ERM: What's New & What's Next
-
date post
19-Oct-2014 -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
994 -
download
5
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of ERM: What's New & What's Next

www.theiia.org/Training
ERM: What’s New & What’s Next
Institute of Internal Auditors WebinarFebruary 19, 2009
Presented by:John A. Wheeler, Managing Principal, Wheelhouse Advisors LLCKenneth K. Yoo, Senior Vice President – Enterprise Risk Management, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Discussion Topics
• Key risks facing companies operating both inside and outside the United States
• Developing an Enterprise Risk Management Framework & Approach
• Evolution of a Risk & Controls Program
• Enterprise Risk Management in the era of increased regulatory and shareholder scrutiny
│1

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Changing Risk Environment
│2

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Changing Risk EnvironmentIn 2008 & 2009, the risk landscape has shifted dramatically
│3
Fannie and Freddie Likely to Plunge, Searing Investors

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Developing an ERM Framework
What is “ERM”?
“… a process, effected by an entity's board of directors,
management and other personnel, applied in strategy
setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify
potential events that may affect the entity, and manage
risks to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives.”
Source: COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework - 2004.
│4

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Developing an ERM Framework
• ERM is a process that encompasses the following key activities– Identifies potential events that may arise out of and/or impact a
company’s strategic objectives
– Assesses the severity and likelihood of risk events
– Determines risk response
• Evaluates in relation to risk tolerances
• Determines approach – Avoid, Accept, Reduce, Share
• Specifies mitigation plan
– Manages risk within the enterprise’s risk appetite
– Takes a portfolio view of risk at the top
– Monitors performance continuously
│5

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Developing an ERM Framework
“Old School” Approach “New School” Approach
Risk perceived as individual hazards that may
negatively impact a given area
Understand risks in context of business
strategies and objectives
Ad hoc focus on risks with greatest emphasis
on recent events
Disciplined and forward looking focus on
critical risks
Managing risks is senior management’s
responsibility
Managing risk is everyone’s responsibility
Minimize and/or eliminate risk Manage risk within tolerance levels and
capitalize on opportunities
No risk owners Well defined accountability for risks
No formal risk reporting or monitoring at the
entity level
Risk reporting emanating from existing
channels to the top
Highly decentralized Portfolio management
│6

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Risk Assessment vs. ERM
• Risk Assessment– Point-in-time snapshot
– Often internal audit driven
– Identifies where to focus current attention
– Great for planning, but not the full solution
• ERM– Continuous risk monitoring and identification
– Real-time assessment using indicators as well as evaluation of new strategic initiatives
– Balanced focus on opportunities and impacts
– Built-in ownership of risks at the right level – embedded in the business
│7

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Benefits of ERM
ERM provides the ability for a company to:– Understand and define risk appetite as it relates to strategy
– Link growth, risk and return
– Optimize risk response decisions
– Minimize operational losses and surprises
– Rationalize capital resources
– Strengthen credit ratings
– Improve efficiency by integrating responses to multiple risks
– Seize opportunities to capitalize on rewards from taking intelligent risks
│8

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Evolution of a Risk & Controls Program
• Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) Section 404 as a starting point
• Innovation and integration leading to greater efficiency and effectiveness
• Barriers to overcome
• Required changes in approach
│9

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
SOX as a starting point
• Similar disciplined approach with primary focus on risks first, processes second and controls third
• Streamlining business processes– Eliminating duplicative activities
– Process improvement, eliminate outdated procedures
– Enhancing data integrity for critical decision-making
• Enhancing, automating and integrating data flow– Focus on data analytics and mining opportunities to strengthen
controls
– Providing more transparent and seamless communication across the business
– Viewing the process end-to-end to understand control gaps
│10

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Evolution of Risk & Control Programs
Evolving Mature
• Highly reactive to individual regulatory mandates
• Immature risk governance & oversight structure
• Informal risk related infrastructure
• Individual control programs in various phases of implementation and/or refinement
• Evolving risk governance & oversight structure
• More formal risk related infrastructure at corporate and business unit levels
• Alignment of control programs to increase efficiency and reduce administrative burden
• More focused risk governance & oversight structure
• Identification and implementation of best practices across business units
• Seamless and proactive risk & control program
• Risk governance & oversight structure fully embedded in business governance structure (i.e. from strategy through execution)
• Risk infrastructure automated and fully integrated across enterprise
Developing Implementing Improving Integrating
│11

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Barriers to OvercomeAttitudes / Culture
• People are “burned-out” by SOX
• Seen as interfering with “real work”
• Lack of alignment with performance measurements – little incentive to
participate
• Budget constraints are increasing leaving few resources to commit
• View that one-time training is the answer
• Wavering support from executive management and board
Infrastructure
• No shared language
• Over reliance on support functions
• Little or no linkage between risks, process and controls
• Enabling technology is non-existent or fragmented at best
│12

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Barriers to Overcome
│13

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Internal Audit’s ERM Barriers to Overcome
│14
26%
26%
30%
52%
55%
53%
22%
19%
17%
Use of technology and analytics
Fraud prevention / detection
Enterprise Risk Assessment
Internal Audit ERM Competency Map
Improvement Opportunity Somewhat Competent Very Competent
Source: Ernst & Young 2008 Global Internal Audit Survey

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Internal Audit’s Role in ERM
│15
Source: The Institute of Internal Auditors

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
ERM Program Sustainability
Yes29%
No71%
Has your company reached a sustaining ERM maturity level?
│16
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other
Risk management efforts are part of the organization’s management
process and tools
Management is part of the risk management program
Senior management endorses the organization’s risk management
efforts
22%
66%
74%
84%
What makes your ERM program sustainable?
Source: 2008 ERM Benchmarking Survey - The Institute of Internal Auditors

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Changes Required
• Clear and consistent support from executive management
• High-level, multi-disciplinary, dedicated core team
• Strong business case on how ERM will enhance
– Business decision-making
– Achievement of corporate and business unit strategic objectives
– Identification of opportunities as well as potential impacts
• Building ERM into business processes – efficiently and without undue administrative burden
• Well defined roles and responsibilities for risk leading to improved accountability – build into incentives and performance management
• Long-term commitment to the effort, linked to strategic planning
│17

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Changes Required
│18

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Increased Scrutiny
• Legal / Regulatory
– SEC
– Department of Justice
– Stock Exchanges
– Securities Fraud Plaintiff Attorneys
– Sarbanes-Oxley Act – Sections 302 & 404
– Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
– Industry specific regulations (Privacy, Anti-money laundering, Risk-based capital requirements, etc.)
• Shareholders & Stakeholders
– Outsourcing / Third-party resources
– Credit rating agencies
– Institutional Investors
– Personal liability for Board Members
│19

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
Critical Success Factors1. Organizational Culture
– Governance (Board & Executive Management)
– Roles and Responsibilities
– Incentive Programs
2. Infrastructure
– Simple, consistent and well understood risk framework
– Effective controls at the appropriate stages of the process
3. Integration
– Portfolio view
– Mind the control gaps
– Focused effort with optimal use of resources
4. Continuous Monitoring
– Current risk levels vs. risk appetite
– Effectiveness of control performance
Continuous Monitoring
Integration
Infrastructure
Organizational Culture
│20

www.theiia.org/Training
© Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC © Copyright 2009 - Wheelhouse Advisors LLC
For more information about service offerings, please visit:
www.WheelhouseAdvisors.com
Or email us at:
│21