Shoe ReviewS:

Performance—iii • Neutral—iv • Motion Stabilizing—v

Each season, the overall direction of the footwear industry is revealed in trends. For more than four years,we’ve reported that companies have been lightening up many of their shoes and this continues. The growing

influence of minimalism and “barefoot” running, in conjunction with improved technologies and formulationsof components and refined design, has resulted in more shoes with less structure, lighter weight, and fewermotion-controlling features. Our racing shoe reviews have always looked at shoes that feature the least amountof support, weight, or inhibiting features, but this trend extends deeper than ever into the training shoe catego-ry. A number of high-mileage shoes have also benefitted from this trend, slimming down without compromis-ing their protective cushioning. And there is a shrinking but significant offering of heavier models that cater torunners who need extra cushioning or even more significant structure to counteract overpronation.

Geometry is another significant trend in the design of running shoes. Attention is being focused on more criti-cal midsole shaping, the flare (depth and shape) of flex grooves, the size and positioning of crashpads, and theratio between heel and forefoot heights. Along with these considerations, designers and development teams arecarefully considering the material of each of these elements, appraising their rebound and dampening effects,in addition to their durability and comfort. The results of this focus on geometry can be seen in two types ofofferings: highly engineered models and spare, simplified designs.

These two trends are refining the way that running shoes perform when you take them out on a run, making iteasier than ever to find a shoe perfectly suited to your biomechanical and situational needs.

—Cregg Weinmann, Running Network Footwear Reviewer

fall shoe review 2010:Spring Shoe Review 09 8/5/10 10:29 PM Page 1

In the spring of 1991, it was my great good fortune to meet Emil Zatopek, winner of three Goldsat the 1952 Olympics (5000m, 10,000m, marathon) and two medals in 1948 (Gold in the10,000m and Silver in the 5000m). I was in awe.

After Emil served as our honorary assistant coach at the Ed Adams Invitational in Salinas, mycoaching partner Joe Mangan and I drove him to Carmel, California so he could see the beau-ty of Big Sur. During the drive, there was a twinkle in his eyes as he told us about his friendlyrivalry with Alain Mimoun, who finished second to him in numerous European and Olympicchampionships. It wasn’t until 1956, when Emil had injured himself training for the marathon,that Mimoun was victorious over Emil, and then he waited at the finish line as Zatopek finishedan honorable sixth place.

When I asked Emil how he got started running, he told me that he had needed a new pair ofboots and that was the prize for winning a local 5K race. So in the cold winter of 1944, Zatopekran his first race, won, and was given a new pair of boots—a necessary item in the cold, snowywinter in occupied Czechoslovakia.

The right footwear is a necessary item for all runners, no matter what their level. At theRunning Network LLC, we’re committed to making that search easier for you with this 2010Fall Shoe Review. You don’t have to win a race to get a great shoe—you simply need to visityour local running specialty store and try on a variety of shoes until you find the perfect onefor you. Best wishes!

Larry EderPresident, Running Network LLC

ii | Running Network 2010 Fall Shoe Review

American Track & Fieldwww.american-trackandfield.com

Athletes Onlywww.atf-athlete.com

Athletics (Canada)www.otfa.ca

Austin Fitwww.austinfitmagazine.com

California Track & Running Newswww.caltrack.com

Club Runningwww.rrca.org/clubrunning

Coaching Athletics Quarterly www.coachingathleticsq.com

Colorado Runnerwww.coloradorunnermag.com

Get Active!www.healthclubs.com

Greater Long Island Running Club’s Footnoteswww.glirc.org

Latinos Corriendowww.latinoscorriendo.com

MarathonGuide.comwww.marathonguide.com

Michigan Runnerwww.michiganrunner.net

Missouri Runner & Triathletewww.morunandtri.com

Running Journal & Racing Southwww.running.net

RunMinnesotawww.runmdra.org

RunOhiowww.runohio.com

Track & Field Newswww.trackandfieldnews.com

USATF’s Fast Forwardwww.usatf.org

USATF–New England’s Exchange Zonewww.usatfne.org

The Winged Footwww.nyac.org

The Winged Mwww.themac.com

Youth Runnerwww.youthrunner.com

Reviewer: Cregg Weinmann ProjectCoordinator/Editor: Christine JohnsonDesigner: Kristen Cerer Proofreader: MargSumner, Red Ink Editorial Services ShoePhotography: Daniel Saldaña, CreggWeinmann Advertising Sales: RunningNetwork LLC, Larry Eder, President,608.239.3785, larry@runningnetwork.comPublisher: Larry Eder, 608.239.3785 Website: www.runningnetwork.com For a Media Kit, please visit our website.

