Exp 3 Tensile Test
-
Upload
jagathisswary-satthi -
Category
Documents
-
view
255 -
download
0
Transcript of Exp 3 Tensile Test
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
1/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
ELEMENTS OF MATERIAL SCIENCE LAB REPORT
EXPERIMENT 3: TENSILE TEST
CHAN KAH FAI (GROUP 4)
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE & BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
16 FEBRUARY 2011
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
2/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
2
Table of Contents
Contents Page Number
1.0 Introduction 3
2.0 Objectives 4
3.0 Material and Methodology 4
4.0 Procedure 5
5.0 Calculations 6
6.0 Results 7
7.0 Discussions 20
8.0 Conclusions 22
9.0 Limitations of the Experiment/ Difficulties Encountered 22
10.0 Reference 22
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
3/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
3
1.0 Introduction
One of the most common mechanical tests used to evaluate the strength of
materials is tensile test. Tensile tests are performed in order to collect data to be used in
selecting materials for engineering applications. Tensile tests are often used to predict the
behaviour of a material under forms of loading other than unaxial tension. The tests are
carried out by applying a pulling force to the sample in a relatively short time at a
constant rate.
The strength of the material is the primary concern in tensile tests. The strength of
a material can be measured in either the stress required to cause plastic deformation to the
material or the maximum stress the material are able to withstand. The force applied on
the material could be collected and converted into several graphs in order to obtain
certain important values of the materials.
The mechanical properties of materials such as metals and alloys which are very
important for engineering applications in structural designs could be obtained from the
tensile tests are as following:-
1. Modulus of elasticity
2. Yield strength at 0.2% offset
3. Ultimate tensile strength
4. Percent elongation at fracture
5. Percent reduction in area at fracture
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
4/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
4
2.0 Objectives
1. To identify the strength of materials, metals and alloys.
2. To identify the materials behaviour under a tensile force.
3. To identify the important parameters through tensile test such as Youngs
Modulus, yield stress, and ultimate tensile stress.
3.0 Materials and Apparatus
Materials : Brass and carbon-steel specimens
Apparatus : Universal testing machine
The types of samples used for the tensile test vary considerably. The specimens
are usually have enlarged ends or shoulders for gripping. The most important part of the
specimens is the gage section. The cross-sectional area of the gage section is reduced to
ensure that deformation and failure will be concentrated in this region.
The gage length is the region over which measurements are made and is centred
within the reduced section. For metals with a thick cross-section such as a plate, a 0.050in
diameter round specimens are commonly used [Figure 3.1 (a)]. For metals with thinner
cross-sections such as sheet, flat specimens are used [Figure 3.2(b)]. A 2-in gage length
within the specimens are the most common used cage length for tensile tests.
Figure 3.1 (a) Figure 3.1 (b)
Standard round tension test Standard rectangular tension
specimen with 2-in gage length. test specimen with 2-in gage length.
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
5/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
5
4.0 Procedure
1. The original gage length and the area of the specimen are measured using a
vernier calliper.
2. The tensile test for the specimen is carried out using the Universal testing
machine under the supervision of the lab tutor.
3. After the test is completed, the percent elongation and percent reduction of area
are obtained.
4. From the plot of force versus strain, the graph of engineering stress versus
engineering strain is obtained.
5. The Youngs Modulus, ultimate tensile stress, 0.2% offset yield stress and
fracture stress are obtained for the specimen.
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
6/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
6
5.0 Calculations
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain:
3. Ultimate tensile strength:
4. Percent elongation: % elongation = x 100%
5. Percent reduction in area: % reduction in area =
6. Youngs Modulus or modulus of elasticity can be obtained from the linear
relationship between stress and strain in the elastic region of t he engineering
stress-strain diagram.
7. Yield strength is the strength at which a metal or alloy shows significant plastic
deformation. Because there is no definite point on the stress-strain curve where
elastic strain ends and plastic begins, the yield strength is chosen to be the
strength when a definite amount of plastic strain has occurred, for example, 0.2%
offset yield strength.
