Huile de lin ATTENTION : Huile de lin ÉLIMINATION : POUR ...
FATES-COMARC 1 Riverine transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from Kaoping River (Taiwan) to...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of FATES-COMARC 1 Riverine transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from Kaoping River (Taiwan) to...
1
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Riverine transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from Kaoping River
(Taiwan) to coastal ocean
Chon-Lin Lee1*, Bing-Sian Lin1, and James T. Liu2
1 Department of Marine Environment and Engineering2 Institute of Marine Geology and Chemistry
National Sun Yat-sen University
2
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Introduction
What are Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)?
Hydrophobic Organic Compounds (HOC) Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
3
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Anthracene
Phenanthrene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pryene
Ring structure of PAHs
4
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Introduction
Suspect carcinogens
Endocrine disruptors
Bioaccumulation
Source identification
Why PAHs?
5
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Petrogenic sources
Oil spillIndustrial waste
PAHs inenvironment
Pyrogenic sources
Industrial emissionVehicles emission
Open-burning emission
Diagenetic source
Diagenesis of biogenic precursorsRetene
Perylene
6
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARCSource identification
Phenanthrene
Fluorene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Anthracene
Acenaphthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Fluoranthene
Chrysene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pryene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Alkyl- phenanthrenesCH3
Naphthalene
7
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
PC3(17.3% )
PC4(1
6.5
%)
surface trap
bottom trap
S. shelf
canyon sediment
N. shelf
PC3 vs PC4
Oil source
Gasoline vehicle source
Down-canyon heading samples
Up-canyon heading sample
00
9090
180180
270270
UpcanyonUpcanyonUpcanyonUpcanyon
Down-Down-canyoncanyonDown-Down-canyoncanyon
T4KP
M-D Fang, W-K Chang, C-L Lee, James T. Liu, 2009, J. Mar. Syst. (76) 457-467
8
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
PC1(33.5% )
PC2(2
4.6
%)
surface trap
bottom trap
S. shelf
canyon sediment
N. shelf
PCA score plot – PC1 versus PC2
M-D Fang, W-K Chang, C-L Lee, James T. Liu, 2009, J. Mar. Syst. (76) 457-467
9
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Fate of anthropogenic HOCs and fluvial particles?
N. Shelf
S. ShelfCanyonOuter Shelf
10
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Objectives
• To estimate the annual fluvial discharges of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and particulate organic carbons from Gaoping River
• To deploy PAH diagnostic ratios and statistical tools (e.g. principal component analysis) for source recognition
12
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARCMethods
(1) Soxhlet extraction
(2) liquid-liquid extraction (3) rotary evaporation
(4) Clean up
(5) GC-MS
M-D Fang, F-C Ko, J. E. Baker, C-L Lee, 2008, Sci. Total Environ. (407) 548-565
13
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
NO
V 0
6
DE
C 0
6
JAN
07
FEB
07
MA
R 0
7
APR
07
MA
Y07
JUN
07
JUL
07
OC
T 0
7
NO
V 0
7
PAH
con
cent
ratio
ns (
ng/L
)
0
200
400
600
800particulate phasedissolved phase
TSP
(m
g/L
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
700750800
TSP
PAH concentrations (ng/L)
14
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
TSP ( mg/ L )0 200 400 600 800
part
icula
te P
AH
s (n
g/L
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600Dry seasonWet season
R=0.95 (p < 0.05 )
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
R=0.69
Particulate PAHs(ng/L) VS TSP
15
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Particulate PAHs(ng/g) VS POC
POC (%)
0 2 4 6 8 10
par
ticu
late
PA
Hs
(ng/
g)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
NOV06
DEC06
JAN07
FEB07
MAR07
APR07
MAY07
JUN07
JUL07
OCT07
NOV07
R=0.584
16
