Experiment Readiness Review of Physics Division Hall C ... · Experiment Readiness Review of...
Transcript of Experiment Readiness Review of Physics Division Hall C ... · Experiment Readiness Review of...
1 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Experiment Readiness Review of Physics Division
Hall C SHMS Q2, Q3, and Dipole: Review of Common Components
Steven Lassiter
October 12, 2016
2 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Common Component List
• Cryo Control Reservoir (CCR)
(Myer Tooling)
• Current Leads (AMI)
• DC Power Supply (Danfysik)
• Quench Detector (Danfysik)
• DC water cooled bus
• Cryo Lines, Valves and Actuators
• Instrumentation
• Relief Valves & Rupture Disks
• PLC Control
• Additional Equipment
3 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Comments on Common Systems
• SHMS SC magnet designs utilized standardized & tested systems & components.
• Use of Standardized Tested Systems results in safer magnets.
• Standardized magnet system components lead to sensible higher quality magnet solutions that are easier to operate and maintain.
• Standardized components (procured in bulk by JLAB) saved money & time.
4 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Cryogenic Control Reservoir
• Manufactured by Myer Tooling in 2010 in accordance with the intent of the ASME 2007 section VIII Division 2.
• Six were made - one went Hall D
• Contains a 91L He and 54L LN2 reservoirs.
• Piping and valves to direct cryogen flow.
• Chimney area where the Vapor Cooled Current leads are spliced to coils superconducting leads.
• Platform for valve actuators, relief devices, cryogen bayonets, vacuum/pressure gauges, instrumentation ports and current lead interface.
• Original used on the HMS magnets.
5 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Cryogenic Control Reservoir
6 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
AMI Vapor Cooled Current Leads
• AMI/JLAB 5000 AMP
burnout proof re-
optimized vapor cooled
current lead (1.63
L/Hr/KA)
• 5 KA lead pair designed,
built and tested by AMI
• 5000 A DC No Cooling
for 11.3 minutes Safe
• 3700 A DC No Cooling
Safe forever
• 33 minute (2.5
A/sec)slow dump no
cooling Safe
7 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
VCL 5KA no coolant 11mins @ 4900A Test
Figure 7
Tempertaure Profile - 5000 Amp Current Lead
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Sensor Location on Lead (inches, cold end to warm end)
Tem
pera
ture
(K
)
Full Flow, 4900 Amps
No FLow, 4900 Amps, 100 Seconds
No Flow, 4900 Amps, 200 Seconds
No Flow, 4900 Amps, 300 Seconds
No Flow, 4900 Amps, 400 Seconds
No FLow, 4900 Amps, 500 Seconds
No Flow, 4900 Amps, 600 Seconds
No Flow, 4900 Amps, 680 seconds
8 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
DC Power Supply
• Danfysik System 8000 - JLAB Features
• Standard DC PSU for HMS, Hall D, CLAS Torus & HRS Q1’s, Hall B Torus and Solenoid
• Integral NMR stabilization, polarity switch, energy dump & Quench Detection
• JLAB standard control panel remotely located within SHMS Electronics Room.
• Compatible with standard Hall C magnet controls and ASCII communication.
9 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
DC Power Supply
• Stability at 1E-6 level in
regulation mode.
• Stability is ~ 10 nano
Tesla with NMR, Used on
Dipole Magnet.
• Absolute Precision better
than 1E-4 .
• Transistor final stage
regulation.
• PARD better than 1E-5.
• Fast Energy Dump Switch
10 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Danfysik system 8500 PSU
Dump Switch circuit
11 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
DCPS Testing
• Factory test of PSU into a resistive load was witnessed by JLAB staff.
• PSU’s acceptance test within Hall C using the HMS magnets as the
inductive load - June 2014.
• Issue with the regulation boards allowing an in rush of current when the
PSU main (to the magnet) is turned on.
• Repaired regulation boards have been installed and re-tested.
• Improvements to the Dump bypass switch opening times have been made
and tested. Dump bypass switch opening times went from ~1 sec to ~30ms.
• V-loop boards have been adjusted to reduce ringing. Final balancing will
occur once connected to magnets inductive load.
12 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
DCPS Interface
13 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
DC PS Interlocks
Slow Discharge
• HMI-PLC Buttons
• Hardware/PSU Slow
Discharge Buttons
• Current Lead Mass Flow
• Status of Dump Switch
• Helium Liquid Level < Min
• Magnet Temps > 10K
• Vacuum > 0.01 Torr
• 1.0< LN2 Pressure > 2.5
atm
• Min< Support Links> Max
• Fast Interlock Signal
Fast Discharge
• Quench Detector Hardware
• QD Software
• HMI/PLC Panic Button
• Panic Button Hardware
• MPS-CPU reset command
• PLC keep alive timer > 10 sec
• 1.0 < He Pressure > 1.8 atm
• Broken cable/wire detection
Voltage Taps
14 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Hardware Quench Detector
• Range and sensitivity easily customizable
• Detection range ~ 5 milliVolts to 1 volt. Nominally set to 10mV for magnets.
• Integrated into Danfysik System 8000 DC power supply.
• Detection mode: Bucked signals for coils, absolute voltage for current leads.
• Broken cable detection.
• Extra relay and interlocks status outputs for PLC.