where, F= average uniaxial tensile force
Ao = original cross-sectional area
l = new length of specimen after being extended by uniaxial tensil force
lo = original length of specien
Fmax = maximum tensile force
Af = final cross-sectional area
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
7/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
7
6.0 Results
Brass 60% Copper/40% Zinc [Wed Batch 1]
Diameter : 0.005 m Max Force : 2752.0 N
Ultimate Tensile Strength :140.158 Mpa Elongation : 22.28 %
Graph of Force against Extension
y = -5.3253x6
+ 94.633x5
- 658.43x4
+ 2342.9x3
- 4762.9x2
+ 5154.1x + 360.81
R2
= 0.9748
0.0
250.0
500.0
750.0
1000.0
1250.0
1500.0
1750.0
2000.0
2250.0
2500.0
2750.0
3000.0
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.8 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0
Extension (mm)
Force(N)
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain: Extension of Specimen
0.00253. Ultimate tensile stress : 2752.0
1.96E-5
= 140.158 Mpa
4. Percent elongation: 0.0307 0.0250 x 100
0.0250 = 22.8%
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
8/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
8
5. Youngs Modulus :
Graph of Stress against Strain
y = -7E+13x6
+ 5E+13x5
- 1E+13x4
+ 2E+12x3
- 2E+11x2
+ 7E+09x + 2E+07
R2
= 0.9748
0.0
10000000.0
20000000.0
30000000.0
40000000.0
50000000.0
60000000.0
70000000.0
80000000.0
90000000.0
100000000.0
110000000.0
120000000.0
130000000.0
140000000.0
150000000.0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24
Strain ()
S
tress()
From the graph above, Youngs Modulus:
= 110.0 MPa
0.023
= 4.783GPa
Yield Strength: 110.0 MPa
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
9/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
9
Brass 60% Copper/40% Zinc [Wed Batch 2]
Diameter : 0.005 m Max Force : 2362.5 N
Ultimate Tensile Strength : 120.321 MPa Elongation : 17.46%
Graph of Force against Extension
y = -24.403x6
+ 322.39x5
- 1634.9x4
+ 4094x3
- 5712.2x2
+ 4641.7x + 491.05
R2
= 0.9741
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
1750
2000
2250
2500
2750
3000
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6
Extension (mm)
Force(N)
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain: Extension of Specimen
0.00253. Ultimate tensile stress : 2362.5
1.96E-5
= 120.321 Mpa
4. Percent elongation: 0.029365 0.0250 x 100
0.0250 = 17.46%
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
10/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
10
5. Youngs Modulus :
Graph of Stress against Strain
y = -3E+14x6
+ 2E+14x5
- 3E+13x4
+ 3E+12x3
- 2E+11x2
+ 6E+09x + 3E+07
R2
= 0.9741
0.0
10000000.0
20000000.0
30000000.0
40000000.0
50000000.0
60000000.0
70000000.0
80000000.0
90000000.0
100000000.0
110000000.0
120000000.0
130000000.0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19
Strain ()
S
tress()
From the graph above, Youngs Modulus:
= 70.0 MPa
0.08
= 0.875 GPa
Yield Strength: 70.0 MPa
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
11/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
11
Brass 60% Copper/40% Zinc [Wed Batch 3]
Diameter : 0.005 m Max Force : 2808.0 N
Ultimate Tensile Strength : 143.01 MPa Elongation : 14.832%
Graph of Force against Extension
y = -7.7714x6
+ 152.63x5
- 975.76x4
+ 2899.3x3
- 5008.8x2
+ 5515.6x - 301.72
R2
= 0.9905
-500.0
-250.0
0.0
250.0
500.0
750.0
1000.0
1250.0
1500.0
1750.0
2000.0
2250.0
2500.0
2750.0
3000.0
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00
Extension (mm)
Force(N)
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain: Extension of Specimen
0.0025
3. Ultimate tensile stress : 2808.01.96E-5
= 143.01 Mpa
4. Percent elongation: 0.028708 0.0250 x 100
0.0250 = 14.832%
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
12/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
12
5. Youngs Modulus:
Graph of Stress against Strain
y = -1E+14x6
+ 8E+13x5
- 2E+13x4
+ 2E+12x3
- 2E+11x2
+ 7E+09x - 2E+07R
2= 0.9905
-30000000.0
-20000000.0
-10000000.0
0.0
10000000.0
20000000.0
30000000.0
40000000.0
50000000.0
60000000.0
70000000.0
80000000.0
90000000.0
100000000.0
110000000.0
120000000.0
130000000.0
140000000.0
150000000.0
160000000.0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16
Strain ()
Stress()
From the graph above, Youngs Modulus:
= 110.0 MPa
0.032
= 3.438 GPa
Yield Strength: 110.0 MPa
