Fake Writ, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell

8/9/2019 Fake Writ, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell

1/36

18


2/36

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUEADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL & JUDICIAL CRIMES

____________________________________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM order, DOC. # 49, 7/14/10

NOTICE OF RECORD THREATS, EXTORTION, AND CRIMES

BY DEFENDANT JUDICIAL WHORE CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL

NOTICE OF FAKE lien, FAKE 07/29/2009 judgment, CH. 55, FLA. STAT.,

FACIALLY FORGED judgment, AND FAKE writ of execution, DOC. ## 386-5, 425

PUBLISHED RECORD CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION & PERJURY PROOF

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM FRAUDULENT ORDER, DOC. # 49 FILED 07/14/10

WIRE FRAUD, THREATS, CORRUPTION, AND SILENCING BY DEF. HONEYWELL

1. Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently threatened and intimidated the

Plaintiff public corruption victims:


3/36

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs shallimmediately cease and desist sending correspondence to the chambers email

account of any judge and employee of this Court. Failure to comply with this

Order may result in the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11

and the inherent power of the Court, including but not limited to civil contempt

and monetary fines for each violation.

Here, Honeywells facially unlawful order, Doc. # 49, was deliberately vague and

ambiguous:

emails were discovered on July 5, 2010 and July 11, 2010.

Here, Honeywell failed to identify, e.g., the nature and content of the alleged e mails and

who had discovered the purported e mails when, where, why, and how. Therefore,

Honeywells orders were null and void and for unlawful and criminal purposes of obstructing

justice and thejust,speedy, and inexpensiveadjudication of Plaintiffs claims for relief under

the Rules.

PURPOSE OF DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELLS ORDER WAS ILLEGAL

2. Here, Defendant conflicted [28 U.S.C. 455; 28 U.S.C. 144] and crooked Judge Honeywells

record cover up and concealment of Government crimes on the record were no reasons

whatsoever to obstruct any perfectly legal and rightful correspondence. Here, Honeywell

again illegally coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecuting her and other Defendant

Government Officials and from engaging in absolutely necessary and lawful correspondence.

DEF. HONEYWELLS RECORD PARTIALITY AND INCOMPETENCE

3. Here, no fit, intelligent, and honest judge in Defendant Honeywells shoes could have

possiblynot disqualifiedherself in this Case after Def. Honeywells record recusal in Case

No. 2:2010-cv-00390. Just like a bungling Government idiot and crook, here Honeywell

resorted to facially criminal and unlawful tactics.

DEF. HONEYWELLS RECORD CONCESSION OF STATE RELIEF SOUGHT


4/36

3

4. Here again, Judicial Officer Honeywell deliberately deceived this Court:

In a prior case [removed from STATE Court] filed by the Plaintiffs, MagistrateJudge Mark Pizzo ordered Plaintiffs to cease and desist from sendingcorrespondence to the chambers email account of any judge or employee of this

Court (2:08-CV-899, Dkt. 52, p. 3, 5)(emphasis added); See also 2:08-cv-899, Dkt.76. See Doc. # 49.

5. Said Case No. 2:08-cv-00899 had been removed from STATE to this Court by Co-

Defendant Crooked Judges John E. Steele and S. Polster Chappell, who aftertheirremoval

fraudulently claimed that Plaintiffs had purportedly not pursuedSTATE remedies, which

was a self-evident perversion of the record and truth. To add injury to insult and judicial

crimes, judicial Defendant Mark Allan Pizzo conspired to fraudulently sanction the Plaintiffs

for their pleadings in STATE Court.

6. Here, Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that Defendant Judge Pizzo could not have

possiblysanctioned the Plaintiffs under FEDERAL R. Civ. P. 11 for Plaintiffs STATE

Court pleadings. Here, Defendant Honeywell further established herself as a judicial fool and

crook, who must be impeached under public policy to prevent further harm and injury to the

American people.

DEF. HONEYWELLS FRIVOLOUS AND UNSUPPORTED IDIOTIC ALLEGATIONS

7. Here frivolously, Defendant Honeywell rambled incomprehensibly about unidentified

behavior:

Consistent with behavior in this and related cases, Plaintiff Busse has directly violatedan order of this Court. See Doc. # 49, p. 2.

