Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting AGENDA

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting AGENDA (Full packet with attachments available at www.ccta.net) This meeting is scheduled to be audiocast live on the Contra Costa Transportation Authority website. Visit the Public Meeting page under “Get Involved” to tune in.

DATE: August 10, 2015

TIME: 11:30am lunch served; 12:00pm convene meeting

PLACE: Embassy Suites Walnut Creek, Contra Costa Ballroom 1345 Treat Blvd. Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (Adjacent to Contra Costa Transportation Authority Offices and conveniently accessible by BART at the Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre station.)

COMMISSIONERS Julie Pierce, Chair Dave Hudson, Vice Chair Janet Abelson Newell Arnerich Tom Butt David Durant Federal Glover Karen Mitchoff Kevin Romick Don Tatzin Robert Taylor

ALTERNATES Candace Andersen Sal Evola John Gioia Loella Haskew Dave Hudson Ron Leone Sherry McCoy Mike Metcalf Mary Piepho Karen Stepper

EX-OFFICIOS Amy Worth, MTC Gail Murray, BART H. E. Christian Peeples, Public Transit Bus Operators

Executive Director Randell H. Iwasaki

COMMISSIONERS Robert Taylor, Chair David Durant, Vice Chair Janet Abelson Newell Arnerich Ed Balico Susan Bonilla Jim Frazier Federal Glover Mike Metcalf Julie Pierce Maria Viramontes

ALTERNATES Guy Bjerke Genoveva Calloway Dave Hudson Brian Kalinowski Mary Piepho Kevin Romick Cindy Silva Don Tatzin

Gayle Uilkema

EX-OFFICIOS Amy Worth, MTC Joel Keller, BART Bob Simmons, Public Transit Bus Operators

Executive Director Randell H. Iwasaki

A. CONVENE MEETING: David Early, Facilitator

B. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to address the Committee regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please complete one of the speaker cards in advance of the meeting and hand it to a member of the staff.

C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) Minutes of July 10, 2015. (Attachment – Action)

D. GENERAL BUSINESS:

D.1 EPAC Meeting Calendar (Attachment – Information)

D.2 EPAC Roster (Attachment – Information)

D.3 Action Item Log (Attachment – Information)

http://www.ccta.net/

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting AGENDA August 10, 2015

of 3

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

1.0 Presentations. EPAC members will receive a series of presentations on topics relevant to the Transportation Expenditure Plan. Presentations will be limited in duration to allow ample time for EPAC Q&A and discussion. An asterisk on an item below indicates that it was requested by an EPAC member.

1.1 Measures C and J and Contra Costa Transportation Vision.* Randell Iwasaki, CCTA Executive Director, will present the EPAC with the status of Measures C and J, as well as the status of the Contra Costa Transportation Vision. (Five minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.2 Regional Transportation Planning Committee Priorities. Hisham Noemi, CCTA will present the EPAC with information about the four Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC)’s priorities for projects and programs. Representatives of Transportation Partnership and Cooperation (TRANSPAC) in Central County, West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC), Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT), and TRANSPLAN in East County will be available to answer questions. (Ten minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.3 Transportation Priorities of Jurisdictions. Joe Sbranti, City Manager of Pittsburg and representative of the Public Managers’ Association, will present the EPAC with information about priorities at the jurisdictional level for projects and programs. (Five minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.4 Bus Transit Operators Priorities. Representatives of Tri Delta Transit, AC Transit, County Connection, and WestCAT will present the EPAC with information about priorities for projects and programs. (Ten minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.5 BART Priorities and Potential Ballot Measure. Representatives of Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) will present the EPAC with information about BART priorities for projects and programs, and a potential BART ballot measure. (Five minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.6 California Transportation Plan 2040.* Katie Benouar, Caltrans Division Chief of Transportation Planning, will present the EPAC with information about the California Transportation Plan 2040, including statewide and regional transportation priorities. (Five minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.7 TEP Communications Plan and Polling.* Linsey Willis, CCTA External Relations Director, and Alex Evans, EMC Research, will present the EPAC with information about the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) Communications Plan, including

