Estimating the costs of child poverty...childhood obesity, with low-income children more at risk,...
Transcript of Estimating the costs of child poverty...childhood obesity, with low-income children more at risk,...
Estimating the costs of child poverty
Round-upReviewing the evidence
The moral case for eradicating child poverty rests on the immense human cost of allowing children to grow up suffering physical and psychological deprivations and unable to participate fully in society. But child poverty is also costly to everyone in Britain, not just those who experience it directly. What are the costs to the whole of society of allowing child poverty to continue?
This paper:
• includes the findings from three specially-commissioned reports and estimates some of the tangible costs resulting from child poverty.
Key points
• Childpoverty’sconsequencesarewide-rangingandlong-lasting.Childrenfromlow-incomefamiliesarelesslikelytodowellinschool,andmorelikelytosufferill-healthandtofacepressuresintheirlivesthathelptoexplainanassociationwithanti-socialbehavioursandcriminality.
• Theseconsequencescostsociety:inthemoneythatgovernmentspendsintryingtocountertheeffectsofchildpoverty,andintheeconomiccostsofchildrenfailingtoreachtheirpotential.
• Thesecostscannotbecalculatedprecisely,butthefollowingarecautiousestimates:
- Publicspendingtodealwiththefalloutofchildpovertyisabout£12billionayear,about60percentofwhichgoesonpersonalsocialservices,schooleducationandpoliceandcriminaljustice.
- Theannualcostofbelow-averageemploymentratesandearningslevelsamongadultswhogrewupinpovertyisabout£13billion,ofwhich£5billionrepresentsextrabenefitpaymentsandlowertaxrevenues;theremaining£8billionislostearningstoindividuals,affectinggrossdomesticproduct(GDP).
• Theconclusionisthatchildpovertycoststhecountryatleast£25billionayear,including£17billionthatcouldaccruetotheExchequerifchildpovertywereeradicated.Movingallfamiliesabovethepovertylinewouldnotinstantlyproducethissum.Butinthelongterm,hugeamountswouldbesavedfromnothavingtopickupthepiecesofchildpovertyandassociatedsocialills.
AuthorDonaldHirsch,JRFadviser
www.jrf.org.uk
October 2008
2
Introduction
Thefullhumancostofchildpovertyisinestimable.Nobodycanmeasureadequatelythecostinphysicaloremotionalsufferingofatoddlerlivinginadamporovercrowdedhome,orofachildgrowingupinadeprivedcommunitywherehopeofabetterlifeisconstantlycrushed.Politicalcommitmentstoendingchildpovertyarebasedontheideathataricheconomyinthetwenty-firstcenturyshouldbeabletoensurethateverychildgrowsupwithopportunitiesandisabletoparticipateinsociety.
Followingupsuchpoliticalcommitmentsrequiresabigeffortbyawiderangeofpeopleandorganisationsinproducingtheresources,opportunitiesandsocialattitudesneededtomakechildpovertyathingofthepast.Soitisworthhighlightingthecoststhatchildpovertybrings,notjusttothosedirectlyaffected,buttoeveryone.Thesecostsarenotalwayseasilymeasurable,andincludedamagetohowsocietyfunctions,infar-reachingandcomplexways.Butsomeverytangiblepenaltiesarepaidforallowingchildpovertytopersist.Theyincludethecreationofsocialproblemsthatnecessitateextrasocialspending,andthefalloutfromadultsbeingunabletomeettheirfullpotentialasaresultofhavinggrownupinpoverty–includingreducedproductivecapacityintheeconomy,extrabenefitpaymentsandreducedtaxrevenues.
3
ThisRound-upbringstogetherthreestrandsofevidenceontheimpactandcostsofchildpoverty.First,itdrawsonareviewofresearchevidencetodescribesomeoftheconsequencesofchildpovertythatarelikelytohaverepercussionsforsociety.Itassessestheextenttowhichsocialcostscanbeattributedtopovertyitself,andthedegreetowhichthesecostsmightbeexpectedtodiminishasaresultofreductionsinpoverty,alongsideothersocialimprovements.
Secondly,itestimatestheeffectsoftheconsequencesofchildpovertyonsocialspending–acosttotaxpayers.Thisestimateisbasedontheobservationofdifferentlevelsofsocialspendinginsmallareaswithdifferentlevelsofchildpoverty.
Thirdly,itpresentsanestimateoftheknock-oncoststotheeconomyofthelowerproductivecapacityandearningsofadultswhofacedpovertyaschildren.ThiscreatesbothacosttotheExchequerthroughforegonetaxrevenuesandextraspendingonbenefitsandtaxcredits,andalsoawidereconomiccostintermsofreducedeconomicactivityassociatedwithreducedproductionandprivateearnings.
Thepaperassemblestheseestimatestosuggestatotalknowncostofcontinuedchildpovertytotaxpayersandtheeconomy.Thisisnotacomprehensiveestimateofthecostofchildpoverty,butabestestimationofsomeofthetangiblefalloutfromthisphenomenon.
The consequences of child poverty
AliteraturereviewfortheJosephRowntreeFoundation(GriggsandWalker,2008)concludesthat‘theconsequencesofchildpovertyareserious,far-reachingandmulti-faceted’.Itpointstoawiderangeofevidencedemonstratingtheinteractionoflowincome,poorhousing,disadvantagedneighbourhoodsandparentalstressindisadvantagingchildrenintheirimmediateexperiencesandfuturelives.
