FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page...

109
LOWER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION MAUD ABRAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 714 Town Bank Road Cape May, New Jersey 08204 FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Transcript of FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page...

Page 1: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

LOWER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION

MAUD ABRAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

714 Town Bank Road Cape May, New Jersey 08204

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 2: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 1 of 51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) .......................................................................... 7 

III.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 9 

IV.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 13 

V.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 14 

VI.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 51 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Window Savings Analysis

Page 3: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Atlantic City Electric Electric Utility Rate Structure: Monthly General Service, (Secondary)

Street and Private Lighting Third Party Supplier: Liberty Power Holdings, LLC Power Purchase Provider: Marina Energy, LLC PPA Rate Structure: Annual Fixed Price per kWh PPA Energy Source: Onsite Solar Natural Gas Utility Provider: South Jersey Gas Company Utility Rate Structure: General Service FT Third Party Supplier: Sprague Energy The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. Lower Township Schools entered into a Power Purchase Agreement to purchase electric supply generated by an onsite solar array. Lower Township Schools is responsible for purchasing all of the power generated by the system at a fixed price per kilowatt-hours (KWH). New Jersey’s net metering guidelines allow them to get an on bill credit for exported KWH, to be utilized in the months to follow, up until the annual balance date when any remaining credit of KWH is paid to the owner based on average electric market pricing for the year. The Electric Billing Data summarized reflects the net electric used by the facility based on utility purchased electric and onsite solar. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 4: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 3 of 51

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Atlantic City ElectricRate: Monthly General Service (Secondary)

Meter No: 0105147-9999-7, 0105147-9998-9Account No: 5500 5847 755, 5500 5847 367, 0105 1479 9997, 5500 7672 284

Third Party Utility Liberty Power Holdings, LLCTPS Meter / Acct No: 0550 0584 7755 7000 0256 67, 0550 0584 7367 7000 8796 69

0105 1479 9997, 0550 0767 2284 7001 0411 57

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL

Jun-14 75,174 $8,608

Jul-14 76,817 $7,441

Aug-14 73,293 $7,063

Sep-14 74,362 $8,483

Oct-14 68,612 $6,841

Nov-14 28,030 $4,063

Dec-14 65,504 $3,465

Jan-15 47,504 $5,334

Feb-15 52,931 $5,950

Mar-15 91,402 $11,459

Apr-15 65,628 $6,807

May-15 76,779 $7,179

Totals 796,036 259.8 Max $82,692

AVERAGE DEMAND 140.9 KW average

AVERAGE RATE $0.104 $/kWh

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

83.5

159.1

102.9

DEMAND KW

114.2

129.5

229.4

81.3

168.6

204.1

75.2

83.6

259.8

Page 5: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 4 of 51

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

0.0

50.0

100.

0

150.

0

200.

0

250.

0

300.

0

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

80,0

00

90,0

00

100,

000

Usage (kWh)

Mon

th

Mau

d A

bra

ms

Sch

ool

Ele

ctri

c U

sage

Pro

file

Ju

ne-

14 t

hro

ugh

May

-15

EL

EC

TR

IC U

SA

GE

KW

H

DE

MA

ND

KW

Page 6: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 5 of 51

Table 2 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: South Jersey Gas CompanyRate: General Service FT

Meter No: 4-19-55-0022-1-1Account No: 4234340000

Third Party Utility Provider: Sprague EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

(THERMS)TOTAL BILL

Apr-14 3,785.00 $4,144.48

May-14 2,315.00 $2,547.50

Jun-14 205.00 $336.49

Jul-14 97.00 $138.57

Aug-14 87.00 $125.62

Sep-14 131.00 $158.86

Oct-14 184.00 $399.48

Nov-14 2,107.00 $2,433.75

Dec-14 5,117.00 $5,650.19

Jan-15 7,964.00 $8,748.48

Feb-15 8,638.00 $10,427.82

Mar-15 7,199.00 $8,357.75

TOTALS 37,829.00 $43,468.99

AVERAGE RATE: $1.15 $/THERM

209663

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 7: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 6 of 51

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

0

1,00

0

2,00

0

3,00

0

4,00

0

5,00

0

6,00

0

7,00

0

8,00

0

9,00

0

10,0

00

Usage (Therms)

Mon

th

Mau

d A

bra

ms

Sch

ool

Gas

Usa

ge P

rofi

le

Ap

ril-

14 t

hro

ugh

Mar

ch-1

5

Gas

Usa

ge

Page 8: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 7 of 51

II. FACILITY ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. Building Benchmarking data is collected and analyzed within the Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), performed by the Energy and Information Administration (EIA). Building data is grouped by function types and tabulated, from which a median site and source energy intensity is determined. The national median or PEER Group Comparable in this instance is the middle value of the national population meaning half the buildings use more energy, and half use less. The PEER Group EUI allows us to compare the relative efficiency of the audited building to that of an average building with the same or similar primary function (i.e. group type). Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

BuildingSiteEUIElectricUsageinkBtu FuelUsageinkBtu

BuildingSquareFootage

BuildingSourceEUIElectricUsageinkBtu SSRatio FuelUsageinkBtu SSRatio

BuildingSquareFootage

Page 9: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 8 of 51

Table 3 Energy Use Index Summary

The inclusion of Solar Energy at a Site Source Ratio of 1.0 affects the Source Energy PEER Comparison most favorably by eliminating Electric energy at a 3.14 ratio and replacing it with Solar Energy at a 1.0 ratio. Although the PEER Comparison is based on Source Energy, it would seem more appropriate to gauge the energy usage of this school using Site Energy. On this basis the Building Site EUI is 90% Less Efficient than PEER Comparison, except that is utilizes Solar Energy as a renewable fuel.

kWh Therms Gallons kBtu kBtu

ELECTRIC 254,738.0 869,676 3.140 2,730,781

NATURAL GAS 37,829.0 3,782,900 1.050 3,972,045

SOLAR 541,298.0 1,847,991 1.000 1,847,991

TOTAL 6,500,567 8,550,818

BUILDING TYPE

BUILDING AREA 58,639 SQUARE FEET

BUILDING SITE EUI 110.86 kBtu/SF/YR 58.2 kBtu/SF/YR

BUILDING SOURCE EUI 145.82 kBtu/SF/YR 141.4 kBtu/SF/YR

3%

ENERGY USE INTENSITY CALCULATION

ENERGY TYPEBUILDING USE

SITE ENERGY

SITE-SOURCE RATIO

SOURCE ENERGY

*Site - Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document.

AUDITED BUILDING PEER COMPARISON

K-12 School K-12 School

Less Efficient than PEER Comparison

Page 10: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 9 of 51

III. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Maud Abrams School is located at 714 Town Bank Road in Cape May, New Jersey. This 58,639 SF facility was originally built in 1966 with additions in 1971 and 1994. The original school is now called the A, B and C Wings, with the first addition being the D Wing and the final addition the E Wing. The school facility is single story and is comprised if classrooms, library, multi-purpose room, computer lab, administration and nurse’s offices and kitchen.

Occupancy Profile

The school is dedicated to third and fourth grade students and holds it classes from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., 5 days a week, however teachers and staff stay after these hours. There are approximately 474 students and 41 teachers and administrative staff at the school.

Building Envelope

Exterior walls for the building are masonry brick faced with a concrete block construction. The windows throughout the facility are in average to good condition. Except for the and E Wings which are double pane, all windows in the building are single pane glass with aluminum frame and translucent colored plastic panels in the upper sections to reduce solar gain. The roof is mostly a 1” stone ballast roof with insulation covered by a rubber membrane. The balance of the roofing, Wings B and E, is insulated roof covered by a rubber membrane without the stone ballast.

The Maud Abrams School operates at a considerably higher Energy Use Index (EUI) than the national average and the other Lower Township Schools. One reason for this is the large number of single pane glass windows at the school which allow for greater heat losses in the winter and heat gain in the summer. Concord Engineering is recommending a lower cost improvement of high performance window film to reduce winter losses and summer gains. However Lower Township Schools may want to consider a full window replacement to further reduce the overall energy consumption of the school.

HVAC Systems

The Maud Abrams School is conditioned primarily by a heating hot water distributed to classroom unit ventilators, and a combination of ductless mini-splits and rooftop DX units, with electric unit ventilators heating the D Wing and gas rooftop units heating the E Wing. There are seventeen (17) Nesbitt 4-fan and one (1) Nesbitt 2-fan hot water unit ventilators. Additionally there are eight (8) Nesbitt electric unit ventilators in the D Wing and thirteen (13) Nesbitt hot water ceiling ventilators located near entry doors throughout the building.

The boiler room has two (2) natural gas modular boilers, each with three (3) sections rated at 500 MBH of gas input. This make the size of the heating plant 3,000 MBH input in total. Two (2) base-mounted, Armstrong Model 826768-000, 5-hp pumps with 1,755 rpm Weg motors rated at 87.5 percent efficiency circulate the heating hot water to the building unit and ceiling ventilators

Page 11: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 10 of 51

at constant flow and 180 degree temperature throughout the heating season, which typically runs from October to May.

In the A, B and C Wings there are typically two ductless mini-split units per classroom, alternating in use from year to year. Thirty-one (31) 2-ton mini-split condensers are located on the roof and nineteen (19) 1-1/2 to 3-ton condensing units are located on the ground around the perimeter of the building. Of the rooftop mini-split units, nineteen (19) are heat pump, Model AOU24R1A, and twelve (12) are air conditioning, Model AOU24C3, rated at 10.3 and 10.5 EER respectively. Of the ground mini-split unit heat pumps, eleven (11) are 2-ton, EER 10.5, Model AOU24R1A, and one (1) is 1-1/2 ton, EER 12.5, Model AOU18RLXFZ. Of the ground mini-split air conditioners, six (6) are 2-ton, 10.5 EER, Model AOU24C3 and one (1) is 3-ton, 9.39 EER, Model AOU36CX.

Rooftop Units are located to serve primarily the Wings D and E of the facility, however there are also four (4) rooftop units which serve the Multi-Purpose Room, one (1) that serves the Library one (1) that serves the Kitchen and one that serves the Stage. The Multi-Purpose room air conditioning units are Inter-City Products, Model RAS091LAA0AAAA, are 7-1/2 tons each in capacity, 13 SEER efficiency, with a 2 hp constant volume supply air fan, no heat, and are four (4) years old. The Library heat pump unit is a York, Model B3CH036A258, 3 tons in capacity, 10 SEER efficiency, with a 3/4 hp constant volume supply air fan, 39 MBH in heating capacity and twenty-one (21) years in age. The Kitchen rooftop unit nameplate could not be read, other than that it is a 23 year old unit with natural gas heat. Finally the stage air conditioning unit is Inter-City Products, Model PAF024K0000A, is 2 tons in capacity, 10 SEER efficiency, with a 1/4 hp supply air fan, no heat, and is fifteen (15) years old.

The D Wing roof has five (5) rooftop York heat pumps, Model B3CH048A258, each 4 tons in cooling capacity, 48 MBH in heating capacity, 10.2 EER and 3.0/2.0 COP in efficiency, with 3/4 hp supply air fans and twenty-one (21) years in age. The same D Wing also has four (4) natural gas heat rooftop units. Two (2) classroom units are York, Model D3NZ030D05606C, 2-1/2 tons in cooling capacity, 70 MBH in gas heating input, 13.2 SEER, with 3/4 hp supply air fans and are three (3) years old. The third classroom rooftop unit is a Lennox, Model TGA048B2DH1Y, 4 tons in cooling capacity, 150 MBH in gas heating input, 10 SEER, with a 1/2 hp supply air fan and seven (7) years in age. Finally the D Wing also has a hallway rooftop unit, Carrier Model 48TCEA05A2A5A0A0A0, 4 tons in cooling capacity, 115 MBH in gas heating input, 13 SEER and 81% efficient, with a 2 hp constant volume supply air fan, and is three (3) years old.

Similarly the E Wing has five (5) natural gas rooftop units, Trane Model YCD048C3L0BF, each 4 tons in cooling capacity, 90 MBH in heating gas input, 10.1 SEER efficiency with a 1/2 hp supply air fan and fourteen (14) years in age.

Most of the assorted ductless split systems and rooftop units are 14 to 21 years old and are reaching the end of their useful life. Maintenance personnel have indicated that it is impossible to get replacement parts for the ductless split system units when they need repair. As or before these units begin to fail and require regular repair Concord Engineering recommends replacing these mini-split system and rooftop units with new, high-efficiency variable ductless mini-split and standard split systems. Alternatively a VRF system could be designed to heat, cool and ventilate these spaces, however at a less than favorable economic payback period.

Page 12: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 11 of 51

Exhaust System

The school facility contains numerous small exhaust fans located on the roof which exhaust air from the hallways, restrooms and several classrooms. Timers turn the hallway fans on at 7 a.m. in the morning and off at 10 p.m. in the evening. Restroom fans are controlled by the light switches. Two (2) of the hallway exhaust fans are larger in size having motors of 1-1/2 and 3 hp. HVAC System Controls

The building is without an energy management system (EMS) and is controlled by individual space thermostats. The thermostats are programmed to maintain occupied and unoccupied space temperatures according to a temperature setting schedule used in all of the Township schools. Thermostat programming allows the teachers and custodians to reset the temperature settings by approximately 2 degrees upwards or downwards. Summer daytime temperatures were observed to be between 65 and 74 degrees, mostly around 70 degrees, in most classrooms even when unoccupied.

