Evolution of distribution systems

145
Evolution of distribution models and sales strategies

description

 

Transcript of Evolution of distribution systems

Page 1: Evolution of distribution systems

Evolution of distributionmodels and sales strategies

Page 2: Evolution of distribution systems

It seems, that everything is OK

And every day…

Page 3: Evolution of distribution systems

The model was successful and

profitable

Manufacturers solve similar tasks

But in the new conditions the model

is not working. And the issue is

not the crisis

We need to grow both topline and

bottomline

1 2 3

Page 4: Evolution of distribution systems

But perhaps not all of us accept the real problems

The market has changed, but our mindset is the same

Distribution Model

Segmentation

TradeTerms

Something has happened with our sales –“crisis, it seems”

Page 5: Evolution of distribution systems

Retail chains are growing:

Revenue ’10: $11 bln

Q1 ‘11:+ 50 % revenue

+ 64 % EBITDA

X5

Page 6: Evolution of distribution systems

2000 2010

Retail chainsDistrbutorsManufacturers

The market has changed irreversibly

Retail chains are growing and competing for the best prices

The margin is going from production to retail

From distribution the margin has already gone

Those who do not feel it today – will confront it to-morrow

Manufacturers, overstepped $1mlrd, escaped from this problem

How the other producers must behave on the new market ?

Margin split

Page 7: Evolution of distribution systems

In sales — as on the boat

Page 8: Evolution of distribution systems

How not to crashin the first days…

Page 9: Evolution of distribution systems

And how to become the leaderin the next days…

Page 10: Evolution of distribution systems

Business Models are developingIf you don’t improve yours, you leak

Page 11: Evolution of distribution systems

What to do?

Page 12: Evolution of distribution systems

Start from theright model !

Page 13: Evolution of distribution systems

Which hasstrong musts *

* Distribution models

Page 14: Evolution of distribution systems

Flexibly adjustable Sails*

* Trade terms

Page 15: Evolution of distribution systems

Route *, which will bring you to the correct port

X

* Segmentation

Page 16: Evolution of distribution systems

What does our boat consist of ?

Distribution model

Trade terms Business processes

Training and development

Segmentation The captain

Communications

Page 17: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution modelTransfer to another

1 big

The best 100

Trade terms

Segmentation

Page 18: Evolution of distribution systems

Route to the market —is the answer to the question : «HOW ?»

230 000 outletsManufacturers

Page 19: Evolution of distribution systems

The are three “route to market” models

Localdistributors

Transfer to another manufacturer

NationalDistributor

Page 20: Evolution of distribution systems

Transfer to another manufacturer

Another manufacturer distributes your product

Page 21: Evolution of distribution systems

Another manufacturer distributes your product

Page 22: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution modelTransfer to another

1 big

The best 100

Trade terms

Segmentation

Page 23: Evolution of distribution systems

In 90s importers were called distributors

Page 24: Evolution of distribution systems

0 5 10

Megapolis

SNS

Kubanopt

Pivdom

CDK

2006

2007

2008

2009

In 2000s new type of Pan-Russia distributors appeared

…and caught up in turnover key manufacturers and retailers

Megapolis:190 branches140 000 outlets covered13 000 employees

$ mlrd / year

Page 25: Evolution of distribution systems

0 5 10

Megapolis

SNS

Unimilk

konditery

Russkoe more

2006

2007

2008

2009

National distributors showbetter growth than producers

Objedinennie

$ mlrd / year

Page 26: Evolution of distribution systems

0 5 10

Megapolis

SNS

Auchan

Magnit

Х5

2006

2007

2008

2009

And compete with key retailers

$ mlrd / year

Page 27: Evolution of distribution systems

2006 2010

Will FMCG catch up pharmaceuticalmarket in consolidation ?