This 2010 Fall Shoe Review is produced independent-ly by Running Network LLC for its partner publica-tions. All shoes reviewed were tested by experienced,competitive runners who were matched to the biome-chanical purpose of each shoe model.

Copyright © 2010 by Running Network LLC. AllRights Reserved. No part of this publication may bestored, copied, or reprinted without prior written per-mission of Running Network LLC.

Running Network LLC and its partner publicationssuggest that, as with all fitness activities, you meetwith a healthcare professional before beginning orchanging your fitness regimen.

aSiCS gel-Nimbus 12

Best Shoe—Neutral

Saucony Progrid kinvara

Best Shoe—Performance

Nike Lunarglide+ 2

Best Shoe—Motion Stabilizing

k-Swiss Blade-Light

Best New Shoe

Mizuno wave Precision 11

Best Renovation

Brooks Summon 2

Best value

AWARD WINNERSBEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST VALUEFALL 2010

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

weLCoMe to the RuNNiNg NetwoRk’S

2010 FaLL Shoe Review

RuNNiNg NetwoRk

LLC PaRtNeRS

fall shoe review 2010:Spring Shoe Review 09 8/5/10 10:29 PM Page ii

iii | Running Network 2010 Fall Shoe Review

adidas adiZero Boston $100

To runners, “Boston” means the Boston Marathon; the adiZero Boston also takes its name from that race. Taking a page fromthe minimalist’s design book, it nestles into the adiZero line, the pure performance range of adidas running. The upper is a thin,open mesh with an internal framework of soft, synthetic suede supports and external overlays at heel and toe. A thin layer offoam at the ankle collar and in the tongue only where the laces tie provides just enough padding to secure the shoe comfort-ably without adding unnecessary weight. The midsole is a resilient chunk of EVA with a surprisingly low-profile feel. The heelis a combination of the effective ForMotion cassette and a substantial crashpad to manage the touchdown. It’s mated to a fore-foot of flexible adiPrene+. The result is an effective performance shoe that withstands the demands of high-mileage training.

“Well cushioned, even for daily training. Not bad in the weight department; light enough for faster running. I’ve been very pleased with theperformance.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to very mild overpronation • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14,15; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 11.5 oz. (size 11); Women 9.7 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, adiPrene Strobelboard (heel)

Brooks Summon 2 $85

The original Summon was a yeoman-like neutral shoe that generated a rather neutral response. The Summon 2 looks to changethat with some upgrades and a price reduction. The upper uses a more open mesh—an improvement, to be sure—though it’sjust a bit spare on the ankle collar foam. The fit is secure and overlays are well-placed; in fact, the medial side is shored up,especially at the first metatarsal head, though the tradeoff is that it’s not very bunion-friendly. The midsole is the new BioS-257,Brooks’ reliable foam made eco-friendly without compromising performance. In fact, it’s more responsive than the original for-mulation. The contouring of the foam gives the shoe a much-improved transition through the footstrike and a lower profileappearance. Runners looking for a lightweight, neutral, high-mileage shoe may be well-served by the Summon, honored as ourBest Value.

“Fit well with good support. Very good cushioning, nice responsive toe-off. Pretty light for a high mileage trainer, though a bit heavy for aperformance shoe. A good running shoe, plain and simple.”

Updates the Summon • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 6–12• Weight: Men 11.6 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, BioS-257 Strobel board

k-Swiss Blade-Light $100

The Blade-Light advances the concept behind the UltraNatural Run series, but with a little more heft. Surprisingly lightweight,its appearance may cause concern about handling heavy mileage, but its performance confirms that it can take just about what-ever you’re willing to throw at it. It’s very neutral—there’s no extra support in the shoe—and it provides plenty of cushion andgreat flexibility. The upper features a supportive saddle that keeps the foot centered over the midsole, which is a generous slabof molded EVA that has excellent flexibility. The outersole is minimal (largely exposed EVA) but with carbon rubber in the high-wear areas and a forefoot insert of blown rubber and Superfoam assisting the toe-off. What you get is much more than you seeat first look—so much so, that the Blade-Light earned honors as our Best New Shoe.

