Ge/SiO2 interface

•Forming gas reduces electron inversion at Ge/SiO2 interface

Page 29: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

29

FLCC

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

2.70

2.75

2.80

2.85

2.90

2.95

3.00

3.05

3.10

GeOI sample#4: T~360C forming gas annealing for 5 hrs

VG(-30V to +30V), I1,4=10uA VG(+30V to -30V), I1,4=10uA VG(-30V to +30V), I1,4=20uA VG(+30V to -30V), I1,4=20uA

G, (

squa

re/O

hme)

VG,(V)

•Forming gas decreases Qit, 0 to 5x1011/cm2

Interface traps (Qit) behavior of forming gas anneal

ReducedMobile carriersDue to traps

Ideal VT=+20V

G

,(x1

0-4/�

)

VG, (V)

Page 30: Feature-level Compensation & Control

04/05/06 Process/Integration

30

FLCC

2006 Goals

• Qit reduction with surface encapsulation and optimized Temperature-Time cycles

• GeOI using Epi Ge wafer as donor wafer (with Yihwan Kim , AMAT)

• Prototype GeOI MOSFET with high-K dielectric and evaluation