Pharmaceutical

Others

TOP 5 distributors

FMCG

2006 2010

8% 70%

Page 28: Evolution of distribution systems

Consolidation of distribution –was one of the ways to save the margin

VerticalIntegration

Retail Chains

Own brandsproduction

Enter new product categories

Enter new territories

Warehousing

Logistic

Horizontal integration

Services

Page 29: Evolution of distribution systems

Horizontal integration of distributors is initiated by producers

Manufacturers, overstepped $1 mlrd, decrease number of their distributors

The best distributors get new cities on expense of the weak ones

Page 30: Evolution of distribution systems

Horizontal integration of distributors is initiated by producers

Manufacturers, overstepped $1 mlrd, decrease number of their distributors

The best distributors get new cities on expense of the weak ones

Then they organize “general price”, it can be used by other producers

Page 31: Evolution of distribution systems

Except sales, merchandising function has also changed

Retailers planogrammSales

Producer planogramm

Share of shelf

Additional space

Page 32: Evolution of distribution systems

And merchandisers also became national

Shared services (1 person merchandises several producers) was the reaction to reduction in the functional

There are national agencies with salary fund $10+ mln a year

Why are their services cheaper ?

Due to scale effect they organize processes better than manufacturers

Merchandiser spends more time in the outlets and less on the way

Page 33: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution modelTransfer to another

1 big

The best 100

Trade terms

Segmentation

Page 34: Evolution of distribution systems

Strata Population N of cities

А over 1 mln 13

В 500’000 – 1 mln 22

С 100’000 – 500’000 132

D less 100’000

Why100 distributors?

24 City-satellite

44 Administrative center

63 Remote city

Page 35: Evolution of distribution systems

Strata Population N of cities

А over 1 mln 13

В 500’000 – 1 mln 22

С 100’000 – 500’000 132

D less 100’000

24 City-satellite

44 Administrative center

63 Remote city

100∑=

Why100 distributors?

Page 36: Evolution of distribution systems

These 100 cities «weigh» 75% of the market

There are 230.000 outlets in Russia

100.000 of them are in these 100 cities

100 cities are covered by distributors

The other cities are covered by wholesale40%

75%

Numeric Weighted

the other cities

TOP 100 cities

Outlets distribution

Page 37: Evolution of distribution systems

Usually one distributor is selected in the city

The strongest one !

Many manufacturers hired sales representatives

Then manufacturer has to be the “preferred supplier”

Page 38: Evolution of distribution systems

Service of distributor is:

Warehousing, delivery, cash collection

Additional credit

Legal flexibility

Fast decisions

Page 39: Evolution of distribution systems

Agent drives the truck with product, when he gets an order, he collects it and delivers to the outlet

Agent takes the order, passes to warehouse, and it is collected and delivered the next days

Delivery can be provided by two types:

Pre salesVan sales

Page 40: Evolution of distribution systems

In each city there can be three models

DSDDirect Sales and Delivery

DS3Direct Sales Third

party delivery

3PDThird Party sales

and Delivery

Warehousing and delivery

Manufacturer

Distributor

Distributor

Sales management

Manufacturer

Page 41: Evolution of distribution systems

What system is this ?

One national distributor over Russia

1000 merchandisers of manufacturer

Two persons come to the outlet:

To take the order

To merchandise

Page 42: Evolution of distribution systems

What system is this ?

Distributor opens entity, which sells only manufacturer product

Sales agents are in distributors headcount, but fully managed by manufacturer

Manufacturer approves of distributor’s P&Ls and ensures bottom line

Page 43: Evolution of distribution systems

Control over shelves

Cost to serve

What system to use ?

DSD

3PD

DS3

Fast development with minimum investments

Cheap non branded products

low sales, low marginal product

3PD

High sales, high marginal product

Short shelf life products

DSD

Page 44: Evolution of distribution systems

DSD

3PD

DS3

Control over shelves

Cost to serve

Cost to serve vs. control

Page 45: Evolution of distribution systems

Cost to serve vs. control — many havehigh cost low productive model

DSD

3PD

DS3

Control over shelves

Cost to serveHigh investment,

No result

Page 46: Evolution of distribution systems

Control over shelves

Cost to serve vs. control and onlyspecific get distribution for free

DSD

3PD

DS3

Cost to serve

«Creep -product»

Page 47: Evolution of distribution systems

Usually models are adequate to turnover and margin

Control over shelves

Cost to serve

DSD

3PD

DS3

Page 48: Evolution of distribution systems

3PD distributors are not manageable

In the past the targets were like this

We have to convert operations to DS3

Hired 500 sales representatives

50 000 outlets covered

1 2 3

Page 49: Evolution of distribution systems

Conversion to 3PD —is adherence to the route

The model should be“easy to sell” to distributors

The model should allow manufacturer to get ROI in a year

“General price”

