Euro money market survey, September 2015€¦ · Chart 12 Counterparty structure of various money...
Transcript of Euro money market survey, September 2015€¦ · Chart 12 Counterparty structure of various money...
Euro money market survey
September 2015
Contents
1 Breakdown, by country, of participating banks in 2015
1.1 Number of participating banks per country
2 Summary of cross-market analysis
2.1 Turnover analysis
2.2 Maturity analysis
2.3 Market structure
2.4 Qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
2.5 Perception of trading changes caused by changes to the risk limits in the reporting period
3 The unsecured market
3.1 Turnover analysis
3.2 Maturity analysis
3.3 Market structure
3.4 Qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
4 The secured market
4.1 Total secured market: turnover analysis
4.2 Total secured market: maturity analysis
4.3 Total secured market: market structure
4.4 Bilateral repos, including central counterparty (CCP) transactions: turnover analysis
4.5 Bilateral repos, including central counterparty (CCP) transactions: maturity analysis
4.6 Bilateral repos, including central counterparty (CCP) transactions: market structure
4.7 Triparty repos: turnover analysis
4.8 Triparty repos: maturity analysis
4.9 Total secured market: qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
Euro money market survey, September 2015 1
5 The short-term securities market
5.1 Turnover analysis in the secondary market
5.2 Qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
6 The over-the-counter derivatives market
6.1 Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives: turnover analysis
6.2 Overnight index swaps (OISs): turnover analysis
6.3 Overnight index swaps (OISs): qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
6.4 Other interest rate swaps (IRSs): turnover analysis
6.5 Other interest rate swaps (IRSs): qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
6.6 Forward rate agreements (FRAs): turnover analysis
6.7 Forward rate agreements (FRAs): qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
6.8 Foreign exchange (FX) swaps and forwards: turnover analysis
6.9 Foreign exchange (FX) swaps and forwards: qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
6.10 Cross-currency swaps (Xccy swaps): turnover analysis
6.11 Cross-currency swaps (Xccy swaps): qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
6.12 Options and futures: qualitative assessment and development of the market structure
Annexes
Annex 1 Credit institutions participating in the ECB’s 2015 Euro Money Market Survey
Annex 2 Coordination of the ECB’s 2015 Euro Money Market Survey
Euro money market survey, September 2015 2
1 BREAKDOWN, BY COUNTRY, OF PARTICIPATING BANKS IN 20151.1 NUMBER OF PARTICIPATING BANKS PER COUNTRY
Number of banks
BELGIUM 3
BULGARIA 3
CZECH REPUBLIC 6
DENMARK 1
GERMANY 16
ESTONIA 1
IRELAND 6
GREECE 5
SPAIN 11
FRANCE 9
ITALY 8
CYPRUS 2
LATVIA 3
LITHUANIA 3
LUXEMBOURG 2
HUNGARY 3
MALTA 5
NETHERLANDS 5
AUSTRIA 6
POLAND 11
PORTUGAL 10
ROMANIA 3
SLOVENIA 3
SLOVAKIA 2
FINLAND 2
SWEDEN 3
UNITED KINGDOM 15
SWITZERLAND 2
TOTAL 149
Note: A detailed list of participating banks can be found in Annex I. Countries are listed in Protocol order, i.e. the alphabetical order of the country names in the respective national language.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 3
2 SUMMARY OF CROSS-MARKET ANALYSIS2.1 TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 1 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the euro money market(EUR trillion)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
unsecuredsecured
OISsFX swaps
other IRSsXccy swaps
FRAsST securities
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 2 Breakdown, by segment, of cumulative quarterly turnover in the euro money market(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
unsecuredsecured
OISsFX swaps
other IRSsXccy swaps
FRAsST securities
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 4
Chart 3 Cumulative quarterly turnover in various money market segments(index: total segment volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
unsecured secured ST securities FX swaps
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 4 Cumulative quarterly turnover in various money market segments (index: total segment volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
other IRSs Xccy swaps FRAs OISs
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 5
2.2 MATURITY ANALYSIS
Chart 5 Maturity breakdown for various moneymarket segments in 2014
Chart 6 Maturity breakdown for various moneymarket segments in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Unsecured OISs FRAsSecured FX swaps
0
20
40
60
80
100
up to 1 week1 week to 1 month
1 to 3 months 3 to 6 months
6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year
0
20
40
60
80
100
Unsecured OISs FRAsSecured FX swaps
0
20
40
60
80
100
up to 1 week1 week to 1 month
1 to 3 months 3 to 6 months
6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 7 Maturity breakdown for various moneymarket segments in 2014
Chart 8 Maturity breakdown for various moneymarket segments in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Other IRSs Xccy swaps0
20
40
60
80
100
up to 1 year1 to 2 years
1 to 5 years 5 to 10 years
more than 10 years
0
20
40
60
80
100
Other IRSs Xccy swaps0
20
40
60
80
100
up to 1 year1 to 2 years
1 to 5 years 5 to 10 years
more than 10 years
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 6
2.3 MARKET STRUCTURE
Table 1 Concentration of unsecured market activity in 2015(percentages of total)
Lending Borrowing
Top 5 credit institutions 62.1 29.8 Top 10 credit institutions 81.0 47.7 Top 20 credit institutions 91.7 71.4
Table 2 Concentration of secured market activity in 2015(percentages of total)
Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral Triparty Triparty Total Totalreverse repos repos reverse repos, repos, reverse repos repos reverse repos repos
