42E05SW0003 2.10458 BARBARA LAKE

Proton Magnetometer

and

YLF Electromagnetic

Surveys

Newkirk-Dunvegan Project

NTS ^2-E-5

Phantom Exploration Services Ltd

010

THUNDER BAYMININC D IV;';i'^i

f i D ft (ft [CfiMfr r fn IL ^ [r; li W i.;far*''rffj

Sept., 198? R. D. Middaugh

M/iV/NG LANDS SECTION

INTRODUCTION

Armeno Resources Inc. of Vancouver, B.C. contracted

Phantom Exploration Services Ltd. of Thunder Bay, Ontario

to conduct magnetic and electromagnetic (VLF) surveys

on their Newkirk-Dunvegan Project during the summer of 198?,

LOCATION, ACCESS AND GRIPPING

The survey area is located approximately 15 km

east southeast of Orient Bay, Ontario. The area is

protected by 8 unpatented mining claims numbered TB

82^969-97^ inclusive and TB 863^18-^-19 inclusive,

which are located in the Thunder Bay mining division.

The property is reached by travelling northeast

on the Gore Creek Road from highway #11 for ^ kilometers.

From this point an old haul road leads easterly for

about 9 kilometers. From this point a good walking

trail leads north for about 2 kilometers to the grid.

The grid was established by Phantom Exploration

personnell. Approximately 11.? kilometers of line was

cut, chained and picketted at 25 meter intervals. The

base line was orientated east west while north south

wing lines were cut at 120 meter intervals along it.

-2-

PERSONNELL

The day to day work and the overall supervision

of the geophysical program was carried out by R. D.

Middaugh of Phantom Exploration Services Ltd.

INSTRUMENTATION

Magnetic

A proton precession magnetometer (model omni IV)

manufactured by EDA Instruments of Toronto, Ontario

was used for this survey. The total field was read

with a resolution of one gamma and all the field

values were corrected for diurnal variations using

another omni IV magnetometer in the base station

mode. Readings were recorded at 25 meter intervals

on the grid lines.

Electromagnetic

A VLF EM-16 unit manufactured by Geonics

Limited of Mississauga, Ontario was used for this

survey. Both in and out of phase components were

recorded at 25 meter intervals on the grid lines.

The transmitter station used was Cutler, Maine

with a frequency of 24.0 KHz.

-3-

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

Magnetic

The grid area is presented in plan form

at a scale of l j 2500. The corrected magnetic

data is plotted on this map and contoured at

50 gamma intervals.

Although no regional gradient is evident,

the relatively flat magnetic data does indicate

that the underlying rocks exhibit a weak east

west regional magnetic trend. The most prominent

feature is located in the north east corner of

the property and represents a small portion of

what is left of an extensive diabase sill that

once covered the whole area. The other moderate

features probably reflect compositional variations

in the underlying metasediments.

Electromagnetic

The survey area is presented in plan form at

a scale of 1:2500 with a vertical scale set at l

cm ^ lOfo for the EM profiles.

The few conductive trends located within the

survey area are characterized by short or discon

tinuous strike lengths and poor conductivity and

seem to be coincident with topographic low swampy

areas.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The survey area is underlain for the most part

by metasediments that exhibit a weak east west regional

magnetic trend. The exception is a small area of dibase

located in the north east part of the property.

The conductive trends located seem to be caused

by low swampy topographic features.

The original concept of attempting to locate and

delineate lithium bearing pegmatites using these geo

physical methods does not seem to work in this geological

setting. Grass roots prospecting and mapping are the best

and seemingly only ways to locate these pegmatites.

Since the pegmatites have been located by earlier

work, future programs should concentrate on evaluating

the potential of these deposits through drilling and

sampling, given that a suitable market for the lithium

products has be procured.

Submitted by

Phantom Exploration Services Ltd.

R. D. Middaugh

Geologist

APPENDIX

Map 1. Location Map

Map 2. VLF Survey Profiles

Map 3- Magnetometer Survey

MmiMryo- Report of WorkNatural l f, . . r . . . Resources IGeophys.cal. Geoloy.cal.

