ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

5
ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum PSO 2009

description

ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum. PSO 2009. St. Lawrence R. Elbe River. Hudson R. Chesapeake Bay. Gironde River. Columbia R. San Francisco Bay. Estuarine Turbidity Maximum (ETM). Depth. River. Ocean. 5. 10. May 2,1998. 15. 5. 10. May 17,1999. 15. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

Page 1: ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

PSO 2009

Page 2: ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

Chesapeake Bay

Hudson R.

Elbe RiverSt. Lawrence R.

Gironde River

San Francisco BayColumbia R.

Dep

th

River Ocean

Estuarine Turbidity Maximum (ETM)

Page 3: ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

Dep

th (m

) 15

10

5

May 2,1998

0

200

Kilometers from River Mouth10 20 30 40 50 60 70

15

10

5

May 17,1999 0

50

May 1998 (above average freshwater flow)

Sanford et al. 2001, North and Houde 2001

May 1999 (below average freshwater flow)

Stratification, turbidity, salt front locationinfluenced by freshwater flow

NTU

Page 4: ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

Observations about particle trapping in ETMs

• Particle trapping in ETMs occurs by asymmetrical tidal transport of a pool of resuspendible particles with a limited range of settling velocities

• Fine sediments in estuarine environments almost always exist in aggregated (flocculated) form. Aggregation and disaggregation can be active processes, depending on concentration, stickiness, and small scale shear.

• Settling velocities of fine sediments trapped in ETMs are determined by the aggregate properties (size and specific density), not the individual particle properties

Page 5: ETM: The Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

ETM particles are packed with organics> 63 um> 63 um 20 to 63 um20 to 63 um 10 to 20 um10 to 20 um

< 10 um< 10 um Close-upClose-up DAPI stainedDAPI stained

Columbia RiverCrump & Baross, 2000