8. Here, Honeywell failed to explain and support whatbehavior could have possibly been a

direct violation? Since when is alleged correspondence a violation of what law or

rule? Why is alleged correspondence misconduct under what law and rule? How could

necessary correspondence violate any law or rule. Here again, Defendant Honeywell


5/36

4

utterly failed on the public record to support any misconduct and/or violation. Here

under color of office and non-existent authority, Defendant Honeywell unlawfully and

criminally interfered with proper procedure and used wires and multi state dissemination of

her record judicial trash, Doc. ## 48, 49, and other orders, to, e.g., perpetrate fraud on the

Court, extort, threaten, and coerce the Plaintiffs from further prosecution. Therefore,

Plaintiffs demand immediate disqualification of judicial whore C. E. Honeywell to which

the Plaintiffs have been absolutely entitled, 28 U.S.C. 144, 28 U.S.C. 455.

DEF. HONEYWELLS PERVERSION OF RULE 11

9. Here in particular, Honeywell has disrespected and perverted the law for criminal purposes of

delaying and obstructing justice under color of, e.g., fake land parcels and facially forged

resolution 569/875, and a fake judgment and writ of execution, which Honeywell knew

had neverexisted, and as a matter of law, could have neverpossibly transferred title to the

Defendants in State and Federal Courts.

EMERGENCY DEMAND FOR IMPARTIAL VENUE

10. Because the Plaintiffs have been forced to live in constant fear of Defendant Honeywells

illegal and criminal threats, punishment, sanctions, contempt threats, and fraudulent

allegations on the record, the Plaintiffs demand a different and hopefully impartial venue.

HONEYWELLS RECORD FAILURE TO STATE ANY GROUNDS

11. Like a bungling Government idiot, here Defendant Honeywell failed to present the legal

issue, the law, facts, application, and properconclusion. Therefore, Honeywells order was

deceptive, fraudulent, null and void, and for prima facie unlawful purposes of keeping the

Plaintiffs away from this Court.


6/36

5

PLAINTIFFS OBJECT TO HONEYWELLS NAZI TACTICS ON THE RECORD

12. The Plaintiffs expressly defend against Defendant Honeywells record Nazi tactics of

intimidation, harassment, and fraud on the Court.

EMERGENCY DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED E MAILS

13. The Plaintiff public corruption victims hereby demand full disclosure of the alleged e mails

so that the can be entered as evidence in the criminal and civil prosecution of Defendant C.

E. Honeywell.

DEF. HONEYWELL DEPRIVED PLAINTIFFS OF THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

14. The Plaintiffs have had fundamental rights to, e.g., own property, exclude Government,

redress their Government grievances and in particular be free from, e.g., the record

Government corruption, extortion, fraud, fraud on the Court by Defendant Corrupt Judge C.

E. Honeywell and other Defendants and Officials under color of facially forged land

parcels, and non-existent regulation, law, and resolution 569/875, a fraudulently

procured writ of execution, Doc. # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 and fake lien.

DEF. HONEYWELLS WANTON DISREGARD FOR THE LAW

15. As an Afro American Judge, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell exhibited wanton

disregard for Plaintiffs Constitutional and Civil Rights and deliberately disrespected the law.

Who the f does Defendant Honeywell believe she is to act just like a Nazi style judge and

display her well-proven ignorance and arrogance on the public record for the world to see?

DELIBERATE DENIAL OF EQUAL RIGHTS & EQUAL COURT ACCESS

16. Here, Plaintiffs had the equal rights of the Defendants to correspond under, e.g., the Rules

of Civil Procedure, and Local Rules of this Court. Therefore on its face, Honeywells order,

Doc. # 49, was intimidating and an unlawful threat to refrain from rightful prosecution and


7/36

6

blowing the whistle on Honeywells crimes of, e.g., fraudulent concealment, obstruction of

justice, and deliberate deprivations.

DEF. HONEYWELL EVADED RIGHTFUL PROSECUTION & CORRESPONDENCE

17. Here admittedly, Charlene E. Honeywell has been a named and served party Defendant, and

Honeywell had disqualified herself. See Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390. Therefore here,

Honeywell threatened and intimidated the Plaintiffs with punishment and sanctions.