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting AGENDA August 10, 2015

of 3

information about planned public polling. (Five minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

1.8 Lessons Learned from Alameda County.* Art Dao, Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Executive Director, will present the EPAC with lessons that were learned from the failures and successes of Alameda’s Measures B1 (2012) and BB (2014). (Five minute presentation followed by EPAC Q&A and discussion) (No Attachment)

2.0 Discussion of TEP Priorities and Topics of Future Meetings. David Early will facilitate a discussion of EPAC members’ priorities in order to plan for meetings in September and October, inviting EPAC members to comment on priorities, meeting schedule, agenda, and information needs. (No Attachment)

3.0 ADJOURNMENT: Adjournment to next meeting Monday, September 14, 2015 at 1:30pm.

ANY WRITINGS OR DOCUMENTS pertaining to an open session item provided to a majority of the Committee less than 72 hours prior to the meeting shall be made available for public inspection at 2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, California, during normal business hours.

PUBLIC COMMENT: The public may comment on any matter on the agenda, or related matters not on the agenda, by completing a speaker card (available in meeting room), which should be provided to a CCTA staff member. Public comment may be limited to three minutes (or other such time period as determined by the Chair), in accordance with CCTA’s Administrative Code, Section 103.4(b).

TRANSLATION SERVICES: If you require a translator to facilitate testimony to the Authority, please contact Danice at (925) 256-4722 no later than 48 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting. Si usted requiere a un traductor para facilitar testimonio a la Authority, por favor llame Danice al (925) 256-4722, 48 horas antes de la asamblea.

ADA COMPLIANCE This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Govt. Code Sec. 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability-related modification or accommodation should contact Danice Rosenbohm (925-256-4722) during regular business hours, at least 24 hours prior to the time of the meeting.

TThhiiss PPaaggee IInntteennttiioonnaallllyy BBllaannkk

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting MINUTES MEETING DATE: July 1, 2015

MEMBERS PRESENT: See attached Meeting Attendance Log, Page 8

MINUTES PREPARED BY: Joanna Winter

A. CONVENE MEETING: Facilitator David Early convened the meeting at 10:02 am.

B. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.

C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of June 3, 2015.

ACTION: Member Xavier moved to approve the EPAC Meeting Minutes of June 3, 2015, seconded by Member Connelly. The motion passed with one abstention. Member Piras abstained.

DISCUSSION: Member Piras suggested that June 3 EPAC member introductions be captured as a substantive list rather than a summary. Facilitator David Early noted that staff would be providing meeting summaries, and recordings of the EPAC meetings are available on the CCTA website.

D. GENERAL BUSINESS:

D.1 EPAC Meeting Calendar.

ACTION: None taken – information only.

DISCUSSION: Facilitator David Early presented EPAC members with the EPAC meeting calendar through December 2015.

D.2 EPAC Roster.


DISCUSSION: David Early presented EPAC members with the updated EPAC member roster, which includes new members who did not attend the June 3, 2015 EPAC meeting.

D.3 Action Item Log.

Attachment – Item C

C-1

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting MINUTES July 1, 2015 Page 2 of 9


DISCUSSION: David Early presented EPAC members with a log showing the updated status of action items assigned to staff at the June 3, 2015 EPAC meeting.

D.4 EPAC Meeting Materials.


DISCUSSION: David Early presented EPAC members with a guide to accessing EPAC meeting materials on the Internet. Members with questions were referred to Linsey Willis of the CCTA, and to Andrew Hill or Joanna Winter of PlaceWorks.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

1.0 Introduction of New Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) Members.


DISCUSSION: New EPAC members who were not at the June 3rd meeting introduced themselves, their organizations, and the key issues they hope to see addressed in the process. The new member organizations attending were the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE), the Brentwood Area Land Trust, representing agriculture; and the California Trucking Association, representing goods movement. Bishop Ranch staff, representing the business park association, will attend future meetings, and EPAC staff are working to identify representatives from health organization(s). Key issues for new members included small business development, getting the workforce to work and out of their cars, inclusion of low and moderate income families and minorities.