Animportantfindingofthisreviewisthattheimpactoflowincomeissignificantinitself,aswellasinteractingwithotheraspectsofchildhooddisadvantage.Thisshouldbeborneinmindwhenconsideringthepotentialimpactofraisingfamilyincomesabovethepovertyline.Althoughthiswouldcontributetoreducingthecostsassociatedwithchildpoverty,themosteffectivestrategieswouldneedtocombineactiononincomewithotherpoliciestoreducethedisadvantagesofgrowingupindeprivedneighbourhoodsandinfamiliesfacingarangeofdifficulties.
Definitions
• ThecentraldefinitionofchildpovertyinthisRound-upisthatoflivinginafamilyonarelativelylowincome.Researchersusedifferentdefinitions,butasfaraspossibletheevidencecitedhererelatesto:(a)anincome-basedmeasureand(b)povertydefinitionsthatclassifyacomparableproportionofchildreninpoverty–aboutoneinfour–asthemainchildpovertymeasureusedbytheGovernmentinmeasuringprogresstowardsitstargets.Whileitisnotpossibletouseaprecisecommonthreshold,thebroadobjectiveistolookatcostsresultingfromthelowincomeofarelativelybroadsectionofthepopulation,ratherthanjustextremepovertyaffectingthebottom5or10percent.
• The‘costofpoverty’isnottakentoincludethebenefitsandtaxcreditspaidtofamiliesonlowincomesatthetimewhenchildpovertyoccurs.Theseincometransfersaretreatedaspartofthecostofreducingchildpoverty;theycanbeoffsetagainstthecostsofallowingittocontinue,whicharethesubjectofthispaper.Thisisasimplificationofreality:itisalsopossibletoenvisageinvestmentsinitemsotherthanincometransfers(e.g.spendingoneducation)thatcontributetoreducingchildpovertyinthelongterm.However,sinceincometransfersaresodirectlytiedupwiththesolution,theyarenotseenhereaspartofthecost,exceptinthecaseofbenefitspaidtoadultsdisadvantagedbyhavinglivedinpovertyaschildren.Theserepresentpartoftheconsequenceofallowingchildpovertytocontinue,ratherthanhelpingtopreventitfromoccurringinthefirstplace.
4
Thefollowingmorespecificobservationsontheimpactofpovertyaredrawnfromresearchevidence(seereferencesinGriggsandWalker,2008).Theyfocusonoutcomeslikelytoimpactonsocietyandtaxpayers,notjustindividualsinpoverty.Forthisreasontheyemphasiselong-termdamagewhichislikelytoinfluencehowindividualsfunctioninsociety,ratherthanmeasuringdirecteffectsonchildwell-being.
Damage to children’s physical health Researchcomparingoutcomesofchildrenfromfamiliesinpovertywiththosenotinpovertyshowsclear-cuthealthdifferencesateachstageofthelifecycle(HirschandSpencer,2008).Thehealthpenaltiesofpovertystartbeforebirth.Maternalcharacteristicssuchasdietandstresslevelsduringpregnancyhelptoexplainwhychildrenbornintopovertyhaveamuchhigherchanceofalowbirthweight,whichisassociatedwithextrahealthrisksthroughoutlife.Childreninlow-incomefamiliesarealsolesslikelytobebreastfed,andmorelikelytocontractvariousdiseasessuchasasthma,reportlongstandingillness,beobeseandhavecertaindisabilitiessuchascerebralpalsy.Povertycancontributeinvariouswaystodifferenthealthconditions,includingtheknock-oneffectsofpoormaternalhealthanddiet,thedietofchildrenlivinginpoverty,andpoorhousing,whichcaninfluencethecontractionofrespiratorydiseases,forexample.
Inconsideringthecosttosocietyofthesehigherhealthrisks,onequestionishowmuchimpactthishasonhealthexpenditure.Tosomeextent,thepoorerhealthofchildreninpovertyisoffsetbylow-incomefamilies’lowerusageofhealthservices,relativetotheirhealthstatus.Butsomephenomenawithamuchhigherincidenceinlow-incomefamilies,suchasaccident-relatedhospitaladmissions,incurimmediateextracosts.Moreover,conditionsthatdonotcreatelargeimmediatecostscanbecostlyinthelongerterm.Forexample,whilechildrenagedfiveindeprivedareashavesignificantlymoretoothdecaybutnotmorefillingsthanaverage(implyingunder-useofdentalservices),byage15theyhave50percentmorefillingsthanthoseinnon-deprivedareas,suggestingthattheneedfortreatmenthascaughtupwiththem.
Theassociationbetweenfactorssuchaslowbirthweightandexpensive-to-treatconditionsinadulthood(suchasdiabetesandheartdisease)illustratesthelongperiodoverwhichtheNHSneedstomeetextracostsresultingfrompovertyandsocialdeprivation.Aparticularcurrentconcernistheriseinchildhoodobesity,withlow-incomechildrenmoreatrisk,whichcreateslargelong-termcostsbecauseofassociatedillnessesinadulthood.
