Erratum to: Potential impacts of increased coastal flooding in California due to sea-level rise

1
ERRATUM Erratum to: Potential impacts of increased coastal flooding in California due to sea-level rise Matthew Heberger & Heather Cooley & Pablo Herrera & Peter H. Gleick & Eli Moore Published online: 19 January 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Erratum to: Climatic Change (2011) 109 (Suppl 1):S229S249 DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0308-1 In Tables 5 and 6, figures are in billions of dollars, not millions as stated in the caption. In Figure 5, several of the numeric labels are incorrect. The reader should refer to Table 5 for the correct values. Furthermore, some of the figures in Table 6 were incorrect. Please refer to the corrected Table 6 below. Climatic Change (2012) 112:523 DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0397-5 Table 6 Value of buildings and contents at risk from a 100-year flood after a 1.4 m sea-level rise, by economic sector (billions of year-2000 dollars) Sector Current Risk Risk + 1.4 m SLR % of Total Value at Risk in Future Residential 33 58 59% Commercial 11 27 27% Industrial 4.9 11.0 11% Religion 0.47 1.00 1.0% Government 0.32 0.86 0.9% Education 0.42 0.85 0.9% Agriculture 0.25 0.42 0.4% Total 51 99 100% The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0308-1. M. Heberger (*) : H. Cooley : P. Herrera : P. H. Gleick : E. Moore Pacific Institute, 654 13th Street, Oakland, CA 94612, USA e-mail: [email protected] H. Cooley e-mail: [email protected] P. Herrera e-mail: [email protected] P. H. Gleick e-mail: [email protected] E. Moore e-mail: [email protected]

Transcript of Erratum to: Potential impacts of increased coastal flooding in California due to sea-level rise

ERRATUM

Erratum to: Potential impacts of increased coastalflooding in California due to sea-level rise

Matthew Heberger & Heather Cooley & Pablo Herrera &

Peter H. Gleick & Eli Moore

Published online: 19 January 2012# Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Erratum to: Climatic Change (2011) 109 (Suppl 1):S229–S249DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0308-1

In Tables 5 and 6, figures are in billions of dollars, not millions as stated in the caption. InFigure 5, several of the numeric labels are incorrect. The reader should refer to Table 5 forthe correct values. Furthermore, some of the figures in Table 6 were incorrect. Please refer tothe corrected Table 6 below.

Climatic Change (2012) 112:523DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0397-5

Table 6 Value of buildings and contents at risk from a 100-year flood after a 1.4 m sea-level rise, byeconomic sector (billions of year-2000 dollars)

Sector Current Risk Risk + 1.4 mSLR

% of Total Valueat Risk in Future

Residential 33 58 59%

Commercial 11 27 27%

Industrial 4.9 11.0 11%

Religion 0.47 1.00 1.0%

Government 0.32 0.86 0.9%

Education 0.42 0.85 0.9%

Agriculture 0.25 0.42 0.4%

Total 51 99 100%

The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0308-1.

M. Heberger (*) :H. Cooley : P. Herrera : P. H. Gleick : E. MoorePacific Institute, 654 13th Street, Oakland, CA 94612, USAe-mail: [email protected]

H. Cooleye-mail: [email protected]

P. Herrerae-mail: [email protected]

P. H. Gleicke-mail: [email protected]

E. Mooree-mail: [email protected]