Gcoch^icald-iciExnofv-;-

v/-

42Eessweee3 a.10458 BARBARA LAKE 300

!f 6~'

Survey-//77

.Narr*e anc; Adrl'css of Author (of Geo Technical reno'* 1

F /far

To'ai M.ies ci

//.7

Credits Requested per Each Claim In Columns at rig 1 '.; '.'^,- --. C airns Traversed jList in numerical sequence)Spec'a' P 'Ovsions

For firsl survey

Enter 40 d^ys. (This includes hoe cutting/

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days Ifor each*

Geophysical

- Magnetomete

Raciiometrir

Othe'

Geological

, Geochem.cal

Man Days

Compieie ft'v^rse side,, i .

and ente' total(s) here- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

Other

Geological

Geochernicai

Airborne Creditf

Note- Spocial ti'C'.if'ons E"""o'"aq'-t -

c'^rMs tlo not npply to A. -1)0---' b-^'v"yi. Vagne:o'"fH-

Radiometric

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Certiycation VerHying Report of Workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge ol tho f.icu set fort "i in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the iinnoxf-ci ITXV* ^ T rue

Name.*j**-Pw*taJAddress of Person Certifying

"t^' (S -

1362 ( RI PI

November 19, 1987 Your Filet Our Filer

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines435 Janes Street SouthP.O. Box 5000 .v ; V*\ Y^--- ''.-'r'Thunder Bay, OntarioPTC 506

Dear Madam:

RES

4462.10458

Notice of Intent dated November 4, 1987 - Geophysical (Electromagnetic fi Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims TB 824969 et al in the Barbara Lake Area.

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.Yours sincerely, ' ' '' ' "' - ''"'' : V :; '" : ' " : '* : "'^ '' ; "'""' v ' : ' ;

W.R. Cowan, Manager Mining Lands Section Mines fi Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Boom 6610Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3^telephones (416) 965-4888

FMt se

ccs Armono Besources Inc.2600 -1177 W. Hastings St. Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3Y3

ccs Mr. G.H. FergusonMining fi Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

ccs Mr. R.D. Middaugh 736 Alice Avenue' .' ' ' R.R. 114

Thunder Bay, Ontario. P7B 5E5 :': : ,,:, ;-; .; "ccs Resident Geologist

Thunder Bay, Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Date

November 4, 1987

File

2.10458Mining Recorder's Report of Work No.

446

Recorded Holder

Armeno Resources Inc.Township or Area

Barbara Lake

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 40

RprtrnmaQnAtir Hays

20Magnetometer... ,, . Hays

InH^e^ polc'i'at'on . fky*

flthpr riays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological Hays

fipnrhemiral Hays

Man days fi Airborne l j

Special provision (x] Ground 0

l | Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

[~l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 824969 - 974 863418

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

30 Days Electromagnetic and 15 Days Magnetometer

TB 863419

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.

res/)?)

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)

'BftgQflg/4

Survey Company

Author of Report

Address of Author Trtuug^

Covering Dates of Survey-

Total Miles of Line Cut_

(linecuttinq to office)

H. IfT

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

^ , . , Geophysical

Electromagnetic

DAYS per claim

Radiometric

-Other

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer .Electromagnetic Radiometric

AQthoV of Report or Ageit

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

Rf C l:

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

"Z.

l

AM

VED•t-

MININGTOTAL CLAIMS.

837 ( 5/79)

IND

UC

ED P

OLA

RIZ

ATI

ON

RES

ISTI

VIT

Y

-2 13 rt O *-^

rt rt"

o 3 o. rt

Electrode "B 3

Q- ^

:t*1

*X3

i—

ora

^|g

srt ta

ngrt S O rt

00 rt

S 0 3

O

O. D H rt O

O

w r* •1 i B

Drt

rt

J2

.QC

Crt

rt3

3n

rt O

o

GR

AV

ITY

Elevatio 3

B3 1 •-I p o

rt O) r* o' 3 i rt a) 3 O. o" s f-*

- o' 3

O

y

3*

i s.

iS

f* S

S.