The ductless mini-split units are controlled in each classroom by timers to turn them on from 7:30 to 8:00 in the morning and turn them off at 8:30 to 9:00 after the cleaning crews have left for the evening. In the summer the building is left to run at approximately 72 degrees day and night to prevent the build-up of high humidity levels in the school which might promote the growth of mold and mildew.

The Maud Abrams School operates at a considerably higher Energy Use Index (EUI) than the national average and the other Lower Township Schools. Yet the building systems seem very similar to the other schools which operate at much lower values. Typically this would mean that the building is operating longer hours or the thermostats are not being set back as would normally be done.

The boiler hot water system operates manually with the heating hot water set point at 180 degrees F throughout the heating season.

Domestic Cold Water

Lavatory aerators are at least 2.0 gpm in flow, urinals are approximately 0.5 gallons per flush and water closets are 1.6 gallons per flush. There are also five (5) water coolers in the building. Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water for the facility is provided by two (2) storage tank water heaters and thirteen (13) point-of-use electric water heaters, which are located in classroom restrooms and a storage closet. The building’s main water heater serving the kitchen is located in the boiler room. It is American, Model CG2100T004N, 100 gallon, 80 MBH gas water heater operating at 80 percent efficiency and three (3) years in age. The second tank heater is American, Model 82-80H-450V, 80 gallons in size, 4.5 kW in electric heating capacity and is fourteen (14) years in age. The

Page 13: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 12 of 51

tankless point-of-use water heaters are primarily Ariston, Eemax and Titan, all electric heat typically having capacities of 1.35 to 1.5 kW.

Kitchen Equipment

The kitchen equipment at the facility contains a walk-in refrigeration box and a walk-in freezer box. There are natural gas-fired convection ovens, griddle and a kettle. Electrical kitchen equipment includes reach-in refrigerators and coolers, warming cabinets and tables, a steamer, a dishwasher and electric booster heater with 15 kW of electric heat.

Additionally the Teacher’s Lounges include several refrigerators, microwave ovens, an electric range which is not used, and two refrigerated vending machines.

Laundry Equipment

Adjacent to the kitchen is a small room with a Kenmore large capacity front load washer and dryer.

Lighting

Refer to the Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space. Solar Energy The school has a large solar array located on the grounds adjacent to the building which provides for approximately 68 percent of its annual electric usage. Significant reductions can still be made to the school’s electric use before the school district would have to sell its solar energy generation back to the electric utility at a less than favorable discount rate.

Page 14: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 13 of 51

IV. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 15: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 14 of 51

V. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ECM #1 Indoor Lighting $83,826 $9,962 8.4 78.3%

ECM #2 LED Exterior Lighting $6,303 $1,531 4.1 264.4%

ECM #3 Lighting Controls $5,560 $487 11.4 57.7%

ECM #4 Bi-Level Lighting in Hallways $3,750 $290 12.9 39.2%

ECM #5 Vending Miser $428 $416 1.0 1649.5%

ECM #6 High Efficiency Rooftop Units $62,546 $2,360 26.5 -43.4%

ECM #7High Efficient Ductless Mini-

Splits $302,479 $7,503 40.3 -62.8%

ECM #8VFD on Hot Water Pumps

with 2-Way Valves$16,622 $2,288 7.3 106.5%

ECM #9 Hot Water Reset $3,000 $4,350 0.7 2075.0%

ECM #10 Window Film $15,552 $1,843 8.4 77.8%

ECM #11Gas Kitchen Dishwasher

Heater$5,500 $371 14.8 1.2%

ECM #12 Water Conservation $1,689 $1,919 0.9 1036.2%

ECM #13 Energy Management System $175,917 $4,336 40.6 -63.0%

Notes:

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

ANNUAL

SAVINGSB

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONSIMPLE

PAYBACK (Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

Page 16: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 15 of 51

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Indoor Lighting 41.9 77,528 0

ECM #2 LED Exterior Lighting 3.1 9,167 0

ECM #3 Lighting Controls 0.0 4,683 0

ECM #4 Bi-Level Lighting in Hallways 0.0 2,790 0

ECM #5 Vending Miser 0.0 3,997 0

ECM #6 High Efficiency Rooftop Units 28.4 22,693 0

ECM #7High Efficient Ductless Mini-

Splits 35.6 -99,316 15,506

ECM #8VFD on Hot Water Pumps

with 2-Way Valves0.0 21,996 0

ECM #9 Hot Water Reset 0.0 0 3,783

ECM #10 Window Film 5.0 9,087 780

ECM #11Gas Kitchen Dishwasher

Heater5.0 8,045 -343

ECM #12 Water Conservation 0.0 9,149 14

ECM #13 Energy Management System 0.0 19,105 2,043

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 17: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 16 of 51

Table 3 ECM Emissions Summary

ECM #1 Indoor Lighting 117,843 217 504

ECM #2 LED Exterior Lighting 13,934 26 60

ECM #3 Lighting Controls 7,118 13 30

ECM #4 Bi-Level Lighting in Hallways 4,241 8 18

ECM #5 Vending Miser 6,075 11 26

ECM #6 High Efficiency Rooftop Units 34,493 64 148

ECM #7High Efficient Ductless Mini-

Splits 30,460 (135) (646)

ECM #8VFD on Hot Water Pumps

with 2-Way Valves33,434 62 143

ECM #9 Hot Water Reset 44,261 35 0

ECM #10 Window Film 22,938 33 59

ECM #11Gas Kitchen Dishwasher

Heater8,215 19 52

ECM #12 Water Conservation 14,070 26 59

ECM #13 Energy Management System 52,943 72 124

Total Emissions Savings 390,026 449 578

Notes: A. Emissions Reduction based on NJCEP published factors for electric & gas.

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION

CO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

NOX

EMISSIONS (LBS)

SO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

Page 18: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 17 of 51

Table 4 Facility Project Summary

Note the measure totals in this table do not take into account interactive effects of measures; see Method of Analysis Section III in Executive Report for further explanation. The facility peak electrical demand and total project savings meet the qualifications for the Pay for Performance Program. If the owner were to pursue this program option they would receive an estimated $62,575 in incentive dollars, see the Installation Funding Options Section for more detail.

Indoor Lighting $9,962 $94,821 $10,995 $83,826 8.4

LED Exterior Lighting $1,531 $9,063 $2,760 $6,303 4.1

Lighting Controls $487 $5,650 $90 $5,560 11.4

Bi-Level Lighting in Hallways

$290 $3,750 $0 $3,750 12.9

Vending Miser $416 $428 $0 $428 1.0

High Efficiency Rooftop Units

$2,360 $64,800 $2,254 $62,546 26.5

High Efficient Ductless Mini-Splits

$7,503 $311,725 $9,246 $302,479 40.3

VFD on Hot Water Pumps with 2-Way Valves

$2,288 $16,622 $0 $16,622 7.3

Hot Water Reset $4,350 $3,000 $0 $3,000 0.7

Window Film $1,843 $15,552 $0 $15,552 8.4

Gas Kitchen Dishwasher Heater

$371 $5,500 $0 $5,500 14.8

Water Conservation $1,919 $1,689 $0 $1,689 0.9

Energy Management System $4,336 $175,917 $0 $175,917 40.6

Total Project $37,656 $708,517 $25,345 $683,172 18.1

FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES

Page 19: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 18 of 51

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout the Maud Abrams School are fluorescent fixtures, four foot, two, three and four lamps, 32W T8 with electronic ballasts; U-tube, two lamp 32 W T8 fixtures; and four foot, two and four lamp 34 W T12 lamps with electronic ballasts. This ECM includes replacing and retrofitting the interior lighting with new LED type lamps and ballasts. It is recommended Lower Township Schools consult with a professional engineer prior to retrofitting or replacing fixtures to ensure code required minimum light levels will be met. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building.

Maintenance Savings & Project Costs: Lamp and ballast maintenance cost savings of the existing lighting fixtures were estimated for this measure and are listed above. Savings are based on maintenance replacement costs (T&M) of existing T8 and T12 lamps at $5.00 per lamp, ballast replacement costs of $25.00 per ballast, lamp life of 24,000 hours and ballast life of 50,000 hours, compared to LED lamps with a life of 100,000 hours operating without ballasts. Project costs are estimated based on RS Means Unit Cost Data and Vendor Quotes.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 41.9Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 77,528Electric Cost Savings ($) $8,063Annual Maintenance Savings ($) $1,899

LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 20: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 19 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $94,821

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $10,995

Net Installation Cost ($): $83,826

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $1,899

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $8,063

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $9,962

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 8.4

Simple Lifetime ROI 78.3%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $28,485

Simple Lifetime Savings $149,430

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 8%

Net Present Value (NPV) $35,099.71

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 21: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 20 of 51

ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade –LED Exterior Fixtures Description: Exterior lighting at Maud Abrams School are high intensity discharge surface and wall mount fixtures and a few surface and wall mounted flood incandescent fixtures. This ECM includes re-lamping or replacement of existing fixtures with new higher efficiency LED lighting that requires a lower energy use for the same light output. If re-lamping is recommended, fixture lenses should be cleaned or replaced as some of the existing lenses are discolored and brittle after years of being exposed to the elements. Exterior lighting is controlled via time clock and typically operates from dusk to dawn or less. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building.

Replacement and Maintenance Savings: Lamp and ballast maintenance cost savings of the existing lighting fixtures were estimated for this measure and are listed above. Savings are based on maintenance replacement costs (T&M) of existing halogen and incandescent lamps at $3.00 per lamp, HID lamp replacement costs of $100.00 per lamp, with lamp life of 1,000 hours and 18,000 hours respectively, compared to LED lamps with a life of 100,000 hours.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 3.1Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 9,167Electric Cost Savings ($) $953Annual Maintenance Savings ($) $578

LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 22: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 21 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $9,063

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $2,760

Net Installation Cost ($): $6,303

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $578

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $953

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,531

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 4.1

Simple Lifetime ROI 264.4%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $8,670

Simple Lifetime Savings $22,965

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 23%

Net Present Value (NPV) $11,973.98

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 23: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 22 of 51

ECM #3: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: The school does not utilize occupancy sensors to control the operation of lights. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM are primarily for restrooms, which are generally unoccupied, and are estimated to be 35% of the total light energy. (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on.) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for bathrooms, teacher’s lounges and the multi-purpose room. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy

kWh

$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 24: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 23 of 51

Rebates and Incentives:

From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: SmartStartIncentive

#Wallmountsensors $20persensor#Ceilingmountsensors $35persensor

Energy Savings Summary:

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 0.0Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 4,683Electric Cost Savings ($) $487Annual Maintenance Savings ($) $0

LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS SUMMARY

Installation Cost ($): $5,650

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $90

Net Installation Cost ($): $5,560

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $487

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $487

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 18

Simple Payback 11.4

Simple Lifetime ROI 57.7%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $8,766

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 5%

Net Present Value (NPV) $1,137.96

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 25: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 24 of 51

ECM #4: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Bi-Level Lighting in Hallways Description: It was noticed during the field audit that the hallway lighting could be switched to half levels, or every other fixture, by turning on only one of the two light switches in the hallway. During the summer and even during the school year the halls are more often vacant than not and the hallway lighting levels could safely be maintained at 50 percent until someone walks into the hallway.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Occupancy sensors made specifically for corridors will detect motion and will switch the lights on when the hallway is occupied. These occupancy sensors are ceiling mounted to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for hallway lighting controls are estimated to be 25% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors. This ECM includes installation of ceiling mount sensors for the hallways. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy

kWh

$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 26: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 25 of 51

Rebates and Incentives:

The NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives do not apply to hallway lighting. Energy Savings Summary:

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 0.0Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 2,790Electric Cost Savings ($) $290Annual Maintenance Savings ($) $0

LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS SUMMARY

Installation Cost ($): $3,750

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $3,750

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $290

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $290

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 18

Simple Payback 12.9

Simple Lifetime ROI 39.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $5,220

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 4%

Net Present Value (NPV) $238.52

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 27: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 26 of 51

ECM #5: Vending Miser Controls Description: The Maud Abrams School currently utilizes two (2) refrigerated cold beverage vending machines in the teacher’s lounge. Vending machines are common within faculty rooms which can be in use for a limited time during the day. The installation of the Vending Miser system will help reduce the operating hours of vending machines. Cold beverage machines regularly operate inefficiently trying to maintain a constant cool temperature within the machine with no cooling usually have lights that operate 24/7. The VendingMiser® system incorporates innovative energy-saving technology into a small plug-and-play device that in conjunction with a passive infrared sensor regulate the operation of the cold beverage machines based on occupancy and room temperature. This ECM approximates the energy savings from the installation of two (2) Vending Miser systems for the cold beverage machine. Energy Savings Calculations: Calculations are based manufacturer’s analysis tool.

