EVS Final Ppt

download EVS Final Ppt

of 33

Transcript of EVS Final Ppt

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    1/33

    Presented by -

    Ralena Moras -31

    Ajith Menezes-29Vinita DSouza -26

    James Johnson-27

    Julaius Mathana -28

    Ashwin Milton-30

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    2/33

    Introduction to Environmental

    Economics

    Environmental economics is the subset of economics

    that is concerned with the efficient allocation of

    environmental resources.

    Environmental economics takes into consideration

    issues such as the conservation of natural resources,pollution control, waste management and efficient

    creation of emission standards

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    3/33

    Economic view

    The key objective of

    environmental economics is

    to identify those particular

    tools or policy alternatives

    that will move the market

    toward the most efficient

    allocation of natural

    resources.

    When the market fails toallocate the resources

    efficiently, market failure

    can occur.

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    4/33

    The Law of Diminishing Returns

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    5/33

    The Law of Diminishing Returns The theory was effectively applied by Garrett Hardin in his

    1968 article on the tragedy of the commons in which he

    looked at many common property resources, such as air,

    water, and forests, and described their use as being subject to

    diminishing returns.

    The challenge whether it be local, regional, national, or

    global is how best to manage the problem of declining

    resource-to-people ratios that could lead to a reducedstandard of living

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    6/33

    Carrying Capacity One population issue is that ofcarrying capacity the

    number of individuals an ecosystem can support without

    having any negative effects.

    If carrying capacity is exceeded, living organisms must adapt

    to new levels of consumption or find alternative resources.

    Carrying capacity often serves as the basis for sustainabledevelopment policies that attempt to balance the needs of

    today against the resources that will be needed in the future.

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    7/33

    Carrying Capacity4 Cows

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    8/33

    Carrying Capacity While the exact value of the human carrying capacity is

    uncertain and continues to be under debate, there has been

    evidence of the strain that both overpopulation and over-

    consumption has placed on some societies and the

    environment.

    In the meantime, actions to reduce the strain and ensure

    natural resource recovery for the future will depend on an

    increase of sustainable development policies worldwide.

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    9/33

    Sustainable Development Development that meets the needs of the

    present without compromising the ability of

    future generations to meet their own needs

    Economic growth, environmental protection, and

    social equity, and suggested that all three can beachieved by gradually changing the ways in which

    we develop and use technologies

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    10/33

    Sustainable Development

    Environment

    Society

    Economy

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    11/33

    Sustainable Development

    Current Reality Time Future

    Unsustainable

    Sustainability

    SustainableEconomy

    Environment

    Society

    Economy

    Society

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    12/33

    How Markets WorkSupply

    and Demand The market is an economic activity which is organized between buyers and

    sellers through their behavior and interaction with one another.

    The interaction of buyers and sellers in the market helps to determine the

    market price, thereby allocating scarce goods and services efficiently.

    The inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded is so

    universal that it is called the law of demand. The higher the price, the

    lower the quantity demanded - and the lower the price, higher quantity is

    demanded

    The law of supplyis just the opposite: the higher the price, the higher the

    quantity supplied - and the lower the price, less quantity is supplied

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    13/33

    Variables That Influence

    Price

    Income

    Prices of related goods

    Tastes

    Expectations

    Number of Buyers

    Buyers(Demand)

    Price

    Input prices

    Technology

    Expectations

    Number of sellers

    Sellers(Supplier)

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    14/33

    Externalities

    Externalities are unintentional side effects of anactivity affecting people other than thosedirectly involved in the activity.

    1. Negative externality

    2. Positive externality - "free riders

    Traditionally both are considered to be forms ofmarket failures i.e. where a free market doesnot allocate its resources efficiently.

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    15/33

    Arthur Pigou, a British economist, argued that theexistence of externalities justified governmentintervention through legislation or regulation.

    Pigovian taxes and subsidies

    Many economists believe that Pigovian taxes are better

    than government imposed regulations

    Taxes leave the decision of how to deal with pollution toindividual sources by assessing a fee or "tax" on theamount of pollution that is generated.

    Cap and Trade - bought or sold, or banked for future

    Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs)eg Fisheries

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    16/33

    Ecosystem valuation

    Valuation can be a useful tool that aids in evaluating

    different options that a natural resource manager might face.

