Existing literature

14
Measures and Determinants of Trust Measures and Determinants of Trust in Transition in Transition Martin Raiser Martin Raiser Alan Rousso Alan Rousso Franklin Steves Franklin Steves Office of the Chief Economist Office of the Chief Economist

description

Measures and Determinants of Trust in Transition Martin Raiser Alan Rousso Franklin Steves Office of the Chief Economist. Existing literature. McMillan, Woodruff (1999), Johnson, McMillan, Woodruff (1999), Frye (2003); Woodruff (2002) trade credit as measure of trust at firm level - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Existing literature

Page 1: Existing literature

Measures and Determinants of Trust in Measures and Determinants of Trust in TransitionTransition

Martin RaiserMartin RaiserAlan RoussoAlan Rousso

Franklin StevesFranklin Steves

Office of the Chief EconomistOffice of the Chief Economist

Page 2: Existing literature

Existing literatureExisting literature

McMillan, Woodruff (1999), Johnson, McMillan, Woodruff (1999), Frye (2003); Woodruff (2002)

– trade credit as measure of trust at firm level

– role of courts, substitute for relational contracting => supports market expansion

– role of networks – complement to courts?; more important than moral attitudes in building trust among firms

Page 3: Existing literature

This paperThis paper

uses country variation in BEEPS 2002 to examine role of courts, networks

– not just firm perceptions but aggregate system – wide effects

divides quality of courts and networks into several dimensions

introduces prepayment as alternative to trade credit – latter may in part be involuntary

Page 4: Existing literature

The BEEPSThe BEEPS

survey in 26 transition economies and Turkey

170-450 firms per country = 6500 total

mainly private, SME’s, sectorally representative of population (50% services in most countries)

survey of managers – combination of perceptions and (rough) financial data

questions on contracts are not relationship specific but average for firm

Page 5: Existing literature

Cross country averagesCross country averages

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Belaru

s

Uzb

ekistan

Azerb

aijan

Kazak

hstan

Yu

goslavia

Lith

uan

ia

BiH

FY

RO

M

Sloven

ia

Hu

ngary

Bu

lgaria

Eston

ia

Polan

d

Prepayment Trade Credit

Page 6: Existing literature

Determinants of prepaymentDeterminants of prepayment

1. The courts & third party enforcement

Perceptions of fairness, cost, ability to enforce decisions

Experience with using courts, previous contract violations, alternative protection

Quality of law “on the books”

Page 7: Existing literature

Determinants of prepayment (Cont.)Determinants of prepayment (Cont.)

2. Relational contracting

Length of business relationship

Change in main customer over last 3 years

Types of customers: government, MNC’s, subsidiaries or parent company, local firms

Page 8: Existing literature

Determinants of prepayment (Cont.)Determinants of prepayment (Cont.)

3. Networks

Source of information on main customer: family/friends, firm insiders, outside sources

Moral attitudes: generalised trust (WVS)

Page 9: Existing literature

Cross country evidence: simple correlationsCross country evidence: simple correlationsPrepayment Trade credit

EBRD ref. -0.71* 0.27

Rule of Law -0.76* 0.23

Legal Ext. -0.54* 0.43*

Court just. -0.62* 0.38*

Court cost 0.30 0.42*

Court enf. 0.06 0.03

Networks ge. -0.13 0.02

Family -0.24 -0.31

Insiders 0.63* 0.14

Bus. Ass. -0.51* -0.04

Legal Trans-plant -0.71* 0.36*

Gen. Trust 0.37* -0.16

Page 10: Existing literature

Firm - country evidenceFirm - country evidencePrepayment Trade credit

General reform environment

Transplant -13.9*** 15.2**

Legal Ext. -7.2*** 4.3***

Perception of Courts

Court fairness - 0.34 0.74

-20.2*** -1.60

Court cost -0.03 1.29**

19.2*** 43.5***

Court enforcement 0.62 -1.46***

7.5*** -21.6***

Experience

Payment delays -1.12 12.4***

Security payments 0.19 -0.86

Protection payments -1.29 0.03

Page 11: Existing literature

Prepayment Trade credit

Relational Contracts

Sales to customers >3 years -0.76 4.0***

Change of major customer 2.0** 1.87

Sales to government -0.02 0.08***

Sales to MNC’s -0.03 0.13***

Sales to subsidiary/parents 0.02 0.05*

Sales to other dom. 0.02 0.10***

Networks

General -0.18 0.36

3.45** -6.15***

Family -0.74* -1.05**

-31.2*** -3.02***

Insiders 0.74* -0.51

3.46 -9.97***

Firm - country evidence cont.Firm - country evidence cont.

Page 12: Existing literature

Summary of the main resultsSummary of the main results

Importance of the courts at country level => systems effect rather than just firm perceptions (or: perceptions are not that inaccurate)

“Justice” of courts more consistent measure of perceived effectiveness of courts than cost or ability to enforce → link to Glaeser/Shleifer (2002)

Page 13: Existing literature

Networks matter but not in uniform waysNetworks matter but not in uniform ways

Networks matter but not in uniform ways

– Family networks build trust but remain perhaps more closed

– Insider networks do not build trust

– Positive role of business associations, Woodruff, Frye

Prepayment better aggregate measure of trust than trade credit:

– Less affected by relational contracting

– Avoids problem of involuntary trade credit

Page 14: Existing literature

Future researchFuture research

Why and how does “justice” of courts matter – the role of capture and influence?

Characteristics of different enterprise networks