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
13/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
13
Brass 60% Copper/40% Zinc [Thurs Batch 1]
Diameter : 0.005 m Max Force : 2127.5 N
Ultimate Tensile Strength : 108.352 MPa Elongation : 22.77%
Graph of Force against Extension
y = -1.123x6
+ 20.492x5
- 135.32x4
+ 422.58x3
- 979.72x2
+ 2182.6x - 333.64
R2
= 0.9784
-500.0
-250.0
0.0
250.0
500.0
750.0
1000.0
1250.0
1500.0
1750.0
2000.0
2250.0
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.8 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0
Extension (mm)
Force(N)
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain: Extension of Specimen
0.0025
3. Ultimate tensile stress : 2127.51.96E-5
= 108.352 Mpa
4. Percent elongation: 0.0306925 0.0250 x 1000.0250 = 22.77%
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
14/22
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
15/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
15
Brass 60% Copper/40% Zinc [Thurs Batch 2]
Diameter : 0.005 m Max Force : 9630.0 N
Ultimate Tensile Strength : 476.7 MPa Elongation : 37.52%
Graph of Force against Extension
y = -0.2523x6
+ 9.1882x5
- 126.63x4
+ 795.82x3
- 2281.9x2
+ 4057.6x - 814.06
R2
= 0.9972
-2000.0
-1000.0
0.0
1000.0
2000.0
3000.0
4000.0
5000.0
6000.0
7000.0
8000.0
9000.0
10000.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
Extension (mm)
Force(N)
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain: Extension of Specimen
0.0025
3. Ultimate tensile stress : 9360.0
1.96E-5
= 476.7 Mpa
4. Percent elongation: 0.03438 0.0250 x 100
0.0250 = 37.52%
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
16/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
16
5. Youngs Modulus:
Graph of Stress against Stress
y = -3E+12x6
+ 5E+12x5
- 3E+12x4
+ 6E+11x3
- 7E+10x2
+ 5E+09x - 4E+07
R2
= 0.9972
-100000000.0
-50000000.0
0.0
50000000.0
100000000.0
150000000.0
200000000.0
250000000.0
300000000.0
350000000.0
400000000.0
450000000.0
500000000.0
550000000.0
0 0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15 0.175 0.2 0.225 0.25 0.275 0.3 0.325 0.35 0.375 0.4
Strain ()
St
ress()
From the graph above, Youngs Modulus:
= 470.0 MPa
0.252
= 1.865 GPa
Yield Strength: 470.0 MPa
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
17/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
17
Copper Steel [Wed Batch 1]
Diameter : 0.005 m Max Force : 10337.5 N
Ultimate Tensile Strength : 4520.0 MPa Elongation : 39.5%
Graph of Force against Extension
y = -0.1616x6
+ 8.7988x5
- 153.96x4
+ 1102.8x3
- 3128.3x2
+ 3815.6x - 458.63
R2
= 0.9965
-2000.0
-1000.0
0.0
1000.0
2000.0
3000.0
4000.0
5000.0
6000.0
7000.0
8000.0
9000.0
10000.0
11000.0
12000.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5
Extension (mm)
Force(N)
1. Engineering stress:
2. Engineering strain: Extension of Specimen
0.0025
3. Ultimate tensile stress : 10337.5
1.96E-5
= 526.484 Mpa
4. Percent elongation: 0.03496 0.0250 x 100
0.0250 = 39.85%
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
18/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
18
5. Youngs Modulus:
Graph of Stress against Strain
y = -2E+18x6
+ 4E+17x5
- 3E+16x4
+ 9E+14x3
- 1E+13x2
+ 5E+10x - 2E+07
R2
= 0.9965
-50000000.0
0.0
50000000.0
100000000.0
150000000.0
200000000.0
250000000.0
300000000.0
350000000.0
400000000.0
450000000.0
500000000.0
550000000.0
600000000.0
0.000 0.003 0.005 0.008 0.010 0.013 0.015 0.018 0.020 0.023 0.025 0.028 0.030 0.033 0.035 0.038 0.040 0.043
Strain ()
Stress(
)
From the graph above, Youngs Modulus:
= 520.0 MPa
0.028
= 18.57 GPa
Yield Strength: 520.0 MPa
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
19/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
19
Overall Results for All Experiments
Brass
60% Copper/40% Zinc
Day/
Group
Diameter,
d (m)
Ultimate
Tensile
Strength,
ult (MPa)
Maximum
Force,
Fmax (N)
Percent
Elongation
(%)
Youngs
Modulus,
E (GPa)
Yield
Strength,
(Mpa)
Wed
Batch 10.005 140.158 2752.0 22.8 4.783 110.0
Wed
Batch 20.005 120.321 2362.5 17.46 0.875 70.0
Wed
Batch 30.005 143.010 2808.0 14.83 3.348 110.0
ThurBatch 1
0.005 108.352 2127.5 22.77 1.120 103.0
Thur
Batch 20.005 476.7 9630.0 37.52 1.865 470.0
Carbon-Steel
Day/
Group
Diameter,
d (m)
Ultimate
Tensile
Strength,
ult (MPa)
Maximum
Force,
Fmax (N)
Percent
Elongation
(%)
Youngs
Modulus,
E (GPa)
Yield
Strength,
(Mpa)