“These worked great for me, no matter what kind of running, but especially fast running.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–11,12 • Weight: Men 10.5 oz.(size 11); Women 8.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Superfoam Strobel board

Mizuno wave Precision 11 $97

The Precision has had a faithful audience through 10 updates and the Precision 11 may be the best yet. The upper is light-weight and the open mesh breathes well. The newly designed eyestay connects to three separate internal straps to cinch theupper where it needs to conform to the foot. A soft, sueded liner wraps the ankle and instep and an Ortholite innersole addscushioning and comfort. The midsole is AP+, providing a much-improved ride to the shoe that’s further enhanced by an artic-ulated version of the Wave Plate, a re-beveling of the heel, and an additional deflection zone in the midfoot to accommodate avariety of footstrikes and gaits. The outersole has more flex grooves to improve flexibility while maintaining durability in thehigh-wear areas thanks to the carbon rubber. The performance is perfect for fast running—tempo, speedwork, even some longraces—yet durable enough for day-to-day use for the biomechanically efficient, earning it honors as our Best Renovation.

“They fit snug mid-foot and have ample toe room. They feel comfortable and have good cushioning for their light weight.”

Updates the Wave Precision 10 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women6–11 • Weight: Men 11.0 oz. (size 11); Women 9.3 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

New Balance 759 $95

The New Balance approach to updates has always been conservative. The overall changes to the 759 appear minor when lookedat individually, but in combination, they’re enough to nudge the shoe into the Performance range. The consistent execution, fit,and ride have been little altered, but each of these areas benefits from the industry-wide trend of trimming weight from a shoewherever it reasonably can. The upper is a wide open mesh outer layer with a fine mesh lining. The overlays have beenredesigned, cleverly anchoring the foot to the midsole in a few strategic places while freeing it in the forefoot, providing sup-port while saving weight. The midsole is still ACTEVA Lite with the same basic N-ERGY set-up in the heel, though minor alter-ations to the components do improve the transition. The outersole is a bit more flexible and maintains the blown rubber fore-foot/carbon rubber heel that has worked well in this series. Runners will find the 759 to be a consistent and protective high-mileage trainer, which happens to weigh less than one might expect.

“I liked the shoe and the neutral colors. I noticed that NB did not use the ‘crinkly’ laces that tend to stay tied so well. The upper materialsare very breathable to help keep my feet dry and cool. They wore well, but the cushioning was about average.”

Updates the 758 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 (D,2E,4E); Women6–12,13 (2A,B,D) • Weight: Men 11.7 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted,polyurethane Strobel board

BEST VALUEFALL 2010

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

PeRFoRMaNCeweLCoMe to the RuNNiNg NetwoRk’S

2010 FaLL Shoe Review

fall shoe review 2010:Spring Shoe Review 09 8/5/10 10:29 PM Page iii

PeRFoRMaNCe/NeutRaL

iv | Running Network 2010 Fall Shoe Review

Nike Pegasus+ 27 $90

The Pegasus has been updated more than twice as many times as the next-longest model series in this review. That’s a lot ofwork poured into a shoe that continues to reflect the best in materials and know-how. The biggest story of #27 is its weight: It’salmost 5% lighter than last season. The light weight, however, doesn’t undermine its ability to handle the mileage demandedby serious runners. The upper features a routine airmesh with an effective saddle design that secures the midfoot and lines upthe foot over the midsole. The midsole features Cushlon for the first time (replacing the stalwart Phylon). Although there’s abump in price, it matches the bump in value. The outersole—waffle-fill in the forefoot and BRS 1000 in the heel—has excel-lent durability with traction to match. The sum of these parts adds up to one of the best versions yet of the Pegasus.

“They seemed a little snug [on] the first few runs, but I think now I would say they are supportive. The shoes have a lightweight bounce tothem. Very impressed with these shoes—good durability, fit, and cushion.”