Interpreting evidence on the effects of child poverty
Manyharmfulphenomenaareassociatedwithchildpoverty.Thisassociation,atitssimplest,meansthatchildreninfamilieswithlowincomesarestatisticallymorelikelytodoworseatschool,havepoorhealth,andsoon.Inthemselves,suchassociationsshowneitherthatpovertycausestheseilleffects,northatifchildrenwereliftedoutofpovertythedamagewoulddisappear.However,someoftheevidencesuggeststhatasignificantpartoftheeffectisattributabletoincomepoverty,andthatraisingincomeswouldreducethedamage.Inparticular:
• Evidencetrackingchildrenwhohavegrownupinpovertyshowsthattheyfacelaterdisadvantages,evenaftercontrollingforothercharacteristics.Thisisespeciallythecaseforlong-termhealthandeducationaloutcomes;forexample,someofthelowereducationaloutcomesexperiencedbychildreninpovertycanbeattributedtothelowaverageeducationallevelsoftheirparents.However,abouttwo-thirdsoftheobservedrelationshipbetweenpovertyandpooreducationaloutcomesremains,evenaftertakingaccountofdifferencesinparents’backgrounds,
includingeducationallevel(seeBlandenet al.,2008,forsuchcalculations).
• Stringsofevidencepointtothestronglikelihoodofcausallinks.Forexample,pregnantwomenlivinginpovertyaremorelikelytosufferfrompoordietandstress,andmedicalresearchshowsthatsuchconditionsinpregnancycandamagetheirbaby’sfuturehealthduringchildhoodandthroughoutlife.Suchexplanationsoflinksbetweenchildpovertyandpoorhealthoutcomes,combinedwiththeobservationofstronglinksinpractice,powerfullysuggestcausallinkswithoutdirectlyprovingthem.
• Evenwhereitisimpossibletodisentangletheeffectsofincomepovertyfromotherinfluencesinachild’slife,theevidencesuggeststhatraisingincomeisanecessarypartofapackagetoimproveoutcomes.Forexample,better-offchildrenareconsiderablyadvantagededucationallybytakingpartinout-of-schoolactivities.Theevidencesuggeststhatnotjustincomeconstraints,butalsoattitudesandculturalnormspreventworse-offchildrenfromparticipating(Wikeleyet al.,2007).However,addressingthesenormswithoutalsoaddressingthefinancialconstraintsislikelytoproveineffective.
5
Suchlong-termdamagetohealthresultingfromchildpovertycreatesnotjusttreatmentcosts,butalsoeconomiccostsassociatedwithlowercapacitytowork–whethercausedbytimeoffthroughsicknessorlonger-termincapacityamongworking-ageadults.Caringcostsarealsoassociatedwithlong-termhealthdamage.Giventhatsomeestimatesputthetruecostofcaringattensofbillionsofpounds(see,forexample,CarersUK,2007),thepaybackfromthissourceofreducinglong-termill-healthcouldbehuge.
Psychological and emotional impact Atleastasimportantastheimpactonphysicalhealthisthedamagethatpovertydoestopsychologicalandemotionalwell-being.Childreninpovertyaresubstantiallymorelikelytohavementalillnesses,withfamilystressandadverselivingconditionsplayingcontributingroles.Thesedifficultiesappeartobeheightenedbylengthyperiodslivinginpoverty,andinsomecasesbystressesassociatedwithneighbourhood.TherearealsoassociationsbetweenpovertyandlowIQ,althoughevidenceonthegeneticcomponentinthisismixed.
Thecoststosocietyofmentalillness,emotionaldifficultiesandslowercognitivedevelopmentarewide-ranging(see,forexample,Meltzeret al.,2000).Socio-emotionalproblemscancontributetoanti-socialbehaviourorself-destructiveaddictions,withlargeimplicationsforsociety.Slowlearningdevelopmentcancontributetoworselabour-marketoutcomes.Thisaspectofchildhoodhealththereforehasstronglinkswiththeeducationalandbehaviouralthemesdiscussedbelow.
Educational outcomes Awiderangeofevidenceshowsthatchildreninpovertydoworseatschool,andthatthisdamagestheirfutureopportunities.Keyfeaturesofresearchfindingsinthisareaarethat:
• childhoodeducationaldisadvantagestartsearly,withmeasuredcognitiveabilityalreadyaffectedbytheageofthree,whenchildreninpovertyareestimatedtobesixmonthsbehindthenorminschoolreadiness;
• thecumulativeeffectofpovertygrowsthroughoutschooling,withthegapcontinuingtowiden–evenchildrenfromlow-incomefamilieswhostartoutwellhavereducedchancesofprogressing(Hirsch,2007);
• thereisacontinuousgradientofaverageachievement,sotherearenotjustdifferencesbetweenpeoplefromhigherandlowersocialclasses,butfurtherpenaltiesfrombeingonaverylowincome;
• anumberoffactorscombinetocontributetolowerachievement,includingfamilystress,thelevelofeducationalsupportofferedinthehomeandthelevelofparticipationinout-of-schoolactivities(whichcanhelptobuildchildren’sconfidenceaslearners);lowincomecontributestothesefactors,aswellasinteractingwithotherdisadvantages.