CCPs only CCPs only
Top 5 credit institutions 39.0 36.2 44.9 41.8 72.0 54.5 38.2 35.9 Top 10 credit institutions 62.5 60.3 70.6 69.5 90.3 87.9 61.2 59.1 Top 20 credit institutions 87.0 83.4 91.9 88.6 99.7 98.3 86.3 83.0
Table 3 Concentration of activity in OTC derivatives and short-term securities in 2015(percentages of total)
ST securities OISs Other IRSs FRAs FX swaps Xccy swaps
Top 5 credit institutions 50.9 54.9 77.7 72.8 37.6 61.6 Top 10 credit institutions 74.5 80.1 88.0 89.3 57.4 84.2 Top 20 credit institutions 92.3 95.4 96.0 99.3 84.1 95.3
Note: For Tables 1, 2 and 3, the panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 7
Chart 9 Lorenz curve: concentration of activity in various market segments in 2015(x axis: percentage of market participants; y axis: percentage of activity)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
unsecuredOISs
FRAsXccy swaps
securedFX swaps
other IRSsST securities
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 8
2.4 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MONEY MARKETSTRUCTURE
Chart 10 Is the euro money market (i.e. the differentsegments) efficient?
Chart 11 Has the market liquidity in the euro moneymarket changed with respect to last year?
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
not efficientlimitedly efficient
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
Unsecured
Repos
FX swaps
FRAs
OISs
other IRSs
Xccy swaps
ST-securities
Options
Futures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
has worsened significantlyhas worsened slightly
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
Unsecured
Repos
FX swaps
FRAs
OISs
Other IRSs
Xccy swaps
ST securities
Options
Futures
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 12 Counterparty structure of various moneymarket segments in 2015
Chart 13 Trading structure of various money marketsegments in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
nationaleuro area
other
Unsecured
Secured
FX swaps
FRAs
OISs
Other IRSs
Xccy swaps
ST securities
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Unsecured
Secured
FX swaps
FRAs
OISs
Other IRSs
Xccy swaps
ST securities
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 9
2.5 PERCEPTION OF TRADING CHANGES CAUSED BY CHANGES TO THE RISKLIMITS IN THE REPORTING PERIOD
Table 4 Perceived impact of limit changes on turnover(number of banks)
2014 2015
Will Will Will No opinion Total Will Will Will No opinion Totalcontract not change expand contract not change expand
Contracted 11 6 0 0 17 13 10 1 0 24 Has not changed 6 94 12 0 112 8 99 4 0 111 Expanded 1 4 12 0 17 1 3 6 0 10 No opinion 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 4
Total 18 104 24 3 149 22 112 11 4 149
Table 5 Perceived impact of limit changes on turnover(percentages of turnover reported)
2014 2015
Will Will Will No opinion Total Will Will Will No opinion Totalcontract not change expand contract not change expand
Contracted 3.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.4 2.7 0.0 0.0 6.0 Has not changed 6.3 76.2 1.9 0.0 84.4 2.6 83.4 0.1 0.0 86.1 Expanded 0.3 0.1 12.2 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 3.3 No opinion 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 4.6
Total 9.5 76.4 14.1 0.0 100.0 5.9 86.1 3.4 4.6 100.0
Table 6 Perceived impact of limit changes on the number of participants(number of banks)
2014 2015
Will Will Will No opinion Total Will Will Will No opinion Totalcontract not change expand contract not change expand
Contracted 11 9 1 0 21 13 13 1 0 27 Has not changed 6 89 15 0 110 6 97 7 0 110 Expanded 0 2 12 0 14 0 1 7 0 8 No opinion 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 4
Total 17 100 28 4 149 19 111 15 4 149
Table 7 Perceived impact of limit changes on the number of participants(percentages of turnover reported)
2014 2015
Will Will Will No opinion Total Will Will Will No opinion Totalcontract not change expand contract not change expand
Contracted 2.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 5.7 Has not changed 5.9 76.2 3.0 0.0 85.1 1.0 84.7 2.2 0.0 87.9 Expanded 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.8 No opinion 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 4.6
Total 8.3 76.4 15.3 0.0 100.0 4.0 87.5 4.0 4.6 100.0
Euro money market survey, September 2015 10
3 THE UNSECURED MARKET3.1 TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 14 Cumulative quarterly turnover in unsecured cash lending and borrowing(index: cash lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
lendingborrowing
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 11
3.2 MATURITY ANALYSIS
Chart 15 Cumulative quarterly turnover in unsecured cash lending(index: cash lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 16 Cumulative quarterly turnover in unsecured cash borrowing(index: cash borrowing volume in 2003 = 100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 12
Chart 17 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulativequarterly turnover in unsecured lending
Chart 18 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulativequarterly turnover in unsecured borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 19 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in unsecured lending
Chart 20 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in unsecured borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 13
3.3 MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 21 Breakdown, by geographical counterparty, ofthe unsecured market in 2014
Chart 22 Breakdown, by geographical counterparty, ofthe unsecured market in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
National (41.0%)
Euro area (37.6%)
Other (21.5%)
National (46.2%)
Euro area (32.3%)
Other (21.5%)
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 14
