Establishing the A. E. Watkins landrace cultivar ... · Establishing the A. E. Watkins landrace...
12
1 3 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842 DOI 10.1007/s00122-014-2344-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Establishing the A. E. Watkins landrace cultivar collection as a resource for systematic gene discovery in bread wheat Luzie U. Wingen · Simon Orford · Richard Goram · Michelle Leverington‑Waite · Lorelei Bilham · Theofania S. Patsiou · Mike Ambrose · Jo Dicks · Simon Griffiths Received: 10 October 2013 / Accepted: 5 June 2014 / Published online: 2 July 2014 © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com regarding the diversity of the Watkins collection was used to develop resources for wheat research and breed- ing, one of them a core set, which captures the major- ity of the genetic diversity detected. The understanding of genetic diversity and population structure together with the availability of breeding resources should help to accelerate the detection of new alleles in the Watkins collection. Introduction Hexaploid bread or common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important staple crop with over 600 million tonnes being harvested annually. Wheat was originally domesticated about 10,000 years ago in the fertile cres- cent (see Shewry 2009 for a review). The wheat genome has derived from hybridisation of the domesticated tetraploid progenitor emmer (Triticum dicoccoides), the donor of the A and B genome, with the wild diploid species Aegilops tauschii, the donor of the D genome (Salamini et al. 2002). From its origin of domestication, which is located in today’s southeastern part of Turkey, the crop was spread by the human population and culti- vated in many parts of the world. It came to Europe via a route to Anatolia, then to Greece. From there, one way proceeded northward through the Balkans to the Danube. A second route went across to Italy, France and Spain, finally reaching UK and Scandinavia. In a similar way, wheat spread via Iran to central Asia, reaching China, and via Egypt into Africa. It was introduced by Spaniards to Mexico in 1529 and to Australia in 1788 (Feldmann 2001). Domestication has reportedly introduced population bot- tlenecks leading to a lower genetic diversity in crop plants Abstract Key message A high level of genetic diversity was found in the A. E. Watkins bread wheat landrace col‑ lection. Genotypic information was used to determine the population structure and to develop germplasm resources. Abstract In the 1930s A. E. Watkins acquired landrace cultivars of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from official channels of the board of Trade in London, many of which originated from local markets in 32 countries. The geographic distribution of the 826 landrace cultivars of the current collection, here called the Watkins col- lection, covers many Asian and European countries and some from Africa. The cultivars were genotyped with 41 microsatellite markers in order to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of the collection. A high level of genetic diversity was found, higher than in a collection of modern European winter bread wheat varieties from 1945 to 2000. Furthermore, although weak, the population structure of the Watkins collec- tion reveals nine ancestral geographical groupings. An exchange of genetic material between ancestral groups before commercial wheat-breeding started would be a possible explanation for this. The increased knowledge Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2344-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Communicated by Andreas Graner. L. U. Wingen (*) · S. Orford · R. Goram · M. Leverington-Waite · L. Bilham · T. S. Patsiou · M. Ambrose · J. Dicks · S. Griffiths John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Transcript of Establishing the A. E. Watkins landrace cultivar ... · Establishing the A. E. Watkins landrace...
1 3
Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842DOI 10.1007/s00122-014-2344-5
OrIGInAl PAPer
Establishing the A. E. Watkins landrace cultivar collection as a resource for systematic gene discovery in bread wheat
Luzie U. Wingen · Simon Orford · Richard Goram · Michelle Leverington‑Waite · Lorelei Bilham · Theofania S. Patsiou · Mike Ambrose · Jo Dicks · Simon Griffiths
received: 10 October 2013 / Accepted: 5 June 2014 / Published online: 2 July 2014 © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
regarding the diversity of the Watkins collection was used to develop resources for wheat research and breed-ing, one of them a core set, which captures the major-ity of the genetic diversity detected. The understanding of genetic diversity and population structure together with the availability of breeding resources should help to accelerate the detection of new alleles in the Watkins collection.
Introduction
Hexaploid bread or common wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) is an important staple crop with over 600 million tonnes being harvested annually. Wheat was originally domesticated about 10,000 years ago in the fertile cres-cent (see Shewry 2009 for a review). The wheat genome has derived from hybridisation of the domesticated tetraploid progenitor emmer (Triticum dicoccoides), the donor of the A and B genome, with the wild diploid species Aegilops tauschii, the donor of the D genome (Salamini et al. 2002). From its origin of domestication, which is located in today’s southeastern part of Turkey, the crop was spread by the human population and culti-vated in many parts of the world. It came to europe via a route to Anatolia, then to Greece. From there, one way proceeded northward through the Balkans to the Danube. A second route went across to Italy, France and Spain, finally reaching UK and Scandinavia. In a similar way, wheat spread via Iran to central Asia, reaching China, and via egypt into Africa. It was introduced by Spaniards to Mexico in 1529 and to Australia in 1788 (Feldmann 2001).
Domestication has reportedly introduced population bot-tlenecks leading to a lower genetic diversity in crop plants
Abstract Key message A high level of genetic diversity was found in the A. E. Watkins bread wheat landrace col‑lection. Genotypic information was used to determine the population structure and to develop germplasm resources.Abstract In the 1930s A. e. Watkins acquired landrace cultivars of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) from official channels of the board of Trade in london, many of which originated from local markets in 32 countries. The geographic distribution of the 826 landrace cultivars of the current collection, here called the Watkins col-lection, covers many Asian and european countries and some from Africa. The cultivars were genotyped with 41 microsatellite markers in order to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of the collection. A high level of genetic diversity was found, higher than in a collection of modern european winter bread wheat varieties from 1945 to 2000. Furthermore, although weak, the population structure of the Watkins collec-tion reveals nine ancestral geographical groupings. An exchange of genetic material between ancestral groups before commercial wheat-breeding started would be a possible explanation for this. The increased knowledge
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2344-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Communicated by Andreas Graner.
l. U. Wingen (*) · S. Orford · r. Goram · M. leverington-Waite · l. Bilham · T. S. Patsiou · M. Ambrose · J. Dicks · S. Griffiths John Innes Centre, norwich research Park, norwich, UKe-mail: [email protected]
1832 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
in comparison to wild ancestors (Doebley et al. 2006). Following the introduction of domesticated wheat, varie-ties became adapted to local conditions becoming the so-called landrace cultivars (lCs). In this process, the genetic variation was further reduced by genetic drift and selec-tion (reif et al. 2005). However, the process is unlikely to have happened under complete isolation, rather exchange of breeding material between neighbours and by more dis-tant trade will have occurred. Subsequently, genetic diver-sity of modern elite cultivars (MC) may have even become lower, if breeding was based on a narrowing germplasm base (Tanksley 1997). A recurrent theme in this research is the possibility that more diversity may have been left behind in lCs during the ‘green revolution’ when breed-ing strategies hypothetically focused on a few target genes only (Khush 2001). However, this assertion is not generally true. A narrowing or enrichment of the germplasm diver-sity depends on the particular breeding programme applied. Among CIMMYT wheat varieties in the period from 1949 to 1989 a decrease in genetic diversity was found, contrary to an increase in the period from 1990 to 1997 (reif et al. 2005). Different trends for the genetic diversity of modern wheat lines in the USA (increasing), Australia (constant) and the UK (decreasing) between 1940 and 2005 have been reported (White et al. 2008). Similarly, genetic diver-sity trends could be linked to wheat breeding practices in european countries (roussel et al. 2005), where MCs from western countries show a lower number of alleles. Further-more, it has been shown that the narrowing of the germ-plasm base in bread wheat can be averted through the intro-gression of novel materials, e.g. coming from lCs (Smale et al. 2002; reif et al. 2005).
A. e. Watkins, from the School of Agriculture in Cam-bridge, was interested in Vavilov’s work on the origins of crop plants and plant domestication (Watkins 1933; Vavilov 1931). He thus acquired bread wheat and macaroni wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) lCs from markets predominantly in Asia and europe, but also from other parts of the world using connections with the london Board of Trade. In this way, he established a considerable wheat collection of over 7,000 accessions (Miller et al. 2001). Unfortunately many were lost during the Second World War when the material was put into storage. The collection today consists of a cur-rent viable bread wheat lC collection of 826 accessions, here called the Watkins collection. The Watkins collection captures a snap shot of genetic diversity present before the start of modern breeding. This is compared to the diversity present in MCs adapted to northern european climate. The eU Commission Key Action 5 project ‘Genetic Diversity in Agriculture: Temporal Flux, Sustainable Productivity and Food Security’ (Gediflux) was established to investigate the impact of intensive breeding over time on the genetic diver-sity of different european crops, one of them winter bread
wheat (reeves et al. 2004). A panel of over 500 wheat MCs from across europe, here called the Gediflux collection, which had been sown in major acreages in the years 1945–2000, has been used for this study. The panel was geno-typed using 42 microsatellite (single sequence repeat, SSr) markers and the genetic diversity was assessed (reeves et al. 2004). In general, no significant change in genetic diversity was detected over time for any of the crops stud-ied, including the winter bread wheat panel.
The threat of climate change and the growing human population paired with the observed lower rates of genetic gain calls for improved methods to obtain a sustain-able increase of crop yields. Increasing crop diversity by exploiting the diversity of lCs is one strategy to approach this goal. Useful and currently rare alleles, introgressed into elite wheat lines, may help to improve grain yield or to adapt the plants to new climate conditions. Studies on the genetic diversity of bread wheat lC collections (Huang et al. 2002; Balfourier et al. 2007; Horvath et al. 2009) reveal a high level of genetic diversity and suggest a rich source of alleles not used in modern breeding.
The Watkins collection has been successfully used to find new alleles or genes for leaf rust resistance (Dyck 1994), stripe rust resistance (Bansal et al. 2011), and root-lesion nematode resistance (Thompson and Seymour 2011). However, all of these are Mendelian traits, and the determination of the chromosomal locations for such traits is comparatively easy. A better genetic understanding of lC collections is necessary in order to dissect the architec-ture of complex traits.
In order to improve allele mining in the Watkins collec-tion it was genotyped with a set of 41 SSr markers, which was partly overlapping with the set used for the Gediflux col-lection. The current study reports on the results of phenotyp-ing and genotyping, the diversity of the Watkins collection and its genetic population structure. Comparisons to other bread wheat collections, particularly the Gediflux collection, are presented. Furthermore, the development of breeding resources, particularly of a core set of lCs, is reported.
Materials and methods
Plant material, growing conditions, and phenotyping
Seeds for the Watkins collection were received from the John Innes Centre Germplasm resource Unit (GrU http://www.jic.ac.uk/germplasm/). Single seed descend-ents (SSDs) were developed over 6 generations for all 826 lCs. Initially, four seeds were sown for each lC. In 234 cases, phenotypes from the same accession showed strik-ing differences in the first generation and, thus, two SSD streams were produced from those accessions, here called
1833Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
sister lines. All field trials were grown at Church Farm Bawburgh, norwich, UK (52.63°n, 1.18°e), under stand-ard growing conditions, if not stated differently. Trials with replicates were planted in a randomised block design The majority of SSDs, developed from original accessions of the Watkins collection, were planted in 2006 in four rep-licates of 1 m × 1 m field plots without nitrogen fertiliser usage. The following traits were measured: mature plant height, ear emergence, grain yield, lodging, vernalisation requirement, presence of awns, thousand grain weight, grain length, grain width and grain surface area. The Wat-kins core set (119 lCs) and the Gediflux collection were grown in 2011 in field plots of 1.5 m × 4 m (single plots) and 1 m × 1m (three replicates), respectively, and assessed for mature plant height (Gediflux only), peduncle and internode lengths (Gediflux only), ear emergence, grain yield, thousand grain weight, grain length, grain width and grain surface area. A trait mean was calculated for the varieties of the core set for each trait and both years, 2006 and 2011, with exception of the Watkins 2011 data, where only single plots were measured. For comparison of phe-notypic observations between those years, the 2006 data set values were adjusted to the 2011 level. Bi-parental SSD populations were developed for several lC accessions. For this the elite wheat cultivar ‘Paragon’ was crossed with selected Watkins lCs followed by four rounds of self pol-lination. The selection criterion for the lC parent was the display of a phenotype within the extreme borders of the phenotype range. Bi-parental populations were grown in 2011 for multiplication purposes in single 1 m × 1 m field plots and assessed for plant height and flowering times.