Achildwhogoestoschoolwithmanyhomedisadvantagesneedsextrasupportinordertobegiventhesameopportunitiesasanaveragechild;suchsupportgenerallyrequiresextraresources.Inprinciple,thiscreatesacosttotaxpayers.Thiscostarisesinreality,giventhatschoolsinmoredeprivedareashaveonaveragemorespentperpupil.However,asthisisnotenoughtoequaliselifechances,itshowsthatonlypartofthecostpaidbysocietyforchildpovertywithrespecttoeducationcomesfromspendingatthisstage.
Perhapsabiggercostarisesfromthefalloutfromallowingsomanyyoungpeoplegrowingupinpovertytofailtorealisetheirpotential.Thisleadstomuchlowerearningsprospects,withimplicationsforthenation’soveralleconomicoutput(seebelow),andinsomecasestothefalloutfromdisaffectionamongyoungpeoplewhohave‘failed’.Inparticular,thephenomenonof‘NEETs’(youngpeoplenotineducation,employmentortraining)createscostsintermsofsupportindealingwithissuessuchashomelessness,addictionsandpotentiallythecostsofanti-socialbehaviourandcrime.
Lower future employment prospects Thosewhogrowupinlow-incomehouseholdsaremorelikelytobeunemployed,toworkinloworunskilledjobs,andtobepoorlypaidinadultlife.Thiseffectpersistsaftercontrollingforeducationalachievement,andhasgrownovertime.Theresearchsuggeststhatacriticalfactoristhedifficultyinmakingthetransitionintostablework.Pastgenerationswereabletopursueclearer,morewell-troddenroutesintolow-skilledandskilled-manualemployment,eveniftheyheldlimitededucationalqualifications.Butmanyofthejobstheywentintonolongerexist,andmanyoftoday’sjobsrequirearangeof‘softskills’thatchildrenfromdeprivedfamiliesoftenlack(see,forexample,MargoandDixon,2006).
6
Crime and negative behaviours Povertyitselfdoesnotcausechildrenandyoungpeopletocommitcrimes.Yettherearestrongassociationsbetweensocialandeconomicdisadvantageandratesofoffendingandanti-socialbehaviours.Anothertellingassociationisthestronglinkbetweenpovertyandsuiciderisk.Thissuggeststhatnegativebehavioursshownbysomechildreninpovertyarelinkedtodeep-seateddamagetotheirlives.Thosegrowingupindeprivedareasalsohaveamuchgreaterchanceofbeingavictimofcrime,combinedwithastrongassociationbetweenhavingexperiencedcrimeasavictimandbecominganoffender(see,forexample,Aberet al.,1997).
Theevidencesuggeststhatdifficultiessuchaspoorfamilyfunctioningandlowself-esteem,whichcanbecontributingfactorstoanti-socialactivities,areinturnfedbychildhoodpoverty.Thesemediatingfactorshelptoexplainwhyyoungpeoplewhogrowupinpovertyaremorelikelythanaveragetobecomeinvolvedinanti-socialbehaviourandcrime.However,thisconclusionneedstobeusedwithcare,sinceitdoesnotpointtoaclear,directcausallink:itcannotbesaidthatchildrencommitcrimessimplybecausetheyarelivinginpoverty.
Thelargecoststosocietyofincreasedanti-socialbehaviourandcriminalityareself-evident.Whenpeoplegetinvolvedinsuchactivityatayoungage,thereareimmediatecoststhroughtheyouthjusticesystemandalsolonger-termcoststhroughpatternsofrepeatedoffendingandfailuretobecomeproductiveearnersandtaxpayers.
Family relationships Theresearchsuggeststhatmanagingonalowincomemakesgoodfamilyfunctioningmoredifficultandcanaffectthequalityofparent–childrelationships.Whetherornotpovertyitselfcausesstress,itcanaffectparents’abilitytomanageotherstressfuleventsanddifficulties.Whilethereisnoclear-cutevidencetoshowthatparentsinpovertyaremorelikelytoengageinpracticessuchasphysicalviolenceagainsttheirchildren,acorrelationhasbeenidentifiedbetweenfamilyincomeandchildrenbeingremovedfromtheirparents’care(Barthet al.,2006).
Aconcentrationofchildren’ssocialservicesresourcesonfamiliesonlowerincomesrepresentsanimmediatecosttotaxpayers.Inthelongerterm,childrenfaceextensivepenaltiesfromgrowingupinfamilieswithnegativerelationships.Theyfindithardertoformrelationshipsthemselves,andtobuildupnetworksand‘socialcapital’.Researchhashighlightedtheimportanceofastablehomeenvironmentforchildren’sdevelopmentandmentalwell-being,withknock-oneffectsonmentalhealth,learning,behaviouralandultimatelyemploymentoutcomes.Anotherimportantoutcomeisthechanceofbecomingaloneparent,whichishigherforthosewhohavegrownupinpoverty.
Strength and well-being of communitiesChildpovertycanalsohavenegativeimpactsontheresourcerepresentedbyacommunity.Forexample,povertycanlimitafamily’sabilitytobecomeintegratedintothelocalcommunityandformsocialnetworks.Inaddition,stigmaassociatedwithpovertycanbedetrimentaltocommunityrelationshipsandcanreinforceinequalities.Thisstigmacanbeexacerbatedforthoselivingincommunitieswhereoutsidersassociatehighratesofdeprivationwithhighratesofanti-socialbehaviourandcrime.
