Euro-Asian Submarine Cables An overview - MENOG · Euro-Asian Submarine Cables An overview. 2...
Transcript of Euro-Asian Submarine Cables An overview - MENOG · Euro-Asian Submarine Cables An overview. 2...
Beirut, October 25th-29th 2009
|Giuseppe Valentino|DirectorProduct Management IP & Data ServicesTelecom Italia Sparkle
MENOG 5
Euro-Asian Submarine CablesAn overview
2
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Agenda
The growth of demand in the mid term scenarioTypes of submarine cables
Building blocks of multi-owner systems: The C&MA
Restoration and Protection of submarine CablesA real case: cable cut emergency on Jan 30, 2008
The upgrades
Submarine Cable Systems in the Med BasinTelecom Italia Sparkle network assets
New Cable projects in the Euro-Asia-East Africa region
3
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
The growth of demand in the mid term scenarioSeveral new systems are lining up
In the next 2 years, a number of new submarinesystems is expected to come to life: interestedroutes are primarily India to Europe and TransPacific. All the main regional players and most ofEuropean and US carriers are involved in theseprojects.
Telegeography
4
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Investments in Submarine Cable Systems
Source: TeleGeography Research © 2008 PriMetrica, Inc.
Bil.USD
5
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Submarine cable types (1)
Submarine cables have different shapes:• simple, little, point-to-point segments
• long, multi-legged and spurred complexes
• simple rings
• Clouds of festoons
Submarine cables have different parenthoods:• Private cables, owned by one single company
• Bilateral cables, owned by the two landing parties
• Consortium cables, where a number of carriers joinforces in the project
6
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Submarine cable types (2) Consortium cables: one system, several owners
• The optical layer is common and undivided between Parties
• Ownership is proportional to investment in the system
• The SDH layer is individually used by Parties
Complexity means flexibility means complexity!• Capacity usage can vary:
• in size
• in topology
• from time to time
7
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Building blocks of multi-owner systems: the Construction andMaintenance Agreement (C&MA)
Cable System Configuration & Description.
System Ready For Service Date and Duration of the C&MA.
Ownership of Segments.
Cable Management Structure.
Acquisition and Use of Capacity.
Increase of Capacity – Upgrades.
Allocation of Operation and Maintenance Costs.
Ownership & Capacity Activation Schedules.
8
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Restoration of Submarine Cables
Only few systems have a ring based architectureand are therefore self-protected
Most systems have “fishbone” architecture!
The strategy: join forces with other cables withsimilar path Restoration is between Landing Stations
The MARA (Mutual Aid Restoration Agreement) This service is not for free!
9
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5Restoration: An example
SAT-3/WASC/SAFESMW-4
Here is SMW-4,looking for
alternative routingin case of failures
And here is SAT-3/WASC/SAFE, thatmay offer some
alternative routing
10
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5Restoration: Another example
SAT-3/WASC/SAFESMW-4SMW-3
11
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Protection: Automatic Restoration
Restoration traditionally means manual activation, on event, of pre-planned routing plans
Optimization of spare resources, combination of multiple restorationplans for multiple cable systems
Automatic Restoration (equivalent to Protection on terrestrial networks)has been introduced
• SMW-3 and SMW-4 have implemented some SNCP protection between anypair on corresponding Landing Station
• Terrestrial interlinks, whenever necessary, have been provisioned and fullydedicated to complete the infrastructure
Service continuity is becoming a must also in submarine cables!
12
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
COLUMBUS III
Rome
EGYPT
TURKEY
CYPRUSYeroskipos
Chania
GREECE
Mazara
ITALY
Palermo
ISRAEL
Marmaris
SMW4
LIBYA
Catania
Fault
SMW3
FLAG-FEA
Alexandria
TIS PAN EUROPEAN BACKBONEFLAG Euro-Asia (FEA)SMW-4SMW-3TIS POPLANDING STATION Suez
Port Said
Two cable cuts occurred about 10 Km out of Alexandria, Egypt coast, causingsevere service disruption to Carriers and Service Providers relying upon eitherFLAG-FEA and SMW-4
A real case: cable cut emergency on Jan 30, 2008
TI Sparkle Global IP / Data Sales
13
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Analysts and media reportInternet connectivity isimpacted as severely as:
- 75% in Egypt and Pakistan- 50% in Emirates- 50% in Saudi Arabia- 10% in India
A real case: cable cut emergency on Jan 30, 2008
14
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
IP impacts of cable cut Jan ‘08: lost of Prefixes
Università di Roma 3, RIPE NCC: Fiber Cut Jan 08, Analysis of Network Dynamics - March 2008
15
