Feasibility Study for rehabilitation and extension of the...

Sinisa Spegar, iC consulenten,Budapest, Thursday, 28 January 2016

Feasibility Study for rehabilitationand extension of the hydrometric stations

network on the Danube in Romania

28/01/2016 Programme co-financed by the EU through Cohesion Fund 1

Project details

Project NameFEASIBILITY STUDY FOR REHABILITATION AND EXTENSIONOF THE HYDROMETRIC STATION NETWORK ON THE DANUBE IN ROMANIA

Reference No.

SERVICE CONTRACT NO. 28/27.02.2015 The project is financed by the Sectoral Operational ProgrammeTransport (SOP-T) 2007-2013, Priority Axis 1, Major Field of Intervention 1.3.

Project Duration 10 Months

Project Start Date March 02nd , 2015

Project End Date December 31st , 2015

Project budget LEI 1.717.170

Jont Venture iC consulenten, INHGA, RFIDS


Facts


Deliverable Description Quantity Remark

Hydrological study

Location determined 64Max. number of parameters to be observed per location 9

Total number of parameters to be observed 357

Technical / Functional specification of equipment

Number of parameters to be observed directly 8

Number of parameters to be monitored indirectly 1

Number of sensor types proposed 7

Study for communication networkLocations visited 70Number of communication links tested 2Number of GSM providers tested 3

Geotechnical study Number of location examined 64Technical and functional alternative scenario Number of scenarios provided 3

DeliverablesThe Feasibility study

• Hydrological study; • Equipment study;• Study for communication network;• Geotechnical study;• Technical and functional alternative

scenarios



Hydrological studyExisting and extended Network


Hydrological studyProposed parameters

• Parameter 1 – Water level;• Parameter 2 – Water temperature;• Parameter 3 – Air temperature;• Parameter 4 – Discharge;• Parameter 5 – Ice appearance;• Parameter 6 – Sediment;• Parameter 7 - Wind direction and speed;• Parameter 8 – Visibility (air visibility);• Parameter 9 - Waves appearance and height.


Field Survey


Equipment studySystem architecture and sampling rates


Communication study

Main task:• to propose and describe technical solution for the network

segment that shall interconnect Field Segment and Central Segment

Outcomes:• Field survey and measurement• Bandwidth calculation• Proposed technical solution


Geotechnical studyEach location is described by:• geomorphological• geological • hydro - geological general

data• freezing depth• seismic zone.


Technical and functional alternative scenarios

Scenario 1:• Concrete block

foundation/pilot foundation for structures

Lsta

lp =

var

. (4,

00-6

,00)

m in

fct.

de a

mpla

sam

ent

501.

50

2.50

1.00

1.00

NAVIGATIONAL SIGNSEMNAL NAVIGATIE

1.40

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELPANOU FOTOVOLTAIC85

ALLUMINIUM POST Ø=20 cm; L=5.00 mSTALP ALUMINIU Ø=20 cm; L=5.00 m

FOUNDATION - REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK (2,50 x 2,00) m; h=1,50mFUNDATIE - BLOC BETON ARMAT (2,50 x 2,00) m; h=1,50 m

COTA TEREN NATURAL (CTN)

1:1AD. FUNDARE var.(0,90 - 1 .00)m IN FCT. DE AMPLASAMENT

LEAN CONCRETE g=5 cmBETON EGALIZARE g=5 cm

CRUSHED STONE LAYER g=20 cmSTRAT PIATRA SPART g=20 cm

35

CTN + 0,50 m

50

Lsta

lp =

var

. (4,

00-6

,00)

m in

fct.

de a

mpla

sam

ent

501.

50

2.00


PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELPANOU FOTOVOLTAIC



1:1

LEAN CONCRETE g=5 cmBETON EGALIZARE g=5 cm

CRUSHED STONE LAYER g=20 cmSTRAT PIATRA SPART g=20 cm

35

CTN + 0,50 m

50

BOX FOR EQUIPMENTS + BATTERIESCUTIE ECHIPAMENTE + BATERII

Nmax (p1%) + 0,50 m garda valHWL (p1%) + 0,50 m wave guard

Nmax (p1%) HWL (p1%)

3.00

50

VEDERE FRONTALA

SCARA/ SCALE 1:50

VEDERE LATERALA

SCARA/ SCALE 1:50

POST ANCHORING SYSTEM; ANCHRORS L=0.80 mSISTEM PRINDERE STALP - ANCORE L=0,80 m

REINFORCEMENT Ø12ARMATURA Ø12


Lsta

lp =

var

. (4,

00-6

,00)

m in

fct.

de a

mpla

sam

ent

501.