Genotyping
Genomic DnA was extracted from 3-week-old seedlings using the Dneasy 96 Plant Kit and protocol for fresh plant tissue (Qiagen). The genotyping of the Watkins collection was conducted using 41 publicly available SSr markers. Public primer sets were used from JIC (psp), IPK Gatersle-ben (gwm/gdm), Wheat Microsatellite Consortium (wmc), Beltsville Agricultural research Station (barc) and InrA (cfd/cfa) collections, and can be found on the GrainGenes website (http://www.wheat.pw.usda.gov/). Targeted mark-ers were selected to fall on different chromosomes accord-ing to a published consensus map (Somers et al. 2004). Initial marker tests on a limited number of varieties helped to identify markers that exhibit scorable, multiple alleles. These markers were given preference. See Table 1 for the names of the markers. There were 14 common mark-ers between the SSr marker set used here and the markers employed on the Gediflux collection.
Gene-based assays were conducted: the presence of the recessive vernalisation requirement alleles were tested with
allele specific assays for Vrn-A1 [three assays (Yan et al. 2004)], Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D1 [two assays each (Fu et al. 2005)]; the presence of the recessive photoperiod sensitiv-ity alleles were tested with allele specific assays for Ppd-A1c.1 [one assay (Wilhelm et al. 2008)], Ppd-B1a.1-3 [three assays (Díaz et al. 2012)] and Ppd-D1.a1 and Ppd-D1.c2 [two assays (Beales et al. 2007)].
Forward primers were labelled with the dyes FAM, VIC, neD, or PeT (Applied Biosystems) according to Schuelke (2000). PCr mixes were in 6.25 µl volumes that consisted of 3.125 µl HotstarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen), 0.75 µM of each primer, and 12.5 ng gDnA. The PCr profile con-sisted of 15 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of [95 °C for 1 min, a primer pair-dependent annealing temperature according to the GrainGenes website for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min], and concluded with 72 °C for 10 min. Products were measured on an ABI 3730 DnA Analyzer with a POP-7(TM) polymer column. Peak data were analysed using the manufacturers GeneMapper (version 4.0) software.
reactions that did not show an amplified product were repeated. A nUll allele was scored, if: (a) the repeat did not result in a PCr product; (b) the DnA quality was good, as could be seen from the scores of other markers; and (c) the number of missing amplifications for that marker was lower than 5 %. Otherwise, the data point was scored as missing.
Of the 41 SSr markers, 39 markers had a good score with less than 5% missing values after one round of re-genotyping of missing calls. Some of the markers detected more than one locus. If a clear separation between loci could be made, the marker was scored multiple times, otherwise only scores for the most consistent locus were taken. This resulted in genotypic information for 45 loci (see Table 1). The number of missing data per locus was on average 4.2, including eight loci with no missing data but with nUll alleles, and three loci with more than 20 % missing data. The latter loci were excluded from the advanced statistical analyses. Of the final marker set 14 markers were shared with the Gediflux collection.
Statistical analysis
Diversity statistics
The genetic diversity of a collection of cultivars was cal-culated using r software (vs. 3.02) (r Core Team 2013) for different common diversity indices (compare Table S1 for equations). The Shannon–Weaver Diversity Index on phenotype scores (dSWIp) was calculated when traits were measured in all three trials. For this, the overall phenotype range was divided into 12 phenotype classes of similar size. For each trial, the frequencies of scores in each class were determined. dSWIpwas calculated similar to dSWI(see Table S1) from these frequencies.
1834 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
Table 1 Summary of genotyping outcome and diversity statistics of the Watkins collection for 41 SSr markers binding to 45 loci in the bread wheat genome and six gene-based markers. equations for
diversity indices are given in Table S1. Mean and range are given over SSr marker loci only
Marker name chr Missing dAr drAr dr̂(g) dnei dPIC dSWI
barc019 3A 0.0 16 8 7.9 0.74 0.71 1.71
barc021 7A 2.7 16 6 8.4 0.58 0.57 1.46
barc029 7A 1.7 12 6 5.8 0.61 0.57 1.28
barc032 5B 0.9 16 5 9.9 0.83 0.81 2.06
barc096 6D 0.2 16 12 5.1 0.53 0.47 1.07
barc097 7BD5B 16.9 11 6 5.8 0.74 0.70 1.52
barc107 6A 0.9 14 8 6.2 0.50 0.46 1.12
barc110 5D 0.3 29 14 14.9 0.93 0.92 2.75
barc127 6B 0.4 19 12 8.2 0.83 0.81 1.97
barc134 6B 11.2 20 12 9.0 0.80 0.78 1.93
barc164 3B 0.1 29 16 13.3 0.86 0.85 2.42
barc172 7BD5B 0.0 11 3 6.8 0.77 0.74 1.67
barc240 1ABD5B 0.1 33 18 13.1 0.85 0.83 2.37
cfd079.a 3ABD 8.4 26 9 14.5 0.91 0.90 2.65
cfd079.b 3ABD 14.0 13 8 6.5 0.74 0.70 1.59
gdm111 1D 7.8 13 5 7.3 0.75 0.71 1.64
gdm129 4D 0.0 8 5 3.4 0.22 0.21 0.49
gwm003* 3D 0.0 16 9 7.2 0.69 0.66 1.56
gwm018* 1B 0.6 15 7 7.8 0.74 0.71 1.69
gwm030.a 2D3A 23.2 16 8 9.0 0.79 0.77 1.91
gwm030.b 2D3A 10.4 28 9 16.9 0.93 0.93 2.88
gwm046* 7B 1.6 28 10 15.1 0.91 0.91 2.71
gwm095* 2A 0.0 14 7 7.7 0.81 0.79 1.86
gwm155* 1D3A 0.5 24 13 10.1 0.80 0.78 2.01
gwm190* 5D 0.6 22 12 9.9 0.84 0.83 2.12
gwm213* 5B 1.5 46 19 23 0.96 0.95 3.38
gwm219* 6B 0.0 30 11 16.0 0.91 0.91 2.76
gwm291* 5A 13.0 29 12 15.0 0.87 0.86 2.56
gwm312* 2A 0.1 43 25 17.3 0.89 0.88 2.80
gwm337 1D 3.3 25 11 12.6 0.88 0.87 2.43
gwm357* 1A 0.1 11 4 6.1 0.73 0.69 1.53
gwm437* 7D 0.0 26 8 16.3 0.93 0.93 2.83
gwm456* 3D 0.1 18 7 10.1 0.84 0.82 2.10
gwm526.a 2B 3.7 7 3 4.2 0.62 0.58 1.18
gwm526.b 2B 3.5 15 6 8.5 0.77 0.74 1.80
gwm539 2D 0.4 61 34 23.5 0.96 0.96 3.45
gwm570* 6A 0.0 26 14 12.7 0.89 0.88 2.45
gwm608.a 2D4D6B 21.4 6 0 6.0 0.80 0.77 1.70
gwm608.c 2D4D6B 0.7 20 9 11.3 0.89 0.88 2.38
psp3100 1B 0.6 54 36 17.6 0.92 0.92 2.95
wmc093 1AD 1.1 9 7 2.7 0.51 0.39 0.78
wmc105 6B 4.1 40 20 18.5 0.91 0.90 2.90
wmc110 5A 22.4 3 0 2.7 0.34 0.29 0.59
wmc154 2B 0.6 38 28 11.5 0.78 0.76 2.11
wmc168 7A 12.3 34 14 15.3 0.80 0.79 2.40
mean (SSrs) 4.2 22.4 11.0 11.1 0.78 0.75 2.09
min (SSrs) 0.0 3 0 2.7 0.22 0.21 0.49
max (SSrs) 23.2 61 36 24.9 0.96 0.96 3.45
1835Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
Population structure
To investigate the population structure of the Watkins and the Gediflux collections, the Bayesian model-based cluster-ing method implemented in the programme STrUCTUre (Pritchard et al. 2000) was used. The full dataset from 1,054 lines was used, including all sister lines where present (234 cases). Settings for STrUCTUre were: admixture, burn-in period of 10,000 and runs of 50,000 steps. runs for numbers of founder populations between two and 25 were performed with 10 repetitions each. The number of ancestral clusters was determined by the δK statistic (evanno et al. 2005) using r software and package corrsieve (vs. 1.6–8).
Core set
A reduced set of lCs was initially selected from the diverse phenotypes. The diversity of the core was determined using the CoreHunter software (Thachuk et al. 2009) for differ-ent diversity indices: Cavalli-Sforza and edwards Distance, Modified rogers Distance, number of effective Alleles Index, and Shannon–Weaver Diversity Index (dSWI). For the final selection of the core set of accessions the dSWI was used, as the highest value of the genetic diversity averaged over the four diversity indices was achieved for this index.
Results
Phenotypic diversity
The phenotypic diversity of the Watkins collection has been assessed in field trials for the majority of lCs (726 accessions). Scores for the traits adult plant height, heading date, and four grain characteristics were taken (Table S2). A wide range of phenotype scores were found for the traits scored, as indicated by high diversity values (Shannon–Weaver phenotype diversity scores (dSWIp) between 1.37 and 2.03). Watkins lCs with extreme phenotypes for any
of the above traits were selected as parents for the devel-opment of bi-parental populations (Table S2). The collec-tion was also scored for vernalisation requirement: 86% of the lines showed spring growth habit, and only 14% winter growth habit.
In general the phenotypic variation observed in the Wat-kins collection was larger than that observed in a collection of european MCs, the Gediflux collection as indicated by dSWIp values between 0.97 and 1.74 for the same traits as measured for the Watkins collection (see Fig. 1 and com-pare Tables S2 and S3). The two collections displayed dif-ferent trends for most of the traits. In the Gediflux collec-tion the window of flowering times was smaller than in the Watkins collection. Similarly, in the Gediflux collection the mature plant height was lower, whereas the average thou-sand grain weight was high. As an exception in the traits observed, grain length values did not show a very different distribution between the two collections. In contrast, grain surface area and grain width were both higher in the Gedi-flux collection.
Genetic diversity
The genotypic scores on 45 loci reveal an average allele number per locus is 22.4, ranging from 3 to 61 alleles. The allele numbers for individual markers are listed in Table 1. The average dnei is 0.78, ranging from 0.22 to 0.96, the average dPIC is 0.75, ranging from 0.21 to 0.96, and the average dSWI is 2.09, ranging from 0.49 to 3.45. The diversity ranking of the markers is in general simi-lar for the diversity indices tested, with markers gwm539 and gwm213 being the most diverse. This indicates that all the diversity indices used were able to identify the genetic diversity present.
A comparison between SSD lines stemming from the same original lC accession but which showed phenotypical heterogeneity (234 cases or 28% of accessions) was con-ducted. This showed that on average 15.7 (35.7 %) of the markers had different allele sets between sister lines (SD
Table 1 continued
Ppd-A1 2A 3.4 3 1 1.2 0.14 0.13 0.29
Ppd-B1 2B 1.8 5 2 1.4 0.23 0.22 0.49
Ppd-D1 2D 0.0 7 2 2.0 0.61 0.56 1.16
Vrn-A1 5A 9.7 5 2 1.2 0.16 −1.25 0.4
Vrn-B1 5B 18.6 4 0 1.9 0.56 0.45 1.00
Vrn-D1 5D 18.1 4 1 1.5 0.29 0.27 0.60
Markers shared with Gediflux collection are indicated by a* after the marker name
chr putative chromosomal locations according to Gramene database (http://www.gramene.org/markers), dAR allele richness, dRAR number of rare alleles, dr̂(g) allele richness after rarefaction, dNei nei’s gene diversity, dPIC polymorphic information content, dSWI Shannon–Weaver Diversity Index
1836 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
10.6 markers, range 1–39 markers). This gives some indi-cation of the heterogeneity of the original lC accessions.