2.0 Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) Scope and Function.


DISCUSSION: David Early described the role of the EPAC, which is to advise the CCTA Board, who will receive the EPAC’s input in addition to input from other committees, the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs), and the public. The role of EPAC members is important, as the main forum for discussion among diverse stakeholders, but the CCTA will make the final decision on the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP). The EPAC were presented with a graphic that explains the public process by which the TEP is developed (attached). Mr. Early also presented the EPAC with a schedule clarifying the relationship between the TEP, the Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) and accompanying Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The EPAC will not advise directly on the CTP or RTP, but is welcome to provide input at those meetings.

C-2


Member Brown asked for clarity regarding the EPAC’s role vis a vis policies that may be included in a new sales tax measure. Mr. Early confirmed that these policies will be within the EPAC’s realm.

3.0 Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) Ground Rules.


DISCUSSION: David Early reviewed the EPAC Ground Rules. These rules will apply to the organization and conduct of EPAC business. Mr. Early explained that the EPAC is subject to the Brown Act, which requires that a quorum of 13 or more EPAC members not attend the same event at the same time or discuss EPAC issues serially.

Member Campbell expressed concern that the Brown Act might keep members from working with their partners on the EPAC. Mr. Early responded that partners can continue working together so long as there is not a quorum, and clarified that EPAC members are encouraged to discuss EPAC issues within their organizations and with their constituents.

4.0 Presentation on Results of Project Performance Evaluation.


DISCUSSION: Martin Engelmann, Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Deputy Executive Director, presented the results of a qualitative evaluation of major projects in relation to Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) performance criteria. The information is being provided to the EPAC as context for use in developing a Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) recommendation. He answered questions from EPAC members about the criteria and methodology by which these projects were evaluated.

Member Fields asked whether the EPAC would see quantitative analysis of each project. Martin Engelmann responded that not all projects are evaluated this way, but if EPAC members have questions about a specific project, staff can provide them with any available specific studies.

Member Paris asked about the number of projects evaluated. Martin Engelmann clarified that there are 79 projects, one of which combines two other projects.

Member Fields stated that he would like to get more data behind the reason for the thumbs up and thumbs down evaluation. For example, economic vitality and climate protection. He gave the example of Pacheco Blvd. widening, assuming that it was considered neutral because of its bicycle and pedestrian improvements, not the road widening.

C-3


Mr. Engelmann confirmed that any project that increases auto capacity is not considered “supportive” of climate, unless it contains bicycle and pedestrian improvements.

Member Lyddan asked whether the evaluation is based on the MTC model, and expressed interest in linking infill and Priority Development Area (PDA) sites with Priority Conservation Areas (PCA).

Member Brown asked what the evaluation means for adequate housing and low-income displacement; whether the thumbs-up evaluation means that a project without housing receives a positive evaluation regardless of its impacts on affordable housing upstream or downstream.

Mr. Engelmann responded that the housing criteria correspond to MTC guidance, and is based on the past performance of the jurisdiction in which the project is located in meeting their housing need. Because East County did extraordinarily well in this respect, while West County did not due to the recession, to be fair CCTA staff gave a positive evaluation to projects in jurisdictions that have an approved housing element for the next cycle.

Member Cunningham asked whether there were background documents on each project available. He also asked about the intersection between these projects and local and county housing opportunities, congested areas, commute corridors, etc.

Mr. Engelmann responded that not every project has a fact sheet; staff will provide the EPAC with those that they have. He will engage the CCTA’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) staff to find out if they can overlay information about existing housing densities, future housing production, etc.

Member Connelly asked whether the criteria addresses the goal of increasing Gross Regional Product (GRP), improving goods movement, removing cars from roads, and providing construction jobs. Member Fields seconded this issue.

Mr. Engelmann responded that any investment in transportation increases GRP by creating jobs and selling goods. Projects that reduce the delay are considered positive; any project that would increase the delay would not support the GRP.

