Famous quote about safety: “It will never happen to me” Captain … · 2017. 5. 10. · Famous...
Transcript of Famous quote about safety: “It will never happen to me” Captain … · 2017. 5. 10. · Famous...
Famous quote about safety: “It will never happen to me” Captain E.J. Smith (1850 – 1912), Captain of the Titanic
Acknowledgements
Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi)Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation & Nuclear Safety (BMU)
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)Economy and Science Ministries of North-Rhine-Westphalia (NRW)
University of Muenster (WWU)Helmholtz Association and Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Funding:German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)within the project “Safebatt”
German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)within the project “Batterie2020”
German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project “Electrolyte Lab 4E”
Acknowledgements
Energy Density, Lifetime and Safety – Not Only an Issue of Lithium Ion BatteriesA. Friesen#, Falko Schappacher # and Martin Winter# x
81. Annual Meeting of DPG and Spring Meeting, Münster, 27 - 31 March 2017
xHelmholtz-Institut Münster (HI MS)#MEET Battery Research Center, Institute for Physical Chemistry, University of MünsterE-mail: [email protected]: [email protected]
Batteries in the Center of a Sustainable Energy Scenario
Page 5
The Lithium Ion Advantage: High Energy and/or High Power Densities in Comparison to “Conventional” Energy Storage Systems
Page 6
0.01
110
00
Ener
gy D
ensi
ty(W
h/kg
)
Power Density (W/kg)
100
10 100 1000
100.
1
Lead-acid battery
Ni-Cd battery
Super-capacitor
Phys. capacitor
200
100 200 800300 400 700
00 500 600
400
600
800
1000
1200
Li/O2
Cell
System
Li/S
System
Cell
Cell
System
System
Cell
*
Ener
gy D
ensi
ty /
Wh
L-1
Specific Energy / Wh kg-1
LIB (State of the Art)
LIB (energy optimized)
*Presuming: Li-metal
Wh/L =
Wh/kg
The Lithium Ion Advantage: High Energy Density per Volume in Comparison to Eventual Future Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems**
**Based on Lit. Data
Active and Inactive Materials:From Material Level to Battery Level
Page 8
[1] D. Andre, S.-J. Kim, P. Lamp, S.F. Lux, F. Maglia, O. Paschos, B. Stiaszny, Fut J. Mater. Chem. A, 3 (2015) 6709-6732.
[1]
Goals for specific energy
Specific energy/energy density of LIBs:
Specific energyWhkg
=Capacity Cell ∗ Cell voltage
Mass active & inactive materials
Energy densityWh
L=
Capacity Cell ∗ Cell voltageVolumen active & inactive material𝑠𝑠
Effect on specific energy/energy density
Increasing amount of inactive
components Decreasing energy density
Active material Electrode Cell Battery module Battery system Application
Material
Page 9
LIB: State of the Art and Near Future
Page10
Page 11
LIB: State of the Art and Near Future
Multi Component System
Physical Properties
Electrochemical Properties
Lithium salt Solvent Additive
Energy Power(Temperature)
Costs Durablity Safety
Performance & Costs
Page 10
Multicomponent System
Electrolyte as Key Component of the Battery Cell
Liquid electrolytes need separator: organic and/or ceramic
Electrode
Page 13
Powdery MaterialsComposite Electrode Structures
Page 14
Active material Conductive agent
Binder / Porosity / Electrolyte
Current collector
Amount in the composite electrode:Binder: ~ 1-5 wt.%Conductive agent: ~ 1-5 wt.%
Hig
h En
ergy
Performance of LIB:Electrode Level – Active Material
Page 15
Increasing energy density
High content of active material increases energy density at the
expense of power capability
e-
e-
Hig
h Po
wer
Cathode NCM1:1 (Conductive Agent:Binder)80 µm DFT, 30% porosityAnode Graphite1:1 (Conductive Agent, Binder)80 µm DFT, 30% porosity
0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
Ener
gy D
ensi
ty (W
ithou
t Cas
ing)
/ W
h kg
-1
Active Material / wt.%
Decreasing resistanceDFT: Dry Film Thickness
Performance of LIB:Electrode Level – Electrode Porosity
Page 16
Li+
Li+High energyCathode93:3:4 (NCM:Conductive Agent:Binder)80 µm DFTAnode92:1:7 (Graphite:Conductive Agent:Binder)80 µm DFT
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.70
50
100
150
200
250
Ener
gy D
ensi
ty (W
ithou
r Cel
lcas
ing)
/ W
h kg
-1
Electrode Porosity / %
Increasing ionic conductivity
Increasing electronic conductivityDFT: Dry Film Thickness
