Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

22
FABIO MORREALE ANTONELLA DE ANGELI Evaluating Visitor Experiences With Interactive Art University of Trento Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science ICT Doctoral School

Transcript of Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

Page 1: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

FABIO MORREALEANTONELLA DE ANGELI

Evaluating Visitor ExperiencesWith Interactive Art

University of TrentoDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science

ICT Doctoral School

Page 2: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

interactive art

• The user has an active role in theproduction of the artwork

• The artist orchestrates the interaction,which is then performed by the audience

• Understanding UX is critical in this context

• Traditional HCI evaluation methodologiesdo not suffice

Page 3: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

T h e M u s i c Ro o m

Page 4: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

Identify an interactive metaphor that mediates musical intentionalities in a concrete domain

Page 5: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

musical intentionalities

emotions

affective character of music

Page 6: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

algorithmically generated classical

music

Page 7: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art
Page 8: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

a r c h i t e c t u r ev i s u a l t r a c k i n g s y s t e m

Page 9: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

architecture

Page 10: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art
Page 11: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art
Page 12: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

E VA LU AT I O N

interviews

questionnaires

log-data

video observations

Page 13: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

1- field observations

⇛ Number of visitors (85 + 87 couples = 344 visitors)

⇛ Long queues

⇛ Session length (5 minutes on average)

⇛ High perceived engagement

Page 14: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

2- video analysis

BEHAVIOURS % OF TIME % OF COUPLESWalking 36 96Couple dancing 17 76Individual dancing 11 56Running 10 82Standing still 8 100Playing run and chase game 6 64Lying down 3 7Jumping 2 47Pirouetting 2 32Intimate behaviours 2 32Lifting 1 16Fighting 0.5 28Twisting 0.5 28Bowing 0.4 16Stamping the ground 0.3 8Mimicking declaration of love 0.2 2

Examined the most recurring behaviours (N=50)

Page 15: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

2- video analysis

⇛ 30 videos⇛ 15 for each exhibition⇛ 10 M-M 10 M-F 10 F-F

⇛ 4 researchers to rate 1-3 collaboration and engagement

high

medium

low

high

medium

low

COLLABORATION ENGAGEMENT

Page 16: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

3- log data analysis

Page 17: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

3- log data analysis

⇛ Average and STD for distance and speed

⇛ High variation reported

⇛ Gender effect: M-F interacted closer and varied their speed less than M-M

Page 18: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

4- questionnaires

⇛ Participants received a card containing a link to an online questionnaire

⇛ Once completed, they could download the music they created

⇛ N = 64 (34%)

Page 19: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

Questionfactors loading

average

I enjoyed the installation .897 -.051

3.8I will recommend my friends to try this installation .801 -.362It was a stimulating creative experience .647 .312I liked the music inside the room .640 .153The music followed my and my partner’s movements .577 .377I would have preferred other musical genres -.022 .808

2.8The number of available movements to influence music were enough .126 .680

4- questionnaires

engagementmusic

Non-musicians reported a moreengaging experience

Page 20: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

5- interviews

⇛ I exhibition, 63 couples1. General experience2. Perception of control

following

controlling

⇛ II exhibition, 77 couples

1. Perception of control

following

controlling

both

Page 21: Evaluating Visitor Experiences with Interactive Art

discussions

⇛ Most of the visitors enjoyed the system

⇛ The enjoyment was due to differentpleasurable behaviours

⇛ A relevant percentage of visitors disregarded the meaning we attributed

⇛ Not simply a music-making installation