EU MONITORING AND REPORTING GUIDELINES STAKEHOLDER DAY Cologne, 12th May 2005 UK APPROACH: PAST...
-
Upload
bernard-stewart -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of EU MONITORING AND REPORTING GUIDELINES STAKEHOLDER DAY Cologne, 12th May 2005 UK APPROACH: PAST...
EU MONITORING AND REPORTING GUIDELINES STAKEHOLDER DAY
Cologne, 12th May 2005
UK APPROACH: PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE
Dr Rob Gemmill
Technical Adviser
Monitoring & Assessment Process Management
Objectives
To indicate:� Approach taken in the UK � Things that have worked well - successes� Issues arising and going forward � Permit conditions to gain maximum benefit from
verification� Challenges for the MRG Review
UK Regulatory Timetable� Directive (2003/87/EEC): October 2003� UK GHG Emissions Trading Scheme
Regulations entered into force 31.12.03� Commission Decision establishing guidelines for
M&R of GHG Emissions 29.01.04� 1,100 Permits issued by 31.03.04� Re-issue of 1,100 permits including approved
M&R plans by 31.12.04� Re-issue of Consolidated Regulations 2005
Successes (Permitting 1)� Time-scales met including notifications regarding
>500kt CO2 installations
� M&R Guidelines (Commission Decision)� Well established communications between
Government, Regulators, Verifiers and Industry (consultation/workshops)
� Dedicated “National Once Task and Finish Groups” established to deliver
� Lean approach - costs kept down
Successes (Permitting 2)� Electronic application and permitting system
(England and Wales)� Standard forms and templates provided� Helpdesks and websites for queries and
products/guidance� [email protected]� [email protected]� www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/
trading/eu/index.htm
� Baseline Verification
Successes (Communications)� European - WG3, IETA, Member State led projects/liaisons� UK Emissions Trading Group - SG3 (Verification), SG7
(Permitting and Data)� Competent Authority/Regulator Meetings� MRV Group� Workshops for industry
CCC - CENTRAL CO-ORDINATION CRUCIAL
Location of M&R Products
Competent Authority websites
Environment Agency: http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/
emissionstrading
Select: “What operators need to do”, “Apply for a permit”, “Get an application form”
Website Products: Summary� Permit application forms, examples and guidance� M&R Guidelines (Commission Decision)� Guide to the Guidelines� Monitoring & Reporting Plan Template� Guidance to Completing the M&R Template� Exemplar M&R Plans � M&R Protocols� Uncertainty Paper� Frequently asked Questions and Answers
Issues Arising 1 (Combustion)� Scope of installation/activity
� “Processes”/emissions included� Aggregation and no “de minimus”
� Fuel supply complications (natural gas) � Compliance difficulties - limited scope for “no-tier”
� Country-specific or IPCC factors not always available
� Meter upgrade/installation not always technically feasible or reasonable cost
Issues Arising 2 (Combustion)� Input metering requirement - back-calculation/
modelling not allowed (even for 100% biomass combustion)
� Meter accuracy or uncertainty analysis requirement
� Meter calibrations (Section 7.2 requirements)� Representative sampling guidance limited� Net CV reporting requirement� Representative sampling of some fuels not
practical, e.g. tyres (standard European factor?)
Issues Arising 3 (Combustion)� ISO17025
� Section 10: Mandatory top tier requirement for laboratory services
� Waste of non-accredited installation-specific data (counter to the MRG accuracy principle)
� Big drop between top and next tier� Appropriateness of country-specific factors
� MRG definition inflexible� Baseline versus permitted discrepancy
Issues Going Forward� Interface with verifiers� Confidence in the verification process� Standard and electronic reporting template� Improvement to monitoring methodologies� What is good practice? - IMPEL project� Commission MRV review� Frequently asked questions� Phase 2 (NAP by June 2006)
Relationship with Verification (1)
Permit definition� "Verifier" means a verification body accredited to
carry out the verification requirements of Article 15 of the Directive and, in this context, “accredited” means accredited by a member of the ‘European Co-operation for Accreditation’ having regard to the latter’s greenhouse gas verification guidance
Relationship with Verification (2)
Planned permit condition� The Operator shall submit a report to the
Regulator, by 30 June each year, identifying all the potential improvements, in monitoring and reporting, identified by the Verifiers during the previous year. This report shall include the Operator’s proposals for implementing the identified improvements or justify why the improvements are not to be made
MRG Review Challenges 1
Further promote consistency/level playing field:� Remove confusion over uncertainty/accuracy� Confirm ISO17025 requirements (position on use
of non-accredited installation-specific data)� Extend indication of acceptable Section 10
sampling methods, and what is representative � Clarify Section 7.2 requirements/responsibilities� Further define “representative sampling”, “batch”,
“country-specific factors”, “minor/no-tier sources”, “verification requirements”, etc.
MRG Review Challenges 2
Reduce disproportionate burdens:� Set a combustion activity de minimis via the MRG� Allow overall-installation uncertainty compliance� Provide small emitters greater protection from
disproportionate implementation/running costs � Accommodate alternatives to metering� Modify discretion for “no tier” compliance - change
to a cost-based as well as emission-proportion consideration
Conclusions
� Excellent progress made on permitting� Effective communications established and
products published� Seeking added feedback from verification� Support harmonization initiatives� Issues arising need to be shared across the EU
quickly - MRG review is not soon enough
EU MONITORING AND REPORTING GUIDELINES STAKEHOLDER DAY
Cologne, 12th May 2005
UK APPROACH: PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE
Dr Rob Gemmill
Technical Adviser
Monitoring & Assessment Process Management