Expected utility is always used as a heuristic Konrad Talmont-Kaminski Marie Curie-Sklodowska U.,...
-
Upload
jasmin-terry -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Expected utility is always used as a heuristic Konrad Talmont-Kaminski Marie Curie-Sklodowska U.,...
Expected utilityis always used as aheuristic
Konrad Talmont-Kaminski
Marie Curie-Sklodowska U., Poland
Line of argument
Problem with bounded rationality
Dual systems of reasoning
What is a heuristic?
Expected utility as a heuristic
H. Simon
Reason in
Human Affairs,
1983
Bounded rationality
Processes satisficing not
maximising
Methods context-dependent
Reasoning consists of heuristics
All reasoning?
Heuristics all the way up?
What about logical reasoning?
What about scientific reasoning?
Does not look like heuristics
But…
Simon’s explanation of discovery
of Boyle’s Law
J. Evans
K. Frankish
S. Sloman
K. Stanovich
D. Kahneman
& others
Dual reasoning
System 1
Heuristics
Intuitive, quick, innate, automatic
System 2
Real reasoning
Logical, slow, learned, conscious
Kahneman’s system 1
Simple heuristics
Anchoring & adjustment,
representativeness, availability
Descriptive
Focus on errors produced
Necessitated by empirical data
But Gigerenzer’s critique
Kahneman’s system 2
Logical reasoning
Utility theory, etc.
Descriptive
but also normative
Necessitated by desire to
maintain classical norms of
rationality &
Need to explain ‘system 2’
reasoning
Expected utility
Paradigmatic example
If EU functions as heuristic,
(plausibly) all reasoning does
EU does not function as
Kahneman heuristic
Need to go back to Simon’s
concept
Simon
Not necessarily
Not necessarily
Not necessarily
Not necessarily
Kahneman
Intuitive
Innate
Quick
Automatic
Simon’s heuristics
Very broad category
Kahneman examples
Behavioural adaptations
Scientific reasoning
In danger of becoming
vacuous
Only useful if it supports
substantive generalisations
Bill Wimsatt
Reengineering
Philosophy for
Limited
Beings, 2007
Common traits of heuristics
1. Fallible
2. Efficient
3. Systematically biased
4. Problem-transforming
5. Purpose relative
6. Descended from other
heuristics
EU as heuristic?
EU formalism does not look like a
heuristic
But how is EU applied in real
situations?
Using simplifying assumptions
Need to consider
formalism+assumption
Traits of EU+assumptions
1. Fallible
2. Efficient
3. Systematically biased
4. Problem-transforming
5. Purpose relative
6. Descended from other
heuristics
?
?
Heuristics all the way up
EU functions as a heuristic
Maximising formalism situated in
satisficing methodology
Same phenomenon in other
cases?
Kahneman’s ‘system 2’ not
descriptive
Probably not primitively
normative, either
H. Mercier
D. Sperber
Why do
Humans
Reason,
BBS
forthcoming
Conclusions
It is heuristics all the way up
Kahneman’s conception of
heuristics very limited
Simon’s conception much
broader and more useful
Need to go back to Simon
Thank you
Konrad Talmont-Kaminski
In a Mirror, Darkly: How the
Supernatural Reflects
Rationality (forthcoming)
deisidaimon.wordpress.com