Energy Analysis Prepared For: Energy Costs ($0.000 per kwh) $0.104Facility Occupied Hours per Week 60

Maud Abrams School Number of Cold Drink Vending Machines 2Number of Uncooled Snack Machines 0

www.VendingMiserStore.com Power Requirements of Cold Drink Machine (avg watts) 427Power Requirements of Snack Machine (avg watts) 100VendingMiser Sa le Price (for cold drink machines) $214.00OfficeMiser Sa le Price (for snack machines) $0.00

Savings AnalysisBefore Afte r

Cold Drink Machines $778.56 $362.90 Cost of Opera tion

7,486 3,489 kWh

53% % Energy Savings

Snack Machines $0.00 $0.00 Cost of Opera tion0 0 kWh

0% % Energy Savings

Project Summary

Present kWh Projected kWhkWh Savings

per Year7,486 3,489 3,997

Present CostProjected

CostsAnnua l

SavingsPer Cent Savings T ota l Project Cost

Break Even (Months)

$778.56 $362.90 $415.66 53% $428.00 12.4

Input Variables

Cold Drink and Snack Vending Machine Energy Conservation

Page 28: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 27 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $428

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $428

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $416

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $416

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 18

Simple Payback 1.0

Simple Lifetime ROI 1649.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $7,488

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 97%

Net Present Value (NPV) $5,293.46

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 29: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 28 of 51

ECM #6: Replace Rooftop Units with High Efficiency Units

Description:

Seven (7) rooftops serving the Kitchen, Library and D Wing are 21 to 23 years old and are not high efficiency. The other rooftop units on the building units are typically 3 to 15 years old.

The seven (7) older units can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New rooftop units provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and higher efficiency refrigerants such as R410A which would be used in place of R22 that is currently used in the unit. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of five (5) 4-ton units for the D Wing, one (1) 3-ton rooftop unit for the Library, and one (1) rooftop of unknown capacity for the Kitchen, with new higher efficiency models. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. Cost savings are based on the existing units to be replaced with high efficiency models. It could also be assumed that rooftop equipment will not be replaced until the time that equipment replacement becomes necessary owing to age, condition and increasing maintenance costs. Replacing the rooftop equipment with high efficiency models is a marginally better option than standard efficiency units, yielding an incremental payback of approximately 8.3 to 14.4 years. A summary of the unit replacement for this ECM can be found in the table below:

The manufacturer used as the basis for the calculation is Carrier or equal. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on existing to be replaced with high efficiency units and current equipment costs, quotes and labor rates. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

RTU-1 D WING 5 48,000 20.0 Carrier - 50HCQ - 4 Tons

RTU-2 LIBRARY 1 36,000 3.0 Carrier - 50HCQ - 3 Tons

RTU-3 KITCHEN 1 18,000 1.5 Carrier - SEER 16 - 1-1/2 Tons

Total 7 204,000 24.5

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

Page 30: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 29 of 51

EnergySavings, kWh CoolingCapacity,BTUHr

1SEER

1SEER

OperationHours

1000 WkWh

DemandSavings, kWEnergySavings kWhHoursofCooling

CoolingCostSavings EnergySavings, kWh CostofElectricity$

kWh

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings Project costs are estimated based on RS Means Unit Cost Data, vendor quotes and local mechanical contractor cost estimates. From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the rebate is $92 per ton. The maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM can be significant but could not be estimated at this time.

Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

ECM INPUTSCOOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

STD EFF UNITS SEER

REPLACEMENT SEER

# OF UNITS

ANNUAL HEATING

HOURS

STD EFF UNITS HSPF

REPLACEMENT HSPF

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kW

RTU-1 48,000 800 10.2 SEER 15.8 SEER 5 900 5.5 HSPF 8.1 HSPF 19,278 24.1

RTU-2 36,000 800 10 SEER 15.6 SEER 1 900 5.5 HSPF 8.0 HSPF 2,875 3.6

RTU-3 18,000 800 10 SEER 16 SEER 1 0 N/A N/A 540 0.7

Total 800 7 22,692 28.4

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

ECM INPUTSEQUIPMENT

COST# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST REBATES NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK YEARS

RTU-1 $9,900 5 $49,500 $1,840 $47,660 $2,005 23.8

RTU-2 $8,325 1 $8,325 $276 $8,049 $299 26.9

RTU-3 $6,975 1 $6,975 $138 $6,837 $56 121.7

Total 7 $64,800 $2,254 $62,546 $2,360 26.5

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 31: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 30 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $64,800

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $2,254

Net Installation Cost ($): $62,546

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,360

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,360

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 26.5

Simple Lifetime ROI -43.4%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0

Simple Lifetime Savings $35,400

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -6%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($34,372.47)

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 32: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 31 of 51

ECM #7: High-Efficiency Ductless Split System Heat Pump Description: General heating and cooling for the older wings of the Maud Abrams School is provided by older Fujitsu ductless mini-split air conditioners and unit ventilator hot water heating. The mini-split units serving this space are beginning to fail and replacement parts are not available. It is estimated that the existing air-cooled condensing unit is operating at an efficiency of 9.3 to 10.5 EER (10.1 to 12.0 SEER) and a natural gas heating efficiency seventy percent (70%). Currently the classrooms are equipped with two 2-ton units, double the necessary capacity, and alternate from year to year from one unit to the other.

New higher efficiency ductless mini-split heat pumps are available which will save cooling and even heating energy. The new units will provide heating and cooling capacities typical to that of the existing equipment. The recommended new ductless mini-split heat pumps shall be Mitsubishi MSZ-HE. The units are capable of operation down to 5 degrees F and below and the existing hot water unit ventilators can be used during times of low ambient temperature.

Note: Sizing indicated within the calculation of this ECM is based largely on a one for two replacement of the existing mini-split system units. Owner should retain a Professional Engineer verify heating and cooling loads prior to moving forward with this ECM.

The manufacturers used as the basis for the calculation is Mitsubishi. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on installed costs for high efficiency units and current rates quotes and labor rates. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

DMSS-1 1-1/2 Ton 1 18,000 1.5 Mitsubishi MSZ-HE18NA

DMSS-2 2 Ton 48 24,000 2.0 Mitsubishi MSZ-HE24NA

DMSS-3 3 Ton 1 36,000 3.0 Mitsubishi MSZ-D36NA

Total 50

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

Page 33: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 32 of 51

CoolingEnergySavings, kWh

CoolingCapacity,BTUHr

1SEER

1SEER

OperationHours

1000 WkWh

DemandSavings, kWEnergySavings kWhHoursofCooling

CoolingCostSavings EnergySavings, kWh CostofElectricity$

kWh

HeatingEnergySavings, therms

HeatingCapacity,BTUHr

1BoilerSysEff

OperationHours

100,000 Btuhtherm

HeatingEnergyCosts, kWh HeatingCapacity,BTUHr

1HSPF

OperationHours

3,412 BtuhkWh

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the rebate is $92 per ton. Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

The maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM can be significant but could not be estimated at this time.

ECM INPUTS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

STD EFF UNITS SEER

REPLACEMENT SEER

# OF UNITS

ANNUAL HEATING

HOURS

STD EFF UNITS HSPF

REPLACEMENT HSPF

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

ENERGY SAVINGS

Therms

DEMAND SAVINGS

kW

DMSS-1 18,000 800 15.8 SEER 18 SEER 1 900 N/A 8.5 HSPF -1,794 231 0.1

DMSS-2 24,000 800 11.7 SEER 18 SEER 48 900 N/A 8.5 HSPF -94,407 14,811 34.5

DMSS-3 36,000 800 10.2 SEER 14.5 SEER 1 900 N/A 8.2 HSPF -3,114 463 1.0

Total 50 -99,316 15,506 35.6

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

ECM INPUTS EQUIPMENT

COST# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST REBATES NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK YEARS

DMSS-1 $5,800 1 $5,800 $138 $5,662 $80 71.2

DMSS-2 $6,200 48 $297,600 $8,832 $288,768 $7,215 40.0

DMSS-3 $8,325 1 $8,325 $276 $8,049 $208 38.6

Total 50 $311,725 $9,246 $302,479 $7,503 40.3

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 34: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 33 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $311,725

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $9,246

Net Installation Cost ($): $302,479

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $7,503

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $7,503

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 40.3

Simple Lifetime ROI -62.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $112,545

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -10%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($212,908.67)

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 35: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 34 of 51

ECM #8: Install VFD on Hot Water Pumps Description: The hot water system at the Maud Abrams School utilizes two (2) duty/stand-by constant speed pumps to circulate condenser water from the boiler plant throughout the building. Based on the survey of the existing equipment it appears that the hot water unit ventilators only have manual shut-off valves for flow control and do not allow the system to reduce flow when it is not needed. This ECM includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on the two (2) 5 horsepower existing hot water pumps. The VFD control is based on a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water. This ECM also includes replacement of the existing pump motors with inverter duty motors that meet NEMA Premium Efficiency Standard, which also helps to reduce energy consumption. Energy Savings Calculations:

PumpPowerHPFlow Head .

3650 η η

EnergyConsumption kWh MotorHP 0.746kWHP

Hoursofoperation Hr1

η

TotalEnergyConsumption kWh EnergyConsumptionofEachMotor

EnergyCost $ TotalComsumption kWh AverageCostofElectric$

kWh

Affinity Laws are used in order to calculate energy savings by calculating the reduced power consumption requirement based a reduction in flow. Affinity laws, are as following: Q = Flow, n = RPM, p = total pressure QQ

nn

pp

nn

HPHP

nn

Page 36: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 35 of 51

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control Throttle VFD -

Motor Nameplate HP 5.0 5.0

Flow* (GPM) 235 235 -

Head* (Ft) 85 85 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 80.0% 80.0% -

Motor Efficiency (%) 87.5% 89.5% 2.0%

Operating Hrs 5096 5096 -

Estimated Power (HP) 7.2 7.0 0.16

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.104 0.104 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 31,308 9,311 21,996

Electric Energy Cost ($) $3,256 $968 $2,288

HOT WATER SET #1 PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS:

Page 37: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 36 of 51

Estimated Operating Profile with VFD

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $16,622

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $16,622

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,288

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,288

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 7.3

Simple Lifetime ROI 106.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $34,320

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 11%

Net Present Value (NPV) $10,692.00

ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 38: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 37 of 51

ECM #9: Boiler Controls – Hot Water Reset Description: The space heating for the Maud Abrams School is provided from a central boiler plant. The boiler plant houses two (2) modular gas-fired boilers comprised of three (3) modular sections each. The boilers are not controlled by any building automation system. Currently the boiler hot water temperature is set at 180 degrees F year round. Heating energy consumption at the facility can be reduced by approximately 10 percent by automatically resetting the heating hot water temperature. We are estimating that controlling the heating hot water temperature automatically between a hot water supply set point of 160 degrees (manufacturer’s recommended minimum setting) and 180 degrees based on outside air temperature will save 10 percent of heating hot water energy, which is currently lost and not being realized. This is because the hot water temperature is not being adjusted on a momentary basis at night or on weekends, or even during the day, to account for routine variations in the outdoor air temperature, i.e. the heating needs of the building. This energy conservation measure will require the installation of hot water reset controls on the boilers including an outdoor air sensor Energy Savings Calculations: The energy savings are being estimated to reduce hot water heating fuel consumption by 10%. HVAC Heating Energy HeatingSavings HeatingFuel Units 90% Est. HVACShare SavingsFactor HVAC Electric Energy ElectricSavings BldgElectricUsage kWh 40% Est. HVACShare SavingsFactor

Page 39: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 38 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Existing ControlsAutomatic Hot Water Reset

Annual Heating Boiler Natural Gas Usage (Therms)

37,829 - -

Savings Factor (%) - 10%

Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.150 $1.150 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Natural Gas Usage (therm) 37,829 34,046 3,783

Total Energy Cost ($) $43,503 $39,153 $4,350

BOILER CONTROLS UPGRADE - AUTOMATIC HOT WATER RESET

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS:

Installation Cost ($): $3,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $3,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,350

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,350

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 0.7

Simple Lifetime ROI 2075.0%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $65,250

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 145%

Net Present Value (NPV) $48,930.02

ECM #9 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 40: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 39 of 51

ECM #10: Install Window Film Description: The majority of the facility envelope consists of older, single pane windows with metal frames and single pane translucent plastic to limit light transmission and solar heat into the classrooms. The translucent plastic of the window panel is approximately 60 percent of the entire window area, with the single pane glass making up the remaining 40 percent. There are also a smaller number of windows found on the D and E Wings with high efficiency double pane glass. The windows account for significant energy use through leakage heat loss, conductive heat loss and solar heat gain in the cooling months. The age and condition of the windows contribute to the leakage rate of the building. The single pane construction allows higher thermal (conductive) energy loss and solar heat gains. These factors lead to increased energy use in the heating and cooling seasons. This ECM includes the installation of Llumar EnerLogic Window Film (or equal) on all of the older single pane glass and opaque plastic panels windows in A, B and C Wings of the school facility. The proposed specialty window film has a single pane SHCG of 0.24 and U-values of 0.59 (winter) / 0.42 (summer), which not only reduces heat gain the summer but also reduces heat losses in the winter. Where windows are found to be leaky they should also be properly weather sealed, however this is not included as part of the ECM cost or savings calculations. The basis for this ECM is Llumar Enerlogic 35 Series window film at $6 per SF of window film installed. Below is a list of areas with older and inefficient windows:

WINDOW REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

ECM INPUTS NUMBER OF WINDOWS

SIZE AREA

A, B and C Wings 108 6' x 4' 2,592

TOTAL 108 - 2,592

Energy Savings Calculations: The energy savings calculations are based on a model of the schools windows using RETScreen, which calculates conductive heat gains and losses, solar heat gains and infiltration losses. For the purpose of this ECM, energy savings credit was not taken for any infiltration improvements which would not be realized by window film installation, but only by a window weather sealing program. A copy of the RETScreen calculation inputs and outputs is included in the Appendices of this report.