Using the genotype data generated by the Gediflux project (reeves et al. 2004), we were able to compare the diversity of the lC collection to a modern wheat col-lection. In the Gediflux collection, the average dPIC value is just 0.57 (see Table S4), much lower than that found in the Watkins collection (0.75). Similar observations can be made for nei’s gene diversity (dnei=0.62 vs. 0.78) and the
Shannon–Weaver Diversity Index (dSWI=1.30 vs. 2.09). Detailed results can be found in Table S4.
In order to understand the origin of the diversity better, the diversity of the three different wheat genomes were determined separately, by only using markers specific for single genomes. Average diversity values for A, B and D genome markers for the Watkins collection were found as dSWI: 1.79, 2.30 and 1.93 and dPIC : 0.68, 0.81 and 0.71, respectively. Values for the Gediflux collection are dSWI:
Fig. 1 Outlines of density func-tions created from phenotypic values for the following bread wheat collections or sets: Watkins 2006 (red, hashed); Gediflux 2011 (blue); Watkins core 2006 and 2011 (red, dotted and dot hashed, respectively); Watkins data fitted to 2011 conditions (orange). a Days to ear emergence [days after May 1st], b plant mature height [cm], c thousand grain weight [g], d grain length [cm], e grain surface area [cm2], f: grain width [cm]. Abbreviations: W Watkins, G Gediflux, 2006 and 2011 years collections were grown (colour figure online)
A B
C D
E F
1837Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
1.14, 1.47 and 1.07 and dPIC: 0.54, 0.68, 0.56, for the three different genomes, respectively. In both cases this sug-gests that the B genome is more diverse than the two other genomes. However, this analysis is based on 11, 13 and 11 markers, respectively, for the A, B and D genome in the Watkins collection only, and on 11, 14, and 10 markers, respectively, in the Gediflux collection. A simple bias due to analysing different marker numbers from each genome was excluded by calculating the mean diversity index from eight markers randomly selected from each genome, which resulted in near identical values (Watkins: dSWI: 1.72, 2.25 and 1.95 and dPIC: 0.67, 0.81 and 0.72 Gediflux: dSWI: 1.16, 1.43 and 1.07 and dPIC: 0.51, 0.62 and 0.50, respectively).
Population structure of the Watkins collection
An analysis to determine the population structure of the Watkins collection by Bayesian model-based cluster-ing (Pritchard et al. 2000) was undertaken, using the SSr genotype data. The number of ancestral groups was deter-mined by δK statistics (evanno et al. 2005). This analysis indicates a split of the collection into two ancestral groups or subpopulation (Fig. S1B). 85% of sister lines fell into the same subpopulation. A total of 424 of the accessions show more characteristics of group 1 and 630 of group 2. Although more Asian lCs are found in group 1 and more european lCs are in group 2, on the whole the groups are composed of accessions from different geographic regions. A further analysis was conducted on the next hierarchical level. This analysis addressed the structure within each of the two subpopulations and revealed that the smaller group was most likely formed from four ancestral subpopula-tions. The structure of the larger group is more obscure, but five being the most likely number of ancestral subpopula-tions (Fig. S1C and D, respectively). These groupings were aligned with the geographic region from which the lCs were collected, as shown in Fig. 2. Geographic origins could then be assigned from this alignment as follows: a russian (group 1.1), a Chinese/Indian (group 1.2), a Cen-tral/ east Asian (group 1.3), and a mixed european/Asian (group 1.4) group form the 424 lCs subpopulation. The 630 lCs strong subpopulation appear to comprise a South european/Asian (group 2.1), a northwest european (group 2.2), an east european (group 2.3), a South Mediterranean/African (group 2.4), and a north Mediterranean (group 2.5) group.
Population structure of the Gediflux collection
The determination of the population structure of the Gedi-flux collection by Bayesian model-based clustering, simi-lar to the analysis performed for the Watkins collection, revealed a main subdivision of the population into two
clusters (Fig. 3, top panel, and Fig. S2). These ancestral subpopulations were mainly supported by accessions either coming from the eU recommended list or from the UK national list, respectively. The analysis did also hold some support for the presence of 15 ancestral populations. (Fig. S2 B). The differences between these groups seem to be a combination of the decade of breeding and the geographic region, UK or eU. A further hierarchical analysis was not undertaken.
Core set
A core set of lCs from the Watkins collection was cho-sen to preserve the majority of the genetic diversity while reducing the numbers of lCs necessary to conduct trials. The selected core set contains 119 lCs and preserves 98 or 96% of the total genetic diversity, as detected by diver-sity measurements for the employed markers, dnei or dSWI, respectively. However, the number of alleles, particularly of rare alleles, is strongly reduced in the core set as can be seen from the DAr and DrAr values in Table 1 and S6. This could mean that the Core Set is not a suitable tool to identify very rare alleles. A detailed list of the accessions included in the core set can be found in Table S5 and the genetic diversity levels are summarised in Table S6.
Discussion
The present study reports on the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the Watkins bread wheat lCs collection of 826 accessions. regarding the former, a scoring of phenotypic values for basic traits was conducted. The phenotypic vari-ation observed in the Watkins collection was larger than that observed in a collection of european MCs, the Gedi-flux collection (compare Table S2 and S3 and Fig. 1). For most of the traits a clear trend between the two collections was observed. These trends will be the result of modern breeding strategies, which were employed in the devel-opment of MCs. Partly, trends will also reflect the differ-ences in geographic distribution. The Gediflux collection of winter wheat was adapted for a narrow geographic region, northwestern europe, in comparison to the Watkins collec-tion, which encompasses a near-global scale. Traits with a low genetic variability are not expected to show a trend. Trends were observed for plant height, flowering time and several grain characteristics, but not for grain length. A low genetic variability for this trait must be assumed. The window of flowering times was narrower in the Gediflux collection, and the mature plant height was reduced. These characteristics make the plants more adapted to modern farming under european growing conditions. In contrast, the average thousand grain weight, grain surface area and
1838 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
grain width were all increased in the modern collection, which seems likely to be a result of modern breeding for higher yields via larger seeds (Gegas et al. 2010).
A spring growth habit under the north european spring sowing conditions was observed for 86% of the Watkins lCs studied. Of those lCs which showed spring growth habit, 178 accessions (24%) did not carry a spring type alleles at any of the three Vrn-1 loci. This may be partly due to the UK conditions allowing weak winter types to get vernalised due to cold nights in March. However, given the high number of cases, this suggests that another path-way leading to a spring growth habit may be responsible in some of those lCs. Up to five vernalisation genes have been reported for winter wheat to date, but so far mainly the three Vrn-1 homeologues have been well investigated (Distelfeld et al. 2009). The identification of lCs with Vrn-1-independent spring growth habit could help to dis-cover more details of the vernalisation pathway in wheat. The genetic diversity found for the Vrn-1 and Ppd-1 genes
was low. This is expected as these genes were most likely under selection as they play a major role in adaptation to the local climate. Due to selection pressure, the number of alleles would be low in the progenitor plants. Moreover, the genotyping using gene-based markers only revealed the presence of known alleles. Further alleles present, will not be detected.
The genotyping of the Watkins collection, using 41 SSr markers was followed by an analysis of the genetic diver-sity levels present at the marker loci. A high level of genetic diversity was detected irrespectively of the index of diver-sity used (see Table 1). An average allele number of 22.4 and a gene diversity index (dPIC) of 0.75 were found. These values are at the higher end of those found in other wheat lC collections (see Table S7 for a list of published studies). The genetic diversity of the IPK bread wheat collection of 998 lCs from 68 countries was reported as an average allele number of 18.1 per locus and a dPIC of 0.77 (Huang et al. 2002) (see also Table S7). The InrA collection
Fig. 2 a The world map. Countries from which lCs were acquired are coloured. Colours are organised in geographic regions. b STrUCTUre assignment of the Watkins lCs to ancestral populations. Three panels shown. Top panel whole collection; middle and lower panel the 424 and 630 subpopu-lations of the whole collection, respectively. each panel is divided into three rows. Top row assignment to ancestral popula-tion; middle row ancestral characteristics of each line; bot-tom row colour code of country/region of origin. Abbreviated names of the lCs are given below the bottom row. c Colour code of the countries, according to geographic regions
AAE Watkins: Countries of Origin − Regions
AfghanistanAustraliaBulgariaBrazilCanary IslandsChinaCreteCyprusAlgeriaEgyptSpainEthiopiaFinlandFranceUKGreeceHungaryIndiaIranIraqItalyMoroccoYugoslaviaMyanmarIsraelPolandPortugalRomaniaSyriaTunisiaTurkeyUSSR
B
316.
4CH
N62
7.1I
RN
505.
1IR
N63
2.1I
RN
632.
2IR
N70
7.2I
ND
810.
1SU
N31
6.1C
HN
769.
4DZ
A81
0.3S
UN
242.
1IN
D80
5.1S
UN
809.
1SU
N82
8.1C
HN
812.
1CH
N48
5.2D
ZA
815.
473
1.1I
ND
815.
182
0.1C
HN
708.
1IN
D50
6.1I
RN
501.
1IR
Q31
9.1C
HN
568.
1CH
N82
9.3C
HN
827.
1CH
N62
9.1I
RN
823.
1CH
N67
1.1S
UN
658.
1CH
N67
1.2S
UN
694.
3IN
D82
4.1C
HN
702.
1IR
N58
9.1C
HN
657.
1CH
N82
9.4C
HN
828.
4CH
N81
3.1I
ND
449.
1RO
U58
8.1C
HN
392.
1PR
T50
8.2
704.
1IR
N69
4.2I
ND
625.
1IR
N39
9.1C
HN
429.
1IN
D78
6.1S
UN
633.
3IN
D70
6.1I
ND
695.
1CH
N67
8.1I
RN
577.
2IR
N50
8.4
813.
3IN
D60
5.2G
RC
199.
1IN
D59
1.1P
RT
773.
2SU
N73
4.3S
UN
734.
1SU
N81
6.1I
TA5 0
2.3M
MR
433.
1IN
D5 0
3.1M
MR
479.
1PO
L79
4.1S
UN
626.
1IR
N72
9.1I
RN
768.
1IN
D79
4.3S
UN
806.
1ITA
377.
1IR
N47
5.1A
FG
773.
1SU
N69
6.1I
ND
400.
1CH
N63
1.1I
RN
605.
1GR
C24
1.2I
ND
721.
1CH
N74
5.1S
UN
308.
1IR
N78
8.1S
UN
674.
1IR
Q48
9.1S
UN
700.
1CH
N46
9.1A
FG
675.
3TU
N67
3.1S
UN
767.
1SU
N82
5.3C
HN
430.
1IN
D64
3.1I
ND
88.1
PO
L58
0.1I
RN
793.
3SU
N41
9.1I
ND
711.
1IN
D66
8.1Y
UG
516.
1IN
D71
0.1I
ND
780.
2SU
N78
7.3S
UN
423.
2IN
D71
4.1I
ND
476.
2AF
G64
9.1C
HN
421.
1IN
D73
2.2I
ND
413.
1IN
D74
7.1E
TH
415.
1IN
D24
6.1I
ND
692.
1IN
D59
.1P
RT
424.
4IN
D44
1.1C
HN
763.
1IN
D77
5.3S
UN
825.
4CH
N43
5.1C
HN
564.
1GR
C78
9.2S
UN
300.
1TU
R41
3.3I
ND
513.
1IR
N64
5.1I
ND
819.
1CH
N81
9.3C
HN
775.
2SU
N77
6.1S
UN
646.
1IN
D76
9.2D
ZA
748.
1SU
N77
1.1S
UN
404.
2IR
N46
6.3A
FG
427.
1IN
D78
3.1S
UN
473.
1AF
G70
3.1C
HN
478.
1AF
G58
3.1C
HN
528.
1CH
N72
6.1C
HN
733.
1IR
N41
8.1I
ND
701.
1IR
N72
8.2I
RQ
152.
1PR
T77
7.1F
IN65
5.1C
HN
811.