Updates the Pegasus+ 26 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 11.8 oz. (size 11); Women 10.0 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

Saucony Progrid kinvara $90

The Kinvara is the most innovative shoe Saucony has produced this year, and it may well influence its line for some time tocome. The philosophy of “less is more” is on full display here. The upper is a gossamer-like, fine mesh over an open meshliner; the combination is both protective and breathable. Instead of a full ankle collar, twin ovals of memory foam guard eachside of the Achilles tendon and provide both secure fit and comfort. The midsole is a new EVA compound with more rubber forincreased resilience. An insert of ProGrid Lite in the heel smoothes the touch-down and a tweak to the heel/forefoot ratios—lowering the heel a bit with a generous forefoot—actually improves the overall cushioning as well as provides a more naturalbiomechanical position. Its combination of innovations and its feather-like weight earned the Kinvara honors as our Best Shoein the Performance category.

“Nice, secure fit. No slipping in heel even though it has little structure. Light as a feather, surprising how well they work for daily training.Any reservations I may have had about how light they were have been dispelled by their performance on the road.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 4–13,14,15,16,17; Women 5–12 • Weight: Men 7.7oz. (size 11); Women 6.7 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

Zoot ultra kane $150

Its light weight places the Ultra Kane squarely in the Performance category, but make no mistake about it: This is a full-featuredmotion stabilizing shoe. The upper takes a cue from their racer, the Ultra Speed, using compression fabric for a skin-tight fitthat flexes just enough to give support while still allowing the foot to move. The midsole is a beefed-up layer of full-length Z-bound over a high-quality EVA. These dual-density inserts sit on top of each other separated by a carbon shank and work as aunit to stabilize overpronation. The outersole—carbon rubber in the high-wear areas with blown rubber in the lateral forefoot—is segmented and pared back to save weight, while providing traction, flexibility, and comfort. Overall, the Ultra Kane bringsstability, cushioning, and performance to runners and triathletes serious about their run.

“Very snug, comfortable, and supportive. Pretty doggone light, especially for the stability and support. Great shoe, I have to say. No realdrawbacks for me.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to very mild overpronation • Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16; Women6–11 • Weight: Men 10.7 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

aSiCS gel-Cumulus 12 $100

The Cumulus fills an important role in ASICS’ impressive line of neutral shoes and Round 12 provides the expected quality andcushioning. A larger heel Gel component increases resiliency, and minor changes to the midsole sculpting and outersoleadjustments add stability while refining the transition from heelstrike to toe-off. The ride is much the same as before, just moredialed in. The upper is a nice, open mesh and employs HF-welded supports in the open areas and the logo stripes extend backtoward the top of the heel. Other overlays have been reduced or eliminated in areas that are now better supported by the alter-nate methods. The height of the ankle collar has been lowered to reduce possible irritation but the remaining memory foamconforms well. The interior has a plusher feel and forefoot cushioning has been upgraded by changing the 3⁄4-length SolyteStrobel board to full-length. These modifications and additions result in a better shoe, which is welcome news to Cumulus fans.

“Very secure fit, with plenty of padding—maybe more than needed. These have been reliably well-cushioned since the beginning, and Iappreciate the ride they provide. They are a bit heavy, but that trade-off seems necessary for the cushioning.”

Updates the Gel-Cumulus 11 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15 (D),7–13,14,15 (2E,4E); Women 5–13 (2A,B), 6–13 (D) • Weight: Men 13.5 oz. (size 11); Women 11.1 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved •Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board

aSiCS gel-Nimbus 12 $120

The flagship of ASICS’ neutral shoes isn’t what it used to be—it’s better. A men’s size 11 is 5% lighter than last year, the biggestweight loss (0.9 ounces!) among the slimmed-down mid-weight shoes in this review. The upper has retained the stretchy mesh,Biomorphic Fit panels, and asymmetrical lacing, but the individual eyelets have been separated into what ASICS calls DiscreteEyelet Construction to conform to the contours of the foot, improving the fit. The memory foam in the ankle collar has beenupgraded in quality and the collar height is lower to reduce the possibility of irritation. The midline flex grooves on the under-side of the midsole and as well as those in the outersole have been opened to allow the foot to follow a more natural path inits gait—put simply, the shoe flexes better with the foot. The plush ride, weight savings, and outstanding fit earned the Nimbus12 our Best Shoe award in the Neutral category.

“I am new to running, but these shoes really give me the desire to run farther than before. I have never worn any shoes more comfortablethan these.”

