Expert Group Meeting on National Accounts in the Caribbean 26-28 September 2011 Port of Spain
description
Transcript of Expert Group Meeting on National Accounts in the Caribbean 26-28 September 2011 Port of Spain
General overview of the ICP 2011: National Accounts Activities, Reporting
Requirements and Timetable
Expert Group Meeting on National Accounts in the Caribbean26-28 September 2011
Port of Spain
Outline
1. Overview
2. National Accounts Activities
3. Reporting Requirements
4. Timetable
2
3
Overview
4
What is the ICP?
Using PPPs instead of market exchange rates makes it possible to compare the output of economies and the welfare of their inhabitants in real terms.
ICP is a worldwide statistical initiative to collect comparative price data and estimate purchasing power parities (PPPs) of the world’s economies.
PPP Vs. Exchange
Rate
Main Objectives
Provide international price and volume comparisons of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and its component expenditures
Measure the differences in price and volume levels of GDP and GDP per capita of various expenditure aggregates and sub-aggregates
between countries within a region
between countries in different regions
Overview
By Households
By NPISHsIndividual
Consumption Expenditure
110
Price
By Government
By GovernmentCollective Consumption
Gross Fixed Capital
Formation
Machinery & Equipment
Construction & Civil Eng.
Others
Other Components
Changes in inventories
Net Exports
Value
From ICP Objective to N.A. in ICPQuantity
Volume Ratio Value ratio PPP
GDP Expenditure Values for 155 Basic Headings, for the reference year 2011
Prices for over 2000 representative products collected over one year in 2011
5
Pressures caused by the need to develop new procedures to collect and validate data led to insufficient attention to the national accounts until late in the process
6
Identified issue
Goals for 2011 ICP
Improving the quality of real expenditures by collecting national accounts data earlier in the process
Identifying the basic headings that are most likely to have a significant impact on the consistency between economies
Lessons from the 2005 ICP
7
1993 SNAThe ICP requires national accounts estimates based on the 1993 SNA
Exhaustiveness of GDP
Various terms are used to describe parts of GDP that fall outside the scope of admin records and statistical surveys on which the national accounts are based
― underground economy, black economy, non-observed economy, informal economy
All economic activities have to be included, whether legal and illegal
Comparability Problems
8
Observed
Non-Observed
Legal
Illegal
FormalInformal
Terms do not always refer to the same thing across economies
Informal economy and the non-observed economy may largely overlap
It is likely that GDP in most economies includes some of the informal economy
Subsistence production/consumption is a potential area of understatement
The scope of economic surveys may exclude some businesses
Comparability Problems [Cont’d]
9
Major Aggregate Data
• Validated major aggregate data
• Metadata
Basic Heading Data• Validated basic heading data
• Metadata
• Population and exchange rate data
Latest Data Available between 2006-2010
Final Data and Metadata
2011 Data
Preliminary Data and Metadata
Final Data and Metadata
Data & Metadata
10
National Accounts Activities
11
National accounts statistics
Basic Heading level data
Prices
Accuracy
Reliability of PPP-deflated GDP
Comparability
ExpendituresConsistency
Role of NA in the ICP
National Accounts Activities Carry out N.A. work
for comp. resistant areas
Use N.A. data to help edit survey prices
Price Surveys
Develop vector of 2011 GDP expenditures
Use Survey Prices in GDP
Implement Price Tracking
12
Prices Final Output
Categories of activities
Implement Commodity Flow
Select Major Products
Identify Data Sources for Major
Products
Prepare Matrix of Data Availability for
Major Products
Compile GDP & Main uses for 2011
Major Products
Review GDP Classification
Early data need to identify & resolve data
problems
Create Metadata Flow Chart for 2005
GDP expenditure
Update Metadata Flow Chart for latest
year possible
Early Metadata Flow Chart for 2011
Structure
Work Flow
1 2 13
3 6
4 78
59
1410
11 12 15
13
Initial Values for L.Y.*
Data Sources
Adjustments to L.Y.*
BH Values for L.Y.*
Price Review for L.Y.*
Commodity Flow
Final Values for 2011
Adjustments to 2011
BH Values for 2011
Price Review for 2011
Variations over time
* L.Y. : Latest year available
Activity Flow Chart
14
Reporting Requirements
How We Came Up with the MORES
5 Forms were initially developed
Extensive review
INAG recommendation
MORES
Extensive consultation
2
3
4
5
1
16
Reporting Requirements
National Accounts Quality Assurance Questionnaire
Eurostat “Tabular Approach to Exhaustiveness”
MORES
I
II
III
17
Quality Assurance Framework Questionnaires
SNA 93 Compliance
5 groups - 30 questions
Price –National Accounts Consistency
Valuation Rules
ICP Requirements
Recording Rules
Q01; Q02; Q03; Q05
Q04; Q18
Q06; Q08;Q09; Q10; Q11; Q12; Q13; Q14; Q15; Q16; Q17; Q19; Q23; Q24; Q25
Q07; Q26
Q20; Q21; Q22; Q27; Q28; Q29; Q30
1.
4.
3.
2.
5.
18
Eurostat tabular approach to exhaustiveness
Systematic method to identify potential sources of understatement in the NA due to omissions from the statistical source data that classify adjustments into seven types of “non-exhaustiveness”
GDP Exhaustiveness Questionnaire
19
Seven types of “non-exhaustiveness“
Other statistical deficiencies
Misreporting by producers
Registered entrepreneurs not surveyed
Legal producers not surveyed
Producer not required to register
Producer deliberately does not register (illegal
activities)
Producer deliberately does not register (underground
activities)
Typically includes small producers with income above the threshold set for registration
…because he is involved in illegal activities
…because they do not have any market output or it is below a set threshold
…because the register updating procedures may be slow or inadequate.
…either deliberately or because the register updating sources do not include details of such person
…involves under-reporting gross output and/or over-reporting intermediate consumption
Data that are incomplete or cannot be directly collected from surveys, or data that are incorrectly compiled during survey processing.N7
N6
N5
N4
N3
N2
N1
20
Exhaustiveness checks & adjust-ments Initial
national accounts estimates
N1
Adjustments Finalnational
accounts estimates
N2 N3 N4 N6N5 N7Total
Production approach
Expenditure approach
Income approach
Output of goods and services (basic prices)
Intermediate consumption (purchasers’ prices)
...
...
…
21
Detailed expenditure values for each basic heading of the ICP classification.
The Model Report on Expenditure Statistics (MORES)
Information on the indicators that were used/or are going to be used to estimate the expenditure values
Information on the splitting approach
The MORES aims to assist countries to compile
22
Timetable
23
Late
st Y
ear
2011 2012 2013Q4Q3 Q4Q3 Q4Q3Q2Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q1
P
Major Aggregate Data & Metadata
Basic Heading Data & Metadata
Major Aggregate Data & Metadata
Basic Heading Data & Metadata
NCs to RCs
RCs to GO
P
P
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
P-Preliminary resultF-Final result
Schedule of SubmissionsYe
ar 2
011
24
THANK YOU