ETHNIC DIVERSITY AND THE WELFARE STATE A North American Perspective Keith G. Banting Social Mobility...
-
Upload
charles-parrish -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of ETHNIC DIVERSITY AND THE WELFARE STATE A North American Perspective Keith G. Banting Social Mobility...
ETHNIC DIVERSITY AND THE WELFARE STATE
A North American Perspective
Keith G. Banting
Social Mobility and Life Chances Forum
14 November 2005
A Progressive’s Dilemma?
• Are immigration and multiculturalism policies eroding the welfare state?
• Diversity versus Redistribution? • Crowding out/Corroding/Collateral damage/Misdiagnosis
• Recognition versus Redistribution?• Multiculturalism polices exacerbate tensions
The U.S. ExperienceAn Emerging Master Narrative
• Race and the U.S. welfare state
• The politics of social programs
• Backlash against multiculturalism policies
• Public attitudes to race and social redistribution
Politics of Social Policy in the U.S.
• Race, Recognition and Redistribution
• The Politics of Social Security in the 1930s• The War on Poverty in the 1960s• Ending Welfare as We Knew it in the 1990s• Backlash against multiculturalism policies
Public Attitudes and Social Capital
• Gilens: • Why Americans hate welfare
• Alberto Alesina et al• race and trust
• Robert Putnam and Social Capital• bridging and bonding• hunkering down
From Exceptionalism to Master Narrative
• Race and U.S. exceptionalism– A distinctive American pattern?– Myrdal, “An American Dilemma” (1944)
• The U.S. as the quintessential case– U.S. experience as evidence of a universal pattern?– Glazer, “Exceptional No Longer” (1998)
Counter Narratives ICanada
Ethnicity and Trust in Canada
Ethnicity and Support for Redistribution in Canada
• Virtually no relationship
• Sensitivity of minorities, not majorities
• No evidence of majority turning away
Explaining Canadian Experience
• Canadian multicultural identity• Legitimation of difference
• Immigrant economic integration• Traditional pattern of economic integration• Emerging problems in the 1980s and 1990s
• Immigrant political integration• High levels of naturalization• Identity convergence over time
Low-income among Immigrants1980-2000
Political IntegrationSense of pride in Canada
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Aboriginal
French
Southern European
Eastern European
S. Asian/ Middle East
East Asian
Caribbean/African
Marginal effect of ethnicity on probability of x=1, for Pride in Canada
No Controls+ Immigrant Status...+ Age...+ Religion...+ Neighborhood
significantsignificant significantsignificant
Citizenship Ceremonies in Toronto
In Vancouver and Halifax
Counter Narratives IIImmigration and Social Spending
• Immigration and social spending across OECD
• Social spending as % of GDP• Size of foreign-born population • Levels versus change over time
Foreign-Born Population and Social Spending, 2000
AUL
AUTBEL
CAN
DEN
FIN
FRA
FRG
GRE
ICE
IRE
ITA
JPN
NET
NOR
NZL
PORSPN
SWE
UKM
USA
10
15
20
25
30
2000 S
ocia
l W
elfare
Spendin
g, %
GD
P
0 5 10 15 20 252000 Migrant Stock, % Population
Change in Foreign-Born Population and Change in Social Spending
OECD Countries, 1970-1998
Diversity versus Redistribution?
• Race and redistribution: – tension in some societies (US)
• Immigration:– Level of foreign born population not an issue– Pace of change does seem to mater
Counter Narratives IIIRecognition and Redistribution
• A trade-off between recognition and redistribution?
• Historical pattern: attempts to assimilate immigrants
• Multicultural policies of last decades of 2oth century
• Controversy over multiculturalism policies
Multiculturalism Policies
(1) formal affirmation of multiculturalism(2) multiculturalism in school curriculum(3) ethnic representation in the media(4) exemptions from dress-codes, etc.(5) allowing dual citizenship(6) funding of ethnic groups(7) funding of bilingual education(8) affirmative action
Multiculturalism Policies and Change in Social Spending, 1980-2000
AUS
AUT
BEL
CAN
DEN
FIN
FRA
GER
IRL ITA
NET
NOR
SPN
SWE
UK
US
02
46
8
MC
P S
core
-20 0 20 40 60Change in Social Spending as a % of GDP (linear)
Rsq = 0.04
MCP Score and Change in Social Spending as a % of GDP (linear)
Multiculturalism Policies and Change in Redistribution, 1980-2000
AUS
AUT
BEL
CAN
DEN
FIN
FRA
GER
IRLITA
NET
NOR
SPN
SWE
UK
US
02
46
8
MC
P S
core
-20 -10 0 10 20Change in Redistribution (linear)
Rsq = 0.02
MCP Score and Change in Redistribution (linear)
BETWEEN IMMIGRATION AND REDISTRIBUTION
• We need to understand the role of:
• The nature of the immigration flow• Economic integration of immigrants• Political integration of immigrants• Structure of the welfare state
CONCLUDING REFLECTIONS
• Challenging ideas of universal tradeoffs
• The danger of master narratives
• The importance of counter narrative
Thank You