8 3

O

3

2 S

3 S

o. rt

E -

ELEC

TRO

MA

GN

ETIC

MA

GN

ETIC

1Parameter

s measur rt o. ^ C ^- k H C*

~5~"*

1 ^1 ^ 1

ffi I

JO s ^ •o •i a* tj •^ S

Method:

Fr

en ii en rv P rt

r ~

t- ^

s-

en^

i. r*"

r*

rt

"^

J* S

n o o r* cr k1 x H 3 rt D *v ft) S. rt" 5' rt

Coil

configuration

Coil

separation ——

Arnirary H ^

^ ^s^

^J\

-o o

1 Instrument -w 0 5 A tP ^ •~ ^ C

Accuracy — Scale

i

Diurnal

correction

Base

Station

check

Base

Station

locati 8 *

g 1

1 1

r 1

rf-

*^

O-

r*

i S

rt *— *. o c M

N--^

,'T

y rt. Hr •^ o s ^ S t) rj

/•f 1 \

x ^

Instrument /fi c^ ^ ~0 \J c* N

^^

'

^ ^ •k ?i 4 J ^ 5^ 5 b * cf —

Contour

interval "2 i~* ^r |V

L J C ^O 1 t ^ r— T7 rj, ** j; 0 Q

^

Number

of

Stations

-Station

interva

l P } T/ W A

C r" ^r i XT g cs fi ~1 0? rf w

O"

T3

rt

ja

^

2.

Oy

^

*(ra

5d S o- CT

Q en

i3 0 s m -f /n 'i) l/}

V

M^ r- " A u* — 5o 9* i

^GROUND

SURVEY C/3 1 SJ 3 o S r* 3 3

0

rt

W

g

^

1

3

•o S

l

?•?

H

o.

W-

Qp

KS1

2

rt "

J

0o

*^n

j^0 en C i < ^

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_________________________________________ Range. Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.

Values measuredEnergy windows (levels) ________,——————————.^———.-————————Height of instrument——————.-——-——-—^—-...^—...-—.—Background Count.Size of detector.^——.^——-————-—————-..-^———™———.—-..——.—.—...—.Overburden —————.-——..^-—----^—————-——-——————.^-—————.^—-.—-

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey—.^—.———————^^————.——Instrument ——————-——^^————^—-—^————.

Accuracy^—-———-—^--—————^——.^———.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)———— Instrument(s) ——————

(specify for each type of lurvey) Accuracy———-^———-————-——

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used^———————-——-—————--^—.———.—.....——-

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area——————..—..——.———.^————.-—— Over claims only-

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

C.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————. Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

n nD

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others —————————————^—-—^—..^—Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -^—————.^

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis—-——

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used __

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method ——Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General. General.

#m

mt-V--'-^v.'

,", ^ro O)

UJ

j-

L/'

•••^•ftm'4;^

##f

y^TT'.y^.i* ;i Tr^vJifn v'^4^?:wv..-v--.y.'.'-'.•'.^l .v.-.

V.-

'C^,:;.^.v;i-i'.'.- " - -; 1 - " -", ..:

'.•-'•V-^'

SM.^4^- .: -,v

v-.y- .;:: *.

*™,t '.,' - - ' *

-•' l '•' ~ * .

:-'.:, '^^- Ifr* *; r p v-. *'a.*-''/.'. ,*.^* *-j'*.~, ••-. ".'•V, , .. * . . v, ' * ' .1 ...' .H&•*'*mWW* /••^•r -;- j,

v^^VA-c'.?;^imi-.*^,v*^^:;:.".y;^.-;Yt,^.vfv.7;.