3.4 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 23 Is the unsecured market efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 24 Has the market liquidity in the unsecuredmarket changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficient significantly efficient extremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 25 Counterparty structure of unsecuredtransactions
Chart 26 Trading structure of unsecured transactions(percentages of total)
(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 15
4 THE SECURED MARKET4.1 TOTAL SECURED MARKET: TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 27 Cumulative quarterly turnover in secured cash lending and borrowing(index: cash lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
lendingborrowing
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 28 Breakdown of total secured market(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
bilateral bilateral repos, non-CCP transactions only (reporting started in 2009)bilateral repos, CCP transactions only (reporting started in 2009)triparty repos
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 16
4.2 TOTAL SECURED MARKET: MATURITY ANALYSIS
Chart 29 Cumulative quarterly turnover in secured cash lending(index: secured cash lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 30 Cumulative quarterly turnover in secured cash borrowing(index: secured cash borrowing volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 17
Chart 31 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulativequarterly turnover in secured lending
Chart 32 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulativequarterly turnover in secured borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 33 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in secured lending
Chart 34 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in secured borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 18
4.3 TOTAL SECURED MARKET: MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 35 Breakdown, by geographical counterparty,of the secured market in 2014
Chart 36 Breakdown, by geographical counterparty,of the secured market in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
National (23.5%)
Euro area (45.5%)
Other (31.0%)National (26.9%)
Euro area (39.4%)
Other (33.7%)
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 19
4.4 BILATERAL REPOS, INCLUDING CCP TRANSACTIONS: TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 37 Cumulative quarterly turnover in bilateral repo cash lending and borrowing(index: cash lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
lendingborrowing
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 20
Chart 38 Quarterly turnover in bilateral repo lending that is indexed to a floating rate(percentages of total volume in the maturity bucket)
0
5
10
15
20
0
5
10
15
20
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 39 Quarterly turnover in bilateral repo borrowing that is indexed to a floating rate(percentages of total volume in the maturity bucket)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 21
4.5 BILATERAL REPOS, INCLUDING CCP TRANSACTIONS: MATURITY ANALYSIS
Chart 40 Cumulative quarterly turnover in bilateral repo lending(index: bilateral repo lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 41 Cumulative quarterly turnover in bilateral repo borrowing(index: bilateral repo borrowing volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 22
Chart 42 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in bilateral repo lending
Chart 43 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulativequarterly turnover in bilateral repo borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2014 non-CCP 2014 CCP2015 non-CCP 2015 CCP
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2014 non-CCP 2014 CCP2015 non-CCP 2015 CCP
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 44 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in bilateral repo lending
Chart 45 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in bilateral repo borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2014 non-CCP 2014 CCP2015 non-CCP 2015 CCP
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2014 non-CCP 2014 CCP2015 non-CCP 2015 CCP
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 23
4.6 BILATERAL REPOS, INCLUDING CCP TRANSACTIONS: MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 46 Geographical breakdown of collateralin the bilateral repo market in 2014
Chart 47 Geographical breakdown of collateralin the bilateral repo market in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
National (34.4%)
Euro area (60.7%)
Other (4.9%)
National (33.0%)
Euro area (56.5%)
Other (10.5%)
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 48 Geographical breakdown of collateral in bilateral secured lending
Chart 49 Geographical breakdown of collateral inbilateral secured borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 24
4.7 TRIPARTY REPOS MARKET: TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 50 Cumulative quarterly turnover in triparty repo cash lending and borrowing(index: cash lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
lendingborrowing
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 25
4.8 TRIPARTY REPOS: MATURITY ANALYSIS
Chart 51 Cumulative quarterly turnover in triparty repo lending(index: triparty repo lending volume in 2003 = 100)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 52 Cumulative quarterly turnover in triparty repo borrowing(index: triparty repo borrowing volume in 2003 = 100)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
O/NT/N
S/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 26
Chart 53 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in triparty repo lending
Chart 54 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulativequarterly turnover in triparty repo borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 55 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in triparty repo lending