Interpreting consequences and costsMuchoftheaboveevidencesuggeststhatchildpovertyinteractswithmanyotherfactorstoproducenegativeconsequencesandcosts.However,thereisconsiderablecomplexityinidentifyinghowconsequencesfeedintocosts.Understandingthisprocessaswellaspossibleisvaluablefordevelopingstrategiestoreducepovertyanditscosts,alongsidestrategiestotacklerelatedsocialills.
Figure1illustratesonewayoflookingattherelationshipsbetweenthecostsandoutcomesofchildpoverty.Thetoppartofthediagram(thestatusquo)suggeststhatthenegativeconsequencesbringbroadlytwokindsofcost.Oneistheresourcesdevotedtotryingtoamelioratetheseconsequences;theotheristhelonger-termcostsoffailuretoamelioratethemfully.Thelattercanberegardedasthecostofhaving‘unmetneed’.
Forexample,ineducationthefirsttypeofcostmightincludeextrahelpforachildwhosefamilypovertyhasmadeithardertolearn,whilethesecondtypemightincludefutureunemploymentbenefitresultingfromthatchildgrowingupwithlowqualificationsandfindingithardertogetwork.
7
Thesecondtypeofcostimpliesadegreeoffailureorlimitationinthefirst,sinceiftheeducationsystemweretosucceedinlevellingtheplayingfield,subsequentdisadvantagewouldnotensue.Butthisdoesnotmeanthatextraspendingoneducationforchildreninpoverty,evencombinedwiththemosteffectiveeducationalstrategies,couldeverfullycompensatefortheirdisadvantageseducationally.
Inreality,theevidencesuggeststhatsomeconsequencesofpovertycannotbefullyreversed,sotheonlywayofavoidinganylong-termcostsisapreventativeapproach.Thebottompartofthediagramindicatesthatupfronteffortstoavoidpovertycanreducecostslateron.Italsoaccepts,however,thatreducingpovertywillnoteliminateallsocialdisadvantage,butitwillmakeothersocialspendingmorecost-effective.Thiscanbeinferredfromevidencethateffortstohelp,say,underachievingstudentsatschool,haveenjoyedverylimitedsuccessinraisingoutcomesforchildrenimpededbyfamilypoverty.Childrenwhostartoutdoingbadlyatschoolhavemuchbetterchanceofbeinghelpedtohigherachievementiftheyarenotinpoverty.Someasurestocutpovertyandtohelpunderachievingstudentscantogetherimproveoutcomesmuchmorethaneitherpolicyinisolation.
Thefollowingtwo-partcalculationofactualcostsassociatedwithchildpovertyisbasedonthesequencesuggestedinFigure1.Itlooksfirstathowservicescostmorewherechildpovertyishigher,andsecondlyatcostsassociatedwithanimportantlong-termconsequenceofchildpoverty–theeffectonthelabourmarket.
Estimating extra public service costs
Basedontheabovereviewofresearchevidence,highersocialspendingwouldbeexpectedtoresultfromhigherchildpoverty,asservicesattempttomitigatethedamagethatpovertydoestothelivesofchildren,familiesandcommunities.Socialspendingisindeedhigherinareaswithgreaterchildpoverty.Butthisdoesnotmeanthatifallchildrenwereliftedoutofpoverty,spendingintheseareaswouldreverttothenorm,sinceotherfeaturesthatcharacterisedeprivedareasmaystillbepresent.However,itispossibletoestimatetheeffectofpovertyonextraservicecostsbyconsideringtheassociationbetweentheproportionofchildreninpovertyinalocalareaandthecostofservicesinthatarea,controllingforotherfactorsthatcausespendingtobehigh.
Figure 1: Illustration of relationship between costs and outcomes
.
8
BramleyandWatkins(2008)haveusedthebestdataavailableonlocalspendingvariationstoconductsuchanexercise.Thiscalculationinvolvedthefollowingstepsforeachofanumberofpubliclyfundedservicesthatchildpovertycouldmakemoreexpensive:
• Considertheaveragespendingperchildineachlocalarea.Theareausedvariedaccordingtodataavailability;mostcommonlyitwaswardorpostcodedistrict.
• Considerthepercentageofchildreninpovertyinthatarea.Thedefinitionofpovertyalsovariedaccordingtodataavailability,butgenerallymeasuredincomedeprivationaffectingroughly20–25percentofchildren,acomparablefiguretothenumberinpovertyontheGovernment’spreferreddefinition(i.e.livinginhouseholdswithbelow60percentmedianincomebeforehousingcosts).
• Calculatetherelationshipbetweenchildpovertyandspending:howmuchextraspendingisassociatedwitheachpercentagepointdifferenceintheproportionofchildreninanareaclassifiedasbeinginpoverty.
• Modifytheabovecalculationbycontrollingforotherfactorssuchasdemographyandsocio-economicstatuswhichcanalsoimpactonspendingandwhichwouldnotchangeifpovertywerereduced.NB:someotherfactorssuchasunemploymentaresocloselyassociatedwithpovertythattheyweretreatedaspartofthesamephenomenon.
• Basedontheassociationbetweentheproportionofchildreninpovertyandthecostoftheservice,estimatewhatpercentageofoverallspendingontheserviceisattributabletopoverty.