“mixed” teams

“ballast” product

Exclusive teams

Page 50: Evolution of distribution systems

900 Euromanufacturer contribution

Sales per agent30.000 Euro

Distributor’s markup

3% = 900 EuroDistributor’s contribution

Sales increased twice up to 60.000 Euro

In a year

3% = 1.800 Euro

distributor contributionAgent wages

1.800 Euro

and stops investments of manufacturer in a year

DS3 model should be “easy to sell” to distributors …

Agent wages1800 Euro

Page 51: Evolution of distribution systems

Nowdays DS3 in Traditional Trade became less effective

Sales per outlets dropped – delivery cost increased

Quantity of shops decreased, traffic jams intensified – effectiveness of routes decreased

So agent’s salary eats the margin

Only those who overstepped $1 mlrd do not feel it yet

Page 52: Evolution of distribution systems

How to make DS3 cheaper ?

If your average order less than minimum delivery lot

If you already can not pay the salary to the agent

Then mixed teams — is your solution !

Page 53: Evolution of distribution systems

How to organize and manage mixed teams ?

The products should :

Not compete among themselves

To be within one category

To have similar sales per outlet

Belong to markets with equal volatility

Have similar consumer loyalty to brands

Page 54: Evolution of distribution systems

Your contribution to agents wages:

For the Euro of your sales agent gets commission more than for the other products

Ideally they pay fix part, and you pay bonus :-)

Hoe to organize and manage mixed teams ?

The products should :

Not compete among themselves

To be within one category

To have similar sales per outlet

Belong to markets with equal volatile

Have similar consumer loyalty to brands

Page 55: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade termsDiscount

Federal Trade Law

Should retail chains get back to distribution ?

Segmentation

Page 56: Evolution of distribution systems

Discounts classification

ConditionNo condition

RetrospectiveProspective

Pay for performancePay for compliance

TangibleIntangible

Page 57: Evolution of distribution systems

Methods of Regulation of rebates

On invoice discount

Cash bonus (no VAT)

Free product

Marketing services agreement (bank transfer or cross cancellation of debts)

Page 58: Evolution of distribution systems

Tax code

On invoice discount < 20%

Each channel has its price list

Discounts are accompanied with the documents

Page 59: Evolution of distribution systems

Discounts classificator – important sales instrument

Name of discount

Condition of charge

Retrospect / Prospect

Method of regulation

Budget owner

Maximum value

. . .

Prepayment

Transfer is on our account

Retrospective

On invoice discount

Sales director

3%

. . .

Page 60: Evolution of distribution systems

I recommend to evaluate discount annually

Sales volumes

Depth of discounts

АВ

Page 61: Evolution of distribution systems

I recommend to evaluate discount annually

Sales volumes

Depth of discounts

АВ

ВА

Page 62: Evolution of distribution systems

Regional pricing

Landed cost

influence:

transshipments

Retail Shelf Price

P&Ls of regions

Convenience for retail chains

Fight with competitionВладивостокСмоленск

Производитель

Дистрибьютор

Page 63: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade termsDiscount

Federal Trade Law

Rebates

RSP

Distribution

Should retail chains get back to distribution ?

Segmentation

Page 64: Evolution of distribution systems

Before the law

Price for distributor

Retail Shelf Price

Traditional Trade Local chains National Chains

Manufacturer

Price for retail

Unified national invoice price

Personal Rebate

Page 65: Evolution of distribution systems

Retail Shelf Price

Traditional Trade Local chains National chains

Price for distributor

Manufacturer

Price for retail

Unified price is destroyed, RB converted to discount

On-invoice discount

After the law

Page 66: Evolution of distribution systems

Retail Shelf Price

Traditional Trade Local chains National chains

Price for distributor

Manufacturer

Price for retail

Unified Price remains,RB converted into marketing

Marketing services

After the law

Page 67: Evolution of distribution systems

Transit of rebates into marketing

If rebates were not converted to discounts, they were transited into marketing

Transit of money into marketing services rose prices by 30%

In conttrast to cash bonus, marketing agreements are imposed by 38% tax

Page 68: Evolution of distribution systems

Saved Unified National Price

Converted extra RB into marketing

Huge manufacturers with strong competitors

How did it influence the market players ?