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Source Identification
BaA/228
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
IP/I
P+
Bgh
i
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Straw burningDry seasonWet season
UnburnedPetroleum
PetroleumCombustion
Mixed Sources Combustion
Grass,Wood & Coal Combustion
UnburnedPetroleum
NOV06
DEC06JAN07
FEB07APR07
MAR07
MAY07
JUN07JUL07
OCT07
Petrogenic
Pyrogenic
17
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Rain
fall (
mm
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Dis
charg
e (
m3/s
ec
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Pingtung RainfallGaoping River Discharge
Dry season Wet season
Sampling
Precipitation
May 07
18
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARCPC1 score plot
PC1 scores
Pyrogenic source
Petrogenic source
M-D Fang, P-C Hsieh, F-C Ko, J. E. Baker, C-L Lee, 2007, Mar. Pollut. Bull. (54), 1179-1189. & J-J Jiang, C-L Lee, M-D Fang, James T. Liu, Mar. Pollut. Bull. In
Press
19
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
HCA cluster
• Canyon and Southern shelf Ⅰ
• Northern shelf
• Wet season
• Canyon and Southern shelf Ⅱ
• Dry season
• Straw burning
20
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARCP
AH
s %
0
5
10
15
20
Canyon and Southern shelf ¢¹Northern shelfCanyon and Southern shelf ¢º
Flu
o
MeF
1
DB
T Ph
An
MeP
3
MeP
2
MeA
2
MeP
45
MeP
1
DM
D46
DM
P36 Flt Py
BaF
l
Bb
Fl
BaA
Ch
ryT
riP
he
Bb
Fa
Bk
Fa
BeP
y
BaP
y
Per
y IP
Bgh
iP
Cor
o
0
5
10
15
20
Wet seasonDry season
HCA Compositional pattern
Methyl-PAHs
S
CH3
CH3 S
Pyrogenic
21
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
PC1 (25%)-1 0 1
FluoMeF1DBT
PhAn
MeP3MeP2MeA2
MeP45MeP1
DMD46DMP36
FltPy
BaFlBbFlBaA
ChryTriPheBbFaBkFaBePyBaPyPery
IPBghiPCoro
PC2 (20%)-1 0 1
PC3 (19%)-1 0 1
PCA LoadingS
CH3
CH3 S
Mixed Sources
pyrolysis
Petroleum
pyrolysis
22
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
PC1 (25% )
-2 -1 0 1 2
PC
2 (
20%
)
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3Canyon & S. shelf¢¹Canyon & S. shelf ¢ºN. shelfDry seasonWet season
River Suspended Particles
Coastal Surface Sediments
Between wet and dry season : Mixed Sources
23
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
PC2 (20% )
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
PC
3 (
19%
)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Petrogenic
pyrogenic
Pyrogenic
Biomass/petroleum combustion
Unburned Petroleum
Diesel oil
Canyon & S. shelf¢¹Canyon & S. shelf ¢ºN. shelfDry seasonWet season
24
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Estimate PAHs FluxN
OV 0
6
DEC 0
6
JAN
07
FEB 0
7
MAR
07
APR
07
MAY 0
7
JUN
07
JUL
07
Aug 0
7
Sep 0
7
OCT 0
7
NO
V 0
7
PA
H F
lux
(kg/
mon
th)
40
80
120
5001000150020002500
Dis
char
ge (
CM
S)
500100015002000
4000
5000
2500
20000
40000
60000
Particulate FluxDissolved FluxDischarge
Total Flux: 4.3 ton/year
Wet season : 99.0%
Krosa typhoon:
Particulate phase : 12.8%
Dissolved phase : 6.7%
Typhoon:
Aug : Pabuk, Wutip, Sepat
Sep : Wipha
Oct : Krosa
Nov : MitagOct 07
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Dis
charg
e (
m3/s
ec
)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Gaoping River Discharge
Krosa typhoon
sampling
25
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Koc=0.715Kow+2.418 R2=0.85
Kow
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5
Koc
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
Means et al., 1980This studyFernandes et al., 1997
Koc=Kow-0.317
Koc=0.70Kow+2.75
26
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Wet season Dry season
Sources petrogenic pyrogenic
PAH concentration 85- 196 ng/L 200- 515 ng/L
Dissolved phase 13- 41 ng/L 57- 152 ng/L
Particulate phase 160- 592 ng/L 12- 49 ng/L
397-1144 ng/g 790-1797 ng/g
Summary
27
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Sediment discharge 18.7 MT/year
organic carbon discharge 95 kT/year
PAH fluvial discharge 4.3 ton/year
Wet season Dry season
Dissolved phase 85.4 % 14.6 %
Particulate phase 99.7 % 0.3 %
Wet season Dissolved phase Particulate phase
Typhoon 48.1 % 67.0 %
Summary
28
FATES-COMARCFATES-COMARC
Acknowledgements
• National Science Council for funding support
• Prof. H-L Lin for the precious samples