Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Products for Hydrological

16
Mekonnen Gebremichael, and Dawit Zeweldi Civil & Environmental Engineering Department University of Connecticut Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Products for Hydrological Applications

Transcript of Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Products for Hydrological

Mekonnen Gebremichael, and Dawit ZeweldiCivil & Environmental Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Connecticut

Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Products for Hydrological Applications

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 2

Outline

Introduction+ The Approach+ The Study Region

Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Products (PERSIANN)+ Performance Statistics

Evaluating Utility in Hydrological Applications+ A Blueprint

Conclusions

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 3

Two validation approaches:1. Evaluating against independent rainfall observations

2. Evaluating error propagation in hydrological applications

Introduction

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 4

Introduction

High-resolution satellite rainfall products analyzed: PERSIANN, CMORPH (to follow)

PERSIANN+ IR-PMW merged algorithm: Neural Network+ 4-km hourly over the United States

Validation Approach+ Evaluation against NEXRAD radar rainfall observations+ Evaluation in hydrological applications (to follow)

Study region+ Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma, USA+ Good quality NEXRAD data; subject of several major experiments (NASA,

USDA, etc.)

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 5

Area ~ 600 km2

Introduction: The Little Washita Watershed

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 6

Introduction: Inter-annual variability

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 7

Performance Statistics: 4-km, hourly time scale

Bias

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 8

Performance Statistics: watershed-averaged, hourly time scale

JJADJF

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 9

Performance Statistics: e-folding distance

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 10

Performance Statistics of the Largest Storm

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 11

Storm Duration Storm rainfall , mm E-folding distance:eP / eN

Peak Storm Rate:qP / qN

RMSEmm

Corr elati on

Beginning Ending NEXRAD PERSIANN

06/04/02:22 06/05/02:16 37.31 47.62 8.60 0.92 6.11 0.57

08/11/04:07 08/11/04:14 30.07 26.46 8.17 0.62 2.76 0.63

03/03/04:18 03/04/04:23 53.82 58.12 0.89 0.94 8.59 0.63

10/07/04:09 10/07/04:18 36.21 28.16 0.94 0.70 2.82 0.40

09/19/02:04 09/19/02:13 24.90 14.95 4.26 1.34 8.45 0.23

05/17/02:07 05//17/02:12 36.59 18.78 0.41 0.42 3.20 0.40

05/14/03:03 05/14/03:13 21.56 9.30 1.07 0.46 5.74 0.46

10/08/02:06 10/09/02:22 72.46 15.84 0.55 0.26 7.16 0.48

10/28/02:19 10/29/02:06 30.73 13.40 0.71 0.79 5.07 0.25

09/08/02:16 09/09/02:19 44.95 5.49 0.63 0.09 8.00 0.76

Performance Statistics of Storms

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 12

Performance Statistics: Scaling with Temporal Scale

38.0−∝TR

RMSE55.0−∝T

RRMSE

RRMSE

DJF JJA

What is the appropriate spaceWhat is the appropriate space--time scale?time scale?

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 13

Numerical simulations of catchment hydrologic processes require a method for representing a basin. Methods can be categorized as lumped versus distributed modeling (contours, grids, polygons, TINs).

Basin-Averaged Models (e.g. HEC-HMS)

Raster-Grid Models (e.g. MIKE SHE)

Which is the hydrologic model apt for the satellite rainfall obsWhich is the hydrologic model apt for the satellite rainfall observations?ervations?

versus

Predictive performance of hydrologic models as a function of model complexityand data availability (Grayson and Bloschl 2001).

Hydrological Application

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 14

SatelliteRainfall Products

Simulated Watershed Response

Satellite Rainfall Error PropagationHydrologic Model

ReferenceRainfall Products Hydrologic Model

Simulated Watershed Response

Observed Watershed Response Hydrologic

Model Error

Performance Statistics: A Blueprint for Hydrological Applications

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 15

Conclusions

Need for rigorous validation of high-resolution satellite rainfall products, at various space-time scales, for different regimes

Need for identifying hydrologic model complexity level apt for satellite- rainfall inputs, and sensitivity to space-time resolutions

Mekonnen GebremichaelUniversity of Connecticut 16

Thank you