Updates the Gel-Nimbus 11 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16 (D),7–14,15,16 (2E,4E); Women 5–13 (B), 6-13 (2A,D) • Weight: Men 12.6 oz. (size 11); Women 10.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved •Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

fall shoe review 2010:Spring Shoe Review 09 8/5/10 10:29 PM Page iv

v | Running Network 2010 Fall Shoe Review

Brooks ghost 3 $100

The Ghost has evolved on its way to joining the hot-selling Adrenaline GTS as part of Brooks’ Go 2 Series. The upper is a wideopen mesh over a smaller mesh inner layer that moves moisture away and ventilates the foot. The pattern used for the upperhas changed a bit and those nips and tucks result in a better fit over the foot’s contours. The shoe has gained some weight, afair tradeoff for better cushioning and a plusher interior. The biggest improvement is the move to Brooks’ sprung last, which isused in the Glycerin and a few other styles. The profile of the forefoot sweeps up, providing a better transition and more ener-getic toe-off. The midsole is BioMoGo with its durable responsive ride and great flexibility. The HPR outersole and blown rub-ber forefoot are familiar and provide the expected performance: good traction, durability, and a little cushioning for your highmileage. Runners looking for responsive cushioning and durability in a mid-priced, neutral shoe should consider the Ghost.

“These shoes fit great. I have found them to be the shoe I have been reaching for when heading out for tempo runs, or this morning’s 1200s.My feet are happy even after 15 miles in them.”

Updates the Ghost 2 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 (B,D,2E); Women 5–12(2A,B,D) • Weight: Men 12.4 oz. (size 11); Women 10.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, S-257 Strobel board

Reebok Premier aztrec 2 $85

The Aztrec was an excellent entry-level, neutral trainer that’s now ready to play with the big boys, thanks to some excellentupdating by Reebok. It’ll cost you an additional five bucks, but it’s money well spent. The upper has upgraded foam, improvedtailoring, and a redesigned tongue, all improving fit and comfort. The injection-molded EVA midsole gets some help from theDMX Foam Strobel board, which is now full-length, and the ride is more responsive and quick instead of somewhat spongy asit was before. The flex grooves have been reworked and newly configured DMPRTEK provides its measure of cushion, as wellas durable traction. The heel has a slightly larger outersole pod to improve medial stability, while the lateral side works withthe crashpad to keep the foot from drifting inward. Here, design and execution were accomplished with value remaining frontand center in the designers’ vision.

“This shoe is light, stable, with the right amount of cushioning, [at] a decent price. What’s not to like?”

Updates the Premier Aztrec • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 12.7 oz. (size 11); Women 10.8 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, DMX FoamStrobel board

Reebok Premier verona Supreme $95

The Verona has gone through three iterations, each punctuated by methodical improvement. Though not intended for overpronators, the geometry of the midsole is now more forgiving of the efficiency breakdown that can occur with fatigue.There’s a lateral Shear unit, TPU arches that give a bit on impact and direct the foot from the lateral side, while a convex-shapedmedial midsole prevents the foot from rolling inward. The segmented outersole, flex grooves, and lateral crashpad provideadditional guidance to the foot for improved biomechanical efficiency, while the DMPRTEK outersole offers durable traction anda bit of extra cushioning. In concert, these changes provide a responsive, cushioned ride. The upper employs a stretch meshthat’s a bit more open for coolness and moving moisture. The tongue has been reshaped and softer lining materials used. TheKinetic Fit Panels are now combined with a SmoothFit interior to improve step-in comfort, even with barefoot use. The midfootis supported by the saddle created from the Vector stripes. The result is a responsive, mid-weight, mid-priced success story.

“They felt good from the first time I put them on. There’s a lot of padding around the collar. The toe box has a good amount of wiggle roomfor the tootsies. I felt like I was running (dare I say?) barefoot inside my socks and shoes.”

