ERTMS in Norway - ERTMS Congres · ERTMS in Norway ProRail 30th January 2020 Sverre Kjenne –EVP...
Transcript of ERTMS in Norway - ERTMS Congres · ERTMS in Norway ProRail 30th January 2020 Sverre Kjenne –EVP...
ERTMS in Norway
ProRail
30th January 2020Sverre Kjenne – EVP Digitalisation and technology
Purpose of the presentation
2
• Introduce the Norwegian challenge
• Describe the strategical decisions
• Share some reflections
ERTMS in Norway
• 336 interlockings (sites) in Norway
• 80% of Norwegian systems are relay based
• Production and support of parts halted
• Challenge to interface new equipment
• Lack of qualified resources – not “hot” tech
• Signal and telecom make up 40% of delays
3
Urgent need for renewal as the main driver for ERTMS
ERTMS in Norway
Significant organizational implications
4
Field traffic controllers % Workload signalling engineers
373
275
175
35
0
100
200
300
400
2020 2022 2026 2030
100
90
6040
0
20
40
60
80
100
2020 2022 2026 2030
336325
175
10
100
200
300
400
2020 2022 2026 2030
Number of interlocking sites
10095
80
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
2020 2022 2026 2030
% Components in the track
0
0,002
0,004
0,006
0,008
2016 2017 2018
ØØL Alle andre
Delay-hours per produced train-hour
63
82 87 94 97 98
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032
Support (MNOK)
ERTMS in Norway
5
Ambitious timeline for the ERTMS renewal program
2012 2015 2018 2022 2026 2030
MoT decidesrenewal with
ERTMS
Pilot linein operation
Contractssigned
First linein operation
Oslo Centralto ERTMS
Last linein operation
31st October 20221430 at Grong
ERTMS in Norway
• Three technical areas
− Trackside
− Onboard
− TMS
• ERTMS level 2 baseline 3.6
6
Program valued € 2,5 billion consists of three parts
ERTMS in Norway
• Signalling Systems – new supplier
• Preparatory civil works – local contracts
• Telecom services – based on existing network
• Removal and disposal of infrastructure no longer in use – Local contracts
• Datacentres handled by Bane NOR
− Rented facilities 1 + 1
7
Trackside supplier limited to core competence
ERTMS in Norway
8
Hard choice to decide on number of suppliers for trackside
One supplier
• Simpler specification and development
• Less interfaces
• Simpler administration and version handling
• Better prices and attention due to higher volume
• Standardization of operations
• More power to supplier after contract has been signed
Two suppliers
• Better in case of total failure of a supplier
• No real competition due to lack of standards
• Difficult to cross over solutions between two suppliers
• Significantly higher development cost and complexity give increased probability of delay
ERTMS in Norway
• Timing is critical
• Probability of delay is high
• Probability of total failure is lower and should be planned separately
• No quick cross-over between suppliers possible
• Focus limited resources for success
• Introduce EULYNX a standard
• One monopolist is bad, two even worse?
9
We finally decided to go for one trackside supplier -Siemens
ERTMS in Norway
• Rebuild around 400 trains
• 14 RVOs (Rail Vehicle Owner)
• Approximately 40 first of class
• Norwegian government sponsors 50% of RVO’s costs if plan is followed
ERTMS in Norway10
ERTMS onboard - Alstom
• Significant IT project requires additional capabilities
• Valuable learning from our pilot line put into operation 2015
• Excellent information sharing with Denmark, Sweden …
• High cost and complexity – not exactly “off the shelf” solutions – limit requirements
• Poor data quality in Bane NOR causes complications
• Difficult to freeze design basis – operational scenarios
• Hard date for opening ensures common goal in challenging planning environment
• First “we are delayed” received shortly after contract signature –contingency
• Keep it simple whenever possible11
Reflections
ERTMS in Norway
Thank you for your attention!