DEF. HONEYWELLS FRAUD ON THE COURT & ILLEGAL SILENCING

18. Here for criminal and unlawful purposes of silencing and shutting up the Plaintiff

whistleblowers, covering up for other Defendants crimes of record, concealing, and

conspiring to conceal, e.g., fake land parcels, facially forged sham land claim O.R.

569/875, non-existent 07/29/09 judgment [see Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228], and a

fake lien [violative of Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.], Defendant Crooked Judge C. E. Honeywell made

unlawful orders, Doc. ## 48 and 49, without any authority whatsoever outside herjudicial

capacity.

DEF. HONEYWELL FABRICATED WRIT OF EXECUTION

19. Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed record absence of writ

of execution, record fake land parcels such as, e.g., 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0, and

facially forged resolution 569/875 [see Doc. ## 288, 282; Case No. 2:07-cv-00228, Lee

County PB 3 PG 25 (1912)]:

In the motion, Plaintiffs appear to seek a release of the writ of execution andattachment of a lien to property issued in Busse v. Lee County, Florida, et al., CaseNo. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-29SPC. That case was before [Defendant] Judge John Steeleand [Defendant] Magistrate Judge Sheri Chappell. See Doc. # 48.

20. Here in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Honeywell concealed and agreed to

conceal the stringent requirements of 55.10, Florida Statutes, and non-existence of any


8/36

7

lien. Here in particular, Def. Honeywell knew that admittedly Defendant K. M. Wilkinson

had never even fileda Rule 38 motion, Fed.R.App.P. 38, and that Appellate Case No.08-

13170-BB had been CLOSED on 06/11/2009. Here, Honeywells facially fraudulent

order, Doc. # 48, further proved Defendant Honeywells prima facie pattern and policy of

corruption, extortion, bribery, and case fixing outside any officialcapacity.

DEF. HONEYWELLS FALSE PRETENSES AND FABRICATION OF LIEN

21. Here in particular, Honeywell knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal with other Judges

and Defendants that a facially non-existent judgment could NOT havepossibly become a

lien on real property. See 55.10, Fla. Stat.

22. Here Def. Honeywell knew that fake resolution 569/875 and Def. Wilkinsons forged

land parcels had never existed, and that no valid writ of execution was ever executed

and/or witnessed by any identifiable judge. Here, no judgment existed on the Docket,

Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Document 425 Filed 02/02/10; see Doc. ## 288, 282.

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO EXTORT

23. Here, Defendant extortionist Honeywell conspired with other Judges, Officials, and

Defendants to extort Plaintiff corruption victims and whistleblowers property and fees

under color of, e.g., a facially forged resolution 569/875, fake land parcels, a non-

existent 07/29/09 judgment and a fake writ of execution. See Doc. ## 425, 288, 282, 386,

365, 432; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

EMERGENCY OF CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD PERJURY

24. Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and agreed to

conceal that Defendant JACK N. PETERSON had perjured himself, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228:


9/36

8

KENNETH M. WILKINSON, as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, is theholder of a judgment issued by the United States of Appeals in and for the EleventhCircuit on July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE inthe amount of $5,048.60.

Here, said Defendant Crooked Government Officials Honeywell, Wilkinson, and

Peterson conspired with other Defendants, Judges, and Officials to fraudulently conceal

the non-existent July 29, 2009 judgment and the non-existent lien. See Ch. 55,

Florida Statutes.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CLOSURE OF CASE # 08-13170-BB ON 06/11/2009

25. Here, said Defendants conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal that CASE

NO. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on June 11, 2009. See Appellate Docket on file.

11th Circuit Record and Exhibits had been RETURNED to this Court on 06/11/2009.

RECORD JUN 11 2009 BILL OF COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.30

26. The facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009 and received by the U.S.

District Court 2009 JUN 15 AM 11:20, Doc. # 365, was in the amount of$24.30, Doc. #

386, 386-3, 365; BILL OF COSTS issued on JUN 11 2009; 11th CIRCUIT FORM MISC-

12 (12/07).

27. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had neverclaimedmore than $24.30, and therefore under the

Rules, was never entitled to more than $24.30. See attached Fed. R. App. P. Here as a

matter of record, Defendant Wilkinson and/or his Attorney had sworn and/or affirmed

that the costs claimed were $24.30. See Doc. # 386-3; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

$24.30 WAS FINAL AMOUNT [FRAUDULENTLY ALLOWED]

28. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court

receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th Cir.

1987).


10/36

9

HONEYWELL CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CONCOCTION OF FAKE $5,048.60

29. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell concealed and agreed to conceal that Defendants

Peterson and Wilkinson had concocted an amount of $5,048.60. Plaintiff Government

corruption and crime victims sued Defendants KENNETH M. WILKINSON, JACK N.

PETERSON, and CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL in theirprivate individual capacities.

RECORD EXTORTION, PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD

30. Under color of non-existent authority, Lee County, Florida, Defendants and Officials

fabricated and conspired to fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and

07-44-21-01-00001.0000. See Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912).

CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL RECORD GOVERNMENT CRIMES

31. In these State and Federal Cases since 2006, Defendant U.S. Judges idiotically conspired

with other Officials to conceal the prima facie record forgeries of said non-existent land

parcels. See, e.g., record Transcript of corrupted proceedings before Defendant judicial

whore Sheri Polster Chappell in November 2007 on file; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

DEF. CROOK HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL 2006 STATE ACTION

32. Even though the State Court Judge himself was a Co-Defendant in this U.S. Court,

Defendant Corrupt Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed

Plaintiffs State Court action after said judicial Defendants themselves had removed

Plaintiffs legal action from State to Federal Court. See Case No. 2:2008-cv-00899 (BUSSE

v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Lee County Circuit Court; Def. Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.).

FACIALLY FRAUDULENT 03/05/09 judgment and 06/11/09 mandate

33. In its facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009, said 11th

Circuit

fraudulently pretended and fabricated on the record, Doc. ## 365; 386:


11/36

10

III. Since Busses takings claim was not ripe because he had notpursued available stateremedies and he failed to adequately plead his other federal claims Id.

Here as a matter of fact and record, Busse and Prescott had pursued available state

remedies in Lee County Circuit Court [removed to this Court: 2:2008-cv-00899],

adequately pleadedall their prima facie ripe federal claims, and demanded relief from said

facially fraudulent and corrupt Government determinations.

EMERGENCY OF DEFENDANTS CONCEALMENT OF REMOVED STATE ACTION

34. Here, Judges concealed and conspired to conceal Busses pursuit in State Courtand

Defendant Crooked Judge Steeles and Chappells removal from State to Federal Court. See

2006-CA-003185; Def. Judge Gerald, Lynn, Jr.; 2:2008-cv-00899 [removed].

EMERGENCY OF RECORD BRIBERY AND CASE FIXING

35. Here insanely, and in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Judicial Crooks Steele and

Chappell fraudulently and criminally pretended that Plaintiffs rights to own their real

property and exclude Government from their riparian Gulf-front street and up lands,

S.T.R.A.P # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), were purportedly not

fundamental rights. See brazen bribery and public corruption on the record!

DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO FABRICATE RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS

36. Furthermore here, Defendant judicial whore Honeywell knew and concealed that in

exchange for bribes, Defendants Steele and Chappell had conspired with other Defendants to

fabricate ripeness requirements under color of fake resolution 569/875. See Doc. # 338;

Fixed Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Doc. ## 213; 236; Fixed Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.

PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS SUED UNREPRESENTED DEF. HONEYWELL

37. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record landowners and public corruption victims sued

Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell in herprivate individual capacity, because her


12/36

11

purported orders were outside any immunity and scope ofofficialacts. See Docket 2:2010-

cv-00390.

38. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell had admitted to having been served and

disqualified herself. See Doc. # 3; 06/22/2010; Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390.

39. Idiotically, the Court then reassigned the Case to Co-Defendant Crooked Judge John Edwin

Steele. See Doc. # 4, 06/22/2010.

40. Here, no notice of appearance was filed on behalf of said Defendant Corrupt Judge

Honeywell. See Docket, Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390; 07/14/2009, 19:43:47.