• Applythispercentagetoactualspendontheservicetoestimatethenationalcostofchildpovertyfortheservice.
Basedonthesecalculations,BramleyandWatkinshaveestimatedthecostofservicesattributabletochildpoverty,asshowninTable1.
Table 1: Estimates of the cost of child poverty by service, England and UK, 2006/07 (£ million)
Expenditure attributed to child poverty
a) amount b) as percentage of all spending in each service area
Service England £m UK £m
Low High Low High Low High
Personalsocialservices 2,414 2,414 2,849 2,849 71 71
Acutehealthcare 1007 1007 1211 1211 2 2
Primaryhealthcare 730 730 859 859 5 5
Schooleducation 2,300 2,300 2,888 2,888 10 10
Newsocialhousing 527 1,166 748 1,654 37 98
HousingbenefitandCTB* 0 3,757 0 4,420 32
DecentHomesprogramme 0 1,477 0 1,697 31
Policeandcriminaljustice 1,060 2,502 1,240 2,927 5 12
Fireandrescue 724 724 926 926 33 42
Localenvironmental 338 675 395 790 11 22
Area-basedprogramme 405 405 477 478 43 43
Total 9,506 17,159 11,593 20,699
*CouncilTaxBenefit
9
Foreachservice,Table1estimateshowmuchspendingcanbeassociatedwithchildpoverty.Thisisthenshownasapercentageshareofallspendingonthatservice(finaltwocolumns).Insomecases,higherandlowerestimatesaregiven,toreflectparticularuncertaintiesabouttheextenttowhichtheextracostsshouldbeassociatedwithchildpoverty–mostnotablyforhousingandcriminaljusticeservices(seeBramleyandWatkins,2008forfulldetails).
ThetotalsinTable1givealowerestimateof£11.6billionandahigherestimateof£20.7billionforthecostofchildpovertytoUKpublicexpenditure.Adjustingto2008/09values(relativetoGDP,basedona6percentnominalgrowthrateovertwoyearsasshowninbudgetestimatesofGDPbetween2006and2008),thesefiguresriseto£12.3billionand£21.9billionrespectively.Thebiggestitemsincashtermsarepersonalsocialservices,schooleducationandthepolice/criminaljustice,whichaccountforwelloverhalfofthetotalcost(onthelowerestimate).
Spendingonsocialservicesstandsoutascomprisingthegreatestconcentrationofexpenditureindeprivedareas.Mostofthespendingontheserviceisassociatedwithchildpoverty–i.e.theserviceisneededinlargepartbecausechildrengrowingupindeprivedfamiliesfaceparticularproblems.Thisisclearlynotthecaseforservicessuchaseducation,whicheverybodyneeds.Here,expenditureisskewedtodisadvantagedareastoamuchsmallerdegreethanforsocialservices,asshownbythepercentagefiguresinthefinalcolumnofTable1.Butthehightotallevelofspendingoneducationmeansthatthecostassociatedwithchildpovertyisstilllargeinabsoluteterms,asisthecasewiththepoliceandcriminaljustice.
Inthecaseofhealthcare,theveryweakskewingofresourcestowardsareaswheremanychildrenareinpovertytosomeextentconfirmsthehypothesisthatpoorhealthoutcomesforpeopleonlowincomesarenotfullyreflectedinextrauseofhealthcare.However,thereisameasurementprobleminseparatingouthealthspendingonchildrenandattributingittochildpoverty.Shouldthelowerorupperestimatebeused?Intheserviceswheretheseestimatesdiffer,ithasprovenhardtodistinguishfullytheeffectsofchildpovertyfromthoseofotherrelatedphenomena.BramleyandWatkinssuggestcautionregardinghowmuchofthecosttoattributetochildpovertyassuch.Thisconsiderationsuggestthatitwouldbeprudenttotakethelowerfigureof£12billionastheestimateofthecostofchildpovertyforservicespending.Thisfigureshouldbeinterpretedasaminimumitmightbehopedtosaveinthelongtermasaresultofabolishingchildpovertyinconjunctionwithaddressingrelatedsocialproblems.
Knock-on costs of child poverty
Inadditiontothecoststoservicesoutlinedabove,childpovertybringsimportantlong-termeconomiccoststosociety.Inparticular,childrenwhogrowupinpovertyarelesslikelythantheaveragetoworkasadults,andcangenerallyexpectlowerearningsiftheydo.Thecostofthiscanbeillustratedbyestimatinghowmuchlessnationalincomeisgeneratedasaresultofchildpoverty,howmuchthisextraincomewouldhavecontributedtotaxrevenues,andtheextracostofsupportingpeoplewhoarenotworking.Thispartofthecalculationcombinesthefuturepubliccostofchildpovertywiththecosttothefutureincomeoftheindividualsaffected.Thelattercanhaveknock-oneffectsforsocietyintermsofoverallproductivepotentialandthespendingpowerthatthoseindividualswouldhavecontributedtotheeconomy.
Inashortmodellingexercise,Blandenet al.(2008)havemadeaconservativeestimateofthesecosts.Themodellingstartedbyusingcohortstudiestolookattheassociationbetweenbeinginpovertyatage16withearningsandemploymentchancesuptoage34.Inestimatingthe‘povertypenalty’onearningsandemploymentrates,themodellingcontrolledforparentalcharacteristicstogetascloseaspossibletoaneffectcausedbypovertyitselfratherthanotheraspectsofanindividual’sbackground.
