Examination and Post

Session Notes

Settlement Site

References

Original

SHLAA

Appendix

Classification

SAMDev Site Site Name Gross ha Summary Total Total Total 2026+

A) Available

now - no legal

or physical

impediment

to

development

now

B) Suitable

Now -

Prepared to

grant

permission

now

B) Suitable

Now - suitable

location for

development

now - reps

against /

quality of

arguments

against/planni

ng issues

D) Developer

involvement/Key

Delivery

Milestones

E) Viability

Consideration

s

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26

Albrighton ALB003

(SAMDev)

(includes

ALB015)

2 Yes Land at White

Acres

1.04 No

impediments

Yes - site

within

development

boundary. Site

adjacent to

conservation

area, so any

development

to have due

regard. Site

development

guidelines

seek high

proportion of

lifetime

homes units,

having regard

to aspiration

in

Neighbourhod

PLan Light for

retirement

age focus

properties.

Yes - small

greenfield site

within village

development

boundary.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues. Site

identified in

Neighbourhoo

d Plan Light.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Small greenfield

site within village

development

boundary.

Sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Identified in

Neighbourhood

Plan Light. Likely

to be delivered.

20 20

Albrighton ALB005 2 No Caravan

Storage,

Station Road

0.22 Part of the site

used for

caravan

storage is long

and thin,

which will

require careful

design to

accommodate

development.

Conversion of

attractive

station

buildings

would also

require good

design.

Yes - the site is

suitable.

Yes - suitable

and

sustainable

location, but

not currently

promoted.

The site is suitable,

available and

potentially

achievable. The

site however is not

currently promoted

and therefore

delivery of site is

uncertain at this

time and therefore

development not

expected within

the next 5 years.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

The site is

suitable, available

and potentially

achievable. The

site however is not

currently

promoted and

therefore delivery

of site is uncertain

at this time and

therefore

development not

expected within

the next 5 years.

0 10 10

5 Year Tests A and B Forecast Build Out Rates (at at 31st March 2014) Forecast Build Out Rates (as at 31st March 2014) Forecast Build Out Rates (as

at 31st March 2014)

5 Year Test C - Delivery

Schedule/Achievability -

Achievable with a realistic

prospect that housing will be

delivered within 5

Agents letter noted - further

follow up provided.

Albrighton ALB002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land East of

Shaw Lane

19.1 No

impediments.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

80 units have

permission.

Neighbourhoo

d Plan (light)

includes all of

the site.

Yes - large

greenfield site

on edge of

village, with

existing

housing

development

on two sides

and railway to

north east.

Main access

from

Kingswood

Road.

Sustainable

development.

Development

company set up. 80

units already have

planning

permission

BR2008/00907

(December 2011).

Overall capacity

now 180 dwellings.

Willing landowner

for whole site.

Assuming only 80

of total to be

delivered in years 1-

5.

Additional

land allocated

will ensure

viability.

Major greenfield

site on edge of

village providing

for an additional

124 dwellings to

supplement

adjoining site with

permission for up

to 80 dwellings

(BR2008/00907).

Reserved Matters

application to be

submitted late

November 2014

for 56 dwellings

(so overall site still

180 dwellings).

Identified in

Neighbourhood

Plan Light.

Sustainable

development.

Willing

landowner. Full

application on site

expected early

2015 for up to 124

additional

dwellings. Likely

to be delivered

but spread over

years 5-7

following on from

site

BR2008/00907.

64 64 30 30 60

Ash Parva ASHP002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land west of

Ash Parva

1.10 Yes - no

impediments.

Single

ownership.

Yes, subject to

requirements

set out in

development

guidelines

regarding

footpath, pond

and car

parking.

Parish Council

support.

Small

greenfield site

on edge of

village. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Current full

planning

application

14/03860/FUL for 8

dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns.

Small greenfield

site on edge of

village. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Current full

planning

application

14/03860/FUL for

8 dwellings. Likely

to be delivered.

8 8

Outline planning applicaton

proposals (14/02286/OUT)

have been put forward on

land opposite Baschurch's

former railway station, which

includes the old sidings and

the now closed Boreatton

Arms pub. (post 31st March

2014) . Total capacity for 50

dwellings, inlcuding land at

BAS019b. BAS019a figures

reduced from 30.

Baschurch BAS019a 2 No Land off

Station Road

(Boreatton

Arms)

0.38 No

impediments.

Within the

settlement

boundary and

potentially

suitable for

development.

The site has no

known policy

restrictions or

physical

limitations

that would

limit

development.

Possible

application in

development

No major

issues

identified.

The site is

suitable, available

and potentially

deliverable. No

major obstacles to

delivery identifed.

5 0 5

Outline planning applicaton

proposals (14/02286/OUT)

have been put forward on

land opposite Baschurch's

former railway station, which

includes the old sidings and

the now closed Boreatton

Arms pub. (post 31st March

2014) . Total capacity for 50

dwellings, inlcuding land at

BAS019b. BAS019b figures

included for 20 in 2nd five

year tranche.

Bschurch BAS019b 6 No Land at Station

Road

tbc No

impediments

but part of a

phased

scheme

Outside

settlement

boundary but

linked to sites

within

boundary.

Potentially

suitable as

part of a

comprehensiv

e

development.

Part of the SHLAA

site lies within

planning

application

14/02286/OUT

No major

issues

identified.

Deliverable within

the 2nd five year

tranche.

10 10 20

Outline planning applicaton

proposals (14/02286/OUT)

have been put forward on

land opposite Baschurch's

former railway station, which

includes the old sidings and

the now closed Boreatton

Arms pub. (post 31st March

2014) . Total capacity for 50

dwellings, inlcuding land at

BAS019b. BAS026 figures

reduced from 34.

Baschurch BAS026 2 No Former

Builders Yard,

Station Road

1.23 The site is

former railway

land that is

currently used

as a

reclamation

yard / builders

yard. The site

is flat and has

been largely

cleared to

support

storage uses.

A temporary

structure

exists on site

to support

current uses.

No major

physical or

legal

impediments

to

development.

Site is subject

to pre-

application

(application

no.)

discussions

with an

application

expected xxx.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Pre-app discussion -

July / August 2014.

Planning consent

by end of 2014.

S.106 by Mid 2015

and some limited

delivery through

2015.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

The site is suitable

for medium

density two storey

housing, subject to

resolution of noise

and vibration due

to proximity of the

railway line.

0 12 13 25

Baschurch BAS017

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land to the

west of

Shrewsbury

Road

2.63 No

impediments.

Yes, subject to

provision of

land for

medical centre

in accordance

with site

development

guidelines.

Outline

planning

permission

granted

subject to

S106

Agreement.

Yes.

Greenfield site

on edge of

village, but

centrally

located and

relatively close

to facilities.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Outline planning

permission granted

subject to S106

Agreement

(14/01123/OUT) on

26/08/14.

No known

viability

concerns.

Requirement

of land for

medical centre

offered by

landowners

linked to

allocation of

site.

Straightforward

greenfield site in

centre of village

now with outline

planning

permission

(14/01123/OUT)

subject to S106

Agreement

(including

provision of land

for new medical

centre). Parish

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered.

15 15 30

Baschurch BAS025

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land to the

rear of Medley

Vale

1.21 Straightforwar

d greenfield

site with

developer

involvement

SAMDev Plan

site and

sustainable

development

No

fundamental

planning

issues raised

Galliers

Homes/Cameron

Homes current

outline application,

aiming for consent

by end of 2014,

then reserved

matters early 2015,

commencing

construction

autumn 2015, with

build out over 18

months.

Application -

14/04174/OUT.

No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

greenfield site

with developer

involvement and

no fundamental

planning issues

raised in

representations:

Galliers

Homes/Cameron

Homes current

outline

application,

aiming for consent

by end of 2014,

then reserved

matters early

2015, commencing

construction

autumn 2015, with

build out over 18

months. Parish

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered.

10 15 25

Baschurch BAS035

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Station Rd

2.25 Greenfield site

with access

available from

Station Road

and scope to

provide school

drop off zone

if required.

Yes, subject to

provision of

land for school

drop off zone

if required.

Parish Council

support.

Yes -

greenfield site

close to

facilities in

village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Current outline

planning

application

(14/02454/OUT)

No known

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site

with access

available from

Station Road and

scope to provide

school drop off

zone, if required.

Current outline

planning

application

(14/02454/OUT).

Parish Council

support. Site likely

to be delivered.

20 20 40

Site included following

completion of cross-

reference work.

Baschurch BAS014 6 No North of

Baschurch /

land at Station

Road

Yes - no

impediments

Planning

permission

granted in

September

2014 for 20

units -

14/02887/FUL

Edge of

settlement

site now with

planning

permisson.

Active developer

interest.

HCA funding

not allocated

so scheme

pushed back

to second 5

year tranche.

Edge of settlement

development now

with full planning

permission.

10 10 20 0.00

Bayston Hill BAY013 2 No Land at Gorse

Lane

0.7 There is

confidence in

the site being

available and

coming

forward for

development.

Although

delivery may

be in the

longer term,

bue to

landownership

issues.

The site is

suitable for

residential

development

at a low

density that

reflects the

character of

the village

location.

Site suitable

for low density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of semi

detached or

detached

dwellings.

The site is suitable

for residential

development at a

low density that

reflects the

character of the

village location

although it is

unlikely to come

forward until the

longer term time

band due to land

ownership.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings. It is

unlikely to come

forward until the

longer term time

band due to land

ownership.

20 20

No additional comments. Bayston Hill BAY016 2 No Development

Land Adj

Leylands

Pulley Lane

Bayston Hill

Shrewsbury

Shropshire

0.49 The site

comprises of

an area which

is currently in

domestic use

as the

extended

garden area of

'Leylands'

adjoining the

north western

edges of the

settlement.

The southern

boundary onto

Pulley Lane is

marked by a

red brick

retaining wall

whilst the land

within is

mainly lawned

with a number

of small trees.

No major

physical

impediments

to delivery.

Went to

committee on

3rd April 2014 -

resolved to

grant subject

to s.106. Total

of 9 dwellings.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

There are no legal

or ownership

problems which

could limit

development here

and the site has

been promoted by

a developer

(Shropshire

Homes).

No known

viability

constraints.

Site is suitable for

a small

development

scheme which has

been resolved to

grant. Site likely

to come forward

during the first 5

years of the

development

framework.

9 9

Bishops Castle BISH019 2 No Livestock

market,

Station Street

0.41 Within

conservation

area. The

amenity value

of the car

park, toilets

and recycling

facilities

outweighs any

development

value.

However, if

the auction

yard was

moved to

another

appropriate

site then that

section of the

site would be

good for

residential

development

as it close to

all facilities

and

employment.

Yes Yes. Site

within existing

town

development

boundary.

A well located site

suitable for

residential

development

subject to the

relocation of the

livestock market.

This therefore

likely to be a longer

term site.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Considered

suitable site within

the development

boundary, but the

project to relocate

the livestock

market could take

a considerable

amount of time.

0 12 12

Bishops Castle BISH020 2 No Rear of

surgery,

Schoolhouse

Lane

0.43 Could

probably only

be developed

in conjunction

with BISH013

due to access

problems but

could achieve

low density

development

here given

topography

and mature

trees.

Yes Yes. Site

within existing

town

development

boundary.

Site is suitable

however is not

currently available.

Site is considered

to be developable

in the longer term

planning period.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Considered

suitable site within

the development

boundary, but not

currently

available.

0 10 10

Bishop's Castle BISH016 2 No Field adj.

Blunden Hall,

Brampton

Road

0.51 The site

should be

developed at a

relatively low

density given

the rural

character of

the area and

recommend

detached or

town house

style

development

here.

Yes. Yes. Site

within existing

town

development

boundary.

Site is suitable

however is not

currently available.

Site is considered

to be developable

in the longer term

planning period.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Considered

suitable site within

the development

boundary, but not

currently

available.

0 15 15

Site deliverable at this scale

and in this time-lime

considering local

infrastructure constraints.

Bishop's Castle BISH013

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Schoolhouse

Lane

1.91 Yes. Single

landowner.

Greenfield site

on edge of

settlement.

Yes Yes -

sustainable

location and

no

fundamental

planning

issues

Site promoted by

landowner -

indicative layout

submitted to

demonstrate

delivery capacity

but landowner not

showing urgency to

bring forward..

No known

viability

constraints

Straightforward

greenfield site.

Town Council

support. Site

deliverable but

spread over years

1-10 to reflect

landowner’s

current approach.

10 10 20 10 10 20

Bletchley BLET001 2 No Land north of

A41

0.28 There is

confidence in

the site being

available and

coming

forward for

development.

There are no

legal or

ownership

problems

which could

limit

development

here and the

site has been

promoted by a

developer/

landowner.

Yes - site is

considered

suitable for

development,

subject to

further

detailed

assessmement

Yes. Within

the village

boundary.

This site is

considered suitable

for development,

subject to further

detailed

assessment.

From the

information

available, it is

considered

that there is a

reasonable

prospect that

housing will

be delivered

on the site as

the site is

suitable and

development

is being

actively

promoted.

This site is

considered

suitable for

development,

subject to further

detailed

assessment.

0 8 8

Within the settlement

boundary.

Bomere Heath BOM008 2 No North of

Cornfield

Close

0.20 This site is a

small flat

field/grassland

, currently in

use for grazing

purposes and

is contained

by mature

hedges and

trees on the

borders. The

site also abuts

existing

housing and

adjoins an

access road.

No major

physical or

legal

impediments

to

development.

The site is

currently

subject to

early

discussions

regarding a

planning

application.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Pre-app discussion -

July / August 2014.

Small development

site, likely to

progress swiftly.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

Recent pre-

application

discussions. Small

development site

which is likely to

progress swiftly.

5 5

Bomere Heath BOM004

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Shrewsbury

Road

5.76 Yes - no

impediments.

Yes, subject to

site

development

guidelines

regarding

provision of

public open

space,

footway, and

other links.

Parish Council

support.

Yes -

greenfield site

close to centre

of village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Galliers

Homes/Cameron

Homes have

advised of

intention to submit

outline application,

aiming for consent

by end of 2014,

then reserved

matters early 2015,

commencing

autumn 2015, with

build out over 30

months;

No known

viability

concerns.

Development of

former recreation

ground with Parish

Council support

and developer

involvement -

Galliers

Homes/Cameron

Homes have

advised of

intention to

submit outline

application,

aiming for consent

by end of 2014,

then reserved

matters early

2015, commencing

autumn 2015, with

build out over 30

months. Likely to

be delivered.

5 15 10 30

Bridgnorth BRID009 2 No Dirlot and

Winchester

Houses,

Wenlock Road

0.3 Commercial

use on the

site, which

was approved

in 2012.

Technically yes

- although no

approach has

been made

recently.

No issues

raised at this

stage,

The site is suitable

for development

and received

planning

permission on

02/04/08 for five

dwellings. This

permission has

subsequently

lapsed.

Commercial use

accepted for site in

2012. Longer term

potential for

housing.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

The site is

comprised of two

large residential

properties.

Surrounding uses

are predominantly

residential

together with the

Police Station and

Bridgnorth District

Council Offices.

0 0 5 5

Discussion to be held at

Bridgnorth Session.

Bridgnorth BRID001 and

BRID20b

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

Wenlock Road,

Tasley

11.90 New junction

onto A458

required.

Linked to

relocation of

Livestock

Market

although

redevelopmen

t of BRID20b

not dependent

on the

relocation

happening in

advance.

Single major

landowner

(Tasley

Estates)

including site

for relocation

of Livestock

Market.

Yes -

considered to

be sustainable

development

delivering

strategic

growth of

major market

town with

limited

realistic

alternatives

and no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Site on edge of

town including

redevelopmen

t of Livestock

Market site -

sustainable

development

with no

fundamental

planning

issues

affecting

suitability.

Planning

objections

submitted

regarding

proposed

allocation, but

major

extension to

town with

limited

realistic

alternatives to

deliver

required

housing and

employment

land.

Site promoted by

principal

employment

land/buildings

provider in

Bridgnorth with

track record of

delivery. Detailed

site investigations

in hand prior to

submission of

planning

application.

Major project

but housing

cross-

subsidises

infrastructure

investment,

relocation of

livestock

market and

provision of

serviced

employment

land.

Site on edge of

town including

redevelopment of

Livestock Market

site - sustainable

development with

no fundamental

planning issues

affecting

suitability.

Planning

objections

submitted

regarding

proposed

allocation, but

major extension to

town with limited

realistic

alternatives to

deliver required

housing and

employment land.

New junction onto

A458 required.

Linked to

relocation of

Livestock Market

although

redevelopment of

BRID20b not

dependent on the

relocation

happening in

advance. Site

promoted by

principal

14 50 50 114 50 36 86

Discussion to be held at

Bridgnorth Session.

Bridgnorth BRID020a

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

Church Lane,

Tasley

12.73 Development

dependent on

access, linked

to progress of

BRID001 and

BRID020b.

Single major

landowner

(Tasley

Estates).

Yes -

considered to

be sustainable

development

delivering

strategic

growth of

major market

town with

limited

realistic

alternatives

and no

fundamental

planning

issues -

subject to

access

provision via

BRID020b and

highway

improvements

on Church

Lane.

Site on edge of

town -

sustainable

development

with no

fundamental

planning

issues

affecting

suitability.

Planning

objections

submitted

regarding

proposed

allocation, but

major

extension to

town with

limited

realistic

alternatives to

deliver

required

housing and

employment

land.

Development

linked to progress

with BRID001 and

BRID20b, so

development not

likely in years 1-6.

