Faulkner University -

35
2/13/2011 1 BCJ 3310 - Corrections Faulkner University Instructor: Bill Filmore Cell: 334-797-9427 E-mail: [email protected] http://filmore.net/faulknerclass/index.html Chapter 1 The Corrections System Learning Objectives – Chpt. 1 1. Describe the range of purposes served by the corrections system. 2. Define the systems framework and explain why it is useful. 3. Name the various components of the corrections system today and describe their functions. 4. Identify at least five key issues facing corrections today. 5. Discuss what we can learn from the “great experiment of social control.”

Transcript of Faulkner University -

Page 1: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

1

BCJ 3310 - Corrections

Faulkner University

Instructor: Bill FilmoreCell: 334-797-9427E-mail: [email protected]://filmore.net/faulknerclass/index.html

Chapter 1The Corrections System

Learning Objectives – Chpt. 1

1. Describe the range of purposes served by thecorrections system.

2. Define the systems framework and explain why it isuseful.

3. Name the various components of the correctionssystem today and describe their functions.

4. Identify at least five key issues facing corrections today.

5. Discuss what we can learn from the “great experimentof social control.”

Page 2: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

2

Corrections Statistics

In 2008, U.S. imprisonment rate was 506 per100,000.

Over 3,200 people on death row.

14,000 serving life sentences.

Considering all forms of corrections, more than3% of all adults under some form of correctionalcontrol.

Little relationship between prison population andcrime rate.

Corrections Statistics

In 2009, over 7.2 million people were on probation, in jail or prison,or on parole at year end — 3.1% of all U.S. adult residents or 1 inevery 32 adults.The total correctional population declined (down0.7% or 48,800 offenders) during 2009, the first decline observed inthe population since the Bureau of Justice Statistics began reportingthis population in 1980.

At year end 2009 a total of 4,203,967 adult men and women were onprobation and 819,308 were on parole or mandatory conditionalrelease following a prison term.

State and federal prison authorities had jurisdiction over 1,613,740prisoners at yearend 2009: 1,405,622 under state jurisdiction and208,118 under federal jurisdiction.

Local jails held 760,400 adults awaiting trial or serving a sentence atmidyear 2009.

Adults Under Corrections

Page 3: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

3

Adult Correctional Population

% Adults – Correctional Supervision

Almost 5% ofthe adult malesand 1% of theadult femalesin the UnitedStates wereunder someform ofcorrectionalsupervision in1997.

Learning Objective 1

Learning Objective 1: Describe therange of purposes served by thecorrections system.

Page 4: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

4

Learning Objective 1

Purposes:

Protecting society by punishing people whobreak society’s rules.

Help define the limits of behavior soeveryone understands what is permissible.

Central purpose is to carry out the criminalsentence.

Learning Objective 2

Learning Objective 2: Define the systemsframework and explain why it is useful.

Learning Objective 2

A system is a complex whole consisting ofinterdependent parts whose operations are directedtoward common goals and influenced by theenvironment in which they function.

◦ Goals

◦ Interconnectedness

◦ Environment

◦ Feedback

◦ Complexity

Page 5: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

5

Learning Objective 2

Goals:

Punishment

Protection

When these two functions do notcorrespond, corrections faces goalconflict.

Learning Objective 2

Interconnectedness:

Corrections can be viewed as a series ofprocesses: Sentencing

Classification

Supervision

Programming

Revocation

Offenders pass through system in an assemblyline with return loops.

Learning Objective 2

Environment:

Outside forces/influences: Public opinion

Fiscal constraints

Law

Corrections has a reciprocal relationshipwith its environment.

Page 6: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

6

Learning Objective 2

Feedback:

Systems learn, grow, and improveaccording to feedback.

System has trouble obtaining usefulfeedback.

Correction system and environmentstend to over respond to failure butremain less aware of success.

Learning Objective 2

Complexity

All types of activities come underheading of corrections: Pretrial drug treatment

Electronically monitored homeconfinement

Work centers

Residential treatment programs

Learning Objective 3

Learning Objective 3: Name thevarious components of thecorrections system today anddescribe their functions.

Page 7: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

7

Learning Objective 3

Subunits:

Probation officers

Halfway houses

Prisons

Subunits vary in:

Size

Goals

Clientele

Organizational structure

Learning Objective 3

Federalism

◦ A system of government in which power andresponsibilities are divided between a nationalgovernment and state governments.