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
On Jan 30th:- pick of AS PathChanges (green)
- drop of DistinctAS Paths (blu)
Regional ASPaths turbulenceuntil repairs arecompleted
Università di Roma 3, RIPE NCC: Analysis of Network Dynamics-March 2008
IP impacts of cable cut Jan ‘08: AS Paths turbulence
16
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Università di Roma 3, RIPE NCC: Analysis of Network Dynamics-March 2008
IP impacts of cable cut Jan ‘08: AS Paths Length (red)
Conclusions:- Unreachablenetworks- Increasedlatency andcongestion- Routingtopology entropy- BGP instability
17
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5Cable cut Jan 30, 2008: Sparkle rescue plan to Europe andSingapore
SMW - 3
TIS POPLANDING STATION
TIS PAN EUROPEAN BACKBONE
SMW - 4
FLAGTW-1
Alexandria
Mazara
Palermo
Suez
YeroskiposChania
SMW 3
SMW 4
Marmaris
Jeddah
Djibouti
Fujairah
Muscat
Colombo
Mumbai
KarachiTW-1
Chennai
Taipa
Danang
Tuas
PenangSatun
MedanMersing
Ancol
Pyapong
Mt Lavinia
Tungku
Bizerte
Cochin
Cox’s Bazar
Melaka
Marseilles
Roma
Milano
FLAG
TI Sparkle implemented in 24h some25 Gbps of capacity to rescue someMEA and Asian carriers’ networksheavily impacted by the cable cut
18
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
The Upgrades (1)
Submarine cable systems lifetime is today 15/20 years
In this period the system is subject to several “development” activities:• Increase in capacity• Technical enhancements
Upgrading a multi-owner system cable requires many decisions, to beagreed between all Parties
• Participation /Funding• Technical design• Planning• Capacity distribution
19
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
The Upgrades (2)
Not a “potential” development, but a significant part of the life of asubmarine cable system
• Upgrades in today systems take place in the first 4 to 5 years from RFS
Upgrades costs are clearly lower than initial investment• Not an off-shore activity!• Only specific parts of a system are normally involved
This impacts on Parties Business Plans• any co-owner must preserve its cost efficiency and market competitiveness
20
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
An example: History of upgrades on SMW-4Demand of connectivity from South East Asia, India and the Gulf is strong:since its RFS in Nov. 2005, SMW-4 increases in capacity every year andhalf
Capacity available in 2years doubles the
initial value
SMW-4 has advanceddiscussions on the next
upgrade!!
21
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Istanbul
Haifa
Tel Aviv
Tripoli
Alexandria
Athens
Marmaris
Chania
Corfù
Durres
Bar
Bari
Otranto
Tartous
Tripoli
Annaba BizerteKelibia
Algeri
Las Palmas
Tetouan
Sesimbra Valencia
Marseille
Barcelona
Malta
Penmarch
Goonhilly
PalermoCatania
Mazara
Suez
Pentaskinos
Columbus III
Italy-Libya SMW-4
IMEWESMW-3
MED
Savona
ALPAL-2
Italy-Tunisia
Italy-Albania
ALETAR
LEV
Italy-Malta
Otranto-Corfù-Bar
Submarine Cable Systems in the Med Basin
• 3 intercontinental existing systems: 24,500 route km in the basin, 16 Tbit/s design capacity
• 13 major intra-regional existing systems: 28,000 route km, 29 Tbit/s design capacity
22
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
TIS European and Mediterranean BackboneTI Sparkle Mediterranean backbone
SPAIN
Barcelona
Ses Covetes
ALGERIA
Ibiza
Rome
Savona
London
Madrid
New YorkNewark
Palma
El Djemila(Algiers)
Marseille
PORTUGAL
Sesimbra
MOROCCO
Tetouan
UNITEDKINGDOM
FRANCE
Penmarch
Goonhilly
Norden
AlexandriaSuez
EGYPT
TURKEY
Marmaris
CYPRUSYeroskiposChania
GREECE
Cairo
Djibouti
SMW 3
SMW 3
Miami
COLUMBUS III
Mazara
PENBAL
ALPAL 2
AnnabaBizerte
Jeddah
SMW 4
SMW 4
TUNISIA
BAR-SAV ITALY
Milan
Paris
FrankfurtBrussels
Zurich
Vienna
Hamburg
Lyon
Oostende GERMANY
Bordeaux
Bratislava
Prague
Munich
Warsaw
DusseldorfAmsterdam
Strasbourg/Kehl
Bilbao
AC-1,Apollo,FA-1,Yellow
FA-1,TYCO
ValenciaPalermo
ISRAEL
Turin
Tel Aviv
Haifa
MED
Istanbul
Athens
LEVTripoli
LIBYA
Birkirkara
Catania
KEL-TRA
Trapani
Kelibia
TIS SUBMARINE CABLE SYSTEMS
TIS POP
LANDING STATION
TIS PAN EUROPEAN BACKBONE
Fortaleza
ATLANTIS2
Lisbon
TripoliLebanon
Pt.Said
IMEWE
IMEWE Planned Jan. 2010
BARI-DURRES
MESTRE-UMAG
23
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Mt LaviniaCochin
Mumbai
KarachiFujairah
Norden
OstendGoonhilly
Penmarch
Sesimbra
TetouanMazaraChania Marmaris
Yeroskipos
Alexandria Suez
Jeddah
Djibouti City
Muscat
SatunPenang
TuasMersing
Jakarta
Perth
Tungku
Batangas
Okinawa
Keoje
Shanghai
Da Nang
TaipaDeep Water Bay
Shantou
Fangshan
Taucheng
Pyapon
Medan
Pakistan
Djibouti
Morocco
Portugal
France
UK
Germany
Belgium
Italy
Egypt Egypt
Cyprus
Greece Turkey
Saudi Arabia Oman
UAE
India
India
Sri Lanka Indonesia
Indonesia
Singapore
Malaysia Brunei
Thailand
Myanmar Vietnam
Philippines
Australia
Macau
Hong Kong
China
Taiwan
Taiwan
Japan
China
South Korea
Middle East & South East Asia Backbone (SMW3 & SMW4)
Chennai
Colombo
Marseille
Annaba Bizerte
Palermo
Melaka
Cox’s Bazar
France
Algeria Tunisia
Bangladesh
India
24
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Map
Abidjan
Cotonau
MAURITIUS
Dakar
Canary Is.