Site promoted by

principal

employment

land/buildings

provider in

Bridgnorth with

track record of

delivery.

Major project

linked to

BRID001 and

BRID020b but

housing cross-

subsidises

infrastructure

investment,

relocation of

livestock

market and

provision of

serviced

employment

land.

Site on edge of

town - sustainable

development with

no fundamental

planning issues

affecting

suitability.

Planning

objections

submitted

regarding

proposed

allocation, but

major extension to

Bridgnorth with

limited realistic

alternatives to

deliver required

housing and

employment land.

Development

dependent on

access, linked to

progress of

BRID001 and

BRID020b and

highway

improvements on

Church Lane.

Single major

landowner (Tasley

Estates) including

site for relocation

of Livestock

Market. Housing

cross-subsidises

infrastructure

0 20 50 60 60 190 60 50 110

Broseley BROS021a 2 No Land off

Cockshutt

Lane

1.07 A well located

site suitable

for residential

development

subject to the

relocation of

the existing

businesses.

This therefore

likely to be a

longer term

site.

Prepared to

grant

permission,

but will

require the

location of

existing

businesses.

Smaller part of

site

BROS021/09,

which is fully

inside of

settlement

development

boundary.

Site has been

actively marketed

in the past.

From the

information

available, it is

considered

that there is a

reasonable

prospect that

housing may

be delivered

on the site.

A well located site

which is suitable

for residential

development, but

there would be a

delay in delivering

housing due to the

current active use

of the site.

0 10 10

Broseley BROS023a 2 No Land off

Barratts Hill

0.27 Smaller part of

site

BROS023/09,

fully inside of

settlement

development

boundary.

Site located to

the west of

the settlement

inside of the

settlement

development

boundary and

fully within

the

Conservation

Area for

Broseley.

Site is within

the settlement

boundary and

suitable

subject to a

high quality

application

due to its

relationship to

the

conservation

area.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Active developer

interest. Small site

with completion

within first 5 years.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete the

housing is

good.

Small sensitive

urban site which is

suitable subject to

a high quality

application due to

its relationship to

the conservation

area.

8 8

Planning approval now

granted (November 2014)

subject to s.106. It is

understood the s.106

agreement is close to

completion.

Broseley BROS011 2 Yes Dark Lane,

Broseley

3.22 No major

impediments

to

development

now with

progress being

made on s.106

issues.

New Taylor

Wimpey

application

with a revised

site capacity of

88 dwellings.

Historically

planning

committee

had resolved

to grant an

application for

94 dwellings.

Considered a

sustainable

location with

the principle

of

development

having been

historically

agreed by

planning

commmittee.

The site is also

an allocated

housing site in

the Bridgnorth

District Local

Plan (saved

policy BR01)

Major housing

developer engaged

in moving forward

with the site. S.106

likely to be

completed to

accompany officer

report for planning

committee by end

of 2014.

No major

concerns

regarding the

viability of the

scheme with

matters

addressed

regarding land

stability and

affordable

housing.

New Taylor

Wimpey

application with a

revised site

capacity of 88

dwellings.

Application and

s.106 progressing

in parallel andf

expected to report

to planning

committee by the

end of 2014.

30 30 28 88

Bucknell BUCK004 2 No Field opposite

junior school

1.46 Square level

site bounded

by road on

two sides

(opposite

school and

station) with

residential on

the other two

sides.

Currently very

narrow access

opposite

station.

Clearly

defined

boundaries,

hedges or post

and wire, no

mature trees,

pond marked

on M3. Used

for sheep

grazing. No

legal

impediments

to delivery.

Due to the

nature of the

site and its

current use as

farm land, the

site has been

placed within

the latest

timeframe for

development

potential.

The land,

although

suitable and

available is

essentially

Greenfield

land and

should be

developed

after other

more suitable

brownfield

developments

have been

taken forward.

No support for

delivery within the

plan period.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

not currently

economically

viable but

could become

more viable in

later years due

to the

increased

capacity for a

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing.

Site suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings. Due to

the nature of the

site and its current

use as farm land,

the site has been

placed within the

latest timeframe

for development

potential.

0 0 0 45

Bucknell BUCK005 2 No Grazing in

centre of

village

3.14 Large irregular

shaped slightly

sloping (down

towards road)

open space in

the centre of

village marked

as playing

fields but is

horse grazing.

Part of site to

west adjoins

Motte. No

legal

impediments

to delivery.

Due to the

nature of the

site and its

current use as

farm land, the

site has been

placed within

the latest

timeframe for

development

potential.

The land,

although

suitable and

available is

essentially

Greenfield

land and

should be

developed

after other

more suitable

brownfield

developments

have been

taken forward.

No support for

delivery within the

plan period.

From the

information

available, it is

considered

that there is a

reasonable

prospect that

housing will

be delivered

on the site as

the site is

suitable and

development

is likely in the

medium term.

Site suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings. Due to

the nature of the

site and its current

use as farm land,

the site has been

placed within one

of the latest

timeframes for

development

potential.

0 0 0 50

Bucknell BUCK001sd

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at the

Coal/ Timber

Yard

(extended

site)

5.95 Site in Clun

catchment

area, so waste

water

treatment

constraint

awaiting

investment by

STW - in a

current

programme

and due at

2018.

No, pending

STW

treatment

works upgrade

(2018) or

possibly

publication of

nutrient

management

plan and

action

programme.

Brownfield

site with some

significant

ecological

value at

margins and

surface water

drainage

issues -

mitigation

measures

required.

Parish Council

support.

Bucknell is

sustainable

settlement -

identified in

current and

proposed

Local Plans.

No in principle

planning

concerns

except re Clun

catchment

issue.

Current detailed

planning

application

13/03241/FUL.

Development

consortium.

Application likely

to be withdrawn

pending STW

treatment works

upgrade.

Known

viability

constraints

overcome by

increasing

number of

dwellings by

extending site.

Brownfield site

within settlement.

No planning issues

of principle except

overall Clun

Catchment water

quality issue – to

be resolved by

upgrade of STW

treatment works.

Current detailed

planning

application

13/03241/FUL but

likely to be

withdrawn

pending STW

treatment works

upgrade.

Development

consortium

promoting site.

Likely to be

delivered after

2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

0 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 20

Burford BUR008 2 No Green field

adj. Aspire

Centre

1.19 Flat site used

for grazing,

good

(summer)

hedge to rear.

Surrounded on

most sides by

employment

uses. Access

on bend but

reasonably

visibility,

within speed

limit.

Due to the fact

that the site

has not been

promoted

through the

SHLAA study,

but came

forward from

the last UHCS

it is

considered

likely that

although the

site is

available, it

might not be

likely to come

forward until

the second 5

year time

frame.

The land,

although

suitable and

available is

essentially

Greenfield

land and

should be

developed

after other

more suitable

Brownfield

developments

have been

investigated.

Reasonable

prospect that the

site will come

forward during the

plan period.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Due to the fact

that the site has

not been

promoted through

this study, but

came forward

from the last

UHCS it is

considered likely

that although the

site is available, it

might not be likely

to come forward

until the second 5

year time frame. •

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings.

0 20 15 35

Chirbury CHIR001

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land to rear of

Camlad

Cottages

1.38 One

landowner

(Estate) - no

legal or

physical

impediment

Yes -

sustainable

development

within

settlement.

Parish Council

support.

No

fundamental

planning

issues raised

Indicative layout

prepared by agent.

Landowner

proposing phased

development.

Straightforwar

d greenfield

site

Straightforward

sustainable

greenfield site in

single land

ownership (Estate)

with Parish

Council support.

Landowner

proposing

development in 2

phases.

20 20 10 10

Church

Stretton

CSTR016 2 No Crown

Carpets,

Burway Road

0.07 Landowner

intent unclear

Yes -

sustainable

development

within

settlement.

The site is

within town

development

boundary and

suitable for

redevelopmen

t, and could

come forward

with adjoining

site CSTR024.

The site is suitable

for redevelopment,

and could come

forward with

adjoining site

CSTR024. No

immediate interest

in development.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of a

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

The pre-

application

discussions for 12

dwellings are

agreed in principle

by the Authority.

May come

forward earlier in

the development

programme.

6 6 12

Church

Stretton

CSTR024 2 No Church

Stretton Car

Sales, Burway

Rd

0.09 Landowner

intent unclear

Yes -

sustainable

development

within

settlement.

The site is

within town

development

boundary and

suitable for

redevelopmen

t, and could

come forward

with adjoining

site CSTR024.

The site is well

located to provide

a suitable

development,

possibly in

conjunction with

adjoining site

CSTR016. No

immediate interest

in development.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Small site which

could yield 5 if

developed

sensitively for high

density town

houses or a small

terrace.

5 5

Church

Stretton

CSTR028 2 No Land at

Woodbank

House

0.38 Yes. Single

landowner.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Site outside

current town

development

boundary but

proposed to

be included in

boundary in

SAMDev Plan.

Site

surrounded by

existing

residential

development.

Site is suitable and

available. From

the information

available, it is

considered that

there is a

reasonable

prospect of

delivery in years 1-

5.

No known

viability

constraints

Site is suitable and

available. From

the information

available it is likely

that delivery on

this site will be in

the longer term.

6 6

Church

Stretton

CSTR018

(SAMDev)

4 Yes School playing

field,

Shrewsbury

Road

tbc Shropshire

Council owned

school

playingfield.

Development

dependent on

provision of

replacement

facilities

involving land

exchange (yet

to be formally

agreed). SFRA

indicates flood

constraints

likely to

reduce

capacity (34

rather than 50

dwellings).

Site

development

complexities

need to be

resolved.

Site

development

complexities

need to be

resolved.

Not likely to come

forward in Years 1-

5

Dependent on

land exchange

values, cost of

provision of

replacement

facilities and

housing yield.

Shropshire Council

owned school

playingfield –

development

dependent on

provision of

replacement

facilities involving

land exchange (yet

to be formally

agreed). SFRA

indicates flood

constraints likely

to reduce capacity

(34 rather than 50

dwellings).

Delivery shown for

years 6-10.

34 34

Church

Stretton

CSTR019

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Battlefield to

rear of Oaks

Road/Alison

Road

tbc Two

landowners -

agreement in

place

Site has

outline

planning

permission

subject to

S106

Agreement -

Committee

date 16/09/14

14/01173/OUT

. Town Council

support.

Suitable

sustainable

location.

Outline Permission

condition for

reserved matters

within 12 months.

Access to site

involves

construction

of elevated

carriageway

and avoidance

of mature

TPO'd trees

Site has outline

planning

permission subject

to S106

Agreement -

Committee date

16/09/14

14/01173/OUT.

Agreement in

place between

landowners for

access to be

provided – so site

deliverable.

26 26 52

Claverley CLAV003 2 No Land off Aston

Lane,

Claverley

tbc Likely to be an

option

agreement on

the land.

Erection of 15

affordable

dwellings.

Exception site

development.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Registered Housing

Provider is yet to

secure finance

from the HCA.

Proposal does not

form part of build

programme 2015 -

2018, however,

funding will be

sought from the

HCA as soon as it

releases it's CME

funding (Continued

Market

Engagement).

Shropshire Housing

Group are

generally realistic

with intended

housing delivery.

Scheme

viability

dependent

upon CME

funding but

the Registered

Housing

Provider is

generally

realistic about

project

delivery.

Medium sized

affordable housing

scheme promoted

by a Registered

Housing Provider

with a solid track

record of realistic

and intended

housing delivery.

15 15

General care and high

dependency care. Bedroom

only arrangements.

Reduction of 39 dwelling

equivalent from 5 year supply

(19 - 2015/16 and 20

2016/17).

Cleobury

Mortimer

CMO003 2 No Dudley

Machine Tool

Hire

0.55 Small level site

near town

centre

currently used

as machine

tool hire.

Site likely to

come forward

within the

next five years

and is subject

to a planning

application for

a 58 bedroom

bedroom care

home.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Determination of

planning

application - late

2014/ early 2015.

Start on site

2015./16.

Completion by end

of March 2017.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Care home

application on

majority of the

site.

14/00690/FUL for

58 bedroom

development.

0

Cleobury

Mortimer

CMO009 2 No Adj. Catholic

Church Lower

Street

0.28 Small but

central site in

the village and

could

accommodate

low density

growth at 8

dwellings. Not

currently

available.

Within the

settlement

boundary and

potentially

suitable for

development.

Not currently

available for

development -

forecast

delivery 2024

/25.

Site is suitable

however is not

currently available.

Site is considered

to be developable

in the longer term

planning period.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

This is a small but

central site in the

village and could

accommodate low

density growth at

8 dwellings. It is

not currently

available.

0 8 8

Cleobury

Mortimer

CMO010 2 No Land rear of

Lower Street

0.5 The site is

suitable

subject to

resolving

access

constraints.

Not clear

whether site

access

problems

could be

resolved

within the

next five

years.

Site access

issues needs

to be resolved.

Sustainable

broad

location.

From the

information

available it is also

considered that the

site is economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and sell

the housing is

good.

Taking into

account

previous

applications -

yield of

between 10-

14 would be

considered

acceptable.

Modest SHLAA site

within the

settlement

boundary, but

with problems

over access.

Delivery forecast

within the

medium term.

0 12 12

Cleobury

Mortimer

CM0014 2 No Former

Doctors

Surgery,

Cleobury

Mortimer

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Planning

application in

progress post

31st march

2014.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

The yield will

reflect the shape

of site, access

roads and need for

noise buffer.

Likely to be

delivered.

5 5

Cleobury

Mortimer

CMO005

(SAMDev)

4 Yes New House

Farm Tenbury

Road

tbc Development

subject to

access off

Tenbury Road

or via

adjoining site

off Tenbury

Road

(CMO002).

Subject to

sensitive

design,

landscape

buffering and

screening

between new

housing

development

and the

Brewery on

adjacent land

to the south,

and an

appropriate

drainage

scheme.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Planning

application

expected 2015/16

with build out

complete within

the next 5 years.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site on edge of

settlement. Single

land ownership.

No fundamental

planning issues.

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

7 7

Clun CLUN002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes B4368 east of

Clun

tbc Site in Clun

catchment

area, so waste

water

treatment

constraint

awaiting

investment by

STW - in a

current

programme

and due at

2018. Single

landowner.

No, pending

STW

treatment

works upgrade

(2018) or

possibly

publication of

nutrient

management

plan and

action

programme.

Yes - site on

edge of

sustainable

settlement.

No

fundamental

planning

concerns.

Outline application

13/03440/OUT

submitted but not

being progressed

pending STW

treatment works

upgrade

programmed for

2018.

Known

viability

constraints

overcome by

increasing

number of

dwellings by

extending site.

Greenfield site on

edge of

settlement. No

planning issues of

principle except

overall Clun

Catchment water

quality issue – to

be resolved by

upgrade of STW

treatment works.

Current outline

planning

application

13/03440/OUT

pending STW

treatment works

upgrade. Likely to

be delivered after

2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

0 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10

Clungunford CLUNG001sd 2 No Land at

Clungunford

Farm

0.66 Site located

within the

village and

consists of

Clungunford

Farm

Farmhouse

and

Clungunford

Farm Barn

residential

dwelling.

There are

several farm

related

buildings and

a small

field/grazing

paddock. No

major physical

or legal

impediments

to

development.

Site suitable

for small scale

development

of up to 5

dwellings,

subject to

sensitive

development.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Planing application

expected 2015.

Delivery of this

small scheme

forecast for

2017/18.

Scheme is

progressing

well and

addressing

sensitive

heritage

issues. No

major viabiliy

issues raised.

Site suitable for

small scale

development of

up to 5 dwellings,

subject to

sensitive

development.

5 5

Cockshutt CO002 (a + b)

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land west of

Cockshutt off

Shrewsbury

Road

tbc Straightforwar

d small

greenfield site

Updated

Highway

evidence

assessed and

found to

demonstrate

delivery.

Parish Council

support.

Suitable

location and

no significant

representation

s.

Site promoter

identified and

likely to be

delivered.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site. Updated

Highway evidence

assessed and

found to

demonstrate

delivery. Parish

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered.

5 5 10

Cockshutt CO005sd &

CO023sd

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Cockshutt

House Farm

and Land to

South of

Kenwick Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable.

Yes and

sustainable

location.

Straightforwar

d small

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning

issues

Suitable

location and

no significant

representation

s.

Site sponsor and

likely to be

delivered towards

the end of the first

5 year tranche.

Development

subject to

further

assessment of

groundwater

flooding issues

and

appropriate

drainage

design,

suitable in

principle for

five homes

across the two

sites.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

5 5

Cockshutt CO018

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at Chapel

House Farm

tbc Site

considered

deliverable.

Yes and

sustainable

location.

Straightforwar

d small

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning

issues

Suitable

location and

no significant

representation

s.

Site sponsor and

likely to be

delivered towards

the end of the first

5 year tranche.

Development

subject to

further

assessment of

groundwater

flooding issues

and

appropriate

drainage

design,

suitable in

principle for

five homes.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

5 5

Cockshutt CO004 6 No Development

Land East Of

Shrewsbury

Road

Cockshutt

Shropshire

0.86 Information

gathered for

the purposes

of this study

suggests that

there is

confidence in

the site being

available.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

The site could

offer a

suitable

location for

development

and could

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

There are no

legal or

ownership

problems

which could

limit

development

here and the

site has been

promoted by a

developer/

landowner for

the purposes

of this study.

SHLAA site

technically listed

as Long Term

Potential but with

likely to gain

planning

permission.

5 5 0

Condover CON007sd 2 No Land at Home

Farm

Condover

1.44 Currently

inactive.

Yes - as within

the settlement

area.