Updates the Premier Verona KFS 2 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14;Women 5–11,12 • Weight: Men 12.4 oz. (size 11); Women 10.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, DMXFoam Strobel board

Saucony Progrid Ride 3 $95

A bit bulkier than last year, the Ride now offers a plusher ride as the midsole features a larger lateral crashpad and forefootinsert. The midsole compound and ProGrid in the heel are durable and provide cushion without mushiness. The upper has asmaller percentage covered with overlays, favoring HF-welded supports in the interior of the forefoot, with fewer spots thatmight irritate. The fit is secure where necessary and there’s no slipping in the heel, thanks to memory foam in the collar. A mois-ture-wicking lining prevents the problems associated with wetness. The outersole has newly configured flex grooves, and whatappears to be a more substantial shank (though this is difficult to ascertain due to the nature and placement of the device) whichhelps keep the foot lined up through the footstrike. The durable carbon rubber heel and the blown rubber forefoot contributetheir well-known strengths to the layers of cushioning, providing a plush ride to the Ride.

“Quite a bit of cushioning, evenly distributed. They felt a bit heavy but they’re protective, I’ll say that much for them. They did a good job.”

Updates the ProGrid Ride 2 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14,15; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 13.1 oz. (size 11); Women 10.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, HRC Strobel board

karhu Stable Fulcrum Ride $120

Though the name doesn’t indicate it, the Stable Ride is an update to last year’s model. What else is the same, you ask? Themidsole components—including Karhu’s Fulcrum, here in the stability version—and the outersole are essentially the same.There are always tweaks, especially in updated shoes, but they’ve left the cushy ride and good transition unaltered. The upperhas several improvements, primarily for better fit and comfort. The ankle collar and inside heel area have been smoothed outand combine with exterior heel overlays to offer better support. The logo stripes have been scaled down slightly, and thin, indi-vidual HF-welded straps now secure the midfoot to the eyestay to provide support while conforming to the foot. The open fore-foot has been maintained, allowing the foot to spread comfortably. The weight is up slightly, but the stable, cushioned ride andsecure fit may be just what you’re looking for.

“Fit well from toes to ankles. Good stability and cushiness, but the heel felt a little tippy and took some getting used to.”

Updates the Stable Ride • Recommended for: low- to medium-high–arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 8–13,14;Women 6–11 • Weight: Men 13.8 oz. (size 11); Women 11.2 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

NeutRaL/MotioN StaBiLiZiNg

fall shoe review 2010:Spring Shoe Review 09 8/5/10 10:29 PM Page v

vi | Running Network 2010 Fall Shoe Review

Mizuno wave alchemy 10 $110

The Alchemy continues to be Mizuno’s most consistent motion stabilizing shoe. The midsole now features the AP+ foam for-mulation, adding noticeable responsiveness. The forefoot area of the midsole unit has been slightly broadened for better sta-bility and the midsole sculpting allows better articulation with both the ground and the Wave plate. The medial forefoot flexgrooves in the outersole have been greatly reduced without inhibiting the transition from heel to toe and the outersole has beeneven more differentiated by gender: The women’s lateral forefoot is more flexible, while the men’s is a bit stiffer, accommodat-ing average weight differences. New overlays supporting the eyestay wrap the foot better, while the top lateral eyelet is hingedfor better customization. The interior sports a new sueded material made even more comfortable by the memory foam ankle col-lar. The stability, cushioning, and comfort features make the Alchemy 10 Mizuno’s motion stabilizing MVP.

“It has a very nice balance of padding and ‘feel’ of the road. My foot feels well protected. After 100 miles, these shoes look and feel brandnew. I am pleased to notice that the dark gray collar (lining) around the ankle is a bit more durable than I have seen on most running shoes.”

Updates the Wave Alchemy 9 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16 (D,2E);Women 6–12 (AA,B) • Weight: Men 13.9 oz. (size 11); Women 11.2 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

New Balance 1226 $140

The 1226 is New Balance’s most performance-oriented motion stabilizing shoe and it updates the 1225 with some reshapingto improve support and secure the midfoot. Cushioning has been optimized by modifying the rubbery heel crashpad, and the1225’s three small rubbery inserts are now a single, dual-winged unit in the lateral midfoot that acts as a crashpad under thefifth metatarsal. Stability has been dialed in with adjustments to the Stability Web shank support, as well as a new iteration ofStabilicore that’s thicker where the forces are greatest and a bit thinner where they’re less. The outersole has been completelyreworked: Flex grooves have been repositioned and there’s a bit more blown rubber in the forefoot that’s die-cut to allow goodflexibility. The fit has also been refined with webbing loops running the length of the eyestay that we found to secure the foot abit better. The result is a stable, well-supported, well-cushioned shoe.