Chart 56 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulativequarterly turnover in triparty repo borrowing
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20142015
O/N T/N S/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 27
4.9 TOTAL SECURED MARKET: QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENTOF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 57 Is the secured market efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 58 Has the market liquidity in the securedmarket changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficient significantly efficient extremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 59 Counterparty structure of securedtransactions
Chart 60 Trading structure of secured transactions(percentages of total)
(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 28
5 THE SHORT-TERM SECURITIES MARKET5.1 THE SECONDARY MARKET FOR SHORT-TERM SECURITIES: TURNOVERANALYSIS
Chart 61 Cumulative quarterly turnover in outright transactions(index: outright transaction volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
government issuescredit institution issues
non-credit institution issues
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 29
5.2 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 62 Is the short-term securities market efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 63 Has the market liquidity for short-termsecurities changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 64 Counterparty structure of short-term securities transactions
Chart 65 Trading structure of short-term securitiestransactions
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 30
6 THE OVER-THE-COUNTER DERIVATIVES MARKET6.1 OVER-THE-COUNTER (OTC) DERIVATIVES: TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 66 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the various OTC derivatives market segments(index: OTC derivatives volume in 2003 = 100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
OISsFX swaps
other IRSsXccy swaps
FRAs
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 67 Breakdown, by segment, of total OTC derivatives market(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
OISsFX swaps
other IRSsXccy swaps
FRAs
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 31
6.2 OVERNIGHT INDEX SWAPS (OISs): TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 68 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the OIS segment(index: OIS volume in 2003 = 100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
less than 1 week1 week to 1 month
1 to 3 months3 to 6 months
6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 69 Maturity breakdown for cumulative quarterly turnover in the OIS segment(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
less than 1 week1 week to 1 month
1 to 3 months3 to 6 months
6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 32
Chart 70 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in the OIS segment(percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
20142015
Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 71 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulative quarterly turnover in the OIS segment(percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20142015
Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 33
6.3 OVERNIGHT INDEX SWAPS (OISs): QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT ANDDEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 72 Is the OIS segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 73 Has the market liquidity in the OIS segmentchanged with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 74 Counterparty structure of OIS transactions(percentages of total)
Chart 75 Trading structure of OIS transactions(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 34
6.4 OTHER INTEREST RATE SWAPS (IRSs): TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 76 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the IRS segment(index: IRS volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
up to 1 year1 to 2 years
2 to 5 years5 to 10 years
more than 10 years
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 77 Development of maturity breakdown of cumulative quarterly turnover in the IRS segment(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
up to 1 year1 to 2 years
2 to 5 years5 to 10 years
more than 10 years
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 35
Chart 78 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in the IRS segment(percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20142015
Up to1 year
1 to 2years
2 to 5years
5 to 10years
More than10 years
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 79 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulative quarterly turnover in the IRS segment(percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
20142015
Up to1 year
1 to 2years
2 to 5years
5 to 10years
More than10 years
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 36
6.5 OTHER INTEREST RATE SWAPS (IRSs): QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT ANDDEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 80 Is the other IRS segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 81 Has the market liquidity in the other IRSsegment changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 82 Counterparty structure of other IRS transactions
Chart 83 Trading structure of other IRS transactions(percentages of total)
(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 37
6.6 FORWARD RATE AGREEMENTS (FRAs): TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 84 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the FRA segment(index: FRA volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
less than 1 week1 week to 1 month