Page 69: Evolution of distribution systems

Huge manufacturers who dominated in the category unalternatively won

As they did not have RB over legal 10%

Even if they had — RB decreased down to 10%

Page 70: Evolution of distribution systems

Small manufacturers arewashed away from shelves

Because they can not develop brands during such a growth of prices on promotion instruments

Page 71: Evolution of distribution systems

Due to the Law we will decreasethe distance with West Europe

Set of brands on WE shelves is repetitive

The Law «thins out» number of small producers in Russia

Page 72: Evolution of distribution systems

Promo actions forecasting turned into casino

You produce promo product,

and retail chains do not

purchase it

Page 73: Evolution of distribution systems

If marketing will be prohibited …..

Chains increase “service

level”

By penalties chains can take

the leftover of RB, and it can

not be parted from supply

contract

Page 74: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade termsDiscount

Federal Trade Law

Rebates

RSP

Distribution

Should retail chains get back to distribution ?

Segmentation

Page 75: Evolution of distribution systems

Government price regulation was before the Law

Bunge 2007

Price was frozen for 6 months

The market price increased by 20%

The same happened with WimmBillDan

Page 76: Evolution of distribution systems

Formation of commodity market prices starts from the crop

Since buckwheat was the usual crop failure

Crop failure - the only way the farmer "recapture" loses in the years of overproduction

Only in the EU government during overproduction buys crops at a fixed price

0

50

100

Январь

Февраль

Март

Апрель

Май

Июнь

Июль

Август

Сентябрь

Октябрь

Ноябрь

Декабрь

Rur/kilo

Raw materials

2010

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Page 77: Evolution of distribution systems

0

50

100

Январь

Февраль

Март

Апрель

Май

Июнь

Июль

Август

Сентябрь

Октябрь

Ноябрь

Декабрь

Rur/kilo

Raw materials

Retail shelf price

Retailers markup depends on:

1. other retailers RSP for KVIs

2. And average market mark up for niche products

When producers feel bankrupt they choose penalties for underdelivery, and the shelf increase exceeds “legal” 30%

But on the shelves of retailers market prices ends

2010

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Page 78: Evolution of distribution systems

«The buckwheat criminal case» was raised

Federal Law #381

Implemented since august 2010

Page 79: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade termsDiscount

Federal Trade Law

Rebates

RSP

Distribution

Should retail chains get back to distribution ?

Segmentation

Page 80: Evolution of distribution systems

Everybody can buy distribution contract now

ст 9 п 10, ст 13

It is impossible to prohibit or charge change of owners of the contract

In conjunction with the illegal restriction of the territory, theoretically “Pan Russia distribution” can be purchased

Page 81: Evolution of distribution systems

And you can not oblige distributor to sell :

ст 9 п 12

promote all SKUs

place POSM

motivate sales agents

set responsibility for distribution

translate retail promos

serve clients )

Page 82: Evolution of distribution systems

…and now it’s a soother

Earlier you could read distribution agreement

Page 83: Evolution of distribution systems

Who wins, if relationships move to the shadow ?

Page 84: Evolution of distribution systems

КeyАccountsМanager

Who wins, if relationships move to the shadow ?

Page 85: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade termsDiscount

Federal Trade Law

Rebates

RSP

Distribution

Should retail chains get back to distribution ?

Segmentation

Page 86: Evolution of distribution systems

Trade termschange the market

Page 87: Evolution of distribution systems

WIll retail chains return to distribution ?

Page 88: Evolution of distribution systems

Vertical integration into retail chains – was one of the ways for distributors to save the margin

VerticalIntegration

Retail Chains

Own brandsproduction

Enter new product categories

Enter new territories

Warehousing

Logistic

Horizontal integration

Services

Page 89: Evolution of distribution systems

And distributors soon …

Tander

Uniland

Sweet Life

R-Modul

Pallada Torg

Page 90: Evolution of distribution systems

Turned into a beautyfull retailers

Magnit

Dixi

Spar NN

Monetka

Sberegaika

Tander

Uniland

Sweet Life

R-Modul

Pallada Torg

Page 91: Evolution of distribution systems

Fragmentation of supply will continue further more the price distance with TOP retailers

1 x

One city – one distributor

Page 92: Evolution of distribution systems

Fragmentation of supply will continue further more the price distance with TOP retailers

1 x 5 x

+ direct deliveries to DCs of local and national retailers

1+ 2 + 2

One city – one distributor

Page 93: Evolution of distribution systems

So, will chains return to distribution ?