Havingestablishedthatrelationship,theanalysisfirstlyconsideredhowmuchwouldbegainedinextraearningsandreducedbenefitpaymentsifalladultswhogrewupinpovertywereinsteadtoavoidpovertyandtherebyimprovetheiremploymentandearningprospects.Inmakingthiscalculation,itwasnotassumedthatallthoseindividualswouldgointojobsonaverageearnings,sinceliftingchildrenabovethepovertylinewouldnotmaketheminto‘average’individuals–theirsocio-economicbackgroundandfamilyincomeswouldstillbebelowaverage.
Rather,theanalysisassumedthatthoseinworkwhonolongerhadgrownupinpovertywouldhavetheirincomesraisedtotheaverageforpeoplewhohadgrownupinfamiliesabovethepovertylinebutstillonmodestincomes.(Specifically,theaverageforpeoplewithbetween60%and120%medianincome.)Further,itassumedthattheprobabilityofemploymentforpeoplewhowouldotherwisehavegrownupinpovertywouldrisetotheaverageemploymentrateforallgroups,andthatthe‘extra’peopleemployedasaresultwouldearnatthe25thpercentileofearnings.Thislastassumptionwasanarbitrarywayofacknowledgingthatsuchindividualswouldbelikelytobeinlower-payingjobs:the25thpercentileputstheminthemiddleofthedistributionofthelower-earninghalfofthepopulation.
10
Theauthorsofthisresearchare,however,cautiousaboutpredictingthatemploymentandearningswouldgrowbyasmuchasthismodelassumesonthisfirstestimate.Theassumptionssuggestthattheconsequenceofadultsnothavingtheexperienceofchildpovertywouldbetomakethemmorelikeotheradultswhodidnotexperiencechildpoverty.However,insofarasthisoccursbecausetheybecomemoreemployable,withhigherskills,itisnotclearthatthedemandforlabourwiththeseimprovedcharacteristicswouldexpandfullytoabsorbthesenewworkers.Lookedatanotherway,theremaybeanextenttowhichthepenaltypaidforgrowingupinpovertyisagreaterchanceofbeingatthe‘bottomoftheheap’inadulthood,buttakingawaythisdisadvantagemaynotnecessarilychangetheshapeoftheheap,andthereforetheoverallearningsandtaxrevenuesgeneratedbytheeconomy.
Blandenet al.dealwiththisissuebymakingcautiousassumptionsabouttheextenttowhichthelabourmarketmightadapttotheinfluxofabetter-qualifiedcohortofworkers,basedonpriorevidencerelatedtotheentryofimmigrants.Theresultofthiscalculationistosuggestthathalvingtheestimatedescribedaboveproducesalowerboundtothetrueestimatedgainsfromendingchildpoverty;experiencesuggeststhatafigureclosetothislowerboundisamoreplausibleestimatethanamidpoint.Onthisbasis,thecalculationsproducethefollowingcautiousfigures:
• Thecombinedcostinhigherbenefitpaymentsandlowergrossearningsresultingfromtheeffectsofpastchildpovertyamountstoatleast1 per cent of GDP,or£13billion(calculationsusingfiguresfromBlandenet al.,adjustedfrom2006to2008GDPlevels–estimatedtobe£1.28trillionratherthan£1.2trillionin2006).
• Thisfigurecomprisesapproximately£2 billioninbenefitcostsand£11 billioninforegoneearnings.
• Oftheearningssacrifice,£3 billionwouldhavebeenpaidtotheExchequerinextraincometaxandNationalInsurance(NI),and£8 billionwouldbekeptbyprivateindividuals.
• Therefore,ofthe£13billionthatmightbegainedfromendingchildpoverty,about£8 billion representsmoremoneyforthoseadultsfromfamiliesliftedoutofpoverty(andextraspendingthatcouldhelptoboosttheeconomy),while£5 billionwouldbeagaintotheExchequer.
Figure 2: Adding up the costs
.
11
Conclusion
Itisclearfromtheevidencepresentedabovethatchildpovertybringslargecosts–notjustintermsofthehardshipexperiencedbythoseaffected,butalsointermsofpublicexpenditureandfutureeconomicpotential.Theexactsizeofthesecostsisimpossibletodetermine,buttheestimatescompiledhereshowthattheyaresubstantial.Figure2summarisesthetangiblecostsestimatedonthebasisofthemodellingcarriedoutfortheJosephRowntreeFoundationbyBramleyandWatkinsandbyBlandenet al.(2008)
Thus,theestimatedtotalidentifiablecostsofchildpovertyare£25billionayear(equivalenttoabout2percentofGDP),ofwhich£17billioncomprisessavingstotheExchequer.Inusingthesefigures,thefollowingpointsneedtobeborneinmind:
• Theestimatestakethelowerendoftherangeofpotentialcosts,andsoshouldbetakenasacautiousestimateinthesenseofidentifyingtheminimumcostineachcase.