1 to 3 months3 to 6 months
6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 85 Development of the maturity breakdown of the cumulative quarterly turnover in the FRA segment(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
less than 1 week1 week to 1 month
1 to 3 months3 to 6 months
6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 38
Chart 86 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in the FRA segment(percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
20142015
Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 87 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulative quarterly turnover in the FRA segment(percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
20142015
Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 39
6.7 FORWARD RATE AGREEMENTS (FRAs): QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT ANDDEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 88 Is the FRA segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 89 Has the market liquidity in the FRA segmentchanged with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 90 Counterparty structure of FRA transactions(percentages of total)
Chart 91 Trading structure of FRA transactions(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 40
6.8 FOREIGN EXCHANGE (FX) SWAPS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE (FX) FORWARDS:TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 92 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the FX swaps and forwards segment(index: FX swaps volume in 2003 = 100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
O/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 93 Development of maturity breakdown for cumulative quarterly turnover in the FX swaps and forwardssegment(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
O/Nless than 1 week
1 week to 1 month1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months6 months to 1 year
more than 1 year
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 41
Chart 94 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in the FX swaps and forwards segment(percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
20142015
O/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 95 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulative quarterly turnover in the FX swaps and forwards segment(percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20142015
O/N Lessthan
1 week
1 weekto 1
month
1 to 3months
3 to 6months
6 monthsto
1 year
Morethan
1 year
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 42
Chart 96 Breakdown, by currency, of transactions inthe FX swaps and forwards segment in 2014
Chart 97 Breakdown, by currency, of transactions inthe FX swaps and forwards segment in 2015
(percentages of total) (percentages of total)
EUR/USD (82.4%)
EUR/CHF (3.7%)
EUR/JPY (1.5%)
EUR/GBP (5.9%)
Other (6.4%)
EUR/USD (82.7%)
EUR/CHF (2.8%)EUR/JPY (1.4%)
EUR/GBP (6.2%)
Other (6.9%)
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 43
6.9 FOREIGN EXCHANGE (FX) SWAPS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE (FX) FORWARDS:QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 98 Is the FX swaps segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 99 Has the market liquidity in the FX swapssegment changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 100 Counterparty structure of FX swaptransactions
Chart 101 Trading structure of FX swap transactions(percentages of total)
(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 44
6.10 CROSS-CURRENCY SWAPS (Xccy swaps): TURNOVER ANALYSIS
Chart 102 Cumulative quarterly turnover in the Xccy swaps segment(index: Xccy swaps volume in 2003 = 100)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
50
100
150
200
250
300
up to 1 year1 to 2 years
2 to 5 years5 to 10 years
more than 10 years
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 103 Development of maturity breakdown for cumulative quarterly turnover in the Xccy swaps segment(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
20
40
60
80
100
up to 1 year1 to 2 years
2 to 5 years5 to 10 years
more than 10 years
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 45
Chart 104 Breakdown, by maturity, of cumulative quarterly turnover in the Xccy swaps segment(percentages of total)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
20142015
Up to1 year
1 to 2years
2 to 5years
5 to 10years
More than10 years
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Chart 105 Maturity-weighted breakdown of cumulative quarterly turnover in the Xccy swaps segment(percentages of total)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
20142015
Up to1 year
1 to 2years
2 to 5years
5 to 10years
More than10 years
Note: The panel comprised 149 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 46
6.11 CROSS-CURRENCY SWAPS (Xccy swaps): QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT ANDDEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 106 Is the Xccy swaps segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 107 Has the market liquidity in the Xccy swapssegment changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 108 Counterparty structure of Xccy swap transactions
Chart 109 Trading structure of Xccy swap transactions(percentages of total)
(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
nationaleuro area
other
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
direct tradingvoice broker
electronic trading
Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 47
6.12 OPTIONS AND FUTURES: QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENTOF THE MARKET STRUCTURE
Chart 110 Is the options segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 111 Has the market liquidity in the optionssegment changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a.0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
n.a.n.a. n.a. n.a.