Distribution centers work perfectly

Prices are lower than distributors’

Price is “washed” from rebates

Direct supply contracts with producers

Distribution can be “bought”

Distributors ChainsChains -

distributors

Page 94: Evolution of distribution systems

Resources are restricted —where to invest ?

OPEX and CAPEX of national start up even for 2.000 SKUs can be compared with hundred discounters

Should distribution be in perspective as profitable as retail ?

There is space for retail brand developing – who is ready to invest in non profile business ?

Page 95: Evolution of distribution systems

There are also mental barriers

Will the shops allow to depend on one supplier ?

Will the shops buy from competitor ?

How long will it take to convert Buying organization into Selling ?

Page 96: Evolution of distribution systems

Sanctum is under the risks –the business processes efficiency

Stock level will grow — forecasting deteriorates when you do not manage the shop

Transshipments, commodity … pricing solutions are to be taken quickly and locally

Orders return to warehouse, assembling and delivering apiece, cash collection …

Page 97: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade terms

SegmentationIntroRetailDistributionPeople

Page 98: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation:

— Subject

— Process

— Parameters

Page 99: Evolution of distribution systems

Subject of segmentation

Employees

Distributors

Wholesellers

Retailers

….

Page 100: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation process

identify

analyze

prioritize

develop plan

realize plan

analyze again

Page 101: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation parameters

Sales

parameters

Sales volumes

Market share

Price segment

Growth rate

Sales channel parameters

margin

speed to market

risks

Retail outletparameters

Format

Marketing value

Page 102: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation matrix changes rapidly

Before: 50 meters, 60 km/hour

Page 103: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation matrix changes rapidly

Before: 50 meters, 60 km/hour

Today: 10 meters, 100 km/hour

Page 104: Evolution of distribution systems

Coefficient of investment

performance= Investment index

Revenue Index Market share indexх

You need to evaluate investments annually

Page 105: Evolution of distribution systems

Coefficient of investment performance

Parameter Sample 1

Revenue Index 80

Investment index 100

Market share index 90

Coefficient of investment performance 72

Page 106: Evolution of distribution systems

Coefficient of investment performance

Revenue and market share dropped with the

same level of investments

Parameter Sample 1

Revenue Index 80

Investment index 100

Market share index 90

Coefficient of investment performance 72

Page 107: Evolution of distribution systems

Parameter Sample 2

Revenue Index 115

Investment index 105

Market share index 110

Coefficient of investment performance 120

Coefficient of investment performance

Page 108: Evolution of distribution systems

Parameter Sample 2

Revenue Index 115

Investment index 105

Market share index 110

Coefficient of investment performance 120

Coefficient of investment performance

Revenue and market share growth overruns growth of investments

Page 109: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade terms

SegmentationIntroRetailDistributionPeople

Page 110: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation by retail formats

Hypermarket

Supermarket

Discounter

Grocery

Kiosk

Page 111: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation by sales volumes

# of retail outlets

100%25 50 75

Sal

es V

olu

mes

А

В

СD

Segment А

Page 112: Evolution of distribution systems

Segmentation by sales volumes

# of retail outlets

100%25 50 75

Sal

es V

olu

mes

А

В

СD

Segment А

Segmentation by sales volumes —volumes of your product or your category?

