FACILITATING THE BIM COORDINATOR WITH AUTOMATED DATA COMPLIANCE CHECKING

Click here to load reader

download FACILITATING THE BIM COORDINATOR WITH AUTOMATED DATA COMPLIANCE CHECKING

of 31

  • date post

    10-Feb-2017
  • Category

    Technology

  • view

    501
  • download

    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of FACILITATING THE BIM COORDINATOR WITH AUTOMATED DATA COMPLIANCE CHECKING

  • FACILITATING THE BIM COORDINATOR WITH AUTOMATED DATA COMPLIANCE CHECKING ILS check in BIMserver.org | Lon van Berlo

  • Berlo, Papadonikolaki 2016

  • Berlo, Papadonikolaki 2016

    Drie soorten data checks Data compliance Data aggregation Design/engineering cordination

  • Berlo, Papadonikolaki 2016

    Drie soorten data checks Data compliance Data aggregation Design/engineering coordination

    Toeleveranciers

    Aannemer

  • Berlo, Papadonikolaki 2016

  • Berlo, Papadonikolaki 2016

    HYPOTHESE

    Automatische data check bij data overdracht zorgt ervoor dat: Betere data beschikbaar komen Cordinator meer focus heeft op zn daadwerkelijke taak

  • EXPERIMENT

    1. Onderzoek naar veel voorkomende datachecks

    2. Plug-in in BIMserver

    3. Drie projecten getest

    4. Publicatie geschreven

    5. Officile presentatie in september

  • COMMON REQUIREMENTS

    There should be only one IfcProject object per file (no more, no less);

    There should be only one IfcSite object per file;

    All objects should be linked to an IfcBuildingStorey object;

    There should be at least one IfcBuilding object in the dataset;

    There should be at least one IfcBuildingStorey in the dataset;

    The naming of the building storeys should be consistent and in order, i.e. floor-numbers;

    The length unit should be millimeters; The area unit in m2; The volume unit m3;

    The objects should be close to the origin point (0,0,0) of the dataset;

    Objects found across multiple aspect/reference models should have the same position and

    orientation point;

    There should be no intersections in the individual aspect models;

    There should be no duplicate objects in the entire dataset.

  • AANVULLENDE EISEN

    Typische EXTRA eisen vanuit een opdrachtgever / beheerder / eigenaar:

    The dataset should have the true North set; The site elevation should be set; The site latitude and longitude coordinates should be set; The site cadaster ID should be available.

  • EN NATUURLIJK DE ILS

  • UITEINDELIJKE TEST:

    1. Is there one (and only one) IfcProject object? 2. Is there one (and only one) IfcSite object? 3. Are all objects linked to an IfcBuildingStorey object? 4. Is there at least one IfcBuilding object? 5. Is there at least one IfcBuildingStorey? 6. Is the naming of the building storeys in order (numbers)? 7. Is the length unit in millimeters? 8. Is the area unit in square meters? 9. Is the volume unit in cubic meters? 10.Does the dataset have the true North set? 11.Is the site elevation set? 12.Are the site latitude and longitude coordinates set? 13.Is the site cadaster ID available?

  • DRIE PROJECTEN

    Schependomlaan Twee andere (anoniem)

    Genoemd: Case A (schependomlaan), B en C

  • PROTOTYPE

  • PROTOTYPE

  • CRUCIALE PUNT

    Voorheen: Per e-mail/dropbox/sharepoint/whatever data opsturen

    Nu: Uploaden naar website en niet geaccepteerd worden als data interne fouten bevat.