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Chart 112 Is the futures segment efficient?(percentages of total)
Chart 113 Has the market liquidity in the futuressegment changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
limitedly and not efficient
not efficient* limitedly efficient*
sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
20
40
60
80
100
has worsened
significantly* slightly*
has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly
* Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 98 credit institutions.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 48
Annex 1 Credit institutions participating in the ECB’s 2015 euro money market survey
BE Belfius Banque S.A.
BE BNP Paribas Fortis S.A.
BE KBC Bank N.V.
BG DSK Bank
BG Eurobank Bulgaria
BG United Bulgarian Bank
CZ Česká spořitelna, a. s.
CZ Československá obchodní banka, a.s.
CZ Citibank Europe plc
CZ HSBC Bank plc
CZ ING Bank N.V.
CZ Komerční banka, a. s.
DK Danske Bank A/S
DE Bayern LB
DE BHF-BANK AG
DE Commerzbank AG
DE DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale
DE Deutsche Bank AG
DE Deutsche Postbank AG
DE DZ BANK AG
DE Hamburger Sparkasse AG
DE HSH Nordbank AG
DE Landesbank Baden-Württemberg
DE Landesbank Berlin AG
DE Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale
DE Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank
DE SEB AG
DE UniCredit Bank AG
DE WGZ BANK AG
EE AS LHV Pank
IE Allied Irish Banks plc
IE Permanent TSB plc
IE Rabobank Ireland plc
IE The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland
IE Ulster Bank Ireland Limited
IE UniCredit Bank Ireland plc
GR Alpha Bank S.A.
GR Eurobank Ergasias S.A.
GR HSBC Bank plc
GR National Bank of Greece S.A.
GR Piraeus Bank S.A.
ES Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA)
ES Banco Cooperativo Español S.A.
ES Banco de Sabadell S.A.
ES Banco Popular Español S.A.
ES Banco Santander S.A.
ES Bankia S.A.
ES Bankinter S.A.
ES CaixaBank S.A.
ES Catalunya Banc S.A.
ES Cecabank S.A.
ES ING Bank, N.V. S.E
FR BNP Paribas
Euro money market survey, September 2015 49
FR BPCE
FR Bred - Banque Populaire
FR Crédit Agricole CIB
FR Crédit Agricole S.A.
FR Crédit Industriel et Commercial - CIC
FR HSBC France
FR Natixis
FR Société Générale
IT Banca IMI Spa
IT Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena Spa
IT Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Spa (BNL)
IT BNP Paribas S.A.
IT Dexia Crediop Spa
IT Intesa Sanpaolo Spa
IT UBI Banca (Unione di Banche Italiane Scpa)
IT UniCredit Spa
CY Bank of Cyprus Public Company Ltd
CY Hellenic Bank Public Company Ltd
LV AS Rietumu Banka
LV AS SEB banka
LV AS Swedbank
LT AB Citadele bankas
LT AB DNB bankas
LT AB SEB bankas
LU Banque et Caisse d'Epargne de l'Etat, Luxembourg
LU KBL European Private Bankers S.A.
HU ING Bank N.V. Magyarországi Fióktelepe
HU K and H Bank Zrt.