Page 41: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 40 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $15,552

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $15,552

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,843

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,843

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 8.4

Simple Lifetime ROI 77.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $27,645

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 8%

Net Present Value (NPV) $6,449.61

ECM #10 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 42: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 41 of 51

ECM #11: Remove Kitchen Electric Domestic Booster Heater

Description: The existing commercial dishwasher at Maud Abrams utilizes a 15 kW electric booster heater to provide approximately 180 degrees F hot water for sterilization. A natural gas hot water heater is currently in use immediately nearby in the boiler room which is a less expensive source of fuel. However the boiler room domestic water heater is not used to make 180 degree water at the present even though it is capable. The domestic hot water heater could be reset to 180 degrees and piped to the nearby kitchen dishwasher and hot water to the rest of the building could be controlled with a fail-safe mixing valve tied to an unheated water line to produce lower temperature hot water for the rest of the building. This option is much less expensive than installing a gas tankless water heater to replace the electric dishwasher booster heater, as the energy savings are not significant enough to justify a new water heater. This ECM includes piping of the existing boiler room domestic hot water heater to the commercial kitchen dishwasher and the installation of a mixing valve and safety controls at the hot water heater to provide lower temperature hot water to the rest of the building. Energy Savings Calculations: BoosterHWHeat BTU

WasherGalMin

8.33LbsGal

UseMinWk

WkYr

TempRise °F

1.0BTU

Lb °F

ElecBoosterEnergyBoosterHWHeat BTU

ElecHeatValue BTUkWh

GasWaterHeaterEnergyDHWHeat BTU

HWHEff. % GasHeatValue BTUTherm

DemandSavings kWInputRating, Btuh Efficiency

3412 CoincidenceFactor 30%

ElecEnergyCost EnergyUse, kWh CostofElec$

kWh

Page 43: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 42 of 51

NatGasEnergyCost EnergyUse, Therms CostofNatGas$

Therm

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS Elec Booster Heater Nat Gas HWHEstimated Dish Washer Use (GPM)

4.4 4.4

Dish Washer Use (Min/Week) *1 Hr Per Day

300 300

Dish Washer Use (Week/Yr) 42 42

Booster Temp Rise (°F) 60 60

Dom. HWH Efficiency (%) 100% 80% -20%

Electric Demand (kW) 15 0 5

Booster HW Heat Required (kBTUs)

27,457 27,457

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.079 0.079

Electric Demand Costs ($/kW) 2.90 2.90

Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.15 1.15

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSProposed Booster Dom. HW Natural Gas Usage (Therms)

0 343 -343

Elec Booster Energy (kWh) 8,045 0 8,045

Elec Energy Cost ($) $766 $0 $766

Gas Energy Cost ($) $0 $395 -$395

Total Energy Cost ($) $766 $395 $371

COMMENTS:

INSTANT DOM. HWH BOOSTER CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

This ECM is based on savings due to the fuel switching from electric to natural gas and includes affects from efficiency change.

Page 44: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 43 of 51

There is no maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $5,500

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $5,500

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $371

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $371

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 14.8

Simple Lifetime ROI 1.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $5,565

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 0%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($1,071.03)

ECM #11 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 45: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 44 of 51

ECM #12: Water Conservation Description: The facility utilizes standard plumbing fixtures. The typical water closet and urinal water consumption meet the minimum federally required standard for water efficiency. New fixtures are available that use less water than today’s requirements and can add up to significant water reduction over a long period. However new fixtures are relatively expensive compared to the amount of savings that will be realized at a school, except that lavatory low flow aerators and a kitchen low flow spray washer can be installed at minimal costs. This ECM includes the replacement of the existing sink faucet aerators within the bathrooms and a new kitchen spray washer in the kitchen of the facility. The estimated usage of the plumbing fixtures is based on the total population of the facility. The number of plumbing fixtures to be replaced is based on observation of the facility in combination with federal minimum standards per occupancy load. For the basis of this calculation the LEED rating system was used to estimate the occupancy usage for students within the school. When water consumption information was not available, the GPF values were estimated for the existing fixtures. Energy Savings Calculations: Faucets: WaterConsumption

OccupiedDaysYear

FixtureQuantity UseTimeminDay

FixtureGalMin

WaterCost WaterConsumption GallonskGal

1,000Gal WaterRate

$kGal

HeatingUse FuelUnits

FaucetWaterConsumption Gallons 8.34BtuGal

FuelUnitsBtu

65 ∆T

1Efficiency

Spray Washer: WaterConsumption

OccupiedDaysYear

FixtureQuantity UseTimeminDay

FixtureGalMin

Page 46: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 45 of 51

WaterCost WaterConsumption GallonskGal

1,000Gal WaterRate

$kGal

HeatingUse FuelUnits

SprayWasherWaterConsumption Gallons 8.34BtuGal

FuelUnitsBtu

65 ∆T1

Efficiency

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Quantity of Sinks 64 64

Flow Rate (GPM) 2.00 0.5 1.5

Device Usage (min per day) 6 6

Facility Operation (days / year) 200 200

Heat Content of Water (Btu/gal/°F 8.34 8.34

Temperature Rise (°F) 65.0 65.0

Efficiency of Heating System (%) 100% 100%

Conversion Factor for Electric 3413 3413

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.104 $0.104

Water Rate ($/1000gal) $8.070 $8.070

Electric Usage (kWh) 12,198 3,050 9,149

Water Usage (gallons) 153,600 38,400 115,200

Energy Cost ($) $2,508 $627 $1,881COMMENTS:

LOW FLOW AERATORS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Heating Savings based on 50% Hot Cold Mix

Page 47: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 46 of 51

There are no Smart Start rebates for installation of low flow plumbing fixtures.

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Quantity of Spray Washer 1 1

Flow Rate (GPM) 2.5 1.15 1.35

Device Usage (min per day) 10 10

Facility Operation (days / year) 200 200

Heat Content of Water (Btu/gal/°F) 8.34 8.34

Temperature Rise (°F) 65.0 65.0

Efficiency of Heating System (%) 80% 80%

Conversion Factor for Electric 100,000 100,000

Natural Gas Rate ($/thrm) $1.150 $1.150

Water Rate ($/1000gal) $8.070 $8.070

Natural Gas Usage (therms) 25 12 14

Water Usage (gallons) 5,000 2,300 2,700

Energy Cost ($) $70 $32 $38COMMENTS:

LOW FLOW SPRAY WASHER

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Heating Savings based on 75% Hot Cold Mix

Page 48: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 47 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $1,689

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $1,689

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $951

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $968

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,919

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 10

Simple Payback 0.9

Simple Lifetime ROI 1036.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $9,510

Simple Lifetime Savings $19,190

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 114%

Net Present Value (NPV) $14,680.46

ECM #12 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 49: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 48 of 51

ECM #13: Energy Management System with DDC and Wireless Controls Description: The facility is controlled by programmable thermostats and unitary electronic controls for the rooftop units. The programmable thermostats are set according to School District guidelines for occupied and unoccupied settings, however these settings were found to be revised or field adjusted in some instances. The thermostat night setback settings could be expanded for greater energy savings, especially in the winter, and even in the summer with the use of an outdoor humidity sensor. However expanding the night setback would require that the HVAC units be started earlier in the morning to guarantee occupied temperature settings when students and teachers arrive, which results in some reduction of those savings. An energy management system (EMS) could eliminate these problems, expanding the night setback range while employing Optimal Start/Stop to turn on every HVAC unit individually at the precise time necessary to achieve occupied temperature settings. The EMS looks at the outdoor the indoor temperatures for each HVAC zone and starts the units at the latest time possible to reach set point. This would maximize night setback savings without affecting occupant comfort. The EMS can also control the boiler room equipment including VFD and hot water temperatures, exhaust fans, and can be programmed for holiday schedules so that all equipment is either off or in setback during holiday periods. A central energy management system can utilize hard wired DDC or less expensive wireless thermostats and technology to tie all of the selected HVAC equipment into the central computer station where all buildings can be monitor and controlled at a single site. Building automation controls will not only save energy it will ensure that the building operates effectively, it will improve building comfort, it will reduce maintenance operating hours and costs and allow for centralized control of the school building(s). Without getting a detailed quote from a controls vendor it is difficult to estimate the overall project costs, but for a limited wireless and DDC system project costs will be evaluated at $3 per building square foot. Energy savings will be estimated at 6 percent of the HVAC energy costs. Conservatively HVAC energy costs will be evaluated at 90 percent of natural gas costs and 40 percent of building electrical use. Although the project cannot be justified on energy savings alone, a review of maintenance costs and the benefits of improved building comfort should be evaluated by the School District. Energy Savings Calculations: HVAC Heating Energy HeatingSavings HeatingFuel Units 90% Est. HVACShare SavingsFactor HVAC Electric Energy ElectricSavings BldgElectricUsage kWh 40% Est. HVACShare SavingsFactor

Page 50: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 49 of 51

Maintenance savings could not be estimated at this time.

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSBuilding Electric Consumption (kWh) 796,036 796,036Builing Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 37,829 37,829

HVAC Electric Use (%) 40% 40%

HVAC Fuel Use (%) 90% 90%Estimated HVAC Energy Savings (%) 0% 6%

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.104 $0.104

Natural Gas Rate ($/therm) $1.150 $1.150

Electric Usage (kWh) 318,414 299,310 19,105

Natural Gas Usage (therms) 34,046 32,003 2,043

Energy Cost ($) $72,268 $67,932 $4,336COMMENTS:

ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project Costs are 58,639 sf x $3/sf = $175,917

Page 51: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 50 of 51

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $175,917

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $175,917

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,336

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,336

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 40.6

Simple Lifetime ROI -63.0%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $65,040

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -10%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($124,154.11)

ECM #13 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 52: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Lower Township B.O.E – Maud Abrams School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 51 of 51

VI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Adjust the building occupied settings to 70 degrees heating and 75 cooling. Allow for a maximum 2 degree reset by the building occupants for individual comfort control.

B. It was noticed that Township thermostat scheduling was not consistent throughout the

facilities. Winter setbacks ranged from 65 to 69 degrees while summer setbacks ranged from 76 to 80 degrees. Change the night setback temperatures to 60 degrees in the winter and 78 to 80 degrees in the summer, depending on seasonal humidity conditions. Plan for an earlier Monday morning start-up to meet the occupied set points as teachers and students arrive.

C. Maximize summer savings by setting summer vacation daytime cooling set points at 76

to 78 degrees, depending on humidity conditions. The buildings do not have to be operated at 70 to 72 degrees during summer vacation. When classrooms or offices are occupied or need to be cleaned, return to the normal occupied cooling set points for that time period, If the building is positively pressurized (instead of negatively pressurized) there will be no infiltration and the building humidity levels will be kept much lower.

D. Test and air balance the building supply and exhaust air systems so as to always maintain a positive pressure in the building, day and night. If the building is not positively pressurized infiltration into the building will occur. Infiltration is the source of cold drafts in the winter and high building humidity in the summer. Cold drafts and high humidity cause building occupants to feel uncomfortable and adjust the thermostats to compensate for the uncontrolled conditions. This wastes heating and cooling energies.

E. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency.

Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

F. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

G. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.

H. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

I. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode. Unplug unused appliances during summer vacation.

J. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

Page 53: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX A

Page 54: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR)

NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)

MATERIAL LABORREBATES,

INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost)

(Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Indoor Lighting $64,005 $30,816 $10,995 $83,826 $8,063 $1,899 $9,962 15 $149,430 $28,485 78.3% 8.4 8.28% $35,099.71

ECM #2 LED Exterior Lighting $6,453 $2,610 $2,760 $6,303 $953 $578 $1,531 15 $22,965 $8,670 264.4% 4.1 23.23% $11,973.98

ECM #3 Lighting Controls $4,100 $1,550 $90 $5,560 $487 $0 $487 18 $8,766 $0 57.7% 11.4 5.30% $1,137.96

ECM #4 Bi-Level Lighting in Hallways $3,000 $750 $0 $3,750 $290 $0 $290 18 $5,220 $0 39.2% 12.9 3.74% $238.52

ECM #5 Vending Miser $358 $70 $0 $428 $416 $0 $416 18 $7,488 $0 1649.5% 1.0 97.20% $5,293.46

ECM #6 High Efficiency Rooftop Units $43,200 $21,600 $2,254 $62,546 $2,360 $0 $2,360 15 $35,400 $0 -43.4% 26.5 -6.40% ($34,372.47)

ECM #7 High Efficient Ductless Mini-Splits $156,200 $155,525 $9,246 $302,479 $7,503 $0 $7,503 15 $112,545 $0 -62.8% 40.3 -10.40% ($212,908.67)

ECM #8VFD on Hot Water Pumps with 2-Way

Valves$10,762 $5,860 $0 $16,622 $2,288 $0 $2,288 15 $34,320 $0 106.5% 7.3 10.82% $10,692.00

ECM #9 Hot Water Reset $1,250 $1,750 $0 $3,000 $4,350 $0 $4,350 15 $65,250 $0 2075.0% 0.7 145.00% $48,930.02

ECM #10 Window Film $7,776 $7,776 $0 $15,552 $1,843 $0 $1,843 15 $27,645 $0 77.8% 8.4 8.23% $6,449.61

ECM #11 Gas Kitchen Dishwasher Heater $2,000 $3,500 $0 $5,500 $371 $0 $371 15 $5,565 $0 1.2% 14.8 0.15% ($1,071.03)

ECM #12 Water Conservation $1,035 $654 $0 $1,689 $968 $951 $1,919 10 $19,190 $9,510 1036.2% 0.9 113.56% $14,680.46

ECM #13 Energy Management System $58,639 $117,278 $0 $175,917 $4,336 $0 $4,336 15 $65,040 $0 -63.0% 40.6 -10% ($124,154.11)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN

CONCORD ENGINEERING

Lower Township Board of Education - Maud Abrams School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGS

ECM LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 55: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX B

Page 56: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix B Page 1 of 6

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, further details including how to apply, forms, and calculated incentive values can be found the Clean Energy Website. (www.njcleanenergy.com)

Electric Chillers

Water-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $8 - $30 per ton

Performance Add: $2 - $2.25 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $12 - $44 per ton Performance Add: $2 - $4.00 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $20 per ton

Performance Add: $3.50 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $90 - $92 per ton Performance Add: $4.00 per ton

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers (Indirect & Direct-Fired)

$185 - $450 per ton

Desiccant Systems

$1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC

Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton

Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton

Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

A/C Economizing Controls < 5 tons $85/unit; >5 tons $170/unit Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Page 57: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix B Page 2 of 6

Gas Heating

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH

Non-Condensing: $0.95 per MBH,

Minimum $400 per unit Condensing:

$2.00 per MBH, Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

Non-Condensing: $1.75 per MBH

Condensing: $2.20 per MBH

Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH

Non-Condensing: $1.50 per MBH

Condensing: $2.20 per MBH

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

Non-Condensing: $1.30 per MBH

Condensing: $2.00 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers < 300 MBH

$1.40 per MBH, Minimum $400 per unit

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers ≥ 300 – 1500 MBH

$1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 1500 – 2500 MBH

$1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 2500 – 4000 MBH

$1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft < 300 MBH

$1.40 per MBH, Minimum $300 per unit

Steam, Natural Draft ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

$1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH

$0.90 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

$0.70 per MBH

All Types Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH

(Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 95%

Boiler Economizing Controls $1,200 - $2,700

Low Intensity Infrared Heating $300 - $500 per unit

Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67

energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH

Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH

Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Page 58: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix B Page 3 of 6

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp

Chilled-Water Pumps ≥ 20 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Rotary Screw Air Compressors ≥ 25 hp $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Centrifugal Fan Applications on

Constant Volume HVAC Systems $80 per VFD rated hp, maximum

$6,000 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Boiler Fans > 5 HP $65 to $155 per hp

Boiler Feed Water Pumps > 5 HP $60 to $155 per hp

Commercial Kitchen Hood up to 50 HP Retrofit $55 – $300 per hp

New Hood $55 - $250 per hp

Prescriptive Lighting

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

For retrofit of T-8 fixtures by permanent de-lamping & new reflectors

(Electronic ballast replacement required)

$5 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $25 - $150 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replace with new induction fixture.

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$70 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

Page 59: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix B Page 4 of 6

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED Architectural Floor and Spot Luminaires

$50 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs.

$150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Linear Ambient Luminaires (Indirect, Indirect/Direct, Direct/Indirect, Direct)

2’ Fixtures - $20/fixture 3’ Fixtures - $30/fixture 4’ Fixtures - $45/fixture 6’ Fixtures - $60/fixture 8’ Fixtures - $75/fixture

LED Linear Replacement Lamps (2’ & 4’ only)

$5 per lamp

Luminaires for Ambient Lighting of Interior Commercial Spaces

(1x4, 2x2, 2x4 New Fixtures and Retrofit Kits)

1x4 LED - $15 per fixture 2x2 LED - $15 per fixture 2x4 LED - $25 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area and Roadway Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries

$50 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Retrofit Kits for Large Outdoor Pole / Arm-Mounted Area and

Roadway Luminaires $150 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$30 per 4 foot $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

Page 60: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix B Page 5 of 6

LED Stairwell and Passageway Luminaires

$40 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures

$30 per fixture

LED Wall-Wash Lights $30 per fixture

EnergyStar Commercial Lighting Fixtures

$5 to $10 per fixture

EnergyStar Screw and Pine-Based Bulbs

$5 to $10 per lamp

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$20 per control

Remote Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Daylight Dimming Controls $45 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Based hi-low Dimming Control

$35 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted High-Bay (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Refrigeration Doors/Covers

Energy-Efficient Doors/Covers for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$100 per door

Aluminum Night Curtains for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$3.50 per linear foot

Refrigeration Controls

Door Heater Controls $50 per control Electric Defrost Controls $50 per control Evaporator Fan Controls $75 per control Novelty Cooler Shutoff $50 per control

Refrigerator / Freezer Case Premium Efficiency Motors

Fraction ECM Motor < 1 HP $40 per ECM for replacement of

existing shaded-pole motor

Page 61: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix B Page 6 of 6

Food Service Equipment

Combination Oven/Steamer (Electric) $1,000/oven

Combination Oven/Steamer (Natural Gas)

$750/oven

Convection Oven (Electric) $350/oven

Convection Oven (Natural Gas) $500/oven

Rack Oven (Natural Gas) $1,000/single oven, $2,000/double oven

Conveyor Oven (Natural Gas) $500/small deck $750/large deck

Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Fryer (Natural Gas) $749/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Natural Gas) $500/vat

Griddle (Electric) $300/griddle

Griddle (Natural Gas) $125/griddle

Steam Cooker (Electric) $1,250/steamer

Steam Cooker (Natural Gas) $2,000/steamer

Insulated Holding Cabinets $200 to $300/unit

Glass Door Refrigerators $75 to $150/unit

Solid Door Refrigerators $50 to $200/unit

Glass Door Freezers $200 to $1,000/unit

Solid Door Freezers $100 to $600/unit

Ice Machines $50 to $500/unit

Dishwashers $400 to $1,500/unit

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives

not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000

KWh or 1,500 Therms and an IRR of at least 10%.

Page 62: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX C

Page 63: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

ENERGY STAR® Statement of EnergyPerformance

75ENERGY STAR®

Score1

Maud Abrams Elementary School

Primary Property Function: K-12 SchoolGross Floor Area (ft²): 58,639Built: 1966

For Year Ending: May 31, 2015Date Generated: October 06, 2015

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar buildings nationwide, adjusting forclimate and business activity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressMaud Abrams Elementary School714 Town Bank RoadCape May, New Jersey 08204

Property OwnerLower Township Elementary SchoolDstrict905 Seashore RoadCape May, NJ 08204(____)____-______

Primary ContactFrank Onorato905 Seashore RoadCape May, NJ [email protected]

Property ID: 4559684

Energy Consumption and Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Site EUI99.9 kBtu/ft²

Annual Energy by FuelNatural Gas (kBtu) 3,162,009 (54%)Electric - Grid (kBtu) 861,035 (15%)Electric - Solar (kBtu) 1,835,127 (31%)

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 128.2National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 171.9% Diff from National Median Source EUI -22%

Source EUI134 kBtu/ft²

Annual EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric TonsCO2e/year)

529

Signature & Stamp of Verifying Professional

I ___________________ (Name) verify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature: _______________________Date: ___________

Licensed Professional

____ ________,(____)____-________________________

Professional Engineer Stamp(if applicable)

Page 64: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 1 of 8

ENERGY STAR® Data Verification Checklist

75ENERGY STAR ®

Score1

Maud Abrams Elementary School

Registry Name: Maud Abrams Elementary SchoolPrimary Function: K-12 SchoolGross Floor Area (ft²): 58,639Built: 1966

For Year Ending: 05/31/2015Date Generated: 10/06/2015

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-to-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar building nationwide, adjusting for climate and businessactivity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressMaud Abrams Elementary School714 Town Bank RoadCape May, New Jersey 08204

Property ID: 4559684

Property OwnerLower Township Elementary SchoolDstrict905 Seashore RoadCape May, NJ 08204(____)____-______

Primary ContactFrank Onorato905 Seashore RoadCape May, NJ [email protected]

1. Review of Whole Property Characteristics

Basic Property Information

1) Property Name: Maud Abrams Elementary School

Is this the official name of the property?

If “No”, please specify: _____________________________________

Yes No

2) Primary Function: K-12 School

Is this an accurate description of the primary use of this property? Yes No

3) Location:

714 Town Bank RoadCape May, New Jersey 08204

Is this correct and complete?

Yes No

4) Gross Floor Area: 58,639 ft² Yes No

Page 65: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 2 of 8

Does this represent the entire property? (i.e., no part of the building/property wasexcluded/subtracted from the total) If “no” please specify what space has been excluded.

5) Average Occupancy: 100

Is this occupancy accurate for the entire 12 month period being assessed? Yes No

6) Number of Buildings: 1

Does this number accurately represent all structures? Yes No

Notes:

Indoor Environmental Standards

1) Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality

Does this property meet the ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoorair quality?

Yes No

2) Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions

Does this property meet the ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort? Yes No

3) Adequate Illumination

Does this property adhere to the IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality? Yes No

Notes:

2. Review of Property Use Details

K-12 School: Building Use

This Use Detail is used to calculate the 1-100 ENERGY STAR Score.

1) Gross Floor Area: 58,639 ft²

Is this the total size, as measured between the principal exterior surfaces of theenclosing fixed walls of the building(s)? This includes all areas inside the building(s)such as: occupied tenant areas, common areas, meeting areas, break rooms,

Yes No

Page 66: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 3 of 8

restrooms, elevator shafts, mechanical equipment areas, and storage rooms. GrossFloor Area should not include interstitial plenum space between floors, which may housepipes and ventilation. Gross Floor Area is not the same as rentable, but rather includesall area inside the building(s). Leasable space would be a sub-set of Gross Floor Area.In the case where there is an atrium, you should count the Gross Floor Area at thebase level only. Do not increase the size to accommodate open atrium space at higherlevels. The Gross Floor Area should not include any exterior spaces such as balconiesor exterior loading docks and driveways.

2) Gymnasium Floor Area: 5,980 ft²

Does the gymnasium floor area include all areas devoted to a gymnasium, includinggymnasium/athletic areas, spectator areas, locker rooms, and other associated spaces?

Yes No

3) High School: No

Is the property a high school (teaching grades 10, 11, and/or 12)? If the propertyteaches to high school students at all, the user should check ‘yes’ to ‘high school’. Forexample, if the school teaches to grades K-12 (elementary/middle and high school), theuser should check ‘yes’ to ‘high school’.

Yes No

4) Number of Workers on Main Shift: 41

Is this the number of workers present during the main shift? Note that this is not a totalcount of workers, but rather a count of workers who are present at the same time. Forexample, if there are two daily eight hour shifts of 100 workers each, the Number ofWorkers on Main Shift value is 100. Number of Workers on Main Shift may includeemployees of the property, sub-contractors who are onsite regularly, and volunteerswho perform regular onsite tasks. Number of Workers should not include visitors to thebuildings such as clients, customers, or patients.

Yes No

5) Student Seating Capacity: 474

Is this the maximum number of students for which the school was designed? Thisshould include the seating capacity of the entire school. If portable classrooms havebeen added to the school, include the capacity of these classrooms, as they expand theoverall capacity of the school.

Yes No

6) Months in Use: 10

Is this the total number of months that the property is open for standard activities? Yes No

7) Weekend Operation: No

Does the property include regular activities on the weekend beyond the scope ofmaintenance, cleaning, and security personnel? Weekend activity could include anytime when the property is used for classes, performances, or other school or communityactivities. The Yes selection is appropriate for any property that is open on one or bothdays of the weekend during one or more seasons of the year.

Yes No

8) Number of Computers: 190

Is this the total number of desktop computers, laptops, and data servers at the property?This number should not include tablet computers, such as iPads, or any other types ofoffice equipment. The count should only reflect computers that are owned by the school.It should not include any computers that are brought onsite by students or staff.

Yes No

9) Cooking Facilities: 100% Yes

Does the property have a commercial cooking area designed to provide and serve foodto occupants and/or visitors? This may include restaurants and cafeterias. If the propertycontains only employee break room kitchens, this field should be marked No.