Yes - suitable

location, but

no clarification

on delivery.

Site is considered

to be deliverable,

although it is

currently inactive.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Low yield would

be appropriate in

this location but

still allow for a mix

of types.

12 13 25

Condover CON005

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land east of

Shrewsbury

Road, opp.

Pyepit,

Condover

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site. Parish

Council

support.

Yes - small

greenfield site

within village.

Sustainable

devlopment.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

5 5

Condover CON006

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land opposite

School, south

of The Lawns,

Condover

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site. Parish

Council

support.

Yes - small

greenfield site

within village.

Sustainable

devlopment.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Site likely

to be delivered

but indicating

Years 6-10 to

reflect Parish

Council aspiration

for phasing of

development in

the village.

5 5

Craven Arms CRAV021 2 No Temperance

Hall

0.27 Yes - no legal

or physical

impediments.

Yes - subject

to a high

quality

scheme comig

forward.

Suitable site

prime for

redevelopmen

t and has been

identified in a

number of

studies for

improvement

/redevelopme

nt.

Development of

the site has been

actively pursued by

the authorities and

has been identified

in a number of

studies for

improvement

/redevelopment.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

This site is ripe for

redevelopment

and has been

identified in a

number of studies

for improvement

/redevelopment.

4 4 4 4

Craven Arms CRAV022 2 No Abattoir Site 0.85 This site is

only likely to

come forward

once the

abattoir has

relocated.

No - as

requires the

relocation of

the abattoir.

Potentially a

suitable

location within

the settlement

boundary.

This site is only

likely to come

forward once the

abattoir has

relocated to the

proposed site off

the A49. However,

once this has

occurred the site

might become

available for

development;

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Development

capacity identifed

in planning agent's

letter of 2nd May

2013. Only part of

abattoir yard

suitable for

housing due to

extensive flood

risk across site.

Development of

existing abattoir

site liley to

comence two

years after

commencment of

construction of

new abattoir

complex to permit

company

relocation

between existing

and new abattoir

sites.

10 10

Craven Arms CRAV030sd

(SAMDev) /

2 Yes Land at

Newington

Farm

0.7 No major

physical or

legal

impediments

to

development.

Yes, subject to

suitable

scheme

safeguarding

heritage value

of existing

buildings.

Brownfield

site on edge of

settlement.

Sustainable

development -

primarily

conversion of

existing

buildings.

English

Heritage

representation

seeks heritage

assessment

regarding

farmstead

buildings on

site.

Promoted site -

detailed

submission

including indicative

layout. Owners in

negotiation with

Highways Agency

regarding A49

junction to serve

adjoining abattoir

development, with

scope to also serve

this site (but site

has separate access

in any event).

Development likely

to follow first

phase of adjoining

abattoir

development

which provides

replacement

livestock storage

and releases site

for redevelopment -

so towards end of

years 1-5.

No known

viability

constraints.

Brownfield site on

edge of

settlement. No

fundamental

issues subject to

suitable scheme

safeguarding

heritage value of

existing buildings.

Likely to be

delivered.

Development

likely to follow

first phase of

adjoining abattoir

development

which provides

replacement

livestock storage

and releases site

for redevelopment

- so towards end

of years 1-5.

5 5

Craven Arms CRAV031 2 No Former Craven

Arms

Ambulance

Station,

Craven Arms

0.23 No major

physical or

legal

impediments

to

development.

Redundant

site in need of

redevelopmen

t.

No major

issues raised

in early stages

of scheme

development

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

HCA funding

secured. Project

likely to progress

rapidly.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

Likely to be

suitable given that

site is located

within urban

boundary.

Redundant site in

need of

redevelopment.

HCA funding

secured.

7 7

Craven Arms CRAV002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Watling Street tbc Yes. South

Shropshire

Housing Group

owns site

freehold. No

highway

access

constraint at

this point on

Watling

Street.

Yes, for

affordable

housing

exceptions

scheme.

Archaelogical

assessment

required and

provided.

Visible from

AONB. Site

crossed by

Shropshire

Way to be

accommodate

d within

development.

Greenfield site

adjoining edge

of town not

suitable for

open market

development,

but suitable as

an affordable

housing

exceptions

scheme site.

Current outline

application going

to Committee in

November

14/01645/OUT. RSL

involvement - site

included in

proposed HCA

programme 2015-

20.

No known

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site

adjoining edge of

town not suitable

for open market

development, but

suitable as an

affordable housing

exceptions

scheme site.

Current outline

application going

to Committee in

November

14/01645/OUT.

RSL owns site

freehold and site

included in

proposed HCA

programme 2015-

20. Likely to be

delivered.

10 15 25

Craven Arms CRAV003 and

CRAV009

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

Greenfield

Road, Craven

Arms

tbc Surface water

flood risk

affects part of

combined site

but can be

accommodate

d through a

SUDS scheme

requiring all of

CRAV009 for

provision of

swales and

balancing

ponds for

flood storage

capacity.

Yes, subject to

widening of

Watling Street

and provision

of new

junction,

retention of

veteran trees

and flood

storage

capacity

provision.

Archaeological

assessment

required for

small scale

war-time

feature.

Supporting

information

has

demonstrated

that all issues

can be

addressed

satisfactorily.

Greenfield site

within

settlement -

sustainable

development

subject to

widening of

Watling Street

and provision

of new

junction,

retention of

veteran trees

and flood

storage

capacity

provision.

Site promoted with

indicative layout

and other

supporting

information. No

developer

involvement but

willing landowner

with track record of

releasing land for

development of

the town.

Significant

constraints but

supporting

information

site

considered

viable.

Greenfield site

within settlement -

sustainable

development

subject to

widening of

Watling Street and

provision of new

junction, retention

of veteran trees

and flood storage

capacity provision.

Site promoted

with indicative

layout and other

supporting

information. No

developer

involvement but

willing landowner

with track record

of releasing land

for development

of the town. Town

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered over

Plan period

commencing in

2017/18

25 25 25 75 25 25 25 25 20 120 20 20 40

Craven Arms CRAV004

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Watling

Street/Clun

Road, Craven

Arms

tbc Yes - no legal

or physical

impediments.

No highway

access

constraint at

this point on

Watling

Street.

Yes, subject to

an updated

archaeological

assessment

Greenfield site

on edge of

settlement.

Sustainable

development.

Known

archaeological

interest not

considered to

raise

fundamental

concerns in

view of earlier

evaluation

(1991).

No developer

involvement but

willing landowner

with track record of

releasing land for

development of

the town.

Some viability

risk from

archaeological

interest, but

earlier

evaluation

indicates no

fundamental

constraints -

potential

impact limited

to reduction in

site capacity.

Greenfield site on

edge of

settlement.

Known

archaeological

interest not

considered to

raise fundamental

concerns in view

of earlier

evaluation (1991).

No developer

involvement but

willing landowner

with track record

of releasing land

for development

of the town. Town

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered in years

6-10 (later period

indicated to reflect

relative weakness

of housing market

in the town).

20 15 35

Craven Arms CRAV010

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Roman

Downs, Craven

Arms

tbc Yes - no legal

or physical

impediments.

No highway

access

constraint at

this point on

Watling

Street.

Yes, subject to

an updated

archaeological

assessment

and advice

regarding

removal of

building spoil

currently over

the existing

archaeology.

Site on edge of

settlement -

partially

developed.

Sustainable

development.

Known

archaeological

interest not

considered to

raise

fundamental

concerns in

view of ealier

evaluation

(1991).

Willing landowner.

No developer

involvement at

present but

potential interest

from developer of

adjoining site.

Some viability

risk from

archaeological

interest, but

earlier

evaluation

indicates no

fundamental

constraints.

Site on edge of

settlement -

partially

developed. Known

archaeological

interest not

considered to

raise fundamental

concerns in view

of earlier

evaluation (1991).

Town Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

12 13 25

Craven Arms CRAV024

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off Clun

road adj.

Alexander

Park

tbc Yes - no legal

or physical

impediments.

No highway

access

constraint at

this point on

Watling

Street.

Yes, subject to

suitable

highway

access from

Clun Road

with

pedestrian

and cycle links

.

Greenfield site

within edge of

settlement.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

No developer

involvement but

willing landowner

with track record of

releasing land for

development of

the town.

No significant

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site

within edge of

settlement.

Sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Town Council

support. Likely to

be delivered in

years 11-12 (later

period indicated

to reflect relative

weakness of

housing market in

the town).

10 15 25

Ditton Priors DITT005

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Land off

Station Road

0.45 No major

physical or

legal

impediments

to

development.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Parish Council

support.

Straightforwar

d small

greenfield site

within village -

no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site No known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site in sustainable

settlement. High

likelihood of

delivery.

6 6 12

Within the settlement

boundary.

Dorrington DOR002 2 No Land at Lower

Fold

0.15 The site is a

field that

appears to be

used for

limited

grazing.

Surrounding

uses include

agricultural

land,

residential

uses and a

sewerage

works. A

newly

developed

estate of large

detached

dwellings is

located to the

north of the

site. Recent

planning

permission for

nearby site

(off Falkland

Drive). No

major physical

or legal

impediments

to

development.

Pre-

application

inquiry for 9

dwellings.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Pre application

discussions.

Site is suitable

for residential

development

at a medium

density and

has been the

subject of pre-

application

enquiries

which would

suggest the

site is

deliverable

within the

next 5 years.

Site is nearby

to Falkland

Drive approval

-

13/02776/OUT

. Feedback

from planning

consultant -

the new

footpath link

will not

compromise

the potential

of the site.

Due to the

relatively small

nature of the site

it is possible this

site could come

forward within the

next few years and

the site is already

within the

planning system

which would

suggest that the

site could come

forward within the

next 5 year time

frame. Site

suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings.

6 6

Dorrington DOR004

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off Forge

Way,

Dorrington

SABC581

tbc Preferred

access is by a

spur road off

Forge Way

through

adjoining site,

but

Development

Company

controlling this

confirms that

this access is

negotiable and

not an

impediment.

Yes -

sustainable

development

adjoining

existing

housing.

Parish Council

support.

Yes, small

greenfield site

in centre of

village

accessible via

existing access

off A49. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Developer which

promoted the site

no longer actively

pursuing site, but

Development

Company

controlling

preferred access

assures Council

that this is

negotiable,

therefore site

remains

achievable.

Negotiation of

preferred

access.

Small greenfield

site. Developer

which promoted

the site no longer

actively pursuing

site, but

Development

Company

controlling

preferred access

assures Council

that this is

negotiable,

therefore site

remains available

and achievable.

Parish Council

support.

7 8 15

Dorrington DOR017

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land adj. The

Old Vicarage

tbc No

impediments -

single land

ownership.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Parish Council

support.

Yes, small

greenfield site

close to centre

of village and

facilities.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site No known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Site likely

to be delivered

but indicating

Years 6-10 to

reflect increased

land availability in

village following

recent planning

decisions.

7 8 15

Resolved to grant. Dorrington DOR001 6 No Residential

Development

Site Land Off

Falkland Road

Dorrington

Shrewsbury

Shropshire

There are no

legal or

ownership

problems

which could

limit

development

here and the

site has been

promoted by a

developer/

landowner for

the purposes

of this study.

Yes The site could

offer a

suitable

location for

development

and could

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

Completions

forecast March

2019

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Technically a long

term potetial

SHLAA site with

planning

permission likely

in the near future.

19 19 0

Dorrington DOR014 6 No Land at Station

Road,

Dorrington

tbc There are no

legal or

ownership

problems

which could

limit

development

here and the

site has been

promoted by a

developer/

landowner for

the purposes

of this study.

Yes- the site

does have

potential to

provide a

suitable and

achievable

location.

The site could

offer a

suitable

location for

development

and could

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

Completions

forecast from

March 2016.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Technically a long

term potetial

SHLAA site with

planning

permission likely

in the near future.

12 12 24 0

Dudleston

Heath

DUDH006sd

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Ravenscroft

Haulage Site

tbc No

impediments -

single land

ownership.

Existing

consent for 9

dwellings

(10/05548/OU

T). Planning

application for

the allocated

site (29

dwellings) is

expected

shortly.

Yes - small

greenfield site

adjacent to

development

boundary and

close to village

centre.

Sustainable

devlopment.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small part

brownfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Existing

consent for 9

dwellings

(10/05548/OUT).

Likely to be

delivered since

there is active

interest and a

planning

application for the

allocated site (29

dwellings) is

expected shortly.

10 10 20

Ellesmere ELL008 2 No Station

Building and

Yard,

Brownlow

Road

tbc Yes- Impact on

listed building,

where

development

should

safeguard and

if possible

enhance the

setting,

appearance or

character of

the building.

Yes- he site is

suitable for

medium

density

development

in principle,

subject to the

retention of

the listed

building, flood

mitigation

measures,

safeguarding

of the existing

employment

use on the

remainder of

the site and

ensuring a

buffer

between

residential and

employment

uses.

Yes- from the

information

available, the

site is

considered

suitable for

housing

development.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Promoted site From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Application for 5

dwellings on part

of the site already

has permission

and development

here at medium

density is agreed

in principle.

Deliverable over

the short term.

0 0 26 26 0 52

Ellesmere ELL009 2 No Land off

Church Street

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Yes- Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings. Site

suitable over the

medium term.

7 7 14

Ellesmere ELL012 2 No Land off

Scotland

Street

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings. Suitable

over the medium

term.

7 7 14

Development capacity takes

into consideration flood zone

issues.

Ellesmere ELL003

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land south of

Ellesmere

tbc No known

impediments

Yes, subject to

satisfactory

access, layout

and design to

address

drainage and

flood risk

issues. An HRA

will be

required.

Parish Council

support.

Yes - Major

greenfield site

on edge of

town linked to

development

of adjoining

land for

leisure &

tourism use

consistent

with Town

Council views.

No

fundamental

planning

issues:

Sustainable

Development

Current outline

application

(14/04047/OUT)

No known

viability

concerns

Major greenfield

site linked to

development of

adjoining land for

leisure & tourism

use consistent

with Town Council

views. No

fundamental

planning issues

and site FRA

completed in

support of current

outline application

(14/04047/OUT).

Phased

implementation to

reflect size and

complexity of site.

20 20 40 25 25 25 25 25 125 42 43 85

Elson ELS001 2 No Land adjoining

Mayfield,

Elson,

Ellesmere

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

The site may be

suitable for

residential

development in

the medium term.

10 10 20

Gobowen GOB005 2 No Superior

Windows and

Conservatorie

s

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Given the recent

refusals for 11

dwellings for

overdevelopment,

it is suggested that

the yield be

approximately 8

dwellings at high

density, typically

comprising a mix

of terraced

dwellings, town

houses or flats.

Likely to come

forward over the

medium term.

8 8

Gobowen GOB008

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Land at

Southlands

Avenue

tbc Yes - no

impediments.

Single

landowner.

Yes, subject to

design

measures to

address

groundwater

flood risk and

impacts on

trees and

hedgerows

and

appropriate

biodiversity

surveys

Yes, small

greenfield site

close to centre

of village and

facilities. No

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections.

Parish Council

support.

Promoted site No known

viability

concerns.

Small greenfield

site, re-allocated

from Oswestry

Local Plan. No

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections. Parish

Council support.

Indicating Years 6-

10 to reflect

landowner

approach.

20 20

Gobowen GOB024 2 No Former Station

Coal Wharf

tbc Yes - no

impediments

to

development.

Yes -

affordable

housing focus.

Planning

permission -

13/04953/FUL -

granted 11th

September

2014. Site

suitable for

medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of

detached,

semi detached

and terraced

dwellings.

Wrekin HT -

developer interest.

Stong focus upon

delivery through

funding

programme.

Planning

permission granted

in September 2014.

Bid into HCA

May 2013.

Scheme

presented at

PC Sept 2013

and Public

Consultation

10th October

2013. Start on

site 2014 and

completion

Dec 2015.

Planning

permission

granted and with a

strong focus upon

delivery through

the HCA funding

stream.

Deliverable in the

short term.

0 2 10 10 0 22

Gobowen GOB012

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land between

A5 and

Shrewsbury

railway line

tbc Yes - no

impediments.

Single

landowner.

Yes, subject to

detailed

design of

appropriate

access for

vehicles and

pedestrians

and drainage

design.

Yes.

Greenfield site

of edge of

village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. Will

extend existing

Fletcher Homes

Wat’s Meadow site

(currently being

built out).

No known

viability

concerns.

Large greenfield

site extending

existing Fletcher

Homes Wat’s

Meadow site

(currently being

built out). No

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections. Parish

Council support.

Site likely to be

delivered but

indicating Years 6-

10 as

development

likely to be linked

to progress of

Wat’s Meadow.

25 25 20 20 90

Gobowen GOB020 6 No Land On North

Side Of

Whittington

Road

Gobowen

Oswestry

Shropshire

Yes - no major

impediments

to

development

identified.

Yes - although

technically a

LTP SHLAA

site, it is

perceived to

be a

sustainable

development

option.

On the edge of

a settlement.

Resolved to grant

application

13/02467/OUT in

July 2014.

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

25 25 50 0

Hanwood HAN011

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land adj. to

Cruckmeole

Farm

tbc Yes - no

impediments.

Single

landowner.

Yes, subject to

site

development

guidelines

regarding

traffic calming

measures and

phasing.

Parish Council

support.

Yes.

Greenfield site

of edge of

village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Development

subject to site

development

guidelines

regarding traffic

calming measures

and phasing.

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

10 15 25

Hanwood HAN015 6 No Development

West Of

Caradoc View

Hanwood

Shrewsbury

Shropshire

Yes - no major

impediments

to

development

identified.

