Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

20
Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary Anna Parizán Counsellor - Rural Development Officer Ministry of Rural Development 13. December 2011

description

Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary. Anna Parizán Counsellor - Rural Development Officer Ministry of Rural Development. 13. December 2011. L iasion E ntre A ctions pour le D eveloppement de l' E conomie R urale 1991-1993 LEADER I. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

Page 1: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

Anna ParizánCounsellor - Rural Development Officer

Ministry of Rural Development

13. December 2011

Page 2: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

2

Liasion Entre Actions pour le Developpement de l'Economie Rurale

1991-1993 LEADER I. 1994-1999 LEADER II. 2000-2006 LEADER+ 2007-2013 LEADER - Axis IV.

Page 3: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

3

ARDOP LEADER ProgrammeARDOP LEADER Programme

Page 4: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

4

ARDOP LEADER+ Programme(1)

• ARDOP LEADER+ Programme launched in June 2005 as a part of the SAPARD and ARDOP Programmes

• Challenging task to fit the LEADER into the ARDOP system• ARDOP is complicated and difficult system• dates and schedules were not kept

Finance:Total budget: 6.7 billion forintGrants: 90 or 100 million forint per LAG

Max. 15% for operational cost

85% for local applications

Projects realized and payments finished.

Page 5: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

5

ARDOP LEADER+ Programme(2)

Territorial data:

• application of 186 LAGs (2332 settlements, 75% of the settlements in Hungary)

• number of inhabitants on these settlements: 3 434 818 persons (34% of the Hungarian population)

• average population size per LAG: 18 467 persons• on average 12.5 settlements belong to one LAG

70 LAGs were selected (31% of the settlements in Hungary)• Number of inhabitants on these settlements: 1 601 733 persons (16% of

the Hungarian population)• average population size per LAG: 22 882 persons• on average 13.7 settlements belong to one LAG

Page 6: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

6

70 selected LAGs

Page 7: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

7

New Hungary Rural Development ProgrammeNew Hungary Rural Development Programme

Page 8: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

8

Allocation of EAFRD resources

Axis I. 48% Axis IV.

Axis II. 35%

Axis III. 17%

TA 4%

The resources of Axis IV. (5.5%) will be deducted from the amount allocated for Axis IV, following the ratios 25-10-65 percent, accordingly

Page 9: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

9

• EAFRD contribution: over 3,8 billion

euros

• National contribution: over 1,3 billion euros

• Expected private expenditure: over 3,2 billion euros

• Total cost: over 8,3 billion

euros• Axis I. – 2,3 billion EUR• Axis II. – 1,6 billion EUR• Axis III. – 690 million EUR• Axis IV. – 272 million EUR• TA – 202,978,313 EUR

Allocation of EAFRD resource (2)

Page 10: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

10

Actors in LEADER Programme

Paying Agency(MVH)

Managing Authority – Ministry of Rural

Development(IH - VM)

MRD RDEAI(VM VKSZI)

Hungarian National Rural

Network(MNVH)

Rural Development Agency(HVI)

Local Action Group

Beneficiaries

Page 11: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

11

LEADER Programme in Hungary

• 105 registered communities (10 October 2007);

• 96 LAGs became „LEADER LAGs” officially (26th September 2008);

• All eligible Hungarian rural communities are covered;

• LAGs become legal entities (decentralized decision making system);

Page 12: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

12

LEADER Programme in Hungary

Page 13: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

13

Measures of Axis III.

Axis III: Quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy:

• Diversification into non-agricultural activities;

• Support for business creation and development;

• Encouragement of tourism activities;

• Basic services for the economy and rural population;

• Village renewal and development;

• Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage;

• preparation of Natura 2000;

• maintenance/development plans;

• Training and information;

• Skill acquisition, animation and implementation.

Page 14: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

14

Measures of Axis IV.

Axis IV: LEADER

1. Implementation of the local development strategies

2. International and transnational cooperation

3. Running costs, acquisition of skills and animation

I. Tendering period: 1 October 2009- 16 November 2009

Number of projects supported: 3082

Commitment: 44 659 365 euro

II. Tendering period: 29 November 2011- 5 December 2011

Page 15: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

15

I. Selection of LEADER action groups and Local CommunitiesSetting up the structures (May 2007 – 10 October 2007)Local communities: Selection (10 October 2007 – January 2008)

II. Local PlanningLocal planning (11 January 2008 to September 2008)Selection (July – September 2008)

III. Implementation

Timetable for the LEADER LAGs

Page 16: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

16

Objectives of the measure:• Promotion and implementation of inter-territorial and international

cooperation;• Facilitating the share of experiences;• Know-how;• Best practices;• Preparation of joint actions and common projects;

3 levels of cooperation:• Cooperation projects within the country;• Cooperation projects at EU level;• Cooperation projects with third countries.

Inter-territorial and transnational cooperation within LEADER

Page 17: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

17

Cooperation process:

• LAG should integrate possible fields of cooperation and cooperation actions into the LEADER Strategy;

• Strategy can be modified during the programming period;

• LAG is required to indicate its related demand to the MA;

• Projects should be approved by MA;

• Deadline for the submission of cooperative projects: 31.12.2013;

• Interregional and international projects can be both supported after approval of the MA and PA.

Page 18: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

18

• Number of local communities and people involved in the project;

• Expected outcome of the cooperation;

• Sustainability of the cooperation.

Selection criteria for cooperation projects

Page 19: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

19

• Sharing of experience, know-how, jointly prepared and executed activities,

joint actions wherein the target groups of all the regions;

• Jointly operated organizations;

• Preparatory activities for cooperative projects;

• Building up common structures;

• Animation and coordination among the partners can be supported.

Supported activities

Page 20: Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary

20

Thank you for your kind attention!

Anna Parizán

Ministry of Rural DevelopmentDepartment of Rural Development

Rural Development Unit1055 Budapest, Kossuth tér 11.

e-mail: [email protected]