Member Ramos expressed concern about level of priority addressing impacts on the maintenance of existing system, and made a formal request to address the maintenance issue. He is apprehensive that if the public is displeased with the current state of maintenance on transportation infrastructure, a measure supporting new investments will not be popular. Member Ramos suggested that the CCTA exceed rather than conform to MTC guidance, including addressing cost per Vehicle Mile Traveled.

C-4


Member Devalcourt expressed concern that this may be the only assessment being done between this point and the EIR, given the EPAC’s interest in exploring a whole range of issues with the evaluation.

Member Seifel seconded the interest in connecting Priority Conservation Areas to the evaluation, as well as Priority Industrial Areas, which are very relevant for goods movement and economic vitality.

5.0 Schedule and Topics of Future Meetings.

ACTION: The EPAC voted 15-5 to extend the August meeting to four hours.

DISCUSSION: David Early outlined the schedule of future EPAC meetings, which includes meetings four, five, and six in September and October at which the EPAC will discuss the projects they would like to see move forward, meeting 7, at which staff will present a package that represents the EPAC’s direction, and meetings 8 and 9, at which the EPAC will hear feedback from others and fine tune the package. Mr. Early also presented a list of potential topics for future meetings, inviting EPAC members to comment on items to add; the order in which to address the topics; and information needed from staff. He described the presentations planned For the August 10th meeting, including presentations from the RTPCs and transit agencies.

In addition to these, EPAC members requested presentations on the following topics:

Caltrans 2040 Transportation Plan

Communications plan and polling strategy

Past performance of TEP investments: what worked and what missed the mark

History and successes with Alameda and/or Contra Costa Counties’ previous ballot

measures

Member Devalcourt requested that the EPAC take a look at future polling results to ensure that respondents are giving the CCTA realistic priorities, not a “pie-in-the-sky” wish list.

Ross Chittenden, CCTA Deputy Executive Director, Projects, noted that a discussion of the communication plan and public outreach plan for the remainder of 2015 is on the July 15th CCTA Board agenda. Mr. Early added that polling could be added to the agenda for the August EPAC meeting, with EPAC members deciding whether they have time to address it.

Member Connelly expressed concern that a two hour meeting in August would not be enough to hear presentations and also have time for a meaningful discussion.

C-5


Mr. Early clarified that it is possible to add meetings or extend the meeting time, but not possible to defer any of the content to the September meeting and stay on deadline.

Member Lydon requested a briefing on Caltrans Sacramento on the transportation plan for 2040, as it is a transforming document and the State is part of the County’s environment.

Member Allen stated that he wants to look at the TEP from an investment package point of view, having several scenarios to look at, as is being done at the regional and countywide (CTP) level, rather than individual projects, to show how a different set of packages of investments perform across a range of metrics.

Mr. Early noted that this is a suggestion for the September and October meetings.

Member Allen clarified that he would like to see the EPAC give information on scenarios and what the process should be before the September meeting, because if it doesn’t happen until the September meeting, he is concerned there will not be enough time.

Member Brown requested to hear what the promises, expectations, and actual performance on issues such as growth and congestion management were on the investments made using funds from the previous ballot measure.

Member Ramos mentioned that several EPAC members worked on the Alameda County measure that failed the first time, and suggested that if they had taken the polling more seriously, it might have won the first time. He requested to discuss current maintenance needs and the maintenance impact of proposed TEP projects.

Member Paris asked why there will not be presentations in August from all transit operators, and requested that the presenters give their priorities. Mr. Early explained that the transit presentations would be consolidated to save time, and confirmed that the presenters will discuss their priorities.

Member Connelly requested that the transit agencies and RTPCs present their priority projects with a focus on projects that would be most likely to gain support for a ballot measure.

Member Lampe expressed a desire to discuss how actual transit riders will be impacted, Member Lampe further suggested that EPAC members engage in discussions, rather than just being talked at, and requested that materials arrive sooner than three days in advance.

