ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.

21
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1

Transcript of ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.

ESEA Flexibility: Achievement

ESEA Flexibility: School ProgressMaryland Accountability ProgramPresentation 2 of 81

Lillian M. Lowery, Ed.D.State Superintendent of Schools

Dr. Charlene M. DukesPresident, Maryland State Board of Education

Martin O'MalleyGovernor

Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D.Assistant SuperintendentDivision of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems

Maryland State Department of EducationDivision of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems200 West Baltimore StreetBaltimore, Maryland 21201410.767.0073MarylandPublicSchools.org22Maryland Accountability ProgramSchool ProgressReduce by half the percentage of students in the all students group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years School Progress IndexAchievementGrowthGap ReductionCollege & Career ReadinessDifferentiated RecognitionRewardPriority Focus33AMO ProgressAnnual Measurable Objective (AMO) ProgressReduce the percentage of students in the all students group and in each subgroup (with the exception of Attendance Rate) who are not proficient

Three indicatorsProficiency ProgressReading and Mathematics ProficiencyAll Student group and at each subgroup

Graduation Rate ProgressAdjusted Cohort RatesHigh SchoolAll Student group and at each subgroup

Attendance Rate ProgressElementary and Middle schoolsAll Student group only44Proficiency Progress Reading and Mathematics ProficiencyEstablishing AMOs - Calculations50% Reduction of basic proficiency by 2017 using goal of 100% proficiencyTarget increases in equal increments for 6 yearsFor all students group and each subgroup20102011 assessment results used as the baseline year for setting AMOs

For any subgroup or all students group at the school level with a 90% or higher baseline, the corresponding LEA level AMO will be substitutedUnless the LEA is higher than the school/subgroup level

Minimum count of 5 students

55Proficiency Progress Reading and Mathematics PopulationEstablishing AMOs - PopulationsFormer AYP population rules applyTest Takers must meet Full Academic YearExited rules for inclusion in special area subgroup Special Education ExitedLimited English Proficient ExitedLEP Exempt1% and 2% Rule for Alt and Mod assessment contributions

With the exceptionNon-participants ARE included WITHIN the aggregated population as Basic

66Proficiency Progress Reading and Mathematics AMO Target CalculationsGoal for 2017=100%2011 % Proficient2Gain Per Year=Goal for 201762012 Target=2011 % Proficient+Gain Per Year7Examples of Achievement Targets2011201220132014201520162017Gain/Year0.00%8.33%16.67%25.00%33.33%41.67%50.00%8.33%10.00%17.50%25.00%32.50%40.00%47.50%55.00%7.50%20.00%26.67%33.33%40.00%46.67%53.33%60.00%6.67%30.00%35.83%41.67%47.50%53.33%59.17%65.00%5.83%40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%60.00%65.00%70.00%5.00%50.00%54.17%58.33%62.50%66.67%70.83%75.00%4.17%60.00%63.33%66.67%70.00%73.33%76.67%80.00%3.33%70.00%72.50%75.00%77.50%80.00%82.50%85.00%2.50%80.00%81.67%83.33%85.00%86.67%88.33%90.00%1.67%90.00%90.83%91.67%92.50%93.33%94.17%95.00%0.83%95.00%95.42%95.83%96.25%96.67%97.08%97.50%0.42%8What if there is no data available in 2011 to establish a baseline?9Examples include:A newly opened school in 2013A new subgroup introduced in 2012

The baseline will be established the year that the data is first available and targets will be set based upon the number of remaining years Proficiency Progress Reading and Mathematics Proficiency MatrixIn order to be considered.Are there 5 or more students within the group? If yes

In order to determine the groups progress (met or not met)Was the AMO met?

If no

Was the AMO met with the Confidence Interval?

* There is no longer a Safe Harbor condition!10

DRAFTDRAFT11Graduation Rate ProgressEstablishing AMOs - Calculations50% reduction of basic proficiency by 2020 using goal of 95% proficiencyTarget increases in equal increments for 9 yearsFor all students and each subgroup2011 Reported Graduation Rates used as the baseline for setting AMOsFour Year and Five Year AMOs establishedFirst Time 9th Graders 2007

For any subgroup or all students group at the school level with a 90% or higher baseline, the corresponding LEA level AMO will be substitutedUnless the LEA is higher than the school/subgroup level

Minimum count of 30 students

1212Graduation Rate AMO Target CalculationsSame calculation used to set 4 year and 5 year AMOsGoal for 2020=95%2011 Grad Rate2Gain Per Year=Goal for 202092012 Target=2011 Grad Rate+Gain Per Year13

DRAFTDRAFT14Graduation Rate Progress MatrixIn order to be considered.Are there 30 or more students within the group? If yes

In order to determine the groups progress (met or not met)Was the 4-year AMO met?

If no

Was the 5-year AMO met?

* There are no confidence intervals with Grad Rate nor is there a Safe Harbor condition!15Attendance Rate ProgressAMOsGoal consistent with NCLB by school configuration

1616

DRAFTDRAFTSample AMO Spreadsheet18schoolsubtitlesubgroupYr2011 baselineLEA AMO FlagYr2012amoYr2013amoYr2014 amoYr2015amoYr2016amoYr2017amoEle-1MathAll Students88.4892Y89.490.491.492.393.394.2Ele-1MathWhite88.8181Y89.790.791.692.593.594.4Ele-1MathSpecial Education71.2166Y73.676.078.480.883.285.6Ele-1MathFARMS87.7193N88.789.890.891.892.893.9AMathAll Students82.5477N84.085.586.988.489.891.3AMathHispanic/Latino of any race89.7959N90.691.592.393.294.094.9AMathAmerican Indian or Alaskan Native94.1176N94.695.195.696.196.697.1AMathAsian93.75N94.394.895.395.896.496.9AMathBlack or African American74.359N76.578.680.882.985.087.2AMathWhite82.7495N84.285.687.188.589.991.4AMathTwo or more races81.25N82.884.485.987.589.190.6AMathSpecial Education61.3833N64.667.871.074.377.580.7AMathLimited English Proficiency57.1429N60.764.367.971.475.078.6AMathFARMS76.0523N78.080.082.084.086.088.018AMO Spreadsheets19Keep in mind the following:Only those populations present within the school are represented on the spreadsheet (>4 for Reading and Math and >29 for Graduation Rate)If the LEA AMO flag is set to Y, the baseline was defaulted to the LEAs AMO for the subgroup and grade levels corresponding to the subgroup population within the schoolIf the LEA AMO flag is set to Y this does not mean that the substituted AMO will match the LEA AMOs at the bottom of the spreadsheet. The LEA AMOs at the bottom of the spreadsheet are reflective of ALL grade levels.Maryland Accountability ProgramSchool ProgressReduce by half the percentage of students in the all students group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years School Progress IndexAchievementGrowthGap ReductionCollege & Career ReadinessDifferentiated RecognitionRewardPriority Focus20So to summarize, the new Maryland Accountability Program incorporated these three components

20Questions?Please forward questions and comments to:

Doug Strader, [email protected]