Shoreline Community College. Guiding Principles Equity Engagement Excellence.
Equity Principles Expository Note
-
Upload
ram-sewak-dubey -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Equity Principles Expository Note
7/31/2019 Equity Principles Expository Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/equity-principles-expository-note 1/4
Diagrammatic Representation of Equity Principles∗
Ram Sewak Dubey†
June 6, 2011
The purpose of this note is to explain the equity notions commonly studied in the social
choice literature through a diagram. Broadly speaking the equity principles are categorized
in two groups, procedural and consequentialist. Suppes-Sen equity which is also known
as Anonymity or (finite) Permutation Invariance is an example of procedural equity. Ham-
mond Equity, Pigou-Dalton Equity, Strong Equity and Hammond Equity for the Future are
examples of the consequentialist equity.
The note is organized as follows. In Section 1, we define the equity principles. In Section
2, we explain these definitions with the help of a diagram.
1 DefinitionsLet R be the set of real numbers and N the set of positive integers. Suppose Y ⊂R is the set
of all possible utilities that any generation can achieve. Then X = Y N is the set of all possible
utility streams. If xn ∈ X , then xn = ( x1, x2, · · · ), where, for all n ∈ N, xn ∈ Y represents
the amount of utility that the generation of period n earns. For all y, z ∈ X , we write y ≥ z if
yn ≥ zn, for all n ∈ N; we write y > z if y ≥ z and y = z; and we write y >> z if yn > zn for
all n ∈ N.
Definition. Hammond Equity (HE): If x, y ∈ X , and there exist i, j ∈N, such that y j > x j >
xi > yi while yk = xk for all k ∈ N\ {i, j}, then x y.
Definition. Strong Equity (SE): If x, y ∈ X , and there exist i, j ∈ N, such that y j > x j >
xi > yi while yk = xk for all k ∈ N\ {i, j}, then x ≻ y.
Definition. Pigou-Dalton Equity (PDE): For all x, y ∈ X , if there exists i, j ∈ N such that
(i) yi < xi x j < y j and xi − yi = y j − x j; and (ii) xk = yk for all k ∈N\ {i, j}, then x ≻ y.
Definition. Suppes Sen Equity or Anonymity Axiom (AN): For all x, y ∈ X , if there exist
i, j ∈ N such that xi = y j and x j = yi, and for every k ∈ N\ {i, j}, xk = yk , then x ∼ y.
∗I thank Tapan Mitra for helpful conversations.†Department of Economics, Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;
Email : [email protected]
1
7/31/2019 Equity Principles Expository Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/equity-principles-expository-note 2/4
Definition. Hammond Equity for the Future (HEF): If x, y ∈ X , are such that x ≡ {a,d ,d , · · · }and y ≡ {b,c,c, · · · } and d < c < b < a, then x ≻ y1.
2 Explanatory Figure
We combine all the equity notions in one diagram. Observe that in the definitions of HE,
SEA, PD and AN, only a pair of elements of sequences x and y are different. Therefore
it is possible to depict the ranking of such sequences by showing the relationship between
the corresponding pair of elements of two sequences. This is useful as we can show the
operation of these equity principles in two dimensional diagram. Also observe that in HEF,
the sequences which are comparable contain only two distinct elements each. Therefore, itis possible to show HEF ranking also in a two dimensional diagram.
2.1 Hammond Equity
Consider allocation A ≡ (a,d ) which is below the 45◦ line. Set of allocations weakly pre-
ferred to A are all the points contained in the interior of the △ ADE . Take any point, say
P ≡ (b,c), in the interior of the △ ADE . Then a > b > c > d implies (b,c) (a,d ).
Set of allocations weakly worse than A are all the points contained in the interior of
the blue rectangle. Take any point, say P ≡ (b,c), in the interior of the rectangle. Then
b > a > d > c implies (b,c) (a,d ).Similarly consider allocation B which is above the 45◦ line. Set of allocations weakly
preferred to B are all the points contained in the interior of the △ BDE . Set of allocations
weakly worse than B are all the points contained in the interior of the red rectangle.