1TU
N47
4.1A
FG
521.
2IN
D66
1.1S
UN
426.
1IN
D74
6.1S
UN
797.
1SU
N79
8.1S
UN
633.
2IN
D48
7.1S
UN
749.
2SU
N75
2.1S
UN
715.
3IN
D58
6.4C
HN
675.
1TU
N32
5.1G
BR
511.
1IN
D73
8.1S
UN
457.
2AF
G58
4.2C
HN
273.
1ES
P79
0.1S
UN
564.
3GR
C19
8.4I
ND
730.
1IN
D72
0.1C
HN
779.
4SU
N72
8.1I
RQ
653.
1CH
N65
9.1C
HN
409.
1IN
D67
9.1I
RN
792.
1SU
N36
3.1Y
UG
697.
1IN
D37
5.1I
RN
318.
1CH
N35
7.2Y
UG
410.
2IN
D40
7.1I
ND
234.
3YU
G23
5.4G
RC
234.
4YU
G71
5.1I
ND
321.
1CH
N32
7.1P
LE29
0.1C
RE
155.
1PR
T44
0.4C
HN
279.
1ES
P27
8.2E
SP
499.
1TU
R80
3.1I
ND
650.
3CH
N50
4.1C
HN
526.
3IN
D15
5.4P
RT
458.
2AF
G37
6.3I
RN
393.
1PR
T59
6.3P
RT
582.
1CH
N65
6.1C
HN
772.
1SU
N39
4.1P
RT
363.
3YU
G81
8.2C
HN
378.
1IR
N14
.2Y
UG
5 02.
2MM
R35
3.1Y
UG
660.
1CH
N86
.2IN
D37
8.4I
RN
584.
1CH
N81
7.1C
HN
727.
1CH
N64
5.2I
ND
719.
1CH
N38
1.1I
ND
604.
2ES
P87
.1IN
D44
0.1C
HN
610.
1YU
G77
2.4S
UN
243.
4IN
D46
6.4A
FG
556.
4CA
I62
8.2I
RN
713.
1IN
D35
3.3Y
UG
749.
1SU
N14
.1Y
UG
324.
1CH
N36
0.1Y
UG
606.
1GR
C38
2.1I
ND
817.
2CH
N29
9.1T
UR
302.
130
3.1
323.
1CH
N33
5.1
406.
1IN
D56
.1E
SP
207.
2IR
N48
6.1S
UN
30.3
AU
S64
8.1C
HN
235.
3GR
C57
6.1I
RN
647.
1CH
N52
2.4I
ND
641.
2IN
D68
0.1I
TA40
7.2I
ND
406.
3IN
D90
3.1I
ND
507.
3AU
S57
3.1T
UR
500.
1IR
Q51
8.1I
ND
522.
1IN
D80
8.2S
UN
243.
2IN
D38
6.1E
SP
568.
4CH
N59
4.2P
RT
615.
2YU
G36
2.1Y
UG
594.
3PR
T20
9.1E
GY
39.3
ITA
298.
1TU
R12
7.1I
ND
208.
2IN
D40
8.2I
ND
319.
2CH
N32
0.3C
HN
497.
4MA
R39
9.2C
HN
556.
1CA
I40
3.1E
SP
424.
1IN
D64
4.1I
ND
596.
4PR
T32
7.4P
LE16
6.3I
ND
244.
3IN
D78
9.3S
UN
784.
1ITA
793.
4SU
N20
8.1I
ND
408.
4IN
D57
2.2T
UR
761.
1SU
N23
7.4I
RN
296.
1TU
R37
9.1I
RN
420.
1IN
D44
6.1C
HN
615.
4YU
G37
1.2Y
UG
720.
4CH
N45
6.1A
FG
524.
2IN
D38
2.2I
ND
718.
1CH
N30
.1A
US
611.
1YU
G15
3.1P
RT
403.
4ES
P57
4.1T
UR
376.
2IR
N42
8.2I
ND
570.
1GR
C80
2.1S
UN
493.
1TU
N28
1.1G
RC
344.
1ES
P27
8.3E
SP
826.
1CH
N27
1.1E
SP
684.
1IR
N56
6.1G
RC
405.
1IR
N65
0.2C
HN
593.
1PR
T24
2.3I
ND
818.
3CH
N80
8.4S
UN
689.
1ES
P59
5.1P
RT
523.
1IN
D57
7.1I
RN
126.
1IN
D16
8.1C
HN
523.
3IN
D79
.1IN
D57
9.1I
RN
135.
1AU
S76
0.1S
UN
572.
1TU
R64
2.2I
ND
448.
1RO
U51
2.1I
ND
628.
3IR
N58
5.2C
HN
569.
1GR
C58
7.1C
HN
439.
1CH
N76
4.1I
ND
814.
1TU
N56
5.1G
RC
774.
2ET
H35
8.3Y
UG
526.
2IN
D17
7.1P
RT
297.
1TU
R52
4.3I
ND
423.
1IN
D73
9.1I
ND
237.
2IR
N76
5.4S
UN
488.
1SU
N56
1.1C
RE
416.
1IN
D28
2.1G
RC
613.
1YU
G73
0.4I
ND
238.
1IR
N54
7.1E
SP
342.
2ES
P79
5.2S
UN
795.
1SU
N46
5.1A
FG
557.
1CA
I34
.1IN
D80
7.1S
UN
32.1
IND
128.
1IN
D53
2.1T
UN
509.
1PR
T32
2.1C
HN
137.
1AU
S80
4.4S
UN
774.
4ET
H4.
1IR
Q31
4.1C
HN
124.
1IN
D75
5.1S
UN
503.
2MM
R72
5.1C
HN
787.
1SU
N41
0.1I
ND
536.
2MA
R24
0.2I
RN
114.
2YU
G22
7.4E
SP
434.
1CH
N23
6.1G
RC
465.
4AF
G35
2.1Y
UG
317.
2CH
N40
2.1G
RC
248.
1IN
D46
1.1A
FG
559.
1ES
P38
.1P
OL
37.1
PO
L79
9.2S
UN
37.3
PO
L25
4.1M
AR
312.
1IR
N3 1
3.2M
MR
3 13.
1MM
R13
.2B
GR
91.2
IND
13.1
BG
R79
9.4S
UN
911.
1HU
N13
1.2E
SP
309.
2IR
N33
7.1H
UN
35.1
PO
L77
.1Y
UG
311.
1IR
N18
1.1P
OL
40.3
FR
A31
1.2I
RN
309.
1IR
N18
7.1I
TA19
3.1F
RA
76.1
YU
G36
.4P
OL
759.
2SU
N31
2.2I
RN
52.1
ES
P73
6.2S
UN
736.
3SU
N35
5.1Y
UG
636.
2TU
N63
4.1H
UN
181.
2PO
L24
5.1A
US
156.
1YU
G80
0.1S
UN
326.
1AU
S65
2.2C
HN
268.
1ES
P40
.1F
RA
217.
1MA
R44
5.1C
HN
188.
4FR
A19
1.1F
RA
130.
1ES
P6.
3AU
S6.
4AU
S25
.1A
US
134.
1AU
S13
1.1E
SP
758.
293
.1IN
D80
0.3S
UN
756.
2ITA
78.1
YU
G76
.3Y
UG
759.
4SU
N78
0.4S
UN
178.
4YU
G15
4.1P
RT
156.
4YU
G62
2.2B
GR
165.
1IN
D57
.4P
RT
115.
3YU
G75
3.2S
UN
249.
1IN
D21
3.1M
AR
74.2
YU
G50
.1E
SP
67.1
ES
P80
1.2S
UN
84.1
ES
P41
.4F
RA
134.
3AU
S38
7.2E
SP
105.
2FR
A80
1.3S
UN
200.
1FR
A37
3.1I
RN
216.
1MA
R36
.2P
OL
60.2
PR
T42
.1F
RA
75.1
YU
G18
5.1I
TA17
2.2I
ND
73.1
BG
R75
.4Y
UG
368.
1YU
G21
1.4F
RA
174.
1IN
D30
7.3I
RN
52.3
ES
P19
7.4I
ND
280.
1ES
P16
2.1E
SP
84.4
ES
P25
8.3M
AR
612.
1YU
G33
1.4B
RA
266.
1ES
P18
0.1E
SP
174.
4IN
D14
1.2C
HN
741.
1AF
G65
2.1C
HN
261.
1CA
I54
.1E
SP
307.
1IR
N10
.1IN
D55
1.1E
SP
5.1A
US
205.
1IN
D19
2.1F
RA
165.
3IN
D33
0.1E
GY
163.
1ES
P59
9.1P
RT
496.
1MA
R39
.1IT
A49
4.1E
SP
329.
2EG
Y43
8.4C
HN
331.
2BR
A54
1.4E
SP
270.
1ES
P7.
1AU
S43
8.3C
HN
411.
1IN
D20
4.4I
ND
27.1
AU
S22
5.1C
AI
436.
1CH
N75
4.1S
UN
490.
1FR
A20
4.3I
ND
206.
3IN
D60
2.4E
SP
259.
1MA
R96
.1R
OU
161.
1ES
P48
.1E
SP
116.
1ES
P11
0.1F
RA
495.
1MA
R44
.3M
AR
621.
1BG
R25
5.1T
UN
195.
1IN
D59
2.1P
RT
158.
2GR
C63
6.3T
UN
211.
3FR
A27
2.1E
SP
355.
2YU
G73
5.1D
ZA
16.1
ES
P1.
2MA
R17
6.1A
FG
284.
1GR
C46
0.1A
FG
61.1
ES
P28
5.1G
RC
688.
1ES
P64
0.1I
RN
89.1
AU
S11
.1IN
D37
2.1Y
UG
491.
2FR
A17
8.3Y
UG
179.
1GR
C25
0.1C
HN
2.1C
RE
194.
1FR
A34
5.1B
GR
49.1
ES
P71
2.4I
ND
129.
1IN
D12
3.2A
US
95.1
CH
N10
5.1F
RA
201.
1ES
P94
.1IN
D15
9.1B
GR
766.
1DZ
A74
4.4I
ND
515.
1IR
N99
.1P
OL
182.
1PO
L35
7.3Y
UG
167.
1IN
D34
5.3B
GR
202.
1ES
P10
4.1I
TA27
6.1E
SP
115.
1YU
G39
1.1P
RT
107.
1FR
A12
9.2I
ND
17.2
ES
P54
8.1E
SP
651.
1CH
N21
5.1M
AR
138.
1AU
S60
7.1Y
UG
340.
1ES
P17
.4E
SP
169.
1CH
N44
7.3C
HN
330.
4EG
Y36
5.1Y
UG
367.
3BG
R80
4.1S
UN
602.
2ES
P62
2.1B
GR
190.
1FR
A14
9.1G
BR
197.
1IN
D39
5.1P
RT
447.
4CH
N75
3.1S
UN
167.
2IN
D49
1.1F
RA
370.
1YU
G28
.1A
US
206.
1IN
D32
9.3E
GY
227.
3ES
P34
3.2E
SP
190.
2FR
A74
4.1I
ND
315.
1CH
N78
1.1S
UN
220.
1ES
P66
6.4A
FG
454.
1AF
G44
.1M
AR
79.2
IND
283.
1GR
C15
8.1G
RC
70.1
ES
P17
3.1A
US
19.1
IND
139.
1FR
A75
6.1I
TA31
0.1I
RN
21.1
IND
214.
1MA
R61
7.1Y
UG
638.
1CR
E43
7.1C
HN
96.3
RO
U21
.2IN
D45
0.3R
OU
72.9
YU
G69
.2E
SP
18.1
IND
635.
4HU
N56
0.1G
RC
212.
1MA
R16
9.4C
HN
160.
2ES
P11
.2IN
D14
6.1E
SP
388.
1ES
P45
1.1R
OU
100.
1PO
L16
4.1I
ND
437.
3CH
N25
1.1A
US
110.
4FR
A12
2.1A
US
252.
1DZ
A27
4.1E
SP
257.
3TU
N14
0.1T
UR
218.