“Initial fit is comfortable and snug. It seems that these have a nicer and softer feel with some ‘squish.’ Remarkably, these don’t have thesame clunky feel that I’ve experienced in previous New Balance stability shoes. It’s a good, comfortable shoe.”

Updates the 1225 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with moderate to maximum overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16(B,D,2E,4E); Women 6–12 (AA,B,D) • Weight: Men 13.8 oz. (size 11); Women 11.5 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobelslip-lasted, polyurethane Strobel board

Nike Lunarglide+ 2 $100

The Nike Lunar shoes have been a work in progress, leapfrogging innovation with minor modifications and adjustments. TheLunarGlide+ 2 takes the platform and philosophy of the original and refines the final product. The upper has been tailored for abetter fit and a new configuration of Flywire in the midfoot provides support that holds the foot securely so it doesn’t slide aroundinside the open forefoot, a weakness of the initial round. The midsole and ride will be familiar as the Lunarlon foam and compo-nents have been retained in their original form. The outersole is essentially unchanged, providing a good combination of trac-tion and durability. The improvements to the upper, the continued great ride, and the welcome price freeze all contribute to earn-ing the LunarGlide+ 2 honors as our Best Shoe in the Motion Stabilizing category.

“Love the way they fit—nice and smooth, and hug your foot and arch. Super light, springy feeling while I run, but they still have plenty ofcushion and support. The stability of the shoes is good. They cinch up around my foot nicely and hold it in place quite well.”

Updates the LunarGlide+ • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to moderate overpronation • Sizes:Men 6–13,14,15; Women 5–12 • Weight: Men 12.2 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

Pearl izumi isoShift $120

The new IsoShift debuts Pearl Izumi’s new technology called the Graduated Guidance System. This is the most efficient mid-sole geometry that Pearl Izumi has used in a motion stabilizing shoe to date. It keeps the weight down by using a cradle of sec-ond density EVA foam to assist the foot through the gait cycle. The shoe affords plenty of stability with good cushioning thathas a bouncy response. The upper has the seam-free construction the brand is known for, along with HF-welded overlaysadding a touch of support at the top and bottom edges of the eyestay, and sturdier synthetic overlays in the heel and toe. A newoutersole configuration of carbon rubber provides durability and traction. If Pearl Izumi has been a satisfying choice for yourtraining, the IsoShift should be a quality performer for you.

“Fit well; it really secured my foot. Decent cushion, better after a few break-in miles. The stability was about as good as Pearl Izumi hasdone, and it feels a lot lighter.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with very mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–11,12 • Weight:Men 12.6 oz. (size 11); Women 10.4 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

Puma vectana 2 $100

For Puma, the Vectana ushered in a return to a traditional approach to motion stabilizing shoes and Version 2 irons out somebugs while refining its strengths. The fit has been adjusted, in part by tailoring, in part by the rake of the heel, and the shoenow fits true to size (the original ran about a half-size small). The upper—from the stretchy mesh to the memory foam anklecollar—is still very plush, while supportively securing the foot over the midsole. The cushioning is first-rate, thanks to a com-bination of components: mostly EVA and a blend of rubber, but the DuoCell unit in the heel contributes, as do the Ortholiteinnersole and ldCell Strobel board. The M2D (medial second density) extends farther from the arch toward the heel for betterstability. The outersole has increased decoupling in the heel to slow overpronation and more segmentation in the forefoot toprovide better flexibility for toe-off. The net effect is a plush, stable, high-mileage training shoe.

“Love them. My foot is healing and I upped my miles in these shoes—I liked the stability they provided. I put about 150 miles on theseand they still are wearing really well.”

Updates the Vectana • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7.5–13,14; Women5.5–12 • Weight: Men 14.0 oz. (size 11); Women 11.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, ld Cell Strobelboard

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2010

FALL 2010

BEST SHOEMotion

Stabilizing

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE BEST SHOEPerformance

Neutral

Neutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0FA L L 2 0 1 0

Fa ll 2 0 1 0 FA L L 2 0 1 0

Performance

MotioN StaBiLiZiNg

fall shoe review 2010:Spring Shoe Review 09 8/5/10 10:29 PM Page vi