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AGREED TO CONCEAL FORGED LAND PARCELS

41. Judges, Defendants, and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that said facially forged

parcels had neverexistednor been legally described, conveyed, andplatted. See 1912 Plat

of Survey of private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County PB 3 PG 25.

FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF 07/292009 judgment

42. Defendant crooked Officials Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson fraudulently

pretended:

11. A certified copy of the [07/29/09] judgment has been recorded in the PublicRecords of Lee County, Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as alien against the property. See Doc. # 386, p. 3, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

Here, the non-existentjudgmentdid notserveasany lien. See Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.

43. Here, the Clerk of this U.S. District Court and custodian of said Courts records could not

authenticate the fraudulently pretended 07/29/2009 judgment, because said Clerk never

received any 07/29/2009 judgment. Here, the Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, was

devoid of any 07/29/09 judgment. See authenticated Docket on file.

44. Here, Def. U.S. Judges, Government Officials, and the other Defendants knew and agreed to

conceal that this Court had no power whatsoever to enforce a non-existentjudgment.


13/36

12

DEF. WILKINSON FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2

45. Defendant Crooked Official Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged, e.g., land parcels, and

maps. Here, Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court and facially forged a

judgment. See Doc. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2. The smaller font size of the page number 2 did

not match font size 14 of the text. The facially forged judgment was not, and could not

possibly have been, a true copy. See Exhibit below. The facially forged and pasted

judgment copy did not comply with 55.10, Fla. Stat. E.g., said fake did not contain any

address.

46. In Doc. # 432, p. 3 of 7, Defendant Wilkinson had asserted:

On February 2, 2010, the Clerk of this Court issued a Writ of Execution (D.E. 425).

47. Here, said Clerk knew that no such judgment had ever been receivedfrom the Circuit Clerk

and that no 07/29/2010 judgment appeared on the Docket, Case # 2:2007-cv-00228.

HONEYWELL CONCEALED THAT FAKE WRIT WAS VOID & NEVER WITNESSED

48. Here, Doc. # 425 Filed 02/02/10 materially misrepresented in the record absence of any

identifiable judge:

you cause to be made and levied as well a certain debt of:$Five thousand Forty-Eight AND Sixty Centsin the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, before the Judgeof the said Court by the consideration of the same Judge lately recovered against thesaid, Jorg Busse Witness the Honorable [United States Judge] ____ [blank]

Here on its face, the fraudulent writ of execution did not identify any judge and was

null and void. In particular, Witness the Honorable ___ was blank. See Doc. # 425.

DEF. WILKINSON EXTORTED MONEY AND PROPERTY

49. Defendant Wilkinson extorted fees and property by fraudulently pretending:

4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule 27-4, requesting an order awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $5,000,


14/36

13

double costs and such other relief as the Court deemed appropriate for defendantAppellants frivolous appeal. See Doc. # 432, p. 2.

Here, Def. Wilkinson again deceived the Court, because Jorg Busse had been the Plaintiff

[and not the defendant] and Wilkinson had admittedly neverfiledany Rule 38 motion.

50. Fed.R.App.P. 27-4 states:

Repy to Response. Any reply to a response must be filed within 7 days after serviceof the response. A reply must not present matters that do not relate to the response.

Here, Def. Wilkinsons pleading(s) and brief had been without legal meritand could not be

supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing

law, or the establishment of new law. In addition, Def. Wilkinsons pleadings contained

assertions of material facts that were patently clearly false and unsupported by the record,

O.R. 569/875 In particular, prima facie sham claim O.R. 569/875 was not any

regulation, legislative act, resolution, or law and as a matter of law, could not have

possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs expressly stated will. Here,

the Plaintiffs had defended their unimpeachable record title against any condemnation and

refused to exchange their perfected title just because corrupt Government Officials, e.g.,

threatened, harassed, defrauded, and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their

fundamental rights to own property, exclude Government(s), redress their grievances of no

due process and no equal protection, and have ajury trial.

51. Here, no accounting whatsoever, and none was ever provided as required, could have

possiblyexplained and/orjustifiedthe fraudulent amount of $5,048.60 under the Rules.