^iPPPM:?^i^^^^i^^^^^ s^^^^^l^^**;*^#iti^iiti^

jjKJOfan. tn vg Ft^nwujgmiiaejajjta

LAKE JEAN G-6463?QO B7?45'

45 0 22' 30 49 0 22 30

42ES5SWMe3 2.10458 BARBARA LAKE 200 COSGRAVE LAKE G- i--

LO

O

LU

LU

LGENLD

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER UNESMARSH OR MLJSKEGM-'NES

CANCELLED PATENTED S. R. O.

h

NOTES

THUNDER BAYMINING DIVISION

AMPM

i

AREA

.^ ?wa^

f/:.'.'.B. AOfti:M;5THATfVE DISTRICT

- -

i "S s r1, i •r***. 51" p^ p", jan U S'-, L* t. H B A

LAND TITLES/ REGiSTBV DIVISION

T'": .^, V-j 4-7 i w is/ &S.- n w

Land

O^t^ri.^ ••^.-'. . i-.^. i .^,

c

4335

B.L. 0 + 00

1+00 S

2 + 00 S

3 + 00 S

4 + 00 S

5 + 00 S

6+00 S

7 + 00 S

8+00 S

OCVJ

Ut

B L. 0 + 00

l 4- 00 S

2 + O OS

3+OOS

4+00 S

5+00 S

6+OOS

7 + OOS

8+OC S

49 0 20

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYINSTRUMENT OMNI IV MAG ACCURACY OIK REFERENCE FIELD 6)000 DATUM : 58OOO l CONTOUR INTERVAL : MAGNETIC LOW -

BASE STATION RECORDER INFORMATION

INSTRUMENT OMNI IV RECORDING INTERVAL 10 SEC

VLF SURVEYINSTRUMENT. GEONICS EM - 16 TRANSMITTING STATION : CUTLER, MAINE OPERATOR FACING NORTH DIP ANGLE : f N + , S - ) - ^^ - - QUADRATURE *-~- x ---*---* PROFILE SCALE- IcmjIOVo ^^^

POSITIVE READINGS EAST OF LINE

TOPOGRAPHY

CLAIM POST

STREAM

SWAMP

3,

ARMENO RESOURCES INC.

NEWKIRK - DUNVEGANGEORGIA LAKE AREA

DISTRICT OF THUNDER BAY

VLF PROFILE MAPDate: SEPT. t i987[ Scale: li 2500 j NT. S. i 42-E-5

PHANTOM EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.— -. ..--...III 111(11

42E05S*ee03 2.16458 BARBARA LAKE

210

B L. 0 + 00

i+o

2-t-OO S

3 -t-CC S

4-*-00 S

e +OD s

O C\J

-J

O

-I

LU

OCVJ

LU

O^roo

LJ

O CD fO

LU

O 00

LU

O O CO

LU

OC\J

LU

O ^t 00

LU

O CD O*-l

LJO 00 O

-l

LU

O O Os)

LU

O eg

8-*-

/ B.L. 0-1-00

00 S

2 + QOS

4-OOS

5-1-00 S

6+OOS

7 + OOS

8 4-0 C S

42E05SWe0fl3 2.16456 BARBARA LAKE 220 "

49 0 2O

CLAUS

Scale i: 31680

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYINSTRUMENT: OMNI iv MAG.ACCURACY : 0-1 X REFERENCE FIELD: 61000 DATUM : 58000 * CONTOUR INTERVAL : 50 f MAGNETIC LOW :

BASE STATION RECORDER INFORMATIONINSTRUMENT : OMNI IV RECORDING INTERVAL : 10 SEC.

VLF SURVEYINSTRUMENT; GEONICS EM-IB TRANSMITTING STATION : CUTLER, MAINE OPERATOR FACING - NORTH DIP ANGLE : ( N 4- , S ~ ) - —— - 'QUADRATURE : V---X---X---K

PROFILE SCALE : ____ ————

POSITIVE READINGS : EAST OF LINE

TOPOGRAPHY

CLAIM POST

STREAM

SWAMP

ARMENO RESOURCES INC.

NEWKIRK - DUNVEGANGEORGIA LAKE AREA

DISTRICT OF THUNDER BAY

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYDate: SEPT.,1987 Scale: C 2500 NT. S. : 42-E-5

PHANTOM EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.