    It is the process by which policymakers assign a value,

    monetary or otherwise to environmental resources or to

    the outputs and/or services provided by those resources. E.g.

    Mangroves

    Environmental resources are particularly hard to quantify

    due to their intangible benefits and multiple value options.

    E.g. Wood

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    17/33

    There are typically 2 ways to assign value to

    environmental resources and servicesuse andnon-use

    Market or Opportunity cost pricing

    Hedonic pricing

    Contingent valuation

    Cost-benefit analysis - requires the quantificationof possible impacts of a proposed project. Theimpacts could be physical or monetary.

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    18/33

    Cost-benefit analysis

    It involves a comparison of the costs of an action compared with

    considerations of the benefits of that action. However, for publicpolicy it is formalized and quantitative.

    Base situation or what would happen if no changes were made

    Identify the relevant time period by which the costs and benefits

    be realized.

    Valuation and discounting only costs of true externalities aretaken into account & not secondary effects

    After all benefits and costs have been given a common unit of

    measurement, options can be evaluated.

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    19/33

    Environmental Impact Analysis

    An environmental impact analysis is typically conducted to

    assess the potential impact a proposed development project

    will have on the natural and social environment

    This may include an assessment of both the short- and long-term effects on the physical environment, such as air, water

    and/or noise pollution; as well as effects on local services, living

    and health standards, and aesthetic

    Environmental impact analyses are often challenging because

    they call for making projections with incomplete information.

    Methods of assessing the impacts typically include both

    objective and subjective information making it difficult to

    quantify

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    20/33

    Case study

    Social Forestry in Karnataka:An

    impact analysis-D M Chandrashekhar

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    21/33

    Background

    Forest based industries leading to destruction

    of forests

    Karnataka government taken reforestation

    programme with single-stand eucalyptus

    plantations

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    22/33

    Area of forests shrunk..Resettling the refugees and displaced

    Encroachment of forest lands for cultivation

    Submersion of forests due to irrigation projects

    Clearing forest for electric transmission lines

    To meet demand by urban people for timber

    and fuel

    Forest fire

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    23/33

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    24/33

    The main culprit: Eucalyptus

    plantations

    It is water intensive

    It is nutrient intensive

    It is toxic

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    25/33

    Problem

    Felling of 40,000 hectares of land in Sirsi-Yellapur region under natural forest cover

    Raised single stand hybrid eucalyptus

    plantations without trialsResult Total destruction by fungus

    cortecium salmonicolor.

    Reason for destruction Eucalyptus notsuited for high rainfall and low altitude

    conditions

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    26/33

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    27/33

    Basis for social forestry

    Serving the rural community

    No plantations of eucalyptus mentioned

    The forest department launched a massiveprogramme to propagate monoculture on

    farmlands to meet needs of industry

    Forest department nurseries started

    Has it helped?????

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    28/33

    Review of social forestry programme

    in Kolar and Bangalore districts

    KOLAR-(1975-1983)-611.31 lakhs of eucalyptus

    seedlings distributed

    BANGALORE-247.63 lakhs

    63.3% raised on agriculture land in kolar and

    49.6% in Bangalore

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    29/33

    Land reforms and eucalyptus

    plantations

    Abolition of tenancy act

    The act posed threat to landowners

    Switching from food crop to eucalyptus plantations

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    30/33

    Outcomes

    Reduction in grazing resources

    Permanent destruction of lands

    Land unfit for agriculture-foodcrops

    Lands deemed as C & D type

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    31/33

    Government move Approved joint sector plantations

    Approved plantations of eucalyptus on 30000hectares of C and D type

    Wasteland development programme-plantations of 5

    mn hectares annually

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    32/33

    Opposition

    By peasant community-uprooted lakhs of

    eucalyptus seedlings at Tumkur district

    Plantations not allowed in Chikmaglur district

    Formation of Mannu Rakshana Koota(Save

    soil forum)

    Protest again government schemes

    disregarding rural people

  • 8/2/2019 EVS Final Ppt

    33/33

    Activities

    Farmers ready to organize plantings for 250 million

    saplings of multiple use species

    The State level federation of voluntary organizations

    for rural development in Karnataka(FERVORD-K)requested government on change in forestry policy

    Karnataka Forest plantations corporation sponsored

    a 10 day visit to Gujarat

    Environmental education programmes undertaken

    Village level organizations initiated afforestation