• Setup and calibration will occur during low power magnet commissioning.
• Response time measured at ~15ms with no front panel delay time.
• Backed with a PLC software Quench Detector.
15 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Quench Detector Schematic
16 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
DC Water Cooled Bus
• Water Cooled DC bus lines.
• 2,000 MCM
• 5 gal/min coolant
• Resistance 0.24 milli-
Ohm/lead
• Water flow switch in series
with PSU’s water flow
interlock
17 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Cryo, Vacuum, Pressure, Strain Gauges
• JLAB/FNAL valves, actuators, bayonets
• Macro Sensors LVDT valve position readback units.
• Cryomagnetics Liquid level meter for both LHe and LN2.
• PT100 sensors for temperatures above 50K
• Carbon Ceramic sensors (Temati) for temperature <50K and located in high magnetic and radiation fields.
• Diodes for temperatures sensors in low magnetic fields.
• Single multi-range vacuum gauge.
• He and LN2 pressure gauges.
• Strain gauges for support links.
• Cryofab He mass flow controllers for Vapor Cooled Current Leads.
• Hall probes and NMR unit for Dipole.
18 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Relief Valves
Relief Valves • Set pressure: 4 atm (gauge)
• Helium relief valve Anderson Greenwood pilot operated relief valve, Model No. 25905K34/S with a discharge area of 1186 mm^2
• Nitrogen relief valve Flowsafe F84-8 ¾ X 1F SS 0.261 in^2
Relief Valve
Magnet Failure Mode Required Capacity (kg/hr)
Design Capacity (kg/hr)
Helium Q2/3 Quench with active protection
𝟓. 𝟏𝟕𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟏𝟔. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
Dipole Quench with active protection
𝟖. 𝟔𝟒𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟏𝟔. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
Nitrogen Q2/3 Loss of vacuum 𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝟗𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟏. 𝟏𝟓𝟕 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
Dipole Loss of vacuum 𝟏. 𝟎𝟏𝟎 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟏. 𝟏𝟓𝟕 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
19 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Rupture Discs
Rupture Discs • Set pressure: 5 atm (gauge)
• Rupture disc for helium Fike 3’’ AXIUS for Q2/3 and Fike 4’’ AXIUS for Dipole
• Rupture discs for nitrogen Fike 1’’ AXIUS BT
Rupture disc
Magnet Worst Scenario Required Capacity (kg/hr)
Design Capacity (kg/hr)
Helium Q2/3 Loss of vacuum triggers quench with failed dump resistor
𝟑𝟎. 𝟐𝟎 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟑𝟔. 𝟎𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
Dipole Loss of vacuum triggers quench with failed dump resistor
𝟒𝟕. 𝟔𝟑 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟔𝟎. 𝟓𝟎 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
Nitrogen Q2/3 Loss of vacuum 𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝟗𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟐. 𝟔𝟏𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
Dipole Loss of vacuum 1.010 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟐. 𝟔𝟏𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
20 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
OVC Parallel Relief Plates
Parallel Relief Plates (pop-up relief valves) for Vacuum Insulating Space of Magnet • Relief pressure: 0.5 atm (gauge)
• Two 4’’ parallel plates
Worst Scenario Required Capacity (kg/hr)
Design Capacity (kg/hr)
A broken helium line 𝟖. 𝟎𝟕𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟏𝟕. 𝟕𝟑 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
A broken nitrogen line 𝟏. 𝟕𝟐𝟗 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝟐𝟓. 𝟑𝟎 × 𝟏𝟎𝟑
21 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
PLC Control Layout
• Copy of the HMS controls -
Programmed in-house.
• Allen Bradley Dual Redundant PLC & hardware.
• Rockwell Automation software.
• Radiation hard signal conditioning within Hall.
• PLC and I/O modules in a clean, accessible environment.
• Hot swap of components.
• Shares data with EPICS and OPC devices. (Open Connectivity
22 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
PLC Rack Hardware
• Each subsystem has ~100 signals.
• Cables to port signals from each magnet’s CCR to Detector Hut Electronics room installed.
• Signal Conditioners for:
1. Temperature sensors: PT, carbon glass
2. Strain gauges.
3. LVDT, valves position read back.
4. Cryogenic Pressure sensors, flow meters and liquid level meters.
5. Voltages and currents.
• Housed within five I/O racks located in Detector Hut Electronics room.
• Communications: ASCII, Ethernet and Control Net.
• Field control devices (NMR, Hall Probes).
• Power supplies (low voltage 24V and 5V).
23 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Magnet Interlock Page
24 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Additional Equipment
• Tektronix DPO3000 series 4 channel data storage scope
• Timing of 10K sample/sec
• Coincident timing among 4 channels
Capture of Scope’s screen for SHMS HB’s 1700A Fast Dump
• Extra Current Transducer LEM2 if needed
25 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Conclusion
• SHMS Magnets share many common components, resulting in savings in
cost, setup, commissioning and repairs.
• All systems are in place, tested and prepped for installation.
• Lessons learned and performance enhancements from HMS, SHMS Q1 &
HB magnet commissioning and other halls have been incorporated to all
systems.
• Ready for magnet arrivals.
26 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Appendix
27 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
SHMS Valve Control Screen
28 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Force Link Screen
29 Experiment Readiness
Review of Physics Division October 12, 2016
Voltage Screen