Yes - although

technically a

LTP SHLAA

site, it is

perceived to

be a

sustainable

development

option.

On the edge of

a settlement.

Resolved to grant

application

13/04967/OUT in

June 2014.

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

20 20 0

Highley HIGH003 2 No Rhea Hall tbc Yes - The site

has no known

policy

restrictions or

physical

limitations

that would

limit

development.

Yes- the site is

an allocated

site within

settlement

boundaries

and is

therefore

considered

suitable.

Resolution to

grant planning

permission on

1st April 2014.

Yes- The site

offers a

suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Site has an active

developer /

promotor.

Resolution to

grant on 1st

April 2014.

Resolution to

grant planning

permission post

31st March 2014).

Strong focus upon

delivery.

21 21

Highley HIGH005 2 No St Mary's

Corner,

Woodhill Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings. Delivery

forecast over the

longer term.

8 8

Hinstock HIN012 2 No Land off Wood

Lane

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Edge of village

location means

that the site would

only be suitable

for very low

density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings.

Potential over the

medium term.

8 8

Hinstock HIN002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Hinstock

(Newport

Road)

tbc No

impediments.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Yes -

straightforwar

d small

greenfield site

on edge of

village inside

bypass

extending

existing

development.

Current planning

application

(14/00985/OUT)

for 13 dwellings

but being amended

to 6 dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site on edge of

village inside

bypass extending

existing

development.

Current planning

application

14/00985/OUT for

13 dwellings but

being amended to

6 dwellings. Likely

to be delivered.

6 6

Hinstock HIN009

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Bearcroft

tbc No

impediments.

Yes, subject to

suitable access

and A41

Bypass noise

mitigation

measures.

Yes -

greenfield site

on edge of

village inside

bypass

adjoining

existing

development -

Parish Council

support in

principle. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Current planning

application

14/02655/OUT

indicating 36

dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site on

edge of village

inside bypass and

close to facilities.

Current planning

application

14/02655/OUT

indicating 36

dwellings

18 18 36

Hodnet HOD006 2 No Barns on

Shrewsbury

Street

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Edge of village

location means

that the site would

only be suitable

for very low

density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings.5

dwellings would

be possible and

parking is

available on

Shrewsbury

Street.

0 0

Hodnet HOD007 2 No Land to the

rear of

Shrewsbury

Street

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of

detached,

semi detached

and terraced

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site within

settlement

boundary.

Delivery forecast

over the medium

term.

7 7

Hodnet HOD008 2 No Land adjacent

to County

Primary

School,

Shrewsbury

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of

detached,

semi detached

and terraced

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site within

settlement

boundary.

Delivery forecast

over the medium

term.

25 25

Kinlet KLT001sd

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Little Stocks

Close

tbc No

impediments -

part of site

now

transferred to

RSL.

Remainder

owned by

Estate.

Yes - there is a

Committee

resolution to

approve for 8

affordable

dwellings on

part of site.

and now an

outline

application for

15 dwellings

on remainder

of site.

Yes -

sustainable

location on

edge of

settlement.

No

representaion

s or objections

to SAMDev

site.

In addition to

Committee

resolution to

approve for 8

affordable

dwellings on part

of site. There is

now an outline

application for 15

dwellings on

remainder of site.

RSL involvement.

No known

viability

constraints.

Straightforward

greenfield site on

edge of

settlement. There

is a Committee

resolution to

approve for 8

affordable

dwellings on part

of site – now an

outline application

for 15 dwellings

on remainder of

site. RSL

involvement.

Likely to be

delivered.

7 8 15

Kinnerley KNY007 2 No Land at

Brookfields

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Given the small

rural character of

the village, the site

is suitable for low

density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings.

Considered

deliverable over

the medium term.

7 8 15

Kinnerley KNY002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land west of

School Road

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site.

Small

greenfield site

close to village

centre site

consistent

with Parish

Council views.

current application

for outline consent

(14/03035/OUT)

No known

viability

concerns

6 6 12

Knockin KK009 2 No The Old Post

Office

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes - subject

to design

measures to

address the

Conservation

Area, drainage

issues and

archaeological

and

biodiversity

assessments.

Parish Council

support.

Yes - small

greenfield site

adjacent to

development

boundary and

close to village

centre.

Sustainable

devlopment.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

6 6

Knockin KK001

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

Lower House

Farm

tbc Yes- no

impediments

noted.

Straightforwar

d small

greenfield site

Yes -

sustainable

SAMDev site.

No

fundamental

planning

issues and

Parish Council

support

Sustainable

location with

local support.

Site promoter

identified through

SAMDev.

Completions

forecast from

March 2017.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

7 8 15

Llanymynech LLAN001

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Former

Railway Land,

Station Road

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes - subject

to measures to

address

potential tree

and habitat

constraints,

potential

impact on the

future

restoration of

the heritage

railway and

completion of

a Habitats

Regulations

Assessment

(HRA)

Small

brownfield

site close to

village centre

site consistent

with Parish

Council views.

Actively promoted No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Site likely

to be delivered

but indicating

Years 6-10 to

reflect current

development on

adjacent land.

16 16 32

Llanymynech LLAN009

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

playing fields

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes - subject

to design

measures to

reflect the

setting of

Llanymynech

Limekilns and

Montgomery

Canal and

completion of

a Habitats

Regulations

Assessment

(HRA)

Small

greenfield site

close to village

centre site

consistent

with Parish

Council views.

Actively promoted No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

17 18 35

Ludlow LUD005 2 No 21 New Street

(NB not 20)

Site

considered

deliverable.

Yes- from the

information

available, the

site is

considered

suitable for

housing

development.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

The site has no

known policy

restrictions or

physical

limitations

that would

limit

development.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Small SHLAA site

within a strong

housing market.

The site is

considered

deliverable within

5 years.

5 5

Ludlow LUD020 2 No Lloyds of

Ludlow Corve

Street

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of

detached,

semi detached

and terraced

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site considered

deliverable over

the longer term.

17 18 35

Ludlow LUD022 2 No Morris Bufton

Galdeford

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of

detached,

semi detached

and terraced

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site considered

deliverable over

the longer term.

25 25 50

Ludlow LUD023 2 No BT Lower

Galdeford

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of

detached,

semi detached

and terraced

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site considered

deliverable over

the longer term.

15 15

Ludlow LUD037 2 No Land at

Coronation

Avenue/

Bromfield

Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term. Flooding

/ remediation

works are key

issues on this

site.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

issues need to

be resolved

regarding

flood

alleviation.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Considered a

medium term

project due to

flooding /

alleviation works.

8 9 17

Ludlow LUD041 2 No Sandpits Road tbc Site comprises

sub standard

housing which

is need of

demolition

and

replacement.

Site currently

owned and

managed by

Shropshire

Housing Group

and lies

adjacent to

existing social

housing stock.

Currently

working

through a

programme of

non-renewal

of tenancy

agreements.

Technically

yes, although

delivery will

depend upon

the relocation

of tenants.

Sustainable

location with

the built up

area of the

settlement.

Planning

application

expected to be

submitted early

2015.

Replacement of

existing sub

standard housing,

therefore no

problem with

principle.

HCA funding

agreed. 2018

build

programme.

Scheme will

need to be

completed

and grant

claimed by

2018.

Yield is reflective

of 24 units to be

demolished and

34 units to be built

(10 net).

10 10 0 0

Ludlow LUD042 2 No Harvest

House,

Portcullis

Lane, Ludlow

tbc Provision of 12

apartments.

Extension to

existing social

housing

provision.

Planning

application to

be submitted

early 2015.

Likely to be

acceptable

form of

development.

Within urban

boundary and

an extension

to existing

social housing

provision.

No major

issues raised

Planning

application to be

submitted early

2015. Completions

forecast March

2017.

Included in

HCA bid.

Planning

application to be

submitted early

2015. Likely to be

acceptable form of

development.

Within urban

boundary and an

extension to

existing social

housing provision.

12 12

Ludlow LUD017sd

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at Rocks

Green

tbc No

fundamental

impediments.

Yes -

sustainable

development

subject to site

development

guidelines,

including

contributions

to enable

future

provision of

improved

pedestrian/cyc

le links over

A49, if

required, and

to EcoPark to

the south.

Yes -

greenfield site

outside bypass

identified as

most

appropriate

from

alternatives

available -

immediately

to the south of

existing

affordable

housing

development

at Rocks

Green. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Development

Company has

option on site - in

discussion with

Coiuncil on

infrastructure

contributions and

delivery of

development.

Infrastructure

requirements

identified

from outset

linked to

allocation, so

no viability

issues.

Greenfield site

outside bypass

identified as most

appropriate from

alternatives

available. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Sustainable

development

subject to site

development

guidelines,

including

contributions to

enable future

provision of

improved

pedestrian/cycle

links over A49, if

required, and to

EcoPark to the

south.

Development

Company has

option on land and

in discussion with

Council. No

viability issues.

Likely to be

delivered,

potentially over

years 3-8.

36 40 40 114 36 36 14 86

Ludlow LUD034

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land east of

Rural

Enterprise

Centre

tbc No

impediments.

Yes, subject to

comprehensiv

e mixed use

development,

with access of

Sheet Road

and highways

improvements

, and provision

of access to

potential

future

development

area.

Yes - site close

to EcoPark to

east of Bypass

and forming

part of a

mixed use

land allocation

and providing

access to

potential

future

development

area -

sustainable

development

delivering

benefits for

town.

Development

Company has

option on site.

Current outline

planning

application

14/01012/OUT

with indicative

layout (80

dwellings) and

employment land,

with details of

access.

Infrastructure

requirements

include

undergroundi

ng of power

lines.

Greenfield site

close to EcoPark to

east of Bypass,

forming part of a

mixed use land

allocation and

providing access

to potential future

development area -

sustainable

development

delivering benefits

for town.

Development

Company has

option on site.

Current outline

planning

application

14/01012/OUT

with indicative

layout (80

dwellings) and

employment land,

with details of

access. Likely to be

delivered

20 30 30 80

Lydbury North LYD007

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land south of

Telephone

Exchange

tbc Site in Clun

catchment

area, so waste

water

treatment

constraint

awaiting

investment by

STW - in a

current

programme

and due at

2018. Single

landowner.

No, pending

STW

treatment

works upgrade

(2018) or

possibly

publication of

nutrient

management

plan and

action

programme.

Also awaiting

highway

junction

improvement

agreement.

Parish Council

support.

Site on edge of

settlement.

Visible from

AONB but no

fundamental

planning

issues apart

from Clun

catchment

water

treatment

issue.

Promoted site with

indicative layout

submitted. Likely

to be delivered

after 2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

No known

viability

concerns.

Small greenfield

site on edge of

settlement. No

planning issues of

principle except

overall Clun

Catchment water

quality issue – to

be resolved by

upgrade of STW

treatment works.

Highway junction

improvement

required. Likely to

be delivered after

2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

8 8

Lydbury North LYD008

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

Telephone

Exchange

tbc Site in Clun

catchment

area, so waste

water

treatment

constraint

awaiting

investment by

STW - in a

current

programme

and due at

2018. Single

landowner.

No, pending

STW

treatment

works upgrade

(2018) or

possibly

publication of

nutrient

management

plan and

action

programme.

Also awaiting

highway

junction

improvement

agreement.

Parish Council

support.

Site on edge of

settlement.

Visible from

AONB but no

fundamental

planning

issues apart

from Clun

catchment

water

treatment

issue.

Promoted site with

indicative layout

submitted. Likely

to be delivered

after 2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

No known

viability

concerns.

Small greenfield

site on edge of

settlement. No

planning issues of

principle except

overall Clun

Catchment water

quality issue – to

be resolved by

upgrade of STW

treatment works.

Highway junction

improvement

required. Likely to

be delivered after

2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

5 5

Lydbury North LYD009

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Former

Garage site

tbc Site in Clun

catchment

area, so waste

water

treatment

constraint

awaiting

investment by

STW - in a

current

programme

and due at

2018. Single

landowner.

Former garage

site so ground

contamination

requiring

remediation -

but small site.

Garage in

short term

storage use -

no legal

impediment.

No, pending

STW

treatment

works upgrade

(2018) or

possibly

publication of

nutrient

management

plan and

action

programme.

Parish Council

support.

Brownfield

site within

settlement

where

residential

development

suitable in

principle -

existing

dwelling on

site.

No developer

involvement at

present. Owner

intends to pursue

redevelopment

once water quality

issue resolved

(2018).

Potential

viability issue -

to be

addressed by

type of

residential

development.

Small brownfield

site within

settlement. No

planning issues of

principle except

overall Clun

Catchment water

quality issue – to

be resolved by

upgrade of STW

treatment works.

Some ground

contamination

from former use

to be remediated

and some viability

concerns – to be

addressed by type

of residential

development and

likely to be

delivered after

2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

2 2

Lydbury North LYD011

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Adjacent to

Church Close

tbc Site in Clun

catchment

area, so waste

water

treatment

constraint

awaiting

investment by

STW - in a

current

programme

and due at

2018. Single

landowner.

Highway and

culvert

improvement

required

alongside

development.

No, pending

STW

treatment

works upgrade

(2018) or

possibly

publication of

nutrient

management

plan and

action

programme.

Highway

junction and

culvert

improvements

agreement

required.

Archaeological

assessment

required and

has been

provided.

Parish Council

support.

Site within

settlement -

sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site with

indicative layout

submitted. Likely

to be delivered

after 2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

No known

viability

concerns.

Small greenfield

site within

settlement. No

planning issues of

principle except

overall Clun

Catchment water

quality issue – to

be resolved by

upgrade of STW

treatment works.

Highway and

culvert

improvement

required alongside

development but

achievable. Likely

to be delivered

after 2018 when

treatment works

programmed for

implementation.

5 5

Maesbrook MBK001

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Greenfields

Farm

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site. Parish

Council

support.

Yes - small

greenfield site

adjacent to

development

boundary and

well related to

village.

Sustainable

devlopment.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

4 4

Maesbrook MBK009

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land adj. to

The Smithy

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site. Parish

Council

support.

Yes - small

greenfield site

adjacent to

development

boundary and

well related to

village.

Sustainable

devlopment.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

5 5

Market

Drayton

MD004 2 No Haulage yard Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site suitable

for low density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of semi

detached or

detached

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

sites with delivery

forecasts ovre the

medium term.

6 6 12

Market

Drayton

MD008 2 No Land adjacent

to Kirkridge,

Shrewsbury

Road

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site suitable

for low density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of semi

detached or

detached

dwellings.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

sites with delivery

forecasts ovre the

medium term.

7 8 15

Market

Drayton

MD010 ,

MD028 and

part of MD030

(SAMDev).

2 Yes Land off

Greenfields

Lane

tbc Complex land

ownerships -

Development

Company

coordinating

delivery.

Highway

Authority

requiring

single point of

access off A53

for MD030,

MD10 and

MD28.

Yes, subject to

being co-

ordinated

devlopment

with MD030

and MD028,

with single

point of access

off A53, and

having regard

to site

development

guidelines,

including with

regard to local

ambitions for

Greenfields

recreational

facilities.

Current full

planning

application for

access off A53.

Yes -

greenfield site

on edge of

town within

A53 Bypass -

sustainable

development,

subject to

being co-

ordinated

development

with MD030

and MD028,

and having

regard to local

ambitions for

Greenfields

recreational

facilities. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Development

Company (Danbank

Developments)

involved with

promotion of

coordinated

scheme over many

years. Current

application for

access to serve the

proposed

development

submitted

(14/02630/FUL).

Infrastructure

provision

including

access from

A53, but

known as part

of site

allocation, so

no viability

concerns.

Overall

development

of Greenfields

area indicating

400 dwellings,

but if

Greenfields

recreation

facilities

relocated,

then potential

for 600

dwellings

overall.

Greenfield site on

edge of town

within A53 Bypass -

sustainable

development,

subject to being co-

ordinated

development with

MD030 and

MD028, including

single point of

access of A53 and

with regard to

local ambitions for

Greenfields

recreational

facilities. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Complex land

ownerships -

Development

Company

coordinating

delivery and high

likelihood of

delivery.

25 25 50 25 25 25 25 25 125 33 30 63

Market

Drayton

MD014 2 No Cricket Club,

Betton Road

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Sustainable site

for the medium

term. Suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings.

11 11

Market

Drayton

MD016 2 No 77 - 83

Shropshire

Street

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Yield reduced

from six to five

units as planning

permission for flat

granted in 2009.

Due to town

centre location the

site could be

suitable for high

density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of terraced

dwellings, town

houses or flats.

5 5

Market

Drayton

MD018 2 No Land off

Kilnbank Road

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA. This is a

pre-app and in the

UHCS, discussions

have previously

been around 40

dwellings and this

would be

considered as

suitable.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Suitable

development site.

May come

forward earlier in

the development

programme.

11 11 22

Market

Drayton

MD020 2 No Car Sales Area,

Salisbury Road

Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site has been

granted

permission for 5

dwellings but

awaiting S106.

5 5

Market

Drayton

MD028

(SAMDev) -

see MD010

2 Yes East of

Farcroft

Meadows

tbc Yes Yes- The site is

suitable for

medium

density

residential

development

subject to

decontaminati

on.

The site

comprises two

parts which

should be

brought

forward

together. The

site offers a

suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Site promoted

through SAMDev

The site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing is

good.

Sustainable site

suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings.

0 0 0

Market

Drayton

MD049 2 No Sycamore Way

(Fairfields)

tbc Affordable

housing

development

for 8 units.

Planning

permission

granted inJuly

2014

(14/01878/FU

L)

Suitable

development

within the

settlement

boundary.