Yes No

Page 67: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 4 of 8

10) Number of Walk-in Refrigeration/Freezer Units: 2

Is this the total count of walk-in units at the property? Walk-in Refrigeration/Freezersare typically very large units located in storage areas or commercial kitchens that wouldnot be accessible to all building occupants. This count should only include large storageunits that a person actually walks into in order to store or retrieve perishable goods.

Yes No

11) Percent That Can Be Heated: 100

Is this the total percentage of the property that can be heated by mechanical equipment? Yes No

12) Percent That Can Be Cooled: 100

Is this the total percentage of the property that can be cooled by mechanical equipment?This includes all types of cooling from central air to individual window units.

Yes No

13) School District: Lower Township

Is this the administrative school district in which the property is located? Yes No

Notes:

3. Review of Energy Consumption

Data Overview

Site Energy Use SummaryNatural Gas (kBtu) 3,162,009.3 (54%)Electric - Grid (kBtu) 861,034.8 (15%)Electric - Solar (kBtu) 1,835,127.2 (31%)Total Energy (kBtu) 5,858,171.2

Energy IntensitySite (kBtu/ft²) 99.9Source (kBtu/ft²) 134

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 128.2National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 171.9% Diff from National Median SourceEUI

-22%

Emissions (based on site energy use)Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MetricTons CO2e)

528.9

Power Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:Atlantic City Electric Co [Pepco Holdings Inc]

Note: All values are annualized to a 12-month period. Source Energy includes energy used in generation and transmission to enable an equitable assessment.

Summary of All Associated Meters

The following meters are associated with the property, meaning that they are added together to get the total energy use for theproperty. Please see additional tables in this checklist for the exact meter consumption values.

Page 68: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 5 of 8

Meter Name Fuel Type Start Date End Date Associated With

Natural Gas Natural Gas 03/19/2014 03/20/2015Maud AbramsElementary School

Electric Solar Meter Electric on Site Solar 06/01/2014 05/31/2015Maud AbramsElementary School

Electric Grid Meter Electric 05/19/2014 05/19/2015Maud AbramsElementary School

Total Energy Use

Do the meters shown above account for the total energy use of this property during thereporting period of this application?

Yes No

Additional Fuels

Do the meters above include all fuel types at the property? That is, no additional fuels such asdistrict steam, generator fuel oil have been excluded.

Yes No

On-Site Solar and Wind Energy

Are all on-site solar and wind installations reported in this list (if present)? All on-site systemsmust be reported.

Yes No

Notes:

Natural Gas Meter: Natural Gas (therms)

Associated With: Maud Abrams Elementary SchoolStart Date End Date Usage

05/15/2014 06/16/2014 205

06/16/2014 07/16/2014 97

07/16/2014 08/14/2014 87

08/14/2014 09/16/2014 131

09/16/2014 10/16/2014 184

10/16/2014 11/13/2014 2,107

11/13/2014 12/13/2014 5,117

12/13/2014 01/20/2015 7,964

Page 69: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 6 of 8

Start Date End Date Usage

01/20/2015 02/19/2015 8,638

02/19/2015 03/20/2015 7,199

Total Consumption (therms): 31,729

Total Consumption (kBtu (thousandBtu)):

3,172,900

Total Energy Consumption for this Meter

Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include consumption of all energy trackedthrough this meter that affect energy calculations for the reporting period of this application(i.e., do the entries match the utility bills received by the property)?

Yes No

Notes:

Electric on Site Solar Meter: Electric Solar Meter (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

Associated With: Maud Abrams Elementary School

Start Date End Date Energy Used OnsiteEnergy

Exported OffsiteREC Ownership

06/01/2014 06/30/2014 61,706 0 Sold

07/01/2014 07/31/2014 60,592 0 Sold

08/01/2014 08/31/2014 58,137 0 Sold

09/01/2014 09/30/2014 45,658 0 Sold

10/01/2014 10/31/2014 45,658 0 Sold

11/01/2014 11/30/2014 28,030 3,453 Sold

12/01/2014 12/31/2014 19,652 0 Sold

01/01/2015 01/31/2015 28,559 0 Sold

02/01/2015 02/28/2015 31,265 0 Sold

03/01/2015 03/31/2015 39,249 0 Sold

04/01/2015 04/30/2015 53,334 0 Sold

05/01/2015 05/31/2015 66,005 0 Sold

Total Consumption (kWh (thousandWatt-hours)):

537,845

Total Consumption (kBtu (thousandBtu)):

1,835,127.1

Total Energy Consumption for this Meter Yes No

Page 70: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 7 of 8

Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include consumption of all energy trackedthrough this meter that affect energy calculations for the reporting period of this application(i.e., do the entries match the utility bills received by the property)?

Notes:

Electric Meter: Electric Grid Meter (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

Associated With: Maud Abrams Elementary SchoolStart Date End Date Usage Green Power?

05/19/2014 06/18/2014 13,468 No

06/18/2014 07/18/2014 16,225 No

07/18/2014 08/18/2014 15,156 No

08/18/2014 09/17/2014 28,704 No

09/17/2014 10/17/2014 22,954 No

10/17/2014 11/14/2014 0 No

11/14/2014 12/15/2014 45,852 No

12/15/2014 01/20/2015 18,945 No

01/21/2015 02/19/2015 21,666 No

02/20/2015 03/20/2015 52,153 No

03/21/2015 04/22/2015 12,294 No

04/23/2015 05/19/2015 10,774 No

Total Consumption (kWh (thousandWatt-hours)):

258,191

Total Consumption (kBtu (thousandBtu)):

880,947.7

Total Energy Consumption for this Meter

Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include consumption of all energy trackedthrough this meter that affect energy calculations for the reporting period of this application(i.e., do the entries match the utility bills received by the property)?

Yes No

Page 71: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Page 8 of 8

Notes:

4. Signature & Stamp of Verifying Licensed Professional

___________________ (Name) visited this site on ___________ (Date). Based on the conditions observed at the timeof the visit to this property, I verify that the information contained within this application is accurate and in accordancewith the Licensed Professional Guide.

Signature: _______________________ Date: _________

Licensed Professional

____ ________,(____)____-________________________

NOTE: When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the signature of theVerifying Professional must match the stamp. Professional Engineer Stamp

(if applicable)

Page 72: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX D

Page 73: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type Rooftop Unit Rooftop Unit Rooftop Unit

Qty 4 1 5

Location Roof Roof Roof

Area Served Multi-Purpose Kitchen Classrooms

Manufacturer ICP - York

Model No. RAS091L0AA0AAAA - B3CH048A258

Serial No. G112130510, -11, -12, -13 5692C04834NGCM064550, NGCM064549,

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 7.5 - 4

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

13 SEER - 10.2 SEER

Heating Type No Heating Gas Furnace Electric Heatpump

Heating Input (MBH) n/a - 48

Efficiency n/a - 3.0/2.0 COP

Supply Fan (HP) 2 0.33 0.75

Supply Fan VFD

Return/Exhaust Fan (HP) n/a n/a n/a

Return/Exhaust Fan VFD

Approx Age 4 23 21

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 0 0

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 1 of 27

Page 74: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type

Cooling Capacity (Tons)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD

Return/Exhaust Fan (HP)

Return/Exhaust Fan VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Rooftop Unit Rooftop Unit Rooftop Unit

2 1 1

Roof Roof Roof

Classrooms Hall Classrooms

York Carrier Lennox

D3NZ030D05606C 48TCEA05A2A5A0A0A0 TGA048B2DH1Y

W1K2180116, W1K2180110

3212C80705 5608B11182

Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

2.5 4 4

13.2 13 SEER 10.0

Gas Furnace Gas Furnace Gas Furnace

70 115 150

- 81 80

0.75 2 0.5

n/a n/a n/a

3 3 7

15 15 15

12 12 8

One Unit w/o gas supply

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 2 of 27

Page 75: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type

Cooling Capacity (Tons)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Efficiency

Supply Fan (HP)

Supply Fan VFD

Return/Exhaust Fan (HP)

Return/Exhaust Fan VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Rooftop Unit Rooftop Unit Rooftop Unit

5 1 1

Roof Roof Rooftop Unit

Classrooms Stage Library

Trane ICP York

YCD048C3L0BF PAF024K0000A B3CH036A258

Z06103278D, Z06100722D,

L004286723 NGCM015341

Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

4 2 3

10.1 10 SEER 10 SEER

Gas Furnace No Heating Electric Heatpump

90 n/a 39

80 n/a 3.0/2.1 COP

0.5 0.25 0.75

n/a n/a n/a

14 15 21

15 15 15

1 0 0

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 3 of 27

Page 76: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Air Handlers

Air Handler UnitsTag

Unit Type Ceiling Hung Ceiling Hung

Qty 1 1

Location Boiler Room Stage

Area Served Kitchen Stage

Manufacturer - -

Model No. - -

Serial No. - -

Cooling Type No Cooling No Cooling

Cooling Capacity (Tons) n/a n/a

Heating Type Hot Water Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) - -

Supply Fan (HP) 1 hp 3/4 hp

Supply Fan VFD

Return Fan (HP) n/a n/a

Return Fan VFD

Approx Age 49 49

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20

Remaining Life 0 0

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 4 of 27

Page 77: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type Fan Coil Window Unit Fan Coil

Qty 13 1 18

Location Hallways Teachers Lounge Classrooms

Area Served Exterior Doorways Teachers Lounge Wings A, B, C

Manufacturer Nesbitt Emerson Nesbitt

Model No. - Queit Kool -

Serial No. - - -

Cooling Type No Cooling Split System DX No Cooling

Cooling Capacity (Tons) n/a - n/a

Cooling Efficiency n/a - n/a

Heating Type Hot Water No Heating Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) - n/a -

Heating Efficiency - n/a -

Approx Age - - -

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20 20

Remaining Life - - -

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 5 of 27

Page 78: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type

Cooling Capacity (Tons)

Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Unit Ventilator

8

Classrooms

Wing D

Nesbitt

-

-

No Cooling

n/a

n/a

Electric

-

-

21

20

0

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 6 of 27

Page 79: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Boilers

BoilersTag

Unit Type Cast-Iron Sectional (Water)

Qty 6

Location Boiler Room

Manufacturer Crown Boiler Co

Model No. 500 Base

Serial No. -

Input Capacity (Btu/h) 500,000

Output Capacity (Btu/h) 400,000

Approx. Efficiency % 80.0%

Fuel Type Natural Gas

Approx Age -

ASHRAE Service Life 35

Remaining Life -

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 7 of 27

Page 80: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag

Unit Type Tank Tankless

Qty 1 4

Location Boiler Room Classrooms

Area Served Kitchen Classrooms

Manufacturer American Ariston

Model # CG32100T004N ProTI

Serial # LR12814905 -

Storage Size (Gal) 100 -

Input Capacity (MBH/KW) 80 MBH -

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 80 n/a

Efficiency % 80% -

Fuel Natural Gas Electric

Approx Age 3 -

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life 12 -

Comments1.5 kW

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 8 of 27

Page 81: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Storage Size (Gal)

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

Recovery (Gal/Hr)

Efficiency %

Fuel

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Tankless Tankless

1 2

Classrooms Classrooms

Classrooms Classrooms

Titan Eemax

- -

- -

- -

- -

n/a n/a

- -

Electric Electric

- -

15 15

- -

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 9 of 27

Page 82: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Storage Size (Gal)

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

Recovery (Gal/Hr)

Efficiency %

Fuel

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Tankless Tank

1 1

Storage Closet Storage Closet

Restrooms Restrooms

Ariston American

- 82-80H-450V

- 0144133321

- 80

- 4.5 kW

n/a

- 0.87 EF

Electric Electric

- 14

15 15

- 1

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 10 of 27

Page 83: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Storage Size (Gal)

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

Recovery (Gal/Hr)

Efficiency %

Fuel

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Tankless

1

Storage Closet

Restrooms

Ariston

-

-

-

-

n/a

-

Electric

-

15

-

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 11 of 27

Page 84: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Pumps

PumpsTag

Unit Type Base-mounted

Qty 2

Location Boiler Room

System Served Heating Hot Water

Manufacturer Armstrong

Model # 826768-000

Serial # 300251

Horse Power 5.0

Flow Rate (GPM) -

Head Pressure (FTHD) -

Motor Manufacturer Weg

Motor Frame 184T

Electrical Power (V/P/HZ)

208/230/60

Motor RPM 1755

Motor Efficiency % 87.5%

Pump VFD

Approx Age -

ASHRAE Service Life 18

Remaining Life -

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Yes No N/A

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 12 of 27

Page 85: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type Mini-Split Mini-Split Mini-Split

Qty 19 12 11

Location Roof Roof Ground

Area/Unit Served Classrooms Classrooms Classrooms

Manufacturer Fujitsu Fujitsu Fujitsu

Model No. AOU24R1A AOU24C3 AOU24R1A

Serial No.003134, 003139, 002997, 003136,

006307, 004991, 007162, 007163,

002152, 002196, 002204, 002155,

Refrigerant Type R-22 R-22 R-22

Cooling Capacity 2 2 2

Cooling Efficiency 10.3 EER 10.5 EER 10.3 EER

Volts / Phase / Hz 208/1/60 208/1/60 208/1/60

Approx Age - - -

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20 20

Remaining Life - - -

CommentsHeat Pump Heat Pump

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 13 of 27

Page 86: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type

Cooling Capacity

Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Mini-Split Mini-Split Mini-Split