Mr. Early reminded the EPAC that this is a several month process, there will be time for in-depth discussion in future meetings, and that before the discussion they need to hear the information. He asked forbearance that the EPAC will need to listen to the presentations at the August meeting, but he noted that meetings starting in September will involve detailed discussions about the TEP, and that the August meeting will include EPAC discussion to prepare

C-6


for the TEP discussions in September and beyond. Mr. Early offered to provide the EPAC with links to the RTPC proposals/packages when they become publicly available.

Member Allen asked when scenarios would be able to be discussed, i.e. at the August meeting, or later. Mr. Early said that there will likely not be time to discuss scenarios at the August meeting, but scenarios and packages may be one of the options for addressing the September meeting.

Member Weir requested staff sum up the total cost of projects to evaluate it in terms of overall schedule and scale, and requested that meetings always start and stop on time.

Mr. Early referred Member Weir to the cost figures in Martin Engelmann’s presentation. Alternative scenarios will also include summed project and program costs.

Mr. Early asked the EPAC whether they wanted more time at the August meeting. There was general consensus among EPAC members that more time should be allotted in August to these presentations. A 15-5 vote was made to extend the August meeting to three or four hours rather than to add an extra meeting, with the understanding that the EPAC may need to talk in August about extending the September meetings, as well as additional data needs. Mr. Early noted that he had also heard a desire to discuss at the August meeting principles and packages by which the projects might be evaluated, as well as discussion of policy issues and programs. The August 10 meeting was set for 11:30am-4:00pm.

Mr. Early proposed that EPAC members think about what principles they would like to emphasize, and come to the first meeting in September ready to discuss project packages based on principles and kinds of projects rather than specific individual projects. He stated that staff and consultants could create alternative scenarios as a starting point for discussion. There as apparent consensus in favor of this suggestion.

Member Fields requested information about the economic and job creation aspect of projects to use as criteria for evaluation of projects/packages.

Member Campbell requested a presentation about how to come up with a great plan and how to take it and turn it into a campaign that goes on the ballot (and wins). He would like to hear from the Regional Transportation Planning Councils (RTPC) why their priority projects will help win a ballot measure, not just how they will help the RTPCs. He suggested Member Fields give this presentation.

Member Fields offered to give the presentation, and also suggested Art Dao or Tess Lengyel at ACTC as alternative presenters.

6.0 Adjournment to Next meeting:

The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 am to the next meeting of August 10, 2015.