Registered Housing

provider with

strong track record

of delivery.

HCA funding

secured and

scheme

forecast as

deliverable

within 5 years.

Small affordable

scheme with

strong potential

for deliverability.

7 7

Market

Drayton

MD030

(SAMDev) -

part -

Gladman

Developments

4 Yes Land off Rush

Lane Market

Drayton

tbc Single land

ownership.

Highways

Authority

requiring

single access

off A53 for

MD030, MD10

and MD28.

Yes, subject to

being co-

ordinated

devlopment

with MD010

and MD028,

with single

point of access

off A53, and

having regard

to site

development

guidelines,

including with

regard to local

ambitions for

Greenfields

recreational

facilities.

Current

planning

application.

Yes -

greenfield site

on edge of

town within

A53 Bypass -

sustainable

development,

subject to

being co-

ordinated

development

with MD010

and MD028,

and having

regard to local

ambitions for

Greenfields

recreational

facilities. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Current outline

planning

application by

Gladman

Developments -

14/01982/OUT for

mixed residential

for up to 162

dwellings.

Infrastructure

provision

including

access from

A53, but

known as part

of site

allocation, so

no viability

concerns.Curr

ent application

for access to

serve the

proposed

development

submitted

(14/02630/FU

L). Overall

development

of Greenfields

area indicating

400 dwellings,

but if

Greenfields

recreation

facilities

relocated,

then potential

for 600

dwellings

overall.

Greenfield site on

edge of town

within A53 Bypass -

sustainable

development,

subject to being co-

ordinated

development with

MD010 and

MD028, including

single point of

access of A53 and

with regard to

local ambitions for

Greenfields

recreational

facilities. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Current outline

planning

application by

Gladman

Developments (up

to 162 dwellings).

High likelihood of

delivery.

25 25 25 75 28 28 31 87

Minsterley MIN007

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Callow Lane

1.93 Large

Greenfield

site, outside

but adjacent

to the

settlement

boundary.Phas

ed approach

to

development.

Application

submitted

September

2014 for 56

dwellings,

comprising 29

open market

and 27

affordable

dwellings.

The site

proposed to

be allocated

for

development

are considered

deliverable

and no further

or

alternative

site allocations

are therefore

required.

Shropshire Homes

application

(14/04165/FUL)

submitted

September 2014

for 56 dwellings,

comprising 29

open market and

27 affordable

dwellings.

Affordable

dwellings form

part of HCA

funding

programme

2015 - 2018.

Unlikely that

the 27

affordable

dwellings will

be developed

in isolation to

the open

market

dwellings. As

part of the

funding

agreement

with the HCA

the affordable

dwellings will

need to be

completed

and grant

claimed by

2018.

Greenfield site

with some

constraints

potentially

affecting number

of dwellings but

no fundamental

planning issues.

Shropshire Homes

current

application for 56

dwellings

(14/04165/FUL)

and site included

in HCA funding

programme for

2012-2015 (27

affordables).

Likely to be

delivered. HCA

funding now

secured.

16 20 20 56

Minsterley MIN002 and

MIN015

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at Hall

Farm

tbc Single

landowner for

MIN002 and

MIN015.

Listed building

consent

potentially

required for

farm

buildings.

Yes. Parish

Council

support

support

redevelopmen

t of farm

buildings.

English

Heritage

seeking to

ensure

protection of

heritage

interest of

existing

buildings

(potentiallly

curtilage

listed) and

setting of

nearby listed

building.

Farm buildings

within

development

boundary of

sustainable

settlement.

Greenfield

land outside

but adjoining

boundary,

with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site

(mixed use) - no

current developer

involvement.

Potential high

cost of

appropriate

conversion

and buildings

clearance.

Site linked with

MIN015. MIN002

incorporates

existing farm

buildings, which

are within village

development

boundary. Some

constraints to

delivery –

protection of

heritage value -

but

redevelopment of

site considered

achievable.

17 17

Morda MORDOO6 +

MORD007

6 No Residential

Development

Land East Of

Kingfisher

Way

Morda

Shropshire

tbc Yes - no major

impediments

to

development

identified.

Yes - although

technically a

LTP SHLAA

site, it is

perceived to

be a

sustainable

development

option.

Resolved to

grant

13/01393/OUT

in June 2014

On the edge of

a settlement.

Resolved to grant

13/01393/OUT in

June 2014

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

23 23 23 69 0

Much Wenlock MW004 2 No Storage yard,

Station Road

Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Employment uses

will need to be

retained as part of

a mixed use

development. Part

of the site could

be subject to a

medium density

mixed flat and

housing

development.

5 5

Much Wenlock MW010 2 No Smithfield

Works

Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

The site is suitable

for development

but availability is

not confirmed. It

is therefore

thought that

development will

not come forward

until the second or

third five year

time frame.

10 10

Mytton Mill-

Forton Heath

MYT001sd

(SAMDev)

4 No Land at

Mytton Mill

No

impediments

to delivery

identified.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location.

Small

sustaianble

SAMDev site.

Site promoter

identified through

the SAMDev

process.

Completions

forecast from

March 2017.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Small sustainable

SAMDev site with

strong potential

for delivery.

5 5

Nesscliffe NESS004

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land west of

Holyhead

Road

tbc Yes - single

landowner -

no

impediments

Yes -

sustainable

development

in location

supported by

Parish Council.

Outline

planning

permission

granted,

subject to

S106

Agreement.

Greenfield site

on edge of

village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Outline planning

permission subject

to S106 Agreement

(13/04757/OUT)

considered by

Committee on 3rd

April 2014 and

confirmed on the

18th September

2014 (with

subsequent

amendment to

condition to 2

years for reserved

matters at meeting

on 16/10/14).

Indicative plan for

26 dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site. Outline

planning

permission subject

to S106

Agreement

(13/04757/OUT –

original

Committee date

03/04/14 –

confirmed

18/09/14, with

subsequent

amendment to

condition to 2

years for reserved

matters at

meeting on

16/10/14). A

planning

application has

also been

submitted for a

larger

development

including part of

the site. Likely to

be delivered.

7 8 15

Onibury ONBY003

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Onibury Farm

tbc No

impediments.

Site owned by

Onibury

Estate.

Yes, subject to

sensitive

design having

regard to

location

adjoining

conservation

area.

Yes - small site

within village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site -

indicative layout

showing site

capable of

delivering 8

dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns

(existing

modern farm

building to be

removed).

Small site within

village.

Sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Estate owned and

promoted site -

indicative layout

showing site

capable of

delivering 8

dwellings. Likely

to be delivered.

8 8

Oswestry OSW013 2 No Adj. Cricket

Ground Morda

Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site is considered

deliverable in the

medium term.

6 6

Oswestry OSW014 2 No Arthurs of

Oswestry,

Lower Brook

Street

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site is considered

deliverable in the

medium term.

12 13 25

Within the settlement

boundary.

Oswestry OSW020 2 No Land rear of

Llwyn Cottage,

Llwyn Road

Yes- there are

no legal or

ownership

problems

which could

limit

development

here.

Yes-

information

has been

gathered for

the purposes

of this study to

suggest that

there is

confidence in

the site being

suitable

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA process and

actively promoted.

Site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of a

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Modest SHLAA site

within the

settlement

boundary. Strong

delivery potential.

13 13

Oswestry OSW024 (SUE) 2 Yes Land North of

Shrewsbury

Road (SUE)

Very large

scale multiple

land

ownership

site.

Yes- In

landscape and

visual terms

this tract of

land is

considered

suitable for

accommodatin

g a significant

level of

development.

Yes- It is

considered to

represent the

optimum

location to

accommodate

a significant

level of

development

without

landscape or

visual impacts.

This would be

best achieved

via a master

planned

approach.

Developer / agent

feedback indicates

completions for

2016/17 to

2018/19.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

0 0 25 25 26 76 38 38 38 38 38 190 95 95 190

Oswestry OSW029

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Oswestry

Leisure

Centre,

College Road

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

sustainable

development

subject to site

development

guidelines

Brownfield

site with some

constraints

(existing

buildings and

ground

conditions)

but within

development

boundary, no

fundamental

planning

issues and

Town Council

support.

Active and current

RSL interest

No known

viability

concerns

Brownfield site

with some

constraints

(existing buildings

and ground

conditions) but

within

development

boundary, no

fundamental

planning issues

and Town Council

support. Private

ownership with

active and current

RSL interest. Likely

to be delivered.

18 19 37

Oswestry OSW033

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Council Depot,

Alexandra

Road

0.85 Council depot

which is now

surplus to

requirements.

Development

will require

the demolition

of single

storey

buildings and

some limited

remediation.

The Lake

Vyrnwy to

Liverpool

water supply

pipeline runs

through the

site (3.66m

Easement

each side of

the

pipeline).Thes

e are not

considered

significant

impediments

to

development.

Planning

application

expected June

2015. Pre-app

ongoing.

No

fundamental

planning

issues

1. Pre-app

discussion - public

consultation

ongoing

2. Planning

Application - June

2015

3. Start on Site -

forecast July 2015

4. First completions

- July 2016

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of a

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Brownfield site

with some

constraints

(easement for

aqueduct) but no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

with Town Council

support. Council

owned. Active and

current RSL

interest. Likely to

be delivered.

8 27 28 63

Oswestry OSW042

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Richard

Burbidge site,

Whittington

Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Brownfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

with Town Council

support. Site likely

to be delivered

but indicating later

in the Plan Period

to reflect current

occupation and

potential

complexity of site.

25 25 25 25 25 125 28 27 55

Oswestry OSW055 2 No Roy Evans

Garage, Oak

Street

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site with delivery

forecast over the

medium term.

5 5

Oswestry OSW056 2 No JT Hughes /

Guttercrest,

Victoria Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site with delivery

forecast over the

medium term.

28 27 55

Oswestry OSW057 2 No Health Centre/

Adult Training

Centre,

Victoria Rd

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site with delivery

forecast over the

medium term.

11 11 22

Oswestry OSW059 2 No Overdale,

Middleton

Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site with delivery

forecast over the

medium term.

12 12

Oswestry OSW060 2 No Garages site,

Whittington

Road

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Adjoins site

OSW042.Site

suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of detached, semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings.

7 7

Oswestry OSW066 2 No Oakfield

Middleton Rd

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Accepted SHLAA

site with delivery

forecast over the

medium term.

10 10

Oswestry OSW002

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Gobowen

Road, north of

Jasmine

Gardens

Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

36 units

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site is rejected as

outside of

settlement

development

boundary. Part of

site consulted on

as potential

Preferred Option

in SAMDev Plan.

Any development

within this area

would have a

significant impact

on the setting of

the Scheduled

Ancient

Monument and

the countryside

which adjoins it.

0 0 0

Oswestry OSW003

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Oldport Farm,

Gobowen

Road

Site

considered

deliverable in

the long term.

23 units

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Site is rejected as

outside of

settlement

development

boundary. Part of

site consulted on

as potential

Preferred Option

in SAMDev Plan.

Any development

within this area

would have a

significant impact

on the setting of

the Scheduled

Ancient

Monument and

the countryside

which adjoins it.

23 23

Oswestry OSW004

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Whittington

Road

tbc Greenfield site

with some

physical

constraints to

be addressed

as part of

layout.

Scheme

details will be

key to

deliverability

Significant

objections

raising issues

of principle.

Promoted site No known

viability

concerns

Greenfield site

subject to

comprehensive

development

guidelines, with

significant

objections to

proposed

allocations raising

issues of principle,

so not included in

first 5 years of

delivery.

23 23 23 24 24 117

Oswestry OSW030

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at The

Cottams,

Morda Road

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site.

Greenfield site

on edge of

settlement.

No

fundamental

planning

issues

Full planning

permission subject

to S106 Agreement

(13/04845/FUL).

Housebuilder has

indicated intention

to build the

development out

on receipt of

permission.

No known

viability

concerns

Greenfield site

with national

housebuilder

involvement. Full

planning

permission subject

to S106

Agreement

(13/04845/FUL –

original

Committee date

01/07/14

confirmed on

23/09/14).

Housebuilder has

indicated

intention to build

the development

out on receipt of

permission.

25 25 15 65

Oswestry OSW034

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land south of

The Cemetery

(site A)

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Greenfield site

linked with

OSW035 and 045

with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Town Council

support, but

access dependent

on land exchange

agreement with

TC so not included

in first 5 years of

delivery.

15 15 30

Oswestry OSW035

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land south of

The Cemetery

(site B)

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Greenfield site

linked with

OSW034 and 045

with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Town Council

support, but

access dependent

on land exchange

agreement with

TC so not included

in first 5 years of

delivery.

20 20 40

Oswestry OSW045

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Victoria Fields

tbc Site

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term.

Technically yes

and

sustainable

location, but

limited market

information

about

delivery.

Accepted

SHLAA site

within a

defined

settlement.

Site promoter

identified through

SHLAA.

No major

viability issues

noted to date.

Greenfield site

linked with

OSW034 and 035

with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Town Council

support, but

access dependent

on land exchange

agreement with

Town Council so

not included in

first 5 years of

delivery.

10 10

Park Hall PARK001

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Artillery/Larkh

ill/Park

Crescent

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site. Parish

Council

support.

Straightforwar

d part

brownfield

site adjacent

to

Development

Boundary with

no

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections

Promoted site No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

part brownfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

20 20

Pontesbury PBY018 and

PBY29

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at Hall

Bank,

Pontesbury.

tbc Land all

owned by

Hereford

Diocesan

Board.

Yes. Mixed

development

proposed.

Parish Council

support.

Site in

sustainable

location near

centre of

Pontesbury.

Some

constraints to

development

capacity

(topography

and flood risk)

but no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Indicative layout

submitted for 60

dwellings, with

Delivery Statement

indicating strong

developer interest.

Straightforwar

d site.

Straightforward,

largely greenfield

site in single

ownership with

Parish Council

support. Some

constraints but no

fundamental

planning issues.

Indicative layout

submitted for 60

dwellings, with

Delivery

Statement

indicating strong

developer

interest. Phasing

required in

development

guidelines.

20 25 45 15 15

Pontesbury PBY019

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land

surrounding

Mount

Pleasant

tbc Greenfield site

on edge of

village -

topographical

considerations

.

Yes, although

some

landscape

sensitivity and

need to

safeguard

neighbour

residential

amenity.

Parish Council

support.

Yes.

Sustainable

location.

Planning

application

submitted by

promoters

(14/01233/OUT).

No known

viability

constraints.

Straightforward

greenfield site on

edge of village

with Parish

Council support.

Some constraints

but no

fundamental

planning issues.

Planning

application

submitted by

promoters

(14/01233/OUT).

Likely to be

delivered.

16 16

Prees PRE002,

PRE011, and

PRE012

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land west of

Shrewsbury

Street

tbc Access off

Shrewsbury

Street subject

to demolition

of existing

dwelling

owned by

Shropshire

Housing

Group, which

has confirmed

its support.

Multiple

ownerhips but

jointly

promoted.

Therefore no

legal or

physical

impediments.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Parish Council

support.

Yes - site

centrally

located in

village -

sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site

centrally located

in village -

sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Access off

Shrewsbury Street

subject to

demolition of

existing dwelling

owned by

Shropshire

Housing Group,

which has

confirmed its

support. Multiple

ownerhips but

jointly promoted.

Therefore delivery

likely.

7 8 15

Prees PRE008

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Moreton

Street

tbc Development

dependent on

legal

agreement for

restoration of

Prees Hall.

Willing

landowner.

Yes - subject

to suitable

scheme

delivering

restoration of

Prees Hall and

provision of

replacement

open space.

Parish Council

support.

Greenfield

development

in centre of

village and

close to

facilities. No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site.

Willing landowner.

Scheme supported

by Viability Report.

Development

linked to

restoration of

Prees Hall.

Number of

dwellings

increased

from 30 to 40

to reflect

viability issues

raised in

independent

Viability

Report.

Greenfield

development in

centre of village

and close to

facilities. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Development

subject to suitable

scheme delivering

restoration of

Prees Hall and

provision of

replacement open

space. Parish

Council support.

Delivery spread

over years 4-6 to

reflect

complexities of

delivering

restoration of

Prees Hall.

5 15 20 20 20

Prees Heath PH004sd

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Former Cherry

Tree Hotel site

tbc Yes - no

impediments -

single

ownership.

Yes, subject to

use of existing

vehicular

access of

A41/A49.

Parish Council

support.

Primarily

brownfield

site in

proposed

Community

Cluster

located on

A41/A49.

Promoted site.

Willing landowner.

Brownfield

site but no

significant

viability issues

known.

Primarily

brownfield site in

proposed

Community

Cluster located on

A41/A49.

Development

subject to use of

existing vehicular

access of A41/A49.

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered, but

indicated in years

6-10 to reflect site

location and likely

market.

5 5

Shawbury SHAW004 4 Yes Land to the

rear of

Brickyard

Farm, Poynton

Road

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes - subject

to measures to

address noise

from RAF

Shawbury

Greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning

issues and

Parish Council

support.

Actively promoted:

current outline

application

(14/03635/OUT)

for 50 dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns

Greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues

and Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered:

current outline

application

(14/03635/OUT)

for 50 dwellings.

25 25 50

Shifnal SHI001 2 No St Peter's

Youth Club,

Bridgnorth

Road

tbc Possible

licence

agreement in

place.

Requires

further

clarification

about current

use.

Further

clarification

required

regarding

current use.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

The site has been

promoted through

the SHLAA process.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix of

semi detached or

detached

dwellings.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Technically

suitable SHLAA

site but perceived

to be deliverable

in the medium

term.

