Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation...
-
Upload
adil-javed-chaudhary -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation...
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
1/22
Saqib Ehsan, M. Sc.
Universitt StuttgartInstitut fr Wasserbau
Lehrstuhl fr Wasserbau undWassermengenwirtschaft
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Silke Wieprecht
Risk and Planet Earth Conference 2009, Leipzig
Estimation of possible damagesdue to catastrophic flooding
for long-term
disaster mitigation planning
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
2/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Contents
- Introduction
- 1D-Hydrodynamic modeling with MIKE 11
- Development of an improved method for loss of
life (LOL) estimation
- Loss of life (LOL) estimation for different scenarios
- Conclusions and Suggestions
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
3/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Introduction
- Role of climate change in disaster management
- Possible extreme changes in climate as guidelinesfor the development of new concepts for disaster
mitigation
- Drastic weather change
- Heavy rainfall- Catastrophic flooding downstream of the dam
- Risk to people and property
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
4/22
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
5/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Introduction contd
- Jhelum river valley downstream of Mangla dam in Pakistan
- One of largest earth and rock-fill dams in world
- Main dam height ~125 m high above riverbed
(by Google earth)
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
6/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Introduction contd
Gross storage (original) 7.25 E+9 m3
Net storage (original) 6.59 E+9 m3
Catchment area of reservoir (original) 33,360 km2
Water surface area of reservoir (original)
(at maximum conservation level)
253 km2
Power generation 1,000 MW
Crest length of main dam 2,561 m
Design capacity of main spillway 28,583 m3/s
Design capacity of emergency spillway 6,452 m3/s
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
7/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
1D-Hydrodynamic modeling with MIKE11
Chenab River
Upstream Trimmu Barrrage
Jhelum Bridges
Rasul BarrageMalikwal Bridge
Khushab Bridge
Confluence Point
SuketarNallahBandar Kas
Jabba Kas
Kahan River
Mangla dam
Bunha River
-Project Reach: about 329km
-Different Hydraulic
structures
-Five tributaries between
Mangla and Rasul Barrage;
No gauges are existing there
-1D-modeling for unsteady
flow conditions
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
8/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
1D-Hydrodynamic modeling with MIKE11contd
Maximum Discharges
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
55000
60000
65000
70000
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000
Downstream chainage (m)
Max.Q
(m3/s)
40000 m3/s (withbridges)
40000 m3/s (withoutbridges)
50000 m3/s (withbridges)
50000 m3/s (withoutbridges)
MDF (61977 m3/s: with
bridges)
MDF (61977 m3/s:without bridges)
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
9/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
1D-Hydrodynamic modeling with MIKE11contd
Rasul Barrage
High Flooding Scenarios (maximum water level)
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
0 30000 60000 90000 120000 150000 180000 210000 240000 270000 300000
Downstream chainage (m)
Max.waterlevel(m) 40000 m3/s (with bridges)
50000 m3/s (with bridges)
MDF (61977 m3/s: with bridges)
40000 m3/s (without bridges)
50000 m3/s (without bridges)
MDF (61977 m3/s: without bridges)
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
10/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
1D-Hydrodynamic Modeling with MIKE11contd
Dam break Flood Routing (maximum discharges)
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
220000
240000
260000
280000
300000
320000
0 30000 60000 90000 120000 150000 180000 210000 240000 270000 300000
Downstream chainage (m)
Max.
Q(m3/s)
Case1 (with bridges)
Case2 (with bridges)
Case3 (with bridges)
Case1 (without bridges)
Case2 (without bridges)
Case3 (without bridges)
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
11/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Rasul Barrage
1D-Hydrodynamic Modeling with MIKE11contd
Dam break FloodR
outing (maximum water level)
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
0 30000 60000 90000 120000 150000 180000 210000 240000 270000 300000
Downstream chainage (m)
Max.waterlevel(m)
Case1 (with bridges)
Case2 (with bridges)
Case3 (with bridges)
Case1 (without bridges)
Case2 (without bridges)
Case3 (without bridges)
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
12/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Development an improved LOL estimation method
LOLi= PARi x FATBASE x Fsv x Fage x Fmtx Fstx Fh x Fwar x Fev
LOLi=loss of life at a particular location i`` downstreamof the dam
PARi = Population at risk at a particular location i``downstream of the dam
FATBASE = Base Fatality rate of0.15 (worst case of medium
severity) (Graham, 1999), assuming an average value of1.0 forall other factors with average conditions.