Most correctional activity takes place at statelevel, of all individuals in correctional system:

◦ 1% of individuals on probation at federal level.

◦ 10% on parole at federal level.

◦ 11% in prison at federal level.

Learning Objective 3

102 federal prisons, 1,719 state prisons

Prison

An institution for the incarceration of peopleconvicted of serious crimes, usually felonies.

Jail

A facility authorized to hold pretrial detaineesand sentenced misdemeanants for periodslonger than 48 hours.

Page 8: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

8

U.S. - Cost of Corrections

"Direct expenditure for each of the major criminal justice functions(police, corrections, judicial) has been increasing."

Costs of Corrections

In 2006, $68,747,203,000 was spenton corrections."The average annualoperating cost per state inmate in 2001was $22,650, or $62.05 per day;among facilities operated by the FederalBureau of Prisons, it was $22,632 perinmate, or $62.01 per day."

Alabama Crime Rate

Page 9: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

9

Alabama Incarceration Rate

Alabama Probationers

Alabama Parolees

Page 10: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

10

Alabama Corrections Costs

Alabama Prison Population

Learning Objective 4

Learning Objective 4: Identify atleast five key issues facingcorrections today.

Page 11: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

11

Learning Objective 4

Five key issues facing corrections today:

Conflicting goals.

Adequate funding.

Making the bureaucracy of correctional servicesmore effective.

Coordinating correctional activity acrossdifferent agencies.

Dealing with correctional uncertainty.

Learning Objective 4

Conflicting goals:

Rehabilitation/Punishment

Political ideology:Liberal

Conservative

Goals as vague generalities: “Protect the public”

“Rehabilitate offenders”

Learning Objective 4

Adequate funding:

Corrections paid for by taxrevenues:Vie for funding

Conflicts among branches andlevels of government.

Page 12: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

12

Learning Objective 4

Effective bureaucracy:

Street-level bureaucrats

Limited resources

Bureaucratic model guarantees thatservices are delivered only up to a pointand that goals are never fully achieved.

Learning Objective 4

• Coordinating correctional activity acrossdifferent agencies:

◦ Most correctional systems comprise severalloosely related organizations that arethemselves bureaucracies.

◦ Decision making dispersed.

◦ Great deal of policy is formallyinterconnected.

◦ One agency determines the workload of thenext.

Focus on Alabama…

Focus onCorrectional

PracticeCorrectional

Interconnectednessin Alabama

Page 20-21 atbottom

“Mass TransferCreates Crisis forAlabama Prisons”

Page 13: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

13

Learning Objective 4

Dealing with correctionaluncertainty:

Uncertain technologies

Uncertain correctionalstrategies

Learning Objective 4

Uncertain technologies:

Technology: A method of applying scientific knowledge to practical purposes in a

particular field.

Validity of approaches for treating offenders remain in doubt: Group therapy

Behavior modification

Anger management

Learning Objective 4

Uncertain correctional strategies:

Greater emphasis on secondary technologies: Design of a prison’s security apparatus

Computer-based offender-tracking system for probation

What happens to offenders?

Corrections gets its business from the courts but also fromitself.

Page 14: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

14

Learning Objective 5

Learning Objective 5: Discuss what wecan learn from the “great experiment ofsocial control.”

Learning Objective 5

Great Experiment – Increase in prisonpopulation:◦ Effects on crime: No likely effect

◦ Effects on society: Damage to families and communities

◦ Pursuit of justice: Have we become a more just society?

Chapter 2The Early History of CorrectionalThought and Practice

Page 15: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

15

Learning Objectives

1. Understand the major forms of punishment from theMiddle Ages to the American Revolution.

2. Discuss the Age of Reason and how it affected corrections.

3. Understand the contribution of Cesare Beccaria and theclassical school.

4. Understand the contribution of Jeremy Bentham and theutilitarians.

5. Discuss the work of John Howard and its influence oncorrectional reform.

Learning Objective 1

Learning objective 1: Understand themajor forms of punishment from theMiddle Ages to the AmericanRevolution.

Learning Objective 1

Earliest known comprehensive statements of prohibitedbehavior:

◦ Sumerian Law of Mesopotamia (3100 B.C.E)

◦The Sumerians were the first Mesopotamiancivilization.