6 6 12

Shifnal SHI003 2 No Land at

Wolverhampt

on Road

tbc Close

relationship to

recently built-

out scheme.

No major

issues.

Application

currently

being worked

up for a Taylor

Wimpey

development.

Site is situated

within the

new Thomas

Beddoes court

development.

Suitable

location within

the new

settlement

boundary.

Scheme

masterplan has

been developed for

Taylor Wimpey and

an application is

expcted very

shortly. The

scheme will deliver

a mix of properties,

including two and

three-bedroom

properties, five of

which will be made

available for

shared ownership

and rented

housing.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Land (formerly

safeguarded for a

potential medical

centre) at Thomas

Beddoes Court (42

dwellings). Close

association with

existing

development.

21 21 42

Shifnal SHI012 2 No Jaspers,

Shrewsbury

Road

tbc Active

business use.

The site has

been subject

to a number of

schemes for

development

indicating that

there is

interest in

developing

this site.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Development

perceived

deliverable in the

medium term. The

site is suitable for

conversion or

redevelopment for

residential

apartments or part

of a mixed –use

scheme.

Will require a

full viability

analysis.

Acceptable SHLAA

site within the

settlement

boundary but

considered

deliverable in the

medium term.

5 5

Shifnal SHI013 2 No Rear of 43

Broadway

tbc Sloping land

and within the

flood zone.

Poor access.

A number of

site issues

(access and

flood

mitigation)

need to be

resolved

before the

Council

woulkd be

prepared to

grant planning

permission.

The site is

located within

the settlement

boundary in a

sustainable

location.

Site suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix of

semi detached and

terraced dwellings.

Scheme

viability may

be impacted

by flood

alleviation and

access works.

Tectnically

suitable SHLAA

site but flood

alleviation and

access work push

delivery into the

second 5 year

tranche.

11

Assumed high dependency

care home. Currently

forecast for 2nd five year

tranche. Removal of 40

dwelling equivalent from

years 2021/22 and 2023/24.

Shifnal SHI004b

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land between

Lawton Road

and Stanton

Road

tbc No

impediments.

Yes - outline

permission

granted

subject to

suitable

highways and

transport

mitigation

measures.

Yes -

sustainable

development

subject to

suitable

highways and

transport

mitigation

measures.

Outline planning

permission, subject

to s.106

(13/05136/OUT) in

August 2014 - 100

dwellings + 60 bed

care home.

No known

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site on

edge of the town.

Outline planning

permission

granted

13/05136/OUT -

100 dwellings +

care home.

Delivery likely –

indicating over

years 4-7 as

adjoining site

SHI004a already

has full consent

and is under

construction.

25 25 50 25 25 50

OK Shifnal SHI006

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land north of

Wolverhampt

on Road

tbc No

impediments.

Yes - outline

permission

granted

subject to

suitable

highways and

transport

mitigation

measures.

Yes -

sustainable

development

subject to

suitable

highways and

transport

mitigation

measures.

Outline planning

permission for 250

dwellings

(14/00062/OUT)

secured by Taylor

Wimpey (27th May

2014).

No known

viability

concerns.

Sustainable

development

subject to suitable

highways and

transport

mitigation

measures. Outline

planning

permission for 250

dwellings

(14/00062/OUT)

secured by Taylor

Wimpey. Likely to

be delivered –

potentially over

years 3 – 9.

38 38 38 114 27 27 27 27 28 136

Self contained units -no

change.

Shifnal SHI002 (care

home)

6 No The Uplands,

Shifnal

tbc Listed building

conversion to

a care home -

now with full

planning

permission

(September

2014). No

major issues

identified.

Permission

granted -

13/04842/LBC

| Conversion

and extension

of 'The

Uplands' to

form an 'Extra

Care' care

home

comprising 29

no. self

contained

apartments

with

communal

facilities

affecting a

Grade II Listed

Building

Sustainable

location and re-

use of a

building.

Completions

forecast for

2015/16.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Sustainable re-use

of an exisiting

building in a

suitable location.

Now with full

planning

permission.

14 15 29 0

OK Shifnal SHI002 (66

dwelling

development)

6 No Land off

Wolverhampt

on Road / The

Uplands

tbc Mixed

residential

development

of 66

dwellings and

garages. No

major

impediments

noted.

Application

13/04840/FUL

fully approved

with s.106 in

October 2014.

On the edge of

a settlement.

Completions

forecast - 2016/17

and 2017/18.

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

33 33 66 0

Shrewsbury SHREW002,

SHREW035,

SHREW083

and

SHREW128

(Shrewsbury

West SUE)

2 Yes Shrewsbury

West SUE

tbc Yes, although

major

development

requiring

complex S106

Agreements

and

involvement

of a number of

landowners,

the primary

landowners

are working

collaboratively

to deliver the

development.

Highways

Authority has

accepted

principle of up

to 400

dwellings

accessed off

Welshpool

Road prior to

construction

of new Link

Road, so no

legal or

physical

impediment to

first phases of

development.

Yes, for

development

in accordance

with adopted

masterplan to

include 750

dwellings and

the provision

of new Oxon

Link Road and

other

infrastructure.

Primarily

greenfield

development

on western

edge of

Shrewsbury.

Sustainable

development.

Principle of

development

established in

Core Strategy.

Comprehensiv

e

development

in accordance

with adopted

masterplan to

include 750

dwellings and

the provision

of new Oxon

Link Road and

other

infrastructure.

Phase 1 outline

application (only

landscaping

reserved) for 296

dwellings approved

by Committee

subject to signing

of S106 Agreement

on 16/10/14

(14/00246/OUT),

with national

housebuilder

involvement.

Infrastructure costs

and contributions

agreed, with main

landowners

(including

Shropshire Council)

working

collaboratively

towards delivery.

Phase 1 build out

over years 2-7,

with Phase 2

following on (same

developer) but

other phases to be

marketed and

developed

separately. LEP

grant offer towards

elements of

highways costs,

subject to detailed

business case

approval.

Major

infrastructure

requirements,

including

provision of

new Oxon Link

Road, but land

identified in

Core Strategy

on this basis

and costs to

be reflected in

land values so

no viability

issues.

Principle of

development

established in

Core Strategy.

Comprehensive

development in

accordance with

adopted

masterplan to

include 750

dwellings and the

provision of new

Oxon Link Road

and other

infrastructure.

Phase 1 outline

application (only

landscaping

reserved) for 296

dwellings

approved by

Committee

subject to signing

of S106

Agreement on

16/10/14, with

national

housebuilder

involvement.

Infrastructure

costs and

contributions

agreed, with main

landowners

(including

Shropshire

Council) working

20 40 78 98 236 113 108 78 69 38 406 51 51 102

Self contained units -no

change.

Shrewsbury SHREW035(Ho

lyhead Rd,

Care Home)

2 Holyhead

Road, Bicton

tbc 85 unit care

home - no

major

impediments

to

development.

Yes -

development

could come

forward

independent

of wider

masterplan

area.

Yes - not

included in

original

masterplan

work, but a

suitable use

for this part of

the overall

planned area.

Pre-app 14/00501.

Application

expected early

2015. Completions

forecast 2017/18.

It is

understood

that HCA

funding has

been secured.

85 unit care home

development

within a

sustainable

location and with

funding

progressed to

secure delivery.

42 43 85

Shrewsbury SHREW003 2 No The Hollies,

Sutton Road

tbc Yes- Although

a number of

mature trees

exist on site.

Desirable to

maintain

existing

building as

part of

redevelopmen

t proposals.

Further work

required on

landscape

impact

From the

information

available, the

site is

considered

suitable for

housing

development.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

The site has been

actively promoted

through the SHLAA

process. Site

suitable for high

density

development

typically

comprising a mix of

terraced dwellings,

town houses or

flats.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Acceptable SHLAA

site within the

settlement

boundary but

considered

deliverable in the

medium term.

18 18

Shrewsbury SHREW007 2 No Land at the

Elms,

Belvidere

tbc Yes- although

there are

mature trees

in grounds.

Further work

required on

landscape

impact

From the

information

available, the

site is

considered

suitable for

housing

development.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

The site has been

actively promoted

through the SHLAA

process. Site

suitable for high

density

development

typically

comprising a mix of

terraced dwellings,

town houses or

flats.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Acceptable SHLAA

site within the

settlement

boundary but

considered

deliverable in the

medium term.

15 15

Shrewsbury SHREW008 2 No Richmond

House,

Harlescott

tbc Yes - no

impediments.

No major

issues

identified.

From the

information

available, the

site is

considered

suitable for

housing

development.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

The site has been

actively promoted

through the SHLAA

process. Site

suitable for high

density

development

typically

comprising a mix of

terraced dwellings,

town houses or

flats.

From the

information

available it is

also

considered

that the site is

economically

viable and the

capacity of the

developer to

complete and

sell the

housing in this

area is good.

Acceptable SHLAA

site within the

settlement

boundary but

considered

deliverable in the

medium term.

16 16

See below for figures. Shrewsbury SHREW009

(See

SHREW189 for

dwellings)

2 No Radbrook

College

Complex

1.51 Council will

have vacant

possesion of

all buildings

on its land by

30th August

2015. Access

linked to

redevelopmen

t of

SHREW189

(College

buildings

already

vacant), but

the

landowners

are working

together and

the

development

of the two

sites is being

jointly

planned.

Yes, subject to

appropriate

safeguarding

of greenspace

and single

point of access

with

SHREW189.

Yes -

brownfield

site within

town

development

boundary.

Greenspace

within site.

Site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings.

Outline application

expected in

November 2014

alongside

application for

SHREW189,

following pre-

application

consultations

carried out in

September 2014,

then site marketing

in Spring 2015 and

land sale, leading

to reserved

matters in Autumn

2015,

commencement in

Spring 2016 and

first completions in

2016/17.

Combined sites

illustrative

masterplan

indicates 125

dwellings and 22

apartments.

No known

viability

concerns, but

linked to

progress of

SHREW189.

Outline

application

expected in Nov

2014 alongside

application for

SHREW189. High

likelihood of

delivery. Figures

included in

SHREW189 listing.

0 0

Info noted at examination. Shrewsbury SHREW189

(including

dwellings on

SHREW009)

2 No Radbrook

College

Complex

4.81 College site

vacant

(September

2014)

following

transfer of

operations to

London Road.

Yes, subject to

retention of

existing main

college

building and

appropriate

safeguarding

of greenspace.

Yes -

brownfield

site within

town

development

boundary.

Greenspace

within site.

Site suitable

for medium

density

development

typically

comprising a

mix of semi

detached and

terraced

dwellings and

conversion of

College

building to

apartments.

Outline application

expected in

November 2014

alongside

application for

SHREW189,

following pre-

application

consultations

carried out, then

site marketing in

Spring 2015 and

land sale, leading

to reserved

matters in Autumn

2015,

commencement in

Spring 2016 and

first completions in

2016/17.

Combined sites

illustrative

masterplan

indicates 125

dwellings and 22

apartments

Retention of

College

building and

greenspace,

but no viability

concerns.

Site suitable for

medium density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

and terraced

dwellings and

possibly some flats

as part of a mixed

use scheme. This

has been adjusted

from the previous

SHLAA to a more

realistic figure to

take into account

the scale and

character between

the College and

Sparkham Close.

Combined sites

(including

SHREW009)

illustrative

masterplan

indicates 125

dwellings and 22

apartments

20 38 38 96 38 13 51

Shrewsbury SHREW010 2 No Shrewsbury

Training and

Development

Centre

tbc Yes - although

impact on

adjacent listed

building will

need to be

carefully

managed.

Yes -

brownfield

site within the

settlement

boundary.

The site is

suitable for a

medium / high

density

residential

scheme,

considering

the impact

upon the

adjacent listed

building. The

site offers a

suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Site considered

deliverable by end

of March 2019. The

site is suitable for a

medium / high

density residential

scheme,

Heritage

mitigation

measures may

impact on site

layout /

density. Not

considered

significant.

Acceptable SHLAA

site which is

considered

deliverable within

the first 5 years.

16 16

Shrewsbury SHREW024 2 No Land off

Underdale

Road

tbc Yes - no

impediments.

SHLAA

acceptable site

located within

the

development

boundary of

the

settlement.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

SHLAA site

sponser.

No major

viability issues

raised.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwelling and

should be

delivered within 5

years.

5 5

Shrewsbury SHREW028,

SHREW029,

SHREW075,

SHREW107,

SHREW114,

and

SHREW127

(Shrewsbury

South SUE)

2 Yes Shrewsbury

South SUE

tbc Yes, although

major

development

requiring

complex S106

Agreements

and

involvement

of a number of

landowners,

there has been

a consortium

approach to

the promotion

of the SUE,

with the

primary

landowners

working

collaboratively

to deliver the

development.

Infrastructure

costs and

contributions

identified and

apportioned.

No legal or

physical

impediments

to

development.

Yes, for

development

in accordance

with adopted

masterplan to

include

approximately

950 dwellings,

subject to

appropriate

infrastructure

contributions.

Primarily

greenfield

development

on southern

edge of

Shrewsbury.

Sustainable

development.

Principle of

development

established in

Core Strategy.

Comprehensiv

e

development

in accordance

with adopted

masterplan to

include 950

dwellings and

the provision

of appropriate

infrastructure

contributions

and land.

Phase 1 of

residential

development (291

dwellings) granted

full planning

consent and under

construction -

Taylor Wimpey

(13/00893/FUL).

Outline application

submitted for

majority of

remainder of

residential

development - up

to 550 dwellings -

(and strategic

employment site)

by Lands

Improvement

Holdings

(14/04428/OUT),

leaving one further

residential phase

for approximately

100 dwellings to

come forward.

Major

infrastructure

requirements

but land

identified in

Core Strategy

on this basis

and costs to

be reflected in

land values so

no viability

issues.

Principle of

development

established in

Core Strategy.

Comprehensive

development in

accordance with

adopted

masterplan to

include

approximately 950

dwellings,

employment land

and related

infrastructure.

Phase 1 of

residential

development (291

dwellings) granted

full planning

consent and under

construction -

Taylor Wimpey

(13/00893/FUL).

Outline

application

submitted for

majority of

remainder of

residential

development - up

to 550 dwellings -

(and strategic

employment site)

by Lands

Improvement

Holdings

38 57 82 177 83 83 83 83 83 415 31 31 62

Shrewsbury SHREW031 2 No Site off

Holdgate

Drive,

Featherbed

Lane

tbc No major

impediments

to

development.

Resolved to

grant planning

permission on

29th May 2014

-

14/01147/FUL

Yes - suitable

subject to

satisfactory

access and

managing

greenspace

requirements.

Yes -

sustainable

location.

Shrewsbury is

a major

settlement

and as such

has a good

range of

facilities and

services

associated

with a town

centre of its

size.

The site has a

resolution to grant

planning

permission and

comnletions

forecast - 2016/17

and 2017/18.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Acceptable SHLAA

site which now has

a resolution to

grant planning

permission for 25

units. Deliverable.

12 13 25

Shrewsbury SHREW058 2 No Former

Driving Test

Centre, Bell

Lane

tbc Site will

require

suitable noise

abatement

measures due

to its

proximity to

the railway

line. Delivery

generally

forecast over

the longer

term.

Yes - subject

to a suitable

scheme

design, layout

and

environmental

screening.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

Delivery forecast

towards the end of

the plan period.

Site

remediation

may impact on

scheme

viability.

Small brownfield

site with

development

options over the

longer term.

6 6

Shrewsbury SHREW071 2 No Royal

Shrewsbury

Hospital North

tbc No major

impediments

to

development

now.

Yes - subject

to the

principles set

out in the

adopted

planning brief

for the site.

Suitable

sustainable

location within

settlement

There is an

adopted

development brief

for the site and this

aspect of the site is

considered

deliverable within

5 year.

No major

viability issues

raised at this

stage.

The site is suitable

for medium

density residential

development in

accordance with

the adopted

planning brief and

has been

confirmed as

available by

Secretary of State

for Health. This

aspect of the site

is considered

deliverable within

5 years.

15 15 30

Shrewsbury SHREW209 2 No Shelton

Hospital

tbc Requires a co-

ordinated

redevelopmen

t programme,

but no major

impediments

to

development.

Yes - subject

to a phased

implementatio

n plan.

Suitable

sustainable

location within

settlement.

Completions

forecast from Year

3 at a modest build

out rate until

2022/23. Yield

may be higher

depending upon

the design of

development.

No major

viability issues

raised at this

stage.

Yield may be

higher dependant

on design of

development

options which will

come forward at a

later stage as part

of a coordinated

redevelopment

scheme.

30 30 30 90 30 30 30 28 118

Treated as self contained

units - no change.

Shrewsbury SHREW073

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Off Ellesmere

Road (East)

4.33 This site

comprises

land

associated

with the

railway line

and railway

sidings which

are no longer

in use.

Surrounding

uses comprise

mainly 2

storey

terraced and

semi detached

dwellings.

Pre-app

(PREAPP/14/0

0345) for 84

two storey,

two and three

bedroom

houses, 68 one

and two

bedroom Extra

Care

(affordable)

apartments.

No major

representation

s made.

Pre-app - June /

Ju;y 2014.

Application likely

to progress quickly

and expected

before end of 2014

or early 2015. First

completions

forecast by end of

March 2016.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

Pre-app

(PREAPP/14/0034

5) for 84 two

storey, two and

three bedroom

houses, 68 one

and two bedroom

Extra Care

(affordable)

apartments.

34 34 40 44 152

Shrewsbury SHREW080 2 No Site at St

Michaels

Gate/ St

Micheals

Street

tbc Longer term

project.