Page 113: Evolution of distribution systems

2-D segmentation with price segments

Pricesegment

Объем

D

C

B

A

Low Medium Premium

Page 114: Evolution of distribution systems

2-D for premium products

Pricesegment

Volume

D

C

B

A

Low Medium Premium

Page 115: Evolution of distribution systems

2-D for premium products

Pricesegment

Volume

D

C

B

A

Low Medium Premium

Page 116: Evolution of distribution systems

2-D for value products

Price segment

Volume

D

C

B

A

Low Medium Premium

Page 117: Evolution of distribution systems

2-D for value products

Price segment

Volume

D

C

B

A

Low Medium Premium

Page 118: Evolution of distribution systems

Retail investments need to be optimized too

There are 22 500 modern

trade retail outlets in Russia

They form 50% of the market

-

10 000

South North

Non active

Active clients with investments

Active clients with investments AND profitable

Active clients with investments AND NOT profitable

# of outlets

Page 119: Evolution of distribution systems

-

10 000

South North

Non active

Active clients with investments

Active clients with investments AND profitable

Active clients with investments AND NOT profitable

Retail investments need to be optimized too

There are 22 500 modern

trade retail outlets in Russia

They form 50% of the market

# of outlets

Transfer of investments improves bottom line and topline

Page 120: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade terms

SegmentationIntroRetailDistributionPeople

Page 121: Evolution of distribution systems

All distributors are different —how to compare an apple with an orange ?

Page 122: Evolution of distribution systems

All distributors are different —how to compare an apple with an orange ?

3 key parameters

Power of distributor

Efficiency of manager

Size of distributor

Page 123: Evolution of distribution systems

3PD distributor’s Profile

Territory coverage

Modern Trade

Traditional Trade

Wholesale

Opportunity to promote product

Sales reps motivation is effective

Promo for retail is effective

All your SKUs are in matrix

General

Growth vs LY

Price architecture

Finance discipline

Page 124: Evolution of distribution systems

Distributors power and managers’ efficiency

0%

50%

100%Distributor’s power

Managers’ efficiency

Page 125: Evolution of distribution systems

Distributors power and managers’ efficiency

0%

50%

100%Distributor’s power

Managers’ efficiency

Page 126: Evolution of distribution systems

Distributors power and managers’ efficiency

0%

50%

100%

Distributor’s power

Managers’ efficiency

Page 127: Evolution of distribution systems

0%

50%

100%

To cover Russia effectively you need 100

distributors. You have more ?

# of distributors

Sales Volumes

Last 15% clients weigh 3% sales

100%

Page 128: Evolution of distribution systems

You can segment the problem and solutions :

To grow

To consolidate

To convert to sub-distributor

The only client at regional center

Second clientat regional center

Remote city

Page 129: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade terms

SegmentationIntroRetailDistributionPeople

Page 130: Evolution of distribution systems

If your DS3 are more expensive every year …

Chicago

To develop

New York

Philadelphia

# active clients per sales agent

Salary / Sales per agent

Florida

Oklahoma

Washington

San-Hose To convert to 3PD

100

50

10%

Page 131: Evolution of distribution systems

Perhaps, DS3 is not so effective, as you did not

allocate territories properly …

Producer

Distributor

“General price” DS3 sales agent KAM DS3

Traditional trade, city

Modern trade, cityTraditional Trade, suburbs

Wholesale

Page 132: Evolution of distribution systems

Or sales organigram does not correspond to the business model ?

Page 133: Evolution of distribution systems

The organigramm can be as this:

Boss

Assistant

Sales Force

Page 134: Evolution of distribution systems

Or based on the objectives

Objectives – V, MC, MS

Route to market model

# of people in the field

Organigramm to support field force management

Page 135: Evolution of distribution systems

Distribution model

Trade terms

Segmentation

Page 136: Evolution of distribution systems

So we have three key parts of our boat …

Distribution Model

Trade terms

Segmentation

Page 137: Evolution of distribution systems

So we have three key parts of our boat …

Distribution Model

Trade terms Business

processes

Learning and

development

SegmentationThe Captain

Internal

communications

But the synergy comes when you get the others

Page 138: Evolution of distribution systems

In sales — as on the boat

Page 139: Evolution of distribution systems

But there are no similar yachts, as well as similar companies. Your strategy should be based on your competitive advantages

In sales — as on the boat

Page 140: Evolution of distribution systems

Administrative resourse * ?

* 0% taxes

Page 141: Evolution of distribution systems

Unique construction * ?

* 100 km / hrs

Page 142: Evolution of distribution systems

Muscles ?

Page 143: Evolution of distribution systems

Special sail– spinnaker ?

Page 144: Evolution of distribution systems

I wish you find your spinnaker!

Page 145: Evolution of distribution systems

Thank you !