◦They invented law, a system of resolving disputesbased on a code of rules and retribution by a centralauthority rather than relying on private retribution.TheCode of Hammurabi (Babylonian) is generally believedto be based on Sumerian law.

◦ Code of Hummurabi (1750 B.C.E) ….

Page 16: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

16

Early Sources of the Criminal Law Code of Hammurabi – an early set

of laws established by theBabylonian king Hammurabi, whoruled the ancient city from 1792 to1750 B.C. – first body of law tosurvive and be available for study.

Intended to establish property andother rights crucial to the continuedgrowth of Babylon as a significantcommercial center.

Emphasis on retribution – penalphilosophy – attempt to keep crueltywithin bounds – before code:revenge seeking victims punished

Early Roman Law

Early Roman Law derived fromtheTwelveTables – written circa450 B.C. which regulated family,religious, and economic life

Emperor Justinian I (A.D. 527-565) –The Justinian Code –contained elements of ourmodern civil and criminal law andinfluencedWestern legal thoughtthrough the Middle Ages

Laid the groundwork of European law.

Learning Objective 1

lex talionis:

◦ Law of retaliation; the principle that punishmentshould correspond in degree and kind to the offense.

Secular law:

◦ The law of the civil society as distinguished fromchurch law.

Wergild:

◦ “Man money”; money paid to relatives of a murderedperson or to the victim of a crime to compensatethem and to prevent a blood feud.

Page 17: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

17

Learning Objective 1

Main criminal punishments were penance and payment offines and restitution

◦ Lower-class offenders without money received physicalpunishment at the hands of masters

Church was the dominant social institution

Benefit of Clergy:

◦ The right to be tried in an ecclesiastical court, wherepunishments were less severe than those meted out by civilcourts, given the religious focus on penance and salvation.

Learning Objective 1

Five punishments common in Europe before the1800s besides fines:

Galley Slavery

Imprisonment

Transportation

Corporal Punishment

Death

Learning Objective 1

Galley Slavery

Forced rowing of large ships or galleys

Imprisonment

House of Correction Detention facility that combined the major elements of a

workhouse, poorhouse, and penal industry by both disciplininginmates and setting them to work.

Page 18: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

18

Learning Objective 1

Transportation

The practice of transplantingoffenders from the community toanother region or land, often a penalcolony.

Hulks: Abandoned ships the English converted

to hold convicts during a period ofprison crowding between 1776 and1790.

Learning Objective 1

Corporal Punishment and Death

Corporal Punishment Punishment inflicted on the

offender’s body with whips or otherdevices that cause pain.

Mutilation

o Removing hand or finger

o Slitting the nostrils

o Severing an ear

Branding

Hanging

Learning Objective 2

Learning objective 2: Discuss the Age of Reasonand how it affected corrections.

Page 19: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

19

Learning Objective 2

The Enlightenment, or the Age of Reason

The 1700s in England and France, when concepts ofliberalism, rationality, equality, and individualism dominatedsocial and political thinking. John Locke

Montesquieu

Voltaire

Learning Objective 2

The Enlightenment, or the Age of Reason

Advances in scientific thinking led to: Observation

Experimentation

Technological development

Sir Isaac Newton

Scientific Revolution Encouraged questioning of established institutions

Use of power of reason

Progress

Age of Reason

Impact on Corrections:

Classical school of criminology emerged: Rational link between gravity of crime and

severity of punishment

Limitations on power of governmentemphasized

Proposed system of graduated penalties

Page 20: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

20

Age of Reason

Major shift in penal thought and practice

Penal codes rewritten to emphasizeadaption of punishment to the offender

Correctional practices moved frominflicting pain to methods that would setthe individual on a path of honesty andright living

Age of Reason

Penitentiary developed as aninstitution where criminals could: Be isolated from temptations of

society

Reflect on their offenses

Be reformed

Learning Objective 3

Learning objective 3: Understand thecontribution of Cesare Beccaria and theclassical school.

Page 21: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

21

Learning Objective 3

Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794)

Italian scholar who applied the rationalistphilosophy of the Enlightenment to thecriminal justice system

True aim and only justification for punishmentis utility

First attempt to explain crime in secular, orworldly, terms instead of religious terms

Learning Objective 3

Classical Criminology

School of criminology that viewsbehavior as stemming from free will, thatdemands responsibility andaccountability of all perpetrators, andthat stresses the need for punishmentssevere enough to deter others.