• Whiletheestimatesareconservativeaboutthequantityofcostidentified,theyneedtobetreatedwithcautionintermsoftheextenttowhichchildpovertyitselfhasbroughtaboutthesecosts,andabolishingchildpovertywouldbringaboutequivalentsavings.Thetotalfigureencompassesarangeofdifferentlevelsofevidence.Thelabour-marketestimatesarebasedonresearchthatcancompareovertimethetrajectoriesofthosewhodidanddidnotgrowupinpovertyandtakeaccountoftheimpactofotherinfluenceslikeparentaleducation.Thisproducesarelativelyrobustestimateoftheconsequencesofchildpoverty,atleastforindividuals.Theservicescostestimatesdonotpermitsuchcomparisonsovertime.Therefore,thereisgreateruncertaintyregardingtheextenttowhichchildpovertycausesratherthanisjustassociatedwiththehighercosts.
• ThefairestinterpretationofthesecostsistoseethemasthepotentialbenefitstotheExchequerandtheeconomyofabolishingchildpoverty.Anarrowfocusonraisingfamilyincomesaboveanarbitrarythresholdmaynotachievethesebenefits.Butifactiontoaddresschildpovertyispartofastrategytohelpfamiliestoimprovetheirlivesmoregenerally,thesearesomeofthesavingsthatcouldresult.
• Alltheevidenceusedforthispaperemphasisestheextenttowhichsuchbenefitswillaccruenotthroughsingleshort-termpolicies,butthroughaprocessthatbuildsovertime.Improvingfamilyoutcomesfromonegenerationtothenextcancreatevirtuouscircles.Forexample,theeffectsofimprovedlabour-marketoutcomesforagenerationthatgrowsuppoverty-freewouldnotjustreducebenefitsexpenditureandimprovetaxrevenues.Itwouldalsohelptoreducetheneedforfuturesocialspendingbyproducingfewer‘casualties’inthenextgenerationofchildren.
Takeninthiscontext,the£25billionannualcostofchildpovertycanbeseenasaclearjustificationformakingstrenuouseffortstofollowthroughonthepledgeoferadicatingchildpoverty,evenifittakesconsiderableresourcestoachievethisend.TheJosephRowntreeFoundationestimatedin2006thatitwouldtakeintheorderofanextra£30billionayeartoeradicatechildpovertyby2020solelythroughgovernment-orderedredistribution.NeithertheJRFnorothercommentatorssuggest,however,thatthisamountshouldbespent,sincepublicredistributionshouldnotbetheonlytool.Rather,solutionswillrequireacombinationofredistributionwithcost-effectivemeasuresthathelpfamiliestoenhancetheirprivateincomes,makingthetotalcosttotheTreasuryoferadicationlikelytobefarlessthan£30billion.
Theidentificationhereofapotential£17billionayearinpublicsavingsthereforesuggeststhatinthelongtermapolicycombiningredistributionwiththepromotingofopportunitiescouldlargelypayforitself.Putanotherway,thelargeamountspresentlywastedonpayingforthefalloutfromchildpovertycouldbemoreproductivelyemployedinpreventingitfromoccurringinthefirstplace.Thiswouldbringadoublebenefit–forthefamilieswhosequalityoflifewouldbeimprovedandforsociety,whichwouldnolongerhavetopaytopickupthepieces.
www.jrf.org.uk
PublishedbytheJosephRowntreeFoundation,TheHomestead,40WaterEnd,YorkYO306WP.ThisprojectispartoftheJRF’sresearchanddevelopmentprogramme.Thesefindings,however,arethoseoftheauthorsandnotnecessarilythoseoftheFoundation.ISSN0958-3084
Read more Round-ups at www.jrf.org.uk
Other formats available.Tel: 01904 615905 email: info @jrf.org.uk
Ref: 2313
About this paper
ThisRound-up isbasedonthreereportscommissionedbytheJosephRowntreeFoundation,examiningtheconsequencesofchildpovertyandestimatingthecoststhatresult:Blandenet al.,BramleyandWatkins,andGriggsandWalker(seebelow).
ReferencesBlanden,J.,Hansen,K.andMachin,S.(2008)The
GDP costs of the lost earning potential of adults who grew up in poverty.York:JRF
Bramley,G.andWatkins,D.(2008)The public service costs of child poverty.York:JRF
Griggs,J.andWalker,R.(2008)The costs of child poverty for individuals and society: A literature review.York:JRF
Other referencesAber,J.,Bennett,N.,Conley,D.andLi,J.(1997)‘The
effectsofpovertyonchildhealthanddevelopment’,Annual Review of Public Health,18,463–483
Barth,R.,Wildfire,J.andGreen,R.(2006)‘Placementintofostercareandtheinterplayofurbanicity,childbehaviorproblems,andpoverty’,American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,76(3),358–366
CarersUK(2007)Valuing carers – calculating the value of unpaid care.London:CarersUK
Hirsch,D.(2007)Chicken and egg – child poverty and educational inequality.London:ChildPovertyActionGroup
Hirsch,D.andSpencer,N.(2008)Unhealthy lives; intergenerational links between child poverty and poor health in the UK,summarybriefing.London:EndChildPoverty
Margo,J.andDixon,M.(2006)Freedom’s orphans – raising youth in a changing world.London:IPPR
Meltzer,H.,Gatward,R.,Goodman,R.andFord,T.(2000)The mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain.London:TheStationeryOffice
Wikeley,F.etal.(2007)Educational relationships outside school: why access is important.York:JRF