ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

30
Thanks

Transcript of ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Page 1: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Thanks

Page 2: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

The effect of time interval between

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticogra

phy and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

BY

Prof/ GOUDA ELABBANSuez canal university

Page 3: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Introduction

Ten to fifteen percent of all patients with gallstones have coexisting common bile duct (CBD) stones in Japan and

Western countries.

Page 4: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Introduction (cont.,)

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) has been widely accepted as the standard procedure for the treatment of (CBD) stones.

Although, surgery after successful ES for CBD stones remains controversial, many authors advocate it because nearly 55% of patients with CBDS have symptoms and half of them have complications.

Page 5: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Introduction (cont.,)

The ideal management of CBD stones is preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), followed by LC with intraoperative cholangiography or intraoperative ERCP to assure the complete clearance of CBD

Page 6: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Introduction (cont.,)

The time interval between ERCP and LC is a matter of debate. Some retrospective and other prospective studies have investigated this issue without sharp clue or definite conclusion. The interval usually varies from days to months.

The influence of timing is thought to be due to possible inflammation during ERCP that caused by bile duct cannulation, contrast agent infusion and sphincterotomy.

Page 7: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

It is suggested that bile is infected

with bacteria after disruption of Oddi’s sphincter by sphincterotomy and stone extraction during ERCP. Also the procedure leads to an inflammation around the gallbladder, including the hepatoduodenal ligament, making cholecystectomy more risky. This inflammatory response reaches its peak 2 to 6 weeks after ERCP .

Accordingly, the risk of aLC in a patient undergoing ERCP is minimized if he was operated as early as possible in the first two weeks

Page 8: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Aim of the work

To evaluate the effect of time interval between LC and ERCP in patients with calcular obstructive

jaundice on conversion rates, postoperative morbidity and

hospital stay.

Page 9: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Methodology

Page 10: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Methodology One hundred and twenty four

patients. The indications for ERCP were; The presence of stones in common bile

duct at ultrasonographic examination. Suspicion of choledocholithiasis based

on the presence of certain predictors (jaundice, dilated CBD, elevated serum bilirubin and elevated alkaline phosphatase).

Patients with evidence of inflammation (cholecystitis, pancreatitis, cholangitis), known allergy to contrast media and possible intra-abdominal adhesions were excluded from the study.

Page 11: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Methodology (cont.,)

ES was performed after the diagnosis of obstructive choledocholithiasis has been established by ERCP.

Then, the patients were randomly classified equally into;

The first group (Early group), LC was performed within 72 hours.

The second group (delayed group), LC was performed after 6 weeks.

Page 12: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results

Page 13: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Age differences between the two groups

40

40.5

41

41.5

42

42.5

43

Average age (years)

Early

Delayed

42.6

40.9

Page 14: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Sex differences between the two groups

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Male Female

Early

Delayed

Page 15: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Lab results in the two groups

0102030405060708090

Elevated Bilirubinlevel

Elevated serumALP level

Elevated serumGGT level

Early

Delayed80.6

%74.2%

83.9%77.4%

38.7%

32.3%

Page 16: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Findings in Ultrasound

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Dilated CBD CBD stone

Early

Delayed

82.3%75.8

%72.6

%67.7%

Page 17: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Conversion rate

conversion rate0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Early

Delayed

Page 18: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Delayed group

Early group

72.216.8 42.3 10.6 Duration of operation (min)*

3.51.2 1.1 1.9 Postoperative hospital stay (days)*

Page 19: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Results (cont.,)

Postoperative complications

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

wound infection fever

Early

Delayed

11.3%

8.1%8.1%

3.2%

Page 20: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy
Page 21: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy
Page 22: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy
Page 23: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Discussion

Page 24: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

During the last three decades, major advances in the management of CBD stones have been

developed .

ERCP is now widespread and some physicians considered it as a routine step to attain ductal clearance before LC.

Few studies have investigated the time

interval between the two procedures and produce conflicting results .

Some studies found that short interval is associated with fewer complications and lower conversion rate

to open cholecystectomy while others found no association .

Page 25: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

In the present study; we evaluated the difference between patients who underwent LC within 72 hours after ERCP and those who underwent LC after 6 weeks of ERCP. The first 72 hours was chosen because the possible inflammatory process produced by ERCP should be at its start without formation of adhesions or development of oedema while after 6 weeks the oedema subsided and adhesions may be improved or completely resolved.

Page 26: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

The present study showed that 22.6% of patients waiting to undergo cholecystectomy after 6 weeks of ERCP had experienced at least one biliary event that require intervention.

Our results show that patients who underwent LC within 72 hours after ERCP have significantly lower conversion rate to open cholecystectomy, shorter hospital stay and shorter operation time when compared to patients who underwent LC

after 6 weeks of ERCP. The main reasons for conversion to laparotomy were extensive inflammatory adhesions and oedema while intraoperative bleeding is a less likely cause

Page 27: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

The operating time was longer in patient underwentdelayed cholecystectomy possibly due to scarring and fibrosis of the biliary tree and Calot's triangle which make the surgeon very cautious during dissection of the junction between cystic duct, common hepatic duct and CBD.

Also patients in this group have significantly longer hospital stay than patients in the early group. This partially due to increased number of patients who underwent open cholecystectomy and the more encountered postoperative complications in the elayedgroup .

Page 28: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

Conclusion

Page 29: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

It is recommended to perform LC as early as

possible within 72 hours after ERCP to decrease the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy thus decreasing the

anticipated postoperative morbidity and prolonged

hospital stay.

Page 30: ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy

THANK YOUProf. Gouda El-Labban