Here, presentingor opposing Plaintiff(s) conclusive record evidence of Def. Wilkinsons

fraud, extortion, corruption on the record did not, and could not, possibly have incurred

5,048.60 according to the Rule.


15/36

14

WILKINSON FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED REGULATORY TAKING

IN THE PRIMA FACIE RECORD ABSENCE OF ANYREGULATION:

HOW FRIVOLOUS WAS THAT?

52. Therefore here, Defendant Wilkinsons assertion of a regulatory taking was on its face

frivolous, deceptive, and fraudulent. Furthermore, Defendant Wilkinson presented his

pleadings and brief for the improper and illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting fees and property

from the Plaintiff public corruption victims, coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further

prosecution, fraudulently concealing forged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0

and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000, extending and conspiring to extend extortion and fraud

scheme O.R. 569/875, obstructing justice and just speedy adjudication of Plaintiffs

claims for relief, harassing the Plaintiffs, and causing unnecessary delay and needless

increase in the cost of litigation since 2006 in State and Federal Courts over one single piece

of trash paper: facially null and void O.R. 569/875.

53. Therefore here admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion, never

allegeda frivolous appeal, and neverdemanded any Rule 38 relief.

UPDATED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

54. Plaintiff public corruption victims filed another updated Criminal Complaint in this matter

with State and Federal law enforcement.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand

1. An EMERGENCY Orderstriking Honeywells order, Doc. # 49, as facially unlawful and

for criminal purposes of coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further prosecution and

extorting fees and property under color of, e.g., forged land claim O.R. 569/875 and a

non-existent writ of execution and lien, violative of Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.;


16/36

15

2. An EMERGENCY Orderremoving Honeywell as objectively unfit and crooked under 28

U.S.C. 144, AND 28 U.S.C. 455;

3. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywells record

EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under color ofauthority and prima facie scam O.R.

569/875, said fake lien, fake 07/29/09 judgment, and fake writ of execution, 55.10,

Ch. 55, 56, Fla. Stat.;

4. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record judicial EXTORTION and

CORRUPTION under color of non-existent O.R. 569/875, resolution 569/875, and

fraudulent regulatory taking pretenses, because as a matter of law, no law or

resolution, whatsoever, could have possibly alienatedPlaintiffs record property against

their will;

5. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION and

embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a lien and public land claim

[see, e.g., Doc. ## 213; 214; 212, Case No. 2:09-cv-00791; and Case No. 2:07-cv-00228,

Doc. ## 288, 282, 425, 386, 365].

6. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining Def. objectively partial/crooked Judge Honeywell, and

Defendants Jack N. Peterson, and Kenneth M. Wilkinson from perverting the record &

concealing Plaintiffs record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912);

7. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and

proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 48, 49; and Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214, Case

No. 2:09-cv-00791 at the dirty hands of Def. judicial whore Honeywell for said well-proven

reasons;


17/36

16

8. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their

State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;

9. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not fabricate a lien and did not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs record ownership of said

Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs Complaint and

pleadings;


not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;


not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record ownership by the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.

Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);


not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11 th

Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;

13. An Ordercompelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her rulings were not

NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false frivolity and

vexatiousness pretenses and the concealment of said fake legal descriptions, fake land

parcels, and fake Government ownership claims and contentions;

14. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she

disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the


18/36

17

facts of record, and could notpossibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. 455; 28

U.S.C. 144.

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro seP.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295____________________________________/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.

Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro seState Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;[email protected]


19/36

19


20/36

20

Def. Crooked Honeywells Real Estate Fraud:

Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:

o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;

Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block

00001ever existed.

Fake Government ownership claims;

Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.

569/875; Fake resolution and law claims;

Fake land parcels;

Fake frivolity defenses;

Fake vexatiousness contentions;

Fake legal descriptions:


21/36


22/36

22


23/36

23


24/36

24


25/36

25


26/36

26


27/36

27


28/36

28


29/36

29


30/36

30


31/36


32/36

32


33/36

33


34/36

34


35/36

35


36/36

Fake Writ, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell

Documents

Transcript of Fake Writ, Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell