Expert Witness Depositions in Nursing Home Injury Cases...
Transcript of Expert Witness Depositions in Nursing Home Injury Cases...
Expert Witness Depositions in Nursing Home
Injury Cases: Taking and Defending
Depositions
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1.
WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2019
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Mark A. Cox, Founder, Mark A. Cox, Edmond, Okla.
Monica C. Fillmore, Attorney, Burns White, Cherry Hill, N.J.
Joel E. Smith, Partner, Kosieradzki Smith Law Firm, Plymouth, Minn.
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 2.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
5/7/2019 Mark A. Cox
Preparing Your Expert for Deposition
Make sure expert has all necessary evidence
1 week before deposition
Day before deposition
Outline of Opinions
Make sure expert has all necessary evidence
5/7/2019 Mark A. Cox 6
All necessary evidence does not mean ALL evidence available.
Prepare your expert how to handle questions about not reviewing everything
1 week before deposition
5/7/2019 Mark A. Cox 7
Not too soon, not too late
In person
Expert needs to be totally prepared to visit
Gives enough time for corrections or follow upThis Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC
Day before deposition
5/7/2019 Mark A. Cox 8
Meet in person
Review file
Ensure expert is perfect
Go over outline
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC
Outlines
5/7/2019 Mark A. Cox 9
To outline or not to outline, that is the question.
If no report, I outline
5/7/2019Mark A. Cox
Prepare for examination
Expert will not work on the fly
Talk about objections
Talk about breaks
Assure protection
Stay in your lane
Defend then take deposition
Deposing the opponent’s expert: Strategies for maximizing the
testimonyMonica Chheda Fillmore, Esq
Burns White LLC
Background of the Expert
12
Examine the credentials of the expert:
• Academic background
• Work history
• Board certifications
• Organization memberships
• Publications and Presentations
• Past Expert work
Background of the Expert
13
• Comprehensive list of what they reviewed before, during and after writing the report.
• What materials they did or did not ask for.
• Notes taken during review and information from retaining counsel.
• Independent examinations and research.
Materials Reviewed
14
• Limiting opinions to the four corners of the report.
• Rooting out the extraneous details to get a simplified summary of their opinions.
• Determining the factual basis for the opinions.
• Knowing the case law you intend to rely upon for any dispositive motions or motions in limine.
• Use of hypotheticals.
Nailing Down the Opinion
15
Strategies for challenging opinions
16
• Being able to respond to new information at deposition.
• Deciding what to elicit at deposition and what to save for trial.
• Knowing the testimony and records to challenge the basis of current and new opinions.
Strategies for challenging opinions
17
Cherry Hill, NJ | Cleveland, OH | Harrisburg, PA | Philadelphia, PA | Pittsburgh, PA
Princeton, NJ | Wheeling, WV | Wilkes-Barre, PA | Wilmington, DE
burnswhite.com
18
Joel E. Smith
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
Expert Witness Depositions in Nursing Home Injury Cases: Taking
and Defending Depositions
Strafford May 8, 2019
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONS
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
Model Rule 3.4: “fairness to opposing party and counsel”
Model Rule 3.4(a): “A lawyer shall not … unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence”
Redwood v. Dobson, 476 F.3d 462, 469 (7th Cir. 2007): Obstructive deposition tactics = ethical violations and sanctionable violations of rules of civil procedure
20
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONS Model Rule 8: “maintain the integrity” of the profession
Model Rule 8.4(d): misconduct to “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice”
Horton v. Maersk Line, Ltd., 249 F.R.D. 690, 698 (S.D. Ga. 2013)
Ross v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., 197 F.R.D. 646, 664 (W.D. Mo. 2000)
Zottola v. Anesth. Consult. Of Savannah, P.C., 2012 WL 6824150 at *6 (S.D. Ga. June 7, 2012
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
21
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONS Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(d)(3): Preserves all objections for trial unless the basis of the objection might have been corrected if raised at the deposition.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(d)(3)(B)(i): “Error or Irregularity” re …
• “the manner or taking the deposition”
• “the form of a question or answer”
• “a party’s conduct”
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
22
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONS Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(c)(2): “An objection must be stated concisely and in a nonargumentative and nonsuggestive manner.”
Two Schools of Jurisprudence
1. “Object to Form” only
Damaj v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc., 164 F.R.D. 559, 561 (N.D. Okla. 1995)
2. “Objections to Form or Foundation”
Sec. Nat. Bank of Sioux City, Iowa v. Abbott Labs., 299 F.R.D. 595, 601-03 (N.D. Iowa 2014)
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
23
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONSPROHIBITED
• Witness Coaching
• Passing Notes
Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525, 528 (E.D. Pa. 1993)
Vnuk v. Berwick Hosp. Co., 2016 WL 907714 at *4 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2106)
• Text Messages
Ngai v. Old Navy, 2009 WL 2391282 at *1 (D.N.J. July 31, 2009)
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
24
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONSPROHIBITED
• Speaking Objections
• “If you know”
McDonough v. Keniston, 188 F.R.D. 22, 24 (D. N.H. 1998)
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Serrano, 2012 WL 28071 at *5 (D. Kan. Jan. 5, 2012)
• Vagueness or “Lack of Understanding”
Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525, 530, no. 10 (E.D. Pa. 1993)
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
25
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONSPROHIBITED
• Excessive Objections
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(2)
Am. Directory Serv. Agency, Inc. v. Beam, 131 F.R.D. 15, 18-19 (D. D.C. 1990)
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
In re Stratosphere Corp. Sec. Litig., 182 F.R.D. 614 619 (D. Nev. 1998)
26
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
RAISING AND DEFENDING
OBJECTIONS
1. Professional Conduct
2. Proper Objections
3. Improper Objections
27
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
28
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
29
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
30
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
31
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
Is the expert necessary?
Is the expert qualified?
Georgia Code § 24-7-702(c)
Tennessee Code § 29-26-115(b)
Tousignant v. St. Louis County, 615 N.W.2d 53, 59-60 (Minn. 2000)
32
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(e)(1)
EBC, Inc. v. Clark Bldg. Sys., Inc., 618 F.3d 253, 266 (3d Cir. 2010)
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus., Inc., 277 F.R.D. 286, 296 (E.D. Va. 2011)
33
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
Substantive Changes3 Views on What’s Permissible
Greenway v. Int’l Paper Co., 144 F.R.D. 322, 325 (W.D. La. 1992)
Wyeth v. Lupin Ltd., 252 F.R.D. 295, 296 (D. Md. 2008)
Podell v. Citicorp Diners Club, Inc., 112 F.3d 98, 103 (2d Cir. 1997)
3
2
1
34
© Kosieradzki . Smith Law Firm, LLC 2019
POST-DEPOSITION
STRATEGIES
1. Additional Discovery
2. Motions in Limine
3. Errata Sheets
Substantive ChangesWhat Can You Do Now?
Podell v. Citicorp Diners Club, Inc., 112 F.3d 98, 103 (2d Cir. 1997)
Tingley Sys., Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc., 152 F.Supp.2d 95, 121 (D. Mass. 2001)
35