Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT CKMLEKJT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (Alexandria Division) 2011 FEB 28 P 2= 23 n FftK US D1STRIC1 COURT cSa»a.virgihia Case No. /•/'L *• '-uO LC /rCS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Erik B. Cherdak 149 Thurgood Street Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878 Plaintiff, v. NORDSTROM, INC. 1617 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Defendant. RELATED CASES: l:10-cv-00528-LO-IDD l:10-cv-01029-LO-JFA COMPLAINT Plaintiff Erik B. Cherdak1 (hereinafter "Plaintiff or "Chcrdak"), Pro Se, and in and for his Complaint against NORDSTROM, INC. (hereinafter "NORDSTROM"), and states as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff is an individual who resides in Gaithersburg, Maryland at the address listed in the caption of this Complaint. 2. Defendant NORDSTROM is publicly traded, WASHINGTON, USA corporation having a principal place of business as specified in the caption of this Complaint. 1Although Plaintiff Cherdak is not licensed to practice law in Virginia, he is a registered patent attorney before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 11 FAMEAPPEAL.COM

description

Patent infringement filed by patent lawyer Erik Cherdak vs Nordstrom. see corresponding blog article here http://fameappeal.com/2011/03/nordstrom-caught-shoplifting-a-patent/

Transcript of Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Page 1: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT CKMLEKJT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA(Alexandria Division)

2011 FEB 28 P 2= 23n FftK US D1STRIC1 COURTcSa»a.virgihia

Case No. / • / ' L *• '-uOLC /rCS

COMPLAINT FOR

PATENT INFRINGEMENT

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Erik B. Cherdak

149 Thurgood StreetGaithersburg, Maryland 20878

Plaintiff,

v.

NORDSTROM, INC.1617 Sixth Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98101

Defendant.

RELATED CASES:

l:10-cv-00528-LO-IDD

l:10-cv-01029-LO-JFA

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Erik B. Cherdak1 (hereinafter "Plaintiff or "Chcrdak"), Pro Se, and in

and for his Complaint against NORDSTROM, INC. (hereinafter "NORDSTROM"), and

states as follows:

THE PARTIES

1. Plaintiff is an individual who resides in Gaithersburg, Maryland at the

address listed in the caption of this Complaint.

2. Defendant NORDSTROM is publicly traded, WASHINGTON, USA

corporation having a principal place of business as specified in the caption

ofthis Complaint.

1Although Plaintiff Cherdak is not licensed to practice law in Virginia, he is a registeredpatent attorney before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 2: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 2 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 3: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 3 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 4: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 4 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 5: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 5 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 6: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 6 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 7: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 7 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 8: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 8 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 9: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 9 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 10: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 10 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM

Page 11: Erik Cherdak vs. Nordstrom Patent infringement

Case 1:11-cv-00203-LO -TCB Document 1 Filed 02/28/11 Page 11 of 11

FAMEAPPEAL.COM