Wed
Batch 10.005 526.484 10337.5 39.5 1.857 520.0
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
20/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
20
6.0 Discussions
1. Describe what you observe about the specimen after failure.
Ans: Upon the specimen fail, the shapes of the specimen is observed carefully. It is
found that both specimens experienced ductile failure by identifying the cup-
and-cone fracture. However, from the data recorded, it is clearly see that carbon-
steel has higher ductility compare to brass with its higher percentage of elongation.
2. Compare the stress-strain graph that you have obtained for the specimen with that
of an aluminium specimen.
Ans: From the aluminium stress-strain graph obtained, it is clearly seen that the
Youngs Modulus of aluminium is so much lower than brass and carbon-steel.
From the value of Youngs Modulus, we can assume that the ultimate tensile
strength, maximum force, and the yield strength would be lower than brass and
copper-steel provided all specimens are with same area and length in comparisons.
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
21/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 Mechanics and Strength of Materials [Mr. Naveen]16 Feb 2011
21
3. What are some of the factors that may affect the precision of your results in
carrying out this test?
Ans: As we know, there are no materials in this world in perfect, the specimens
themselves might contains flaws such as imperfections arrangement of atoms in
the specimens, voids in the specimens, irregular shape of the specimens and
presence of impurities in the specimens which are almost impossible to be
avoided in materials. These flaws might strongly affect the precisions of the
results when experiment is carried out with the specimens.
With all datas recorded from the Universal testing machine, we are able to
measure the extensions of the specimens and the forces applied to the specimens
precisely and accurately at each points. By carrying out tensile testing on brass and
carbon-steel, the universal testing machine could measure a range of parameters such as
forces applied and extension of specimens until the specimens fail.
Although there are severals failures of the experiments conducted, the datas are
still recoreded as a comparison to the complete experiment. By converting all the datas
recorded into graphs, we are able to calculate a range of parameters to identify thebehaviour and properties such as the engineering stress, engineering strain, ultimate
tensile strength, percentage of elongation, yield strength and Youngs Modulus of each
specimens.
From the overall results of the experiments with is tabulated in a table, it is shown
that Thursday Batch 2 obtained the best results for brass experiment and Wednesday
Batch 1 for Carbon-steel among all other groups. This might due to some limitations or
difficulties occurred when experiment is carried out.
-
7/27/2019 Exp 3 Tensile Test
22/22
Chan Kah Fai 1001025381EE 102 M h i d St th f M t i l [M N ]
7.0 Conclusions
As for the conclusions, we are able to identify the strength of each type of
materials, in this experiment, brass and carbon-steel specimens are used. Using universal
testing machine to carry out the experiment, we are able to observe the behaviour and
properties of the specimens when tensile force is applied.
Upon completing the experiment, with a set of data recorded, all the necessary
steps are calculated and converted to graphs which are graph of force against extension
and engineering stress against engineering strain. By obtaining both types of graphs for
each specimen tested, all important parameters regarding the properties of the materials
could be found. For instant, Youngs modulus which tells us how much force required to
separate the atoms of the materials and cause the material to stretch easily or in other
words, the stiffness of the materials.
8.0 Limitations of the Experiment/ Difficulties Encountered:
1. We are unable to place the specimen firmly to the grip of the universal testing
machine resulting the specimen to slip when the experiment is carried out
2. Specimens that we used in this experiments are not the exactly same for each
specimens due to natural flaws such as imperfections of arrangements of atoms in
the metal.
3. We have difficulties to operate the universal testing machine as we do not
understand well about the functions of the machine.
9.0 Reference
1. Beer, Ferdinand P.; Johnston, E. Russell; Dewolf, John T. (2001).Mechanics of
Materials (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
2. No ownership. Retrieved on 23 Feb 2011. From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_(engineering)
3. No ownership. Retrieved on 23 Feb 2011. From
http://web.mit.edu/course/3/3.11/www/modules/ss.pdf