6 1 1

Ground Ground Ground

Classrooms Arts Room Office

Fujitsu Fujitsu Fujitsu

AOU24C3 AOU36CX AOU18RLXFZ

006869, 006868, 006162, 007174,

001831 002027

R-22 R-22 R-410a

2 3 1.5

10.5 EER 9.39 EER 12.5 EER

208/1/60 208/1/60 208/1/60

- - -

20 20 20

- - -

Heat Pump

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 14 of 27

Page 87: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type

Cooling Capacity

Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Standard Air-Cooled Standard Air-Cooled

1 1

Ground Boiler Room

Walk-In Walk-In

Trenton Copeland

TES015L6-HT3A-F Copelametic

62206925 -

R-507

- -

- -

208/3/60

- -

20 20

- -

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 15 of 27

Page 88: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Large Exhaust Fans

Large Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type Up Blast Up Blast

Qty 2 1

Location Roof Roof

Area Served Hallway Hall

Manufacturer Penn Ventilator Penn Ventilator

Model # AC36 AC24

Motor (HP) 3 1 1/2

Electrical (V/H/P) - -

Approx Age - -

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20

Remaining Life - -

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 16 of 27

Page 89: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Transformers

TransformersTag

Unit Type Dry Type

Qty 1

Location Maintenance Office

Manufacturer GE

Catalog No. 9T23A3677

Serial No. n/a

Rating (kVA) 225.0

Electrical (V/H/P) 480/208/120/3

Impedance (%) -

Approx Age -

ASHRAE Service Life 25

Remaining Life -

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 17 of 27

Page 90: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type Reach-in Refrigerator Reach-in Refrigerator Reach-in Refrigerator

Qty 1 1 1

Location Multi-Purpose Multi-Purpose Kitchen

Manufacturer Glenco TRUE TRUE

Model No. - TMC-48-S-SS TMC-48-S-SS

Serial No. - 5097184 5256286

Fuel Electric Electric Electric

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 18 of 27

Page 91: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Reach-in Refrigerator Warming Cabinet Warming Cabinet

1 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

McCall Alto Shaam -

- 1000-UPS -

- 459954-000 -

Electric Electric Electric

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 19 of 27

Page 92: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Reach-in Refrigerator GriddleWalk-In

Cooler/Freezer

1 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

TRUE Vulcan Bally

T-72 78454 -

1-2188407 1255 -

Electric Natural Gas Electric

3 Door 80 MBH40 F, Fasco Fan

71633787, 115/1/2.1

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 20 of 27

Page 93: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Walk-In Cooler/Freezer

Kettle Steamer

1 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

Trenton Groen Cleveland

Smart Speed AN-40 Steam Craft Ultra 3

- - -

Electric Natural Gas Electric

9F, 2 Fan 100 MBH

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 21 of 27

Page 94: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Convection Oven Dishwasher Booster Dishwasher

1 1 1

Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

Blodgett Hatco Insinger

Dual Flow C15 Commander STMS 17

- - 671935

Natural Gas Electric Electric

15 kW

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 22 of 27

Page 95: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Air Compressor Air Dryer Electric Generator

1 1 1

Boiler Room Boiler Room Boiler Room

SpeedAire Hankison Onan

Duplex - -

- - -

Electric Electric Electric

2 x 1.5 hp

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 23 of 27

Page 96: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Computer Charging Racks

Computer Charging Racks

Copier

3 3 5

Hallways Hallways Hallways

Anthro - Kyocera

- -Ecosys P6030, 6021,

3135

- - -

Electric Electric Electric

36 mini-laptops 30 mini-laptops

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 24 of 27

Page 97: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Smart Boards CopierResidential Refrigerator

27 1 1

Classrooms Office Teachers Lounge

Epson Copystar Roper

Bright Link 575Wi CS6501i RT18BMXVLTI

- - EX2221509

Electric Electric Electric

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 25 of 27

Page 98: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Residential Refrigerator

Microwave Copier

1 2 1

Teachers Lounge Teachers Lounge Guidance

Hotpoint Magic Chef / Samsung Copystar

HTR15ABMBRWW - CS6500i

VA768598 - -

Electric Electric Electric

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 26 of 27

Page 99: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Water CoolersRefrigerated Vending

MachinesElectric Range

5 2 1

Hallways Teachers Lounge Teachers Lounge

Elkay and others - -

- - -

- - -

Electric Electric Electric

Appendix D - Major Equipment List - Maud Abrams School Page 27 of 27

Page 100: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX E

Page 101: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

CEG Project #:

Facility Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

1 Main Entrance 30004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 684

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 432 0.08 252 $26 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 11.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 YES -

1 Hallway 1 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 6 0.68 1,813

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 6 0.43 1,145 0.25 668 $69 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 286 $30 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 8.40

1 Hallway 2 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 4 0.46 1,208

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 4 0.29 763 0.17 445 $46 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 191 $20 $480.00 $228.00 $708.00 $80.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 12.60

1 Copy Room 40004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 912

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 576 0.08 336 $35 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 8.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Filing Room 40004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 912

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 576 0.08 336 $35 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 8.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Hallway 3 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 6 0.68 1,813

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 6 0.43 1,145 0.25 668 $69 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 286 $30 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 8.40

1 Nurse Office 40004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 7 0.80 3,192

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 7 0.50 2,016 0.29 1,176 $122 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $840.00 $399.00 $1,239.00 $140.00 8.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Hallway 4 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 6 0.68 1,813

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 6 0.43 1,145 0.25 668 $69 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 286 $30 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 8.40

1 Storage 7 4004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 91

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 58 0.08 34 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 89.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

25 Storage 6 400 Storage Round Light 2 120 1 0.12 48 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 2 27 1 0.03 11 0.09 37 $4 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $30.00 $10.00 $40.00 $20.00 5.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Storage 5 4004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 1 0.11 46

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 1 0.07 29 0.04 17 $2 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $120.00 $57.00 $177.00 $20.00 89.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Main Office 40002 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 10 0.62 2,480

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 10 0.27 1,080 0.35 1,400 $146 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $750.00 $427.50 $1,177.50 $150.00 7.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Main Office 40004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 912

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 576 0.08 336 $35 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 8.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Hallway 5 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 5 0.57 1,511

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 5 0.36 954 0.21 557 $58 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 239 $25 $600.00 $285.00 $885.00 $100.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 10.08

1 Class C-1 4004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 13 1.48 593

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 13 0.94 374 0.55 218 $23 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,560.00 $741.00 $2,301.00 $260.00 89.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 C-1-3 Bathroom 4002 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 3 0.19 74

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 3 0.08 32 0.11 42 $4 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 11 $1 $225.00 $128.25 $353.25 $45.00 70.57 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 84.79

1 Classroom C-3 26004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 13 1.48 3,853

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 13 0.94 2,434 0.55 1,420 $148 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,560.00 $741.00 $2,301.00 $260.00 13.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Classroom C-2 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 13 1.48 2,454

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 13 0.94 1,550 0.55 904 $94 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,560.00 $741.00 $2,301.00 $260.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 C-2-4 Bathroom 12002 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 3 0.19 223

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 3 0.08 97 0.11 126 $13 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 34 $4 $225.00 $128.25 $353.25 $45.00 23.52 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 22.61

1 Classrom C-4 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 13 1.48 2,454

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 13 0.94 1,550 0.55 904 $94 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,560.00 $741.00 $2,301.00 $260.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Library 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 24 1.97 3,259

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 24 0.86 1,431 1.10 1,828 $190 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $684.00 $2,124.00 $240.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Office 40002-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 1 0.08 328

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 1 0.04 144 0.05 184 $19 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 4.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

25 Storage 400 Storage Round Light 2 120 1 0.12 48 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 2 27 1 0.03 11 0.09 37 $4 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $30.00 $10.00 $40.00 $20.00 5.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class A-5 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 24 1.97 3,259

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 24 0.86 1,431 1.10 1,828 $190 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $684.00 $2,124.00 $240.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1C15173.00

Maud Abrams School

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

Cape May, NJ, 08204

714 Town Bank Road

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Maud Abrams School Page 1 of 5

Page 102: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

7 Bathroom 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 2 0.12 205

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 2 0.05 89 0.07 116 $12 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 31 $3 $150.00 $85.50 $235.50 $30.00 17.05 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 30.72

1 Bath Hall/Corridor 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 1 0.11 302

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 1 0.07 191 0.04 111 $12 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 67 $7 $120.00 $57.00 $177.00 $20.00 13.56 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 14.40

1 Hallway 7 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 604

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 382 0.08 223 $23 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 95 $10 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 25.20

1 Women 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 378

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 238 0.08 139 $14 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 83 $9 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 21.70 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 28.80

27 Teachers Lounge 30002-Lamp T8

1x4 Surface Mount2 62 3 0.19 558

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 3 0.11 324 0.08 234 $24 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 113 $12 $180.00 $85.50 $265.50 $30.00 9.68 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 8.48

27 Hallway 8 26502-Lamp T8

1x4 Surface Mount2 62 4 0.25 657

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 4 0.14 382 0.10 276 $29 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 95 $10 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 10.96 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 25.20

28 Hallway 9 26503-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount3 93 12 1.12 2,957

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

3 54 12 0.65 1,717 0.47 1,240 $129 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

2 25.0% 429 $45 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 10.96 $400.00 $100.00 $500.00 FALSE 11.20

4 Class B-9 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 4 0.33 543

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 4 0.14 238 0.18 305 $32 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-10 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 4 0.33 543

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 4 0.14 238 0.18 305 $32 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-1 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-3 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-2 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-4 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-5 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-6 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-7 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class B-8 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 22 1.80 2,987

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 22 0.79 1,312 1.01 1,676 $174 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class C-6 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 Bathroom 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 1 0.08 30 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $10.00 $25.00 $10.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 1 0.08 30 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $10.00 $25.00 $10.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Classroom C-5 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

27 Hallway 6 26502-Lamp T8

1x4 Surface Mount2 62 3 0.19 493

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 3 0.11 286 0.08 207 $21 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

0 25.0% 72 $7 $180.00 $85.50 $265.50 $30.00 10.96 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

30 Cafeteria/Auditorium 2650 Cafeteria Lights 1 285 24 6.84 18,126 Remove & Replace New Fixture.

CREE High Output CXB Series 18,000 Lumen High-Bay

Luminaire W/Acrylic Reflector and Drop Lens

1 160 24 3.84 10,176 3.00 7,950 $827 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

6 35.0% 3,562 $370 $10,728.00 $7,920.00 $18,648.00 $3,600.00 18.20 $1,200.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $35.00 3.96

29 Cafeteria/Auditorium 2650 Stage Lights 1 63 8 0.50 1,336 Existing to Remain N/A 1 63 0 0.50 1,336 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Maud Abrams School Page 2 of 5

Page 103: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

26 Cust Closet 1 400 Storage Light 1 75 1 0.08 30 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $10.00 $25.00 $10.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 Storage 1 400 Storage Light 1 75 1 0.08 30 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $10.00 $25.00 $10.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 Men 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

8 Men 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

4 Class A-1 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 18 1.48 2,444

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 18 0.65 1,073 0.83 1,371 $143 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 A-1 Bathroom 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

4 Class A-3a 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 A-3a Bathroom 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

4 Class A-4a 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 A-4a Bathroom 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

4 Class A-3b 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class A-4b 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

28 Hallway 26503-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount3 93 3 0.28 739

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

3 54 3 0.16 429 0.12 310 $32 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 107 $11 $270.00 $128.25 $398.25 $45.00 10.96 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 22.40

1 Girls 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 378

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 238 0.08 139 $14 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 83 $9 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 21.70 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 28.80

23 Girls 1656 Sink Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 46.08

1 Boys 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 378

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 238 0.08 139 $14 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 83 $9 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 21.70 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 24.77

23 Boys 1656 Sink Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 5

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -

Remote Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 115.21

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 2 0.15 60 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 2 0.03 11 0.12 49 $5 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $30.00 $20.00 $50.00 $20.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Hallway 26502 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 11 0.68 1,807

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 11 0.30 787 0.39 1,020 $106 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

2 25.0% 197 $20 $825.00 $470.25 $1,295.25 $165.00 10.65 $400.00 $100.00 $500.00 $35.00 22.72

1 Boys 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 378

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 238 0.08 139 $14 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 83 $9 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 21.70 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 28.80

7 Boys 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 1 0.06 103

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 1 0.03 45 0.04 58 $6 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 16 $2 $75.00 $42.75 $117.75 $15.00 17.05 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 61.44

1 Girls 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 378

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 238 0.08 139 $14 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 83 $9 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 21.70 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 28.80

7 Girls 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 1 0.06 103

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 1 0.03 45 0.04 58 $6 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 35.0% 16 $2 $75.00 $42.75 $117.75 $15.00 17.05 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 FALSE 61.44