Increasing the electrode thickness increases the energy density but enlarges distances
for ion and electron transportReduced power capabilities
High potential to increasethe energy density
Performance of LIB:Electrode Level – Dry Film Thickness
Page 17
Li+
e-
Li+
e-
Hig
h En
ergy
Hig
h Po
wer
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
50
100
150
200
250
300
Ener
gy D
ensi
ty (W
ithou
t Cel
lcas
ing)
/ W
h kg
-1
DFT / µm
Cathode93:3:4 (NCM:ConductiveAgent:Binder)30% porosityAnode92:1:7 (Graphite:ConductiveAgent:Binder)30% porosity
Increasing Diffusion Distance
Increasing Amount of Inactive Material
Performance of LIB:Electrode Level
Page 18
High Power Density Electrode
High EnergyDensity ElectrodeHigh Power
Density High Energy
Density
• Porosity (Calendering)• Particle Size (primary and secondary)• Dry Film Thickness (DFT)
• Current collector thickness• Tab position• Tab welding
Variation of parameters
Cell
Page 19
Comparison of Cell Types:Advantages and Disadvantages
Cylindrical
Prismatic
Pouch
Low weightShock- and vibration-tolerantDesign flexibility
Mechanical StabilityExternal pressure required
Heat transferEasy packaging
Slow and complex manufacturingExpensive
High energy densityEasy and fast manufacturing
Fast heating
Battery Line in MEET – 5 Ah (Pouch)
Materials Mixing Coating and Drying Calandering
Type: 5 AhCell AssemblySlitting
Cell Safety
Page 22
5 2010 20150
1
2
3
4
5
Wor
ldw
ide
EV F
ires
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20150
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
U.S
. Veh
icle
Fire
s
Year
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
Wor
ldw
ide
EV F
ires
U.S.VEHICLE FIRE TRENDS AND PATTERNS
Fire Incidents with ICE und EV
Page 23
• 90 vehicle fires per billion miles of ICE (only US data)• 12 Total Fire Incidents with EV (Worldwide)• 6 Tesla fires (total) and 3 billion miles driven
2 Tesla fires per billion miles
6x Tesla Model S2x Chevrolet Volt2x Fisker Karma1x Zotye1x BYD e62x Mitsubishi
http://insideevs.com/number-of-fire-related-deaths-per-year-caused-by-evs/
Abuse Behavior of Lithium Ion Cells
QDissipation<
QGeneration
Thermal Runaway
VentingRupture
Fire
Fire/Explosion
Heat Generation
Elevated Temperature
QDissipation>
QGeneration
Safe Outcome
Intelligent design of battery packs(e.g. heat exchange with active/passive heat sink) Page 24
Systematic Approach to Lithium Ion Material Safety
Fire is a by-product of combustion (= process of rapid oxidation of fuel). In order to ignite and burn, a fire requires three elements: Heat, Fuel, and Oxygen represented by the "Fire Triangle" (cf. science of fire fighting). The fire is prevented or extinguished by “removing” any one of them. A fire naturally occurs when the elements are combined in the right proportions (e.g., more heat is needed to ignite some fuels).
Sometimes it is useful to consider a fourth essential element of fire, the sustaining Chemical Chain Reaction (⇒ "Fire Tetrahdron")
M. Winter, Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond, Industry Report, 2017http://totalbatteryconsulting.com/industry-reports/Li-Ion-and-beyond-report/overview.html
The Fire Tetrahedron in a Lithium-Ion Cell – Materials View
Heat/Energy Release via• Anode or cathode decomposition• Cell short: internal/external
Combustibles• Li (High surface area)• Electrolyte solvents (and salts) • Gases (Hydrogen-rich)
• Oxygen • Release from layered cathodes
during overcharge• Oxygen access to cell after cell
rupture/opening via gas pressure build-up or external impact
M. Winter, Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond, Industry Report, 2017http://totalbatteryconsulting.com/industry-reports/Li-Ion-and-beyond-report/overview.html
The Fire Tetrahedron in a Lithium-Ion Cell – Materials View: Countermeasures
Heat/Energy Release via• Anode or cathode decomposition• Cell short: internal external
Combustibles• Li (Dendrites)• Electrolyte solvents (and salts)• Gases (Hydrogen-rich)
Oxygen Release from layered
cathodes during overcharge Oxygen access to cell after
cell rupture/opening via gas pressure build-up or external impact
(Radical) Chain Reaction
Material StabilizationCoolingRapid Heat Transfer
Radical scavengersShut-down, etc.(additives, separators)
No Li metalNon-flammable electrolytesGas suppression
Stable cathodes,e.g., LiFePO4
Suppression of gas pressure, etc.
