Evaluation of whole-community genome DNA amplification methods with microarrays
description
Transcript of Evaluation of whole-community genome DNA amplification methods with microarrays
Evaluation of whole-community genome DNA amplification methods with microarrays
Jian Wang 1, 2, Joy D. Van Nostrand 2, 3, Liyou Wu 2, 3, Zhili He 2, 3, Guanghe Li 1 , and Jizhong Zhou 1, 2, 3, *
Supplemental materials
S1
1 School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China2 Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK3 Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
*Corresponding author: Dr. Jizhong Zhou Institute for Environmental Genomics (IEG) Department of Botany and Microbiology University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019 Phone: 405-325-6073
Fax: 405-325-7552 E-mail: [email protected]
Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009B
Unamplified Bst REPLI-g
Unamplified Bst REPLI-g
A Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough
S2
GenesGenes Genes
GenesGenes Genes
Templiphi
Genes
Templiphi
Genes
Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus X514
C
D
Unamplified Bst REPLI-g
Unamplified Bst REPLI-g
Shenwanella oneidensis MR-1
FIG. S1. Ratio of signal intensity of Cy5 to Cy3 (unamplfied DNA, DNA amplified by Bst, REPLI-g and Templiphi to unamplified DNA) of individual gene for pure culture genome. (A) Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough, (B) Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009, (C) Shenwanella oneidensis MR-1 and (D) Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus X514.
S3
GenesGenes Genes
GenesGenes Genes
Genes
Templiphi
Genes
Templiphi
FIG. S2. Ratio of signal intensity of amplified to unamplified DNA (DNA amplified by Bst, REPLI-g and Templiphi to unamplified DNA) of individual gene detected by GeoChip for the community sample. Bst: amplified with Bst, Bst_S: amplified with Bst and sonicated before labeling, REPLI-g: amplified with REPLI-g, REPLI-g_S: amplified with REPLI-g and sonicated before labeling, Templiphi: amplified with Templiphi, Templiphi_S.
0.1
1
10Bst REPLI-g
S4
Bst_S REPLI-g_S
Genes Genes
Templiphi
Genes
Templiphi_S
S5
FIG. S3. Scatter plot of Cy5/Cy3 ratios of biased genes in aDNA amplified by the three MDA methods. DNA of Shenwanella oneidensis MR-1 was used as the template. The genes whose Cy5/Cy3 ratios in any aDNA showed >1 fold are defined as biased genes. The results suggested that the different MDA methods would produce different biased genes.
R² = 0.1376
0.25
1
4
0.125 1 8
Bst vs REPLI-g
R² = 0.17420.25
1
4
0.125 1 8
Bst vs Templiphi
R² = 0.13930.25
1
4
0.125 1 8
REPLI-g vs Templiphi
S6
FIG. S4. Scatter plot of Cy5/Cy3 ratio of biased genes in aDNA amplified by Bst in different technical replicates. DNA of Shenwanella oneidensis MR-1 was used as the template. The genes whose Cy5/Cy3 ratios in any replicates showed >1 fold are defined as biased genes. The results suggested that the bias produced by one MDA method would be reproducible.
R² = 0.965
0.25
1
4
0.25 1 4
Rep1 vsRep2
R² = 0.9679
0.25
1
4
0.25 1 4
Rep2 vsRep3