Classical Criminology

Main principles:

Basis of all social action must be theutilitarian concept of the greatest good forthe greatest number of people.

Crime must be considered an injury tosociety, and the only rational measure ofcrime is the extent of the injury.

Page 22: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

22

Classical Criminology

Main principles:

Prevention of crime is more important thanpunishment for crimes.To prevent crime, laws must beimproved and codified so that citizens can understandand support them.

Secret accusations and torture must be abolished.Accused have a right to speedy trials and to humanetreatment before trial and right to bring forwardevidence on their behalf.

Classical Criminology

Main principles:

The purpose of punishment is crimedeterrence, not social revenge. Certainty andswiftness in punishment, rather than severitybest secure this goal.

Imprisonment should be more widelyemployed, and better physical quarters shouldbe provided, with prisoners classified by age,sex, and degree of criminality.

Classical Criminology

Beccaria:

Punishment must be essentiallypublic, prompt, necessary, the leastpossible in given circumstances,proportionate to the crime, dictatedby laws.

Page 23: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

23

Learning Objective 4

Learning objective 4: Understand thecontribution of Jeremy Bentham and theutilitarians.

Learning Objective 4

Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)

English advocate of utilitarianismin prison management anddiscipline.Argued for thetreatment and reform ofprisoners.

Learning Objective 4

Utilitarianism

Doctrine that the aim of all actionshould be the greatest possiblebalance of pleasure over pain, hencethe belief that a punishment inflictedon an offender must achieve enoughgood to outweigh the pain inflicted.

Page 24: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

24

Bentham’s Views

Criminals were childlike or unbalanced, lacking theself-discipline to control their passions by reason.

Behavior was not preordained, rather an exercise offree will.

Crime not sinful but the result of impropercalculation.

Criminal law should be organized so that theoffender would derive more pain than pleasure froma wrongful act.

Learning Objective 5

Learning objective 5: Discuss the work ofJohn Howard and its influence oncorrectional reform.

Learning Objective 5

John Howard (1726-1790)

English prison reformer whose bookThe Stateof Prisons in England andWales contributedgreatly to the passage of the Penitentiary Actof 1779 by the House of Commons.

County squire

Social activist

Sheriff of Bedfordshire

Page 25: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

25

John Howard

Shocked by conditions in Englishcorrectional facilities

Rallied legislative interest in reform

Major proponent of the penitentiary

English Parliament passed PenitentiaryAct of 1779 based on Howard’sprinciples

Penitentiary Act of 1779

A secure and sanitary structure

Systematic inspections

Abolition of fees

Reformatory regimen

Chapter 3The History of Corrections in America

Page 26: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

26

Learning Objectives

1. Describe “The Great Law” of Pennsylvania andnote its importance.

2. Distinguish the basic assumptions of thepenitentiary system of Pennsylvania and NewYork.

3. Discuss the elements of the CincinnatiDeclaration.

4. Understand the reforms advocated by theProgressives.

Learning Objectives

5. Discuss the assumptions of the medical model,regarding the nature of criminal behavior and itscorrection.

6. Illustrate how the community model reflectedthe social and political values of the 1960s and1970s.

7. Describe the forces and events that led to thepresent crime control model.

Learning Objective 1

Learning objective 1: Describe “TheGreat Law” of Pennsylvania and note itsimportance.

Page 27: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

27

Learning Objective 1

• The Great Law of Pennsylvania– Based on humane Quaker principles

and emphasized hard labor in a houseof correction as punishment for mostcrimes.• Death reserved for premeditated

murder

Penitentiary

An institution intended to isolate prisoners fromsociety and from one another so that they couldreflect on their past misdeeds, repent, and thusundergo reformation.

◦ First appeared in 1790

◦ Philadelphia’sWalnut Street Jail

◦ American penitentiary attracted world attention Tocqueville

Learning Objective 2

Learning objective 2: Distinguish thebasic assumptions of the penitentiarysystem of Pennsylvania and NewYork.

Page 28: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

28

Pennsylvania System Principles(Separate Confinement)

1. Prisoners would not be treated vengefully butshould be convinced that through hard andselective forms of suffering they could changetheir lives.

2. Solitary confinement would prevent furthercorruption inside prison.

3. In isolation, offenders would reflect on theirtransgressions and repent.

Pennsylvania System Principles

4. Solitary confinement would bepunishment because humans are by naturesocial beings.

5. Solitary confinement would be economicalbecause prisoners would not need longperiods of time to repent, and thereforefewer keepers would be needed and thecosts of clothing would be lower.