1TU
N60
9.1Y
UG
337.
2HU
N20
.1IN
D23
9.1E
SP
637.
1TU
R25
3.1M
AR
669.
4CH
N72
.1Y
UG
722.
1CH
N51
9.3I
ND
537.
1TU
N33
4.1
553.
4CA
I97
.1P
OL
662.
1RO
U17
5.3C
HN
184.
1PO
L74
2.1D
ZA
90.1
AU
S26
4.1C
AI
256.
2TU
N67
2.1P
OL
142.
1MA
R26
2.1C
AI
354.
1YU
G54
2.1E
SP
47.1
ES
P63
9.1C
RE
10.2
IND
510.
1PR
T22
.1A
US
288.
1CR
E55
3.2C
AI
385.
2ES
P68
2.1C
RE
494.
3ES
P63
.4E
SP
590.
1PR
T54
9.1E
SP
145.
1ES
P12
5.1I
ND
289.
1CR
E53
0.1A
FG
390.
1PR
T11
7.1E
SP
635.
1HU
N14
4.1E
SP
304.
133
8.3H
UN
269.
1ES
P25
8.1M
AR
15.2
YU
G66
.1E
SP
359.
1YU
G33
2.1
23.1
AU
S26
5.1C
AI
15.4
YU
G67
0.4P
OL
179.
4GR
C54
5.1E
SP
630.
1IR
N17
0.1C
HN
45.1
SY
R34
8.1B
GR
175.
2CH
N65
4.3C
HN
751.
2SU
N20
3.1I
ND
396.
1PR
T34
6.1B
GR
397.
1PR
T31
0.2I
RN
222.
1CR
E28
7.2C
RE
904.
1ES
P75
0.3S
UN
618.
2YU
G75
0.1S
UN
103.
1ITA
257.
2TU
N63
.2E
SP
230.
1PR
T49
8.1T
UR
119.
2IN
D37
4.3I
RN
600.
1ES
P46
7.1A
FG
545.
4ES
P53
.1E
SP
186.
1ITA
248.
2IN
D74
0.2S
UN
24.1
AU
S98
.1P
OL
751.
1SU
N14
7.1I
RQ
620.
1YU
G58
1.1I
RN
33.1
IND
737.
1ITA
138.
2AU
S33
8.1H
UN
546.
1ES
P12
3.1A
US
481.
1PO
L27
7.1E
SP
66.2
ES
P29
5.1T
UR
260.
1CA
I48
4.1I
TA25
6.1T
UN
301.
1TU
R12
0.1A
US
396.
4PR
T34
9.1B
GR
71.1
BG
R60
.1P
RT
608.
2YU
G56
2.1G
RC
229.
1PR
T22
1.1E
SP
762.
4DZ
A46
2.2A
FG
712.
2IN
D20
7.4I
RN
333.
155
.1E
SP
644.
4IN
D42
5.1I
ND
732.
1IN
D46
.3C
RE
603.
1ES
P12
.1IN
D62
4.3B
GR
779.
1SU
N52
0.1I
ND
102.
1ITA
112.
2TU
R67
0.1P
OL
608.
1YU
G62
4.4B
GR
519.
1IN
D65
.1E
SP
665.
2AF
G13
3.1A
US
Com
1ES
P10
1.1I
TA85
.1E
SP
68.1
ES
P9.
3PR
T22
4.3C
HN
477.
1PR
T40
1.1P
RT
189.
2FR
A21
0.1I
ND
219.
1ES
P12
1.1A
US
291.
1CY
P45
5.3A
FG
183.
1PO
L45
9.1A
FG
535.
3TU
N45
3.1A
FG
716.
1IN
D14
3.1E
SP
717.
1CH
N36
9.2Y
UG
497.
1MA
R57
8.1I
RN
468.
1AF
G43
.1T
UN
455.
2AF
G22
8.1E
SP
616.
1YU
G38
9.1P
RT
108.
1FR
A61
6.2Y
UG
69.1
ES
P44
4.4C
HN
598.
1PR
T52
7.2I
ND
232.
1IN
D34
7.1B
GR
157.
1YU
G64
1.1I
ND
2 23.
1MM
R11
9.1I
ND
244.
2IN
D53
1.1E
SP
150.
1GB
R57
1.1T
UR
81.1
IND
663.
1RO
U64
.1E
SP
538.
1TU
N46
.1C
RE
667.
1AF
G55
5.1E
SP
150.
4GB
R62
.1E
SP
361.
1YU
G18
9.1F
RA
492.
1ES
P62
0.4Y
UG
106.
1FR
A33
6.1H
UN
514.
2IR
N52
7.3I
ND
9.4P
RT
778.
1ITA
436.
2CH
N41
2.3I
ND
398.
1PLE
143.
4ES
P41
7.1I
ND
822.
2CH
N78
2.3S
UN
136.
1AU
S13
2.1A
US
654.
4CH
N22
6.1E
SP
8.1P
RT
586.
2CH
N64
2.3I
ND
685.
1ES
P46
3.1A
FG
676.
3TU
N45
7.1A
FG
26.1
AU
S66
4.1A
FG
109.
1FR
A58
.2P
RT
233.
1IN
D59
0.2P
RT
452.
2AF
G11
3.1E
SP
597.
1PR
T41
4.1I
ND
171.
1CH
N53
9.1E
SP
543.
2ES
P54
4.1E
SP
471.
1AF
G53
4.1M
AR
676.
4TU
N75
7.4I
TA75
7.1I
TA80
.1IN
D60
1.1E
SP
770.
1SU
N31
7.1C
HN
563.
1CR
E54
1.3E
SP
231.
2HU
N52
9.1A
FG
148.
1AU
S19
6.4I
ND
118.
1PR
T55
0.2E
SP
51.1
ES
P67
9.2I
RN
198.
3IN
D72
3.1A
FG
533.
1MA
R30
5.1E
GY
240.
3IR
N79
6.2S
UN
224.
4CH
N44
2.1C
HN
372.
2YU
G92
.2IN
D29
.1A
US
58.1
PR
T52
5.1I
ND
619.
1YU
G15
1.1P
RT
480.
1PO
L69
0.1G
RC
294.
1TU
R38
7.1E
SP
231.
3HU
N47
2.1A
FG
507.
1AU
S44
3.1C
HN
292.
1CY
P36
6.1Y
UG
444.
3CH
N48
8.3S
UN
534.
2MA
R11
1.1M
AR
293.
1TU
R61
4.1Y
UG
351.
1YU
G37
4.2I
RN
412.
1IN
D38
3.1G
RC
540.
1ES
P27
5.1E
SP
683.
1ES
P61
4.3Y
UG
912.
3HU
N83
.1E
SP
687.
1TU
N55
8.1C
AI
422.
1IN
D33
9.1P
RT
328.
4EG
Y82
1.1C
HN
Com
4TU
R45
8.4A
FG
263.
1CA
I92
.1IN
D28
6.1G
RC
762.
2DZ
A28
7.1C
RE
356.
1YU
G48
3.1P
OL
380.
1IR
N34
1.1E
SP
450.
4RO
U68
1.1I
RN
693.
1IR
Q24
7.1I
ND
567.
1GR
C38
4.1G
RC
533.
2MA
R43
1.1I
ND
470.
1AF
G32
8.1E
GY
315.
2CH
N36
4.1Y
UG
166.
4IN
D35
8.1Y
UG
724.
1IN
D76
5.1S
UN
432.
1IN
D62
3.3B
GR
482.
1PO
L68
6.1M
AR
677.
2ES
P69
1.1G
RC
725.
4CH
N74
3.1S
UN
128.
2IN
D91
2.4H
UN
464.
1AF
G55
2.2C
AI
82.1
IND
517.
4IN
D55
4.1C
AI
768.
1IN
D77
5.3S
UN
789.
2SU
N77
5.2S
UN
780.
2SU
N78
3.1S
UN
789.
3SU
N81
5.4
815.
179
0.1S
UN
605.
1GR
C47
5.1A
FG
769.
4DZ
A77
9.4S
UN
605.
2GR
C79
2.1S
UN
476.
2AF
G78
6.1S
UN
671.
1SU
N67
1.2S
UN
720.
4CH
N24
1.2I
ND
308.
1IR
N37
6.2I
RN
747.
1ET
H74
8.1S
UN
749.
2SU
N74
9.1S
UN
379.
1IR
N78
7.1S
UN
793.
4SU
N79
8.1S
UN
746.
1SU
N80
8.4S
UN
797.
1SU
N76
1.1S
UN
760.
1SU
N78
7.3S
UN
807.
1SU
N79
3.3S
UN
576.
1IR
N80
8.2S
UN
788.
1SU
N37
5.1I
RN
828.
1CH
N82
9.3C
HN
812.
1CH
N65
9.1C
HN
827.
1CH
N64
7.1C
HN
776.
1SU
N81
9.3C
HN
819.
1CH
N77
7.1F
IN82
0.1C
HN
825.
3CH
N82
5.4C
HN
660.
1CH
N64
5.2I
ND
813.
1IN
D65
5.1C
HN
701.
1IR
N71
5.1I
ND
824.
1CH
N77
1.1S
UN
316.
1CH
N71
5.3I
ND
784.
1ITA
823.
1CH
N44
6.1C
HN
818.
2CH
N82
6.1C
HN
629.
1IR
N65
7.1C
HN
658.
1CH
N64
5.1I
ND
440.
4CH
N65
6.1C
HN
818.
3CH
N39
.3IT
A58
3.1C
HN
811.
1TU
N65
3.1C
HN
448.
1RO
U64
9.1C
HN
694.
2IN
D64
6.1I
ND
694.
3IN
D44
0.1C
HN
813.
3IN
D82
8.4C
HN
829.
4CH
N73
4.3S
UN
734.
1SU
N31
6.4C
HN
643.
1IN
D12
8.1I
ND
627.
1IR
N40
0.1C
HN
449.
1RO
U39
9.1C
HN
816.
1ITA
803.
1IN
D80
4.4S
UN
523.
3IN
D32
0.3C
HN
684.
1IR
N16
8.1C
HN
580.
1IR
N52
2.1I
ND
720.
1CH
N80
2.1S
UN
593.
1PR
T61
5.4Y
UG
565.
1GR
C40
6.1I
ND
406.
3IN
D27
1.1E
SP
615.
2YU
G67
4.1I
RQ
568.
4CH
N56
9.1G
RC
589.
1CH
N50
6.1I
RN
577.
2IR
N28
2.1G
RC
278.
2ES
P29
9.1T
UR
588.
1CH
N56
4.3G
RC
631.
1IR
N49
9.1T
UR
300.
1TU
R56
4.1G
RC
505.
1IR
N62
5.1I
RN
626.
1IR
N71
9.1C
HN
279.
1ES
P72
1.1C
HN
419.
1IN
D50
8.2
773.
1SU
N17
7.1P
RT
570.
1GR
C27
3.1E
SP
435.
1CH
N67
3.1S
UN
568.
1CH
N58
5.2C
HN
497.
4MA
R24
6.1I
ND
378.
4IR
N50
8.4
518.
1IN
D70
4.1I
RN
407.
2IN
D77
3.2S
UN
703.
1CH
N52
6.3I
ND
322.
1CH
N59
6.4P
RT
5 02.
3MM
R58
4.1C
HN
290.
1CR
E71
8.1C
HN
586.
4CH
N59
6.3P
RT
711.
1IN
D42
0.1I
ND
814.
1TU
N76
7.1S
UN
504.
1CH
N37
8.1I
RN
153.
1PR
T52
6.2I
ND
582.
1CH
N64
8.1C
HN
318.
1CH
N40
7.1I
ND
428.
2IN
D50
9.1P
RT
644.
1IN
D43
4.1C
HN
381.
1IN
D44
1.1C
HN
321.
1CH
N20
9.1E
GY
314.
1CH
N59
1.1P
RT
243.
2IN
D41
3.1I
ND
198.
4IN
D58
7.1C
HN
413.
3IN
D76
9.2D
ZA
679.
1IR
N70
2.1I
RN
426.