M. Winter, Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond, Industry Report, 2017http://totalbatteryconsulting.com/industry-reports/Li-Ion-and-beyond-report/overview.html
Accelerating Rate Calorimetry (ARC):Thermal Stability of LIB Cells
Page 28
Bottom Heater
Top Heater
Side
Hea
ter
Side
Hea
ter
Thermocouple
Voltage Tab
• Adiabatic environment
𝑄𝑄𝐺𝐺 → Cell HeatingHeat Generation:
𝑄𝑄𝐷𝐷 = 0 𝐽𝐽Heat Dissipation:
• Measurement of self-sustaining exothermic heat due to decomposition reactions
• No heat dissipation into surrounding
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
T / °
C
t / min
Thermal runaway
High precision
High reproducibility
Only thermal abuse
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Self
Hea
t Rat
e / K
min
-1
T / °C
Self
Heat
Rate
(SHR
) / K
min
-1
T / °C
Self-Heat Rate > 10 K min-1: Thermal runaway
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Self
Hea
t Rat
e / K
min
-1
T / °C
ARC: Thermal Stability of LIB CellsProcesses at Moderate Temperatures
Page 29
Anode
Cathode
Electrolyte
Aluminum
Copper
• SEI conversion and decomposition
• Low exothermic heat release
At a stage, where it is easyto counteract
Electrolyte
SEI
Anode
Electrolyte
SEI
Anode
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
T / °
C
t / min
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Self
Hea
t Rat
e / K
min
-1
T / °C
Page 30
• Li (from anode) reacts with electrolyte
• Temperature dependent reaction rate
• Increased gas evolution
Cell venting
Electrolyte
SEI
Anode0 200 400 600 800
0
100
200
300
T / °
C
t / min
O
OO
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CO2
CH4
Electrolyte
SEI
Anode
Anode
Cathode
Electrolyte
Aluminum
Copper
ARC: Thermal Stability of LIB CellsProcesses at Medium Temperatures
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Self
Hea
t Rat
e / K
min
-1
T / °C
Page 31
Layered oxide cathode
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
T / °
C
t / min
Anode
Cathode
Electrolyte
Aluminum
Copper
• Cathode decomposition
• O2 evolution and electrolyte oxidation • Highly exothermic reaction• Generation of large amounts of
gaseous products
Cell rupture, explosion and fire(worst case)
O
O
O
O
OO O
O
O
OO
O
OCO2
CH4
SHR > 10 K min-1
ARC: Thermal Stability of LIB CellsProcesses at Elevated Temperatures
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850
160
180
200
220
240
T Ther
mal
Run
away
/ °C
Volumetric Energy Density / Wh l-1
NCM111NCM523NCM523/LMO
NCM523NCM523/LCO
LCO
NCANCA
NCA
NCM811NCM111/LCO
NCM111NCM523NCM523/LMO
NCM523 NCM523/LCO
LCO
NCANCA
NCA
NCM811
NCM111/LCO
Case Study:Cell Safety of 18650 Cells
Page 32
Tesla Model S cell (calculation based on NCR18650B)
CATL high power cells for 2017 [3]CATL high energy cells for 2017-2018 [3]
Goal of Renault/Nissan alliance with LIB Tech. [1] LG for 2021 [2]
High/middle power density cellsHigh energy density cells
[1] ZOE Battery Durability, Field Experience and Future Vision, AABC 2017, Mainz, Germany, [2] Advances in High-Energy Density Lithium-ion Polymer Battery for EV, AABC 2016, Mainz, Germany [3] Advanced xEV Battery Development at CATL, AABC 2017, Mainz, Germany
160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
160
180
200
220
240
T Ther
mal
Run
away
/ °C
Gravimetric Energy Density / Wh kg-1
Layered OxideLCO – LiCoO2NCM111 – LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2NCM523 – LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2NCM811 – LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2NCA - Li(Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05)O2
SpinelLMO – LiMn2O4
1. Material level
• Energy density determined by materials
• Large variety of materials and combinations
• High research intensity
2. Electrode level
• Power capability determined mostly by the electrode design
• Power increase at the expense of energy density
• Many possibilities to increase both power and energy densities
3. Cell level
• Energy density achievable with thermally less stable materials
• More improvements needed on material and cell level for EV application(both with regard to safety and performance)
Summary
Page 33
• Dr. Michael M. Thackeray, Argonne National Laboratory• Dr. Kai Vuorilehto, EAS Germany GmbH• Prof. Jeff Dahn, Dalhousie University• Dr. Ann Laheäär, Skeleton Technologies• Prof. Jiang Jiuchun, Beijing Jiaotong University• Prof. Bernd Friedrich, RWTH Aachen University
http://battery-power.eu
28. – 30. März 2017 Welcome in Aachen
Früher war alles besser –aber nicht die BatterienMartin Winter , 30. März 2017
1. Direktor des Helmholtz Institut Münster (HI MS), IEK-12, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, Germany
2. Wissenschaftlicher Direktor des MEET Batterieforschungszentrum, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, Germany