  • CRUCIALE PUNT

    Voorheen: Per e-mail/dropbox/sharepoint/whatever data opsturen

    Nu: Uploaden naar website en niet geaccepteerd worden als data interne fouten bevat. Gedachtegang is dat het over de schutting gooien gedrag wordt belemmerd en de verantwoordelijkheid van goede datasets bij de bron komt/blijft. (zodat de cordinator niet met het de gebakken peren zit)

  • 1. Is there a IfcProject object? 2. Is there one IfcSite object? 3. Are all objects linked to an

    IfcBuildingStorey object? 4. Is there at least one

    IfcBuilding? 5. Is there at least one

    IfcBuildingStorey? 6. Is the naming of the building

    storeys in order (numbers)? 7. Is the length unit in millimeters? 8. Is the area unit in m2? 9. Is the volume unit in m3? 10. Does the dataset have the true

    North set? 11. Is the site elevation set? 12. Are the site latitude and

    longitude coordinates set? 13. Is the site cadaster ID

    available?

  • 1. Is there a IfcProject object? 2. Is there one IfcSite object? 3. Are all objects linked to an

    IfcBuildingStorey object? 4. Is there at least one

    IfcBuilding? 5. Is there at least one

    IfcBuildingStorey? 6. Is the naming of the building

    storeys in order (numbers)? 7. Is the length unit in millimeters? 8. Is the area unit in m2? 9. Is the volume unit in m3? 10. Does the dataset have the true

    North set? 11. Is the site elevation set? 12. Are the site latitude and

    longitude coordinates set? 13. Is the site cadaster ID

    available?

  • 1. Is there a IfcProject object? 2. Is there one IfcSite object? 3. Are all objects linked to an

    IfcBuildingStorey object? 4. Is there at least one

    IfcBuilding? 5. Is there at least one

    IfcBuildingStorey? 6. Is the naming of the building

    storeys in order (numbers)? 7. Is the length unit in millimeters? 8. Is the area unit in m2? 9. Is the volume unit in m3? 10. Does the dataset have the true

    North set? 11. Is the site elevation set? 12. Are the site latitude and

    longitude coordinates set? 13. Is the site cadaster ID

    available?

  • 1. Is there a IfcProject object? 2. Is there one IfcSite object? 3. Are all objects linked to an

    IfcBuildingStorey object? 4. Is there at least one

    IfcBuilding? 5. Is there at least one

    IfcBuildingStorey? 6. Is the naming of the building

    storeys in order (numbers)? 7. Is the length unit in millimeters? 8. Is the area unit in m2? 9. Is the volume unit in m3? 10. Does the dataset have the true

    North set? 11. Is the site elevation set? 12. Are the site latitude and

    longitude coordinates set? 13. Is the site cadaster ID

    available?

  • CONCLUSIE & DISCUSSIE

    Best goede data

    Niet alles eenduidig te toetsen (benaming van verdiepingen)

    Nog steeds geen inzicht in potentie Whereas this study has shown the potential of online automated compliance checking, there is

    no clear evidence that the quality of models will improve in the process. Further research would

    be required across multiple projects to validate this hypothesis.

    Misschien komt er wel geen data meer van een toeleverancier omdat de drempel te hoog is; dan levert dat juist extra problemen op.

  • OPEN UITNODIGING

    Zouden graag verder willen onderzoeken in een live project Kijken naar gedrag van toeleveranciers Wellicht ook eenvoudige automatische coordinatie tussen toeleveranciers Misschien zelfs online BCF dashboard koppelen voor issue management

    Interesse? Leon.vanBerlo@tno.nl of 06-42367465

  • DE TNO STAP TE VER

    Data automatisch corrigeren Meters naar milimeters Lat/lon overnemen van hoofdmodel Nulpunt corrigeren Etc

    Beter vastleggen van eisen met methode die voor computer eenduidig is (query taal; ruleset; Model View Definitions, concept bibliotheken, enz)

  • FAQ

    Ja, de broncode van de plug-in is gratis te downloaden: github.com/opensourcebim (en komt standaard in de 2.0 versie van BIMserver)

    Nee, formeel mag ik de paper niet e-mailen

    Nee, deze 3 cases zeggen niks over de hele sector en zijn niet te generaliseren

    Ja, ik denk dat er ook potentie zit om dit concept toe te passen op andere plaatsen in het proces (dus niet alleen tussen aannemers en toeleveranciers)

  • BEDANKT VOOR UW AANDACHT