HU UniCredit Bank Hungary Zrt.
MT Akbank TAS
MT Bank of Valletta plc
MT FIMBANK plc
MT HSBC Bank Malta plc
MT Mediterranean Bank plc
NL ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
NL Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten N.V.
NL Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank)
NL F. van Lanschot Bankiers N.V.
NL ING Bank N.V.
AT Allgemeine Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank AG
AT Erste Group Bank AG
AT Oberbank AG
AT Raiffeisen Bank International AG
AT Raiffeisenlandesbank Niederösterreich-Wien AG
AT Raiffeisen-Landesbank Steiermark AG
PL Bank BPH S.A.
PL Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A.
PL Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A. (Bank Pekao S.A.)
PL Bank Zachodni WBK S.A.
PL Deutsche Bank Polska S.A.
PL Getin Noble Bank S.A.
PL ING Bank Śląski S.A.
PL Plus Bank S.A.
PL Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. (PKO BP)
PL Raiffeisen Bank Polska S.A.
PL Societe Generale S.A. Oddział w Polsce
PT Banco BIC Português SA
PT Banco BPI SA
PT Banco Comercial Português SA
PT Banco Finantia SA
Euro money market survey, September 2015 50
PT Banco Santander Totta SA
PT BANIF-Banco Internacional do Funchal SA
PT Caixa Central - Caixa Central de Crédito Agrícola Mútuo, CRL
PT Caixa Económica Montepio Geral
PT Caixa Geral de Depósitos SA
PT Novo Banco, SA
RO Banca Comerciala Romana S.A.
RO BRD - Groupe Societe Generale S.A.
RO The Royal Bank of Scotland pls Edinburgh, - Sucursala Romania
SI Abanka Vipa d.d.
SI Nova Ljubljanska Banka d.d., Ljubljana
SI SID - Slovenska izvozna in razvojna banka, d.d., Ljubljana
SK Československá obchodná banka, a.s.
SK Slovenská sporiteľňa, a.s.
FI Nordea Bank Finland Abp
FI Pohjola Pankki Oyj
SE Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (SEB)
SE Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)
SE Swedbank AB (publ)
UK Abbey National Treasury Services plc
UK Banco do Brasil SA
UK Barclays Bank plc
UK BNP Paribas
UK Citibank NA
UK Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
UK Credit Suisse
UK Deutsche Bank AG
UK HSBC Bank plc
UK JP Morgan Chase Bank
UK Lloyds TSB Bank plc
UK Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited
UK Novo Banco S.A. - London Branch
UK Standard Bank plc
UK The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
CH UBS AG
CH Zürcher Kantonalbank AG (ZKB)
Euro money market survey, September 2015 51
Annex 2 Coordination of the ECB’s 2015 euro money market survey
The ECB’s 2015 Euro Money Market Survey was conducted by a working group, comprising staff members from the ECB and the national central banks, which reported to the Market Operations Committee of the European System of Central Banks.
Euro money market survey, September 2015 52
Abbreviations Countries BE Belgium BG Bulgaria CZ Czech Republic DK Denmark DE Germany EE Estonia IE Ireland GR Greece ES Spain FR France
IT Italy CY Cyprus LV Latvia LT Lithuania LU Luxembourg HU Hungary MT Malta NL Netherlands AT Austria PL Poland
PT Portugal RO Romania SI Slovenia SK Slovakia FI Finland SE Sweden UK United Kingdom CH Switzerland
In Charts CCP central counterparty FRAs forward rate agreements FX swaps foreign exchange swaps Other IRSs other interest rate swaps OISs overnight index swaps O/N overnight OTC over the counter T/N tomorrow/next (day) S/N spot/next (day) ST securities short-term securities Xccy swaps cross-currency swaps Note: The data represented herein refer to the second quarter of the respective year.
© European Central Bank, 2015
Postal address 60640 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Telephone +49 69 1344 0 Website www.ecb.europa.eu
All rights reserved. Any reproduction, publication and reprint in the form of a different publication, whether printed or produced electronically, in whole or in part, is permitted only with the explicit written authorisation of the ECB.
ISSN 1830-7000 (online) ISBN 978-92-899-1949-4 DOI 10.2866/353256 EU catalogue No QB-YE-15-001-EN-N