European Transparency Project Progress Olaf Islei European Strategy and Environment 04 September...
-
Upload
shanon-parks -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of European Transparency Project Progress Olaf Islei European Strategy and Environment 04 September...
European Transparency Project Progress
Olaf IsleiEuropean Strategy and Environment
04 September 2008
2
NW Gas Regional Initiative
Regional Initiatives Started Spring 2006 Practical bottom up approach to reform Engage all stakeholders
North West Region Nine Members (+ Norway) Majority of European gas trade and consumption
Transparency One of three priority areas
1. Transparency 2. Capacity3. Investment
Objective: overcome barriers to gas trade between Member States on a non-discriminatory basis
3
Participating TSOs
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Germany Belgium
France Ireland
Sweden
Northern Ireland
Denmark
?
4
Context – original information wish list
Gas Quality
Gas Balancing
Transmission Capacity
Gas Flows
Supply and Demand
Agreed as priority areas
Important areas for
future focus
Gas Flows Daily flow and interruptions
Daily prompt allocations
Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations
Historic gas flows
Transmission Capacity Max technical capacity
Interruption probability
Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity
focus on prioritised subset of information
5
Interconnection Points
128 Interconnection Points
95 Public
33 Confidential (?)
Greater information transparency at “confidential” interconnection points?
EC Law: Less than three shippers; can request authorisation from NRAs not to publish information
3rd package amendment
IMPACT OF LESS THAN THREE SHIPPER RULE ON PROJECT
6
TSOs committed to milestones
7
Implementation schedule
Data Type% provided
in December 2007
% expected by May 2008
% expected by September
2008
% expected by December
2008 (C1) Max technical capacity
69 94 94 94
(C2) Interruption 31 50 81 88(C3) Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity
56 75 88 94
(F1) Daily flow / aggregated Allocation
25 75 94 100
(F2) Daily prompt allocation information
81 88 88 94
(F3) Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations
13 31 63 75
(F4) Historic gas flow information database
44 63 100 100
Example: 25% of TSOs already provided aggregate daily flow and interruptions (F1), by December 2008 100% of TSOs should provide this info
8
Implementation progress: May 2008
MIXED PROGRESS: ON TRACK IN 3 BUT BEHIND SCHEDULE ON 4
9
Max technical capacity (C1)
ALMOST ON TRACK: ONLY ONE TSO LEFT TO IMPLEMENT
Planned
Fluxys, BGE, Energinet.dk, Swedegas
Implemented
Fluxys, BGE, Energinet.dk
Delayed
Swedegas
10
Probability of interruption (C2)
BEHIND SCHEDULE: 6 TSOs TO IMPLEMENT BY SEPTEMBER
Planned
Ontras, Energinet.dk, Swedegas
Implemented
E.ON
Delayed
Ontras, Energinet.dk Swedegas
11
Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity (C3)
ROUGHLY ON TRACK: ONE TSO IMLPEMENTED EARLY ONE TSO FAILED
Planned
Fluxys, BGE, Energinet.dk
Implemented
NG, BGE, Energinet.dk
Delayed
Fluxys
12
Daily flow/aggregated allocation (D+1) (F1)
BEHIND SCHEDULE: 4 TSOs TO IMPLEMENT BY SEPTEMBER; 3 BY DECEMBER
Planned
E.ON, WINGAS, Ontras, Energinet.dk, BEB, DEP, Swedegas, GdF DT
Implemented
E.ON, BEB, DEP, GdF DT
Delayed
Fluxys, WINGAS, Ontras, Swedegas
13
Daily prompt allocation information (F2)
ON TRACK: ALL TSOs NOW REPORT TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION
Svenska Kraftnät and E.ON now report that
they provide this information
14
Daily aggregate day ahead nominations (F3)
BEHIND SCHEDULE: 3 TSOs PROVIDE NO ANSWER ON IMPLEMENTATION
Planned
WINGAS, Ontras, DEP
Implemented
E.ON
Delayed
WINGAS, Ontras, DEP
15
Historic gas flow database (F4)
ON TRACK: 5 TSOs STILL NEED TO IMPLEMENT THIS INFORMATION
Planned
WINGAS, Ontras, BEB
Implemented
E.ON, DEP, WINGAS, BEB
Delayed
Ontras
16
TSOs that report new information release
TSOs that report full compliance already
17
Key issues
Implementation accuracy1. At which interconnection points will the relevant data be
published?2. Are the definitions for each data type appropriate?3. Has there been any further progress since May?
User views1. Network user feedback on accessibility and usefulness of the
data2. Improvements to project management and reporting3. Any other key issues?
TSO feedback1. Reasons for delays in releasing new data2. Re-confirmation of implementation commitment
18
Next Steps
First implementation report and press release published:25 July 2008
Publication draft second progress report: 07 November 2008
North-West Region Stakeholder Conference in London: 14 November 2008
Deadline for implementation: 31 December 2008
Final project report/workshop:Early 2009
19
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
ERGEG WEBSITEhttp://www.energy-regulators.eu/portal/page/portal/EER_HOME
NW GRI WEBSITEhttp://www.energy-regulators.eu/portal/page/portal/EER_HOME/EER_INITIATIVES/GRI/North_West/Overview
DTe is the lead regulator for the NW Gas Regional Initiative - contact for participation/updates
http://www.dte.nl/nederlands/home/index.asp
Maya van der Steenhoven (Ms) [email protected] +31 70 330 3520Kristien van de Laar (Ms) [email protected] +31 70 330 3304 Erik Rakhou (Mr) [email protected] +31 70 330 1937
For further information
Olaf Islei (Mr) [email protected] Martinez (Mr) [email protected] Taylor (Ms) [email protected]
Download First Project Implementation Report
http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Europe/Whatwedo/RegionalInit/Documents1/Transparency%20implementation%20report.pdf
20