2.2 Strong Equity
Set of allocations strictly preferred to A are all the points contained in the interior of the
△ ADE . Take any point, say P ≡ (b,c), in the interior of the △ ADE . Then a > b > c > d
implies (b,c) ≻ (a,d ). Set of allocations strictly worse than A are all the points contained
in the interior of the blue rectangle. Take any point, sayP
≡ (b,c
), in the interior of therectangle. Then b > a > d > c implies (b,c) ≺ (a,d ).
Set of allocations strictly preferred to B are all the points contained in the interior of the
△ BDE . Set of allocations strictly worse than B are all the points contained in the interior of
the red rectangle.
1This equity notion was introduced in a paper by Asheim and Tungodden (2004).Reference for the other
equity notions are Hammond (1976) (for Hammond Equity), d’Aspremont and Gevers (1977) (for Strong
Equity), Asheim et al. (2007) (we have followed this paper for the definitions in this note).
2
7/31/2019 Equity Principles Expository Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/equity-principles-expository-note 3/4
2.3 Pigou-Dalton EquitySet of allocations strictly preferred to A are all the points on the diagonal AC excluding A
itself. Take any point, say P ≡ (b,c), on the line segment AC . Observe that the sum of the
two coordinates is same on the entire line segment GF ,(since slope of this line is −45◦). So,
b + c = a + d or a − b = c − d . Then a > b > c > d implies (b,c) ≻ (a,d ). Set of allocations
strictly worse than A are all the points on the diagonal AF excluding A itself. Take any point,
say P ≡ (b,c), on the line segment AF . Then b > a > d > c implies (b,c) ≺ (a,d ).
Set of allocations strictly preferred to B are all the points on the diagonal BC which does
not include B itself. Set of allocations strictly worse than B are all the points on the diagonal
BG which does not include B itself.
2.4 Suppes-Sen Equity or Anonymity Axiom
Consider allocation A which is below the 45◦ line. Point B (the mirror image of point A
with respect to the 45◦ line) is the sole point which is comparable to A and both points are
indifferent to each other.
2.5 Hammond Equity for Future
Let s = 1 and t = 2, then the only points which are comparable are those lying below the 45◦
line. Point A refers to an allocation {a,d ,d , · · · }, with xs being consumption in period 1 and xt being the consumption in each of the remaining periods. Consider allocation A which is
below the 45◦ line. Set of allocations strictly preferred to A are all the points contained in
the interior of the triangle ADE . Take any point, say P ≡ (b,c), in the interior of the △ ADE .
Then a > b > c > d implies (b,c) ≻ (a,d ).
Set of allocations strictly worse than A are all the points contained in the interior of
the blue rectangle. Take any point, say P ≡ (b,c), in the interior of the rectangle. Then
b > a > d > c implies (b,c) ≺ (a,d ). Notice the HEF lacks symmetry, in the sense that
points above 45◦ line are not comparable by HEF.
References
G. B. Asheim and B. Tungodden. Resolving distributional conflicts between generations.
Economic Theory, 24(1):221–230, 2004.
G.B. Asheim, T. Mitra, and B. Tungodden. A new equity condition for infinite utility streams
and the possibility of being paretian. In J. Roemer and K. Suzumura, editors, Intergener-
ational Equity and Sustainability, volume 143, pages 55–68. (Palgrave) Macmillan, 2007.
C. d’Aspremont and L. Gevers. Equity and informational basis of collective choice. Review
of Economic Studies, 44(2):199–209, 1977.
P. J. Hammond. Equity, Arrow’s Conditions, and Rawls Difference Principle. Econometrica,
44(4):793–804, 1976.
3
7/31/2019 Equity Principles Expository Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/equity-principles-expository-note 4/4
xt
xsO
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
45◦
45◦
45◦
AN: A ∼ B
SE(HE): A ≺() ∆ ADE; A ≻() Blue Rectangle
SE(HE): B ≺() ∆ BDE; B ≻() Red Rectangle
PDE: A ≺ AC; B ≺ BC; A ≻ AF; B ≻ BG
HEF: A ≺ ∆ ADE
Figure 1 : Commonly used equity notions in Social Choice Literature4