00

1.00

1.00

1.00


1.40

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELPANOU FOTOVOLTAIC85


FOUNDATION - REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK (1,00 x 1,00) m; h=1,00mFUNDATIE - BLOC BETON ARMAT (1,000 x 1,00) m; h=1,00 m



Hooped reinforcement/Freta Ø8pitch / cu pas de 15 cm

35

CTN + 0,50 m

50

Lsta

lp =

var

. (4,

00-6

,00)

m in

fct.

de a

mpla

sam

ent

50

0.05


PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELPANOU FOTOVOLTAIC



35

CTN + 0,50 m

50

BOX FOR EQUIPMENTS + BATTERIESCUTIE ECHIPAMENTE + BATERII

Nmax (p1%) + 0,50 m garda valHWL (p1%) + 0,50 m wave guard

Nmax (p1%) HWL (p1%)

3.00

50

VEDERE FRONTALA

SCARA/ SCALE 1:50

VEDERE LATERALA

SCARA/ SCALE 1:50

POST ANCHORING SYSTEM; ANCHRORS L=0.80 mSISTEM PRINDERE STALP - ANCORE L=0,80 m


CTN - 7 ,00 m

PIL

OT

FORA

T Ø

40 c

m, L

pilo

t=7,

00m

1.00


Hooped reinforcement/Freta Ø8pitch / cu pas de 15 cm


CTN - 7 ,00 m

PIL

OT

FORA

T Ø

40 c

m, L

pilo

t=7,

00m


Technical and functional alternative scenario

3030

302.

9060

30

5.70

2.25

2.25

6060

PASARELA METALICA DE ACCES; Lmed=12,00 m; l =0,80 m

REINF .CONCRET E COLUM NS Ø60 cm ; L=15.50 m; LOST METALLIC CASING L=11,00mCOLOANE DE B .A . Ø60 cm , L=15.50m , CU TUBULATURA METALICA PIERDUTA L=11,00m

5.70

M ET ALLIC PLAT FORM WIT H DECK T YPE FLOORINGPLATF ORMA M ET ALICA; PODEA TIP DECK

M ET ALLIC GUARD-RAIL; L=22mBALUSTRADA METALICA; L=22m

EQUIPM ENT BOX (1,00x1,00)m; h=1,50mCUT IE ECHIPAM ENT E (1,00x1,00)m; h=1,50 m

NAVIGAT IONAL SIGNSEM NAL NAVIGATIE

PHOTOVOLT AIC PANELPANOU F OT OVOLTAIC

±0.00

A

Nm ax (p1%) HWL (p1%)

-7.00

50

M ET ALLIC ST IF FENER; IPE300; L=3,90 mRIGIDIZ ARE METALICA; IPE300; L=3.90 m

4.50

3.90

±0,00 + 3,00m

REINF . CONCRETE GANGWAY SUPPORTANCASTRAM ENT DIN B.A. - SUPORT PASARELA

1.50

80

CTN

0.80

REINF .CONCRET E COLUM NS Ø60 cm ; L=15.50 m; LOST METALLIC CASING L=11,00mCOLOANE DE B .A . Ø60 cm , L=15.50m , CU TUBULATURA METALICA PIERDUTA L=11,00m

4 x M ET ALLIC ST IF FENER; IPE300; L=3,90 m4 x RIGIDIZ ARE METALICA; IPE300; L=3.90 m

2 x M ET ALLIC ST IF FENER; IPE300; L=5,70 m2 x RIGIDIZ ARE METALICA; IPE300; L=5.70 m

M ET ALLIC GANGWAY; Lm ed=12,00 m; l=0,80 mPASARELA METALICA; Lm ed=12,00 m ; l=0,80 m

M ET ALLIC PLAT FORM WIT H DECK T YPE FLOORINGPLATF ORMA M ET ALICA; PODEA TIP DECK

A

VEDERE LATERALA

SCARA/ SCALE 1:50

SECTIUNE A-A

SCARA/ SCALE 1:50

-2.50

30

C25/30

Scenario 2:• Structures with

foundation in water

Scenario 3:• Do nothing scenario


Cost-benefit analysis

Analysis of economic indicators for the two scenarios analyzed indicate that the rehabilitation and extension of a project hydrometric stations is strictly necessary and has a significant favorable impact whatever design is chosen for the foundation of structures serve for equipment installation.


Preliminary design

• Reqiurements for design• Structural calculations performed• Drawings and plans• BoQ, cost estimates and

work schedule



PROFIL TIP/SCARA/SCALE1:250

Nmax (p1%)

GEAMANDURA

±0.00

MAL APARAT

FUND APA

SENZORNmin (p1%)

CABLU

CTN - 7,00 m



PROFIL TIP/SCARA/SCALE1:250

Nmax (p1%)

GEAMANDURA

±0.00

MAL NEPROTEJAT

FUND APA

SENZORNmin (p1%)

CABLU


Documentation for permits

Identified relevant laws applicable to this Project and documentation prepared for obtaining of all permits and approvals for the Feasibility Study phase.


Conclusion

• Very long sector of the Danube to be covered (over 1000km)• Accessibility to locations is very poor, sometimes only from

the water• Complexity of efforts to be invested in network deployment• Supervision to be engaged


Follow up?

Sinisa Spegar, iC [email protected]


Thank you for your kind attention

Feasibility Study for rehabilitation and extension of the...

Documents

Transcript of Feasibility Study for rehabilitation and extension of the...