Lagos
Douala
Cacuaco
CapeTown(Melkbosstrand)
Durban
Libreville
Accra
Sesimbra
REUNION
Cochin
El Djemila
Valencia
AnnabaKelibia
TrapaniMazara
Palermo
Bizerte
Alexandria
TetouanChania
MarmarisYeroskipos
Suez
Djibouti City
Jeddah
Fujairah
Karachi
Mumbai
Colombo
Muscat
Mt Lavinia
TIS POPLANDING STATION
SAFESMW-3SMW-4TRA-KELAL-PAL / PEN-BALMAZ-TRI
SAT-3Lisbon
to Fortaleza
ATLANTIS-2
Tripoli
Africa
25
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Multiple protected rings on a combination of Flag Atlantic, Yellow, Apollo and TYCO
Additional connectivity to Miami on Columbus III at STM-1 level
MazaraCatania
Vienna
Frankfurt
HamburgAmsterdamLondon
Brussels
ZurichLyon
Barcelona
Madrid
Milan
Annaba
Flag AtlanticTYCO
Columbus 3
Flag Atlantic /Yellow /
Apollo /AC 1
Palermo
Rome
Prague
Bratislava
Warsaw
Dusseldorf
Marseille
Valencia
BilbaoBordeaux
Bizerte
New York 1
New York 2
Miami
Paris
Turin
Basel
Newark
TIS SUBMARINE CABLE SYSTEMS
TIS BACKBONE
TIS POPLANDING STATION
IP BACKBONE
Munich
Nuremberg
Palo Alto
Los Angeles
Chicago
DallasAtlanta
Ashburn
Transatlantic Backbone
26
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Data Center in Miami, NAP ofthe Americas
POP:
Rio de Janeiro
S. Paulo (2)
Buenos Aires (2)
La Paz
Santiago de Chile
Lima
Panama City
Caracas
Rio de Janeiro
New York
St. Croix
Fortaleza
Buenos Aires
La Paz
Santiago
Lurìn
Panama City
Sao Paulo
Caracas
MACMAC
SACSACSACSAC
Lima
TIS SUBMARINE CABLE SYSTEMSBACKBONESUBMARINE CABLE SYSTEMSTIS POPLANDING STATION
Latam Backbone
27
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
TI Sparkle next move
TI Sparkle promoted IMEWE, India, Middle East, Western Europe, a systemlaunched on Feb.5, 2008, with an official signature ceremony in Rome, by the 9carriers joining the project:
TIS (Italy), FT (France),TE (Egypt), Ogero (Lebanon),STC (Saudi Arabia), Etisalat (UAE),PTCL (Pakistan), VSNL/TATA TelecomBharti Airtel (India)RFS of the system is expected in January 2010.
In 2010 IMEWE will be one of the very few cable of new generation (most likelytwo) serving the route India-Europe.
IMEWE will not simply upgrade or compete with systems that already exist; it willextend capacity to under-served and developing markets as well as tocomplement existing infrastructure with physically diverse paths.
28
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
Fujairah
UAE
Karachi
PAKISTAN
Mumbai
INDIASAUDI ARABIA
Jeddah
LEBANON
AlexandriaSuez
FRANCE
Marseille
ITALY
Catania
Segment S1Segment S3Segment S2
EGYPT
Pt. Said
1
2
Tripoli
IMEWE - ConfigurationMax Ultimate Capacity: 3.84 Tbps
Initial Equipage: 260 Gbps
29
|Giuseppe Valentino|MENOG 5
REGION IMEWE MENA SEACOMTE NORTH EIG HAWK EASSy
ASIA
GULF
COUNTRYPakistanIndiaUAEOmanSaudi ArabiaLebanonSyriaEgyptTurkeyGreeceCyprusLibyaMaltaItalyFranceMonacoGibraltarPortugalUKSudanDjiboutiSomaliaKenyaTanzaniaMozambiqueMadagascarSouth Africa
MEDBASIN
EASTAFRICA
Estimated RFS Q1’10 Q2 ’10 Q2’10 Q2’10 Q3’10 Q3’10
▲▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲▲▲
▲▲▲
∆▲∆
▲∆∆▲▲
▲
▲
▲▲▲▲
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
▲
▲▲▲▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
∆
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
Source: TIS
New Cable projects in the Euro-Asia-East Africa region