Suitable

location but

considered a

longer term

project due to

the nature of

the site.

Sustainable

location within

the built up

area.

Forecast for

delivery 2024+.

Will require a

full viability

assessment,

but no major

issues raised

at this point.

Existing building

on site is suitable

for conversion and

should be

retained. Yield

reflects the

limitations of such

a conversion.

20 20

Shrewsbury SHREW081 2 No Site at Barker

Street/ St

Austins Street

tbc Forecast for

delivery over

the medium

term.

Suitable

location but

considered

deliverable in

the medium

term linked to

timelines for

SHREW081B.

Sustainable

location within

the built up

area.

Forecast for

delivery within the

2nd 5 year tranche.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Proposals are for

high density

development

which would be

appropriate here

given the town

centre location.

This would give a

total of

approximately 20

dwellings with

provision of open

space.

20 20

Shrewsbury SHREW081B 2 No Barker Street

6th Form

College

tbc Mixed use

scheme with

potential

complexities -

forecast for

delivery over

the medium

term.

Suitable

location but

complexities

linked to

mixed use

development.

Sustainable

location within

the built up

area.

Forecast for

delivery within the

2nd 5 year tranche.

Will require a

full viability

assessment,

but no major

issues raised

at this point.

Site is suitable for

residential

development as

part of a mixed

use scheme.

Delivery in the

medium term.

20 20

Shrewsbury SHREW085 2 No Land at

Silkmoor

tbc Flood risk

mitigation

issues need to

be resolved.

Not until flood

defence and

amenity space

issues have

been resolved.

Acceptable

location within

the settlement

boundary but

work required

on flood risk

mediation in

particular.

Delivery forecast in

the longer term.

Flood risk

mitigation

may impact on

scheme

viability.

Proposals are for

high density

development

which would be

suitable here

given the town

centre location.

This would equate

to 30 dwellings,

taking into

account a

reduction in

developable land

area for flood

defence and

amenity space.

15 15

Shrewsbury SHREW087 2 No Site at New

Zealand

House, Abbey

Foregate

tbc Development

forecast in the

longer term.

Flood

alleviation

issues to

resolve.

High density

development

location, with

flood

alleviation

issues to

resolve.

Requires a

considered

approach.

Sustainable

location -

within the

settlement

boundary.

Site promoted

throught the

SHLAA process.

Flood risk

mitigation

may impact on

scheme

viability.

Proposals are for

high density

development

which would be

suitable here

given the

location. This

would equate to

75 dwellings,

taking into

account a

reduction in

developable land

area for flood

defence and

amenity space.

Development

forecast in the

longer term.

75 75

Shrewsbury SHREW134 2 No Land at Old

Coleham,

Shrewsbury.

tbc Site is

perceived to

be deliverable

in the longer

term. The site

has no known

policy

restrictions or

physical

limitations

that would

limit

development.

Yes -

Sustainable

location within

settlement

boundary.

The site offers

a suitable

location for

development

and would

contribute to

the creation of

sustainable,

mixed

communities.

The site has been

promoted through

the SHLAA process.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

The site offers a

suitable location

for development

and would

contribute to the

creation of

sustainable, mixed

communities.

Delivery forecast

in the longer term.

50 50 100

Shrewsbury SHREW155 2 No Land off

Racecourse

Lane

tbc The site

comprises

open space

which is

currently used

for informal

and formal

recreation.

The site is

surrounded by

the Shelton

Hospital

(mental health

facility) and

formal

recreation

(including

former SAHA

buildings). Site

is perceived to

be deliverable

in the longer

term.

Yes -

Sustainable

location within

settlement

boundary.

The site is

suitable for

medium

density

residential

development

in accordance

with the

adopted

planning brief.

The site has been

promoted through

the SHLAA process.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

The site is suitable

for medium

density residential

development in

accordance with

the adopted

planning brief.

Delivery forecast

in the longer term.

15 15

Shrewsbury SHREW158 2 No William Farr

House, Royal

Shrewsbury

Hospital

tbc Possible

contamination

from hospital

uses.

Considered

deliverable in

the longer

term.

Yes -

Sustainable

location within

settlement

boundary.

The site is

suitable for

high density

residential

conversion.

Suitable

location within

the settlement

boundary.

The site has been

promoted by a

developer/

landowner.

The site is

suitable for

residential

development,

subject to the

policy tests for

retention of

community

facilities being

met, with

development

coming

forward in the

longer term.

The site is suitable

for residential

development, but

potentially

deliverable in the

longer term.

35 35 70

En-suite bedrooms only. 60

dwelling equivalent included

in 5 year figures - 30 2016/17

and 30 - 2017/18. Now

removed.

Shrewsbury SHREW173a 2 No TA Centre,

Sundorne

Road,

Shrewsbury

(90 bed care

home

development)

tbc Erection of a

90 bed care

home

development,

part of a wider

scheme as

detailed under

SHREW173b.

No major

issues raised

to date in

impediments

to

development.

Yes -

application

submitted

March 2014

and decision

on outline

22nd July

2014.

Suitable

location within

the settlement

boundary.

Completions

forefast for

2016/17 and

2017/18 following

the roll out of 23

residential units on

SHREW173b.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Sustainable site

within the

settlement

boundary. Strong

delivery potential.

0

Shrewsbury SHREW173b 2 No TA Centre,

Sundorne

Road,

Shrewsbury

(23 dwelling

aspect of

larger scheme)

0.65 No major

issues raised

to date.

Planning

permission

granted - 9th

October 2014

Suitable

location within

the settlement

boundary.

The Wrekin

Housing Trust are

leading on the

project. Site forms

part of HCA bid for

2015 - 2018 and

will be completed

within this time

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

Outline

permission for 19,

now looking at 23

dwellings on

detailed.

23 23

Shrewsbury SHREW192 2 No Garages, Off

Belvidere Lane

tbc On street

parking

arrangements

need to be

agreed.

Yes if parking

arrangements

are satisfield.

The site is

located within

the settlement

boundary so

technically

acceptable

although there

may be

complexities

involved in

bringing this

brownfield

site forward.

No developer

identified at

present.

Small scale

site. Former

brownfield use

could add

demolition

and

remediation

costs to the

development.

The site is suitable

for terraced

housing

development,

subject to HA

agreeing on-street

parking

arrangements.

5 5

Shrewsbury SHREW206 2 No Salop Music

Centre, St

Michaels

Street

19 19

Shrewsbury SHREW211 2 No Whitehall,

Monkmoor

Road

tbc Development

expected

within the

longer term.

The SHLAA

assessment

indicates that

the site is

within the

settlement

boundary but

delivery is

likely over the

longer term.

Site is located

within the

development

boundary.

No developer

involvement

identified.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

The site is suitable

for medium to

high density

residential

development.

Development

expected within

the longer term.

25 20 45

Shrewsbury SHREW231sd 2 Land east of

The Beacon,

Copthorne

Road

0.24 Residential

development

comprising 21

retirement

apartments.

Granted

planning

permission 4th

April 2014.

Planning

permission

approved in

April 2014 for

21 residential

units

(13/02251/FU

L)

Sustainable

location within

the settlement

boundary.

McCartney and

Stone

Development

complex, with

potentiually rapid

build programme.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

Retirement

complex

development

within a

sustainable

location /

settlement.

Delivery expected

to be fairly rapid.

21 21

Shrewsbury SHREW232sd 2 No Kwik Fit, 167 -

170 Abbey

Foregate

0.57 No major

issues raised

to date.

Planning

application -

14/01861/FUL -

now approved

subject to

s.106.

No major

representation

s raised to

date.

Full planning

permission - late

2014 / early 2015.

Reasonably quick

apartment complex

build.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

Yield assumes 52

self-contained

units.

26 26 52

Shrewsbury SHREW234sd 2 No Shrewsbury

Prison

1.14 Former Prison

well located

with the town

on elevated

land adjacent

to the river

and the

railway station

with the castle

to the south

west across

the railway

station and

lines which are

on much lower

ground.

Unclear about

delivery

programme.

The former

prison

represents an

important

complex of

historic

buildings

which are

grade 2 listed.

Potentially

complex

application in

which the

protection of

historic fabric

would need to

be fully

addressed.

Within the

settlement

boundary but

requires a

considered

approach to

development.

Not clear at this

stage.

The listed

buildings may

restrict

development

options in

some areas.

Detailed

viability

analysis

required.

Information

available indicates

a mix of

apartments,

terraced houses

and character

historic houses.

30 35 65

Shrewsbury SHREW235 2 No Former

Ambulance

Station -

Abbey

Foregate

tbc Small mixed

use

development

with no major

impediments

to

development.

Yes - resolved

to grant

planning

permission in

November

2014 -

14/03033/FUL.

Sustainable

bownfield site

within the

settlement

boundary.

Resolved to grant

planning

permission -

November 2014.

Small mixed

use scheme

with various

land and sales

values. No

major

viasbility

issues

identified.

Planning

permission now

approved subject

to s.106 for a

change of Use of

former ambulance

station to A1 retail

including the

provision of two

C3 residential

units and the

erection of

thirteen dwellings

7 8 15

Shrewsbury SHREW001

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land North of

London Road

tbc No

impediments -

land owned by

Council.

Yes. Suitable

location - site

adjoining

existing

development

on edge of

town and

within Bypass.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Council leading self

build housing

project.Indicative

layout for 48

dwellings. Funding

obtained…Outline

planning

application to be

submitted…

Viability of

individual

units will

depend upon

build method.

Straightforward

greenfield site

owned by

Shropshire

Council. Self Build

housing scheme

being actively

progressed.

Extended delivery

period to reflect

gradual

development

through self-build.

2 4 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 15 12 12 24

Shrewsbury SHREW016

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land at

Hillside Drive

tbc Yes - no

impediments

Yes, subject to

retention of

protected

trees,

provision of

public open

space/woodla

nd ecology

area and

enhancement

of footpath

access to

Severn Way -

sustainable

development.

Town Council

support.

Small

greenfield site

adjoining

existing

development.

Sustainable

development

with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Galliers

Homes/Cameron

Homes has advised

of intention to

submit detailed

application autumn

2014,

commencement

spring 2015, build

out over 2 years.

No known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

small greenfield

site with

developer

involvement.

Galliers

Homes/Cameron

Homes has

advised of

intention to

submit detailed

application

autumn 2014,

commencement

spring 2015, build

out over 2 years.

High likelihood of

delivery.

10 10 20

Self-contained apartment

developments - not detailed

within the first 5 years.

Shrewsbury SHREW022 4 Yes Westside tbc Yes - no

impediments.

Yes -

sustainable

development

in the context

of adjoining

Shrewsbury

West SUE.

Straightforwar

d greenfield

site, to be

adjacent to

Shrewsbury

West SUE

Phase 1

housing

development

and with two

existing

dwellings on

site.

Committee

resolved to grant

outline planning

consent, subject to

signing S106

Agreement on

18/09/14

(14/02749/OUT).

Indicative layout

for 5 dwellings and

two retirement

blocks for 21

apartments and

retention of two

existing dwellings.

No known

viability

concerns, but

proposal for

retirement

apartments to

be firmed up.

Straightforward

greenfield site, to

be adjacent to

Shrewsbury West

SUE Phase 1

housing

development.

Committee

resolved to grant

outline planning

consent, subject to

signing S106

Agreement on

18/09/14

(14/02749/OUT).

Indicative layout

for 5 dwellings

and two

retirement blocks

for 21 apartments

and retention of

two existing

dwellings. Some

development

likely to be

delivered, but

proposal for

retirement

apartments needs

to be firmed up, so

indicated for years

6-10.

5 5 21 21

Shrewsbury SHREW027

(SAMDev)

4 Yes Land off

Preston Street

and East of

London Road

tbc Land owned

by Taylor

Wimpey and

Persimmon

Homes. At

least 150

dwellings can

be served off

Preston Street

subject only to

improvements

to Preston

Street.

Remainder is

dependent on

agrement of

acces from

London Road.

Developers

have an

agreement for

an access over

land owned by

Shropshjire

Council, but

preferred

access is over

land owned by

Shrewsbury

College.

Yes, subject to

satisfaction of

comprehensiv

e

development

guidelines for

site, including

access

improvements

/provision.

Suitable

location on

edge of town -

sustainable

development

with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

National

housebuilders

Taylor Wimpey and

Persimmon Homes

own the site.

Information

provided that

intend to submit

planning

application in

2014/15….

Key issue is

need for

access to serve

the majority of

site off London

Road.

Developers

have an

agreement in

place with

Shropshire

Council for

one route, but

preferred

route requires

agreement of

Shrewsbury

College.

Feasibility

plans

prepared and

discussions

held.

Major greenfield

site for

coordinated

development in

two linked parts,

with a maximum

of 150 dwellings

off Preston Street

and 400-450 to

accessed off

London Road,

subject to

agreement of

access. Two

national house-

builders own the

site. High

likelihood of

delivery over the

Plan period –

limited delivery

counted for years

1-5 to reflect

primarily the area

which can come

forward without

new access off

London. Road

38 57 57 57 209 57 57 57 57 57 285 33 23 66

Shrewsbury SHREW095 4 Yes Land West of

Battlefield

Road

tbc Greenfield site

within built up

area –

sustainable

development.

Part of mixed

use allocation

subject to

some

constraints

including flood

risk and

existing

industry on

southern edge

and railway to

west, but no

fundamental

planning

issues to

prevent

delivery of

housing on

site.

Yes - if the

complexities

of the scheme

were

overcome.

Sustainable

location within

the built up

area.

Delivery indicated

for years 6-10 to

reflect potential

complexities of

mixed use

development,

although land at

Battlefield Garage

(SHREW115) could

come forward

independently in

years 1-5

Will require a

full viability

assessment,

but no major

issues raised

at this point.

Greenfield site

within built up

area – sustainable

development. Part

of mixed use

allocation subject

to some

constraints

including flood risk

and existing

industry on

southern edge and

railway to west,

but no

fundamental

planning issues to

prevent delivery

of housing on site.

Delivery indicated

for years 6-10 to

reflect potential

complexities of

mixed use

development,

although land at

Battlefield Garage

(SHREW115) could

come forward

independently in

years 1-5.

0 0 0 20 20 25 25 90

Shrewsbury SHREW115 4 Yes Land at

Battlefield

Garage,

Shrewsbury.

tbc The site is

situated in an

area with a

strong housing

market, and

there are no

known

ownership

problems or

issues.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Sustainable

location -

Access to the

site can be

achieved and

public

transport

infrastructure

incorporated

to increase the

sustainability

of any

development.

The development

has a site sponsor.

Completions

forecast towards

the end of the first

five year tranche.

No major

viability issues

raised to date.

The site is situated

in an area with a

strong housing

market, and there

are no known

ownership

problems or

issues. It is

assumed that the

land is

uncontaminated

due to its

longstanding

agricultural use.

Access to the site

can be achieved

and public

transport

infrastructure

incorporated to

increase the

sustainability of

any development.

10 10

Shrewsbury SHREW212 4 Yes Land off

Longden Road

and

Mousecroft

Lane

6.80 Large

greenfield site -

no major

impediments

to

development

identified.

Developer

involvement –

Wyro Homes

has secured

outline

planning

permission

subject to

S106 approval

(originally

03/04/14

Committee

and confirmed

18/09/14) for

up to 175

dwellings. No

unresolved

S106

Agreement

issues.

Committee

has resolved

to grant.

Wyro Homes has

secured outline

planning

permission subject

to S106 approval.

No major

viability issues

raised by the

applicant.

Large greenfield

site. Developer

involvement –

Wyro Homes has

secured outline

planning

permission subject

to S106 approval

(originally

03/04/14

Committee and

confirmed

18/09/14) for up

to 175 dwellings.

No unresolved

S106 Agreement

issues. Reserved

matters

application being

prepared –

condition requires

within 12 months.

High likelihood of

delivery.

38 38 38 38 152 23

Shrewsbury SHREW210,

SHREW030,

SHREW094,

and

SHREW019

(SAMDev)

4 Bowbrook-

Radbrook

Yes - no

impediments.

Yes -

sustainable

development

in line with

site

development

guidelines

including

provision of

countryside

park, land for

community

facilities and

link road

through

development

area. Planning

permissions

granted

Yes - major

greenfield site

on edge of

existing built-

up area.

Sustainable

devlopment

subject to

coordinated

devlopment in

line with

comprehensiv

e guidelines

and indicative

masterplan.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Planning

permissions

granted for whole

area in two parts,

with S106

Agreements

signed. Barratt

Homes

constructing 118

dwellings on land

off Hanwood Road

(permission

13/03285/FUL),

Bovis and Barratt

Homes to construct

425 dwellings on

land at Bowbrook,

off Mytton Oak

Road (permission

13/03534/OUT and

current application

for reserved

matters

14/03844/REM).

Construction to

commence in 2015,

with build out at 60-

70 p.a. in a full

year, potentially

rising.

Infrastructure

and land

requirements

all identified

as part of site

allocation

process, so no

viability

issues.

Planning

permissions

granted for whole

area in two parts,

with S106

Agreements

signed. Barratt

Homes

constructing 118

dwellings on land

off Hanwood Road

(permission

13/03285/FUL),

Bovis and Barratt

Homes to

construct 425

dwellings on land

at Bowbrook, off

Mytton Oak Road

(permission

13/03534/OUT

and current

application for

reserved matters

14/03844/REM).

Construction to

commence in

2015, with build

out at 60-70 p.a. in

a full year,

potentially rising.

0 0 0

Shrewsbury SHREW090 6 No Land Opposite

Ellesmere

Drive

Ellesmere

Road

Shrewsbury

Shropshire

4.14 No major

impediments

to

development.

