ERASMUS Centralised Actions Overview of Selection Results 2007 Gilles GERVAIS EACEA

ERASMUS Centralised ActionsOverview of Selection Results 2007

Gilles GERVAIS EACEA

Brussels, February 25 and 26, 2008

2

First LLP Call 2007 / Number of Applications by Action

Multilateral Actions

53 (42%) ECD

28 (23%) EVC

23 (19%) EMHE

20 (16%) ECUE

3

*including ineligible applications

First LLP Call 2007 / Number of Applications by Action

4

First LLP Call 2007 – Applications by Coordinating CountryMultilateral Actions

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

N° of Applicant Organisations 8 14 2 1 1 13 3 1 15 11 6 3 4 1 10 1 5 4 4 6 4 4 2 6

AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK

Thematic Networks

0

1

2

3

4

N° applicant organisations 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2


5

First LLP Call 2007 – Applications by Partner Country


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

No Partner Organisations 21 30 19 3 16 56 16 18 46 49 42 22 30 11 2 52 2 18 3 7 5 30 6 29 21 35 14 14 12 12 39


Thematic Networks

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

N° of Partner Organisations 8 25 9 4 14 24 10 9 16 15 16 13 12 12 5 37 1 9 5 11 3 19 7 11 17 9 10 4 11 17 26


6

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

ECD ECUE EMHE EVC EAM ENW

First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Action

7


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

N° of applications received 8 14 2 1 1 13 3 1 15 11 6 3 4 1 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 4 4 6 0 4 4 2 6

N° of applications selected 4 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 3 2 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 2 0 3 1 0 3


First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Country

8

Networks

Applications received: BE, CZ, GR, IT, LT, NL, RO, SE, UK

Networks selected: GR, IT, NL, RO, SE, UK

First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Country

9

Average Size of the Consortium/Network

5,5 7 6,3 7,114,8

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

ECD ECUE EMHE EVC EAM ENW

Average Size of Partnership/Network

10

Well covered - To improve the quality and to increase the volume

of multilateral cooperation between HEI in Europe (62%)

- To support the realisation of a European Higher Education Area (48%)

Less well covered - To reinforce the contribution of HE and advanced

vocational education to the process of innovation (22%) - To increase the degree of transparency and

compatibility between HE and advanced vocational education qualifications gained in Europe (21%)

First LLP Call 2007 – Priority Coverage

11

Curriculum Development

Well covered - Developing or revising integrated

programmes covering a complete cycle of study (55%)

Less well covered - Curricula which actively promote

multilingualism, linguistic diversity, interculturalism in European Society (27%)

12

Cooperation HEIs - Enterprises

Well covered - Developing strategies for cooperation

between higher education and enterprises which has to include a clear concept of guidance and counselling (60%)

Less well covered - Stimulating cooperation between regions

and sectors with little history with cross-border contacts (0%)

13

Modernisation of Higher Education

Well covered - Enhance the quality of the performance,

contribute to the accountability and enhance their

attractiveness (67%)

Less well covered - Develop pro-active funding strategies,

matching the diversity of the institutional profiles with the variety of funding sources (0%)

14

Virtual CampusesWell covered - Providing open educational resources online

ensuring that organisational, technical and quality related issues are addressed in order to share content and make it easily accessible at European level (64%);

- Testing innovative E-learning concepts (64%)

Less well covered - Conducting a systematic critical review of

existing experience or projects on virtual mobility (42%)

15

Networks

Well covered - Define and update generic and subject

specific competences using the same method as the pilot project “Tuning Educational Structure in Europe” (63%)

- Develop standards for quality assurance in their particular field (Bologna Process) (63%)

Less well covered - Address issue relating to governance and

diversification of higher education institutions (13%)

16

Accompanying Measures

Well covered- Communication and valorisation

activities (83%)

Less well covered- Thematic monitoring of projects (33%)

ERASMUS Centralised Actions Overview of Selection Results 2007 Gilles GERVAIS EACEA

Documents

Transcript of ERASMUS Centralised Actions Overview of Selection Results 2007 Gilles GERVAIS EACEA