1IN
D41
5.1I
ND
317.
2CH
N67
8.1I
RN
633.
2IN
D59
4.3P
RT
474.
1AF
G70
7.2I
ND
473.
1AF
G33
5.1
427.
1IN
D37
7.1I
RN
697.
1IN
D24
0.2I
RN
574.
1TU
R23
8.1I
RN
297.
1TU
R67
5.1T
UN
774.
2ET
H24
4.3I
ND
774.
4ET
H62
8.3I
RN
56.1
ES
P62
8.2I
RN
675.
3TU
N24
2.3I
ND
404.
2IR
N40
3.4E
SP
487.
1SU
N63
3.3I
ND
296.
1TU
R37
6.3I
RN
327.
4PLE
632.
2IR
N46
9.1A
FG
242.
1IN
D30
2.1
632.
1IR
N30
3.1
479.
1PO
L60
6.1G
RC
234.
3YU
G23
5.4G
RC
234.
4YU
G40
2.1G
RC
235.
3GR
C61
3.1Y
UG
237.
4IR
N20
8.1I
ND
236.
1GR
C20
8.2I
ND
137.
1AU
S60
4.2E
SP
745.
1SU
N42
4.4I
ND
237.
2IR
N68
0.1I
TA45
7.2A
FG
730.
4IN
D12
4.1I
ND
572.
1TU
R20
7.2I
RN
708.
1IN
D48
8.1S
UN
733.
1IR
N15
5.4P
RT
572.
2TU
R42
9.1I
ND
126.
1IN
D15
5.1P
RT
731.
1IN
D42
4.1I
ND
409.
1IN
D14
.1Y
UG
14.2
YU
G52
3.1I
ND
485.
2DZ
A35
3.1Y
UG
325.
1GB
R79
4.3S
UN
324.
1CH
N39
9.2C
HN
729.
1IR
N32
3.1C
HN
521.
2IN
D35
3.3Y
UG
352.
1YU
G79
4.1S
UN
32.1
IND
34.1
IND
512.
1IN
D90
3.1I
ND
713.
1IN
D73
0.1I
ND
421.
1IN
D69
6.1I
ND
732.
2IN
D61
0.1Y
UG
522.
4IN
D31
9.1C
HN
528.
1CH
N81
7.1C
HN
166.
3IN
D40
3.1E
SP
772.
1SU
N57
9.1I
RN
772.
4SU
N40
5.1I
RN
641.
2IN
D45
6.1A
FG
642.
2IN
D59
4.2P
RT
706.
1IN
D50
3.1M
MR
728.
2IR
Q48
6.1S
UN
500.
1IR
Q50
1.1I
RQ
243.
4IN
D5 0
2.2M
MR
817.
2CH
N72
7.1C
HN
298.
1TU
R43
3.1I
ND
199.
1IN
D30
.1A
US
595.
1PR
T34
2.2E
SP
752.
1SU
N22
7.4E
SP
278.
3ES
P73
8.1S
UN
410.
1IN
D87
.1IN
D73
9.1I
ND
358.
3YU
G72
5.1C
HN
532.
1TU
N69
2.1I
ND
371.
2YU
G56
1.1C
RE
135.
1AU
S36
3.3Y
UG
127.
1IN
D70
0.1C
HN
511.
1IN
D36
3.1Y
UG
466.
3AF
G86
.2IN
D53
6.2M
AR
524.
2IN
D42
3.1I
ND
714.
1IN
D72
8.1I
RQ
695.
1CH
N46
1.1A
FG
357.
2YU
G51
6.1I
ND
392.
1PR
T71
0.1I
ND
584.
2CH
N66
8.1Y
UG
248.
1IN
D39
3.1P
RT
114.
2YU
G52
4.3I
ND
458.
2AF
G49
3.1T
UN
410.
2IN
D68
9.1E
SP
394.
1PR
T57
3.1T
UR
547.
1ES
P42
3.2I
ND
559.
1ES
P66
1.1S
UN
5 03.
2MM
R76
3.1I
ND
557.
1CA
I51
3.1I
RN
507.
3AU
S34
4.1E
SP
765.
4SU
N30
.3A
US
362.
1YU
G36
0.1Y
UG
556.
4CA
I56
6.1G
RC
556.
1CA
I76
4.1I
ND
489.
1SU
N65
0.2C
HN
430.
1IN
D38
2.2I
ND
465.
1AF
G32
7.1P
LE47
8.1A
FG
408.
2IN
D57
7.1I
RN
319.
2CH
N79
.1IN
D38
6.1E
SP
59.1
PR
T46
6.4A
FG
408.
4IN
D4.
1IR
Q79
5.1S
UN
795.
2SU
N41
6.1I
ND
465.
4AF
G75
5.1S
UN
88.1
PO
L61
1.1Y
UG
806.
1ITA
152.
1PR
T43
9.1C
HN
382.
1IN
D41
8.1I
ND
810.
3SU
N81
0.1S
UN
726.
1CH
N80
5.1S
UN
650.
3CH
N80
9.1S
UN
281.
1GR
C
193.
1FR
A31
3.1M
MR
313.
2MM
R31
2.1I
RN
164.
1IN
D77
.1Y
UG
48.1
ES
P49
.1E
SP
165.
1IN
D16
1.1E
SP
158.
2GR
C31
1.2I
RN
50.1
ES
P19
4.1F
RA
312.
2IR
N13
.2B
GR
13.1
BG
R16
5.3I
ND
144.
1ES
P15
9.1B
GR
158.
1GR
C31
5.1C
HN
84.4
ES
P16
2.1E
SP
84.1
ES
P31
1.1I
RN
107.
1FR
A74
.2Y
UG
603.
1ES
P30
7.1I
RN
307.
3IR
N73
5.1D
ZA
69.1
ES
P13
4.1A
US
553.
2CA
I10
5.2F
RA
197.
1IN
D20
0.1F
RA
110.
4FR
A41
.4F
RA
76.3
YU
G76
.1Y
UG
97.1
PO
L14
9.1G
BR
101.
1IT A
110.
1FR
A15
0.1G
BR
336.
1HU
N19
6.4I
ND
82.1
IND
190.
2FR
A19
1.1F
RA
231.
3HU
N19
0.1F
RA
732.
1IN
D42
.1F
RA
150.
4GB
R40
.1F
RA
756.
2ITA
197.
4IN
D73
6.3S
UN
736.
2SU
N40
.3F
RA
716.
1IN
D72
5.4C
HN
231.
2HU
N48
0.1P
OL
166.
4IN
D18
9.2F
RA
724.
1IN
D75
7.4I
T A92
.2IN
D92
.1IN
D19
5.1I
ND
799.
2SU
N21
0.1I
ND
468.
1AF
G18
9.1F
RA
207.
4IR
N52
.1E
SP
804.
1SU
N95
.1C
HN
188.
4FR
A79
9.4S
UN
357.
3YU
G96
.3R
OU
75.1
YU
G52
.3E
SP
608.
2YU
G39
.1IT
A13
4.3A
US
460.
1AF
G75
.4Y
UG
100.
1PO
L67
0.4P
OL
355.
1YU
G17
1.1C
HN
104.
1IT A
51.1
ES
P18
1.1P
OL
181.
2PO
L47
2.1A
FG
96.1
RO
U38
.1P
OL
35.1
PO
L37
.3P
OL
36.4
PO
L36
.2P
OL
37.1
PO
L33
1.4B
RA
329.
3EG
Y33
1.2B
RA
330.
1EG
Y63
4.1H
UN
636.
2TU
N33
0.4E
GY
329.
2EG
Y63
7.1T
UR
800.
1SU
N80
1.3S
UN
750.
3SU
N75
0.1S
UN
27.1
AU
S75
1.2S
UN
800.
3SU
N80
1.2S
UN
751.
1SU
N74
4.1I
ND
636.
3TU
N76
6.1D
ZA
744.
4IN
D15
.2Y
UG
15.4
YU
G33
7.2H
UN
309.
2IR
N33
7.1H
UN
309.
1IR
N98
.1P
OL
796.
2SU
N45
0.3R
OU
447.
4CH
N67
2.1P
OL
779.
1SU
N45
1.1R
OU
333.
174
0.2S
UN
765.
1SU
N34
3.2E
SP
348.
1BG
R26
.1A
US
334.
178
1.1S
UN
156.
4YU
G33
8.1H
UN
345.
1BG
R48
1.1P
OL
911.
1HU
N34
5.3B
GR
622.
2BG
R34
6.1B
GR
113.
1ES
P51
9.1I
ND
622.
1BG
R33
2.1
12.1
IND
143.
4ES
P91
2.3H
UN
912.
4HU
N37
2.2Y
UG
519.
3IN
D36
7.3B
GR
365.
1YU
G53
4.1M
AR
71.1
BG
R63
5.1H
UN
249.
1IN
D31
0.1I
RN
359.
1YU
G35
5.2Y
UG
450.
4RO
U66
2.1R
OU
737.
1IT A
364.
1YU
G31
5.2C
HN
484.
1IT A
310.
2IR
N46
.3C
RE
642.
3IN
D75
7.1I
T A35
6.1Y
UG
157.
1YU
G45
7.1A
FG
620.
4YU
G62
0.1Y
UG
470.
1AF
G79
.2IN
D75
3.2S
UN
590.
2PR
T72
.1Y
UG
666.
4AF
G78
.1Y
UG
374.
2IR
N18
6.1I
T A53
0.1A
FG
90.1
AU
S63
.4E
SP
665.
2AF
G71
2.4I
ND
590.
1PR
T18
2.1P
OL
753.
1SU
N72
.9Y
UG
22.1
AU
S16
7.1I
ND
822.
2CH
N63
8.1C
RE
663.
1RO
U91
.2IN
D67
.1E
SP
821.
1CH
N66
4.1A
FG
125.
1IN
D16
9.1C
HN
132.
1AU
S21
.1IN
D85
.1E
SP
18.1
IND
63.2
ES
P12
3.1A
US
20.1
IND
73.1
BG
R12
2.1A
US
81.1
IND
722.
1CH
N89
.1A
US
19.1
IND
28.1
AU
S72
3.1A
FG
184.
1PO
L20
6.1I
ND
21.2
IND
206.
3IN
D20
3.1I
ND
204.
3IN
D20
5.1I
ND
204.
4IN
D25
2.1D
ZA
251.
1AU
S28
0.1E
SP
218.
1TU
N25
8.3M
AR
459.
1AF
G32
6.1A
US
25.1
AU
S25
9.1M
AR
260.
1CA
I21
7.1M
AR
257.
2TU
N8.
1PR
T43
1.1I
ND
245.
1AU
S25
7.3T
UN
5.1A
US
477.
1PR
T20
2.1E
SP
444.
3CH
N26
2.1C
AI
201.
1ES
P44
4.4C
HN
222.
1CR
E44
2.1C
HN
247.
1IN
D26
1.1C
AI
496.
1MA
R14
5.1E
SP
495.
1MA
R32
8.4E
GY
286.
1GR
C32
8.1E
GY
453.
1AF
G38
8.1E
SP
9.4P
RT
216.
1MA
R11
8.1P
RT
119.
1IN
D9.
3PR
T11
9.2I
ND
454.
1AF
G17
2.2I
ND
498.
1TU
R55
.1E
SP
432.
1IN
D38
7.1E
SP
7.1A
US
80.1
IND
305.
1EG
Y22
1.1E
SP
742.
1DZ
A10
.2IN
D25
6.2T
UN
147.
1IR
QC
om1E
SP
224.
4CH
N13
6.1A
US
263.
1CA
I22
3.1M
MR
143.
1ES
P54
6.1E
SP
510.
1PR
T38
9.1P
RT
741.
1AF
G29
.1A
US
497.
1MA
R30
4.1
778.
1IT A
141.
2CH
N25
3.1M
AR
387.
2ES
P29
3.1T
UR
455.
2AF
G42
2.1I
ND
534.
2MA
R29
5.1T
UR
33.1
IND
Com
4TU
R68
2.1C
RE
224.