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
13/22
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
14/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Fst= Storey risk factor
Fst= 1 (for high severity and all house types)
Fst= 1- S % (for medium and low severity)
Where, S= % of more storey houses
Fh = Health risk factor; 3% disabled people
Fh = 1 *H % + 1.25*D % (general form)
Where, H= % of PAR with avg. health, D= % of disabled PAR
Development an improved LOL estimation method
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
15/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Fwar = Warning factor (Graham,1999)
Warning Flood Severity understanding FwarNo No 1Some (15-60min) Vague/unclear 0.7 Adequate (>60min) Precise/clear 0.3
Fev = Ease of evacuation factor
Warning Ease of evacuation Fev
No No 1Some (15-60min) Some 0.7 Adequate(>60min) Good
Development an improved LOL estimation method
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
16/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Loss of Life estimation
PAR downstream of Mangla dam (98-Census data)
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
06754
1818
9
26479
3190
4
4613
0
5038
2
5594
7
6365
4
6830
4
7370
3
7837
5
8345
4
9020
5
1027
11
1101
38
1158
56
1221
84
1352
57
1424
42
1525
75
164039
1786
97
1891
27
196388
206975
2169
66
2281
96
2379
66
246780
2565
48
266370
2809
16
Downstream chainage (m)
PAR(No.ofPeopleatrisk)
PAR
Total PAR : 1178038
UrbanPAR : 37%
Rural PAR : 63%
Estimated PAR is related to the highest flood event in the past
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
17/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Loss of Life estimation
Estimated Total Loss of Life downstream of Mangla dam (98-Census data)
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
1
2
3
4
5
S
electedScenarios
Total Loss of Life
LOL (MDF 61977 m3/s:without bridges)
LOL (MDF 61977 m3/s:
with bridges)
LOL (50000 m3/s:
without bridges)
LOL (50000 m3/s: with
bridges)
1- Warning Initiation
30min after Failure
2- Warning Initiation
15min after Failure
3- Warning Initiationat Failure
4- Warning Initiation
1hr before Failure
5- Warning Initiation
2hrs before Failure
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
18/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
%Total Loss of Life for Different Failure Cases
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000
Max. Discharge (m3/s)
%
TotalLOL(
%deadpeople)
%LOL (with bridges)
%LOL (without bridges)
Worst Case for Warning
Initiation:
30 minutes after Failure
Loss of Life estimation
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
19/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Cumulative Loss of Life due to Dam Failure
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
0 25000 50000 75000 100000 125000 150000 175000 200000 225000 250000 275000 300000
Downstream chainage (m)
CumulativeLOL
Failure Case1
Failure Case2
Failure Case3
% Cum. LOL up to 50Km:
about 80% ofTotal LOL
% Cum. LOL up to 100Km:
about 90% ofTotal LOL
Total LOLWorst Case for Warning
Initiation: 30 minutes
after Failure
% Cum. LOL up to 25Km:
about 68% ofTotal LOL
Loss of Life estimation
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
20/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Conclusions and Suggestions
- Severe climate change can cause extreme flooding downstream of adam
- Estimation of possible damages is an important part of any dam
safety study
- Loss of life increases with the delay in warning initiation with respect
to dam failure
- For all dam failure cases, maximum LOL (~80%) occurs in first
50 km downstream of Mangla dam
- % total LOL for the worst case of Mangla dam failure is close to 4%
which seems to be very high
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
21/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
Conclusions and Suggestions
- LOL results clearly show the need of improvement in existing riskReduction measures in order to reduce possible LOL due to Mangla
dam failure
- More research is required to estimate
- ease of evacuation- risks posed by age groups- very low strength houses and more storey houses
- Realistic estimation of possible LOL due to natural hazards likefloods helps in long-term disaster mitigation planning
-
8/3/2019 Estimation of Possible Damages Due to Catastrophic Flooding for Long-term Disaster Mitigation Planning
22/22
Risk and Planet Earth Conference, Panel 2 for Junior Scientists, 4 th March 2009, Leipzig
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
QU
ESTIO
NS??
www.iws.uni-stuttgart.de
Lehrstuhl fr Wasserbau und Wassermengenwirtschaft
Institut fr Wasserbau, Universitt Stuttgart