Planning

application

13/05124/FUL -

resolved to

grant on 26th

June 2014 for

75 dwellings

On the edge of

a settlement.

Completions

forecast - 2017/18

and 2018/19.

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

38 37 75 0

St Martins STM006 2 No Darjeeling,

School Lane

tbc Considered a

longer term

project.

No

fundamental

planning

issues and

classified as a

SHLAA

accepted site.

Within the

settlement

boundary of

St. Martins.

Historically

promoted as part

of the SHLAA

process.

Viability issues

have not been

reviewed in

detail.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings.

12 12

St Martins STM007 2 No Ifton Miners

Welfare

Institute

tbc Considered a

longer term

project.

Issues

outstanding

regarding the

protection of

local heritage

/ culture.

Within the

settlement

boundary of

St. Martins.

Historically

promoted as part

of the SHLAA

process.

Viability issues

have not been

reviewed in

detail.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings.

8 8

St Martins STM029 4 Yes Land at Rhos-y-

llan Farm

tbc Large site

allocated for

mixed uses,

comprising

housing and

employment

uses; land for

community

recreation and

sports pitches.

No

fundamental

legal or

physical

impediments.

No

fundamental

planning

issues and

Parish Council

support.

No significant

outstanding

objections.

Promoted site. Housing forms

part of a

mixed use

development

with various

land and

forecast sales

values.

Overall

scheme

considered

viable.

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

25 25 50 20 10 30

Stoke Heath STOK003

sth002

4 Yes Land at The

Club Dutton

Close

tbc No

impediments.

Yes - part

brownfield

site adjacent

to existing

residential

area with

existing access

off Dutton

Close.

Straightforwar

d part

brownfield

site with no

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support.

Promoted site. Cost of

demolition of

former social

club building

but no known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

part brownfield

site with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered but

indicated for years

1-6 as landowner

promotion with no

current developer

involvement.

12 13 25

Tetchill TET001 4 Yes Land South of

Cairndale

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

straightforwar

d site.

Greenfield site

on edge of

settlement.

No

fundamental

planning

issues

Planning

permission for 10

dwellings

(14/02437/FUL),

with subsequent re-

application

(14/02611/FUL) to

apply reduced

affordable housing

requirement.

Viability to be

improved by

reduced

affordable

housing

contribution.

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues.

Parish Council

support. Planning

permission for 10

dwellings

(14/02437/FUL),

with subsequent

re-application

(14/02611/FUL) to

apply reduced

affordable housing

requirement.

Likely to be

delivered.

5 5 10

Tilstock TIL002 4 Yes North of Christ

Church

tbc Ownerhip of

preferred

access is by

third party

(Diocesan

Board) - so

current

impediment

pending

ongoing

negotiations.

Yes, subject to

agreement of

access of

Tilstock Lane.

Parish Council

suport.

Yes -

greenfield site

in centre of

village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Outline planning

application

(14/03013/OUT).

Delivery indicated

for years 6-7 to

reflect access

ownership

constraint.

Potential

access

ownership

issue - could

affect viability.

Greenfield site in

centre of village.

Sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Outline planning

application

(14/03013/OUT).

Delivery likely but

indicated for years

6-7 to reflect

access ownership

constraint.

6 7 13

Tilstock TIL008sd 4 Yes Land adj. to

Russell House

tbc Yes - no

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes, subject to

re-use of on-

site garage on

site for

community

benefit. Parish

Council

support.

Yes -

greenfield site

on eastern

edge of

village.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site.

Outline application

submitted

(awaiting

validation).

Completions

forecast towards

the end of the first

5 year time period.

No known

viability

concerns.

Greenfield site on

eastern edge of

village.

Sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Outline

application

submitted

(awaiting

validation).

Delivery likely but

indicated for years

5-6 to reflect

market conditions.

6 6 6 6

Welsh

Frankton

WFTN002 4 Yes Land Adj. St

Andrews

Church

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

Sustainable

Development

Greenfield site

close to village

centre with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Actively promoted No known

viability

concerns

Greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

0 0 0

Welshampton WEL003 2 H&C Old Farm

Shop, A495

tbc No

impediments

noted.

Yes -

Sustainable

location within

settlement

boundary.

No significant

objections to

date.

Actively promoted

through SHLAA

process. Delivery

expected towards

the end of the first

5 year tranche.

No known

viability

concerns

SAMDev

settlement

strategy for

Welshampton

limits sites to a

maximum of five

dwellings.

5 5

Wem WEM009 2 No Land at Aston

Street

tbc No

impediments

noted.

Yes -

Sustainable

location within

settlement

boundary.

No significant

objections to

date.

Actively promoted

through SHLAA

process. Delivery

expected towards

the end of the first

5 year tranche.

No known

viability

concerns

Due to location

and surrounding

character, the site

could be suitable

for high density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of terraced

dwellings, town

houses or flats.

5 5

Wem WEM019 2 No Randford Way tbc No

impediments

noted.

Yes - planning

permission

granted in July

2014

(14/01428/FU

L)

The site is

within the

gardens of a

nursing home.

Other

surrounding

uses are

residential.

Application

approved and

funding

requirement

means delivery by

31st March 2018.

HCA funding. Simple

development site

with no

fundamental

planning issues.

5 5

Wem WEM022b 2 No Oak Avenue,

Wem

0.21 Minor issue

relating to

public

footpath

which is

currently

being

resolved.

Current

planning

application -

14/01730/FUL

No major

representation

made to date.

Application to be

determined early

2015. Forecast

completions

2015/16

Site has HCA

funding and

will be

completed

within the

grant

timeframe

2015 - 2018.

Site has HCA

funding and will

be completed

within the grant

timeframe 2015 -

2018.

12 12

Wem WEM042 2 No Barnard

Street, Wem

tbc Old police

station

building.

Current

planning

application -

14/01915/FUL

No major

representation

made to date.

Application to be

determined early

2015. Forecast

completions

2015/16

Site forms part

of HCA

funding bid

2015-2018 and

needs to be

completed

within this

time.

Site forms part of

HCA funding bid

2015-2018 and

needs to be

completed within

this time. HCA

funding now

secured.

6 6

Wem WEM003a 4 Yes Land off Pyms

Road

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

Sustainable

Development

Greenfield site

adjacent to

Development

Boundary with

no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Actively promoted No known

viability

concerns

Greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues.

Likely to be

delivered.

Greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues.

Likely to be

delivered: Current

Outline

Application

(14/02851/OUT)

under

consideration.

25 25 50 25 25 50

Wem WEM012 4 Yes Land at Tilley tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes - subject

to measures to

help address

local surface

water

management

issues

Greenfield site

adjacent to

Development

Boundary with

no

fundamental

planning

issues, but

significant

local

opposition.

Current Outline

Application

(14/02851/OUT)

No known

viability

concerns

Greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues.

Likely to be

delivered: Current

Outline

Application

(14/02851/OUT)

under

consideration.

12 13 25

Weston Rhyn WRN010 4 Yes Land south of

Brookfields

and Aspen

Grange

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

Sustainable

Development

Straightforwar

d greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support.

Current Outline

Application for 54

dwellings

(14/01654/OUT)

No known

viability

concerns

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered:

Current Outline

Application for 54

dwellings

(14/01654/OUT)

under

consideration.

27 27 54

Weston Rhyn WRN016 4 Yes Land at the

Sawmills

tbc No

impediments.

Single

landownership

.

Yes -

Sustainable

Development

Brownfield

site adjacent

to

Development

Boundary with

no significant

oustanding

objections and

Parish Council

support

Actively promoted No known

viability

concerns

Brownfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

10 10 10 10

Whitchurch WHIT013 2 No Former

Builders Yard,

Liverpool Road

tbc Principle of

development

broadly

supported on

the site, but

any new

application

will need to

review the

reasons for

the previous

refusal.

In outline

terms, low

density

development

is supported

on this site.

This is a

brownfield

site within thr

development

boundary.

Historically

promoted SHLAA

site and recent

planning

application

interest.

Development

viabilty may

be impacted

by the

previous use

on the site.

The site was

promoted to the

study for

development and

a previous

application for 14

dwellings has

been refused on

the site in the

past. However,

residential

development on

the site is in

principle

supported and

development at

low density (16no

dwellings) is

suggested as being

acceptable.

8 8 16

Whitchurch WHIT017 2 No Garages on

Wayland Close

tbc Would require

further

analysis of

garage uses

and any legal

agreements

that are in

place.

Site has been

deemed

suitable for

development

through the

SHLAA

assessment

process.

The site is

situated

within the

boundary of

the

settlement.

Historically

promoted SHLAA

site.

Small scale

development

site which may

be impacted

by demolition

and any

remediation

costs.

Development in

this area would be

suitable for high

density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of terraced

dwellings, town

houses or flats.

5 5

Delivery rates to be discussed

at settlement session. No

change in position.

Whitchurch WHIT021

(SAMDev)

2 Yes Off Black Park

Road/Alport

Road

tbc Allocation is

only part of

original

former Local

Plan allocation

which was

subject to an

access issue.

Welsh Water

issue re foul

sewerage

capacity not

preventing

commenceme

nt of

development.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Planning

permission to

be subject to a

condition

relating to

increasing foul

sewerage

capacity. Town

Council

support.

Yes -

greenfield site

on edge of

built up area

but relatively

close to town

centre - part of

former Local

Plan allocation

which can be

accessed

independently

off Alport

Road.

Sustainable

development.

Outline planning

application

14/01263/OUT

pending decision,

to be subject to

condition regarding

foul sewerage

capacity - permits

commencement of

development

pending

permanent

upgrade by Welsh

Water or

developer.

Foul sewerage

capacity

upgrade

required for

complete

build out of

development.

Sustainable

development.

Outline planning

application

14/01263/OUT to

be subject to a

condition relating

to increasing foul

sewerage

capacity. Town

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered, but full

build out subject

to permanent foul

sewerage capacity

upgrade, so

delivery indicated

over years 3-8.

20 20 20 60 15 15 30

Whitchurch WHIT034 2 No Land at

Sherrymill Hill

tbc Flood risk

mitigation

issues need to

be resolved.

No - requires

appropriate

flood risk

mitigation

before an

application

application

could be

progressed.

Site is within

the

development

boundary

ofthe

settlement.

Historically

promoted SHLAA

site.

Flood risk

mitigation

may impact on

scheme

viability.

The site is within

the development

boundary and

faces no

susbtantial

constraints to

delivery, providing

that flood risk can

be mitigated.

15 15

Delivery rates to be discussed

at settlement session. No

change in position.

Whitchurch WHIT009 4 Yes Tilstock Road tbc Yes. 3

landowners

but jointly

promoted and

agreement in

place.

Infrastructure

to be provided

linked to the

development

and complex

S106

Agreement

will be

required but

but no

fundamental

legal or

physical

impediments

to

commenceme

nt of

development.

Welsh Water

issue re foul

sewerage

capacity not

preventing

commenceme

nt of

development.

Yes, subject to

S106

Agreement

regarding

infrastructure

provision

including the

transfer of

land to local

sports clubs

and Education

Authority, and

condition

relating to

increasing foul

sewerage

capacity .

Town Council

support.

Yes, greenfield

site on edge of

settlement -

sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Current planning

application

(13/05077/OUT) by

Gladman

Developments to

be determined

imminently to be

subject to S106

Agreement

regarding

infrastructure

provision and

condition regarding

foul sewerage

capacity - permits

commencement of

development

pending

permanent

upgrade by Welsh

Water or

developer.

Marketing

commenced

October 2014.

Reserved matters

submission March

2015 and approval

July 2015. First

completions early

2016. Sales rate of

2 per month over

Plan period, with 2

developers on site

(4 sales per

month).

No viability

concerns as

infrastructure

requirements

identified

from outset

and linked to

allocation of

site, so

reflected in

land values.

Major greenfield

site on edge of

settlement -

sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Current planning

application

(13/05077/OUT)

by Gladman

Developments to

be determined

imminently.

Development

subject to S106

Agreement

regarding

infrastructure

provision including

the transfer of

land to local sports

clubs and

Education

Authority, and

condition relating

to increasing foul

sewerage

capacity. Town

Council support.

Marketing of site

commencing

October 2014.

Reserved matters

submission March

2015 and approval

July 2015. First

20 35 40 45 125 50 50 50 60 60 270 60 45 105

Delivery rates to be discussed

at settlement session. No

change in position.

Whitchurch WHIT046 4 Yes Land at Mount

Farm

tbc No

fundamental

legal or

physical

impediments.

Welsh Water

issue re foul

sewerage

capacity not

preventing

commenceme

nt of

development.

Yes -

sustainable

development.

Planning

permission to

be subject to a

condition

relating to

increasing foul

sewerage

capacity. Town

Council

support.

Greenfield site

on edge of

town.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

David Wilson

Homes to develop

site. Full planning

application

14/01264/FUL

pending decision,

to be subject to

condition regarding

foul sewerage

capacity - permits

commencement of

development

pending

permanent

upgrade by Welsh

Water or

developer.

Foul sewerage

capacity

upgrade

required for

complete

build out of

development.

Sustainable

development.

David Wilson

Homes to develop

site. Full planning

application

14/01264/FUL, to

be subject to a

condition relating

to increasing foul

sewerage

capacity. Town

Council support.

Likely to be

delivered, but full

build out subject

to permanent foul

sewerage capacity

upgrade, so

delivery indicated

over years 3-6.

10 20 25 25 80 20 20

Delivery rates to be discussed

at settlement session. No

change in position.

Whitchurch WHIT051sd 4 Yes Land North of

Waymills

tbc Yes as part of

mixed use

scheme linked

to ELR033 and

in accordance

with site

development

guidelines,

including

phasing. Town

Council

support.

Yes, subjet Yes -

greenfield site

on edge of

town.

Sustainable

development.

No

fundamental

planning

issues.

Promoted site. No known

viability

concerns -

linkage with

employment

land to be

addressed at

application

stage..

Greenfield site on

edge of town.

Sustainable

development. No

fundamental

planning issues.

Town Council

support. Part of

mixed use scheme

linked to ELR033

with site

development

guidelines,

including phasing,

so delivery

indicated over

years 4-7..

15 20 35 15 10 25

Whitchurch WHIT002/WHI

T004

6 No Land Opposite

Sunnyside Off

Wrexham

Road

Whitchurch

Shropshire

tbc No legal or

physical

impediments

to

development

identified.

Resolved to

Grant

14/00462/FUL -

on 3rd June

2014.

On the edge of

a settlement.

Completions

forecast - 2017/18

and 2018/19.

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

20 20 40 0

Whitchurch WHIT030 6 Yes Development

Land East Of

163 Wrexham

Road

Whitchurch

Shropshire

1.55 No major

impediments

to

development

identified.

Planning

application

14/00459/OUT

resolved to

grant on 1st

July 2014 for

31 dwellings.

On the edge of

a settlement.

Completions

forecast - 2016/17

and 2017/18.

No known

viability

concerns.

Edge of settlement

development now

with resolved to

grant.

16 15 31 0

Whittington WGN038 2 No A-Z

Engineering

LTD

tbc No legal or

physical

impediments

to

development

identified.

Suitable for

small scale

development

as identified in

the SHLAA

assessment.

Suitable

location within

the settlement

boundary.

Single unit

development

interest in the

recent past.

Promoted in the

SHLAA. Forecast

towards the end of

the first 5 year

delivery tranche.

Site

remediation

may be an

issue, which

will require

maximising

yield on the

site without

compromising

development

quality.

Site suitable for

low density

development

typically

comprising a mix

of semi detached

or detached

dwellings. A

single dwelling has

now been

approved and the

original yield of 9

has been reduced

to 8 to reflect this.

8 8

Whittington WGN001 4 Yes Land adjacent

to Oaklands

Drive

tbc Straightforwar

d greenfield

site.

No

fundamental

planning

issues

identified or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support.

No significant

outstanding

objections to

this suitable

site.

Site sponsor and

likely to be

delivered towards

the end of the first

5 year tranche.

No known

viability

concerns.

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered.

20 20

Whittington WGN004 4 Yes Land to the

rear of

Hershell

House

tbc Straightforwar

d greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Yes - no

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support.

No significant

outstanding

objections.

Planning

application

(14/03027/OUT)

submitted and

under

consideration.

No major

viability issues

raised at this

stage.

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered:

outline application

for 56 houses on

sites

WGN004/WGN00

5/WGN021

(14/03027/OUT)

submitted and

under

consideration.

2 2

Whittington WGN005 4 Yes Land to South

East of School

tbc Straightforwar

d greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Yes - no

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support.

No significant

outstanding

objections.

Planning

application

(14/03027/OUT)

submitted and

under

consideration.

No major

viability issues

raised at this

stage.

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered:

outline application

for 56 houses on

sites

WGN004/WGN00

5/WGN021

(14/03027/OUT)

submitted and

under

consideration.

8 8

Whittington WGN021 4 Yes Land adj. to

Big House &

Leefields

tbc Straightforwar

d greenfield

site with no

fundamental

planning

issues.

Yes - no

fundamental

planning

issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support.

No significant

outstanding

objections.

Planning

application

(14/03027/OUT)

submitted and

under

consideration.

No major

viability issues

raised at this

stage.

Straightforward

greenfield site

with no

fundamental

planning issues or

significant

outstanding

objections and

Parish Council

support. Likely to

be delivered:

outline application

for 56 houses on

sites

WGN004/WGN00

5/WGN021

(14/03027/OUT)

submitted and

under

consideration.

10 10 20 10 10 6 26

4582 4536 1713