New York (Auburn) System

• Congregate System

– Inmates held in isolation at night but worked withother prisoners during the day under a rule of silence.

• Contract Labor System

– Inmate labor sold on a contractual basis to privateemployers who provided the machinery and rawmaterials with which inmates made salable productsin the institution.

Page 29: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

29

Development in South and West

Lease System

Inmates leased to contractors who providedprisoners with food and clothing in exchangefor their labor. In southern states, the prisonerswere used as field laborers.

Leasing program used extensively in California,Montana, Oregon, andWyoming until passageof the Anti-Contract Law of 1887.

Learning Objective 3

Learning objective 3: Discuss theelements of the Cincinnati Declaration.

Cincinnati Declaration of Principles

1870 Meeting of the National Prison Association:

Prison operations should stem from aphilosophy of inmate change, with reformationrewarded by release.

Indeterminate length sentences replaced byfixed sentences.

Reformation, rather than lapse of timenecessary for prisoner’s release.

Page 30: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

30

Cincinnati Declaration of Principles

Classification of prisoners on the basisof character and improvement.

Penitentiary practices of fixedsentences, the lockstep, rules ofsilence and isolation seen as debasingand humiliating.

Learning Objective 4

Learning objective 4: Understand thereforms advocated by the Progressives.

Learning Objective 4

Progressives

Group that attacked the excesses of bigbusiness and placed their faith in stateaction to deal with the social problems ofslums, adulterated food, dangerousoccupational conditions, vice, and crime.

Members of the positivist school ofcriminology

Page 31: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

31

Positivist School

Human behavior is a product of biological,economic, psychological, and social factorsand that the scientific method can beapplied to ascertain the causes of individualbehavior.

Positivist School Assumptions

• Criminal behavior is not the result of free willbut stems from factors over which the individualhas no control:

– Biological characteristics

– Psychological maladjustments

– Sociological conditions

• Criminals can be treated so that they can leadcrime-free lives.

• Treatment must center on the individual and theindividual’s adjustment.

Progressive Reforms

Probation

Recognized individual differences and allowedoffenders to be treated in the community undersupervision.

Indeterminate Sentences

Minimum and maximum terms, within whichthe correctional process of rehabilitation couldoperate.

Parole

Page 32: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

32

Learning Objective 5

Learning objective 5: Discuss the assumptionsof the medical model, regarding the nature ofcriminal behavior and its correction.

Learning Objective 5

Medical model

Assumption that criminal behavior is caused bysocial, psychological, or biological deficienciesthat require treatment.

1929:

Congress authorized the Federal Bureau ofPrisons to develop institutions to ensure properclassification, care, and treatment of offenders.

Learning Objective 5

1950s came to be known as the Era ofTreatment.

Prisons were to become something likemental hospitals that would rehabilitate andtest the inmate for readiness to reentersociety.

Page 33: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

33

Learning Objective 6

Learning objective 6: Illustrate how thecommunity model reflected the socialand political values of the 1960s and1970s.

Learning Objective 6

Social and political values of 1960s and 1970s: Civil rights movement

War on poverty

Resistance to theVietnamWar

Americans challenged government institutionsdealing with: Education

Mental health

Juvenile delinquency

Adult corrections

Learning Objective 6

Community corrections Reintegrating the offender into the community

should be the goal of the criminal justice system.

Attica Prison Riot Officials urged to make decarceration through

community corrections the goal and make greateruse of alternative such as: Probation

Halfway houses

Community service

Page 34: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

34

Attica Prison Riot

Learning Objective 7

Learning objective 7: Describe theforces and events that led to thepresent crime control model.

Learning Objective 7

Crime control model ofcorrections:

Criminal behavior can becontrolled by more use ofincarceration and other forms ofstrict supervision.

Page 35: Faulkner University -

2/13/2011

35

Learning Objective 7

Reasons for return to crime control model:

Political climate change in 1970s and 1980s

Crime rate at historic levels

Response by legislators, judges, criminaljustice officials

By 1980, crime and punishment becameintense subject for ideological conflict,partisan politics, legislative action.

Next Week:

Chapter 4: Punishment of Offenders

Chapter 5: Law of Corrections

Chapter 6: Correctional Client

http://filmore.net/faulknerclass/index.html