C-7


Organization Representative

Mtg 1

Mtg 2

Mtg 3

Mtg 4

Mtg 5

Mtg 6

Mtg 7

Mtg 8

Mtg 9

Jun 3 Jul-1

Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) David Sharples N Y*

Bay Area Council Mike Cunningham Y Y

Bike East Bay Dave Campbell Y Y

Building and Construction Trades Council Bob Lilley Y Y

Business Industry Association Lisa Vordebreuggen Y Y

Brentwood Agricultural Trust Kathryn Lyddan N Y

California Alliance for Jobs Andy Fields Y Y

California Trucking Association Eric Sauer N N

Central Labor Council Margaret Hanlon-Gradie

Y* Y

Community College District Tim Leong Y N

Contra Costa County Taxpayers Association Jack Weir Y Y

County Office of Education Bruce Burns Y* N

East Bay Economic Development Alliance Dennis Freeman Y Y

East Bay Leadership Council Kristin Connelly Y Y

East Bay Regional Park District Sean Dougan Y N

Genesis Rev. Hubert Ivery Y* Y*

Greenbelt Alliance Joel Devalcourt Y Y

Hospital Council Rebecca Rozen N N

Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative Rich Seithel Y Y

Paratransit Coordinating Council Rita Xavier Y Y

C-8


Rehabilitation Services of Northern California Debbie Toth Y Y*

Save Mount Diablo Ron Brown Y Y

Sierra Club Patrisha Piras Y Y

TRANSDEF Peter Lydon Y Y

TRANSFORM Joel Ramos Y Y

United Contractors Emily Cohen Y Y

Urban Habitat Bob Allen Y Y

C-9

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee

Meeting Date: August 10, 2015

Subject EPAC Meeting Calendar

Date Time Location

Wed June 3, 2015 10am – 1pm

Alameda Ballroom

Embassy Suites Walnut Creek

1345 Treat Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Wed July 1, 2015 10am – 12pm

Contra Costa Ballroom



Mon August 10, 2015 11:30pm – 4:00pm




Mon September 14, 2015 1:30pm – 3:30pm




Mon September 28, 2015 1:30pm – 3:30pm




Mon October 12, 2015 1:30pm – 3:30pm




Mon October 26, 2015 1:30pm – 3:30pm




Mon December 7, 2015 1:30pm – 3:30pm




Attachment – Item D.1

D.1-1



Subject EPAC Membership

1. Bay Area Council

Mike Cunningham

Emily Loper (A)

2. Bike East Bay

Dave Campbell

Kenji Yamada (A)

3. Building and Construction Trades Council

Bob Lilley

Alternate to be determined

4. Building Industry Association

Lisa Vordebreuggen

Bob Glover (A)

5. California Alliance for Jobs

Andy Fields

Michael Quigley (A)

6. Central Labor Council

Margaret Hanlon-Gradie

Cheryl Brown (A)

7. Contra Costa Community College District

Tim Leong


8. Contra Costa County Taxpayers Association

Jack Weir

Mike McGill (A)

9. Contra Costa County Office of Education

Bruce Burns

Terry Koehne (A)

10. East Bay Economic Development Alliance


D.2-1

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee August 10, 2015

Page 2 of 3

Dennis Freeman

Anne O (A)

11. East Bay Leadership Council

Kristin Connelly

Steve Van Wart (A)

12. East Bay Regional Park District

Sean Dougan

Erich Pfuehler (A)

13. Genesis

Reverend Hubert Ivery

Mary Lim-Lampe (A)

14. Greenbelt Alliance

Joel Devalcourt

Tom Brickley (A)

15. Paratransit

Rita Xavier

Shirley Cressey (A)

16. Rehabilitation Services of Northern California

Debbie Toth

Tighe Boyle (A)

17. Save Mount Diablo

Ron Brown;

Seth Adams (A)

18. TRANSFORM

Joel Ramos

Geoffrey Johnson (A)

19. United Contractors

Emily Cohen

Man-Li Lin Kelly (A)

20. Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE)

David Sharples

Jovana Fajardo (A)

21. Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative

Rich Seithel

D.2-2

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee August 10, 2015

Page 3 of 3

Jamar Stamps (A)

22. Sierra Club

Patrisha Piras

Matt Williams (A)

23. TRANSDEF

Peter Lydon

David Schonbrunn (A)

24. Urban Habitat

Bob Allen

Ellen Wu (A)

25. California Trucking Association

Eric Sauer

Chris Shimoda (A)

26. Brentwood Agricultural Land Trust

Kathryn Lyddan

To be determined (A)

27. Business Parks

Alex Mehran *

Chris Truebridge (A) *

28. Public Health

Rebecca Rozen **


29. John Muir Trust

Linus Eukel **


* Approved at July 15 Authority Meeting

** Interim appointment by CCTA Chair

D.2-3



Subject Action Item List

No. Action Item Response Due Status

1 Identify new EPAC member to

represent health issues.

Hospital Council of Northern and

Central California selected to join

the EPAC

8/10/15 Closed

2 Set up presentations regarding

Caltrans CTP, CCTA Communications

Plan, and history of ballot measures.

Presenters confirmed 8/10/15 Closed

3 Provide RTPC proposals to EPAC

members.

Will be provided at 8/10 EPAC

meeting

8/10/15 Closed

4 Develop 3-4 alternative scenarios for

September discussion.

9/14/15 Open

5 Provide available project fact sheets

regarding projects that are being

considered for the TEP

Will be discussed at 8/10 EPAC

meeting

8/10/15 Open

6 Provide GIS data regarding housing

densities and housing production

Will be discussed at 8/10 EPAC

meeting

8/10/15 Open


D.3-1

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting AGENDA

Documents

Transcript of Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting AGENDA