7 Restroom 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 1 0.06 103

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 1 0.03 45 0.04 58 $6 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 16 $2 $75.00 $42.75 $117.75 $15.00 17.05 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 153.61

1 Class E-2a 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 5 0.57 944

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 5 0.36 596 0.21 348 $36 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $600.00 $285.00 $885.00 $100.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Maud Abrams School Page 3 of 5

Page 104: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

1 Class E-1a 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 5 0.57 944

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 5 0.36 596 0.21 348 $36 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $600.00 $285.00 $885.00 $100.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Class E-2b 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 5 0.57 944

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 5 0.36 596 0.21 348 $36 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $600.00 $285.00 $885.00 $100.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Class E-1b 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 5 0.57 944

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 5 0.36 596 0.21 348 $36 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $600.00 $285.00 $885.00 $100.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Class E-3 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 9 1.03 1,699

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 9 0.65 1,073 0.38 626 $65 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Class E-4 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 9 1.03 1,699

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 9 0.65 1,073 0.38 626 $65 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Class E-7 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 9 1.03 1,699

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 9 0.65 1,073 0.38 626 $65 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Class E-5 16564-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 9 1.03 1,699

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 9 0.65 1,073 0.38 626 $65 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 21.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Hallway 26502 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 9 0.56 1,479

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 9 0.24 644 0.32 835 $87 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $675.00 $384.75 $1,059.75 $135.00 10.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-6 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 9 1.48 2,444

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 9 0.65 1,073 0.83 1,371 $143 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-8 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 9 1.48 2,444

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 9 0.65 1,073 0.83 1,371 $143 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $513.00 $1,593.00 $180.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Hallway 26504-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 11 1.80 4,781

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 11 0.79 2,099 1.01 2,682 $279 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,320.00 $627.00 $1,947.00 $220.00 6.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Boys 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 2 0.33 543

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 238 0.18 305 $32 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Girls 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 3 0.49 815

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 3 0.22 358 0.28 457 $48 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $171.00 $531.00 $60.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-9 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 6 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 6 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-10 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 12 1.97 3,259

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 12 0.86 1,431 1.10 1,828 $190 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $684.00 $2,124.00 $240.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-11A 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 6 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 6 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-11b 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 6 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 6 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-13 16564-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 12 1.97 3,259

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 12 0.86 1,431 1.10 1,828 $190 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $684.00 $2,124.00 $240.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Class E-12 26004-Lamp T12

2x4 Surface Mount4 164 12 1.97 5,117

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 12 0.86 2,246 1.10 2,870 $299 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $684.00 $2,124.00 $240.00 6.31 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Kitchen 6004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 8 0.91 547

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 8 0.58 346 0.34 202 $21 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $960.00 $456.00 $1,416.00 $160.00 59.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

31 Kitchen 600 Kitchen Hood 1 75 4 0.30 180 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 4 0.05 32 0.25 148 $15 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $40.00 $100.00 $40.00 3.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Storage 4004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 91

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 58 0.08 34 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 89.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 1 0.08 30 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $10.00 $25.00 $10.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 2 0.15 60 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 2 0.03 11 0.12 49 $5 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $30.00 $20.00 $50.00 $20.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

8 Bath 1656 Bathroom Light 2 62 1 0.06 103 Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line

voltage18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen,

4000K2 36 1 0.04 60 0.03 43 $4 5

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -

Remote Mnt.1 35.0% 21 $2 $60.00 $28.50 $88.50 $10.00 17.53 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 115.21

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Maud Abrams School Page 4 of 5

Page 105: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

26 Boiler 1656 Storage Light 1 75 7 0.53 869 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 7 0.09 156 0.43 713 $74 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $105.00 $70.00 $175.00 $70.00 1.42 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Hall D 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 3 0.34 906

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 3 0.22 572 0.13 334 $35 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 200 $21 $360.00 $171.00 $531.00 $60.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 12.00

1 Hall D2 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 5 0.57 1,511

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 5 0.36 954 0.21 557 $58 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 239 $25 $600.00 $285.00 $885.00 $100.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 8.67

4 Electrical 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 3 0.25 407

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 3 0.11 179 0.14 229 $24 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $180.00 $85.50 $265.50 $30.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class D-2 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 13 1.07 1,765

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 13 0.47 775 0.60 990 $103 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $780.00 $370.50 $1,150.50 $130.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Bathroom 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 3 0.19 308

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 3 0.08 134 0.11 174 $18 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 47 $5 $225.00 $128.25 $353.25 $45.00 17.05 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 51.20

4 Class D-4 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 13 1.07 1,765

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 13 0.47 775 0.60 990 $103 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $780.00 $370.50 $1,150.50 $130.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class D-1 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 13 1.07 1,765

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 13 0.47 775 0.60 990 $103 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $780.00 $370.50 $1,150.50 $130.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Bathroom 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 3 0.19 308

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 3 0.08 134 0.11 174 $18 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 47 $5 $225.00 $128.25 $353.25 $45.00 17.05 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 51.20

4 Class D-3 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 13 1.07 1,765

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 13 0.47 775 0.60 990 $103 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $780.00 $370.50 $1,150.50 $130.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Class D-5 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

7 Bathroom 16562 ULamp T8

2x2 Ceiling Mount2 62 3 0.19 308

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage (3-Lamp 2')

9w 2' LED Tube 950 lumen, 4000K

3 27 3 0.08 134 0.11 174 $18 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 35.0% 47 $5 $225.00 $128.25 $353.25 $45.00 17.05 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 51.20

4 Class D-6 16562-Lamp T12

1x4 Pendant Mount2 82 12 0.98 1,630

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

2 36 12 0.43 715 0.55 914 $95 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $342.00 $1,062.00 $120.00 9.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 2 0.15 60 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 2 0.03 11 0.12 49 $5 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $30.00 $20.00 $50.00 $20.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

26 Storage 400 Storage Light 1 75 1 0.08 30 Relamp CREE 75W - A19 1 13.5 1 0.01 5 0.06 25 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $10.00 $25.00 $10.00 5.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Hall D3 8004-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 3 0.34 274

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 3 0.22 173 0.13 101 $10 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

0 25.0% 43 $4 $360.00 $171.00 $531.00 $60.00 44.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE 0.00

1 Hall C-3 26504-Lamp T8

2x4 Surface Mount4 114 2 0.23 604

Re-lamp to LED Tube w/ line voltage

18w 4' LED Tube 2250 lumen, 4000K

4 72 2 0.14 382 0.08 223 $23 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 25.0% 95 $10 $240.00 $114.00 $354.00 $40.00 13.56 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 25.20

18 Exterior 3000 Flood Lights 1 120 3 0.36 1,080 Replace FixtureLithonia Lighting OLB Bullet

Flood1 10.5 3 0.03 95 0.33 986 $102 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $411.00 $30.00 $441.00 $60.00 3.72 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

17 Exterior 3000High Pressure Sodium

Vapors1 61 3 0.18 549 Replace Fixture RAB VANLED40 1 40 3 0.12 360 0.06 189 $20 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $810.00 $270.00 $1,080.00 $300.00 39.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

19 Exterior 3000 Directional MH 1 175 6 1.05 3,150 Replace FixtureRAB LED Floodlight FFLED

39W1 39 6 0.23 702 0.82 2,448 $255 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,830.00 $690.00 $2,520.00 $600.00 7.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

20 Exterior 3000High Pressure Sodium

Vapors1 116 14 1.62 4,872 Replace Fixture RAB Slim26N/PC or PC2 1 26 14 0.36 1,092 1.26 3,780 $393 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,646.00 $1,260.00 $3,906.00 $1,400.00 6.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Exterior 3000High Pressure Sodium

Vapors1 173 4 0.69 2,076 Replace Fixture RAB Slim26N/PC or PC2 1 26 4 0.10 312 0.59 1,764 $183 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $756.00 $360.00 $1,116.00 $400.00 3.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

16 Exterior 3000 Overhead Incandescent 1 25 5 0.13 375 Existing to Remain N/A 1 25 0 0.13 375 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

TOTAL 855 88.0 170,789 842 43 84,057 45.0 86,732 $9,020 46 13 7,472 $777 $81,186 $41,346 $122,532 $17,355 11.66 $7,100 $2,300 $9,400 $160.00 11.89

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Maud Abrams School Page 5 of 5

Page 106: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX F

Page 107: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Fuel Fuel type 1 Fuel type 2 Fuel type 3 Fuel type 4 Fuel type 5 Fuel type 6

Fuel type ElectricityNatural gas -

thermFuel consumption - unit MWh therm #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/AFuel rate - unit $/kWh $/therm #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/AFuel rate 0.104 1.150

Schedule Unit Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3 Schedule 4 Schedule 5 Schedule 6Description 24/7 Mabrams

Occupied Occupied Occupied Occupied OccupiedTemperature - space heating °F 72.0 72.0Temperature - space cooling °F 74.0 74.0

Unoccupied Unoccupied Unoccupied Unoccupied UnoccupiedTemperature - unoccupied +/-°F 4.0

Occupied Occupied Occupied Occupied OccupiedOccupancy rate - daily h/d h/d h/d h/d h/d h/dMonday 24 12.0Tuesday 24 12.0Wednesday 24 12.0Thursday 24 12.0Friday 24 12.0Saturday 24 0.0Sunday 24 0.0Occupancy rate - annual h/yr 8,760 3,129 0 0 0 0

% 100% 36% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Heating/cooling changeover temperature °F 65.0Length of heating season d 216Length of cooling season d 149

Show: Heating Cooling ElectricityIncremental initial

costs Fuel cost savingsIncremental O&M

savings Simple paybackInclude

measure?Fuel saved GJ GJ GJ $ $ $ yr Heating system

0 - - 0 0 0 0.0 Cooling system

- 0 - 0 0 0 - Building envelope

82 33 - 0 1,843 0 0.0 VentilationLightsElectrical equipmentHot waterPumpsFansMotorsProcess electricityProcess heatProcess steamSteam lossesHeat recoveryCompressed airRefrigerationOtherTotal 82 33 0 0 1,843 0 0.00

Fuel type

Fuel consumption -

unit Fuel rateFuel

consumption Fuel costFuel

consumption Fuel cost Fuel saved Fuel cost savings

Electricity MWh 104.000$ 18.0 1,869$ 8.9 924$ 9.1 945$ Natural gas therm 1.150$ 483,076.3 555,538$ 482,296.1 554,641$ 780.2 897$ Total 557,407$ 555,564$ 1,843$

Project verificationFuel

consumptionFuel type Base caseElectricity MWh 18.0Natural gas therm 483,076.3

Heating Cooling Electricity TotalFuel consumption GJ GJ GJ GJFuel consumption - base case 50,967 65 0 51,032Fuel consumption - proposed case 50,885 32 0 50,917Fuel saved 82 33 0 115Fuel saved - % 0.2% 50.6% 0.2% Show data

Benchmark ComparisonEnergy unit GJ Country - regionReference unit m² Facility typeUser-defined m² 2,000 Type

DescriptionBenchmark Heating Cooling Electricity Total Fuel consumption kWh/m²Fuel consumption GJ/m² GJ/m² GJ/m² GJ/m² Show alternative unitsFuel consumption - base case #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Energy unitFuel consumption - proposed case #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Reference unitFuel saved #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Fuel consumption kWh/m²

Show dataSummary

Fuel consumption -

unit

Fuel consumption -

variance

0

See benchmark database

kWh

Energy efficiency measures projectFuels & schedules Show data

Facility characteristics Show data

RETScreen Energy Model - Energy efficiency measures project

Base case Proposed case Fuel cost savingsFuel

Fuel consumption -

historical

Window FilmMaud Abrams

10/9/2015RETScreen4-1

Page 108: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

Emission Analysis

Base case electricity system (Baseline)

GHG emissionfactor

(excl. T&D)T&D

lossesGHG emission

factorCountry - region Fuel type tCO2/MWh % tCO2/MWhCanada All types 0.196 0.196

GHG emissionBase case tCO2 2,537.7Proposed case tCO2 2,531.8Gross annual GHG emission reduction tCO2 5.9GHG credits transaction fee %Net annual GHG emission reduction tCO2 5.9 is equivalent to 1.1

GHG reduction incomeGHG reduction credit rate $/tCO2

Financial parametersInflation rate %Project life yrDebt ratio %

Initial costsEnergy efficiency measures $ 0Other $Total initial costs $ 0 0.0%

Incentives and grants $

Annual costs and debt paymentsO&M (savings) costs $ 0Fuel cost - proposed case $ 555,564Other $Total annual costs $ 555,564

Annual savings and incomeFuel cost - base case $ 557,407Other $Total annual savings and income $ 557,407

Financial viabilityPre-tax IRR - assets %Simple payback yr 0.0Equity payback yr

Financial Analysis

Cu

mu

lati

ve

ca

sh

flo

ws

($

)

Year

Cumulative cash flows graph

Cars & light trucks not used

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0 1

Window FilmMaud Abrams

10/9/2015RETScreen4-1

Page 109: FACILITY ENERGY REPORT · Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 1C15173 December 11, 2015 – FINAL Page 2 of 51 I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has

10/9/2015

RETScreen4‐1

Window Film

Maud Abrams