3CH
N23
.1A
US
686.
1MA
R25
6.1T
UN
66.2
ES
P28
8.1C
RE
169.
4CH
N25
0.1C
HN
687.
1TU
N45
8.4A
FG
425.
1IN
D69
.2E
SP
174.
1IN
D49
1.2F
RA
491.
1FR
A14
6.1E
SP
228.
1ES
P21
9.1E
SP
174.
4IN
D22
0.1E
SP
6.3A
US
10.1
IND
170.
1CH
N2.
1CR
E49
4.1E
SP
6.4A
US
514.
2IR
N17
3.1A
US
401.
1PR
T61
8.2Y
UG
133.
1AU
S62
3.3B
GR
53.1
ES
P1.
2MA
R70
.1E
SP
176.
1AF
G44
3.1C
HN
54.1
ES
P53
5.3T
UN
667.
1AF
G23
3.1I
ND
120.
1AU
S12
1.1A
US
24.1
AU
S55
3.4C
AI
283.
1GR
C66
.1E
SP
782.
3SU
N63
0.1I
RN
374.
3IR
N76
2.2D
ZA
520.
1IN
D18
3.1P
OL
609.
1YU
G45
2.2A
FG
467.
1AF
G46
.1C
RE
178.
3YU
G35
1.1Y
UG
138.
2AU
S75
4.1S
UN
213.
1MA
R10
5.1F
RA
368.
1YU
G27
7.1E
SP
178.
4YU
G12
3.2A
US
128.
2IN
D15
4.1P
RT
780.
4SU
N26
4.1C
AI
156.
1YU
G44
7.3C
HN
102.
1IT A
17.4
ES
P25
8.1M
AR
130.
1ES
P17
.2E
SP
43.1
TU
N13
1.1E
SP
544.
1ES
P27
2.1E
SP
550.
2ES
P13
9.1F
RA
57.4
PR
T16
.1E
SP
691.
1GR
C11
1.1M
AR
187.
1ITA
598.
1PR
T53
3.2M
AR
140.
1TU
R69
3.1I
RQ
417.
1IN
D27
6.1E
SP
266.
1ES
P10
3.1I
T A53
3.1M
AR
115.
3YU
G26
5.1C
AI
391.
1PR
T59
9.1P
RT
275.
1ES
P55
5.1E
SP
542.
1ES
P21
5.1M
AR
44.3
MA
R60
7.1Y
UG
45.1
SY
R22
9.1P
RT
60.2
PR
T44
.1M
AR
270.
1ES
P48
3.1P
OL
412.
3IN
D34
0.1E
SP
685.
1ES
P11
5.1Y
UG
411.
1IN
D27
4.1E
SP
462.
2AF
G19
2.1F
RA
412.
1IN
D33
9.1P
RT
690.
1GR
C17
9.1G
RC
369.
2YU
G90
4.1E
SP
214.
1MA
R54
8.1E
SP
180.
1ES
P61
2.1Y
UG
225.
1CA
I39
5.1P
RT
617.
1YU
G39
0.1P
RT
551.
1ES
P64
0.1I
RN
571.
1TU
R62
4.3B
GR
414.
1IN
D60
1.1E
SP
549.
1ES
P54
1.3E
SP
373.
1IR
N16
3.1E
SP
624.
4BG
R59
7.1P
RT
464.
1AF
G59
2.1P
RT
230.
1PR
T24
4.2I
ND
370.
1YU
G21
1.3F
RA
635.
4HU
N38
4.1G
RC
239.
1ES
P67
7.2E
SP
621.
1BG
R64
1.1I
ND
62.1
ES
P58
.1P
RT
349.
1BG
R55
8.1C
AI
301.
1TU
R19
8.3I
ND
255.
1TU
N25
4.1M
AR
396.
1PR
T11
6.1E
SP
676.
3TU
N28
9.1C
RE
383.
1GR
C60
0.1E
SP
211.
4FR
A52
9.1A
FG
688.
1ES
P13
1.2E
SP
515.
1IR
N26
8.1E
SP
679.
2IR
N58
1.1I
RN
397.
1PR
T10
6.1F
RA
683.
1ES
P18
5.1I
T A28
4.1G
RC
117.
1ES
P53
8.1T
UN
681.
1IR
N54
1.4E
SP
676.
4TU
N49
2.1E
SP
531.
1ES
P64
4.4I
ND
463.
1AF
G39
6.4P
RT
112.
2TU
R24
0.3I
RN
226.
1ES
P60
2.4E
SP
248.
2IN
D23
2.1I
ND
527.
2IN
D54
3.2E
SP
616.
1YU
G34
7.1B
GR
616.
2YU
G74
3.1S
UN
398.
1PLE
712.
2IN
D38
5.2E
SP
494.
3ES
P29
4.1T
UR
545.
1ES
P26
9.1E
SP
445.
1CH
N15
1.1P
RT
639.
1CR
E17
9.4G
RC
94.1
IND
527.
3IN
D36
1.1Y
UG
372.
1YU
G16
7.2I
ND
602.
2ES
P28
5.1G
RC
567.
1GR
C65
.1E
SP
138.
1AU
S54
0.1E
SP
455.
3AF
G99
.1P
OL
380.
1IR
N54
5.4E
SP
287.
1CR
E68
.1E
SP
762.
4DZ
A29
2.1C
YP
58.2
PR
T52
5.1I
ND
756.
1IT A
539.
1ES
P48
8.3S
UN
578.
1IR
N35
8.1Y
UG
614.
3YU
G36
6.1Y
UG
341.
1ES
P11
.2IN
D35
4.1Y
UG
670.
1PO
L61
9.1Y
UG
537.
1TU
N28
7.2C
RE
614.
1YU
G50
7.1A
US
717.
1CH
N55
2.2C
AI
437.
3CH
N56
2.1G
RC
482.
1PO
L11
.1IN
D65
2.1C
HN
160.
2ES
P77
0.1S
UN
490.
1FR
A29
1.1C
YP
338.
3HU
N47
1.1A
FG
654.
4CH
N93
.1IN
D43
6.1C
HN
175.
2CH
N56
0.1G
RC
212.
1MA
R43
6.2C
HN
148.
1AU
S10
8.1F
RA
669.
4CH
N58
6.2C
HN
47.1
ES
P17
5.3C
HN
317.
1CH
N83
.1E
SP
437.
1CH
N65
4.3C
HN
129.
2IN
D60
8.1Y
UG
438.
4CH
N14
2.1M
AR
759.
4SU
N65
1.1C
HN
652.
2CH
N10
9.1F
RA
64.1
ES
P56
3.1C
RE
60.1
PR
T61
.1E
SP
227.
3ES
P43
8.3C
HN
759.
2SU
N12
9.1I
ND
758.
2
AF
GA
US
BG
RB
RA
CA
IC
HN
CR
EC
YP
DZ
AE
GY
ES
PE
TH
FIN
FR
AG
BR
GR
CH
UN
IND
IRN
IRQ
ITA
MA
RM
MR
PLE
PO
LP
RT
RO
US
UN
SY
RT
UN
TU
RY
UGC
1839Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
(nearly 4,000 cultivars) revealed an average allele number of 23.9 per locus scored and a dPIC of 0.74 (Balfourier et al. 2007). The genetic diversity values found for the three lCs collections are of similar levels, although they were not found with the same marker set. They can therefore be seen as a rough guide when comparing the diversity levels of the populations. A further insight can be gained by looking at shared markers only. eight markers were shared between the study presented here and the IPK study (Huang et al. 2002). In general, the same level of allele number and gene diversity are found for those eight markers (see Table S8) in both studies. The analysis presented also possessed eight markers in common with the InrA study Balfourier et al. (2007). In this case more discrepancies between the diver-sity levels detected are found (see Table S8). However, a less strict correlation was expected, as MCs were included in the InrA collection. Also, the number of InrA acces-sions analysed was five times higher than in the Watkins collection. InrA lCs came from a greater spread of coun-tries. The differences between the studies could reflect the genetic diversity present in those additional geographic regions, which are not present in the Watkins collection.
The diversity levels found in the Watkins collection were also compared to those of the Gediflux collection, which stands for the type of northern european germplasm breed-ing would be targeted for. It seems apparent from this com-parison that the lCs assembled in the Watkins collection preserve a much higher level of genetic diversity than pre-sent in the MCs. The gene diversity (dnei) values are 0.78 versus 0.65 for the Watkins and the Gediflux collections, respectively. A more detailed comparison of the diversity levels for single markers was possible, due to 14 mark-ers being shared between the studies. The Watkins diver-sity values were consistently higher for all 14 markers (see Table S9).
In the present study we found the diversity of the B genome to be higher than those of the A and D genomes. The differences in diversity between the three ancient wheat genomes deviates from that found in wheat SnP discovery approaches, which find the D genome being less diverse than the A and B genomes (Allen et al. 2011; Cavanagh et al. 2013). In particular, no difference in diver-sity between A and D genome was detected, whereas the A genome should show a higher diversity than the D genome. This lack of discrimination is potentially due to a bias in marker choice, where diverse markers were given a prefer-ence. Furthermore, the presented analysis was based on a small number of markers only, and may thus not robustly represent the diversity of the different genomes.
Population structure
The grouping of the Watkins collection into two major ancestral populations and the subsequent hierarchical sub-division into four and five ancestral subpopulations for the two groups, respectively, was detected by Bayesian model-based clustering (see Fig. 2). Accessions of the ancestral subpopulations could be predominantly assigned to the fol-lowing geographic regions: russia (group 1.1); China/India (group 1.2); Central/east Asia (group 1.3); mixed europe/Asia (group 1.4); South europe/Asia (group 2.1); north-west europe (group 2.2); east europe (group 2.3); South Mediterranean/Africa (group 2.4); and north Mediterra-nean (group 2.5) (see Fig. 2).
The geographic regions found here are in principle in good agreement with other studies of bread wheat lC collections. Five ancestral groups were found within a 372 accession strong core set of the InrA bread wheat collection using markers for chromosome 3B (Horvath et al. 2009). A division into northwest europe, Southeast
Fig. 3 representation of the STrUCTUre assignment of the Ged-iflux MCs into two ancestral populations. The panel is divided into four rows which show (from top to bottom): Row 1 assignment to ancestral population as detected by STrUCTUre (population 1: dark green, population 2: light green). Row 2 ancestral characteris-tics of each line as detected by STrUCTUre (colours as in row 1).
Row 3 colour code of decade of release for varieties from the eU rec-ommended list. Row 4 colour code of origin: eU recommended list (green) or UK national list (yellow). The accession numbers of the Gediflux varieties are given below row 4. legends with colour code for the different rows are given below the plot (colour figure online)
1840 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
europe, Asia, nepal and CIMMYT-ICArDA is reported. The Watkins collection does not contain samples from nepal and CIMMYT-ICArDA, so those ancestral groups cannot be discovered in the present analysis. However, a split between northwest europe, Southwest europe and Asia was detected in the Watkins population. An analy-sis of just 235 of the above 372 accessions with 82 SSrs, covering the whole genome (rousset et al. 2011) again reports five, but slightly different groups. The groups are: northwest europe, Southeast europe, Mediterranean, Cen-tral Asia and South America/Africa. Here the group from nepal is not identified but a separate Mediterranean group was found. Several of the groups found are also present in the Watkins collection. A northwest european (group 2.2), east european (group 2.3), and a Mediterranean-dominated group (groups 2.4 and 2.5) are found for both studies. How-ever, a further small but distinct european–Asian Group (group 2.1) was found in the Watkins collection alone. Moreover, several Asian groups (groups 1.2–1.4) and the russian group (group 1.1) were only found in the Watkins collection. The InrA collection contains a small number of Asian accessions (Balfourier et al. 2007; rousset et al. 2011) in comparison to the Watkins collection (over 300 lCs). The detected Asian cluster is thus the smallest clus-ter in the InrA analysis. not surprisingly no subdivision of that cluster was detected, most likely due to scarcity of genetic information. The Watkins collection, however, con-tains a large number of Asian lCs, and several ancestral groups from Asia are revealed. This shows that the Watkins collection has good additional value to the other lC col-lections. regarding the large number of russian lCs in the Watkins population, it can be speculated that this may have been brought about by Vavilov’s breeding efforts in the 1920s (Vavilov 1931). Watkins was inspired by Vavilov and presumably thus particularly acquired accessions from that region. It would be interesting to analyse the popula-tion structure of the IPK landrace collection (Huang et al. 2002), as it contains more russian accessions than the Wat-kins collection, and possibly further groupings might be discovered.
The identification of the ancestral populations of the Watkins collection was made difficult by a noisy popula-tion structure. In the initial non-hierarchical approach, the nine ancestral populations were not detected. The presence of a weak signal of population structure suggests that the difference between groups was not strong. An exchange of breeding material between farmers on a larger scale may be one reason for the absence of a strong population structure. This may have overridden some of the signals of ancestral groupings. It would be interesting to line group-ings up with predominant old trade routes, if that informa-tion was available. In addition, the accessions in the Wat-kins collection are not random samples, but were selected
possibly based on geographic distribution and availability. This selection will have had an influence on the observed population structure, which was calculated assuming a ran-dom selection of lCs. Strong signals of population struc-ture have been reported between wheat lCs, if the selection of cultivars came from geographically distinct places, e.g. in a comparison of lCs from Mexico and Turkey (Dreisi-gacker et al. 2005) and lCs from Turkey and Kazakhstan (Sayar-Turet et al. 2011). Due to the pre-selection of these lCs, the observed population structure is artificially high. It seems to be much stronger than the one we find in the broader, geographically more evenly spaced selection pre-sent in the Watkins collection. However, the weak popula-tion structure signal seems more realistic, as it is based on many more lCs. Overall, the detection of ancestral group-ings means that different sets of gene combinations are pre-sent. This is more reason to expect new and useful alleles to be present in the collection. These alleles would have been conserved under some growing conditions, but would have been lost in the streams leading to the development of mod-ern germplasm.
The Watkins collection is proven to host interesting alleles, particularly for disease resistance (Dyck 1994; Bansal et al. 2011; Thompson and Seymour 2011), which are mainly Mendelian genes and comparatively easy to identify. In order to facilitate the use of the collection, par-ticularly for more complicated phenotypic screens, a core set of 119 lines was defined. This core set captures the majority of the genetic diversity and has been put to use by physiologists and breeders within the Wheat Improvement Strategic Programme (WISP, http://www.wheatisp.org).
Furthermore, a larger number of bi-parental mapping populations is under development, which will allow QTl mapping to be carried out. Transgressive segregants were discovered in several of these populations when scored for common traits. Furthermore, a number of QTls have been identified. These observations and findings support the claim that the bi-parental populations will be valuable resources in the identification of new alleles in the wheat genome.
World wheat yields have plateaued in the last 10 years. All possible efforts are necessary to achieve a sufficient increase in world wheat yields, to keep up with the world’s growing human population and the challenges climate change will pose for agriculture. The detailed genotypic description of the Watkins lCs collection and the development of the new breeding resources should ultimately improve and acceler-ate allele discovery for simple, as well as for complex, traits and hopefully help to achieve the successful improvement of bread wheat, in line with the growing demand.
Acknowledgments We thank JIC GrU for seeds of the Watkins bread wheat lCs. Part of this research was supported by funding
1841Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
from he UK Department of the environment Food and rural Affairs (DeFrA) through a grant for the Wheat Genetic Improvement net-work (WGIn) and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences research Council (BBSrC) through a grant for the Wheat Pre-Breed-ing lola and the Wheat Improvement Strategic Programme (WISP). We thank four anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful comments on the paper.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Part of this research was supported by funding from the UK Department of the environment Food and rural Affairs (DeFrA) through a grant for the Wheat Genetic Improvement network (WGIn), grant number IF0146 and the UK Biotechnology and Bio-logical Sciences research Council (BBSrC) through a grant for the Wheat Pre-Breeding lola, grant number: BB/I002545/1.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Crea-tive Commons Attribution license which permits any use, distribu-tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
References
Allen AM, Barker Gl, Berry ST, Coghill JA, Gwilliam r, Kirby S, robinson P, Brenchley rC, D’Amore r, McKenzie n, Waite D, Hall A, Bevan M, Hall n, edwards KJ (2011) Transcript-specific, single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and linkage analysis in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). Plant Biotechnol J 9(9):1086–1099
Balfourier F, roussel V, Strelchenko P, exbrayat-Vinson F, Sour-dille P, Boutet G, Koenig J, ravel C, Mitrofanova O, Beckert M, Charmet G (2007) A worldwide bread wheat core collection arrayed in a 384-well plate. Theor Appl Genet 114:1265–1275
Bansal UK, Forrest Kl, Hayden MJ, Miah H, Singh D, Bariana HS (2011) Characterisation of a new stripe rust resistance gene Yr47 and its genetic association with the leaf rust resistance gene lr52. Theor Appl Genet 122(8):1461–1466
Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, Snape JW, laurie DA (2007) A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). Theor Appl Genet 115(5):721–733
Cavanagh Cr, Chao S, Wang S, Huang Be, Stephen S, Kiani S, For-rest K, Saintenac C, Brown-Guedira Gl, Akhunova A, See D, Bai G, Pumphrey M, Tomar l, Wong D, Kong S, reynolds M, da Silva Ml, Bockelman H, Talbert l, Anderson JA, Dreisi-gacker S, Baenziger S, Carter A, Korzun V, Morrell Pl, Dubcov-sky J, Morell MK, Sorrells Me, Hayden MJ, Akhunov e (2013) Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cul-tivars. Proc natl Acad Sci 110(20):8057–8062
Díaz A, Zikhali M, Turner AS, Isaac P, laurie DA (2012) Copy num-ber variation affecting the Photoperiod-B1 and Vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). PloS One 7(3):e33234
Distelfeld A, li C, Dubcovsky J (2009) regulation of flowering in temperate cereals. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12(2):178–184. (Genome Studies and Molecular Genetics edited by Masahiro Yano and roberto Tuberosa)
Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127(7):1309–1321
Dreisigacker S, Skovmand B, Zhang P, Hoisington D, Warburton Ml, Melchinger Ae (2005) Genetic diversity among and within CIMMYT wheat landrace accessions investigated with SSrs and
implications for plant genetic resources management. Crop Sci 45(2):653–661
Dyck Pl (1994) Genetics of leaf rust resistance in 13 accessions of the Watkins wheat collection. euphytica 80(1–2):151–155
evanno G, regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol ecol 14:2611–2620
Feldmann M (2001) Origin of cultivated wheat. In: Bonjean A, Angus W (eds) The world wheat book: a history of wheat breeding. lavoisier Publishing, Paris, pp 3–56
Fu D, Szcs P, Yan l, Helguera M, Skinner JS, von Zitzewitz J, Hayes PM, Dubcovsky J (2005) large deletions within the first intron in Vrn-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat. Mol Genet Genom 273(1):54–65
Gegas VC, nazari A, Griffiths S, Simmonds J, Fish l, Orford S, Sayers l, Doonan JH, Snape JW (2010) A genetic framework for grain size and shape variation in wheat. Plant Cell Online 22(4):1046–1056
Horvath A, Didier A, Koenig J, exbrayat F, Charmet G, Balfourier F (2009) Analysis of diversity and linkage disequilibrium along chromosome 3B of bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum l.). Theor Appl Genet 119:1523–1537
Huang XQ, Börner A, röder MS, Ganal MW (2002) Assessing genetic diversity of wheat ( Triticum aestivum l.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 105(5):699–707
Khush GS (2001) Timeline: Green revolution: the way forward. nat rev Genet 2(10):815–822
Miller Te, Ambrose MJ, reader SM (2001) linnean special issue, the Watkins collection of landrace derived wheats. In: S CPD, e BP (eds) Wheat taxonomy: the legacy of John Precival. The linnean Society of london, special issue no. 3. An edited volume arising from papers presented at The Percival symposium: wheat-yester-day, today and tomorrow, The University of reading, UK, 12–13 July 1999, volume 3, pp 113–120. Academic Press, london, UK
Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of popula-tion structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959
r Core Team (2013) r: a language and environment for statistical computing. r Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
reeves J, Chiapparino e, Donini P, Ganal M, Guiard J, Hamrit S, Heckenberger M, Huan X, Van Kaauwen M, Kochieva e, Koeb-ner r, law J, lea V, leClerc V, Van der lee T, leigh F, Van der linden G, Malysheva l, Melchinger A, Orford S, reif J, röder M, Schulman A, Vosman B, Van der Wiel C, Wolf M, Zhang D (2004) Changes over time in the genetic diversity of four major european crops: a report from the GeDIFlUX Framework 5 Pro-ject. In: Vollmann J, Grausgruber H, ruckenbauer P (eds) Genetic variation for plant breeding. Proceedings of the 17th eUCArPIA general congress, Tulln, Austria, 8–11 September 2004, pp 3–7
reif JC, Zhang P, Dreisigacker S, Warburton Ml, van Ginkel M, Hoisington D, Bohn M, Melchinger Ae (2005) Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding. Theor Appl Genet110(5):859–864
roussel V, leisova l, exbayat F, Balfourier F (2005) SSr allelic diversity changes in 480 european bread wheat varieties released from 1840 to 2000. Theor Appl Genet 111:162–170
rousset M, Bonnin I, remou C, Falque M, rhon B, Veyrieras J-B, Madur D, Murigneux A, Balfourier F, Gouis J, Santoni S, Gol-dringer I (2011) Deciphering the genetics of flowering time by an association study on candidate genes in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum l.). Theor Appl Genet 123(6):907–926
Salamini F, Ozkan H, Brandolini A, Schäfer-Pregl r, Martin W (2002) Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. nat rev Genet 3(6):429–441
1842 Theor Appl Genet (2014) 127:1831–1842
1 3
Sayar-Turet M, Dreisigacker S, Braun H-J, Hede A, MacCormack r, Boyd lA (2011) Genetic variation within and between win-ter wheat genotypes from Turkey, Kazakhstan, and europe as determined by nucleotide-binding-site profiling. Genome 54(5):419–430
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCr fragments. nat Biotechnol 18(2):233–234
Shewry P (2009) Wheat. J exp Bot 60:1537–1553Smale M, reynolds MP, Warburton M, Skovmand B, Trethowan r,
Singh rP, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Crossa J (2002) Dimensions of diversity in modern spring bread wheat in developing countries from 1965. Crop Sci 42(6):1766
Somers DJ, Isaac P, edwards K (2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). Theor Appl Genet 109(6):1105–1114
Tanksley SD (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277(5329):1063–1066
Thachuk C, Crossa J, Franco J, Dreisigacker S, Warburton M, Daven-port GF (2009) Core hunter: an algorithm for sampling genetic resources based on multiple genetic measures. BMC Bioinform 10(243)
Thompson JP, Seymour nP (2011) Inheritance of resistance to root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) in wheat landraces and cultivars from the West Asia and north Africa (WAnA) region. Crop Pasture Sci 62(1):82
Vavilov nI (1931) The problem of the origin of the world’s agricul-ture in the light of the latest investigations. In: Science at the Cross roads. Papers from The second international congress of the history of science and technology, KnIGA (england) ltd, london, pp 95–106
Watkins Ae (1933) The origin of cultivated plants. Antiquity 7(25):73–80
White J, law J, MacKay I, Chalmers K, Smith J, Kilian A, Powell W (2008) The genetic diversity of UK, US and Australian cultivars of Triticum aestivum measured by DArT markers and considered by genome. Theor Appl Genet 116:439–453
Wilhelm eP, Turner AS, laurie DA (2008) Photoperiod insensitive Ppd-A1a mutations in tetraploid wheat ( Triticum durum desf.). Theor Appl Genet 118(2):285–294
Yan l, Helguera M, Kato K, Fukuyama S, Sherman J, Dubcovsky J (2004) Allelic variation at the Vrn-1 promoter region in poly-ploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 109(8):1677–1686
