ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy
-
Upload
scu-hospital -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
113 -
download
2
Transcript of ercp and laparoscopic chloycestectomy
Thanks
The effect of time interval between
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticogra
phy and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
BY
Prof/ GOUDA ELABBANSuez canal university
Introduction
Ten to fifteen percent of all patients with gallstones have coexisting common bile duct (CBD) stones in Japan and
Western countries.
Introduction (cont.,)
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) has been widely accepted as the standard procedure for the treatment of (CBD) stones.
Although, surgery after successful ES for CBD stones remains controversial, many authors advocate it because nearly 55% of patients with CBDS have symptoms and half of them have complications.
Introduction (cont.,)
The ideal management of CBD stones is preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), followed by LC with intraoperative cholangiography or intraoperative ERCP to assure the complete clearance of CBD
Introduction (cont.,)
The time interval between ERCP and LC is a matter of debate. Some retrospective and other prospective studies have investigated this issue without sharp clue or definite conclusion. The interval usually varies from days to months.
The influence of timing is thought to be due to possible inflammation during ERCP that caused by bile duct cannulation, contrast agent infusion and sphincterotomy.
It is suggested that bile is infected
with bacteria after disruption of Oddi’s sphincter by sphincterotomy and stone extraction during ERCP. Also the procedure leads to an inflammation around the gallbladder, including the hepatoduodenal ligament, making cholecystectomy more risky. This inflammatory response reaches its peak 2 to 6 weeks after ERCP .
Accordingly, the risk of aLC in a patient undergoing ERCP is minimized if he was operated as early as possible in the first two weeks
Aim of the work
To evaluate the effect of time interval between LC and ERCP in patients with calcular obstructive
jaundice on conversion rates, postoperative morbidity and
hospital stay.
Methodology
Methodology One hundred and twenty four
patients. The indications for ERCP were; The presence of stones in common bile
duct at ultrasonographic examination. Suspicion of choledocholithiasis based
on the presence of certain predictors (jaundice, dilated CBD, elevated serum bilirubin and elevated alkaline phosphatase).
Patients with evidence of inflammation (cholecystitis, pancreatitis, cholangitis), known allergy to contrast media and possible intra-abdominal adhesions were excluded from the study.
Methodology (cont.,)
ES was performed after the diagnosis of obstructive choledocholithiasis has been established by ERCP.
Then, the patients were randomly classified equally into;
The first group (Early group), LC was performed within 72 hours.
The second group (delayed group), LC was performed after 6 weeks.
Results
Results (cont.,)
Age differences between the two groups
40
40.5
41
41.5
42
42.5
43
Average age (years)
Early
Delayed
42.6
40.9
Results (cont.,)
Sex differences between the two groups
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Male Female
Early
Delayed
Results (cont.,)
Lab results in the two groups
0102030405060708090
Elevated Bilirubinlevel
Elevated serumALP level
Elevated serumGGT level
Early
Delayed80.6
%74.2%
83.9%77.4%
38.7%
32.3%
Results (cont.,)
Findings in Ultrasound
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Dilated CBD CBD stone
Early
Delayed
82.3%75.8
%72.6
%67.7%
Results (cont.,)
Conversion rate
conversion rate0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Early
Delayed
Results (cont.,)
Delayed group
Early group
72.216.8 42.3 10.6 Duration of operation (min)*
3.51.2 1.1 1.9 Postoperative hospital stay (days)*
Results (cont.,)
Postoperative complications
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
wound infection fever
Early
Delayed
11.3%
8.1%8.1%
3.2%
Discussion
During the last three decades, major advances in the management of CBD stones have been
developed .
ERCP is now widespread and some physicians considered it as a routine step to attain ductal clearance before LC.
Few studies have investigated the time
interval between the two procedures and produce conflicting results .
Some studies found that short interval is associated with fewer complications and lower conversion rate
to open cholecystectomy while others found no association .
In the present study; we evaluated the difference between patients who underwent LC within 72 hours after ERCP and those who underwent LC after 6 weeks of ERCP. The first 72 hours was chosen because the possible inflammatory process produced by ERCP should be at its start without formation of adhesions or development of oedema while after 6 weeks the oedema subsided and adhesions may be improved or completely resolved.
The present study showed that 22.6% of patients waiting to undergo cholecystectomy after 6 weeks of ERCP had experienced at least one biliary event that require intervention.
Our results show that patients who underwent LC within 72 hours after ERCP have significantly lower conversion rate to open cholecystectomy, shorter hospital stay and shorter operation time when compared to patients who underwent LC
after 6 weeks of ERCP. The main reasons for conversion to laparotomy were extensive inflammatory adhesions and oedema while intraoperative bleeding is a less likely cause
The operating time was longer in patient underwentdelayed cholecystectomy possibly due to scarring and fibrosis of the biliary tree and Calot's triangle which make the surgeon very cautious during dissection of the junction between cystic duct, common hepatic duct and CBD.
Also patients in this group have significantly longer hospital stay than patients in the early group. This partially due to increased number of patients who underwent open cholecystectomy and the more encountered postoperative complications in the elayedgroup .
Conclusion
It is recommended to perform LC as early as
possible within 72 hours after ERCP to decrease the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy thus decreasing the
anticipated postoperative morbidity and prolonged
hospital stay.
THANK YOUProf. Gouda El-Labban